Binance Square
#vitalik

vitalik

1.2M views
1,229 Discussing
PhoenixTraderpro
·
--
⚡ VITALIK DROPS SCI-FI NOVEL SNOWMOON AS $ETH NARRATIVE AND INNOVATION COLLIDE! 💡 Ethereum architect Vitalik Buterin just finished his 32-chapter sci-fi masterpiece, Snowmoon, open-sourcing the entire work under GPL v3. 🔍 Beyond pure fiction, the novel weaves real-world cryptographic primitives like ZK-proofs, privacy tools, and quadratic voting into a blueprint for digital sovereignty. 💡 Markets trade on narrative energy just as much as order flow, and Vitalik embedding mechanism design into pop culture keeps the vision laser-focused. 📊 With derivative works enabled and open pipelines required, this ecosystem movement is already sparking fresh creative momentum across the space. 💬 Does fundamental narrative expansion like this strengthen your long-term spot conviction on $ETH ? 👇 ⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️ 🏷️ #ETH #Ethereum #Vitalik #Crypto ⚡ 💎
⚡ VITALIK DROPS SCI-FI NOVEL SNOWMOON AS $ETH NARRATIVE AND INNOVATION COLLIDE! 💡

Ethereum architect Vitalik Buterin just finished his 32-chapter sci-fi masterpiece, Snowmoon, open-sourcing the entire work under GPL v3. 🔍 Beyond pure fiction, the novel weaves real-world cryptographic primitives like ZK-proofs, privacy tools, and quadratic voting into a blueprint for digital sovereignty.

💡 Markets trade on narrative energy just as much as order flow, and Vitalik embedding mechanism design into pop culture keeps the vision laser-focused. 📊 With derivative works enabled and open pipelines required, this ecosystem movement is already sparking fresh creative momentum across the space. 💬 Does fundamental narrative expansion like this strengthen your long-term spot conviction on $ETH ? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #ETH #Ethereum #Vitalik #Crypto

⚡ 💎
·
--
🚨 VITALIK JUST REVEALED $ETHEREUM’S BIGGER VISION 👀 Ethereum may look VERY different by 2030. Vitalik Buterin outlined a roadmap built around: ⚡ Recursive STARKs 🔐 Stronger cryptographic security 🛡️ Quantum resistance 🚀 More scalability 🔎 Faster verification 🌐 External computing networks The goal? Make Ethereum process far more work without forcing every node to repeat the same calculations. And Hegotá, planned for 2027, could be one of Ethereum’s last “normal” forks before this new architecture takes over. $ETH isn’t just trying to scale. It’s trying to become something much bigger. 👀 #Ethereum #ETH #crypto #Vitalik
🚨 VITALIK JUST REVEALED $ETHEREUM’S BIGGER VISION 👀
Ethereum may look VERY different by 2030.
Vitalik Buterin outlined a roadmap built around:
⚡ Recursive STARKs
🔐 Stronger cryptographic security
🛡️ Quantum resistance
🚀 More scalability
🔎 Faster verification
🌐 External computing networks
The goal?
Make Ethereum process far more work without forcing every node to repeat the same calculations.
And Hegotá, planned for 2027, could be one of Ethereum’s last “normal” forks before this new architecture takes over.
$ETH isn’t just trying to scale.
It’s trying to become something much bigger. 👀
#Ethereum #ETH #crypto #Vitalik
Verified
Vitalik, in his own words: Ethereum must “kill” the blockchain Ethereum has spent a decade proving that blockchains are useful, and now Vitalik says: the next step is to make the very concept of “blockchain” obsolete. On September 27, in a new article titled “The cryptographic world computer,” he dropped a major bombshell: in the future, Ethereum will no longer be a traditional blockchain, but a cryptographic world computer—fundamentally different from today’s Ethereum at the architectural level. 🔧 The puzzle is complete—only the final soldering remains Vitalik’s confidence comes from the fact that Ethereum is actually not just a simple chain anymore: general-purpose computation, PoS, zero-knowledge proofs, L2 scalability—key capabilities are already in place. Next is to truly melt these components into the foundation: a configurable computing architecture, multi-party collaborative block construction, extremely optimized PoS, and zero-knowledge proofs that deeply mature at the base layer. 🎯 What will Ethereum in 2030 look like? ▪️ Verification revolution: say goodbye to the clumsy way of “downloading the entire chain and re-running everything,” with SNARK verification + PeerDAS taking care of it all ▪️ Consensus finality: PoW becomes a thing of the past, and PoS evolves into a highly optimized form ▪️ Power decentralization: blocks are no longer determined by a single entity; multiple parties jointly construct them More importantly, Vitalik pushes the imagination of decentralization to a new height: it’s not only about security and censorship resistance—it can also make the network both fast and efficient through parallel storage, parallel computation, and privacy protection. 🔚 An era-ending period He also planted a deeply suggestive hint: Hegota may be Ethereum’s last “traditional” hard fork. After that, recursive STARKs, automated formal verification, and post-quantum technologies will take over as the main storyline. From ledger to world computer to cryptographic world computer—every time Ethereum turns, it’s redefining itself. This time, Vitalik may be aiming at the endgame of the entire industry. #Vitalik #ETH
Vitalik, in his own words: Ethereum must “kill” the blockchain

Ethereum has spent a decade proving that blockchains are useful, and now Vitalik says: the next step is to make the very concept of “blockchain” obsolete.

On September 27, in a new article titled “The cryptographic world computer,” he dropped a major bombshell: in the future, Ethereum will no longer be a traditional blockchain, but a cryptographic world computer—fundamentally different from today’s Ethereum at the architectural level.

