#seguridadblockchain
seguridadblockchain
32,388 views
27 Discussing
Hot
Latest
·
--
Zcash is back in the crypto convo today for a pretty unusual reason: a critical vulnerability in Orchard, its latest shielded pool, triggered a coordinated response across the entire ecosystem. According to the official community forum, a soft fork was first activated to temporarily disable Orchard, followed by a hard fork to fix the cryptographic circuit and restore full functionality. The key takeaway isn’t just the incident itself, but how it was handled: there’s no evidence of exploitation, no impact on the total supply was detected, and user funds remained safe.
That explains why the topic gained traction on Binance Square today. In a market where trust in infrastructure weighs as much as the narrative, a network that detects, isolates, and fixes a flaw without confirmed loss of funds sends a strong signal of operational maturity. It also leaves a handy lesson: in advanced crypto, response speed and coordination with exchanges, miners, and operators can be just as crucial as technical innovation.
In the market, the reaction remains highly volatile and not linear euphoria. ZEC hit a spot high of 644.51 USDT before pulling back to 598.97, while BTC dropped 2.13% in 24h to 65,340, and BNB slid 4.41% to 622. In Futures, the latest 1H candlestick for ZEC fell from 614.97 to 598.27, and the 4H remains below its recent opening, signaling a cooldown after the initial push. In other words: the market is rewarding the protocol’s responsiveness, but it still demands proof of stability after the event.
$ZEC $BTC $BNB
Educational Content. No financial advice.
#Zcash #PrivacidadCripto #SeguridadBlockchain #BinanceSquare
Zcash is back in the crypto convo today for a pretty unusual reason: a critical vulnerability in Orchard, its latest shielded pool, triggered a coordinated response across the entire ecosystem. According to the official community forum, a soft fork was first activated to temporarily disable Orchard, followed by a hard fork to fix the cryptographic circuit and restore full functionality. The key takeaway isn’t just the incident itself, but how it was handled: there’s no evidence of exploitation, no impact on the total supply was detected, and user funds remained safe.
That explains why the topic gained traction on Binance Square today. In a market where trust in infrastructure weighs as much as the narrative, a network that detects, isolates, and fixes a flaw without confirmed loss of funds sends a strong signal of operational maturity. It also leaves a handy lesson: in advanced crypto, response speed and coordination with exchanges, miners, and operators can be just as crucial as technical innovation.
In the market, the reaction remains highly volatile and not linear euphoria. ZEC hit a spot high of 644.51 USDT before pulling back to 598.97, while BTC dropped 2.13% in 24h to 65,340, and BNB slid 4.41% to 622. In Futures, the latest 1H candlestick for ZEC fell from 614.97 to 598.27, and the 4H remains below its recent opening, signaling a cooldown after the initial push. In other words: the market is rewarding the protocol’s responsiveness, but it still demands proof of stability after the event.
$ZEC $BTC $BNB
Educational Content. No financial advice.
#Zcash #PrivacidadCripto #SeguridadBlockchain #BinanceSquare
That explains why the topic gained traction on Binance Square today. In a market where trust in infrastructure weighs as much as the narrative, a network that detects, isolates, and fixes a flaw without confirmed loss of funds sends a strong signal of operational maturity. It also leaves a handy lesson: in advanced crypto, response speed and coordination with exchanges, miners, and operators can be just as crucial as technical innovation.
In the market, the reaction remains highly volatile and not linear euphoria. ZEC hit a spot high of 644.51 USDT before pulling back to 598.97, while BTC dropped 2.13% in 24h to 65,340, and BNB slid 4.41% to 622. In Futures, the latest 1H candlestick for ZEC fell from 614.97 to 598.27, and the 4H remains below its recent opening, signaling a cooldown after the initial push. In other words: the market is rewarding the protocol’s responsiveness, but it still demands proof of stability after the event.
$ZEC $BTC $BNB
Educational Content. No financial advice.
#Zcash #PrivacidadCripto #SeguridadBlockchain #BinanceSquare
96
The value of unified security Creating and protecting your own network from hacks is very difficult for new projects. The infrastructure of $DOT allows multiple blockchains to share the same ultra-secure defensive layer.
{future}(DOTUSDT)
#PolkadotWeb3 #SeguridadBlockchain
The value of unified security Creating and protecting your own network from hacks is very difficult for new projects. The infrastructure of $DOT allows multiple blockchains to share the same ultra-secure defensive layer.
#PolkadotWeb3 #SeguridadBlockchain
#PolkadotWeb3 #SeguridadBlockchain
1
64
Article
📰 GNOSIS: Security and Wisdom in the Blockchain World 🦉🔐✨1. What is GNOSIS?
