AH啊豪
Verified Creator
alpha空投猎手｜链上交互狂人｜一级市场投研狩猎金狗｜币圈项目太多了，秉承错过了就等下波机会，心态特别重要！
USD1 Holder
High-Frequency Trader
5 Years
336 Following
44.0K+ Followers
25.3K+ Liked
2.1K+ Shared
Posts
All
Quotes
Live
PINNED
The primary market Chinese MeMe is on fire again‼️
Just entered 2026, Chinese MeMe coins
"I'm here now" have made a large group of people rich overnight
"Binance Life" has also listed on spot trading
Directly baffling foreign friends!
So there are still many opportunities in the primary market now!
But many people still don't take seriously the high fees in the primary market, not knowing that spending just one minute can save hundreds or even thousands of dollars in profits💰
👇👇👇
Now fill in Ahao's wallet invitation to save 30% in fees (the highest proportion allowed within market compliance). Over 300 people have already signed up, and future upgrades will allow me to adjust the ratio in real time for brothers. It's automatically returned by the system, no need for my intervention, completely worry-free about the risk of being scammed‼️
1️⃣ Enter Web3 wallet
2️⃣ Click Invite Friends
3️⃣ Click Participate Now
4️⃣ Enter: AAA111
5️⃣ Confirm Complete✅
Brothers who are bound can come to the homepage to join the group,
And sound the call to launch together on great projects!
#币安上线币安人生 $我踏马来了
Just entered 2026, Chinese MeMe coins
"I'm here now" have made a large group of people rich overnight
"Binance Life" has also listed on spot trading
Directly baffling foreign friends!
So there are still many opportunities in the primary market now!
But many people still don't take seriously the high fees in the primary market, not knowing that spending just one minute can save hundreds or even thousands of dollars in profits💰
👇👇👇
Now fill in Ahao's wallet invitation to save 30% in fees (the highest proportion allowed within market compliance). Over 300 people have already signed up, and future upgrades will allow me to adjust the ratio in real time for brothers. It's automatically returned by the system, no need for my intervention, completely worry-free about the risk of being scammed‼️
1️⃣ Enter Web3 wallet
2️⃣ Click Invite Friends
3️⃣ Click Participate Now
4️⃣ Enter: AAA111
5️⃣ Confirm Complete✅
Brothers who are bound can come to the homepage to join the group,
And sound the call to launch together on great projects!
#币安上线币安人生 $我踏马来了
Data-Driven Decision Making: How I Optimize the Use of ListaDAO by Monitoring Key Metrics
During the use of ListaDAO, I gradually shifted from intuitive operations to a data-driven decision-making approach. By continuously tracking and analyzing several core metrics, I can not only manage my positions more safely but also optimize returns at the right time.
The first category of metrics I focus on is the protocol health data. This includes the trend of total locked value changes, the distribution ratio of various collateral types, and the total circulation of lisUSD. A stable growth in TVL usually indicates an increase in protocol attractiveness, while diversification in collateral distribution can reduce systemic risk. I pay special attention to the proportion of slisBNB in the total collateral - as a native asset, an excessively high or low proportion may indicate different issues.
The first category of metrics I focus on is the protocol health data. This includes the trend of total locked value changes, the distribution ratio of various collateral types, and the total circulation of lisUSD. A stable growth in TVL usually indicates an increase in protocol attractiveness, while diversification in collateral distribution can reduce systemic risk. I pay special attention to the proportion of slisBNB in the total collateral - as a native asset, an excessively high or low proportion may indicate different issues.
Arbitrage Opportunities in the ListaDAO Ecosystem: Capturing Price and Interest Rate Differences Across Platforms
With a deeper understanding of the ListaDAO ecosystem, I have discovered more diverse arbitrage opportunities beyond basic borrowing and lending arbitrage. These opportunities arise from price or interest rate differences of the same asset across different platforms, as well as unique incentive mechanisms within the ecosystem.
