Z I Z U

@Plasma #plasma $XPL
Crypto talks a lot about changing the world. New chains launch, bold promises are made and technical breakthroughs are celebrated. But when you step back and look at what actually reaches everyday people, the gap is still huge. Most innovations stay locked inside technical circles, far away from the lives they’re supposed to improve. That’s why Plasma immediately stood out to me. It doesn’t feel like a project chasing hype. It feels like one built to quietly solve a real problem at global scale.
At its heart, Plasma is about stablecoins and how they move through the world. Stablecoins have already become essential for millions of people. They’re used to send money home, protect savings from inflation, and handle everyday payments where traditional banking simply doesn’t work. But despite their importance, stablecoins often just sit idle. Plasma asks a simple but powerful question: what if this capital could do more, safely and transparently, without adding complexity for users?
What I personally appreciate most about Plasma is its focus on distribution, not just technology. Many projects build impressive systems but forget that real adoption depends on meeting people where they already are. Plasma integrates its onchain yield infrastructure into familiar financial environments, so users don’t have to change their habits or learn something new. From the user’s perspective, things just work and that’s exactly how mass adoption happens.
This matters because most people don’t want to think about smart contracts, lending mechanics, or blockchain architecture. They care about trust, stability and ease of use. Plasma respects that reality. Behind the scenes, it runs on audited, institutionally designed lending rails. On the surface, it feels simple and reliable. That balance is incredibly hard to achieve, and it’s something I think Plasma does exceptionally well.
Another reason Plasma resonates with me is its relevance to financial inclusion. For people who live outside traditional banking systems, digital dollars are not an experiment, they are a necessity. Plasma strengthens this reality by making stablecoin capital productive without exposing users to unnecessary risk or confusion. Yield generation becomes a background benefit, not a complicated strategy.
Plasma Coin plays an important role in this ecosystem, but it doesn’t feel like a token created just for speculation. Its purpose is tied to real usage, real flows and long-term participation. That’s something I value deeply. In a space filled with short-term narratives, Plasma feels patient. It’s built for sustainability, not just attention.
Transparency is another area where Plasma earns my trust. Everything settles openly onchain, which means the system can be verified rather than blindly trusted. In an industry that has seen too many failures due to opacity, this commitment to visibility is not optional, it’s essential. Plasma understands that trust is built through proof, not promises.
What’s also exciting is how Plasma bridges the gap between traditional financial behavior and onchain innovation. Users don’t need to “be crypto experts” to benefit. They can allocate stablecoins as they normally would, while Plasma’s infrastructure does the heavy lifting underneath. This is exactly how new financial systems should evolve, gradually, invisibly and without friction.
From a broader perspective, I see Plasma as part of a much larger shift. Stablecoins are no longer just tools for trading or moving funds quickly. They’re becoming the backbone of global payments and savings. Plasma accelerates this shift by providing rails that can handle massive scale while staying secure and transparent.
To me, Plasma isn’t loud, flashy, or overpromised and that’s its strength. It’s focused on building something durable, something that can support millions, and eventually billions, of people. By solving the distribution problem and pairing it with serious infrastructure, Plasma brings onchain finance closer to everyday life.
In the end, Plasma Coin represents a vision I genuinely believe in: a world where stablecoins don’t just exist but actively work for people everywhere. Not through complexity or speculation, but through reliability, access and quiet efficiency. This is the kind of progress crypto actually needs, and why Plasma feels like it’s building for the long run, not the moment.

Blockchain has been around long enough to prove its potential. We already know it can change industries, redefine ownership and give people more control over their digital lives. The problem is that for most people, blockchain still feels distant, complicated and expensive. That gap between promise and reality is exactly where Vanry Coin steps in.
What drew me to Vanry wasn’t flashy claims or exaggerated numbers. It was the feeling that this project actually understands how people use technology in their everyday lives. Vanry doesn’t try to impress by being complicated. Instead, it focuses on being useful, fast, affordable and accessible and in my opinion, that’s what truly matters if blockchain is ever going to reach the mainstream.
Built to Handle Growth Without Breaking
One of the biggest frustrations with many blockchain networks is how quickly they struggle once usage increases. Everything works fine at first but as more people join, transactions slow down and costs rise. Vanry feels different because it was designed with growth in mind from the very beginning.
