@Injective $INJ
INJ
5.02
+1.61%
Unlike a centralized exchange like Binance, Injective operates under a community governance model where holders of the INJ token have a voice and vote on all updates and critical changes to the protocol, including the definition of new market lists and fees.
Considering that Binance is one of the first and most important investors in Injective:
How does Binance balance its influence and strategic vision as a major investor with the principle of decentralized and permissionless governance of Injective, especially in decisions that could go against the direct interests of the centralized exchange (for example, token listings or fee modifications)?