Binance Square

Cami Cash

X : Cami_cash_
1.8K+ Following
10.3K+ Followers
3.8K+ Liked
719 Shared
All Content
--
See original
Security and compliance friction points @Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) ‎ Counterparty risk vs code risk: This question forces a CEX to compare its vulnerability to centralized hacks or fund confiscation with the code error risk of a decentralized protocol. ‎ ‎ Regulatory position: The permissionless nature of Injective allows the creation of unregulated derivatives markets, while its RWA infrastructure enables the creation of regulated markets. This creates a very interesting strategic and regulatory dilemma for Binance. ‎ ‎ Shared security: Injective's reliance on the security framework of Cosmos and the proof-of-stake mechanism is fundamentally different from Binance's private infrastructure security, generating a debate point about long-term robustness. #injective #Binance #Injective🔥 #BinanceSquareTalks #INJ
Security and compliance friction points @Injective $INJ

‎ Counterparty risk vs code risk: This question forces a CEX to compare its vulnerability to centralized hacks or fund confiscation with the code error risk of a decentralized protocol.

‎ Regulatory position: The permissionless nature of Injective allows the creation of unregulated derivatives markets, while its RWA infrastructure enables the creation of regulated markets. This creates a very interesting strategic and regulatory dilemma for Binance.

‎ Shared security: Injective's reliance on the security framework of Cosmos and the proof-of-stake mechanism is fundamentally different from Binance's private infrastructure security, generating a debate point about long-term robustness.
#injective #Binance #Injective🔥 #BinanceSquareTalks #INJ
See original
@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) After several security incidents at CEX and the growing global regulatory pressure, the on-chain security of Injective and its permissionless nature present themselves as a counterparty risk mitigation alternative for users. ‎Injective also benefits from the shared security of the Cosmos ecosystem, while Binance operates with its own security mechanisms and emergency funds. ‎ ‎In this evolving risk environment: ‎ ‎ How does Binance assess the systemic risk of centralization (counterparty risk, hacks to hot wallets) against the risks of smart contracts (bugs in the code) inherent to a DEX like Injective, and how does this assessment inform its investment strategy? ‎ ‎ In what way does Injective's approach to programmable regulatory compliance (e.g., whitelists for RWA) help or complicate Binance's global regulatory position, considering that Binance seeks a broad regulatory umbrella while Injective allows the creation of markets operating outside of it? #injective #WriteToEarnUpgrade #Write2Earn! #BinanceSquareFamily #Binance
@Injective $INJ

After several security incidents at CEX and the growing global regulatory pressure, the on-chain security of Injective and its permissionless nature present themselves as a counterparty risk mitigation alternative for users.
‎Injective also benefits from the shared security of the Cosmos ecosystem, while Binance operates with its own security mechanisms and emergency funds.

‎In this evolving risk environment:

‎ How does Binance assess the systemic risk of centralization (counterparty risk, hacks to hot wallets) against the risks of smart contracts (bugs in the code) inherent to a DEX like Injective, and how does this assessment inform its investment strategy?

‎ In what way does Injective's approach to programmable regulatory compliance (e.g., whitelists for RWA) help or complicate Binance's global regulatory position, considering that Binance seeks a broad regulatory umbrella while Injective allows the creation of markets operating outside of it?
#injective #WriteToEarnUpgrade #Write2Earn! #BinanceSquareFamily #Binance
See original
@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) How does Binance view the symbiotic relationship between the deep liquidity of its CEX derivatives markets and the permissionless infrastructure of Injective, and are there plans to utilize Injective's price oracles and liquidation mechanisms to strengthen or diversify Binance's own derivatives products? ‎ ‎ The heart of the business: Derivatives are at the center of a CEX's profits. Asking about the threat and opportunity posed by Injective in this sector goes to the core of Binance's business model. ‎ ‎ Product innovation: Injective allows listing derivatives on assets that Binance could not easily list due to regulatory restrictions (for example, decentralized futures on tokenized stocks, or exotic assets). This creates a competitive advantage for the DEX. ‎ ‎ Infrastructure integration: The question explores whether Binance could use Injective's core technology (its high-frequency oracles and execution engine) to enhance the robustness of its own derivatives services, turning competition into a technology partner. #injective #BinanceSquareTalks #Binance #FOMCWatch #CPIWatch
@Injective $INJ

How does Binance view the symbiotic relationship between the deep liquidity of its CEX derivatives markets and the permissionless infrastructure of Injective, and are there plans to utilize Injective's price oracles and liquidation mechanisms to strengthen or diversify Binance's own derivatives products?