It can handle a large number of transactions smoothly, which makes it suitable for environments where speed and consistency are non-negotiable. Whether it’s digital entertainment, financial interactions, or large user communities, Vanry doesn’t feel fragile. To me, that reliability creates confidence, not just for developers but for everyday users who simply want things to work.
Fees So Low You Stop Thinking About Them
High transaction fees quietly ruin the user experience. When people hesitate before clicking a button because it might cost too much, something is clearly broken. Vanry solves this problem in a way that feels refreshingly simple by keeping transaction costs extremely low and predictable.
From my point of view, this is one of Vanry’s most powerful strengths. When fees become almost invisible, people can focus on what they’re actually doing rather than worrying about cost. This opens the door to frequent interactions, small-value transfers and creative ideas that just aren’t practical on expensive networks. Vanry makes blockchain feel lightweight instead of heavy.
Speed That Feels Natural
In today’s digital world, we’re used to instant feedback. Waiting even a few seconds can feel frustrating. Vanry understands this reality and delivers transaction speeds that feel immediate and natural.
What I personally appreciate is how this speed changes the emotional experience of using blockchain. It stops feeling like a slow, technical process and starts feeling like a modern digital service. That shift is important because people don’t adopt technology just because it’s decentralized, they adopt it because it feels good to use.
Welcoming People Instead of Intimidating Them
Blockchain often feels like a closed club where only the technically skilled feel comfortable. Vanry takes a different approach by focusing on simplicity and ease of entry. The experience is designed to feel welcoming rather than overwhelming.
I believe this mindset is essential. If blockchain is meant to empower people, it shouldn’t scare them away with complexity. Vanry lowers that barrier, making it easier for individuals and businesses to step into decentralized systems without feeling lost or excluded.
Security You Don’t Have to Question
Trust is everything in blockchain. Vanry builds on a foundation that has already proven its security over time, which adds an extra layer of reassurance. Instead of experimenting recklessly, it improves and optimizes what is already known to be secure.
From my perspective, this shows maturity. True innovation isn’t about taking unnecessary risks, it’s about making smart improvements while protecting users. Vanry strikes that balance in a way that feels responsible and thoughtful.
Flexible Enough to Support Creativity
Every project has different needs, and Vanry recognizes that. By customizing its underlying structure, it allows developers to build efficiently without being boxed into rigid limitations.
To me, flexibility is what turns a blockchain into a living ecosystem. When builders are free to create without fighting the system, better ideas emerge. Vanry provides that creative breathing room while still maintaining structure and performance.
Independence That Strengthens the Network
By operating as its own foundational network, Vanry maintains control over how it evolves. This independence allows it to grow based on the needs of its community rather than external constraints.
I see this as a long-term advantage. Independence means clearer direction, faster improvements and the ability to stay aligned with the original vision. It also reinforces the idea that decentralization isn’t just a feature, it’s a philosophy.
Thinking About the Planet, Not Just Profits
Environmental responsibility is no longer something blockchain projects can ignore. Vanry’s commitment to green energy and a zero carbon footprint reflects an understanding of the bigger picture.
Personally, this matters to me a lot. Technology should move us forward without leaving damage behind. Vanry proves that high performance doesn’t have to come at the cost of sustainability and that balance is something the industry desperately needs.
Why Vanry Coin Feels Different
Vanry Coin doesn’t feel like a project chasing attention. It feels like a project quietly building something solid. Its focus on speed, affordability, usability, security and sustainability creates an experience that feels grounded and realistic.
In my opinion, Vanry represents the kind of blockchain future people actually want, one where technology fades into the background and usefulness takes center stage. It’s not about hype or complexity. It’s about making decentralized systems work for real people, in real situations, every single day.
If blockchain is ever going to become part of everyday life, it will be because of projects like Vanry that choose practicality over noise and long-term value over short-term excitement.
@Vanar

@Walrus 🦭/acc
Digital archives are the modern equivalent of libraries, museums, and historical records. Yet, unlike physical archives, digital information can vanish overnight if improperly stored. From my point of view, Walrus Coin addresses one of the most critical, yet overlooked, needs of the digital age: reliable long-term storage.
