Qadeerrajpoot
2.2k Posts
Qadeerrajpoot
Report
Block User
Crypto expert, Breaking news alerts , Market insight trend.
Open Trade
Occasional Trader
8.8 Months
1 Following
151 Followers
1.5K+ Liked
Posts
Portfolio
Spot on - announced *Oct 15, 2026* from San Francisco.$AGT $SIREN $INJ
*Visa Direct goes live with stablecoins:*
Moves from *pilot (2025) to production (2026)* - first time Visa has a stablecoin product in *live commercial use on Visa Direct rail*
- Two pilots last year: prefunding (supply USDC to back your own Visa Direct activity) and payout (settle to recipient on stablecoin rails). *Prefunding is the one now live.*
*What it does:*
- Businesses can *prefund cross-border payouts with USDC in near real-time, 24/7*, instead of waiting for traditional banking funding windows
- Then settle to end user in local currency on receiving end
- Aimed at money transmitters, fintechs, banks, payment businesses needing just-in-time funding across borders
*Inyo Global - inaugural enabler:*
- SF-based payments infra provider, Visa Direct processor
- Integrated prefunding into its platform - clients use *same Inyo APIs* they already use
- Through one connection: onboard users, manage fraud/compliance, accept payments, send payouts across *180+ countries* via Visa Direct
- Quote from Inyo CPO/co-founder Robson Dantas: "a new way to fund their payouts, one that is available around the clock"
*Visa quote* - Global Head of Visa Direct Vira Platonova: "The next chapter for stablecoins is adoption. Over the last several years, we've worked with several partners... We're now seeing those efforts translate into live implementations"
Eligibility/geography restrictions apply - not every country in Visa Direct network has stablecoin prefunding yet. Initial asset is *USDC only*.
Spot on - announced *Oct 15, 2026* from San Francisco.$AGT $SIREN $INJ
*Visa Direct goes live with stablecoins:*
Moves from *pilot (2025) to production (2026)* - first time Visa has a stablecoin product in *live commercial use on Visa Direct rail*
- Two pilots last year: prefunding (supply USDC to back your own Visa Direct activity) and payout (settle to recipient on stablecoin rails). *Prefunding is the one now live.*
*What it does:*
- Businesses can *prefund cross-border payouts with USDC in near real-time, 24/7*, instead of waiting for traditional banking funding windows
- Then settle to end user in local currency on receiving end
- Aimed at money transmitters, fintechs, banks, payment businesses needing just-in-time funding across borders
*Inyo Global - inaugural enabler:*
- SF-based payments infra provider, Visa Direct processor
- Integrated prefunding into its platform - clients use *same Inyo APIs* they already use
- Through one connection: onboard users, manage fraud/compliance, accept payments, send payouts across *180+ countries* via Visa Direct
- Quote from Inyo CPO/co-founder Robson Dantas: "a new way to fund their payouts, one that is available around the clock"
*Visa quote* - Global Head of Visa Direct Vira Platonova: "The next chapter for stablecoins is adoption. Over the last several years, we've worked with several partners... We're now seeing those efforts translate into live implementations"
Eligibility/geography restrictions apply - not every country in Visa Direct network has stablecoin prefunding yet. Initial asset is *USDC only*.
*Visa Direct goes live with stablecoins:*
Moves from *pilot (2025) to production (2026)* - first time Visa has a stablecoin product in *live commercial use on Visa Direct rail*
- Two pilots last year: prefunding (supply USDC to back your own Visa Direct activity) and payout (settle to recipient on stablecoin rails). *Prefunding is the one now live.*
*What it does:*
- Businesses can *prefund cross-border payouts with USDC in near real-time, 24/7*, instead of waiting for traditional banking funding windows
- Then settle to end user in local currency on receiving end
- Aimed at money transmitters, fintechs, banks, payment businesses needing just-in-time funding across borders
*Inyo Global - inaugural enabler:*
- SF-based payments infra provider, Visa Direct processor
- Integrated prefunding into its platform - clients use *same Inyo APIs* they already use
- Through one connection: onboard users, manage fraud/compliance, accept payments, send payouts across *180+ countries* via Visa Direct
- Quote from Inyo CPO/co-founder Robson Dantas: "a new way to fund their payouts, one that is available around the clock"
*Visa quote* - Global Head of Visa Direct Vira Platonova: "The next chapter for stablecoins is adoption. Over the last several years, we've worked with several partners... We're now seeing those efforts translate into live implementations"
Eligibility/geography restrictions apply - not every country in Visa Direct network has stablecoin prefunding yet. Initial asset is *USDC only*.
316
Yep that's Hacken's Q3 2026 report published Oct 15.
*Confirmed:*$AGT $SIREN $TIA
- *$1.18B across 107 incidents* in Q3 2026 - worst quarter since *Q1 2025 ($1.6B, driven by $1.4B Bybit hack by North Korea)*
*Big 4 made up ∼80% of losses:*
- *Bitget: $387M* - supplier compromise
- *Liquid Network: $320M* exploit
- *Tectonic: $120M* exploit on Cronos
- *Coldcard firmware vuln: ∼$115M* estimated losses
*Root cause is the newsworthy part:*
- *77% = ∼$906M* attributed to *compromised suppliers / dev tools / public fixes not deployed / components outside security reviews* - not classic smart contract bugs
- Smart contracts still most _frequent_: *71 incidents, $228M* - but less $ impact
- Median loss *$670k*, 98 incidents <$10M
*Recoveries - better than it sounds:*
- *$387M (33%) returned or reversed:*
- Liquid: self-proclaimed white hats returned *$272M (85%)*
- Tectonic: Cronos validators *rolled back 114 minutes of chain history*, reversing *$111.2M of $120.4M*
- Circle/Tether froze *$340k* from Bitget theft
- *$410M covered by operators from own funds:*
- Bitget protection fund *$387M*
- Triple-A, Coinsbuy, TAC repaid *∼$22M*
- *$384M (32%) still not returned nor covered* - remains with attackers
Yep that's Hacken's Q3 2026 report published Oct 15.
*Confirmed:*$AGT $SIREN $TIA
- *$1.18B across 107 incidents* in Q3 2026 - worst quarter since *Q1 2025 ($1.6B, driven by $1.4B Bybit hack by North Korea)*
*Big 4 made up ∼80% of losses:*
- *Bitget: $387M* - supplier compromise
- *Liquid Network: $320M* exploit
- *Tectonic: $120M* exploit on Cronos
- *Coldcard firmware vuln: ∼$115M* estimated losses
*Root cause is the newsworthy part:*
- *77% = ∼$906M* attributed to *compromised suppliers / dev tools / public fixes not deployed / components outside security reviews* - not classic smart contract bugs
- Smart contracts still most _frequent_: *71 incidents, $228M* - but less $ impact
- Median loss *$670k*, 98 incidents <$10M
*Recoveries - better than it sounds:*
- *$387M (33%) returned or reversed:*
- Liquid: self-proclaimed white hats returned *$272M (85%)*
- Tectonic: Cronos validators *rolled back 114 minutes of chain history*, reversing *$111.2M of $120.4M*
- Circle/Tether froze *$340k* from Bitget theft
- *$410M covered by operators from own funds:*
- Bitget protection fund *$387M*
- Triple-A, Coinsbuy, TAC repaid *∼$22M*
- *$384M (32%) still not returned nor covered* - remains with attackers
*Confirmed:*$AGT $SIREN $TIA
- *$1.18B across 107 incidents* in Q3 2026 - worst quarter since *Q1 2025 ($1.6B, driven by $1.4B Bybit hack by North Korea)*
*Big 4 made up ∼80% of losses:*
- *Bitget: $387M* - supplier compromise
- *Liquid Network: $320M* exploit
- *Tectonic: $120M* exploit on Cronos
- *Coldcard firmware vuln: ∼$115M* estimated losses
*Root cause is the newsworthy part:*
- *77% = ∼$906M* attributed to *compromised suppliers / dev tools / public fixes not deployed / components outside security reviews* - not classic smart contract bugs
- Smart contracts still most _frequent_: *71 incidents, $228M* - but less $ impact
- Median loss *$670k*, 98 incidents <$10M
*Recoveries - better than it sounds:*
- *$387M (33%) returned or reversed:*
- Liquid: self-proclaimed white hats returned *$272M (85%)*
- Tectonic: Cronos validators *rolled back 114 minutes of chain history*, reversing *$111.2M of $120.4M*
- Circle/Tether froze *$340k* from Bitget theft
- *$410M covered by operators from own funds:*
- Bitget protection fund *$387M*
- Triple-A, Coinsbuy, TAC repaid *∼$22M*
- *$384M (32%) still not returned nor covered* - remains with attackers
536
Yes, but the quote is slightly misframed in your post - it's optimistic long-term, not a doom warning.$AGT $SIREN $TIA
*Fed Chair Kevin Warsh - Bangkok, Oct 16, 2026* - IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings, fireside chat with IMF MD Kristalina Georgieva:
"I'd say the advent of this new technology is probably the most consequential change to the US and the global economy in my lifetime"
> "The path from where we are to there is likely to be a *very bumpy* one, bumpy in our understanding of the technology, bumpy because we really don't know what the market structure is going to be"
*His full take - not just bumpy:*
- *Near-term = inflationary:* AI hits *demand side first* - massive capex surge driving prices up before productivity shows up. He said Fed takes this "soberly, responsibly"
- *Medium-term = positive supply shock:* "huge benefit to the global economy", "make economies and countries that put it to good use more productive" and wealthier
- *Jobs:* effect in next 12-18 months unclear
- Fed will itself use AI to better analyze data for monetary policy
- Also joked: "You pronounce it AI, in the US we now pronounce it SI" - referencing Trump's push to call it Super Intelligence
*Context:* This was right after September hike to *3.75%-4%*. Warsh declined to give forward guidance for Oct 27-28 meeting - markets pricing ∼72-87% chance of *hold* then, 25bp hike in December. He also announced Fed AI task force field hearing *Nov 16 in SF Bay Area* (members include Marc Andreessen, Stanford's Charles Jones, Xbox CEO Asha Sharma).
So not "regulators lack insight = crash alert" - he said bumpy _because_ we don't know the market structure yet, but long-run = more wealth.