‎ The heart of the business: Derivatives are at the center of a CEX's profits. Asking about the threat and opportunity posed by Injective in this sector goes to the core of Binance's business model.

‎ Product innovation: Injective allows listing derivatives on assets that Binance could not easily list due to regulatory restrictions (for example, decentralized futures on tokenized stocks, or exotic assets). This creates a competitive advantage for the DEX.

‎ Infrastructure integration: The question explores whether Binance could use Injective's core technology (its high-frequency oracles and execution engine) to enhance the robustness of its own derivatives services, turning competition into a technology partner.
#injective #BinanceSquareTalks #Binance #FOMCWatch #CPIWatch
See original
@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) Binance futures is a massive income engine for the exchange, dominating the centralized crypto derivatives market. ‎ Injective, being a layer 1 blockchain designed with an on-chain order book and focused on derivatives, perpetual futures, and options, offers a decentralized market with the ability to list any asset in the world ‎(including permissionless futures on RWA or synthetic assets). ‎ ‎Considering Binance's dominance in this sector: ‎ ‎ What is Binance's strategy to manage the potential liquidity outflow from the centralized derivatives market to the Injective ecosystem, where traders can access a wider and more customizable range of futures and options products? #injective #Binance #Write2Earn #BinanceSquareFamily #USChinaDeal
@Injective $INJ

Binance futures is a massive income engine for the exchange, dominating the centralized crypto derivatives market.
‎ Injective, being a layer 1 blockchain designed with an on-chain order book and focused on derivatives, perpetual futures, and options, offers a decentralized market with the ability to list any asset in the world
‎(including permissionless futures on RWA or synthetic assets).

‎Considering Binance's dominance in this sector:

‎ What is Binance's strategy to manage the potential liquidity outflow from the centralized derivatives market to the Injective ecosystem, where traders can access a wider and more customizable range of futures and options products?

#injective #Binance #Write2Earn #BinanceSquareFamily #USChinaDeal
See original
@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) To what extent does Binance believe that the need for a centralized exchange as the main access point will decrease when decentralized exchanges, like Injective, achieve liquidity equivalent to its off-chain but with the security of on-chain settlement? ‎ ‎ Key elements of this question ‎ ‎ The trading trilemma: The question challenges the concept that decentralized trading is always slow and costly. Injective is challenging this. ‎ ‎ Speed/UX parity: It forces Binance to consider what happens when its main advantage (speed and UX) is neutralized. ‎ ‎ The role of CEX: It questions the long-term need for a CEX when decentralized solutions can handle the volume and speed required by professional traders, making on-chain settlement the superior option. #injective #Binance #BinanceSquareFamily #BinanceSquareTalks #Write2Earn
@Injective $INJ

To what extent does Binance believe that the need for a centralized exchange as the main access point will decrease when decentralized exchanges, like Injective, achieve liquidity equivalent to its off-chain but with the security of on-chain settlement?

‎ Key elements of this question

‎ The trading trilemma: The question challenges the concept that decentralized trading is always slow and costly. Injective is challenging this.

‎ Speed/UX parity: It forces Binance to consider what happens when its main advantage (speed and UX) is neutralized.

‎ The role of CEX: It questions the long-term need for a CEX when decentralized solutions can handle the volume and speed required by professional traders, making on-chain settlement the superior option.

#injective #Binance #BinanceSquareFamily #BinanceSquareTalks #Write2Earn
See original
@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) Historically, centralized exchanges (CEX) like Binance have dominated due to their deep liquidity, low fees, and a fast and familiar user experience (UX), achieved at the cost of decentralization. ‎ ‎Injective, being a Layer 1 blockchain specifically built for trading (with low latency, 0 gas fees for trading, and a UX close to that of a CEX) aims to solve this trilemma. ‎ ‎For Binance: ‎ ‎ How do they assess Injective's ability to provide an on-chain trading experience that matches or exceeds the speed and efficiency of a CEX, eliminating one of the main barriers to the mass adoption of DeFi, and what strategy do they have to compete with this growing parity in performance? #injective #Binance #BinanceSquareFamily #BTCVSGOLD #Write2Earn!
@Injective $INJ

Historically, centralized exchanges (CEX) like Binance have dominated due to their deep liquidity, low fees, and a fast and familiar user experience (UX), achieved at the cost of decentralization.