🔧 The puzzle is complete—only the final soldering remains
Vitalik’s confidence comes from the fact that Ethereum is actually not just a simple chain anymore: general-purpose computation, PoS, zero-knowledge proofs, L2 scalability—key capabilities are already in place. Next is to truly melt these components into the foundation: a configurable computing architecture, multi-party collaborative block construction, extremely optimized PoS, and zero-knowledge proofs that deeply mature at the base layer.

🎯 What will Ethereum in 2030 look like?
▪️ Verification revolution: say goodbye to the clumsy way of “downloading the entire chain and re-running everything,” with SNARK verification + PeerDAS taking care of it all
▪️ Consensus finality: PoW becomes a thing of the past, and PoS evolves into a highly optimized form
▪️ Power decentralization: blocks are no longer determined by a single entity; multiple parties jointly construct them

More importantly, Vitalik pushes the imagination of decentralization to a new height: it’s not only about security and censorship resistance—it can also make the network both fast and efficient through parallel storage, parallel computation, and privacy protection.

🔚 An era-ending period
He also planted a deeply suggestive hint: Hegota may be Ethereum’s last “traditional” hard fork. After that, recursive STARKs, automated formal verification, and post-quantum technologies will take over as the main storyline.
From ledger to world computer to cryptographic world computer—every time Ethereum turns, it’s redefining itself. This time, Vitalik may be aiming at the endgame of the entire industry.
#Vitalik #ETH
风中浪客:
Vitalik 又开始给 $ETH 换叙事壳了,链还是那条链,先把 L2 碎片化和 gas 体验整明白再谈“杀死区块链”吧。
·
--
Vitalik: After Hegota, $ETH is more like a “cryptographic world computer”This isn’t another empty roadmap. Vitalik’s 9/27 long post directly renamed it: for post-Lean $ETH, “blockchain” is mostly historical inertia—at its core it’s a hybrid of chain-based consensus and modern cryptography; he calls it a cryptographic world computer. Highlight a few hard points: 1️⃣ Hegota (the one next year) is likely to be the last fork of “something normal people can understand”; after that, the mainline will be recursive STARKs, formal verification, highly optimized consensus, and full quantum security. 2️⃣ Verification will move from “full re-download and re-run” to PeerDAS sampling + SNARK verification; PeerDAS has already been deployed in Fusaka, and it will be extended to complete block contents next.

Vitalik: After Hegota, $ETH is more like a “cryptographic world computer”

This isn’t another empty roadmap. Vitalik’s 9/27 long post directly renamed it: for post-Lean $ETH , “blockchain” is mostly historical inertia—at its core it’s a hybrid of chain-based consensus and modern cryptography; he calls it a cryptographic world computer.
Highlight a few hard points:
1️⃣ Hegota (the one next year) is likely to be the last fork of “something normal people can understand”; after that, the mainline will be recursive STARKs, formal verification, highly optimized consensus, and full quantum security.
2️⃣ Verification will move from “full re-download and re-run” to PeerDAS sampling + SNARK verification; PeerDAS has already been deployed in Fusaka, and it will be extended to complete block contents next.
$ETH $BTC {future}(ETHUSDT) *🇨🇳 Chinese translation:* Ethereum Gas fees briefly surged to 10.5 Gwei According to Etherscan data, Ethereum gas fees briefly rose to 10.5 Gwei. As reported by Odaily, Vitalik said his first original novel, *Snowmoon*, has been completed. Related concept Meme coins appeared on the Ethereum network, causing gas fees to briefly spike. ⚠️ Sorry, the poster generation service is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later; the translation has been completed for you. *Forum post copy:* ⛽ *ETH Gas rockets to 10.5 Gwei! All because of Vitalik’s novel?* V God’s first novel *Snowmoon* is finished; concept Meme coins are instantly pumped, and Gas spikes in the short term! Another V God concept taking off? #ETH #Gas #Vitalik $ETH
$ETH $BTC
*🇨🇳 Chinese translation:*
Ethereum Gas fees briefly surged to 10.5 Gwei

According to Etherscan data, Ethereum gas fees briefly rose to 10.5 Gwei. As reported by Odaily, Vitalik said his first original novel, *Snowmoon*, has been completed. Related concept Meme coins appeared on the Ethereum network, causing gas fees to briefly spike.

⚠️ Sorry, the poster generation service is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later; the translation has been completed for you.

*Forum post copy:*
⛽ *ETH Gas rockets to 10.5 Gwei! All because of Vitalik’s novel?*
V God’s first novel *Snowmoon* is finished; concept Meme coins are instantly pumped, and Gas spikes in the short term!
Another V God concept taking off?
#ETH #Gas #Vitalik $ETH
·
--
Vitalik has just put a name to what becomes $ETH : a “cryptographic world computer,” not just a blockchain. In an essay published today (27/09), he explains that Hegota (fork planned for next year) will probably be the last “normal” upgrade, recognizable to someone from 2015. Then the narrative shifts: recursive STARKs, formal verification, quantum-safe consensus. What changes concretely for the user (according to his text): • verification: download + re-execute → PeerDAS + SNARK • slots cited up to 2030: ~4–8 s, finality ~8–32 s • multi-part block construction, privacy and scale more integrated This is not a code release. It’s a roadmap thesis. Spot Kraken $ETH ~2 693 $, calm tape (F&G 70 Greed). Source: vitalik.eth.limo (27/09/2026). In your opinion, does Hegota really mark the end of the “classic fork” era, or is marketing moving faster than the code? #Ethereum #Vitalik $ETH
Vitalik has just put a name to what becomes $ETH : a “cryptographic world computer,” not just a blockchain.