Yes, but the quote is slightly misframed in your post - it's optimistic long-term, not a doom warning.$AGT $SIREN $TIA
*Fed Chair Kevin Warsh - Bangkok, Oct 16, 2026* - IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings, fireside chat with IMF MD Kristalina Georgieva:
"I'd say the advent of this new technology is probably the most consequential change to the US and the global economy in my lifetime"
> "The path from where we are to there is likely to be a *very bumpy* one, bumpy in our understanding of the technology, bumpy because we really don't know what the market structure is going to be"
*His full take - not just bumpy:*
- *Near-term = inflationary:* AI hits *demand side first* - massive capex surge driving prices up before productivity shows up. He said Fed takes this "soberly, responsibly"
- *Medium-term = positive supply shock:* "huge benefit to the global economy", "make economies and countries that put it to good use more productive" and wealthier
- *Jobs:* effect in next 12-18 months unclear
- Fed will itself use AI to better analyze data for monetary policy
- Also joked: "You pronounce it AI, in the US we now pronounce it SI" - referencing Trump's push to call it Super Intelligence
*Context:* This was right after September hike to *3.75%-4%*. Warsh declined to give forward guidance for Oct 27-28 meeting - markets pricing ∼72-87% chance of *hold* then, 25bp hike in December. He also announced Fed AI task force field hearing *Nov 16 in SF Bay Area* (members include Marc Andreessen, Stanford's Charles Jones, Xbox CEO Asha Sharma).
So not "regulators lack insight = crash alert" - he said bumpy _because_ we don't know the market structure yet, but long-run = more wealth.
*Fed Chair Kevin Warsh - Bangkok, Oct 16, 2026* - IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings, fireside chat with IMF MD Kristalina Georgieva:
"I'd say the advent of this new technology is probably the most consequential change to the US and the global economy in my lifetime"
> "The path from where we are to there is likely to be a *very bumpy* one, bumpy in our understanding of the technology, bumpy because we really don't know what the market structure is going to be"
*His full take - not just bumpy:*
- *Near-term = inflationary:* AI hits *demand side first* - massive capex surge driving prices up before productivity shows up. He said Fed takes this "soberly, responsibly"
- *Medium-term = positive supply shock:* "huge benefit to the global economy", "make economies and countries that put it to good use more productive" and wealthier
- *Jobs:* effect in next 12-18 months unclear
- Fed will itself use AI to better analyze data for monetary policy
- Also joked: "You pronounce it AI, in the US we now pronounce it SI" - referencing Trump's push to call it Super Intelligence
*Context:* This was right after September hike to *3.75%-4%*. Warsh declined to give forward guidance for Oct 27-28 meeting - markets pricing ∼72-87% chance of *hold* then, 25bp hike in December. He also announced Fed AI task force field hearing *Nov 16 in SF Bay Area* (members include Marc Andreessen, Stanford's Charles Jones, Xbox CEO Asha Sharma).
So not "regulators lack insight = crash alert" - he said bumpy _because_ we don't know the market structure yet, but long-run = more wealth.
427
Yes FSC announced *Oct 15, 2026*.
*What happened:*$AGT $SIREN $TIA
Trigger: Security incidents at *16 companies*, including crypto exchanges. Then FSC did industry-wide review of *555 financial companies*.
- Found *cybersecurity deficiencies at 130 firms*, with *∼100,000 pieces of customer info exposed* - names, contact details, resident registration numbers (national IDs), emails.
*Who was named:*
Crypto: *Streami* (operator of Gopax exchange) and *Prabang / Pravang* (trading platform that disclosed Oct 2 hack leaking personal info)
- Also banks: *Shinhan, Kookmin, Busan, Hana*, plus savings banks Yegaram, Welcome, DB, OK, Hyundai Capital etc.
*New regime proposed (not yet effective):*
*Twice-yearly vulnerability assessments* for large financial institutions - up from once yearly (external websites already 2x, now internal systems too)
- *Unscheduled inspections* allowed when urgent threats emerge
- *Enhanced info-sharing* between govt and private sector
- *AI-powered monitoring* for SMEs who lack resources
- *Stronger executive accountability* - defining cybersecurity duties of senior execs, treating failures as governance failures
FSC said it's still investigating if attacks used *AI* and if same attacker group hit multiple firms.
And yes, crypto VASPs will face *same rigorous checks as banks* under this - which will raise compliance costs, especially for smaller Korean exchanges. No exact effective date yet - it's a reform plan out for implementation.
Separately, South Korea also moved to *block 27 overseas crypto websites* including KuCoin and MEXC in same week for operating without VASP registration.
Yes FSC announced *Oct 15, 2026*.
*What happened:*$AGT $SIREN $TIA
Trigger: Security incidents at *16 companies*, including crypto exchanges. Then FSC did industry-wide review of *555 financial companies*.
- Found *cybersecurity deficiencies at 130 firms*, with *∼100,000 pieces of customer info exposed* - names, contact details, resident registration numbers (national IDs), emails.
*Who was named:*
Crypto: *Streami* (operator of Gopax exchange) and *Prabang / Pravang* (trading platform that disclosed Oct 2 hack leaking personal info)
- Also banks: *Shinhan, Kookmin, Busan, Hana*, plus savings banks Yegaram, Welcome, DB, OK, Hyundai Capital etc.
*New regime proposed (not yet effective):*
*Twice-yearly vulnerability assessments* for large financial institutions - up from once yearly (external websites already 2x, now internal systems too)
- *Unscheduled inspections* allowed when urgent threats emerge
- *Enhanced info-sharing* between govt and private sector
- *AI-powered monitoring* for SMEs who lack resources
- *Stronger executive accountability* - defining cybersecurity duties of senior execs, treating failures as governance failures
FSC said it's still investigating if attacks used *AI* and if same attacker group hit multiple firms.
And yes, crypto VASPs will face *same rigorous checks as banks* under this - which will raise compliance costs, especially for smaller Korean exchanges. No exact effective date yet - it's a reform plan out for implementation.
Separately, South Korea also moved to *block 27 overseas crypto websites* including KuCoin and MEXC in same week for operating without VASP registration.
*What happened:*$AGT $SIREN $TIA
Trigger: Security incidents at *16 companies*, including crypto exchanges. Then FSC did industry-wide review of *555 financial companies*.
- Found *cybersecurity deficiencies at 130 firms*, with *∼100,000 pieces of customer info exposed* - names, contact details, resident registration numbers (national IDs), emails.
*Who was named:*
Crypto: *Streami* (operator of Gopax exchange) and *Prabang / Pravang* (trading platform that disclosed Oct 2 hack leaking personal info)
- Also banks: *Shinhan, Kookmin, Busan, Hana*, plus savings banks Yegaram, Welcome, DB, OK, Hyundai Capital etc.
*New regime proposed (not yet effective):*
*Twice-yearly vulnerability assessments* for large financial institutions - up from once yearly (external websites already 2x, now internal systems too)
- *Unscheduled inspections* allowed when urgent threats emerge
- *Enhanced info-sharing* between govt and private sector
- *AI-powered monitoring* for SMEs who lack resources
- *Stronger executive accountability* - defining cybersecurity duties of senior execs, treating failures as governance failures
FSC said it's still investigating if attacks used *AI* and if same attacker group hit multiple firms.
And yes, crypto VASPs will face *same rigorous checks as banks* under this - which will raise compliance costs, especially for smaller Korean exchanges. No exact effective date yet - it's a reform plan out for implementation.
Separately, South Korea also moved to *block 27 overseas crypto websites* including KuCoin and MEXC in same week for operating without VASP registration.
371
Numbers are close but a bit inflated - here's the verified move:$AGT $SIREN $TIA
*Basic Attention Token (BAT) - this week's leader:*
- *+81-98% in 7 days* depending on venue (CoinDCX says +98% to Oct 14, Bitget says +81.29%, OKX shows +50.80% last 7d but +173% in 30d)
- Reason: *not a Brave announcement* - purely technical. Broke out above a long descending channel, plus *+60% single-day expansion in perp futures Open Interest on Oct 10* and elevated spot turnover. RSI hit *85* (overbought) on Oct 13.
- Price: ~ *$0.20* now (up from ∼$0.10). AMBCrypto warns $2.5M spot inflows to exchanges Oct 13 = profit-taking risk. If holds $0.20, target $0.28, downside $0.10.
*Rest of your list:*
- *ZKsync (ZK): +12.53% daily* on Oct 15 - was top daily gainer among top 200 that day, not +44% weekly. Weekly trend ~ +4% yesterday.
- *Celestia (TIA): +27.37% in last 24h* at last snapshot (price $0.6859), so weekly +35% is plausible
- *Walrus (WAL)* - the data chain, not Walrus Pump Co stock - was in top 10 gainers Oct 13-15 with ~+30-32% moves
*Context you asked about:*
The "privacy and L2" narrative fits - BAT is privacy-ads token on Brave, ZKsync is ZK-rollup L2. Optimism (OP) and EigenCloud/EigenLayer (EIGEN) were also up double-digits Oct 14-15 as ETH L2s bounced after BTC dipped -3.44% that day.
Overall market that week: BTC down to $63k area, but *81% of coins gained* on Oct 15 - alt-rotation.
BAT still *-89.6% from ATH $1.90 / A$2.78 in Nov 2021*, so this is a bounce from deep undervaluation.
Numbers are close but a bit inflated - here's the verified move:$AGT $SIREN $TIA
*Basic Attention Token (BAT) - this week's leader:*
- *+81-98% in 7 days* depending on venue (CoinDCX says +98% to Oct 14, Bitget says +81.29%, OKX shows +50.80% last 7d but +173% in 30d)
- Reason: *not a Brave announcement* - purely technical. Broke out above a long descending channel, plus *+60% single-day expansion in perp futures Open Interest on Oct 10* and elevated spot turnover. RSI hit *85* (overbought) on Oct 13.
- Price: ~ *$0.20* now (up from ∼$0.10). AMBCrypto warns $2.5M spot inflows to exchanges Oct 13 = profit-taking risk. If holds $0.20, target $0.28, downside $0.10.
*Rest of your list:*
- *ZKsync (ZK): +12.53% daily* on Oct 15 - was top daily gainer among top 200 that day, not +44% weekly. Weekly trend ~ +4% yesterday.