GNOSIS is a pioneering project that has spent years building fundamental tools to make cryptocurrencies a safer, more accessible, and more trustworthy space. Its name comes from Greek and means “knowledge,” and that is precisely its mission: to give you total control and certainty over your digital assets 🧠🔗.
It's not just another coin; it's a platform that creates real solutions used by millions of people worldwide, especially when it comes to secure wallets, digital identity, and prediction markets.
📰 GNOSIS: Security and Wisdom in the Blockchain World 🦉🔐✨
1. What is GNOSIS?
GNOSIS is a pioneering project that has spent years building fundamental tools to make cryptocurrencies a safer, more accessible, and more trustworthy space. Its name comes from Greek and means “knowledge,” and that is precisely its mission: to give you total control and certainty over your digital assets 🧠🔗.
It's not just another coin; it's a platform that creates real solutions used by millions of people worldwide, especially when it comes to secure wallets, digital identity, and prediction markets.
GNOSIS is a pioneering project that has spent years building fundamental tools to make cryptocurrencies a safer, more accessible, and more trustworthy space. Its name comes from Greek and means “knowledge,” and that is precisely its mission: to give you total control and certainty over your digital assets 🧠🔗.
It's not just another coin; it's a platform that creates real solutions used by millions of people worldwide, especially when it comes to secure wallets, digital identity, and prediction markets.
140
·
--
Initia: what the team confirmed after the October 23 incident
In its October 24 update (08:46 UTC), Initia attributed the attack to a bug in its MoveVM script cache. According to the team, the attacker credited themselves with unbacked balances of WETH (wrapped ETH), iUSD, and USDC.
The reported estimate was around USD 2.7 million transferred via bridges before the pause. This is the estimated amount transferred, not a final audited loss figure. Initia said that no additional native INIT was issued.
In that statement, the mainnet and its rollups were still paused. The patch, audit, and full technical report were pending. The current operational status could not be verified here.
Context: the fact that no additional INIT was issued does not eliminate the risk to other assets or to the availability of funds. It is also wise to be wary of purported recovery forms and unofficial links.
Market snapshot: as of 25/10, 02:58 UTC, Binance spot showed INIT at 0.15941 USDT, up 15.657% over 24 hours. That rebound does not certify that the issue has been fixed: price and operational security are separate matters.
Sources: Initia (24/10) and Binance public data (25/10).
$INIT $ETH $USDC
Educational content. Not financial advice.
#Initia #SeguridadBlockchain #DeFi #Crypto
Initia: what the team confirmed after the October 23 incident
In its October 24 update (08:46 UTC), Initia attributed the attack to a bug in its MoveVM script cache. According to the team, the attacker credited themselves with unbacked balances of WETH (wrapped ETH), iUSD, and USDC.
The reported estimate was around USD 2.7 million transferred via bridges before the pause. This is the estimated amount transferred, not a final audited loss figure. Initia said that no additional native INIT was issued.
In that statement, the mainnet and its rollups were still paused. The patch, audit, and full technical report were pending. The current operational status could not be verified here.
Context: the fact that no additional INIT was issued does not eliminate the risk to other assets or to the availability of funds. It is also wise to be wary of purported recovery forms and unofficial links.
Market snapshot: as of 25/10, 02:58 UTC, Binance spot showed INIT at 0.15941 USDT, up 15.657% over 24 hours. That rebound does not certify that the issue has been fixed: price and operational security are separate matters.
Sources: Initia (24/10) and Binance public data (25/10).
$INIT $ETH $USDC
Educational content. Not financial advice.
#Initia #SeguridadBlockchain #DeFi #Crypto
In its October 24 update (08:46 UTC), Initia attributed the attack to a bug in its MoveVM script cache. According to the team, the attacker credited themselves with unbacked balances of WETH (wrapped ETH), iUSD, and USDC.
The reported estimate was around USD 2.7 million transferred via bridges before the pause. This is the estimated amount transferred, not a final audited loss figure. Initia said that no additional native INIT was issued.
In that statement, the mainnet and its rollups were still paused. The patch, audit, and full technical report were pending. The current operational status could not be verified here.
Context: the fact that no additional INIT was issued does not eliminate the risk to other assets or to the availability of funds. It is also wise to be wary of purported recovery forms and unofficial links.
Market snapshot: as of 25/10, 02:58 UTC, Binance spot showed INIT at 0.15941 USDT, up 15.657% over 24 hours. That rebound does not certify that the issue has been fixed: price and operational security are separate matters.
