60

A 60% surge, but the most noteworthy detail is this—

Today EDGE jumped from 0.38 all the way to 0.61, with volume surging to 96.50 million USDT. The key point is that the hourly chart has printed three consecutive bullish candles. Every pullback has buyers stepping in, which suggests this isn’t just a simple wick.

The funding rate of 0.0237% is still fairly mild. The long-to-short ratio is 57% vs 43%—longs are slightly ahead, but not crowded. The biggest fear with this kind of move is everyone charging in at once; the good news is there’s still room.

I just checked the recent posts—this coin hasn’t really been discussed yet. After breaking the 0.55 resistance, the next thing to watch is whether it can hold above the 0.60 psychological, round-number level.

$EDGE #强势突破 #60%涨幅
Click the small card below to quickly view the chart👇

🏆 CRYPTO vs THE WORLD

$BTC #12 of all assets · needs +$15.40B to flip Broadcom
ETH #60 of all assets · needs +$265.9M to flip UnitedHealth

🍳 Crypto vs stocks, gold, everything. Not financial advice.

#CookingBNB #Crypto

The narrative of L2 is rotating. When capital starts digging through forgotten undervalued assets one by one, $ARB is precisely at this re-pricing point. Before early September, it moved sideways in the 0.08–0.09 range for nearly two weeks, with trading volume only around 30–80 million. After that, volume immediately expanded to 400–700 million, and the price pushed above 0.24. Such a scale of change suggests the capital isn’t just here to pick up bargains—it looks more like it has chosen a sector direction.

In terms of price structure, from September 6th to 7th it first surged to 0.19, then pulled back and tested down at 0.133, before rallying again to 0.24. There was a confirmation via a lower-volume pullback before making new highs—steadier than simply climbing higher in one go. What’s even more worth considering is where $ARB sits now: it still has nearly 90% room to reach its ATH, and it ranks #60 by market cap. This doesn’t feel like an asset surrounded by market enthusiasm—instead, it looks like a “missing” catch-up option that capital pulled out from an old L2 narrative.

What gives me reservations is the nature of the capital. If this is only existing capital cycling among different sectors, and if you treat $ARB as a rotation target, the support above $0.20 could break at any time. Whether this rally can evolve from a move into a trend depends on whether new liquidity is coming in and taking $ARB as part of an L2 allocation—not just firing one shot and then moving elsewhere.

What clues do you see on the order book: are there incremental inflows, or is the same capital just switching between high and low points?

$ETC just posted a 6.29% weekly gain to $7.38, and the only headline actually about the coin is that its community runs the twitter account by committee.

that's literally how it works. tweets get proposed in github, reviewed for quality and relevance, then posted from a shared account. community call #59 already happened, #60 is booked for friday, same crowd showing up week after week to talk core-geth updates and a rebrand.

most coins this size don't have anyone left in the room. ETC still does, and that's the actual reason i'd bet on this dip getting bought before i'd bet on any headline moving it. no catalyst here, just people who never left.

right now $ETC trades at $7.39, off the 24h high of $7.43 and well above the 24h low of $7.09. if it holds $7.09, i think it grinds back toward that $7.43 high by the weekend. if it loses $7.09, i'm wrong on this and anyone who bought the bounce is holding a loss into a coin with no news catalyst to bail them out.

holding $7.09 or losing it?

follow me for more calls like this.

$ALGO This move is quite crisp on the 15m—volume directly spiked to 3.49x, the buy/sell ratio is 2.72, and the active buy side accounts for 46.2%. The closing price even broke above the upper edge of the last ~20 5m candles.

But interestingly, OI didn’t rise—instead it fell: 15m -0.17%, 1h -0.16%. The notional change is only at the level of ~70K / 105K USDT. Price is up while positions are down—this is a typical short-covering move, not something driven by fresh long entries.

The OI abnormal percentile is 91.1%, ranked #8 in the whole pool, while the notional change is only #60. That suggests the abnormality is in the structure, not in the size of the capital. The 24h trading value is 13.52M; depth isn’t very thick. At this scale, the durability of this upswing is questionable.

The price is pushed up by short covering—after the covering is done, you’ll need to see whether real money steps in to take over. Keep an eye on it for now; don’t rush to chase.

$ARB is down 23.61% on the week and 8.9% just today, sitting at $0.1533 while arbitrum spends that same stretch posting about tokenized UK government bonds.

here's what the team is claiming about itself: a "programmable economy" for businesses, with a compliance engine, configurable confidentiality, priority gas auctions, and faster settlement. that's arbitrum's own pitch, not a customer saying it works yet.

the concrete piece is xLiquida. their co-founder showed up at arbitrum's Open House in London working on tokenized UK Treasury bonds, and the team is also pointing at USDai and a programmable compute market it says is growing fast. this is founder-house early, but it's a real direction, not vaporware.

my read: the roadmap is aimed at institutions, but the discount is aimed at you. the token trades like those businesses never show up, and i don't buy that a chain doing this much groundwork sits at #60 forever.

follow me for more calls like this.

