Study the futures market. Test your knowledge with Trading Test first. But test many times. And only if you have sufficient funds that won't cause hardship, start trading with real money. Those who ignore this miss out on savings for a lifetime in the futures market.
Time to be serious: today the market got spooked and a lot of you probably felt it in your wallet. 😬 BTC fell almost 3% and went back to around 62k after opening the day near 63,700. The trigger? Trump backed away from the ceasefire with Iran and tensions in the Middle East flared up again. Result: oil prices rising, the Kospi (South Korea’s stock exchange) collapsing by almost 9% during the early hours, and more than $253 million in leveraged positions liquidated over the last 24 hours.
But pay attention to this detail that not many people are talking about: even with this widespread risk-off move, spot Bitcoin ETFs are still showing institutional money inflows. In other words, while the traditional market is panicking over the war, people buying BTC via ETF are not running away. This is a sign of strong hands holding, not capitulation.
On the chart, this is how I read it right now: as long as price stays between 61,200 and 64,000, it’s just short-term noise inside a range of indecision. If it breaks above 63,700 with strength, the outlook improves quickly. If it falls below 61,200, 60k comes back into focus and things get tense again.
My personal take: a war day is usually a day of emotional reaction, not a clearly defined trend. For long-term holders, this is noise. For those leveraged in the short term, be extra careful with the news coming out at any time.
And you—are you seeing this drop as an opportunity or waiting for the dust to settle before moving a finger? Comment below 👇
$BTC Tip: clicking the coin tag or the chart will take you straight to the trading screen— a practical shortcut if you were going to trade anyway. And on top of that, it helps keep this content active here. 🙌
NEWT under pressure: the unlock calendar that could define the next few months
After closely watching NEWT’s behavior over the last few weeks, I decided to stop and organize something I consider essential for anyone who has—or is thinking of having—exposure to the token: the release (unlocks) calendar that lies ahead. This isn’t just "more technical data"—it’s possibly the main factor of price pressure over the next few months, and I want to make that clear to anyone following me. What has happened so far O NEWT has gone through a heavy unlock on June 24: about 139.45 million tokens released at once, equivalent to practically 14% of the total supply and more than 60% of the market cap at the time. It was one of the biggest proportional unlocks of the month among the major projects being monitored. The outcome was no surprise for anyone who understands tokenomics: selling pressure, high volatility, and the price testing historical lows.
🔓 @NewtonProtocol (NEWT) has another unlock coming on July 24 — and the market still hasn’t priced it in properly
Running the data for $NEWT today, I noticed something that not many people are talking about: on July 24, there will be another token release, about 17.37M NEWT (~1.74% of the total supply). Then it repeats every following month (August, September...) on the same schedule. This comes after the massive unlock on June 24, which already released almost 140M tokens in one go. To put it in context: the NEWT price is trading near $0.049, close to the historical low set a few days ago, and the token is down more than 94% from its peak. 24h volume is around $5–6M, which for a project of this size is reasonably liquid, but nothing extraordinary. 📖 My take: recurring unlocks of this size, month after month, tend to prevent any recovery attempts — because there’s always new supply hitting the market before demand can really take hold. On the other hand, the project keeps delivering: the “compliance-as-code” thesis (using the protocol to automate the approval/blocking of on-chain transactions via verifiable policies) is still the long-term differentiator, and that doesn’t change with short-term price. 💭 In my opinion, short term is tough — the monthly unlocks will keep adding pressure until a strong demand narrative shows up (partnerships, integrations, real usage volume). If you’re thinking about entering, this unlock calendar is essential so you don’t get caught off guard.
👉 Are you watching these monthly NEWT unlocks, or do you only look at the price on the chart? Drop a comment.
Tip: clicking the coin tag takes you straight to the trading screen — a practical shortcut if you were going to trade anyway. And it also helps keep this content active here. 🙌 #Newt
BTC tested 64,400 by the end of the weekend — but the U.S. attacked Iran for the third time this week, and Tehran closed the Strait of Hormuz again. Who’s going to win this week’s tug-of-war starting tomorrow? 👀
The market is split between two opposing signals: on one side, the price testing a technical resistance that could open the way to the June 15 high, at 67,250; on the other, fresh geopolitical tension is pressuring oil and making any risk asset more nervous.