Sources: Initia (24/10) and Binance public data (25/10).
$INIT $ETH $USDC
Educational content. Not financial advice.
#Initia #SeguridadBlockchain #DeFi #Crypto
122
·
--
NEAR: a post-quantum test without changing the address
On October 1, 2026, Fireblocks published a report on a test on the NEAR mainnet: an account holding funds switched from an Ed25519 key to ML-DSA-65, a post-quantum signature scheme. It kept its address and then received and sent payments. That is the report’s date, not a launch happening today.
The rotation used two transactions: first, the new key was added; then, that key signed the removal of the old one. This confirmed it could operate before the old access was revoked. The assets remained in the same account throughout the change.
The scope is specific. NEP-645 documentation covers transaction signatures and access keys; validator keys and block signatures are outside this upgrade. Consensus and custody security require a separate assessment.
There are operational risks too: the signing system must be compatible. For the account type used, deleting the account and recreating it through a valid transfer can restore the original key. A demonstration on one account also does not prove that a mass migration of users is possible.
Market snapshot: on October 11 at 02:46 UTC, Binance Spot showed NEAR at 5.303 USDT (+6.12% over 24 hours), compared with BTC at +0.61%. The relative strength observed does not prove that the test caused the move or guarantee that it will continue.
$NEAR $BTC $USDT
Educational Content. Not financial advice.
#NEAR #SeguridadBlockchain #Criptografia #Poscuantica #EducacionCripto
NEAR: a post-quantum test without changing the address
On October 1, 2026, Fireblocks published a report on a test on the NEAR mainnet: an account holding funds switched from an Ed25519 key to ML-DSA-65, a post-quantum signature scheme. It kept its address and then received and sent payments. That is the report’s date, not a launch happening today.
The rotation used two transactions: first, the new key was added; then, that key signed the removal of the old one. This confirmed it could operate before the old access was revoked. The assets remained in the same account throughout the change.
The scope is specific. NEP-645 documentation covers transaction signatures and access keys; validator keys and block signatures are outside this upgrade. Consensus and custody security require a separate assessment.
There are operational risks too: the signing system must be compatible. For the account type used, deleting the account and recreating it through a valid transfer can restore the original key. A demonstration on one account also does not prove that a mass migration of users is possible.
Market snapshot: on October 11 at 02:46 UTC, Binance Spot showed NEAR at 5.303 USDT (+6.12% over 24 hours), compared with BTC at +0.61%. The relative strength observed does not prove that the test caused the move or guarantee that it will continue.
$NEAR $BTC $USDT
Educational Content. Not financial advice.
#NEAR #SeguridadBlockchain #Criptografia #Poscuantica #EducacionCripto
On October 1, 2026, Fireblocks published a report on a test on the NEAR mainnet: an account holding funds switched from an Ed25519 key to ML-DSA-65, a post-quantum signature scheme. It kept its address and then received and sent payments. That is the report’s date, not a launch happening today.
The rotation used two transactions: first, the new key was added; then, that key signed the removal of the old one. This confirmed it could operate before the old access was revoked. The assets remained in the same account throughout the change.
The scope is specific. NEP-645 documentation covers transaction signatures and access keys; validator keys and block signatures are outside this upgrade. Consensus and custody security require a separate assessment.
There are operational risks too: the signing system must be compatible. For the account type used, deleting the account and recreating it through a valid transfer can restore the original key. A demonstration on one account also does not prove that a mass migration of users is possible.
Market snapshot: on October 11 at 02:46 UTC, Binance Spot showed NEAR at 5.303 USDT (+6.12% over 24 hours), compared with BTC at +0.61%. The relative strength observed does not prove that the test caused the move or guarantee that it will continue.
$NEAR $BTC $USDT
Educational Content. Not financial advice.
#NEAR #SeguridadBlockchain #Criptografia #Poscuantica #EducacionCripto
1
214
·
--
XRPL discloses critical bug: patch was already released in September
On October 9, 2026, XRPL published details of a vulnerability that could improperly create XRP. The initial report was submitted on September 22 through its bug bounty program; the report credits Cayden Liao and Veria AI.
The issue affected xrpld 3.4.0 and earlier versions: an error when adding amounts could violate supply rules. RippleX reproduced it in a local environment and raised its severity to critical.
The fix arrived with xrpld 3.4.1 in September and took effect when each server was updated. The October 9 activation mentioned in the same report refers to a different bug, related to Batch. These are two separate fixes.
According to the team, no evidence of exploitation was found on any public network. This describes what was observed; it does not prove that the bug was never exploited. Server operators should use version 3.4.1 or later to stay synchronized with the network.