33% gain, but the funding rate is only 0.0223%—what does that mean?

XAN traded $56M in volume today, with price moving from 0.0159 to 0.0219.
It was broadly stronger over the past 8 hours, but the long/short ratio of 60/40 is not extremely crowded.

The key is the last candlestick: after spiking to 0.02198, it pulled back,
while volume kept increasing but price started to move sideways—classic profit-taking digestion.

If it can hold above 0.0207 in the next 1-2 hours,
bulls may still get one more attempt at the previous high; if it breaks below,
short-term price may need to retest the 0.0195-0.0200 range for support.

$XAN #资金费率偏低 #60% bulls
Click the card below to quickly check the market👇

Behind the 60% surge, there’s an unusual signal: the funding rate is actually negative.

RAYSOL hit 1.38 today, with trading volume reaching $340 million, but a rate of -0.003% means shorts are still paying longs. Usually, such a sharp rally is driven by leveraged longs piling in, which would make the funding rate insanely positive—but this time is different.

The hourly chart has closed green candles in a row, and the buying pressure is coming from real spot capital, not pure leveraged speculation. The long/short ratio is 49/51, almost perfectly balanced, showing that no one is blindly chasing the top; if anything, that’s a healthy sign.

This kind of divergence often means the trend is more stable—the price is rising hard, but leverage isn’t overheated, so the room for a pullback is relatively limited.

$RAYSOL #资金费率背离 #60%
Tap the small card below to quickly check the market👇

32% gains, but 60% of positions are still short — this is a classic short squeeze setup.

BULLA has posted three consecutive hourly green candles, rallying from 0.058 to 0.078, with trading volume of 456 million U.
The funding rate of 0.04% is not extreme, which means leverage hasn’t gone wild yet.
The key is the long/short ratio: 40% long vs 60% short. As the price moves up, the shorts still haven’t closed.

If it keeps breaking above 0.08, these shorts will be forced to stop out, accelerating the rally.
But if it falls back below 0.07, long-side profit taking could come quickly as well.

$BULLA #轧空预警 #60% short
Click the card below to quickly check the market👇

60% increase, but the funding rate is negative—what does that mean?

RAYSOL went from 0.83 to 1.39 today, with a trading volume of 180 million USDT.
Looks strong, right? But take a closer look: funding rate -0.00247%, long/short ratio 50/50.

Big players are using the rebound to distribute, while retail traders are chasing.
The overall trend strengthened within 8 hours, but the last candlestick started to see declining volume.

I’ve seen this kind of divergence too many times—
there may still be some short-term momentum, but don’t chase it; wait for a pullback.

$RAYSOL #资金费率背离 #60%
Click the small card below to quickly view the market👇

Behind the 60% rise, buying momentum is starting to run out of breath.

$4 climbed to 2.87 cents today before pulling back, and is now sitting at 2.52 cents. Trading volume piled up to $208 million, but over the past 8 hours the price has been weakening the whole way — a classic sign of a rally losing steam.

The funding rate is 0.066%, so longs are still paying shorts, but the long/short ratio of 54/46 is not extremely crowded. In times like this, chasing the move higher carries notable risk; waiting for it to stabilize is the safer play.

$4 #Meme异动 #60% gain
Click the small card below to quickly check the market👇

60% of people are still shorting, yet the coin price has risen 59%.

MARSCOIN reached 0.18455 today, with trading volume surging to $780 million. The funding rate of 0.05278% is not too extreme, but the long/short ratio shows that 60% of positions are short — which means a large number of bears are now caught off guard.

The latest candlestick showed a clear spike in volume, and price has been fluctuating in the 0.17-0.19 range. If it keeps moving higher, forced short covering could accelerate the rally; if it turns downward, those short positions may instead become support.

I'm watching the 0.194 level closely. If it breaks through, there may be another short-term leg up.

$MARSCOIN #逼空行情 #60% short positions
Click the card below to quickly check the market👇

Behind the 43% surge, the bears actually had the upper hand.

MARSCOIN surged to around $0.18 today, with trading volume hitting 774 million U, but position data shows that 60% are short positions. What does this mean? Many people are shorting into the rally, thinking this move won’t go far.

The 8-hour chart does show some gradual weakening, with a pullback from the high. The bulls pushed hard for a while, and now they seem a bit out of breath. If the price keeps moving sideways, those short positions could get squeezed; but if it keeps pulling back, the bears will have called it right.

In situations like this, I usually wait until the direction is clearer before making a move.

$MARSCOIN #多空分歧 #60% short positions
Tap the card below to quickly check the market👇

A 68% gain, but 60% of positions are still short?