In an essay published today (27/09), he explains that Hegota (fork planned for next year) will probably be the last “normal” upgrade, recognizable to someone from 2015. Then the narrative shifts: recursive STARKs, formal verification, quantum-safe consensus.

What changes concretely for the user (according to his text):
• verification: download + re-execute → PeerDAS + SNARK
• slots cited up to 2030: ~4–8 s, finality ~8–32 s
• multi-part block construction, privacy and scale more integrated

This is not a code release. It’s a roadmap thesis. Spot Kraken $ETH ~2 693 $, calm tape (F&G 70 Greed).

Source: vitalik.eth.limo (27/09/2026).

In your opinion, does Hegota really mark the end of the “classic fork” era, or is marketing moving faster than the code?

#Ethereum #Vitalik $ETH
📰 What Vitalik talked about in Shanghai is no longer just whether “blockchains can continue to scale.” Instead, over the next 15 years, blockchains may enter a phase of “blockchain + cryptography.” 15 years ago, Bitcoin mainly focused on asset transfer and public verification; later, Ethereum added smart contracts and shifted to proof-of-stake in 2022. Now, the question is starting to move from “who can send what” to “who can see what.” Honestly, this change is more crucial than simply increasing transaction throughput. 🔥 Zero-knowledge proofs are moving from roadmap to real-world applications. SNARKs and STARKs allow one party to complete the computation first, then have others verify the result—without needing to disclose all the computation details. Vitalik mentioned that over the next two years, more plans will likely revolve around STARKs, and AI may also play a role. 💡 Another change is that there are more cryptographic tools available. Fully homomorphic encryption, obfuscation techniques, and IO technologies—what once sounded like distant directions—now have faster, more deployable versions. On-chain, it doesn’t necessarily have to process all data repeatedly; much computation can be done off-chain, and then only the proof is submitted on-chain. 👀 FOCIL is also interesting: in the future, block construction might involve 16 participants working together, and then the final block builder completes the block. The goal is to improve assurances that transactions are included in the next time slot in a timely manner, reducing the room for delays caused by a single participant. In fact, the costs that blockchains have to pay are also quite clear: latency, scalability, and highly general-purpose computing capability. Vitalik believes that over the next 5 years, local user computation, mempools, proof aggregation, and on-chain recording will work together more closely. Do you think this will first change privacy, or first change Ethereum’s performance? #Vitalik #以太坊 #零知识证明 #blockchain technology
📰 What Vitalik talked about in Shanghai is no longer just whether “blockchains can continue to scale.” Instead, over the next 15 years, blockchains may enter a phase of “blockchain + cryptography.”

15 years ago, Bitcoin mainly focused on asset transfer and public verification; later, Ethereum added smart contracts and shifted to proof-of-stake in 2022. Now, the question is starting to move from “who can send what” to “who can see what.” Honestly, this change is more crucial than simply increasing transaction throughput.

🔥 Zero-knowledge proofs are moving from roadmap to real-world applications. SNARKs and STARKs allow one party to complete the computation first, then have others verify the result—without needing to disclose all the computation details. Vitalik mentioned that over the next two years, more plans will likely revolve around STARKs, and AI may also play a role.

💡 Another change is that there are more cryptographic tools available. Fully homomorphic encryption, obfuscation techniques, and IO technologies—what once sounded like distant directions—now have faster, more deployable versions. On-chain, it doesn’t necessarily have to process all data repeatedly; much computation can be done off-chain, and then only the proof is submitted on-chain.

👀 FOCIL is also interesting: in the future, block construction might involve 16 participants working together, and then the final block builder completes the block. The goal is to improve assurances that transactions are included in the next time slot in a timely manner, reducing the room for delays caused by a single participant.

In fact, the costs that blockchains have to pay are also quite clear: latency, scalability, and highly general-purpose computing capability. Vitalik believes that over the next 5 years, local user computation, mempools, proof aggregation, and on-chain recording will work together more closely. Do you think this will first change privacy, or first change Ethereum’s performance?

#Vitalik #以太坊 #零知识证明 #blockchain technology
At ETHShanghai 2026, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin proposed a concept to redesign the mempool using recursive STARKs. The goal is to address post-quantum signatures, privacy protection, and network scalability all at once. The numbers he gave are quite straightforward: verifying post-quantum signatures alone could consume anywhere from 100,000 to 300,000 gas, while privacy-related transactions could reach several hundred thousand gas, even exceeding 1,000,000 gas. The more users there are, the more unsustainable the verification burden becomes. The key to this idea lies in compressing validation work through layers. The value of recursive STARKs is not to make each individual transaction cheaper, but to fold a large number of repetitive proofs into a single smaller proof, so that nodes do not have to bear the full cost for every transaction. In the past, the two directions—post-quantum security and privacy—were often treated as separate issues. But at the gas-cost level, they point to the same contradiction: both security and anonymity come with a price, and block space is limited. Also on-site, Xiao Feng, vice chairman of Yunfeng Holding, said Ethereum does not need a “revival.” He argued that as a market-leading blockchain infrastructure, it still has value and applications, and he stated that the integration of AI and crypto goes far beyond payments. Such remarks are more of an industry perspective and do not indicate that a technical roadmap has already been implemented. Recursive STARKs are still in the proposal stage. What is worth watching is the extent to which the cost trade-offs among post-quantum signatures, private transactions, and scalability will affect Ethereum’s route priorities. Observable variables to look for next include whether the proposal enters formal EIP discussions, and whether client teams provide measured real-world data on the overhead of recursive proofs. #Vitalik #以太坊 #人工智能 $ETH
At ETHShanghai 2026, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin proposed a concept to redesign the mempool using recursive STARKs. The goal is to address post-quantum signatures, privacy protection, and network scalability all at once. The numbers he gave are quite straightforward: verifying post-quantum signatures alone could consume anywhere from 100,000 to 300,000 gas, while privacy-related transactions could reach several hundred thousand gas, even exceeding 1,000,000 gas. The more users there are, the more unsustainable the verification burden becomes.