Cross-platform stablecoin price arbitrage is a classic yet effective strategy. Since lisUSD is an algorithmic stablecoin, its price is not always strictly pegged to 1 USD, and can sometimes fluctuate between 0.98 and 1.02. When the price of lisUSD on the DEX is significantly below 1 USD, I can purchase lisUSD at a low price on the DEX, and then repay the debt through ListaDAO's redemption mechanism at a value close to 1 USD, earning the intermediate price difference. Conversely, when lisUSD is at a premium, I can mint lisUSD through collateralized loans and sell it on the DEX. This type of arbitrage helps maintain the price stability of lisUSD, while arbitrageurs can also profit from it.
Cross-platform stablecoin price arbitrage is a classic yet effective strategy. Since lisUSD is an algorithmic stablecoin, its price is not always strictly pegged to 1 USD, and can sometimes fluctuate between 0.98 and 1.02. When the price of lisUSD on the DEX is significantly below 1 USD, I can purchase lisUSD at a low price on the DEX, and then repay the debt through ListaDAO's redemption mechanism at a value close to 1 USD, earning the intermediate price difference. Conversely, when lisUSD is at a premium, I can mint lisUSD through collateralized loans and sell it on the DEX. This type of arbitrage helps maintain the price stability of lisUSD, while arbitrageurs can also profit from it.
The Future Development of ListaDAO: Long-term Value from Protocol Evolution and Community Governance
After long-term use and participation in the governance of ListaDAO, I began to think about the future development direction of this protocol and how these developments will affect its long-term value. From the protocol's technical roadmap, governance proposals, and community discussions, I can see several clear trends.
The possibility of multi-chain expansion is currently a hot topic in community discussions. Although ListaDAO is deeply rooted in the BNB chain, it may replicate its core liquid staking lending model to other PoS chains with similar demands through cross-chain technology or native multi-chain deployment in the future. This would significantly expand the protocol's potential market but would also bring challenges in cross-chain security and governance complexity. I am closely monitoring the relevant technical solutions and community votes, as this could determine whether ListaDAO remains as an exclusive infrastructure for the BNB chain or grows into a cross-chain universal protocol.
The possibility of multi-chain expansion is currently a hot topic in community discussions. Although ListaDAO is deeply rooted in the BNB chain, it may replicate its core liquid staking lending model to other PoS chains with similar demands through cross-chain technology or native multi-chain deployment in the future. This would significantly expand the protocol's potential market but would also bring challenges in cross-chain security and governance complexity. I am closely monitoring the relevant technical solutions and community votes, as this could determine whether ListaDAO remains as an exclusive infrastructure for the BNB chain or grows into a cross-chain universal protocol.
Plasma XPL: The Ultimate Liquidity Protocol - Coordinating the Value Gravity of a Fragmented World
The world of encryption is falling into a self-created paradox: to expand and achieve autonomy, we have created countless chains and Rollups; yet each new chain further splits the already scarce liquidity, forming isolated "liquidity ponds." Users and funds are trapped between islands, while cross-chain bridges have become fragile and dangerous single points of failure. The industry's current "multi-chain" or "L2 era" is essentially a highly fragmented liquidity apocalypse.
The solution is not to return to the old path of one chain ruling them all, but to require a brand new layer of abstraction: a "super protocol" that does not directly carry assets but can efficiently coordinate, guide, and integrate all fragmented liquidity. I believe that Plasma XPL and its network, with its core positioning and design, have the potential to evolve into a key component of this ultimate liquidity protocol, or even its core coordinating layer.
The solution is not to return to the old path of one chain ruling them all, but to require a brand new layer of abstraction: a "super protocol" that does not directly carry assets but can efficiently coordinate, guide, and integrate all fragmented liquidity. I believe that Plasma XPL and its network, with its core positioning and design, have the potential to evolve into a key component of this ultimate liquidity protocol, or even its core coordinating layer.
Wow, I've been stuck for half a day waiting for the transfer to arrive!
What should I do? Who can help me?