We live in an era where historical, scientific, financial, and cultural data is created at unprecedented speed. Preserving this data requires a system that can survive node failures, human error, and even market volatility. Walrus approaches this problem with a philosophy I deeply respect: treat permanence as a protocol-level requirement, not an optional feature.
I am particularly impressed by the way Walrus fragments and redundantly distributes data. This ensures that even if portions of the network fail or become corrupted, the overall archive remains intact. From my perspective, this is essential for any serious effort to preserve digital history for future generations.
Beyond technical reliability, Walrus also addresses the human aspect. Archives are only valuable if they are accessible and verifiable. By designing mechanisms that allow data to be proven intact and retrievable, Walrus ensures that information can be trusted—not just stored. Personally, I find this dual focus on availability and verifiability to be a defining feature that separates it from ordinary storage solutions.
The broader implication, from my point of view, is that Walrus Coin is shaping how civilization preserves knowledge in the digital age. It is not flashy or hyped, but it solves a problem whose importance grows every year. As more institutions, developers, and individuals recognize the fragility of digital records, the relevance of durable decentralized storage like Walrus will only increase.
In my assessment, projects that succeed over decades are those that solve foundational problems quietly but effectively. Walrus Coin fits this mold perfectly. By prioritizing long-term reliability and trustworthiness in data storage, it contributes to a future where digital knowledge can be preserved, shared, and relied upon indefinitely.
#Walrus $WAL

@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL
Environmental sustainability is a topic that cannot be ignored in decentralized networks. In my view, blockchain systems are only truly valuable if they are designed with long-term resource efficiency in mind. Walrus Coin addresses this head-on by optimizing storage processes and minimizing unnecessary energy waste.
Traditional storage solutions, whether centralized data centers or cloud providers, consume enormous amounts of electricity. Redundancy is often managed inefficiently, and data is copied or moved in ways that increase the carbon footprint. Walrus, by contrast, distributes data intelligently across participants, leveraging existing resources efficiently. From my perspective, this is not just smart design, it is responsible engineering.
The system’s incentives also encourage sustainable behavior. Storage providers are rewarded for maintaining data accurately and efficiently, discouraging wasteful practices. Economically aligned sustainability is something I personally find critical. It ensures that the network’s growth does not come at the expense of the environment.
Additionally, Walrus anticipates long-term technological shifts. As storage hardware evolves and becomes more energy-efficient, the network can integrate improvements without compromising data integrity. This forward-looking approach contrasts sharply with many legacy systems, which often become locked into resource-intensive designs.
From my perspective, sustainability in decentralized storage is about more than optics. It is about creating networks that can endure, scale, and maintain reliability without becoming a burden on natural resources. Walrus Coin embodies this principle, balancing the tension between redundancy, reliability and efficiency in a way that feels thoughtful and responsible.
Personally, I see environmental considerations as inseparable from long-term network viability. A system that cannot persist responsibly in the real world cannot truly be decentralized in a meaningful sense. Walrus Coin demonstrates that durable storage and environmental mindfulness can coexist, which is increasingly rare in the blockchain space.

Blockchain is often praised for enabling “trustless” systems, networks where transactions and interactions occur without reliance on traditional intermediaries. Yet, in practice, many so-called trustless systems still rely on social assumptions, visibility, or centralized tools to function. Dusk Coin redefines trustless interactions by making privacy, verification, and compliance coexist naturally. From my perspective, this approach represents a maturation of blockchain design, moving it from theoretical promise to practical reliability.
Traditional trustless systems assume that exposing everything to the network guarantees correctness. While this works mathematically, it has unintended consequences. Public data creates opportunities for manipulation, incentivizes reactive behavior, and exposes sensitive strategies. Small participants are disadvantaged, and institutions are often hesitant to engage. Dusk Coin challenges this model by showing that trustlessness does not require full exposure, it requires verifiable integrity without unnecessary disclosure. Personally, I find this distinction profound because it aligns technology with real-world human and organizational behavior.
At the core of Dusk Coin’s approach is cryptographic assurance. Transactions, smart contracts, and governance processes are verifiable without revealing sensitive details. This maintains accountability while preserving strategic discretion. From my perspective, this is the first step toward creating decentralized systems that can actually support complex, real-world activity rather than just token speculation or simple transfers.