‎Injective, being a Layer 1 blockchain specifically built for trading (with low latency, 0 gas fees for trading, and a UX close to that of a CEX) aims to solve this trilemma.

‎For Binance:

‎ How do they assess Injective's ability to provide an on-chain trading experience that matches or exceeds the speed and efficiency of a CEX, eliminating one of the main barriers to the mass adoption of DeFi, and what strategy do they have to compete with this growing parity in performance?

#injective #Binance #BinanceSquareFamily #BTCVSGOLD #Write2Earn!
See original
‎@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) What is the long-term value for Binance in facilitating the migration of institutional capital (through Binance Custody and other integrations) to a decentralized financial layer like Injective, instead of keeping that capital and trading volume within its centralized exchange? ‎ ‎ Strategic friction elements ‎ ‎ Infrastructure vs service: Injective is building the infrastructure (the highway) for decentralized institutional finance. Binance offers the centralized service (the gas station). The question addresses whether these two functions are complementary or if one will ultimately replace the other. ‎ ‎ Leveraging regulation: Injective's ability to offer programmable compliance (whitelists) directly on-chain is a significant advantage for institutions. Binance must decide whether this advantage of Injective is an asset for them or a competitive threat. ‎ ‎ The role of custody: The fact that Binance Custody integrates with Injective is the clearest proof of synergy, but it is also the point of greatest conflict: Binance is helping clients take their capital directly to their decentralized competitor. #injective #WriteToEarnUpgrade #BinanceSquareFamily #Binance
@Injective $INJ

What is the long-term value for Binance in facilitating the migration of institutional capital (through Binance Custody and other integrations) to a decentralized financial layer like Injective, instead of keeping that capital and trading volume within its centralized exchange?

‎ Strategic friction elements

‎ Infrastructure vs service: Injective is building the infrastructure (the highway) for decentralized institutional finance. Binance offers the centralized service (the gas station). The question addresses whether these two functions are complementary or if one will ultimately replace the other.

‎ Leveraging regulation: Injective's ability to offer programmable compliance (whitelists) directly on-chain is a significant advantage for institutions. Binance must decide whether this advantage of Injective is an asset for them or a competitive threat.

‎ The role of custody: The fact that Binance Custody integrates with Injective is the clearest proof of synergy, but it is also the point of greatest conflict: Binance is helping clients take their capital directly to their decentralized competitor.

#injective #WriteToEarnUpgrade #BinanceSquareFamily #Binance
See original
@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) Injective is implementing "institutional-grade" features such as the RWA module to create tokenized assets with whitelist functions at the protocol level, and has integrated Binance Custody to provide secure access for large clients. ‎For a giant CEX like Binance, whose main value lies in being the secure and regulated gateway for institutional capital: ‎ ‎How does the permissioned infrastructure that Injective is building to attract institutions not end up directly competing with the premium custody and regulated trading services offered by Binance itself? #injective #Binance #Write2Earn #USChinaDeal #FOMCWatch
@Injective $INJ

Injective is implementing "institutional-grade" features such as the RWA module to create tokenized assets with whitelist functions at the protocol level, and has integrated Binance Custody to provide secure access for large clients.
‎For a giant CEX like Binance, whose main value lies in being the secure and regulated gateway for institutional capital:

‎How does the permissioned infrastructure that Injective is building to attract institutions not end up directly competing with the premium custody and regulated trading services offered by Binance itself?

#injective #Binance #Write2Earn #USChinaDeal #FOMCWatch
See original
‎@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) To what extent does Binance consider the sovereignty of the Injective community to be a key strength, rather than an obstacle, for the scalability and rapid adoption of the protocol, unlike the vertical decision-making model of a CEX? ‎ ‎ Points of conflict and debate ‎ ‎ Power vs principle: Highlights the duality between the financial power of a corporate investor (Binance) and the fundamental principle of decentralization that gives control to the community (Injective). ‎ ‎ Decision speed: A CEX can make decisions instantly, a DEX like Injective requires community consensus. The question confronts Binance's perception of which model is more effective for long-term growth. ‎ ‎ Silent influence: Invites inquiry about the mechanisms, if any, that Binance uses to influence Injective's governance voting, which is a key dynamic in the DeFi space. #injective #BinanceSquareFamily #Write2Earn! #WriteToEarnUpgrade #USChinaDeal
@Injective $INJ

To what extent does Binance consider the sovereignty of the Injective community to be a key strength, rather than an obstacle, for the scalability and rapid adoption of the protocol, unlike the vertical decision-making model of a CEX?