Until later when a friend recommended the public chain $XPL , I was completely impressed after using it just once. It's simply a "money-saving accelerator" for stablecoin transfers! Today, I must share this with everyone!
First of all, as a Layer 1 public chain focused on stablecoins, what surprised me the most about XPL is the zero transaction fee for USDT transfers!
Whether it's for giving employees a little salary or paying back a big shot some money last time, I didn't spend a single cent on Gas fees from start to finish.
Later, I learned that this is a special subsidy from the protocol layer, making stablecoins truly as easy to use as cash.
What's even more amazing is the speed; when I used it for the first time, I specifically counted the seconds, and the transaction confirmation only took sub-second level. It arrived instantly, without worrying about getting stuck halfway. (I was really scared of being stuck)
The main thing is that it's very friendly to us ordinary users. You can transfer directly without having to buy native tokens in advance. The operation is no different from other chains I usually use, and it's easy to get started.
I even paid special attention to the data; after XPL's mainnet launch, the stablecoin supply quickly surged from 5 billion to 7 billion, becoming one of the fastest-growing public chains in the industry.
After using it for a while, whether for small payments or large transfers, I haven't dropped a chain. I sincerely believe that being easy to use is the hard truth!
#plasma
@Plasma
What should I do? Who can help me?
Until later when a friend recommended the public chain $XPL , I was completely impressed after using it just once. It's simply a "money-saving accelerator" for stablecoin transfers! Today, I must share this with everyone!
First of all, as a Layer 1 public chain focused on stablecoins, what surprised me the most about XPL is the zero transaction fee for USDT transfers!
Whether it's for giving employees a little salary or paying back a big shot some money last time, I didn't spend a single cent on Gas fees from start to finish.
Later, I learned that this is a special subsidy from the protocol layer, making stablecoins truly as easy to use as cash.
What's even more amazing is the speed; when I used it for the first time, I specifically counted the seconds, and the transaction confirmation only took sub-second level. It arrived instantly, without worrying about getting stuck halfway. (I was really scared of being stuck)
The main thing is that it's very friendly to us ordinary users. You can transfer directly without having to buy native tokens in advance. The operation is no different from other chains I usually use, and it's easy to get started.
I even paid special attention to the data; after XPL's mainnet launch, the stablecoin supply quickly surged from 5 billion to 7 billion, becoming one of the fastest-growing public chains in the industry.
After using it for a while, whether for small payments or large transfers, I haven't dropped a chain. I sincerely believe that being easy to use is the hard truth!
#plasma
@Plasma
A few days ago, the rewards center distributed 5000 Dusk airdrop tokens to me, which made me feel that I must re-understand Dusk!
So I broke down the consensus mechanism of the Dusk network:
Why is "Sealed PoS" its core?
From what I understand, I found that it is actually different from most public chains; Dusk does not adopt the classic PoS, but a mechanism they call "Sealed-Bid Proof of Stake."
I spent two whole days studying its white paper, trying to understand the actual meaning of the word "sealed."
In simple terms, before each block is produced, potential block producers need to submit their bids (committing to lock a certain amount of tokens and time) in a cryptographic "black box," rather than broadcasting publicly.
Then, through an algorithm, the winner is secretly chosen.
Only the selected block producer needs to subsequently prove their qualification to the network.
I believe the goal of this design directly addresses two pain points:
One is to prevent large-scale staking pools from monopolizing block rights (because the pool cannot know in advance which participant should be put forward to compete); the second is to enhance the privacy of validator identities, reducing their risk of targeted attacks.
This completely fits Dusk's positioning in servicing institutional finance (such as Security Token Offerings, STOs).
Participants often wish to hide their strategies and position sizes.
However, from an engineering perspective, this mechanism is extremely complex and requires very high reliability in network latency and cryptographic components.
I attempted to run their testnet node and could feel the synchronization burden brought by this complexity.
Whether its advantages can be fully realized heavily depends on the scale of network adoption and the quality of participants.
If there are only a few nodes, privacy may actually decrease.