- *Celestia (TIA): +27.37% in last 24h* at last snapshot (price $0.6859), so weekly +35% is plausible
- *Walrus (WAL)* - the data chain, not Walrus Pump Co stock - was in top 10 gainers Oct 13-15 with ~+30-32% moves
*Context you asked about:*
The "privacy and L2" narrative fits - BAT is privacy-ads token on Brave, ZKsync is ZK-rollup L2. Optimism (OP) and EigenCloud/EigenLayer (EIGEN) were also up double-digits Oct 14-15 as ETH L2s bounced after BTC dipped -3.44% that day.
Overall market that week: BTC down to $63k area, but *81% of coins gained* on Oct 15 - alt-rotation.
BAT still *-89.6% from ATH $1.90 / A$2.78 in Nov 2021*, so this is a bounce from deep undervaluation.
*Basic Attention Token (BAT) - this week's leader:*
- *+81-98% in 7 days* depending on venue (CoinDCX says +98% to Oct 14, Bitget says +81.29%, OKX shows +50.80% last 7d but +173% in 30d)
- Reason: *not a Brave announcement* - purely technical. Broke out above a long descending channel, plus *+60% single-day expansion in perp futures Open Interest on Oct 10* and elevated spot turnover. RSI hit *85* (overbought) on Oct 13.
- Price: ~ *$0.20* now (up from ∼$0.10). AMBCrypto warns $2.5M spot inflows to exchanges Oct 13 = profit-taking risk. If holds $0.20, target $0.28, downside $0.10.
*Rest of your list:*
- *ZKsync (ZK): +12.53% daily* on Oct 15 - was top daily gainer among top 200 that day, not +44% weekly. Weekly trend ~ +4% yesterday.
- *Celestia (TIA): +27.37% in last 24h* at last snapshot (price $0.6859), so weekly +35% is plausible
- *Walrus (WAL)* - the data chain, not Walrus Pump Co stock - was in top 10 gainers Oct 13-15 with ~+30-32% moves
*Context you asked about:*
The "privacy and L2" narrative fits - BAT is privacy-ads token on Brave, ZKsync is ZK-rollup L2. Optimism (OP) and EigenCloud/EigenLayer (EIGEN) were also up double-digits Oct 14-15 as ETH L2s bounced after BTC dipped -3.44% that day.
Overall market that week: BTC down to $63k area, but *81% of coins gained* on Oct 15 - alt-rotation.
BAT still *-89.6% from ATH $1.90 / A$2.78 in Nov 2021*, so this is a bounce from deep undervaluation.
393
Accurate announced Oct 15, 2026.
*Grayscale x Republic:*$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
- *Distribution deal* - Grayscale funds sold via Republic's onchain platform
- *3 products initially:*
- *Grayscale DeFi Fund (DEFG)* - market-cap-weighted basket: *UNI, AAVE, ONDO, ENA, CRV, LDO* (Uniswap, Aave, Ondo, Ethena, Curve, Lido DAO)
- *Grayscale Decentralized AI Fund* - *NEAR, TAO, RENDER, FIL* (Near, Bittensor, Render, Filecoin)
- *Grayscale Data Network Trust* - single-asset *DATA* token (DATA Network - data ownership / licensing for AI training)
- *Terms:* *$2,500 minimum* listed on Republic, US = *accredited investors only* (income/net worth/professional cert verified). Non-US persons also eligible via Republic.
- *Structure:* These are *private placements, not public ETFs* - they don't trade on exchanges, carry resale restrictions, limited liquidity, speculative risk, "risk of total loss" per Grayscale disclosure. You get exposure without buying/storing tokens yourself.
- *Quote:* Republic co-CEO Andrew Durgee: "provides our user base with a simple way to add diversified digital asset exposure early in the life cycle of these funds, a time traditionally limited to institutional investors." Grayscale CEO Peter Mintzberg: expands access to differentiated strategies.
Grayscale is pushing from single-asset (GBTC) to thematic active funds - they met with regulators Oct 12 on Investment Company Act products too.
Accurate announced Oct 15, 2026.
*Grayscale x Republic:*$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
- *Distribution deal* - Grayscale funds sold via Republic's onchain platform
- *3 products initially:*
- *Grayscale DeFi Fund (DEFG)* - market-cap-weighted basket: *UNI, AAVE, ONDO, ENA, CRV, LDO* (Uniswap, Aave, Ondo, Ethena, Curve, Lido DAO)
- *Grayscale Decentralized AI Fund* - *NEAR, TAO, RENDER, FIL* (Near, Bittensor, Render, Filecoin)
- *Grayscale Data Network Trust* - single-asset *DATA* token (DATA Network - data ownership / licensing for AI training)
- *Terms:* *$2,500 minimum* listed on Republic, US = *accredited investors only* (income/net worth/professional cert verified). Non-US persons also eligible via Republic.
- *Structure:* These are *private placements, not public ETFs* - they don't trade on exchanges, carry resale restrictions, limited liquidity, speculative risk, "risk of total loss" per Grayscale disclosure. You get exposure without buying/storing tokens yourself.
- *Quote:* Republic co-CEO Andrew Durgee: "provides our user base with a simple way to add diversified digital asset exposure early in the life cycle of these funds, a time traditionally limited to institutional investors." Grayscale CEO Peter Mintzberg: expands access to differentiated strategies.
Grayscale is pushing from single-asset (GBTC) to thematic active funds - they met with regulators Oct 12 on Investment Company Act products too.
*Grayscale x Republic:*$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
- *Distribution deal* - Grayscale funds sold via Republic's onchain platform
- *3 products initially:*
- *Grayscale DeFi Fund (DEFG)* - market-cap-weighted basket: *UNI, AAVE, ONDO, ENA, CRV, LDO* (Uniswap, Aave, Ondo, Ethena, Curve, Lido DAO)
- *Grayscale Decentralized AI Fund* - *NEAR, TAO, RENDER, FIL* (Near, Bittensor, Render, Filecoin)
- *Grayscale Data Network Trust* - single-asset *DATA* token (DATA Network - data ownership / licensing for AI training)
- *Terms:* *$2,500 minimum* listed on Republic, US = *accredited investors only* (income/net worth/professional cert verified). Non-US persons also eligible via Republic.
- *Structure:* These are *private placements, not public ETFs* - they don't trade on exchanges, carry resale restrictions, limited liquidity, speculative risk, "risk of total loss" per Grayscale disclosure. You get exposure without buying/storing tokens yourself.
- *Quote:* Republic co-CEO Andrew Durgee: "provides our user base with a simple way to add diversified digital asset exposure early in the life cycle of these funds, a time traditionally limited to institutional investors." Grayscale CEO Peter Mintzberg: expands access to differentiated strategies.
Grayscale is pushing from single-asset (GBTC) to thematic active funds - they met with regulators Oct 12 on Investment Company Act products too.
451
Confirmed announced *Oct 15, 2026*.
*Stripe + Plasma:*$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
- *What:* Stripe expanding its stablecoin card infra, Plasma (Plasma Network + Plasma One neobank) joining as *design partner*
- *Goal:* Spend balances you already hold without routing everything through USD first - cut conversion / FX fees. Future version will *auto-select currency* at checkout.
*Supports:*
- *Fiat:* USD, EUR, BRL, MXN, COP (some reports also list GBP in early tests)
- *Stablecoins:* OUSD + eligible *GENIUS Act-compliant* stablecoins like USDC
*Coverage:*
- Live in *30+ countries today*, targeting *100+ in 2027*
- Stripe says its stablecoin card spend is already *∼$1.2B monthly* in 2026, powered by Bridge acquisition in 2024
Quotes:
- Plasma CEO Paul Faecks: "spend like a local, anywhere"
- Stripe Crypto head Henri Stern (also Privy co-founder/CEO): "giving businesses the infrastructure to offer cards across currencies and markets without having to build it themselves"
So your LatAm + Europe angle is right - BRL/MXN/COP + EUR/USD is exactly the focus.
Confirmed announced *Oct 15, 2026*.
*Stripe + Plasma:*$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
- *What:* Stripe expanding its stablecoin card infra, Plasma (Plasma Network + Plasma One neobank) joining as *design partner*
- *Goal:* Spend balances you already hold without routing everything through USD first - cut conversion / FX fees. Future version will *auto-select currency* at checkout.
*Supports:*
- *Fiat:* USD, EUR, BRL, MXN, COP (some reports also list GBP in early tests)
- *Stablecoins:* OUSD + eligible *GENIUS Act-compliant* stablecoins like USDC
*Coverage:*
- Live in *30+ countries today*, targeting *100+ in 2027*
- Stripe says its stablecoin card spend is already *∼$1.2B monthly* in 2026, powered by Bridge acquisition in 2024
Quotes:
- Plasma CEO Paul Faecks: "spend like a local, anywhere"
- Stripe Crypto head Henri Stern (also Privy co-founder/CEO): "giving businesses the infrastructure to offer cards across currencies and markets without having to build it themselves"
So your LatAm + Europe angle is right - BRL/MXN/COP + EUR/USD is exactly the focus.
*Stripe + Plasma:*$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
- *What:* Stripe expanding its stablecoin card infra, Plasma (Plasma Network + Plasma One neobank) joining as *design partner*
- *Goal:* Spend balances you already hold without routing everything through USD first - cut conversion / FX fees. Future version will *auto-select currency* at checkout.
*Supports:*
- *Fiat:* USD, EUR, BRL, MXN, COP (some reports also list GBP in early tests)
- *Stablecoins:* OUSD + eligible *GENIUS Act-compliant* stablecoins like USDC
*Coverage:*
- Live in *30+ countries today*, targeting *100+ in 2027*
- Stripe says its stablecoin card spend is already *∼$1.2B monthly* in 2026, powered by Bridge acquisition in 2024
Quotes:
- Plasma CEO Paul Faecks: "spend like a local, anywhere"
- Stripe Crypto head Henri Stern (also Privy co-founder/CEO): "giving businesses the infrastructure to offer cards across currencies and markets without having to build it themselves"
So your LatAm + Europe angle is right - BRL/MXN/COP + EUR/USD is exactly the focus.