The key to this idea lies in compressing validation work through layers. The value of recursive STARKs is not to make each individual transaction cheaper, but to fold a large number of repetitive proofs into a single smaller proof, so that nodes do not have to bear the full cost for every transaction. In the past, the two directions—post-quantum security and privacy—were often treated as separate issues. But at the gas-cost level, they point to the same contradiction: both security and anonymity come with a price, and block space is limited.

Also on-site, Xiao Feng, vice chairman of Yunfeng Holding, said Ethereum does not need a “revival.” He argued that as a market-leading blockchain infrastructure, it still has value and applications, and he stated that the integration of AI and crypto goes far beyond payments. Such remarks are more of an industry perspective and do not indicate that a technical roadmap has already been implemented. Recursive STARKs are still in the proposal stage.

What is worth watching is the extent to which the cost trade-offs among post-quantum signatures, private transactions, and scalability will affect Ethereum’s route priorities. Observable variables to look for next include whether the proposal enters formal EIP discussions, and whether client teams provide measured real-world data on the overhead of recursive proofs.

#Vitalik #以太坊 #人工智能 $ETH
📰 ETHShanghai 2026 opens in Shanghai, with the theme “The Renaissance of Ethereum.” This discussion wasn’t just focused on prices—it put privacy, open source, public goods, AI, cryptography, and future networks on the same table. 🔥 EIP-8288 mentioned by Vitalik focuses on exploring a recursive STARK memory pool. With quantum-resistant signature verification potentially costing 100,000 to 300,000 Gas, privacy transactions could even reach tens of thousands to millions of Gas. The proposal aims for memory-pool nodes to first collect, aggregate signatures and proofs, and then hand them to the main chain for verification—reducing the pressure of the main chain having to process each item one by one. 💡 If this direction moves forward, it could help lower verification costs for quantum-resistant transactions, privacy transactions, and Layer2 state proofs. The interval for Layer2 submitting proofs could also be further shortened—from minutes to every minute or even less. However, it’s still in the proposal, simulation, and testing phase, and there’s still a way to go before real deployment. 👀 Xiao Feng’s view is also quite straightforward: Ethereum is more like an application-oriented infrastructure. Once it truly matures, users may not need to feel it so often. The combination of AI and cryptography may instead land in concrete scenarios like stablecoin payments, smart agent transactions, and compute-power price management. Honestly, the industry isn’t at the stage where a small team can quickly iterate and test things within a few months anymore—technical, funding, and regulatory barriers are all getting higher. But the crypto industry still leaves room for open participation. What do you think Ethereum’s next phase should prioritize first: privacy and scalability, or AI application deployment? #ETHShanghai2026 #以太坊 #Vitalik #AI與加密
📰 ETHShanghai 2026 opens in Shanghai, with the theme “The Renaissance of Ethereum.” This discussion wasn’t just focused on prices—it put privacy, open source, public goods, AI, cryptography, and future networks on the same table.

🔥 EIP-8288 mentioned by Vitalik focuses on exploring a recursive STARK memory pool. With quantum-resistant signature verification potentially costing 100,000 to 300,000 Gas, privacy transactions could even reach tens of thousands to millions of Gas. The proposal aims for memory-pool nodes to first collect, aggregate signatures and proofs, and then hand them to the main chain for verification—reducing the pressure of the main chain having to process each item one by one.

💡 If this direction moves forward, it could help lower verification costs for quantum-resistant transactions, privacy transactions, and Layer2 state proofs. The interval for Layer2 submitting proofs could also be further shortened—from minutes to every minute or even less. However, it’s still in the proposal, simulation, and testing phase, and there’s still a way to go before real deployment.

👀 Xiao Feng’s view is also quite straightforward: Ethereum is more like an application-oriented infrastructure. Once it truly matures, users may not need to feel it so often. The combination of AI and cryptography may instead land in concrete scenarios like stablecoin payments, smart agent transactions, and compute-power price management.

Honestly, the industry isn’t at the stage where a small team can quickly iterate and test things within a few months anymore—technical, funding, and regulatory barriers are all getting higher. But the crypto industry still leaves room for open participation. What do you think Ethereum’s next phase should prioritize first: privacy and scalability, or AI application deployment?