This is an engine designed for "future large-scale institutional applications"; currently, it is still in a medium to low-speed trial phase, but I am filled with confidence about its future prospects, and I hope the Dusk I hold will surprise me one day!
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
So I broke down the consensus mechanism of the Dusk network:
Why is "Sealed PoS" its core?
From what I understand, I found that it is actually different from most public chains; Dusk does not adopt the classic PoS, but a mechanism they call "Sealed-Bid Proof of Stake."
I spent two whole days studying its white paper, trying to understand the actual meaning of the word "sealed."
In simple terms, before each block is produced, potential block producers need to submit their bids (committing to lock a certain amount of tokens and time) in a cryptographic "black box," rather than broadcasting publicly.
Then, through an algorithm, the winner is secretly chosen.
Only the selected block producer needs to subsequently prove their qualification to the network.
I believe the goal of this design directly addresses two pain points:
One is to prevent large-scale staking pools from monopolizing block rights (because the pool cannot know in advance which participant should be put forward to compete); the second is to enhance the privacy of validator identities, reducing their risk of targeted attacks.
This completely fits Dusk's positioning in servicing institutional finance (such as Security Token Offerings, STOs).
Participants often wish to hide their strategies and position sizes.
However, from an engineering perspective, this mechanism is extremely complex and requires very high reliability in network latency and cryptographic components.
I attempted to run their testnet node and could feel the synchronization burden brought by this complexity.
Whether its advantages can be fully realized heavily depends on the scale of network adoption and the quality of participants.
If there are only a few nodes, privacy may actually decrease.
This is an engine designed for "future large-scale institutional applications"; currently, it is still in a medium to low-speed trial phase, but I am filled with confidence about its future prospects, and I hope the Dusk I hold will surprise me one day!
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
Let me analyze the token economics of VANRY: the inflation model and long-term supply curve!
When we talk about the price of VANRY, we cannot avoid its token economic model.
According to public information, VANRY has a predetermined inflation issuance plan, mainly used for staking rewards and ecological incentives.
To put it simply, this means that new VANRY will be minted every year and enter circulation.
The key here is 'balance'.
If the growth of the network (represented by transaction fee income and ecological value) can exceed the dilution effect brought by inflation, then the holders of VANRY are actually still in a net appreciation state.
Conversely, if ecological development is slow and purely relies on inflation to incentivize staking, it may create sustained pressure on the coin price.
In the long term, some public chains will have deflation mechanisms (such as fee destruction), but Vanar currently seems to focus more on absorbing new supply by expanding actual application demand.
Therefore, I believe that paying attention to the 'real output capacity' of its ecology is more important than simply focusing on the inflation rate numbers.
We need to observe whether the new VANRY is effectively converted into the productivity of the ecology.
$VANRY
#vanar
@Vanarchain
When we talk about the price of VANRY, we cannot avoid its token economic model.
According to public information, VANRY has a predetermined inflation issuance plan, mainly used for staking rewards and ecological incentives.
To put it simply, this means that new VANRY will be minted every year and enter circulation.
The key here is 'balance'.
If the growth of the network (represented by transaction fee income and ecological value) can exceed the dilution effect brought by inflation, then the holders of VANRY are actually still in a net appreciation state.
Conversely, if ecological development is slow and purely relies on inflation to incentivize staking, it may create sustained pressure on the coin price.
In the long term, some public chains will have deflation mechanisms (such as fee destruction), but Vanar currently seems to focus more on absorbing new supply by expanding actual application demand.
Therefore, I believe that paying attention to the 'real output capacity' of its ecology is more important than simply focusing on the inflation rate numbers.
We need to observe whether the new VANRY is effectively converted into the productivity of the ecology.
$VANRY
#vanar
@Vanarchain
Wow! The Reward Center has distributed rewards again!
It's really too happy!
I was still struggling with whether to order a late-night snack, and then Binance directly airdropped a barbecue to me, sending me over 500 $WAL
I didn't think much about it and directly converted it to US dollars, a total of 60 dollars, and this is the first reward, there will be more rewards later, so those who work hard are the luckiest!