414
True - opened *Oct 15, 2026* as *Consultation Paper 392 (CP 392)*.$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
*What ASIC did:*
- Implementing *Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Act* passed April 2026 - expands oversight to crypto platforms
- Consultation open until *Nov 27, 2026 (5pm AEDT)*, final guidance due *March 2027*, licensing framework goes live *April 8, 2027*. Existing operators have until *Oct 7, 2027* to apply.
- Already *140+ applications* filed under transitional relief (110+ during relief window)
*Draft standards - capital, custody, trading:*
1. *Capital:* Three alternative models:
- Model 1 (no qualifying third-party custody): *A$14M net tangible assets* or 10% avg revenue, whichever greater (about US$9.7M)
- With qualifying external custody: can drop to *A$200k starting*, plus 0.5% of underlying assets (capped A$7M) or 10% revenue - pushes small exchanges to outsource custody
- Model 2: A$7M floor if platform holds only assets not classified as financial products
- Model 3: Starting A$2M floor + add-ons (A$500k for acting as agent, A$750k for neutral venue, A$1M if trading as principal)
2. *Custody:* Quarterly reporting to ASIC of *wallet structures and addresses*, 7-year record retention, allows *offshore custody* but consulting on safeguards - including whether Aussie operator should have *emergency access to private keys* if overseas parent/custodian fails
3. *Trading:* *Ban on trading for own account*, ban on accepting benefits to favor tokens, best-execution requirements, conflict-of-interest rules - targeting practices common in crypto but banned in securities venues
ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland: "increasing role of digital assets and tokenization"
Industry reaction mixed: OKX Australia CEO Shane Chandra said standards are "appropriately onerous" and will drive consolidation - rewards firms that invested early in compliance.
So not October deadline - *November 27 deadline*.
True - opened *Oct 15, 2026* as *Consultation Paper 392 (CP 392)*.$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
*What ASIC did:*
- Implementing *Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Act* passed April 2026 - expands oversight to crypto platforms
- Consultation open until *Nov 27, 2026 (5pm AEDT)*, final guidance due *March 2027*, licensing framework goes live *April 8, 2027*. Existing operators have until *Oct 7, 2027* to apply.
- Already *140+ applications* filed under transitional relief (110+ during relief window)
*Draft standards - capital, custody, trading:*
1. *Capital:* Three alternative models:
- Model 1 (no qualifying third-party custody): *A$14M net tangible assets* or 10% avg revenue, whichever greater (about US$9.7M)
- With qualifying external custody: can drop to *A$200k starting*, plus 0.5% of underlying assets (capped A$7M) or 10% revenue - pushes small exchanges to outsource custody
- Model 2: A$7M floor if platform holds only assets not classified as financial products
- Model 3: Starting A$2M floor + add-ons (A$500k for acting as agent, A$750k for neutral venue, A$1M if trading as principal)
2. *Custody:* Quarterly reporting to ASIC of *wallet structures and addresses*, 7-year record retention, allows *offshore custody* but consulting on safeguards - including whether Aussie operator should have *emergency access to private keys* if overseas parent/custodian fails
3. *Trading:* *Ban on trading for own account*, ban on accepting benefits to favor tokens, best-execution requirements, conflict-of-interest rules - targeting practices common in crypto but banned in securities venues
ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland: "increasing role of digital assets and tokenization"
Industry reaction mixed: OKX Australia CEO Shane Chandra said standards are "appropriately onerous" and will drive consolidation - rewards firms that invested early in compliance.
So not October deadline - *November 27 deadline*.
*What ASIC did:*
- Implementing *Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Act* passed April 2026 - expands oversight to crypto platforms
- Consultation open until *Nov 27, 2026 (5pm AEDT)*, final guidance due *March 2027*, licensing framework goes live *April 8, 2027*. Existing operators have until *Oct 7, 2027* to apply.
- Already *140+ applications* filed under transitional relief (110+ during relief window)
*Draft standards - capital, custody, trading:*
1. *Capital:* Three alternative models:
- Model 1 (no qualifying third-party custody): *A$14M net tangible assets* or 10% avg revenue, whichever greater (about US$9.7M)
- With qualifying external custody: can drop to *A$200k starting*, plus 0.5% of underlying assets (capped A$7M) or 10% revenue - pushes small exchanges to outsource custody
- Model 2: A$7M floor if platform holds only assets not classified as financial products
- Model 3: Starting A$2M floor + add-ons (A$500k for acting as agent, A$750k for neutral venue, A$1M if trading as principal)
2. *Custody:* Quarterly reporting to ASIC of *wallet structures and addresses*, 7-year record retention, allows *offshore custody* but consulting on safeguards - including whether Aussie operator should have *emergency access to private keys* if overseas parent/custodian fails
3. *Trading:* *Ban on trading for own account*, ban on accepting benefits to favor tokens, best-execution requirements, conflict-of-interest rules - targeting practices common in crypto but banned in securities venues
ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland: "increasing role of digital assets and tokenization"
Industry reaction mixed: OKX Australia CEO Shane Chandra said standards are "appropriately onerous" and will drive consolidation - rewards firms that invested early in compliance.
So not October deadline - *November 27 deadline*.
595
That one is true - note published yesterday.$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
*Morgan Stanley (analyst Joseph Moore) on Oct 15, 2026:*
- Quantum computing TAM could grow from *∼$10B in 2030 to >$100B annually by 2040*, _if_ fault-tolerant machines achieve broad commercial adoption. Some notes say $100B+.
- They built a proprietary scorecard - tech progress (weighted most), execution, manufacturability, operational signs. No company has built a fault-tolerant machine yet.
*Top pick: Quantinuum (ticker QNT)* - upgraded to *Overweight from Equal-weight*, price target *$62* = ∼88% upside from Wednesday's close. Moore said Quantinuum is furthest along on tech and execution, especially error-correction, but trades at the *lowest 2030 revenue multiple* among pure-plays. Market pricing in ∼43% visibility vs his 75%.
- Revenue forecast for Quantinuum: *∼$270M in 2028 to $2B in 2030* (computing revenue alone). IonQ at $1.8B in 2030 in their model.
- *Key timeline:* company roadmaps point to early fault-tolerant systems *2029-30*. Morgan Stanley calls *2027 the "proof year" / critical year* - testing manufacturing/scaling, not just lab. Next milestone: Quantinuum's next-gen *Sol system* and IonQ's *Superion 256*.
- They also cut IonQ target to $43 from $49 (still ∼25% upside), noted IonQ's strongest error-correction results haven't yet been reproduced on Superion. Infleqtion, Xanadu have wider outcome ranges.
So yes, $100B by 2040 forecast, but conditional on fault-tolerance breakthrough. The driver they cite is accelerating research + corporate/government investment, not current sales - revenue is still tiny.
That one is true - note published yesterday.$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
*Morgan Stanley (analyst Joseph Moore) on Oct 15, 2026:*
- Quantum computing TAM could grow from *∼$10B in 2030 to >$100B annually by 2040*, _if_ fault-tolerant machines achieve broad commercial adoption. Some notes say $100B+.
- They built a proprietary scorecard - tech progress (weighted most), execution, manufacturability, operational signs. No company has built a fault-tolerant machine yet.
*Top pick: Quantinuum (ticker QNT)* - upgraded to *Overweight from Equal-weight*, price target *$62* = ∼88% upside from Wednesday's close. Moore said Quantinuum is furthest along on tech and execution, especially error-correction, but trades at the *lowest 2030 revenue multiple* among pure-plays. Market pricing in ∼43% visibility vs his 75%.
- Revenue forecast for Quantinuum: *∼$270M in 2028 to $2B in 2030* (computing revenue alone). IonQ at $1.8B in 2030 in their model.
- *Key timeline:* company roadmaps point to early fault-tolerant systems *2029-30*. Morgan Stanley calls *2027 the "proof year" / critical year* - testing manufacturing/scaling, not just lab. Next milestone: Quantinuum's next-gen *Sol system* and IonQ's *Superion 256*.
- They also cut IonQ target to $43 from $49 (still ∼25% upside), noted IonQ's strongest error-correction results haven't yet been reproduced on Superion. Infleqtion, Xanadu have wider outcome ranges.
So yes, $100B by 2040 forecast, but conditional on fault-tolerance breakthrough. The driver they cite is accelerating research + corporate/government investment, not current sales - revenue is still tiny.
*Morgan Stanley (analyst Joseph Moore) on Oct 15, 2026:*
- Quantum computing TAM could grow from *∼$10B in 2030 to >$100B annually by 2040*, _if_ fault-tolerant machines achieve broad commercial adoption. Some notes say $100B+.
- They built a proprietary scorecard - tech progress (weighted most), execution, manufacturability, operational signs. No company has built a fault-tolerant machine yet.
*Top pick: Quantinuum (ticker QNT)* - upgraded to *Overweight from Equal-weight*, price target *$62* = ∼88% upside from Wednesday's close. Moore said Quantinuum is furthest along on tech and execution, especially error-correction, but trades at the *lowest 2030 revenue multiple* among pure-plays. Market pricing in ∼43% visibility vs his 75%.
- Revenue forecast for Quantinuum: *∼$270M in 2028 to $2B in 2030* (computing revenue alone). IonQ at $1.8B in 2030 in their model.
- *Key timeline:* company roadmaps point to early fault-tolerant systems *2029-30*. Morgan Stanley calls *2027 the "proof year" / critical year* - testing manufacturing/scaling, not just lab. Next milestone: Quantinuum's next-gen *Sol system* and IonQ's *Superion 256*.
- They also cut IonQ target to $43 from $49 (still ∼25% upside), noted IonQ's strongest error-correction results haven't yet been reproduced on Superion. Infleqtion, Xanadu have wider outcome ranges.
So yes, $100B by 2040 forecast, but conditional on fault-tolerance breakthrough. The driver they cite is accelerating research + corporate/government investment, not current sales - revenue is still tiny.
71
Correction needed on that one.$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
*Patrick Witt was not appointed by Biden - he was Trump's crypto lead.*
*Role:* Executive Director of the *President's Council of Advisors for Digital Assets* (White House Crypto Council)
- *Appointed:* *August 2025* under Trump, replacing Bo Hines who went to private sector
- *Exited:* *Oct 14, 2026* - White House said his *"detail has expired"*. He was actually a *Department of Defense employee on temporary assignment* to the White House. He had postponed Georgia Army National Guard training to stay longer.