#ETHShanghai2026 #以太坊 #Vitalik #AI與加密
📰 At ETHShanghai 2026, Vitalik detailed EIP-8288. The core idea isn’t to build yet another more complex on-chain verification system, but to keep a large number of signatures and proofs in the mempool for aggregation first—then write only a single aggregated proof into the block. 🔥 Now, a typical Ethereum transaction consumes about 21,000 gas, while verifying a single ECDSA signature alone requires around 4,000 gas. With quantum-safe signatures, costs could rise to 100,000–300,000 gas. For privacy protocols, ZK operations usually cost at least 350,000 gas, and in complex cases even up to 1,000,000 gas. Even more extreme: if you pursue both quantum safety and privacy at the same time, STARK proofs can consume roughly 8 million gas. Based on the estimates in the talk, Ethereum’s throughput could drop from about 25 TPS to around 0.25 TPS—the stronger the security and privacy, the harder transactions become to run. 💡 EIP-8288’s approach is to have mempool nodes collect transactions along with their signatures and proofs, perform aggregation before the transactions enter the block. The chain no longer stores these huge original objects; in the end, it only verifies one STARK proof that covers the entire batch of transactions. Each dependency’s data takes up about 96 bytes, and some are even as small as 65 bytes. This design builds on EIP-8141 native account abstraction. Transactions can clearly declare their signature schemes and verification algorithms. Vitalik likened it to a kind of “specialized sharding”: split out the heaviest verification work, handle it in parallel off-chain by nodes, while the consensus layer only needs to manage the data volume—kept to roughly 100–300 KB per block. 🤔 Of course, having a clear technical path doesn’t mean all problems will automatically disappear after deployment. The real key is whether the aggregation process can run reliably, and whether nodes are willing to take on this off-chain computation. Do you think EIP-8288 will first drive privacy applications, or quantum-safe wallets? #以太坊 #EIP8288 #Vitalik #区块链技术
📰 At ETHShanghai 2026, Vitalik detailed EIP-8288. The core idea isn’t to build yet another more complex on-chain verification system, but to keep a large number of signatures and proofs in the mempool for aggregation first—then write only a single aggregated proof into the block.
🔥 Now, a typical Ethereum transaction consumes about 21,000 gas, while verifying a single ECDSA signature alone requires around 4,000 gas. With quantum-safe signatures, costs could rise to 100,000–300,000 gas. For privacy protocols, ZK operations usually cost at least 350,000 gas, and in complex cases even up to 1,000,000 gas.
Even more extreme: if you pursue both quantum safety and privacy at the same time, STARK proofs can consume roughly 8 million gas. Based on the estimates in the talk, Ethereum’s throughput could drop from about 25 TPS to around 0.25 TPS—the stronger the security and privacy, the harder transactions become to run.
💡 EIP-8288’s approach is to have mempool nodes collect transactions along with their signatures and proofs, perform aggregation before the transactions enter the block. The chain no longer stores these huge original objects; in the end, it only verifies one STARK proof that covers the entire batch of transactions. Each dependency’s data takes up about 96 bytes, and some are even as small as 65 bytes.

This design builds on EIP-8141 native account abstraction. Transactions can clearly declare their signature schemes and verification algorithms. Vitalik likened it to a kind of “specialized sharding”: split out the heaviest verification work, handle it in parallel off-chain by nodes, while the consensus layer only needs to manage the data volume—kept to roughly 100–300 KB per block.
🤔 Of course, having a clear technical path doesn’t mean all problems will automatically disappear after deployment. The real key is whether the aggregation process can run reliably, and whether nodes are willing to take on this off-chain computation. Do you think EIP-8288 will first drive privacy applications, or quantum-safe wallets?
#以太坊 #EIP8288 #Vitalik #区块链技术
A single tweet pulled two cents’ worth of TRUE up to nearly 15 cents within an hour, with a peak rise of more than 7x. But on the product side, the migration still hasn’t even landed—its liquidity pool is so thin that you can poke a hole in it. The tweet from Vitalik wasn’t saying “yet another project is on fire.” He was saying, “who should actually arbitrate wins and losses in prediction markets?” The fact that Trueo moved from Base to Ethereum—one ordinary migration announcement—got elevated into a route-and-philosophy battle between decentralized arbitration and centralized arbitration. Fifteen five-star-grade big-name V accounts jumped on to hype it up, making the topic blow up even more. Data is the truth timeline: at 21:00 on September 21 (UTC), TRUE surged from $0.0207 to $0.0904, topping out intraday at $0.1487. The 24-hour trading volume was about $4.0 million, while liquidity in the pool was only $540k—volume was more than 7x the pool’s liquidity. With a setup like this, even a little money moving in and out makes the price ride a roller coaster. Total token supply is 100 million. Team advisors, prediction-market incentives, and liquidity incentives all take up a significant share. Next, both unlock schedules and sell pressure are still up in the air—this isn’t me speculating; it’s clearly spelled out in the official documentation. For this round, I’m not going long. One tweet can ignite emotions, but it doesn’t create real user retention and trading depth. If you really want me to change my mind, there’s only one scenario: the migration truly goes live, the arbitration for the disputed market becomes open, transparent, and able to withstand scrutiny, and liquidity can still hold up without shrinking. Only then does the story of “decentralized arbitration” actually stand. Right now, this is textbook attention arbitrage. $TRUE #Ethereum #Vitalik
A single tweet pulled two cents’ worth of TRUE up to nearly 15 cents within an hour, with a peak rise of more than 7x. But on the product side, the migration still hasn’t even landed—its liquidity pool is so thin that you can poke a hole in it.

The tweet from Vitalik wasn’t saying “yet another project is on fire.” He was saying, “who should actually arbitrate wins and losses in prediction markets?” The fact that Trueo moved from Base to Ethereum—one ordinary migration announcement—got elevated into a route-and-philosophy battle between decentralized arbitration and centralized arbitration. Fifteen five-star-grade big-name V accounts jumped on to hype it up, making the topic blow up even more.

Data is the truth timeline: at 21:00 on September 21 (UTC), TRUE surged from $0.0207 to $0.0904, topping out intraday at $0.1487. The 24-hour trading volume was about $4.0 million, while liquidity in the pool was only $540k—volume was more than 7x the pool’s liquidity. With a setup like this, even a little money moving in and out makes the price ride a roller coaster.

Total token supply is 100 million. Team advisors, prediction-market incentives, and liquidity incentives all take up a significant share. Next, both unlock schedules and sell pressure are still up in the air—this isn’t me speculating; it’s clearly spelled out in the official documentation.