Actually, I was initially optimistic about @Walrus 🦭/acc mainly for two reasons!
The first is that the Creator Center generously gave 300,000 tokens to reward outstanding creators, allowing everyone to earn a little income while writing, which deserves a thumbs up 👍
The second is that the core Red Stuff's two-dimensional coding algorithm #walrus is stunning, improving efficiency by 4.5 times after splitting and storing data, with storage costs as low as 1/500 of Arweave, thoroughly solving the high-cost pain point of decentralized storage.
Moreover, its hybrid right confirmation architecture makes RWA assets more credible on-chain, with 18 authoritative nodes cross-validating + official data interface synchronization, reducing the confirmation time from 15 days to 3 days, with an error rate close to zero. Combining PoS consensus mechanism and intelligent auditing engine, it ensures data security while adapting to global regulatory rules.
What’s more valuable is the deep integration with the Sui ecosystem, supporting programmable operations and dynamic data management, balancing performance, compliance, and flexibility. This is also the core reason why I am optimistic about WAL.
It's really too happy!
I was still struggling with whether to order a late-night snack, and then Binance directly airdropped a barbecue to me, sending me over 500 $WAL
I didn't think much about it and directly converted it to US dollars, a total of 60 dollars, and this is the first reward, there will be more rewards later, so those who work hard are the luckiest!
Actually, I was initially optimistic about @Walrus 🦭/acc mainly for two reasons!
The first is that the Creator Center generously gave 300,000 tokens to reward outstanding creators, allowing everyone to earn a little income while writing, which deserves a thumbs up 👍
The second is that the core Red Stuff's two-dimensional coding algorithm #walrus is stunning, improving efficiency by 4.5 times after splitting and storing data, with storage costs as low as 1/500 of Arweave, thoroughly solving the high-cost pain point of decentralized storage.
Moreover, its hybrid right confirmation architecture makes RWA assets more credible on-chain, with 18 authoritative nodes cross-validating + official data interface synchronization, reducing the confirmation time from 15 days to 3 days, with an error rate close to zero. Combining PoS consensus mechanism and intelligent auditing engine, it ensures data security while adapting to global regulatory rules.
What’s more valuable is the deep integration with the Sui ecosystem, supporting programmable operations and dynamic data management, balancing performance, compliance, and flexibility. This is also the core reason why I am optimistic about WAL.
Beginner's Pitfalls: Three Rookie Mistakes I Made
When I first started using ListaDAO for arbitrage, I made a few mistakes that now seem silly, so I'm sharing them to give you a heads-up.
First, hitting the collateral ratio red line. I always wanted to maximize capital efficiency, setting the collateral ratio just right. As a result, during a midnight market crash, before I could add more collateral, the system liquidated me, and the losses were far greater than the interest I earned. Now I set my collateral ratio well above the requirements for peace of mind.
Second, ignoring the duration of financial products. I was so focused on the low borrowing rates that I eagerly borrowed USD1 to deposit into a financial pool, only to later realize that it was a 90-day fixed lock-up. But my loan had a floating interest rate; if borrowing costs skyrocketed during that time, I would be in a bind. Now I always ensure that the durations and flexibility of both ends match.
Third, completely misunderstanding reserve funds. I collateralized all my assets and didn't leave any BNB (for gas fees) in my wallet. As a result, when I needed to adjust my position, I had no money to pay the network fees, which was very awkward. Now I always keep some BNB in my wallet as 'fuel'; that's a hard-learned lesson.
I hope you won't fall into these traps. On-chain operations, details determine success or failure, and safety is always the top priority.
#usd1理财最佳策略listadao $LISTA @lista_dao
When I first started using ListaDAO for arbitrage, I made a few mistakes that now seem silly, so I'm sharing them to give you a heads-up.