‎ Points of conflict and debate

‎ Power vs principle: Highlights the duality between the financial power of a corporate investor (Binance) and the fundamental principle of decentralization that gives control to the community (Injective).

‎ Decision speed: A CEX can make decisions instantly, a DEX like Injective requires community consensus. The question confronts Binance's perception of which model is more effective for long-term growth.

‎ Silent influence: Invites inquiry about the mechanisms, if any, that Binance uses to influence Injective's governance voting, which is a key dynamic in the DeFi space.

#injective #BinanceSquareFamily #Write2Earn! #WriteToEarnUpgrade #USChinaDeal
See original
@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) Unlike a centralized exchange like Binance, Injective operates under a community governance model where holders of the INJ token have a voice and vote on all updates and critical changes to the protocol, including the definition of new market lists and fees. ‎ ‎Considering that Binance is one of the first and most important investors in Injective: ‎ ‎ How does Binance balance its influence and strategic vision as a major investor with the principle of decentralized and permissionless governance of Injective, especially in decisions that could go against the direct interests of the centralized exchange (for example, token listings or fee modifications)? #injective #FOMCWatch #USChinaDeal #Write2Earn! #Binance
@Injective $INJ

Unlike a centralized exchange like Binance, Injective operates under a community governance model where holders of the INJ token have a voice and vote on all updates and critical changes to the protocol, including the definition of new market lists and fees.

‎Considering that Binance is one of the first and most important investors in Injective:

‎ How does Binance balance its influence and strategic vision as a major investor with the principle of decentralized and permissionless governance of Injective, especially in decisions that could go against the direct interests of the centralized exchange (for example, token listings or fee modifications)?

#injective #FOMCWatch #USChinaDeal #Write2Earn! #Binance
See original
‎ @Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) Are there plans for a deeper integration that allows Binance users to directly access the innovative DeFi primitives and tokenized RWA markets being created on Injective, thus blurring the line between CEX and DEX? ‎ ‎ Why it touches key points ‎ ‎ The future of RWA: Real-world assets (RWA) are seen as the next big catalyst for the industry. Asking how a CEX handles a DEX backed by them leading innovation in this sector is very interesting. ‎ ‎ Bridge competition: The interoperability of Injective reduces dependence on centralized bridges or exchanges to move assets between ecosystems, which impacts Binance's traditional business model. ‎ ‎ CEX/DEX merger: This question explores the possibility of Binance using Injective not just as a partner but as a decentralized extension of its own services, which would be a significant paradigm shift. #injective #BinanceSquareFamily #BinanceSquareTalks #Binance #Write2Earn
@Injective $INJ

Are there plans for a deeper integration that allows Binance users to directly access the innovative DeFi primitives and tokenized RWA markets being created on Injective, thus blurring the line between CEX and DEX?

‎ Why it touches key points

‎ The future of RWA: Real-world assets (RWA) are seen as the next big catalyst for the industry. Asking how a CEX handles a DEX backed by them leading innovation in this sector is very interesting.

‎ Bridge competition: The interoperability of Injective reduces dependence on centralized bridges or exchanges to move assets between ecosystems, which impacts Binance's traditional business model.

‎ CEX/DEX merger: This question explores the possibility of Binance using Injective not just as a partner but as a decentralized extension of its own services, which would be a significant paradigm shift.