Market snapshot: on Binance Spot, at 06:47 UTC on October 10, XRP was trading at 1.4090 USDT (+0.47% in 24 hours); BTC was up 0.24%. These moves do not prove a reaction to the patch. A technical fix does not eliminate price risk either.
$XRP $BTC $USDT
Educational content. Not financial advice.
#XRP #XRPL #SeguridadBlockchain #Bitcoin #CryptoMarket
XRPL discloses critical bug: patch was already released in September
On October 9, 2026, XRPL published details of a vulnerability that could improperly create XRP. The initial report was submitted on September 22 through its bug bounty program; the report credits Cayden Liao and Veria AI.
The issue affected xrpld 3.4.0 and earlier versions: an error when adding amounts could violate supply rules. RippleX reproduced it in a local environment and raised its severity to critical.
The fix arrived with xrpld 3.4.1 in September and took effect when each server was updated. The October 9 activation mentioned in the same report refers to a different bug, related to Batch. These are two separate fixes.
According to the team, no evidence of exploitation was found on any public network. This describes what was observed; it does not prove that the bug was never exploited. Server operators should use version 3.4.1 or later to stay synchronized with the network.
Market snapshot: on Binance Spot, at 06:47 UTC on October 10, XRP was trading at 1.4090 USDT (+0.47% in 24 hours); BTC was up 0.24%. These moves do not prove a reaction to the patch. A technical fix does not eliminate price risk either.
$XRP $BTC $USDT
Educational content. Not financial advice.
#XRP #XRPL #SeguridadBlockchain #Bitcoin #CryptoMarket
On October 9, 2026, XRPL published details of a vulnerability that could improperly create XRP. The initial report was submitted on September 22 through its bug bounty program; the report credits Cayden Liao and Veria AI.
The issue affected xrpld 3.4.0 and earlier versions: an error when adding amounts could violate supply rules. RippleX reproduced it in a local environment and raised its severity to critical.
The fix arrived with xrpld 3.4.1 in September and took effect when each server was updated. The October 9 activation mentioned in the same report refers to a different bug, related to Batch. These are two separate fixes.
According to the team, no evidence of exploitation was found on any public network. This describes what was observed; it does not prove that the bug was never exploited. Server operators should use version 3.4.1 or later to stay synchronized with the network.
Market snapshot: on Binance Spot, at 06:47 UTC on October 10, XRP was trading at 1.4090 USDT (+0.47% in 24 hours); BTC was up 0.24%. These moves do not prove a reaction to the patch. A technical fix does not eliminate price risk either.
$XRP $BTC $USDT
Educational content. Not financial advice.
#XRP #XRPL #SeguridadBlockchain #Bitcoin #CryptoMarket
95
The Sandbox contains a bridge vulnerability on Base and BNB Chain
The Sandbox reported that an attacker was able to mint unbacked SAND on Base and BNB Smart Chain. The team disabled the bridges on both networks and isolated those tokens.
According to the published information, Ethereum and Polygon were not affected and the SAND locked on Ethereum remains intact. Bithumb also issued a warning regarding the anomalous activity.
Sources:
https://m-feed.bithumb.com/notice/1654575
https://thedefiant.io/news/hacks/the-sandbox-says-it-contained-bridge-exploit-that-minted-unbacked-sand-on-base-and-bsc
#SandboxSANDSuspectedInfiniteMintFlawOnBase #SAND #SeguridadBlockchain
The Sandbox contains a bridge vulnerability on Base and BNB Chain
The Sandbox reported that an attacker was able to mint unbacked SAND on Base and BNB Smart Chain. The team disabled the bridges on both networks and isolated those tokens.
According to the published information, Ethereum and Polygon were not affected and the SAND locked on Ethereum remains intact. Bithumb also issued a warning regarding the anomalous activity.
Sources:
https://m-feed.bithumb.com/notice/1654575
https://thedefiant.io/news/hacks/the-sandbox-says-it-contained-bridge-exploit-that-minted-unbacked-sand-on-base-and-bsc
#SandboxSANDSuspectedInfiniteMintFlawOnBase #SAND #SeguridadBlockchain
The Sandbox reported that an attacker was able to mint unbacked SAND on Base and BNB Smart Chain. The team disabled the bridges on both networks and isolated those tokens.
According to the published information, Ethereum and Polygon were not affected and the SAND locked on Ethereum remains intact. Bithumb also issued a warning regarding the anomalous activity.