MARSCOIN rose to 0.193 today, with trading volume surging to $830 million. More interestingly, although the price has closed higher for three straight hourly candles, the long/short ratio shows that 60% of traders are still short.

This situation usually means two things: either the bears are waiting for a pullback to add to their positions, or they haven’t realized the trend has already changed. From the low of 0.107 to now, a group of traders has already missed the move. If it continues to break above the previous high of 0.21, it may force shorts to cover.

What I’m watching is whether trading volume can hold at this level. If the pullback comes on lower volume, it could mean the bulls are waiting for a better entry opportunity.

$MARSCOIN #空头挤压 #60% short
Click the small card below to quickly view the market👇

Behind the 42% surge, 60% of people are still betting on it falling.

MARSCOIN’s trading volume surged to $772 million today, with the price climbing from 0.095 to 0.196 before pulling back to 0.169. Looks strong? But the funding rate is only 0.0258%, and the long/short ratio shows 60% of positions are short.

What does that mean? Most people think this rally is over and are lining up to short it. The hourly chart has already closed three consecutive bearish candles, and it’s down 14% from the high.

I’ve seen too many situations like this: the price is still at a high level, but smart money has already started positioning the other way. I’m not saying it can’t keep running, but the risk-reward ratio for chasing longs is getting worse and worse.

$MARSCOIN #多空分歧 #60% short positions
Click the card below to quickly view the market👇

58% increase, but 60% of positions are short — this divergence is interesting.

USELESS has surged from 0.15 to 0.2879 over the past 8 hours, with trading volume hitting $890 million.
Normally, in a move this strong, longs should be in control.
But the long/short ratio shows 60% short positions and only 40% long positions.

What does this mean? Either smart money is positioning for a pullback at higher levels,
or shorts still haven’t realized how strong this momentum is.

The price has now pulled back to 0.247, down 14% from the high.
If bulls can hold the 0.23-0.24 range,
those 60% shorts may be forced to cover, which could push the price higher.

$USELESS #多空分歧 #60% short positions
Click the card below to quickly check the market👇

A 64% increase, but 60% of positions are still short — something feels off.

USELESS trading volume today surged to 873 million USDT, with the price moving from 0.15 up to 0.28 before pulling back to 0.257.
The hourly chart has already closed three consecutive green candles, indicating that buying pressure is continuing to enter.
But the long/short ratio shows that 60% of people are still holding short positions, while the funding rate is only 0.005%, meaning almost no one is paying.

This kind of divergence usually means two things: either shorts are waiting for a pullback to add positions,
or they still haven’t realized the trend has already changed.

I lean toward the latter — when most people are still bearish, the market often won’t reverse immediately.

$USELESS #空头陷阱 #60% short positions
Click the small card below to quickly view the market👇

A 60% surge, but more than half the people are shorting—kind of interesting.

Today, MARSCOIN’s trading volume hit 464 million U. The price moved from 0.059 up to 0.123, and it has now pulled back to 0.104. On the surface it looks like a strong breakout, but the short position ratio is 56%, higher than the longs.

More importantly, over the past 8 hours the price has actually been weakening. This kind of “it’s pumping hard, but nobody believes it” situation is either the main players luring longs, or the final shakeout right before a real breakout.

I’ll wait until the direction is clear before I take action—chasing it now is too risky.

$MARSCOIN #多空分歧 #60%涨幅
Click the small card below to quickly check the market trend👇

60% price increase, but the funding rate is only 0.009%—what does that mean?

When most people see BULLA rally, their first reaction is to chase longs,
but compared short-term and long-term signals, it’s 52% vs 48%, and almost nobody is extremely crowded.
Three consecutive hourly candles close green, and volume pushes to 107 million U. The price rises from 0.018 to 0.033, but the funding rate doesn’t keep up.

This kind of divergence usually indicates that the main players are quietly accumulating,
rather than a false breakout driven by FOMO from retail traders.
I’m watching the 0.030 level—if it holds, then we’ll look at 0.036.

$BULLA #低费率爆发 #60%
Click the small card below to quickly view the market行情👇

60% increase, but the hourly candlesticks have already been falling for three straight sessions—AKE is this just a shakeout, or a real pullback?

Price has dropped from a high of 0.0448 to around 0.014, yet the trading volume is still 1.14 billion USDT,
which suggests a major disagreement between bulls and bears. The funding rate is only 0.005%,
so it isn’t extremely extreme, but the long-vs-short ratio is 37% to 63%, with bears clearly in control.

A high-level pullback on heavy volume usually indicates that early profit-takers are exiting.
If it can’t quickly reclaim the 0.016–0.017 range next,
then in the short term it may continue to test support near 0.013.

$AKE #洗盘还是回调 #60%涨幅
Click the small card below to quickly check the行情👇