First, hitting the collateral ratio red line. I always wanted to maximize capital efficiency, setting the collateral ratio just right. As a result, during a midnight market crash, before I could add more collateral, the system liquidated me, and the losses were far greater than the interest I earned. Now I set my collateral ratio well above the requirements for peace of mind.
Second, ignoring the duration of financial products. I was so focused on the low borrowing rates that I eagerly borrowed USD1 to deposit into a financial pool, only to later realize that it was a 90-day fixed lock-up. But my loan had a floating interest rate; if borrowing costs skyrocketed during that time, I would be in a bind. Now I always ensure that the durations and flexibility of both ends match.
Third, completely misunderstanding reserve funds. I collateralized all my assets and didn't leave any BNB (for gas fees) in my wallet. As a result, when I needed to adjust my position, I had no money to pay the network fees, which was very awkward. Now I always keep some BNB in my wallet as 'fuel'; that's a hard-learned lesson.
I hope you won't fall into these traps. On-chain operations, details determine success or failure, and safety is always the top priority.
#usd1理财最佳策略listadao $LISTA @lista_dao
XPL: Finding a Way Out in the Compliance Framework
In the current environment of increasingly stringent global regulations, I pay special attention to the technical layout of the XPL project in terms of compliance— it has not passively responded to regulations but has actively embedded compliance requirements into the underlying protocol. This technical approach to compliance makes me feel it is very visionary.
First, from the perspective of compliance technology during the issuance phase, the project party has built a technical system of "multi-dimensional KYC + address risk control." When users participate in the XPL token subscription, they not only need to complete traditional identity verification but also need to verify the on-chain address tracing— the system will automatically query the historical transaction records of the user's wallet address and use Chainalysis's risk scoring model to determine whether the address is associated with high-risk areas or illegal transactions.
First, from the perspective of compliance technology during the issuance phase, the project party has built a technical system of "multi-dimensional KYC + address risk control." When users participate in the XPL token subscription, they not only need to complete traditional identity verification but also need to verify the on-chain address tracing— the system will automatically query the historical transaction records of the user's wallet address and use Chainalysis's risk scoring model to determine whether the address is associated with high-risk areas or illegal transactions.
Vanar Chain Paradigm Validation: The First Fusion Experiment of AI Native Economy and Player Sovereign Economy
I have spent nearly half a year continuously tracking and cross-validating the actual operational data, economic interaction patterns, and user behavior changes of early AI and gaming projects on the Vanar Chain. This process has gradually made me realize that the role played by Vanar Chain is far more than just a simple carrier platform for two popular tracks. It is quietly becoming an unprecedented 'social experiment arena,' with the core proposition: when the player economy, representing human creativity and social needs, coexists with the AI-native economy, representing automation and agents, in the same verifiable, decentralized environment, what new paradigms of production, distribution, and collaboration will emerge? The preliminary results of this experiment may redefine all our perceptions of the boundaries of value creation in Web3. This article will deduce the underlying logic of this integrated experiment, the emerging patterns, and its fundamental impact on the long-term ecological architecture based on observation.
ListaDAO Beginner's Practical Guide: A Complete Operational Path from Zero to One
For newcomers to ListaDAO, I would like to share a complete operational path that has been validated through practice. This path starts with the most basic preparations and progresses step by step, aimed at helping newcomers safely and systematically master the core functions of ListaDAO.
Phase One: Education and Preparation. Before touching any funds, I recommend spending at least a few hours understanding the basic concepts of ListaDAO: What is over-collateralized lending? What is liquid staking? How does the liquidation mechanism work? At the same time, prepare the necessary tools: a wallet that supports the BNB chain (such as MetaMask), a small amount of BNB for gas fees, and a small amount of funds for testing. I strongly advise against investing large amounts of money without understanding the basic mechanisms.
Phase One: Education and Preparation. Before touching any funds, I recommend spending at least a few hours understanding the basic concepts of ListaDAO: What is over-collateralized lending? What is liquid staking? How does the liquidation mechanism work? At the same time, prepare the necessary tools: a wallet that supports the BNB chain (such as MetaMask), a small amount of BNB for gas fees, and a small amount of funds for testing. I strongly advise against investing large amounts of money without understanding the basic mechanisms.