The implications for user behavior are significant. In transparent systems, participants often act defensively because every action is visible. Strategies are compromised, and risk-taking is minimized. Dusk Coin changes the environment: by shielding sensitive information while maintaining verifiability, it allows participants to act strategically and confidently. Personally, I see this as a subtle but transformative way to make blockchain behavior more human-centered.
Another advantage is risk mitigation. Full transparency exposes networks to exploitation—from front-running and pattern analysis to targeted attacks. Dusk Coin reduces these vulnerabilities by limiting what is visible, without compromising correctness. From my perspective, this combination of trustless verification and privacy makes the network resilient against both technical and economic threats.
Institutional engagement is also facilitated. Most institutions hesitate to participate in decentralized networks due to privacy concerns or regulatory risk. Dusk Coin addresses these issues through selective disclosure. Compliance can be proven, risk assessed, and governance participation verified—all without exposing sensitive positions. Personally, I believe this capability is crucial for bridging the gap between experimental blockchain projects and mainstream financial ecosystems.
Governance benefits similarly. Voting, proposal submissions, and decision-making processes can occur in a trustless yet confidential manner. Participants can act honestly without fear of coercion, retaliation, or social pressure. In my view, this elevates the concept of decentralized governance beyond theoretical constructs into something practical and human-compatible.
The strategic dimension is equally important. Participants can design, negotiate, and execute complex agreements without fear that their intentions will be publicly exposed. This encourages long-term planning, thoughtful decision-making, and collaborative experimentation. Personally, I find this a game-changer for industries like decentralized finance, corporate asset management, and multi-party contracts.
Dusk Coin also demonstrates that privacy and trustlessness are not contradictory. Many assume that hiding data undermines trust. In reality, trust can be established through verifiable rules rather than exposure. Cryptography ensures correctness, selective disclosure ensures compliance, and privacy ensures participants retain autonomy. From my perspective, this balance is what distinguishes Dusk Coin from networks that rely solely on transparency to enforce trust.
The psychological impact should not be underestimated. When trustless systems expose participants to constant observation, behavior becomes reactive or defensive. By removing unnecessary scrutiny, Dusk Coin allows authentic interaction, fostering confidence and reducing decision fatigue. Personally, I see this as a foundational factor for building sustainable engagement in decentralized networks.
Critics may argue that confidential trustless systems are overly complex. While the technical implementation is sophisticated, the user experience remains simple: participants gain privacy and strategic control without needing to manage the underlying cryptography. From my perspective, this is an elegant design trade-off, complexity is absorbed by the system, not the user.
Ultimately, Dusk Coin transforms the concept of “trustless” from a theoretical claim into a practical, usable framework. It shows that participants can interact confidently, maintain strategic privacy, and remain accountable, all without intermediaries. Personally, I see this as a critical evolution in blockchain design, moving networks closer to real-world applicability rather than abstract experimentation.
In conclusion, Dusk Coin’s approach to trustless interactions is both innovative and human-centered. It preserves the integrity and autonomy of participants while enabling complex, verifiable interactions. From my perspective, this subtle but fundamental shift could define the next generation of blockchain ecosystems, setting a new standard for how decentralized systems support both individual and institutional engagement.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

When most people think about decentralized finance (DeFi), they imagine lending protocols, automated market makers, or token swaps. Rarely do they consider the foundational infrastructure that makes these systems reliable. From my perspective, this is exactly where Walrus Coin proves its long-term value.
DeFi relies on transparent, persistent, and verifiable data. Every loan, every collateralized position, and every smart contract depends on historical information being accurate and accessible. Without it, trust crumbles. Walrus focuses precisely on this problem: ensuring that critical data remains available in a decentralized, censorship-resistant manner.
From my point of view, Walrus acts like the quiet backbone of the DeFi ecosystem. It may not appear in flashy dashboards or trading charts, but it underpins the reliability of systems that billions of dollars eventually flow through. Without consistent data availability, smart contracts could malfunction, audits could fail and systemic risk could escalate.
Another perspective I value is that Walrus doesn’t compete with DeFi applications, it supports them. By providing durable storage, it frees developers to focus on financial logic and innovation rather than worrying about whether historical states, transaction data, or user interactions will remain accessible. That separation of concerns is critical for scalable and secure DeFi ecosystems.