For this round, I’m not going long. One tweet can ignite emotions, but it doesn’t create real user retention and trading depth. If you really want me to change my mind, there’s only one scenario: the migration truly goes live, the arbitration for the disputed market becomes open, transparent, and able to withstand scrutiny, and liquidity can still hold up without shrinking. Only then does the story of “decentralized arbitration” actually stand. Right now, this is textbook attention arbitrage.

$TRUE #Ethereum #Vitalik
🚨 Ethereum could be entering a new phase of transaction design with EIP-8141. Vitalik Buterin and Ethereum developers are pushing a new “Frame Transaction” model aimed at making transactions more flexible, efficient, and scalable. The proposal separates transaction validation, gas payment, and execution into programmable frames, opening the door to features like account abstraction, gas sponsorship, key rotation, batching, and even stronger post-quantum security. The bigger idea is to make Ethereum process transaction dependencies more efficiently, potentially allowing more verification work to happen in parallel. If successfully implemented, EIP-8141 could become an important building block for Ethereum’s long-term scaling roadmap. $ETH {spot}(ETHUSDT) isn’t just evolving at the asset level — its underlying transaction architecture is evolving too. 🔥 #Ethereum #ETH #EIP8141 #Crypto #Vitalik
🚨 Ethereum could be entering a new phase of transaction design with EIP-8141.

Vitalik Buterin and Ethereum developers are pushing a new “Frame Transaction” model aimed at making transactions more flexible, efficient, and scalable.

The proposal separates transaction validation, gas payment, and execution into programmable frames, opening the door to features like account abstraction, gas sponsorship, key rotation, batching, and even stronger post-quantum security.

The bigger idea is to make Ethereum process transaction dependencies more efficiently, potentially allowing more verification work to happen in parallel.

If successfully implemented, EIP-8141 could become an important building block for Ethereum’s long-term scaling roadmap.

$ETH
isn’t just evolving at the asset level — its underlying transaction architecture is evolving too. 🔥

#Ethereum #ETH #EIP8141 #Crypto #Vitalik
📰 A debate about whether “AI will cause Bitcoin to be cut in half within the next two years” was directly taken up by Vitalik Buterin. Silicon Valley investor and podcast host of Doom Debates, Liron Shapira, said he has a 50% chance of believing that Bitcoin could fall by more than 50% over the next two years, because AI may weaken investors’ expectations of network security. 🔥 Vitalik’s view is completely the opposite. He believes AI won’t truly threaten Bitcoin’s security—and he added that he has about 90% of his net worth in crypto assets, basically betting real money in the opposite direction. 💡 He breaks the risks into two types: one is network-layer attacks that AI might enable—problems like this can be addressed by upgrading client software and infrastructure; the other is the complete compromise of Bitcoin’s hash algorithm or proof-of-work, which he believes is extremely unlikely. Honestly, the crux of the debate isn’t just whether “AI will be powerful,” but whether it can directly undermine Bitcoin’s security mechanisms. The former is more like the system needing ongoing patching; only the latter would truly change the rules of the game. 🤔 Do you think AI is more likely to create pressure from network attacks first, or that it will ultimately be difficult to reach Bitcoin’s core security mechanisms? #BTC #比特币 #AI #Vitalik
📰 A debate about whether “AI will cause Bitcoin to be cut in half within the next two years” was directly taken up by Vitalik Buterin.

Silicon Valley investor and podcast host of Doom Debates, Liron Shapira, said he has a 50% chance of believing that Bitcoin could fall by more than 50% over the next two years, because AI may weaken investors’ expectations of network security.

🔥 Vitalik’s view is completely the opposite. He believes AI won’t truly threaten Bitcoin’s security—and he added that he has about 90% of his net worth in crypto assets, basically betting real money in the opposite direction.

💡 He breaks the risks into two types: one is network-layer attacks that AI might enable—problems like this can be addressed by upgrading client software and infrastructure; the other is the complete compromise of Bitcoin’s hash algorithm or proof-of-work, which he believes is extremely unlikely.

Honestly, the crux of the debate isn’t just whether “AI will be powerful,” but whether it can directly undermine Bitcoin’s security mechanisms. The former is more like the system needing ongoing patching; only the latter would truly change the rules of the game.

🤔 Do you think AI is more likely to create pressure from network attacks first, or that it will ultimately be difficult to reach Bitcoin’s core security mechanisms?

#BTC #比特币 #AI #Vitalik
·
--
Vitalik pushes back: doesn’t believe AI will cut $BTC in halfLet’s get straight to the sharp point: this is not a price prediction post, but a public wager on “security narrative vs. transition-period reality.” Silicon Valley investor Liron Shapira (@liron) said on September 6: he is 50% confident that within two years $BTC will be shaken by AI, undermining the supposedly solid security/robustness narrative, and will drop by more than 50%. Vitalik (@VitalikButerin) is standing directly on the opposite side. His point, in essence, is: long term, he is relatively optimistic about network security; the real challenge is the transition period. $BTC At the very least, it can handle problems that do not require social consensus—things like client and mining pool upgrades—without turning them into full-network political battles.