Sources:
https://m-feed.bithumb.com/notice/1654575
https://thedefiant.io/news/hacks/the-sandbox-says-it-contained-bridge-exploit-that-minted-unbacked-sand-on-base-and-bsc
#SandboxSANDSuspectedInfiniteMintFlawOnBase #SAND #SeguridadBlockchain
1
44
·
--
Today, Binance Square is pushing a clear topic: technical trust is back in the spotlight regarding privacy coins. The hashtag around Monero and Zcash is trending as the market processes the Orchard vulnerability in Zcash, discovered on May 29 and patched in a coordinated effort on June 2. Beyond the initial shock, the key point is different: AI-assisted auditing has gone from being a promise to becoming a new layer of pressure for protocols where security, privacy, and verifiability must coexist.
The underlying takeaway is not that privacy is losing relevance, but that the market now demands more solid proof of resilience. This is why Monero is capturing additional attention: the same researcher who identified the flaw in Zcash said that Monero is next in line for audits. In other words, capital flow is responding not only to narrative but also to which chain seems better prepared to withstand a tough technical review.
In the market, Monero leads the reaction: XMR is up nearly 6.5% in 24h futures and maintains active open interest, a sign of sustained speculative participation. ZEC is also bouncing around 2.0%, but it continues to operate with high sensitivity post-event. Bitcoin is advancing around 1.0% and serves as a benchmark for moderate, not euphoric, risk appetite. If this rotation continues, privacy coins could start moving more due to technical trust than pure narrative.
$XMR $ZEC $BTC
Educational Content. No financial advice.
#Monero #Zcash #PrivacidadCripto #SeguridadBlockchain #BinanceSquare
Today, Binance Square is pushing a clear topic: technical trust is back in the spotlight regarding privacy coins. The hashtag around Monero and Zcash is trending as the market processes the Orchard vulnerability in Zcash, discovered on May 29 and patched in a coordinated effort on June 2. Beyond the initial shock, the key point is different: AI-assisted auditing has gone from being a promise to becoming a new layer of pressure for protocols where security, privacy, and verifiability must coexist.
The underlying takeaway is not that privacy is losing relevance, but that the market now demands more solid proof of resilience. This is why Monero is capturing additional attention: the same researcher who identified the flaw in Zcash said that Monero is next in line for audits. In other words, capital flow is responding not only to narrative but also to which chain seems better prepared to withstand a tough technical review.
In the market, Monero leads the reaction: XMR is up nearly 6.5% in 24h futures and maintains active open interest, a sign of sustained speculative participation. ZEC is also bouncing around 2.0%, but it continues to operate with high sensitivity post-event. Bitcoin is advancing around 1.0% and serves as a benchmark for moderate, not euphoric, risk appetite. If this rotation continues, privacy coins could start moving more due to technical trust than pure narrative.
$XMR $ZEC $BTC
Educational Content. No financial advice.
#Monero #Zcash #PrivacidadCripto #SeguridadBlockchain #BinanceSquare
The underlying takeaway is not that privacy is losing relevance, but that the market now demands more solid proof of resilience. This is why Monero is capturing additional attention: the same researcher who identified the flaw in Zcash said that Monero is next in line for audits. In other words, capital flow is responding not only to narrative but also to which chain seems better prepared to withstand a tough technical review.
In the market, Monero leads the reaction: XMR is up nearly 6.5% in 24h futures and maintains active open interest, a sign of sustained speculative participation. ZEC is also bouncing around 2.0%, but it continues to operate with high sensitivity post-event. Bitcoin is advancing around 1.0% and serves as a benchmark for moderate, not euphoric, risk appetite. If this rotation continues, privacy coins could start moving more due to technical trust than pure narrative.
$XMR $ZEC $BTC
Educational Content. No financial advice.
#Monero #Zcash #PrivacidadCripto #SeguridadBlockchain #BinanceSquare
69
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
1
#CanMicrosoftDeliverOnAI
273,736 views
2,184 Discussing
2
#CanGoogleDefindItsCore
156,783 views
1,592 Discussing
3
#EarningsSeason
5.8M views
28,204 Discussing
4
#BitcoinSurpasses$81K
8,652 views
55 Discussing
5
#RobinhoodFalls8.4%AfterItsResults
4,403 views
114 Discussing
6
#KOSPISurges6.63%BackAbove6000
4,662 views
121 Discussing
7
#DatavaultAICantWithdrawBitcoinFromBiconomy
6,081 views
118 Discussing
8
#FOMCWatch
9.3M views
29,276 Discussing
9
#SolanaETFsPostWorstDaySinceDecember
404 views
25 Discussing
10
#HKPlacesTokenizedFundSecondaryTradingUnderETFLikeFramework
1,325 views
35 Discussing