Economically, the integration is elegant. Reliable storage reduces operational risk, which in turn increases confidence among users and institutional participants. As someone who studies both technology and market behavior, I see this as a subtle but vital contribution: infrastructure that lowers systemic friction often has outsized long-term impact.
Personally, I believe the projects that endure in DeFi will not be the ones with the flashiest interfaces or the most aggressive tokenomics, they will be the ones built on durable, reliable foundations. Walrus Coin exemplifies that philosophy, quietly enabling complex financial interactions while ensuring that the underlying data ecosystem is trustworthy and persistent.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL

In the modern financial landscape, information is power. The ability to understand, anticipate, and react to market moves often determines success or failure. Public blockchains, despite their promise of decentralization, often expose critical data that can be exploited by others. Dusk Coin challenges this paradigm by embedding confidentiality into transaction execution, offering participants a strategic advantage without compromising integrity. From my perspective, this approach represents a fundamental shift in how blockchain can be used for meaningful financial activity.
Most traditional blockchain networks operate under full visibility. Every transaction is recorded and accessible, often permanently. While this creates a transparent ledger, it introduces a subtle form of inequality: sophisticated actors can analyze patterns, front-run trades, or manipulate outcomes based on publicly available data. Smaller participants, or those without advanced analytics, are disproportionately disadvantaged. Dusk Coin resolves this imbalance by ensuring that sensitive transaction details remain private while preserving verifiable correctness. Personally, I find this not only fair but essential for long-term network viability.
Confidential transactions allow participants to plan strategically without fear of exposing their intentions. Businesses, funds, and even individual investors can execute complex moves—whether portfolio adjustments, asset transfers, or multi-party contracts—without alerting competitors. In my view, this capability changes the way blockchain can interact with real-world finance. It is no longer purely speculative or experimental; it becomes operationally useful and strategically viable.
The technology behind this is subtle yet powerful. Dusk Coin uses cryptographic proofs to validate transactions while keeping key details hidden. This means that the network can enforce rules, prevent fraud, and maintain ledger integrity without requiring participants to reveal sensitive information. From my perspective, this represents a sophisticated evolution in blockchain design that balances transparency, accountability, and privacy.
One of the most interesting implications is the effect on market behavior. When participants know that transactions are confidential, they are less likely to react to noise, manipulate outcomes, or engage in opportunistic behavior. Markets become more deliberate, rational, and efficient. Personally, I find this transformation compelling because it demonstrates that blockchain can improve not only individual outcomes but systemic fairness.
Confidential transactions also foster innovation. Developers can design advanced financial instruments, decentralized lending structures, or multi-party agreements that would be too risky on fully transparent networks. This encourages experimentation, creativity, and long-term thinking—qualities often sacrificed in hype-driven ecosystems. From my perspective, this positions Dusk Coin as a platform for serious, sustainable innovation rather than short-term speculation.
Another advantage is security. Publicly visible transactions can be targeted for attacks, whether through front-running, phishing, or network exploitation. By keeping critical details private while ensuring verifiability, Dusk Coin reduces exposure and strengthens network resilience. Personally, I see this as an elegant solution that addresses both human and technical vulnerabilities.
Strategic confidentiality also has regulatory benefits. Organizations can comply with legal requirements without broadcasting sensitive information. Selective disclosure ensures that authorities or auditors can verify legitimacy while participants maintain operational discretion. In my view, this balance between privacy and compliance is one of Dusk Coin’s most practical innovations, particularly for institutional adoption.
There is also a psychological component. Participants who operate under constant surveillance often make reactive or defensive decisions. Confidential transactions remove this pressure, allowing decision-making based on strategy and intent rather than fear of exposure. Personally, I believe this human-centered aspect is often overlooked but crucial for meaningful participation.
Critics may argue that private transactions reduce accountability or transparency. Dusk Coin counters this by ensuring that all transactions are verifiable through cryptographic proofs. Accountability is maintained, but unnecessary exposure is avoided. From my perspective, this distinction is a defining strength of the network, enabling both trust and discretion.
Ultimately, Dusk Coin demonstrates that privacy and strategy are not mutually exclusive. By enabling confidential transactions that are secure, verifiable, and compliant, it transforms blockchain from a public spectacle into a tool for serious, strategic engagement. Personally, I see this as a pivotal advancement that could redefine how decentralized networks support both individual and institutional decision-making.