Behind Interest Rate Fluctuations: The Market Sentiment Signals I See
After using Lista Lending for a while, I've developed a habit: occasionally checking the real-time interest rates of several major liquidity pools. I've found that these are not just a few numbers, but more like a thermometer for market sentiment.
For example, a few days ago, when the market was generally in panic, the demand for borrowing the stablecoin USD1 surged (possibly because people wanted to switch to stablecoins for safety), and its borrowing rate skyrocketed from below 2% to over 8% in a short time. Conversely, when the market warms up and people want to borrow money to buy coins, the interest rate for borrowing BNB against ETH as collateral will rise.
So for me, Lista's interest rate dashboard has become a supplementary observation tool. If I see an unusually sharp increase in a certain interest rate, I instinctively check the news and look at the market to see if there’s some market event I haven’t noticed yet.
It can't tell me whether to buy or sell, but it can remind me: the market's funds are flowing in which direction. This micro-level perception sometimes feels more tangible than looking at candlestick charts.
#usd1理财最佳策略listadao $LISTA @lista_dao
After using Lista Lending for a while, I've developed a habit: occasionally checking the real-time interest rates of several major liquidity pools. I've found that these are not just a few numbers, but more like a thermometer for market sentiment.
For example, a few days ago, when the market was generally in panic, the demand for borrowing the stablecoin USD1 surged (possibly because people wanted to switch to stablecoins for safety), and its borrowing rate skyrocketed from below 2% to over 8% in a short time. Conversely, when the market warms up and people want to borrow money to buy coins, the interest rate for borrowing BNB against ETH as collateral will rise.
So for me, Lista's interest rate dashboard has become a supplementary observation tool. If I see an unusually sharp increase in a certain interest rate, I instinctively check the news and look at the market to see if there’s some market event I haven’t noticed yet.
It can't tell me whether to buy or sell, but it can remind me: the market's funds are flowing in which direction. This micro-level perception sometimes feels more tangible than looking at candlestick charts.
#usd1理财最佳策略listadao $LISTA @lista_dao
How long can this arbitrage model really last?\n\nIn the end, let's talk about reality. Is this arbitrage model that relies on "low interest rates from agreements" and "high interest rates from platforms" sustainable in the long term? I have my doubts.\n\nMy view is that it is more reliable to treat it as a temporary opportunity. In the early stages, ListaDAO attracted users with low interest rates, while exchanges like Binance pulled in new users with high-yield activities, resulting in a significant interest rate spread due to the subsidies from both sides. However, these subsidies cannot last forever. On one hand, as Lista's lending scale increases, market interest rates will tend to balance; on the other hand, the 20% annualized rate from exchanges is clearly a limited-time promotion.\n\nTherefore, my strategy is: not to treat it as a core, stable source of income, but rather as a "bonus" during the market dividend period. When there is a clear opportunity, participate decisively; when the interest rate spread narrows significantly or the activity ends, withdraw promptly.\n\nAt the same time, continue to learn deeper strategies within the Lista ecosystem, such as liquidity staking and stablecoin minting, as these may be more sustainable ways to participate. In short: seize the moment, but don't expect it to last forever.\n#usd1理财最佳策略listadao $LISTA @lista_dao
Analyzing the Dual-Token Model of ListaDAO: How slisBNB and lisUSD Drive the Ecological Flywheel
One of the most appealing designs of ListaDAO is its dual-token model composed of slisBNB and lisUSD. These two tokens do not exist in isolation but are intricately interwoven through a clever mechanism that drives the value circulation and growth flywheel of the entire ecosystem.