What I’m watching this week: Above 64,400 with confirmation (strong close, volume rising): opened path to first target 65,800–66,500, and then 67,250. Below 62,000: loses momentum and could go back to retest the 60,000 range, which held at the end of June. The key point: while geopolitical risk stays hot, I’d rather see the market confirm strength before buying the breakout. My read: with technical overextension still stretched on the charts and fresh geopolitical news on the radar, I wouldn’t enter leveraged chasing the top right now.
Trading tip for today: • Spot: I’d rather accumulate near 60,000–61,000 than buy the breakout in the heat of the moment.
• Futures: $BTC I would only go long with confirmation of a daily closing above 64,400, target 65,800, stop below 63,000. If it rejects here and loses 62,000, you can think about a short scalp down to 60,500, stop above 63,200.
This is just my personal view, not investment advice — crypto is high-risk territory and geopolitical news can change everything fast. Are you buying the breakout or waiting for the pullback to enter cheaper? 👇
Tip: click the coin tag for futures and the chart for spot to jump straight to the trading screen — a practical shortcut if you were going to trade anyway. And it also helps keep this content active here. 🙌 #BTC #TradingSignals #Geopolitics #strategy #economy
BTC, ETH and BNB: the chart shows recovery, but the market’s backstage tells another story
In my last posts I talked about support, resistance and isolated technical signals. Today I want to bring together two things that usually show up separately here: what the indicators are showing right now and what’s going on behind the curtain, in the macro scenario, that very few people on Square are connecting with price. What do the three charts have in common Looking at BTC, ETH, and BNB on the daily timeframe, you can see a pattern that repeats across all three: price recovering strongly from the recent low, but still trading below the 80- and 200-period moving averages — meaning, technically it’s still in a bearish trend in the medium/long term, even with the relief in the short term.
The Newton feature that could solve the biggest multichain problem — and almost nobody is talking about
After writing a lot about the Mainnet Beta, the VaultKit, and compliance-as-code of @NewtonProtocol , I decided to go after what comes next. And I found a piece that, in my opinion, is as important as all of that put together: the Multichain Newton Keystore Rollup. The problem no one talks about out loud Today, if you want a security rule to work across multiple blockchains — Base, Ethereum, some new L2 that showed up last month — you practically have to recreate that rule on each network. Each chain has its own permission system, its own limitations, its own execution cost. In practice, that means the protection you configured in one place doesn’t necessarily protect you in another.
@NewtonProtocol is about to launch something that nobody has mentioned here on Square yet.
While everyone debates whether Newton will become the standard for onchain compliance, I noticed an announcement from them almost unnoticed: the Verifiable Automation Marketplace. In practice, this will be a space where anyone can publish, discover, and "contract" AI agents that have already been audited against the protocol’s rules. In other words, it’s no longer just me setting up my own bot and hoping for the best—I’ll be able to choose an agent that has already been proven mathematically to follow the right risk limits.
What this changes: For those who don’t know how to code, it opens the door to using serious automation without depending on shady third parties. For builders, it creates a way to monetize audited strategies instead of selling "signals" with no guarantee whatsoever. It lowers the barrier that currently separates retail from institutions in accessing this kind of tool. My take: if this actually comes to life as promised, it could be the trigger that helps Newton move from the phase of "an interesting technical project" to "infrastructure that people truly use." There’s still no official launch date, and that weighs against it—promise isn’t delivery.
Do you think a marketplace for audited agents will democratize automation in DeFi, or just another feature that looks great in the whitepaper and never takes off? #Newt #Web3 $NEWT
Newton Protocol: The Missing Layer Before Every On-Chain Transaction
After writing about the @NewtonProtocol a few times, I decided to go deeper and see what has changed since the mainnet beta went live. And I confess: I liked what I found. Not because it’s perfect, but because it looks like a project that understands the real problem with institutional crypto — the lack of control before the money moves. The core idea remains the same: Newton is an authorization layer that sits between a transaction’s intent and its on-chain settlement. It’s a milestone that’s been under construction for a long time, and Newton Protocol is live on Base and Ethereum, enforcing rules directly on-chain. In other words, it’s no longer just a whitepaper promise. It’s already running.