Vitalik pushes back: doesn’t believe AI will cut $BTC in half

Let’s get straight to the sharp point: this is not a price prediction post, but a public wager on “security narrative vs. transition-period reality.”
Silicon Valley investor Liron Shapira (@liron) said on September 6: he is 50% confident that within two years $BTC will be shaken by AI, undermining the supposedly solid security/robustness narrative, and will drop by more than 50%.
Vitalik (@VitalikButerin) is standing directly on the opposite side. His point, in essence, is: long term, he is relatively optimistic about network security; the real challenge is the transition period. $BTC At the very least, it can handle problems that do not require social consensus—things like client and mining pool upgrades—without turning them into full-network political battles.
🚨🚨VITALIK STILL FULLY BACKING ETHEREUM 🚨🚨 Crypto discussions exploded after reports claimed that Vitalik Buterin holds around 90% of his wealth in $ETH 👀🔥 For many Ethereum supporters, this is being seen as a massive confidence signal for the future of Ethereum. Traders believe it shows strong long-term belief in the ecosystem despite market volatility. At the same time, critics argue that crypto markets remain risky and unpredictable even for top projects. Still, Ethereum continues leading conversations across the industry as adoption keeps growing globally. 📈 👉 Big Question: Will Ethereum lead the next major crypto bull run again? 🚀 #ETH #Ethereum #Vitalik #VitalikReveals90PercentWorthInETH
🚨🚨VITALIK STILL FULLY BACKING ETHEREUM 🚨🚨
Crypto discussions exploded after reports claimed that Vitalik Buterin holds around 90% of his wealth in $ETH 👀🔥
For many Ethereum supporters, this is being seen as a massive confidence signal for the future of Ethereum. Traders believe it shows strong long-term belief in the ecosystem despite market volatility.
At the same time, critics argue that crypto markets remain risky and unpredictable even for top projects.
Still, Ethereum continues leading conversations across the industry as adoption keeps growing globally. 📈
👉 Big Question: Will Ethereum lead the next major crypto bull run again? 🚀
#ETH #Ethereum #Vitalik #VitalikReveals90PercentWorthInETH
💡 Vitalik just stepped up to defend Ethereum... 8 Ethereum Foundation leaders just left 😱 But Vitalik responded: "ETH's fundamentals are stronger than ever" 💪 And the data agrees: 📊 ETH chart bounced from $2,052 📊 Community: 81% still bullish 📊 ETH staked supply: 39M record 📊 AI tokens rallying on ETH network When a founder defends his project this publicly — it means: They are NOT giving up. They are DOUBLING DOWN. 🔥 $2,000 ETH support = The floor that must hold 💎 Watching this closely 👀 — The Crypto Scout 🎯 #Ethereum #ETH #Vitalik #crypto
💡 Vitalik just stepped up
to defend Ethereum...
8 Ethereum Foundation leaders
just left 😱
But Vitalik responded:
"ETH's fundamentals are stronger
than ever" 💪
And the data agrees:
📊 ETH chart bounced from $2,052
📊 Community: 81% still bullish
📊 ETH staked supply: 39M record
📊 AI tokens rallying on ETH network
When a founder defends his project
this publicly — it means:
They are NOT giving up.
They are DOUBLING DOWN. 🔥
$2,000 ETH support =
The floor that must hold 💎
Watching this closely 👀
— The Crypto Scout 🎯
#Ethereum #ETH #Vitalik #crypto
🚀 Vitalik speaks up! Vitalik promises to streamline the EF organization and reduce ETH sell-offs, is the community stable now? For a long time, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) has been regularly dumping ETH to raise operational funds, which always makes the community shout "market crash". But this time, Vitalik Buterin stepped in to give everyone a sense of security! Vitalik clearly committed to fully streamline the Ethereum Foundation (EF) organization to improve the efficiency of fund usage. More importantly, he stated that the frequency and scale of EF's ETH sell-offs will be significantly reduced, shifting towards more diverse and sustainable ecological funding models. Key point: EF's role is as an ecological "igniter", not a "long-term cash cow". This statement undoubtedly boosted market confidence. Streamlining the organization means Ethereum is moving towards a more decentralized and efficient direction; reducing sell-offs directly alleviates the selling pressure in the secondary market. #以太坊 #ETH #Vitalik #vitalik承诺精简ef减售eth
🚀 Vitalik speaks up! Vitalik promises to streamline the EF organization and reduce ETH sell-offs, is the community stable now?
For a long time, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) has been regularly dumping ETH to raise operational funds, which always makes the community shout "market crash". But this time, Vitalik Buterin stepped in to give everyone a sense of security!
Vitalik clearly committed to fully streamline the Ethereum Foundation (EF) organization to improve the efficiency of fund usage. More importantly, he stated that the frequency and scale of EF's ETH sell-offs will be significantly reduced, shifting towards more diverse and sustainable ecological funding models.
Key point: EF's role is as an ecological "igniter", not a "long-term cash cow".
This statement undoubtedly boosted market confidence. Streamlining the organization means Ethereum is moving towards a more decentralized and efficient direction; reducing sell-offs directly alleviates the selling pressure in the secondary market.

#以太坊 #ETH #Vitalik
#vitalik承诺精简ef减售eth
Vitalik's latest post mentions: the Ethereum Foundation is cutting its budget by 40% this year. This isn't just a temporary contraction; it's a direction that was planned in last year's financial management policy. The core change is that the EF is shifting from a "high expenditure support ecosystem" model to one that resembles a long-term investment-style donation fund: spending is expected to be around 15% of remaining funds per year before 2026, with a target to drop to about 5% per year after 2030. This means the foundation is placing more emphasis on long-term sustainability, which may also pressure the Ethereum ecosystem to reduce its reliance on direct funding from the EF. For $ETH , the short term isn't a price signal, but the long term is more worth paying attention to regarding changes in governance, ecosystem self-sustainability, and funding efficiency. #以太坊 #Vitalik #CryptoMarket
Vitalik's latest post mentions: the Ethereum Foundation is cutting its budget by 40% this year. This isn't just a temporary contraction; it's a direction that was planned in last year's financial management policy.