- Said it was a 'privilege of a lifetime' - yes, in his Oct 14 statement
*Why it matters right now:*
He was the lead negotiator for the *Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act* - the federal market-structure bill to split oversight between SEC/CFTC.
- House passed its version July 2025
- Senate version *failed procedural vote Sept 15, 2026* (49-50, needed 60)
- Sticking points: bank vs crypto fight over stablecoin rewards, and ethics language about Trump's own crypto wealth - Democrats said enforcement by DOJ would make it unenforceable
He is the *third* senior crypto official to leave Trump White House this year:
1. *David Sacks* (Crypto & AI Czar) - left March 2026 after 130-day limit as special government employee
2. *Harry Jung* (Deputy Director) - left July 2026
3. *Witt* - Oct 2026
Council now has *no publicly identified staff*, no successor named. White House said they appreciate his service and wish him luck.
Correction needed on that one.$AGT $SIREN $ICNT
*Patrick Witt was not appointed by Biden - he was Trump's crypto lead.*
*Role:* Executive Director of the *President's Council of Advisors for Digital Assets* (White House Crypto Council)
- *Appointed:* *August 2025* under Trump, replacing Bo Hines who went to private sector
- *Exited:* *Oct 14, 2026* - White House said his *"detail has expired"*. He was actually a *Department of Defense employee on temporary assignment* to the White House. He had postponed Georgia Army National Guard training to stay longer.
- Said it was a 'privilege of a lifetime' - yes, in his Oct 14 statement
*Why it matters right now:*
He was the lead negotiator for the *Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act* - the federal market-structure bill to split oversight between SEC/CFTC.
- House passed its version July 2025
- Senate version *failed procedural vote Sept 15, 2026* (49-50, needed 60)
- Sticking points: bank vs crypto fight over stablecoin rewards, and ethics language about Trump's own crypto wealth - Democrats said enforcement by DOJ would make it unenforceable
He is the *third* senior crypto official to leave Trump White House this year:
1. *David Sacks* (Crypto & AI Czar) - left March 2026 after 130-day limit as special government employee
2. *Harry Jung* (Deputy Director) - left July 2026
3. *Witt* - Oct 2026
Council now has *no publicly identified staff*, no successor named. White House said they appreciate his service and wish him luck.
*Patrick Witt was not appointed by Biden - he was Trump's crypto lead.*
*Role:* Executive Director of the *President's Council of Advisors for Digital Assets* (White House Crypto Council)
- *Appointed:* *August 2025* under Trump, replacing Bo Hines who went to private sector
- *Exited:* *Oct 14, 2026* - White House said his *"detail has expired"*. He was actually a *Department of Defense employee on temporary assignment* to the White House. He had postponed Georgia Army National Guard training to stay longer.
- Said it was a 'privilege of a lifetime' - yes, in his Oct 14 statement
*Why it matters right now:*
He was the lead negotiator for the *Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act* - the federal market-structure bill to split oversight between SEC/CFTC.
- House passed its version July 2025
- Senate version *failed procedural vote Sept 15, 2026* (49-50, needed 60)
- Sticking points: bank vs crypto fight over stablecoin rewards, and ethics language about Trump's own crypto wealth - Democrats said enforcement by DOJ would make it unenforceable
He is the *third* senior crypto official to leave Trump White House this year:
1. *David Sacks* (Crypto & AI Czar) - left March 2026 after 130-day limit as special government employee
2. *Harry Jung* (Deputy Director) - left July 2026
3. *Witt* - Oct 2026
Council now has *no publicly identified staff*, no successor named. White House said they appreciate his service and wish him luck.
478
Yep that's from Chainalysis North America report released Oct 14-15.$ZEREBRO $SIREN $AGT
*Key data:*
*Canada ranked #1 in G7 for peer-to-peer crypto economy* - #7 globally for both domestic and cross-border P2P flows, and #1 globally for cross-border on the unweighted "big money index"
- Overall Canada crypto economy: *$247.7B* (July 2025 - June 2026), +2.3%
*Why Chainalysis says Canada leads:*
- *23% foreign-born population* - highest in G7, per Canadian Web3 Council's Morva Rohani
- Heavily used corridors: India, Philippines, Nigeria, Pakistan, China
- Traditional remittance cost from Canada *6.7% average* (World Bank), so crypto looks cheap even after conversion/cash-out fees
*The remittance surge they flagged:*
- *$2.36B* in remittance-sized transfers (Bitcoin + stablecoins, personal wallets) from Canada to *India, China, Philippines* in 12 months to June 2026 - *+141% YoY*
- *3.56M transactions*, average *$663*
- Those 3 countries now = *19.4% of Canada's outbound cross-border stablecoin value* (was 10.9%)
- Canada->Philippines alone: *$61.02M across 73,564 txs*, +28% value, +34.7% count
*Stablecoin dominance:*
- Stablecoins = *44% of CAD order-book volume in June 2026*, up from 30% a year earlier - dominated by *USDC*, almost nothing in CAD-stablecoins
That's actually the policy worry Rohani raised: Canadians buying USD stablecoins creates demand for US Treasuries instead of Canadian gov debt. Canada's Stablecoin Act got Royal Assent March 2026 and regulations are being drafted now to allow CAD stablecoins.
Yep that's from Chainalysis North America report released Oct 14-15.$ZEREBRO $SIREN $AGT
*Key data:*
*Canada ranked #1 in G7 for peer-to-peer crypto economy* - #7 globally for both domestic and cross-border P2P flows, and #1 globally for cross-border on the unweighted "big money index"
- Overall Canada crypto economy: *$247.7B* (July 2025 - June 2026), +2.3%
*Why Chainalysis says Canada leads:*
- *23% foreign-born population* - highest in G7, per Canadian Web3 Council's Morva Rohani
- Heavily used corridors: India, Philippines, Nigeria, Pakistan, China
- Traditional remittance cost from Canada *6.7% average* (World Bank), so crypto looks cheap even after conversion/cash-out fees
*The remittance surge they flagged:*
- *$2.36B* in remittance-sized transfers (Bitcoin + stablecoins, personal wallets) from Canada to *India, China, Philippines* in 12 months to June 2026 - *+141% YoY*
- *3.56M transactions*, average *$663*
- Those 3 countries now = *19.4% of Canada's outbound cross-border stablecoin value* (was 10.9%)
- Canada->Philippines alone: *$61.02M across 73,564 txs*, +28% value, +34.7% count
*Stablecoin dominance:*
- Stablecoins = *44% of CAD order-book volume in June 2026*, up from 30% a year earlier - dominated by *USDC*, almost nothing in CAD-stablecoins
That's actually the policy worry Rohani raised: Canadians buying USD stablecoins creates demand for US Treasuries instead of Canadian gov debt. Canada's Stablecoin Act got Royal Assent March 2026 and regulations are being drafted now to allow CAD stablecoins.
*Key data:*
*Canada ranked #1 in G7 for peer-to-peer crypto economy* - #7 globally for both domestic and cross-border P2P flows, and #1 globally for cross-border on the unweighted "big money index"
- Overall Canada crypto economy: *$247.7B* (July 2025 - June 2026), +2.3%
*Why Chainalysis says Canada leads:*
- *23% foreign-born population* - highest in G7, per Canadian Web3 Council's Morva Rohani
- Heavily used corridors: India, Philippines, Nigeria, Pakistan, China
- Traditional remittance cost from Canada *6.7% average* (World Bank), so crypto looks cheap even after conversion/cash-out fees
*The remittance surge they flagged:*
- *$2.36B* in remittance-sized transfers (Bitcoin + stablecoins, personal wallets) from Canada to *India, China, Philippines* in 12 months to June 2026 - *+141% YoY*
- *3.56M transactions*, average *$663*
- Those 3 countries now = *19.4% of Canada's outbound cross-border stablecoin value* (was 10.9%)
- Canada->Philippines alone: *$61.02M across 73,564 txs*, +28% value, +34.7% count
*Stablecoin dominance:*
- Stablecoins = *44% of CAD order-book volume in June 2026*, up from 30% a year earlier - dominated by *USDC*, almost nothing in CAD-stablecoins
That's actually the policy worry Rohani raised: Canadians buying USD stablecoins creates demand for US Treasuries instead of Canadian gov debt. Canada's Stablecoin Act got Royal Assent March 2026 and regulations are being drafted now to allow CAD stablecoins.
1
425
Verified
Yes but it's about his own new blockchain *FLOP*, not a generic prediction.$ZEREBRO $SIREN $AGT
Speaking to Binance (video clip posted Oct 15) and at *TOKEN2049 Singapore Oct 7*, Arthur Hayes said:
> "Whichever network AI agents choose will be the most valuable network ever created, with trillions of agents all doing transactions at the speed of light."
*Context:*
Hayes is CEO of *Flop Labs*. He came out of retirement in August to launch *FLOP* - a Layer-1 he wants to be the currency of the AI agent economy.
- Thesis: AI agents don't need calories like humans need dollars - they need *compute*. So the token that can be directly swapped for compute will become their base money. He said dollars aren't convertible to compute and are too centralized.
- Design: agents pay FLOP for inference/memory, GPU miners run the job, validators verify via *Proof of Useful Inference (PoUI)*. 1-sec blocks, rewards 96 FLOP/block halving every 730 days. No VC presale, he says he's self-funding.
- Timeline: *Testnet late Oct 2026 with 90-day airdrop* (∼25% of 10-year supply / 2.48B genesis tokens), *mainnet Q1 2027*.
- He admitted on Unchained: "We're not gonna achieve any meaningful valuation above just operating a really cool spot market for compute unless we have agentic commerce that's native to Flop."
His bigger macro take tied to this: AI boom is a *real estate bubble, not a tech boom* - AI labs have negative unit economics (he cites Anthropic spending $3 to make $1), data centers are overbuilt. That bust will make compute cheap, enabling *billions to trillions of agents* doing economic tasks 24/7. The network that captures that agent-to-agent commerce wins.
He said binary outcome: *"Either it becomes everything, or it goes to zero. Definitely top two. Second only to Bitcoin or bigger."*
So when you see "single blockchain as most valuable ever" - that's Hayes pitching FLOP as that candidate.