#injective #BinanceSquareFamily #BinanceSquareTalks #Binance #Write2Earn
See original
@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) Injective positions itself as a highly interoperable blockchain, capable of connecting diverse ecosystems (Ethereum, Cosmos, Solana) and is a pioneer in the tokenization of Real World Assets (RWA) through strategic partnerships. ‎ ‎For Binance, which operates as one of the main centralized "gateways" between traditional finance and cryptocurrencies: ‎ ‎ How does the platform view Injective's role as a critical decentralized bridge for RWA liquidity, and what risks or benefits does Binance perceive in supporting a decentralized exchange that could become the primary market for tokenized assets that traditionally required CEX intermediaries? #injective #BinanceBlockchainWeek #BinanceSquareFamily #Binance
@Injective $INJ

Injective positions itself as a highly interoperable blockchain, capable of connecting diverse ecosystems (Ethereum, Cosmos, Solana) and is a pioneer in the tokenization of Real World Assets (RWA) through strategic partnerships.

‎For Binance, which operates as one of the main centralized "gateways" between traditional finance and cryptocurrencies:

‎ How does the platform view Injective's role as a critical decentralized bridge for RWA liquidity, and what risks or benefits does Binance perceive in supporting a decentralized exchange that could become the primary market for tokenized assets that traditionally required CEX intermediaries?

#injective #BinanceBlockchainWeek #BinanceSquareFamily #Binance
See original
@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) How does the deflationary tokenomics of INJ influence its valuation as a strategic partner of Binance, beyond just the technology? ‎ ‎ Key points of the question ‎ ‎ Contrast of models: It parallels two burning mechanisms that, although seeking to reduce supply, are fed by fundamentally different sources: transparent on-chain usage (DEX) vs. corporate profits (CEX). ‎ ‎ Value capture: It highlights Injective's ability to capture the value of trading activity (commissions) and return it immediately to holders through burning. ‎ ‎ Strategic depth: It suggests that Injective's value for Binance is not only its DeFi technology but also how its economic design (the tokenomics of INJ) drives long-term holding and protocol security. #injective #BinanceSquareFamily #Binance #FOMCWatch #USChinaDeal
@Injective $INJ

How does the deflationary tokenomics of INJ influence its valuation as a strategic partner of Binance, beyond just the technology?

‎ Key points of the question

‎ Contrast of models: It parallels two burning mechanisms that, although seeking to reduce supply, are fed by fundamentally different sources: transparent on-chain usage (DEX) vs. corporate profits (CEX).

‎ Value capture: It highlights Injective's ability to capture the value of trading activity (commissions) and return it immediately to holders through burning.

‎ Strategic depth: It suggests that Injective's value for Binance is not only its DeFi technology but also how its economic design (the tokenomics of INJ) drives long-term holding and protocol security.

#injective #BinanceSquareFamily #Binance #FOMCWatch #USChinaDeal
See original
@Injective $INJ {spot}(INJUSDT) Injective (INJ) uses a weekly auction mechanism to burn 60% of the fees from its ecosystem, creating direct deflationary pressure on the token supply that benefits holders and the security of the network. ‎ ‎On the other hand, Binance has implemented quarterly burn mechanisms for its BNB (partly linked to CEX profits). ‎ ‎Considering these two models: ‎ What is Binance's perspective on the sustainability and efficiency of a burn mechanism directly linked to on-chain usage volume (like that of Injective) compared to its own approach, which is based on exchange profits? #injective #WriteToEarnUpgrade #Binance #Write2Earn #Injective🔥
@Injective $INJ

Injective (INJ) uses a weekly auction mechanism to burn 60% of the fees from its ecosystem, creating direct deflationary pressure on the token supply that benefits holders and the security of the network.

‎On the other hand, Binance has implemented quarterly burn mechanisms for its BNB (partly linked to CEX profits).

‎Considering these two models:
‎ What is Binance's perspective on the sustainability and efficiency of a burn mechanism directly linked to on-chain usage volume (like that of Injective) compared to its own approach, which is based on exchange profits?

#injective #WriteToEarnUpgrade #Binance #Write2Earn #Injective🔥
See original
Plasma: The ultimate solution against congestion that drives DeFi on Binance @Plasma $XPL {spot}(XPLUSDT) The network congestion and the rise of "gas fee" have been the biggest obstacles to the mass adoption of DeFi. Plasma provides a structural response that ensures the growth of the Binance ecosystem is sustainable, without falling into the trap of saturation. #Plasma #BinanceSquareFamily #BinanceSquareTalks #Binance
Plasma: The ultimate solution against congestion that drives DeFi on Binance
@Plasma $XPL

The network congestion and the rise of
"gas fee" have been the biggest obstacles to the mass adoption of DeFi.