I published about Newton Mainnet Beta and wanted to bring up a point that goes unnoticed: Newton Protocol (@NewtonProtocol ) is not addressing "compliance" in the bureaucratic sense — it solves the problem of DeFi vault curators promising rules that nobody actually checks. With VaultKit, those rules become checks executed within the contract itself, before the transaction settles, not after. What validates this in practice are the data partners plugged into the mesh: Chainalysis for sanctions, vaults.fyi for vault health, RedStone for prices, Credora and Webacy for risk. This is different from a pretty dashboard — it’s enforcement happening onchain, right now, already active on Base and Ethereum.
With curated vault TVL growing more than 350% over the last year, it makes sense for the authorization layer to arrive now. I’ll be watching how the Newton Explorer logs these checks over the next few weeks. #newt $NEWT #DEFİ #Web3
3 simple indicators to trade crypto more cautiously
People who are just starting out in the crypto market often get lost in all the indicators on the chart. Here are 3 that, together, help a lot—explained in a simple way: 1. Parabolic SAR — "the trend thermometer" Those little dots above or below the price. Dots below the price = an uptrend. Dots above = a downtrend. It also works as a "trailing stop": if the price crosses the dots, it’s a sign that the momentum has shifted. 2. Moving Averages — "the market structure" These are lines that show the average price over different time periods (short, medium, and long term). When the price is above all of them, the overall structure is healthier. When it crosses downward, it’s a sign of weakening.
BTC is back to 63K, but is this recovery real or just a breather?
Folks, let’s take it easy here because the daily chart of $BTC is telling an interesting story. After hitting the high at 82.850 in May, Bitcoin dropped hard, reaching 57.800 at the beginning of July. In the last few days it has reacted and returned to the 63.700 range, up more than 1.6% on the last candle. 👆👆👆👆👆 The detail that catches my attention: the price is still below the 80- and 200-period moving averages (70.488 and 74.188), which shows that in the medium/long term the trend is still bearish. But in the short term, the SAR has flipped to below the price, and the 8-period MA has already crossed above—signals that often indicate some buying momentum coming in. The Stoch RSI is already up there, almost stretched (87–89), so there’s no harm in keeping an eye on a possible pullback before it continues rising.
Newton Protocol: the “compliance-as-code” nobody is discussing enough
Most AI automation projects onchain focus on speed and returns. The Newton Protocol (@NewtonProtocol ) chose to solve a more boring, but more structural, problem: how to make autonomous agents and institutions comply with onchain rules without relying on manual review. In practice, this is how it works: builders write policies (in languages like Rego), and a decentralized network of operators — ensured by restaking via EigenLayer and by $NEWT — evaluates each transaction inside Trusted Execution Environments, generating cryptographic proofs that the checks were performed correctly. Anyone can audit this through the Newton Explorer. It’s different from “trusting” an AI agent: it’s verifying mathematically that it followed the rules.
Who said DeFi can’t have real-time compliance? 🛑🏦 The big topic around @NewtonProtocol ($NEWT ) on social media has moved up a level with the launch of its Mainnet Beta. The market finally understood that Newton isn’t just another AI narrative, but the answer to the biggest bottleneck in on-chain finance: pre-transaction risk management.
With the official integration of RedStone oracles and Credora risk data, the protocol now validates complex policies, compliance constraints, and volatility limits before the block gets liquidated. If the rules are violated, the transaction simply doesn’t go through. Economically protected via restaking on EigenLayer, Newton is building the rails that major funds needed to trust autonomous trading agents.
It’s the end of “liquidate first and fix the damage later.” Do you think this compliance barrier will speed up institutional entry into the ecosystem? 👇 #newt #defi #Web3 #crypto #Eigenlayer
🚀 The illusion of choice in AI: Who really controls your money? A look at the Newton Protocol (NEWT) 🤖💼 Have you ever stopped to think about who truly makes decisions when an AI agent manages funds from a treasury? Reading a recent, in-depth analysis of how @NewtonProtocol works, I realized that the revolution of "Agentic Finance" hides a silent and fascinating layer.