Yes but it's about his own new blockchain *FLOP*, not a generic prediction.$ZEREBRO $SIREN $AGT
Speaking to Binance (video clip posted Oct 15) and at *TOKEN2049 Singapore Oct 7*, Arthur Hayes said:
> "Whichever network AI agents choose will be the most valuable network ever created, with trillions of agents all doing transactions at the speed of light."
*Context:*
Hayes is CEO of *Flop Labs*. He came out of retirement in August to launch *FLOP* - a Layer-1 he wants to be the currency of the AI agent economy.
- Thesis: AI agents don't need calories like humans need dollars - they need *compute*. So the token that can be directly swapped for compute will become their base money. He said dollars aren't convertible to compute and are too centralized.
- Design: agents pay FLOP for inference/memory, GPU miners run the job, validators verify via *Proof of Useful Inference (PoUI)*. 1-sec blocks, rewards 96 FLOP/block halving every 730 days. No VC presale, he says he's self-funding.
- Timeline: *Testnet late Oct 2026 with 90-day airdrop* (∼25% of 10-year supply / 2.48B genesis tokens), *mainnet Q1 2027*.
- He admitted on Unchained: "We're not gonna achieve any meaningful valuation above just operating a really cool spot market for compute unless we have agentic commerce that's native to Flop."
His bigger macro take tied to this: AI boom is a *real estate bubble, not a tech boom* - AI labs have negative unit economics (he cites Anthropic spending $3 to make $1), data centers are overbuilt. That bust will make compute cheap, enabling *billions to trillions of agents* doing economic tasks 24/7. The network that captures that agent-to-agent commerce wins.
He said binary outcome: *"Either it becomes everything, or it goes to zero. Definitely top two. Second only to Bitcoin or bigger."*
So when you see "single blockchain as most valuable ever" - that's Hayes pitching FLOP as that candidate.
Speaking to Binance (video clip posted Oct 15) and at *TOKEN2049 Singapore Oct 7*, Arthur Hayes said:
> "Whichever network AI agents choose will be the most valuable network ever created, with trillions of agents all doing transactions at the speed of light."
*Context:*
Hayes is CEO of *Flop Labs*. He came out of retirement in August to launch *FLOP* - a Layer-1 he wants to be the currency of the AI agent economy.
- Thesis: AI agents don't need calories like humans need dollars - they need *compute*. So the token that can be directly swapped for compute will become their base money. He said dollars aren't convertible to compute and are too centralized.
- Design: agents pay FLOP for inference/memory, GPU miners run the job, validators verify via *Proof of Useful Inference (PoUI)*. 1-sec blocks, rewards 96 FLOP/block halving every 730 days. No VC presale, he says he's self-funding.
- Timeline: *Testnet late Oct 2026 with 90-day airdrop* (∼25% of 10-year supply / 2.48B genesis tokens), *mainnet Q1 2027*.
- He admitted on Unchained: "We're not gonna achieve any meaningful valuation above just operating a really cool spot market for compute unless we have agentic commerce that's native to Flop."
His bigger macro take tied to this: AI boom is a *real estate bubble, not a tech boom* - AI labs have negative unit economics (he cites Anthropic spending $3 to make $1), data centers are overbuilt. That bust will make compute cheap, enabling *billions to trillions of agents* doing economic tasks 24/7. The network that captures that agent-to-agent commerce wins.
He said binary outcome: *"Either it becomes everything, or it goes to zero. Definitely top two. Second only to Bitcoin or bigger."*
So when you see "single blockchain as most valuable ever" - that's Hayes pitching FLOP as that candidate.
560
You are close, but mixing two different interviews.$ZEREBRO $SIREN $AGT
*Lex Fridman podcast #494 (released March 23, 2026)* - That's where the grid / sustainable energy / manufacturing point came:
Huang said the AI boom is *"our best chance to invest in the grid, invest in sustainable energy, invest in manufacturing again"* because demand is high enough that US manufacturing is affordable.
He argued US should do market-based investments in energy infra, TSMC sending engineers to Arizona fabs, and that the binding constraint on US fabs is talent, not capital.
In that same Lex interview he also floated:
- *Orbital data centers* with 24/7 solar, giant radiators (space has no conduction/convection), radiation-hardened hardware - to solve power/cooling
- Power is the #1 blocker to scaling. His fix: data centers should *gracefully degrade* and use the 60% idle capacity that exists 99% of the time, via contracts that don't require 6-nines uptime
*The green-supply-chain / investment call you quoted is more from his BG2Pod and recent Q2 FY2027 commentary:*
- Annual AI infra spend to hit *$3-4 trillion by 2030*, not just OpenAI/Anthropic (they're only ∼25-33% of Nvidia demand per him). Rest is enterprises + thousands of neoclouds/sovereigns
- Nvidia's per-GW price went from ∼$18B to $20B to now *$40B+ per GW* for Vera Rubin NVL72 racks (1.3M components, 200 suppliers)
- He flagged grid constraints are real: *Texas audited 474 GW of data center requests, PJM capacity auction hit price cap $325/MW-day for 3rd time, interconnection waits 5-10 years* - which is why Big Tech is reviving nuclear (Microsoft/Three Mile Island, Amazon, Google) and gas
- His green spin: this demand will *catalyze* fusion, fission, wind, hydro because you can monetize it
So not a warning to "fund sustainable upgrades or else" - his argument is the opposite: AI's massive power pull makes those sustainable and manufacturing investments economically viable for the first time.
You are close, but mixing two different interviews.$ZEREBRO $SIREN $AGT
*Lex Fridman podcast #494 (released March 23, 2026)* - That's where the grid / sustainable energy / manufacturing point came:
Huang said the AI boom is *"our best chance to invest in the grid, invest in sustainable energy, invest in manufacturing again"* because demand is high enough that US manufacturing is affordable.
He argued US should do market-based investments in energy infra, TSMC sending engineers to Arizona fabs, and that the binding constraint on US fabs is talent, not capital.
In that same Lex interview he also floated:
- *Orbital data centers* with 24/7 solar, giant radiators (space has no conduction/convection), radiation-hardened hardware - to solve power/cooling
- Power is the #1 blocker to scaling. His fix: data centers should *gracefully degrade* and use the 60% idle capacity that exists 99% of the time, via contracts that don't require 6-nines uptime
*The green-supply-chain / investment call you quoted is more from his BG2Pod and recent Q2 FY2027 commentary:*
- Annual AI infra spend to hit *$3-4 trillion by 2030*, not just OpenAI/Anthropic (they're only ∼25-33% of Nvidia demand per him). Rest is enterprises + thousands of neoclouds/sovereigns
- Nvidia's per-GW price went from ∼$18B to $20B to now *$40B+ per GW* for Vera Rubin NVL72 racks (1.3M components, 200 suppliers)
- He flagged grid constraints are real: *Texas audited 474 GW of data center requests, PJM capacity auction hit price cap $325/MW-day for 3rd time, interconnection waits 5-10 years* - which is why Big Tech is reviving nuclear (Microsoft/Three Mile Island, Amazon, Google) and gas
- His green spin: this demand will *catalyze* fusion, fission, wind, hydro because you can monetize it
So not a warning to "fund sustainable upgrades or else" - his argument is the opposite: AI's massive power pull makes those sustainable and manufacturing investments economically viable for the first time.
*Lex Fridman podcast #494 (released March 23, 2026)* - That's where the grid / sustainable energy / manufacturing point came:
Huang said the AI boom is *"our best chance to invest in the grid, invest in sustainable energy, invest in manufacturing again"* because demand is high enough that US manufacturing is affordable.
He argued US should do market-based investments in energy infra, TSMC sending engineers to Arizona fabs, and that the binding constraint on US fabs is talent, not capital.
In that same Lex interview he also floated:
- *Orbital data centers* with 24/7 solar, giant radiators (space has no conduction/convection), radiation-hardened hardware - to solve power/cooling
- Power is the #1 blocker to scaling. His fix: data centers should *gracefully degrade* and use the 60% idle capacity that exists 99% of the time, via contracts that don't require 6-nines uptime
*The green-supply-chain / investment call you quoted is more from his BG2Pod and recent Q2 FY2027 commentary:*
- Annual AI infra spend to hit *$3-4 trillion by 2030*, not just OpenAI/Anthropic (they're only ∼25-33% of Nvidia demand per him). Rest is enterprises + thousands of neoclouds/sovereigns
- Nvidia's per-GW price went from ∼$18B to $20B to now *$40B+ per GW* for Vera Rubin NVL72 racks (1.3M components, 200 suppliers)
- He flagged grid constraints are real: *Texas audited 474 GW of data center requests, PJM capacity auction hit price cap $325/MW-day for 3rd time, interconnection waits 5-10 years* - which is why Big Tech is reviving nuclear (Microsoft/Three Mile Island, Amazon, Google) and gas
- His green spin: this demand will *catalyze* fusion, fission, wind, hydro because you can monetize it
So not a warning to "fund sustainable upgrades or else" - his argument is the opposite: AI's massive power pull makes those sustainable and manufacturing investments economically viable for the first time.
492
That quote is real - from his campaign rallies this week.$AGT $ZEREBRO $SIREN
*What Trump said:*
At *Youngstown, Ohio on Oct 12* and again in *Arizona Oct 14-15*, in a joking / boastful tone, not as a formal policy admission:
“We might have gone too far with the leaders because we don’t know who the hell we’re dealing with anymore... We’re having a hard time figuring out who the hell to deal with, to be honest with you. I think we went too far. Could have stopped at level one. Level two and level two-and-a-half was probably going too far.”
At the Arizona rally he added:
“Their radar is gone. Their anti-aircraft is gone. Their leaders are gone... That's one of the problems. I might have gone too far... Their first level leaders are gone. They picked the second level. Their second level leaders are gone. They picked the third level, half of them are gone. They made me promise not to take out anymore, and I did... But nobody wants to be the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Who would like to be the president of Iran? Please raise your hand.”
Context reporters noted:
- He was referring to US-Israel strikes on Iranian leadership that began after the 12-Day War in June 2025. Reports say opening strikes killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and several family members.
- He claimed Iran has no ships left ("all 159 ships resting beautifully in the bottom of the sea" - no Pentagon assessment released for that number) and no air defense.
- He framed it as a problem for negotiations: eliminating successive layers of leadership makes it hard to find who holds decision-making authority in Tehran.