In conclusion, Dusk Coin’s confidential transactions are not just a technical feature, they are a strategic enabler. They allow participants to act confidently, protect sensitive data, and engage meaningfully in decentralized ecosystems. From my perspective, this combination of privacy, accountability and utility positions Dusk Coin as a network built for thoughtful, long-term participation rather than short-term hype.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

Digital identity is one of the most critical yet underappreciated challenges in blockchain. While decentralized systems promise freedom and ownership, the reality is that identity verification, privacy, and trust are often at odds. Dusk Coin offers a unique solution by embedding privacy into identity management, creating a system where individuals and institutions can interact confidently without sacrificing personal or strategic information. From my perspective, this integration could reshape how we think about identity in decentralized networks.
Traditional blockchains often equate identity with public visibility. Wallet addresses, transaction histories, and contract interactions are transparent and immutable. While this allows verification, it creates a paradox: users are either anonymous to the point of untraceability or entirely exposed. Neither extreme is suitable for practical adoption. Dusk Coin addresses this by allowing participants to prove legitimacy or compliance without revealing extraneous information, providing a middle ground that feels far more realistic. Personally, I find this approach elegant and necessary.
Digital identity in financial systems carries high stakes. Exposure of personal or corporate data can lead to exploitation, regulatory penalties, or loss of competitive advantage. Dusk Coin allows participants to retain control over what they disclose, essentially giving them ownership over their own identity in the digital world. From my perspective, this is more than just a technical improvement—it is an ethical choice that respects autonomy.
The system also enhances trust without compromising privacy. For instance, users can verify qualifications, ownership, or authorization through cryptographic proofs without exposing sensitive details. This makes interactions safer, more efficient, and more credible. Personally, I see this as a critical enabler for complex applications such as regulated finance, legal agreements, or cross-border transactions.
Another advantage of Dusk Coin’s approach is reducing identity-related friction. In many blockchains, verification requires revealing extensive data or relying on third-party intermediaries. Dusk Coin’s selective disclosure model streamlines identity verification while minimizing exposure. From my point of view, this is essential for scaling real-world adoption because it balances usability with security.
The privacy-first design also encourages innovation in decentralized applications. Developers can create solutions that rely on verified identities without risking sensitive information. This opens doors for sectors like healthcare, supply chain, and institutional finance, where identity and privacy are simultaneously critical. Personally, I believe this could accelerate meaningful blockchain adoption in industries that have historically been hesitant.
From a governance perspective, privacy in identity has profound implications. Voting, decision-making and organizational participation can be conducted confidentially yet verifiably. This prevents social pressure or strategic manipulation while maintaining accountability. In my view, this represents a new paradigm in decentralized governance, one that respects both privacy and collective responsibility.
Security is another key benefit. Digital identity exposure creates attack vectors. Publicly visible wallets, transaction patterns, and behavioral data can be exploited. By keeping sensitive identity-related information private while ensuring correctness through cryptographic verification, Dusk Coin significantly reduces potential vulnerabilities. Personally, I find this combination of privacy and security to be a defining feature.
Moreover, Dusk Coin respects the psychological dimension of identity. In many transparent systems, participants alter their behavior due to fear of observation. This affects both financial decisions and collaborative participation. By protecting sensitive identity data, Dusk Coin allows participants to engage authentically, make strategic choices confidently, and participate without undue pressure. From my perspective, this human-centered approach is rare and powerful.
Critics may argue that private identity systems can reduce transparency or auditability. Dusk Coin counters this concern through selective verifiability. Actions, qualifications, and compliance can all be proven without unnecessary exposure. Personally, I see this as a sophisticated balance between accountability and privacy that few networks have achieved.
Ultimately, Dusk Coin’s integration of privacy with digital identity is forward-looking. It recognizes that real adoption requires more than speed, decentralization, or throughput. It requires systems that respect individuals and institutions while enabling secure, verified participation. From my perspective, this is a critical step in moving blockchain from speculative hype to practical, everyday utility.
In conclusion, Dusk Coin demonstrates that privacy and identity can coexist in a decentralized system. Participants can retain control, institutions can verify legitimacy, and developers can innovate without compromise. Personally, I see this as one of the most promising aspects of the network, offering a blueprint for how digital identity should function in the next generation of blockchain ecosystems.

@Dusk_Foundation