slisBNB serves as the value input and stable cornerstone. It is the entry point and foundational asset of the entire system. The process of converting BNB into slisBNB essentially brings the fundamental value asset of the BNB chain into the ListaDAO ecosystem. The dual nature of slisBNB—representing both staked BNB (value storage) and the ability to earn interest (generate returns)—makes it an ideal collateral. It injects 'high-quality capital' with inherent earning capacity into the system, which is more stable than static assets because holders are more motivated to participate long-term rather than frequently entering and exiting. The accumulation of slisBNB directly enhances the overall security margin and attractiveness of the protocol.
slisBNB serves as the value input and stable cornerstone. It is the entry point and foundational asset of the entire system. The process of converting BNB into slisBNB essentially brings the fundamental value asset of the BNB chain into the ListaDAO ecosystem. The dual nature of slisBNB—representing both staked BNB (value storage) and the ability to earn interest (generate returns)—makes it an ideal collateral. It injects 'high-quality capital' with inherent earning capacity into the system, which is more stable than static assets because holders are more motivated to participate long-term rather than frequently entering and exiting. The accumulation of slisBNB directly enhances the overall security margin and attractiveness of the protocol.
Analyzing Walrus's Validator Network Architecture: I believe it is constructing a 'TEE-based inter-chain security corridor'
After delving into Walrus's latest technical roadmap, especially the details of its validator node client upgrade, I have an increasingly strong feeling.
I believe that the current mainstream narrative of cross-chain security models, whether it is multi-signature or optimistic verification, is caught in a dilemma of compromising between 'trust costs' and 'degree of decentralization.'
Walrus has chosen a more hardcore and engineering-oriented path, which makes me feel that its goal is not merely to serve asset cross-chain.
In my opinion, it attempts to leverage hardware security technologies like trusted execution environments to build verifiable and highly private 'secure data channels' in a mutually distrustful multi-chain environment.
I believe that the current mainstream narrative of cross-chain security models, whether it is multi-signature or optimistic verification, is caught in a dilemma of compromising between 'trust costs' and 'degree of decentralization.'
Walrus has chosen a more hardcore and engineering-oriented path, which makes me feel that its goal is not merely to serve asset cross-chain.
In my opinion, it attempts to leverage hardware security technologies like trusted execution environments to build verifiable and highly private 'secure data channels' in a mutually distrustful multi-chain environment.
Dusk and NPEX: 300 million euros of RWA on-chain, a key leap for narrative into reality
I have been continuously observing the real-world asset track, and a strong feeling I have is:
The RWA field has been noisy for many years; what has always been truly scarce is not the concept of "mapping" assets on-chain, but —
After being on-chain, can assets circulate "trustworthily" in an environment that combines liquidity, compliance, and privacy?
Not "one-way casting", not "dead inventory storage", not "OTC matching", not "islands lacking regulatory endorsement".
Rather:
Can tokenized stocks, bonds, and funds be freely traded in a secondary market that is recognized by regulators, protects commercial secrets, and has deep liquidity?
The RWA field has been noisy for many years; what has always been truly scarce is not the concept of "mapping" assets on-chain, but —
After being on-chain, can assets circulate "trustworthily" in an environment that combines liquidity, compliance, and privacy?
Not "one-way casting", not "dead inventory storage", not "OTC matching", not "islands lacking regulatory endorsement".
Rather:
Can tokenized stocks, bonds, and funds be freely traded in a secondary market that is recognized by regulators, protects commercial secrets, and has deep liquidity?
From Initial Conception to BNB Chain Cornerstone: Tracing the Origin and Development Path of ListaDAO
When I first came into contact with ListaDAO, I just regarded it as a practical DeFi tool. But when I began to study its development context, I understood the evolution a protocol must go through from conception to becoming infrastructure. The origin of ListaDAO did not appear out of thin air; it is a response to a core need in the DeFi space – the efficient release of liquidity for staked assets. This need is particularly prominent on PoS chains like BNB, where a large number of assets are locked due to staking and cannot participate in richer financial activities. The founding team of ListaDAO keenly captured this pain point and drew on the mature models of predecessors like MakerDAO, deeply integrating it with the concept of liquid staking, ultimately creating this solution on the BNB chain.
Login to explore more contents