🔍 How does the magic really happen? Most people focus on Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZK) or pure automation, but the real innovation is between the AI’s decision and the execution on-chain. AI agents don’t execute transactions; they only propose them. The action enters a waiting state (in fractions of a second) while smart contracts verify compliance policies (like liquidity or the change in a vault’s APY) without the vault even knowing it’s being evaluated.
⚡ Compliance at the speed of a block Bureaucracy and the "friction" haven’t disappeared. What a human compliance officer would take days to analyze, the Newton Protocol resolves at the speed of validating a single block. The checks happen fast enough that we barely notice, invisibly shaping and filtering the bots’ behavior.
🧠 The big question remains: If an AI agent’s authority to act is, in reality, just the outcome of the strict policies it must satisfy behind the scenes... at what point does the agent stop being the "decision-maker" and the policy code itself takes over? And would you trust an AI agent generating returns, knowing there’s this hidden layer setting the rules? Share your opinion in the comments! 👇 #newt $NEWT
The Constant-Time Barrier in Newton: Cryptographic Security vs. Lateral Latency Leakage
In the current landscape of security in decentralized networks, protection against side-channel attacks has become a watershed moment. The @NewtonProtocol takes a rigorous stance by implementing audited cryptographic libraries in constant time (constant-time) for essential algorithms such as secp256k1 (used to generate signatures) and HPKE (Hybrid Public Key Encryption). This approach ensures that, regardless of the input data or the private keys used, the execution time of complex mathematical operations is rigorously the same. In practice, this neutralizes an attacker’s ability to measure variations of milliseconds (or microseconds) to infer bits of a secret key.
Long alert at $JUP 🚀 The par JUP/USDT is testing crucial support along the ascending trendline on the 4H chart around 0.2075. If the structure holds, we expect an upward move toward the targets outlined in the analysis. A recovery of 0.2140 confirms the strength of the move. 🔹 Entry (Long): 0.2080 - 0.2120 🔹 Target 1: 0.2220 🔹 Target 2: 0.2300 🔹 Target 3: 0.2400 🔹 Stop Loss: 0.2040 Risk management is essential. Watch for a break below 0.2075 that invalidates the pattern. #JUP #TradingSignals #FutureTradingSignals #strategy #Square
Global Tension and Charts: What to Expect from Bitcoin and Ethereum Now?
Hey, Binance Square community! Today I want to talk directly with you about what's going on in the world and how this whole mess is colliding head-on with our BTC and ETH charts in these first days of July. First, let's look out into the world. The weather has weighed heavily due to news that the US attacked military targets in Iran, finally ending the peace agreement for good. When a war-level tension like that happens, the price of oil skyrockets and the traditional financial market goes into panic. What do big investors do? They pull money out of risk and rush to safety. And, whether we like it or not, in the short term the crypto market suffers from this capital flight.
Newton Protocol and DeFi: The End of "Black Boxes" in Crypto Automation
Hey, Binance Square crew! If you’re like me and spend hours analyzing futures charts, managing margins, and trying to optimize every trade, you’ve probably noticed a major dilemma in our ecosystem: automation in DeFi is amazing, but entrusting your capital to robots or automated strategies has always come with that uneasy feeling. That’s exactly where the @NewtonProtocol (NEWT) comes in to change the game and differentiate itself from everything we have in the market. The big problem with traditional DeFi tools is that they work like "black boxes." You set up a bot or deposit into a pool and just hope the code runs everything correctly and that the market doesn’t go against you. If the algorithm fails or the market enters extreme volatility, your bankroll can be liquidated before you even have a chance to react.
The brilliant engineering of @NewtonProtocol (secure rollups, cryptographic verification, autonomous AI) faces its biggest test: US!!! Our new infographic illustrates this strange reality. On one side, the technical complexity and the robot managing assets. On the other, a young person hesitating about whether an app "good enough" is truly convenient.
The real challenge isn’t the code, but human behavior. The market ignores impressive engineering if it isn’t impossible to ignore in practice. The Newton Protocol needs to prove that the lack of trust in AI is a painful frustration that only it can solve. Innovation only wins when the old becomes harder than the new.