The core change is that the EF is shifting from a "high expenditure support ecosystem" model to one that resembles a long-term investment-style donation fund: spending is expected to be around 15% of remaining funds per year before 2026, with a target to drop to about 5% per year after 2030.

This means the foundation is placing more emphasis on long-term sustainability, which may also pressure the Ethereum ecosystem to reduce its reliance on direct funding from the EF. For $ETH , the short term isn't a price signal, but the long term is more worth paying attention to regarding changes in governance, ecosystem self-sustainability, and funding efficiency.

#以太坊 #Vitalik #CryptoMarket
·
--
Bullish
In 2013, a 19-year-old programmer looked at Bitcoin and thought: "What if blockchain could do more than just send money?" Most people ignored him. He wasn't a billionaire. He wasn't famous. He didn't have a giant company behind him. Just an idea. That teenager was Vitalik Buterin. One year later, he introduced Ethereum. People laughed. Many said nobody would need smart contracts. Others believed Bitcoin was enough. Fast forward to today. Thousands of applications. Billions locked in DeFi. Entire industries built on top of Ethereum. The craziest part? The future of crypto was changed by a teenager most people underestimated. A reminder that sometimes the world's biggest revolutions don't start in boardrooms. They start with one person asking a different question. #Vitalik #ETH
In 2013, a 19-year-old programmer looked at Bitcoin and thought:

"What if blockchain could do more than just send money?"

Most people ignored him.

He wasn't a billionaire.
He wasn't famous.
He didn't have a giant company behind him.

Just an idea.

That teenager was Vitalik Buterin.

One year later, he introduced Ethereum.

People laughed.
Many said nobody would need smart contracts.
Others believed Bitcoin was enough.

Fast forward to today.

Thousands of applications.
Billions locked in DeFi.
Entire industries built on top of Ethereum.

The craziest part?

The future of crypto was changed by a teenager most people underestimated.

A reminder that sometimes the world's biggest revolutions don't start in boardrooms.

They start with one person asking a different question.

#Vitalik #ETH
At 3 a.m., I’m still scrolling Twitter Vitalik posted a long article—I read it three times Ethereum is about to change. Not small tweaks and patches, but a full-scale overhaul on the level of the “Merge” He said that after the Berlin conference, they set a “Lean Ethereum” roadmap. Over the next three to four years, it will be rolled out step by step. Four tracks are being pushed together: First, recursive STARKs replacing today’s re-execution verification. What does that mean? Previously, every transaction required the whole network to rerun everything to confirm it. In the future, STARKs will verify it all at once. This is a rewrite of the underlying architecture Second, quantum safety is promoted to a protocol priority. Right now, the signature algorithms used by Bitcoin and Ethereum are basically paper in front of quantum computers. Vitalik wants to replace every fragile component before this becomes a real problem Third, one to two rounds of finality confirmation. Decouple the availability layer and consensus, and say goodbye to the anxiety of waiting for confirmation from 12 blocks Fourth, Gas down by 10x. With changes to UTXO storage, ring buffers, and state migration—after ERC-20 and NFT are migrated to new state types, fees could drop by an order of magnitude And on top of that, Saylor said over the weekend that BTC runs on capital flows rather than halving, while the IMF warned that tokenization makes smart contracts “too big to fail” Three storylines resonate on the same day This industry is shifting from trading coins to building infrastructure. Before, everyone cared about whether “it’ll go up or down tomorrow.” Now the smartest people are discussing recursive proofs and state tree architecture Personally, I think this is ETH’s most promising direction. If Gas really drops 10x, DeFi and NFT gameplay will be completely different But a roadmap is a roadmap—the rollout will still take three or four years Before that, can ETH hold above 1800? $ETH #Vitalik #LeanEthereum #narrative
At 3 a.m., I’m still scrolling Twitter

Vitalik posted a long article—I read it three times

Ethereum is about to change. Not small tweaks and patches, but a full-scale overhaul on the level of the “Merge”

He said that after the Berlin conference, they set a “Lean Ethereum” roadmap. Over the next three to four years, it will be rolled out step by step. Four tracks are being pushed together:

First, recursive STARKs replacing today’s re-execution verification. What does that mean? Previously, every transaction required the whole network to rerun everything to confirm it. In the future, STARKs will verify it all at once. This is a rewrite of the underlying architecture

Second, quantum safety is promoted to a protocol priority. Right now, the signature algorithms used by Bitcoin and Ethereum are basically paper in front of quantum computers. Vitalik wants to replace every fragile component before this becomes a real problem

Third, one to two rounds of finality confirmation. Decouple the availability layer and consensus, and say goodbye to the anxiety of waiting for confirmation from 12 blocks

Fourth, Gas down by 10x. With changes to UTXO storage, ring buffers, and state migration—after ERC-20 and NFT are migrated to new state types, fees could drop by an order of magnitude

And on top of that, Saylor said over the weekend that BTC runs on capital flows rather than halving, while the IMF warned that tokenization makes smart contracts “too big to fail”

Three storylines resonate on the same day

This industry is shifting from trading coins to building infrastructure. Before, everyone cared about whether “it’ll go up or down tomorrow.” Now the smartest people are discussing recursive proofs and state tree architecture

Personally, I think this is ETH’s most promising direction. If Gas really drops 10x, DeFi and NFT gameplay will be completely different

But a roadmap is a roadmap—the rollout will still take three or four years

Before that, can ETH hold above 1800?

$ETH #Vitalik #LeanEthereum #narrative
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number