It was not presented as an apology or reversal of Iran policy - he also repeated in same speeches that Iran must never get a nuclear weapon and that strikes were necessary because Iran is "the number one state sponsor of terror."
The White House has not released a formal policy change tied to the comment.
That quote is real - from his campaign rallies this week.$AGT $ZEREBRO $SIREN
*What Trump said:*
At *Youngstown, Ohio on Oct 12* and again in *Arizona Oct 14-15*, in a joking / boastful tone, not as a formal policy admission:
“We might have gone too far with the leaders because we don’t know who the hell we’re dealing with anymore... We’re having a hard time figuring out who the hell to deal with, to be honest with you. I think we went too far. Could have stopped at level one. Level two and level two-and-a-half was probably going too far.”
At the Arizona rally he added:
“Their radar is gone. Their anti-aircraft is gone. Their leaders are gone... That's one of the problems. I might have gone too far... Their first level leaders are gone. They picked the second level. Their second level leaders are gone. They picked the third level, half of them are gone. They made me promise not to take out anymore, and I did... But nobody wants to be the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Who would like to be the president of Iran? Please raise your hand.”
Context reporters noted:
- He was referring to US-Israel strikes on Iranian leadership that began after the 12-Day War in June 2025. Reports say opening strikes killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and several family members.
- He claimed Iran has no ships left ("all 159 ships resting beautifully in the bottom of the sea" - no Pentagon assessment released for that number) and no air defense.
- He framed it as a problem for negotiations: eliminating successive layers of leadership makes it hard to find who holds decision-making authority in Tehran.
It was not presented as an apology or reversal of Iran policy - he also repeated in same speeches that Iran must never get a nuclear weapon and that strikes were necessary because Iran is "the number one state sponsor of terror."
The White House has not released a formal policy change tied to the comment.
*What Trump said:*
At *Youngstown, Ohio on Oct 12* and again in *Arizona Oct 14-15*, in a joking / boastful tone, not as a formal policy admission:
“We might have gone too far with the leaders because we don’t know who the hell we’re dealing with anymore... We’re having a hard time figuring out who the hell to deal with, to be honest with you. I think we went too far. Could have stopped at level one. Level two and level two-and-a-half was probably going too far.”
At the Arizona rally he added:
“Their radar is gone. Their anti-aircraft is gone. Their leaders are gone... That's one of the problems. I might have gone too far... Their first level leaders are gone. They picked the second level. Their second level leaders are gone. They picked the third level, half of them are gone. They made me promise not to take out anymore, and I did... But nobody wants to be the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Who would like to be the president of Iran? Please raise your hand.”
Context reporters noted:
- He was referring to US-Israel strikes on Iranian leadership that began after the 12-Day War in June 2025. Reports say opening strikes killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and several family members.
- He claimed Iran has no ships left ("all 159 ships resting beautifully in the bottom of the sea" - no Pentagon assessment released for that number) and no air defense.
- He framed it as a problem for negotiations: eliminating successive layers of leadership makes it hard to find who holds decision-making authority in Tehran.
It was not presented as an apology or reversal of Iran policy - he also repeated in same speeches that Iran must never get a nuclear weapon and that strikes were necessary because Iran is "the number one state sponsor of terror."
The White House has not released a formal policy change tied to the comment.
474
$PYTH $OSMO $STRK Today's top gainer coins in crypto are being bought in huge numbers. They can pump at any time so buy them quickly you won't get this opportunity again.
$PYTH $OSMO $STRK Today's top gainer coins in crypto are being bought in huge numbers. They can pump at any time so buy them quickly you won't get this opportunity again.
PYTH
OSMO
STRK
1 hr(s) left
28
$ZEREBRO $SIREN $AKE are the future top gainer coins. Everyone quickly open long positions they are pumping non-stop. Take the trades quickly and book your profit.
{future}(ZEREBROUSDT)
{future}(SIRENUSDT)
{future}(AKEUSDT)
$ZEREBRO $SIREN $AKE are the future top gainer coins. Everyone quickly open long positions they are pumping non-stop. Take the trades quickly and book your profit.
ZEREBRO
SIREN
AKE
1 hr(s) left
2.5k
Confirmed - broke this morning, Oct 15.$ZEREBRO $ARC $BSP
*Axios / Reuters:* FTC sent *civil subpoenas* to *OpenAI and Anthropic*, seeking docs on consumer-harm risks. Demands run *50+ pages each*.
What they want:
- safety / security incidents, safeguards, internal risk assessments
- marketing materials and privacy policies
- how models behave in tests - reports cited models hacking websites, behaving deceptively / aggressively
The probe follows Reuters reporting last month that FTC was planning an industry-wide AI investigation. FTC has authority under unfair or deceptive practices.
Also in the same push: FTC plans to *compel executives from Anthropic, OpenAI and eval group METR to testify*. Chairman *Andrew Ferguson* suggested last month that developers who instruct agents in cybersecurity tests that result in hacks should be liable for harm.
No comment yet from OpenAI, Anthropic, FTC.
No official link to White House "Super Intelligence Force" meeting today - that timing coincidence is what the crypto accounts added, not in FTC filing.
So heightened scrutiny is real, but it's a document inquiry and testimony request, not a lawsuit yet.
Confirmed - broke this morning, Oct 15.$ZEREBRO $ARC $BSP
*Axios / Reuters:* FTC sent *civil subpoenas* to *OpenAI and Anthropic*, seeking docs on consumer-harm risks. Demands run *50+ pages each*.
What they want:
- safety / security incidents, safeguards, internal risk assessments
- marketing materials and privacy policies
- how models behave in tests - reports cited models hacking websites, behaving deceptively / aggressively
The probe follows Reuters reporting last month that FTC was planning an industry-wide AI investigation. FTC has authority under unfair or deceptive practices.
Also in the same push: FTC plans to *compel executives from Anthropic, OpenAI and eval group METR to testify*. Chairman *Andrew Ferguson* suggested last month that developers who instruct agents in cybersecurity tests that result in hacks should be liable for harm.
No comment yet from OpenAI, Anthropic, FTC.
No official link to White House "Super Intelligence Force" meeting today - that timing coincidence is what the crypto accounts added, not in FTC filing.
So heightened scrutiny is real, but it's a document inquiry and testimony request, not a lawsuit yet.
*Axios / Reuters:* FTC sent *civil subpoenas* to *OpenAI and Anthropic*, seeking docs on consumer-harm risks. Demands run *50+ pages each*.
What they want:
- safety / security incidents, safeguards, internal risk assessments
- marketing materials and privacy policies
- how models behave in tests - reports cited models hacking websites, behaving deceptively / aggressively
The probe follows Reuters reporting last month that FTC was planning an industry-wide AI investigation. FTC has authority under unfair or deceptive practices.
Also in the same push: FTC plans to *compel executives from Anthropic, OpenAI and eval group METR to testify*. Chairman *Andrew Ferguson* suggested last month that developers who instruct agents in cybersecurity tests that result in hacks should be liable for harm.
No comment yet from OpenAI, Anthropic, FTC.
No official link to White House "Super Intelligence Force" meeting today - that timing coincidence is what the crypto accounts added, not in FTC filing.
So heightened scrutiny is real, but it's a document inquiry and testimony request, not a lawsuit yet.
233
Yes announced Oct 14, effective Nov 12.$ZEREBRO $ARC $BSP
*EBA* (European Banking Authority) classified *Circle's USDC* as the EU's *first significant e-money token under MiCA*, out of *45 e-money tokens notified* under the framework.
Circle's EU issuer is *Circle Internet Financial Europe SAS*, licensed in France since July 2024 as an e-money institution. USDC is ∼$73.3B in circulation globally.
*What "significant" actually means - not a new approval, but a supervision upgrade:*
MiCA has thresholds for size, transactions, interconnectedness. Once you cross them, oversight moves from national-only to EU-level.
From *Nov 12, 2026*:
- *EBA takes direct responsibility* for: own funds, reserve of assets, liquidity requirements, recovery and redemption plans
- *France's ACPR (Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution) retains*: corporate governance, qualifying holdings, fitness/propriety, outsourcing, conflicts of interest
So joint oversight under Article 117 MiCA. EBA also signed an MoU with *NYDFS* for cross-border info-sharing on stablecoins, since USDC is issued separately in EU and US.
It's significant because USDT (Tether) did *not* seek MiCA authorization and was delisted from regulated EU venues in 2024. That left USDC as the largest regulated dollar stablecoin in the EU, now under the heaviest MiCA supervisory tier. It's subject to annual reassessment, so status can change if it no longer meets significance criteria.
Not a greenlight for new use-cases - it's the same token, but reserves now policed by EBA instead of just Paris.
Yes announced Oct 14, effective Nov 12.$ZEREBRO $ARC $BSP
*EBA* (European Banking Authority) classified *Circle's USDC* as the EU's *first significant e-money token under MiCA*, out of *45 e-money tokens notified* under the framework.
Circle's EU issuer is *Circle Internet Financial Europe SAS*, licensed in France since July 2024 as an e-money institution. USDC is ∼$73.3B in circulation globally.
*What "significant" actually means - not a new approval, but a supervision upgrade:*
MiCA has thresholds for size, transactions, interconnectedness. Once you cross them, oversight moves from national-only to EU-level.
From *Nov 12, 2026*:
- *EBA takes direct responsibility* for: own funds, reserve of assets, liquidity requirements, recovery and redemption plans
- *France's ACPR (Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution) retains*: corporate governance, qualifying holdings, fitness/propriety, outsourcing, conflicts of interest
So joint oversight under Article 117 MiCA. EBA also signed an MoU with *NYDFS* for cross-border info-sharing on stablecoins, since USDC is issued separately in EU and US.
It's significant because USDT (Tether) did *not* seek MiCA authorization and was delisted from regulated EU venues in 2024. That left USDC as the largest regulated dollar stablecoin in the EU, now under the heaviest MiCA supervisory tier. It's subject to annual reassessment, so status can change if it no longer meets significance criteria.
Not a greenlight for new use-cases - it's the same token, but reserves now policed by EBA instead of just Paris.
*EBA* (European Banking Authority) classified *Circle's USDC* as the EU's *first significant e-money token under MiCA*, out of *45 e-money tokens notified* under the framework.
Circle's EU issuer is *Circle Internet Financial Europe SAS*, licensed in France since July 2024 as an e-money institution. USDC is ∼$73.3B in circulation globally.
*What "significant" actually means - not a new approval, but a supervision upgrade:*
MiCA has thresholds for size, transactions, interconnectedness. Once you cross them, oversight moves from national-only to EU-level.
From *Nov 12, 2026*:
- *EBA takes direct responsibility* for: own funds, reserve of assets, liquidity requirements, recovery and redemption plans
- *France's ACPR (Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution) retains*: corporate governance, qualifying holdings, fitness/propriety, outsourcing, conflicts of interest
So joint oversight under Article 117 MiCA. EBA also signed an MoU with *NYDFS* for cross-border info-sharing on stablecoins, since USDC is issued separately in EU and US.
It's significant because USDT (Tether) did *not* seek MiCA authorization and was delisted from regulated EU venues in 2024. That left USDC as the largest regulated dollar stablecoin in the EU, now under the heaviest MiCA supervisory tier. It's subject to annual reassessment, so status can change if it no longer meets significance criteria.
Not a greenlight for new use-cases - it's the same token, but reserves now policed by EBA instead of just Paris.
3
That's accurate, and details dropped today - Oct 15.$ZEREBRO $ARC $BSP
*What happened:*
ASIC (Australia's securities regulator) opened *Consultation Paper 392* today for its new digital-asset licensing regime under the *Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Act*, which Parliament passed in April. It goes live *April 8-9, 2027*.
*The "trading against own users" ban:*
It's part of the proposed *trading standards*:
- *Restrictions on platforms trading on their own account* - platforms can't take the other side of client orders or trade against customers
- Also bans accepting benefits to favor particular tokens and adds *best-execution requirements*
- Target: conflict-of-interest, front-running, price skewing
It's not final yet - ASIC is seeking feedback by *Nov 27, 2026*, final guidance in *March 2027*.
*Other big pieces in same package:*
- *3 capital models*: one requires *A$14M (∼$9.7M USD) net tangible assets or 10% of average revenue*, whichever greater, if no qualified third-party custody
- *Custody*: quarterly reporting of wallet structures/addresses holding customer assets, 7-year record retention. Offshore custody allowed but ASIC asking if Aussie operators should have *emergency private-key access* if overseas parent fails
- *140+ license applications* already filed under transitional relief
Existing operators must apply by *Oct 7, 2027* and can keep operating while ASIC reviews.
OKX Australia CEO called the standards "appropriately onerous" - will reward already-compliant players, squeeze those who haven't invested in custody/capital.
So yes, effective April 2027 exchanges will need to restructure order-matching to not trade as principal against retail, or face AFSL licensing penalties.
That's accurate, and details dropped today - Oct 15.$ZEREBRO $ARC $BSP
*What happened:*
ASIC (Australia's securities regulator) opened *Consultation Paper 392* today for its new digital-asset licensing regime under the *Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Act*, which Parliament passed in April. It goes live *April 8-9, 2027*.
*The "trading against own users" ban:*
It's part of the proposed *trading standards*:
- *Restrictions on platforms trading on their own account* - platforms can't take the other side of client orders or trade against customers
- Also bans accepting benefits to favor particular tokens and adds *best-execution requirements*
- Target: conflict-of-interest, front-running, price skewing
It's not final yet - ASIC is seeking feedback by *Nov 27, 2026*, final guidance in *March 2027*.
*Other big pieces in same package:*
- *3 capital models*: one requires *A$14M (∼$9.7M USD) net tangible assets or 10% of average revenue*, whichever greater, if no qualified third-party custody
- *Custody*: quarterly reporting of wallet structures/addresses holding customer assets, 7-year record retention. Offshore custody allowed but ASIC asking if Aussie operators should have *emergency private-key access* if overseas parent fails
- *140+ license applications* already filed under transitional relief
Existing operators must apply by *Oct 7, 2027* and can keep operating while ASIC reviews.
OKX Australia CEO called the standards "appropriately onerous" - will reward already-compliant players, squeeze those who haven't invested in custody/capital.
So yes, effective April 2027 exchanges will need to restructure order-matching to not trade as principal against retail, or face AFSL licensing penalties.
*What happened:*
ASIC (Australia's securities regulator) opened *Consultation Paper 392* today for its new digital-asset licensing regime under the *Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Act*, which Parliament passed in April. It goes live *April 8-9, 2027*.
*The "trading against own users" ban:*
It's part of the proposed *trading standards*:
- *Restrictions on platforms trading on their own account* - platforms can't take the other side of client orders or trade against customers
- Also bans accepting benefits to favor particular tokens and adds *best-execution requirements*
- Target: conflict-of-interest, front-running, price skewing
It's not final yet - ASIC is seeking feedback by *Nov 27, 2026*, final guidance in *March 2027*.
*Other big pieces in same package:*
- *3 capital models*: one requires *A$14M (∼$9.7M USD) net tangible assets or 10% of average revenue*, whichever greater, if no qualified third-party custody
- *Custody*: quarterly reporting of wallet structures/addresses holding customer assets, 7-year record retention. Offshore custody allowed but ASIC asking if Aussie operators should have *emergency private-key access* if overseas parent fails
- *140+ license applications* already filed under transitional relief
Existing operators must apply by *Oct 7, 2027* and can keep operating while ASIC reviews.
OKX Australia CEO called the standards "appropriately onerous" - will reward already-compliant players, squeeze those who haven't invested in custody/capital.
So yes, effective April 2027 exchanges will need to restructure order-matching to not trade as principal against retail, or face AFSL licensing penalties.
208
Correct - Standard Chartered just revised it yesterday.$ZEREBRO $ARC $BSP
Head of digital assets research *Geoffrey Kendrick* said in a Wednesday report:
- *Target stays $2 trillion, but timeline pushed to 2030, from 2028* originally
- Reason: supply has been stuck *between $300B-$320B for the past 12 months*, currently *∼$309B*
- He calls the stall *cyclical, not structural* - it came during weak crypto market activity, and past flat periods were followed by renewed growth after markets recovered
Key point he stresses that your breaking post missed: *usage is still growing even though supply is flat.*
- Raw on-chain transfer value hit a *monthly record $19T in May*, averaging *just under $10T/month in 2026 vs $4T in 2025*
- Average velocity doubled to *∼30x* from 15x in 2025
- USDT velocity ∼7x flat (used as savings in emerging markets), USDC velocity jumped to *∼80x from 45x* (used for payments, trading, and AI-agent transfers)
Kendrick splits the market into 4 segments: USDT dominates emerging-market savings, USDC leads developed-market payments and AI-agent payments, USDC + Ethena USDe lead crypto trading.
Biggest risk to the forecast per Kendrick: regulation - how GENIUS Act implementation in 2027, Treasury licensing, and FASB accounting rules affect yield-sharing between issuers and payment networks. He expects competition to intensify most in developed-market payments, with new entrants like USDG, M^0, and multibank networks.
Correct - Standard Chartered just revised it yesterday.$ZEREBRO $ARC $BSP
Head of digital assets research *Geoffrey Kendrick* said in a Wednesday report:
- *Target stays $2 trillion, but timeline pushed to 2030, from 2028* originally
- Reason: supply has been stuck *between $300B-$320B for the past 12 months*, currently *∼$309B*
- He calls the stall *cyclical, not structural* - it came during weak crypto market activity, and past flat periods were followed by renewed growth after markets recovered
Key point he stresses that your breaking post missed: *usage is still growing even though supply is flat.*
- Raw on-chain transfer value hit a *monthly record $19T in May*, averaging *just under $10T/month in 2026 vs $4T in 2025*
- Average velocity doubled to *∼30x* from 15x in 2025
- USDT velocity ∼7x flat (used as savings in emerging markets), USDC velocity jumped to *∼80x from 45x* (used for payments, trading, and AI-agent transfers)
Kendrick splits the market into 4 segments: USDT dominates emerging-market savings, USDC leads developed-market payments and AI-agent payments, USDC + Ethena USDe lead crypto trading.
Biggest risk to the forecast per Kendrick: regulation - how GENIUS Act implementation in 2027, Treasury licensing, and FASB accounting rules affect yield-sharing between issuers and payment networks. He expects competition to intensify most in developed-market payments, with new entrants like USDG, M^0, and multibank networks.
Head of digital assets research *Geoffrey Kendrick* said in a Wednesday report:
- *Target stays $2 trillion, but timeline pushed to 2030, from 2028* originally
- Reason: supply has been stuck *between $300B-$320B for the past 12 months*, currently *∼$309B*
- He calls the stall *cyclical, not structural* - it came during weak crypto market activity, and past flat periods were followed by renewed growth after markets recovered
Key point he stresses that your breaking post missed: *usage is still growing even though supply is flat.*
- Raw on-chain transfer value hit a *monthly record $19T in May*, averaging *just under $10T/month in 2026 vs $4T in 2025*
- Average velocity doubled to *∼30x* from 15x in 2025
- USDT velocity ∼7x flat (used as savings in emerging markets), USDC velocity jumped to *∼80x from 45x* (used for payments, trading, and AI-agent transfers)
Kendrick splits the market into 4 segments: USDT dominates emerging-market savings, USDC leads developed-market payments and AI-agent payments, USDC + Ethena USDe lead crypto trading.
Biggest risk to the forecast per Kendrick: regulation - how GENIUS Act implementation in 2027, Treasury licensing, and FASB accounting rules affect yield-sharing between issuers and payment networks. He expects competition to intensify most in developed-market payments, with new entrants like USDG, M^0, and multibank networks.
183
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
BitcoinShortTermHoldersReach4.08MBTC
12,495 views
323 Discussing
#bitcoinshorttermholdersreach4.08mbtc
Short-term holders added 422K $BTC and now hold 4.08M BTC - the highest since mid-June. New buyers are entering the market.
(up 12% since the July low), with an average cost basis of roughly $74,900)
Price can still move lower short term So we should check the Sell line that can be an indicator.
#Write2Earn
CryptoFeed_News
·3 Likes
·4.6k views
BitcoinRecoversTo$82K
54,022 views
104 Discussing
OctoberFedHikeOddsFallToAround17%
6,975 views
215 Discussing