Plasma provides a structural response that ensures the growth of the Binance ecosystem is sustainable, without falling into the trap of saturation.
#Plasma #BinanceSquareFamily #BinanceSquareTalks #Binance
See original
Activation of micro-finance and small investors: @Plasma $XPL {spot}(XPLUSDT) ‎ High commissions exclude small investors, making operations like staking or low-volume trading unprofitable. ‎ ‎ Plasma removes this barrier, allowing millions of users with lower capital to actively participate in yield farming and other DeFi protocols. ‎ ‎ It democratizes access to decentralized finance! #Plasma #BinanceSquareTalks #Binance
Activation of micro-finance and small investors: @Plasma $XPL

‎ High commissions exclude small investors, making operations like staking or low-volume trading unprofitable.

‎ Plasma removes this barrier, allowing millions of users with lower capital to actively participate in yield farming and other DeFi protocols.

‎ It democratizes access to decentralized finance!
#Plasma #BinanceSquareTalks #Binance
See original
Solvency and Fraud Proofs: @Plasma $XPL {spot}(XPLUSDT) ‎ ‎A central feature of Plasma's design is its Fraud Proofs. ‎ ‎ This means that if an operator tries to do something incorrect, the network can detect it and penalize them, ensuring that all funds can be safely withdrawn to the main chain. ‎ ‎This layer of solvency is crucial for generating institutional trust in Binance's DeFi protocols. #Plasma #PlasmaChain #Binance
Solvency and Fraud Proofs:
@Plasma $XPL

‎ ‎A central feature of Plasma's design is its Fraud Proofs.

‎ This means that if an operator tries to do something incorrect, the network can detect it and penalize them, ensuring that all funds can be safely withdrawn to the main chain.

‎This layer of solvency is crucial for generating institutional trust in Binance's DeFi protocols.
#Plasma #PlasmaChain #Binance
See original
Efficient capital for aggregate liquidity: @Plasma $XPL {spot}(XPLUSDT) By reducing the costs of incoming and outgoing transactions, Plasma ensures that the capital locked in liquidity pools and lending protocols is used much more efficiently. Greater capital efficiency translates into better APYs (yields) for liquidity providers and more competitive interest rates for borrowers, directly benefiting Binance users. #Plasma #BinanceSquareFamily
Efficient capital for aggregate liquidity:
@Plasma $XPL

By reducing the costs of incoming and outgoing transactions, Plasma ensures that the capital locked in liquidity pools and lending protocols is used much more efficiently.

Greater capital efficiency translates into better APYs (yields) for liquidity providers and more competitive interest rates for borrowers, directly benefiting Binance users.
#Plasma #BinanceSquareFamily
See original
Plasma not only makes the network faster, it makes it fairer, safer, and more profitable for all levels of capital. @Plasma $XPL {spot}(XPLUSDT) ‎It is the silent engine that ensures the explosive growth of DeFi on Binance is solid and accessible to everyone. ‎ ‎The future of DeFi is scalable and secure. ‎ ‎ Are you leveraging the potential that Plasma offers in your investment strategy on Binance? #Plasma #PlasmaXPL #Binance
Plasma not only makes the network faster, it makes it fairer, safer, and more profitable for all levels of capital.
@Plasma $XPL

‎It is the silent engine that ensures the explosive growth of DeFi on Binance is solid and accessible to everyone.

‎The future of DeFi is scalable and secure.

‎ Are you leveraging the potential that Plasma offers in your investment strategy on Binance?
#Plasma #PlasmaXPL #Binance
See original
Plasma: The interoperable engine that empowers developers on Binance @Plasma $XPL {spot}(XPLUSDT) The true value of a blockchain lies in its ability to connect with the outside world and attract the best developers. Plasma not only solves scalability issues, it is an open platform that fosters multi-chain innovation within the Binance ecosystem. #Plasma #FOMCWatch #Binance #BinanceSquareFamily #USChinaDeal
Plasma: The interoperable engine that empowers developers on Binance
@Plasma $XPL

The true value of a blockchain lies in its ability to connect with the outside world and attract the best developers.

Plasma not only solves scalability issues, it is an open platform that fosters multi-chain innovation within the Binance ecosystem.
#Plasma #FOMCWatch #Binance #BinanceSquareFamily #USChinaDeal
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

Mahnoorftima
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs