AH啊豪
Verified Creator
alpha空投猎手｜链上交互狂人｜一级市场投研狩猎金狗｜币圈项目太多了，秉承错过了就等下波机会，心态特别重要！
USD1 Holder
High-Frequency Trader
5 Years
336 Following
44.0K+ Followers
25.4K Liked
2.1K+ Shared
Posts
All
Quotes
Live
PINNED
The primary market Chinese MeMe is on fire again‼️
Just entered 2026, Chinese MeMe coins
"I'm here now" have made a large group of people rich overnight
"Binance Life" has also listed on spot trading
Directly baffling foreign friends!
So there are still many opportunities in the primary market now!
But many people still don't take seriously the high fees in the primary market, not knowing that spending just one minute can save hundreds or even thousands of dollars in profits💰
👇👇👇
Now fill in Ahao's wallet invitation to save 30% in fees (the highest proportion allowed within market compliance). Over 300 people have already signed up, and future upgrades will allow me to adjust the ratio in real time for brothers. It's automatically returned by the system, no need for my intervention, completely worry-free about the risk of being scammed‼️
1️⃣ Enter Web3 wallet
2️⃣ Click Invite Friends
3️⃣ Click Participate Now
4️⃣ Enter: AAA111
5️⃣ Confirm Complete✅
Brothers who are bound can come to the homepage to join the group,
And sound the call to launch together on great projects!
#币安上线币安人生 $我踏马来了
Just entered 2026, Chinese MeMe coins
"I'm here now" have made a large group of people rich overnight
"Binance Life" has also listed on spot trading
Directly baffling foreign friends!
So there are still many opportunities in the primary market now!
But many people still don't take seriously the high fees in the primary market, not knowing that spending just one minute can save hundreds or even thousands of dollars in profits💰
👇👇👇
Now fill in Ahao's wallet invitation to save 30% in fees (the highest proportion allowed within market compliance). Over 300 people have already signed up, and future upgrades will allow me to adjust the ratio in real time for brothers. It's automatically returned by the system, no need for my intervention, completely worry-free about the risk of being scammed‼️
1️⃣ Enter Web3 wallet
2️⃣ Click Invite Friends
3️⃣ Click Participate Now
4️⃣ Enter: AAA111
5️⃣ Confirm Complete✅
Brothers who are bound can come to the homepage to join the group,
And sound the call to launch together on great projects!
#币安上线币安人生 $我踏马来了
Calmly Viewing High Returns: A Comprehensive Analysis of Risks in the Lista DAO Arbitrage Strategy
By the time you read this far, you may have been attracted by the annual returns of 15%, 20%, or even higher mentioned in the Lista DAO strategy. However, in the crypto world, high returns always come with high risks. As a responsible sharer, I must spend an entire article to seriously and honestly discuss the risks you must face behind these strategies. Remember, before seeing returns, first understand the risks.
1. Market risk: The most direct killer - liquidation
This is the most core and dangerous risk among all collateral lending strategies.
· What it is: When the price of the BTC or ETH you have collateralized drops significantly, the total value of your collateral approaches or even falls below the value of your loan. Once it reaches the protocol's 'liquidation line', the system will forcefully auction your collateral to repay the debt.
1. Market risk: The most direct killer - liquidation
This is the most core and dangerous risk among all collateral lending strategies.
· What it is: When the price of the BTC or ETH you have collateralized drops significantly, the total value of your collateral approaches or even falls below the value of your loan. Once it reaches the protocol's 'liquidation line', the system will forcefully auction your collateral to repay the debt.
XPL: Redefining Tracks and Competitive Logic
When studying the competitive strategy of Plasma, I found that its smartest move was not to directly challenge Ethereum, Solana, and other general-purpose public chains, but rather to redefine a niche track through technological innovation—focusing on the infrastructure for stablecoin payments and small, high-frequency trading. This 'differentiated competition' technological logic has allowed it to find its place in a fiercely competitive market.
To understand Plasma's core technological advantages, one must first clarify the technical differences between it and mainstream solutions like Rollup. Rollup, as a scaling solution for Ethereum, operates on the core logic of 'off-chain computation + on-chain data availability,' which requires all transaction data to be compressed and uploaded to the Ethereum mainnet. This leads to an inevitable lower limit on Rollup's transaction costs—no matter how low the Gas fees on the Ethereum mainnet are, there will always be data storage fees to pay.
To understand Plasma's core technological advantages, one must first clarify the technical differences between it and mainstream solutions like Rollup. Rollup, as a scaling solution for Ethereum, operates on the core logic of 'off-chain computation + on-chain data availability,' which requires all transaction data to be compressed and uploaded to the Ethereum mainnet. This leads to an inevitable lower limit on Rollup's transaction costs—no matter how low the Gas fees on the Ethereum mainnet are, there will always be data storage fees to pay.
The 'Stability Pool' in Lista DAO: Opportunities and Safety Shields in Crisis
When discussing Lista DAO, there is a very critical component that is often overlooked by ordinary users: the stability pool. It not only serves as the 'ballast' to maintain the stability of the protocol but also provides users seeking higher risk-adjusted returns with a unique opportunity. Today, we will unveil its mystery.
What is the stability pool? Why do we need it?
Imagine that when the market crashes and the value of collateral for many borrowers approaches the liquidation threshold, the system needs to immediately sell these collaterals to repay debts, ensuring that the protocol does not incur bad debts. Who will buy these liquidated assets? How can we ensure that sales are quick and orderly? This is the core function of the stability pool.
What is the stability pool? Why do we need it?
Imagine that when the market crashes and the value of collateral for many borrowers approaches the liquidation threshold, the system needs to immediately sell these collaterals to repay debts, ensuring that the protocol does not incur bad debts. Who will buy these liquidated assets? How can we ensure that sales are quick and orderly? This is the core function of the stability pool.
Beyond Collateralized Lending: Exploring the Future of Unsecured Loans and RWA in Lista DAO
The Lista DAO we are currently discussing is built on the foundation of "over-collateralization." But the evolution of DeFi never stops. According to its vision, Lista is exploring more cutting-edge areas: the introduction of unsecured loans and real-world assets (RWA). This is not just an addition of functionality but a restructuring of the entire protocol narrative and valuation logic. Let's look forward to this future together.
Unsecured Loans: A DeFi Experiment in the Credit World
"Unsecured Loans" are the norm in traditional finance, but they are exceptionally difficult in the anonymous DeFi world. How does Lista DAO plan to crack this problem?
Unsecured Loans: A DeFi Experiment in the Credit World
"Unsecured Loans" are the norm in traditional finance, but they are exceptionally difficult in the anonymous DeFi world. How does Lista DAO plan to crack this problem?
Let me tell you how smart it is for DUSK to take the compliance route.
In the past, I really thought discussing 'compliance' in the crypto world was just asking for trouble?
Leaving the wild-growing dividends untouched and instead putting a tight shackle on oneself is purely a sign of a muddled mind.
But after closely examining DUSK's recent trend, I realized belatedly: this isn't about shackling oneself; it's clearly the most ruthless and clever move, directly hitting the Achilles' heel of traditional large funds.
The crypto world lacks speculation, but large funds, especially institutional funds, have never dared to easily enter the market.
Why?
Afraid of crossing regulatory red lines, afraid of commercial secrets being leaked!
They want the efficient circulation of blockchain while also adhering to compliance and privacy standards; these two demands were previously impossible to balance in the crypto world.
Leaving the wild-growing dividends untouched and instead putting a tight shackle on oneself is purely a sign of a muddled mind.
But after closely examining DUSK's recent trend, I realized belatedly: this isn't about shackling oneself; it's clearly the most ruthless and clever move, directly hitting the Achilles' heel of traditional large funds.
The crypto world lacks speculation, but large funds, especially institutional funds, have never dared to easily enter the market.
Why?
Afraid of crossing regulatory red lines, afraid of commercial secrets being leaked!
They want the efficient circulation of blockchain while also adhering to compliance and privacy standards; these two demands were previously impossible to balance in the crypto world.
From NFT to Edge Computing: The Ecological Expansion Landscape of Walrus
After discussing Walrus's technical planning and AI collaboration, let's take a look at its ecological layout—over the past six months, Walrus has made numerous collaborations that seem diverse, including NFTs, edge computing, and identity protocols. However, when pieced together, these collaborations reveal its ambition: not just to be a 'better decentralized cloud storage,' but to become the 'universal data layer' of the next generation of the internet, serving all applications that require high performance and high reliability data services.
And WAL, along with the expansion of the ecosystem, has transformed from a simple 'storage token' into a 'infrastructure passport' that supports multiple tracks.
And WAL, along with the expansion of the ecosystem, has transformed from a simple 'storage token' into a 'infrastructure passport' that supports multiple tracks.
As a user, I personally experienced a "gas fee fluctuation" event on the WAL chain.
That afternoon, I was conducting a routine liquidity addition operation on a DEX on the WAL chain. The page showed an estimated gas fee of 0.5 WAL, which I thought was acceptable, so I confirmed it. However, the transaction was stuck on "waiting" for almost 5 minutes. I refreshed the page and resubmitted, and at that moment, the estimated fee jumped to 1.8 WAL. I was a bit confused, so I checked the block explorer and found that during those few minutes, the network had suddenly been filled up by a large batch of minting transactions from an NFT project.
This led me to start studying the gas fee mechanism of WAL. It currently adopts a bidding model similar to Ethereum, but lacks the base fee burning mechanism like EIP-1559. This means that during congestion, fees are entirely determined by the market and are all collected by validators. More critically, since the native token of the WAL chain is WAL itself, and the price of WAL is inherently volatile, users bear a "double volatility risk": they have to worry about the level of network congestion as well as the price of WAL.
In the community, there have actually been proposals discussing the introduction of fixed fee units (such as pegging gas fees to a stable value unit) and a fee burning mechanism. However, the implementation has been slow, and some node operators are clearly satisfied with the current model of obtaining all transaction fees. As an ordinary user, my direct feeling is that this fee mechanism is not very user-friendly for low-volume users who engage in high-frequency interactions, as it may inadvertently raise the usage threshold. If the team wants to attract a broader range of regular applications, a more stable and predictable cost structure must be considered.
#walrus $WAL @WalrusProtocol
That afternoon, I was conducting a routine liquidity addition operation on a DEX on the WAL chain. The page showed an estimated gas fee of 0.5 WAL, which I thought was acceptable, so I confirmed it. However, the transaction was stuck on "waiting" for almost 5 minutes. I refreshed the page and resubmitted, and at that moment, the estimated fee jumped to 1.8 WAL. I was a bit confused, so I checked the block explorer and found that during those few minutes, the network had suddenly been filled up by a large batch of minting transactions from an NFT project.
This led me to start studying the gas fee mechanism of WAL. It currently adopts a bidding model similar to Ethereum, but lacks the base fee burning mechanism like EIP-1559. This means that during congestion, fees are entirely determined by the market and are all collected by validators. More critically, since the native token of the WAL chain is WAL itself, and the price of WAL is inherently volatile, users bear a "double volatility risk": they have to worry about the level of network congestion as well as the price of WAL.
In the community, there have actually been proposals discussing the introduction of fixed fee units (such as pegging gas fees to a stable value unit) and a fee burning mechanism. However, the implementation has been slow, and some node operators are clearly satisfied with the current model of obtaining all transaction fees. As an ordinary user, my direct feeling is that this fee mechanism is not very user-friendly for low-volume users who engage in high-frequency interactions, as it may inadvertently raise the usage threshold. If the team wants to attract a broader range of regular applications, a more stable and predictable cost structure must be considered.
#walrus $WAL @WalrusProtocol
From my actual experience with Vanar development: The consumption scenarios of VANRY are more than expected!
Recently, I briefly ran Vanar's testnet to see from a developer's perspective how practical the consumption scenarios of VANRY really are.
I found that, in addition to the most basic gas fees, some of its designs are indeed guiding deeper token usage.
For example, the native on-chain AI service calls clearly require payment in VANRY. If an application wants to use the on-chain storage of a 3D model library or dynamic rendering services, it may also involve additional VANRY costs.
From a technical perspective, this design of serviceizing core functionalities allows the value capture of VANRY to be more direct. This is different from purely relying on transaction congestion to drive up gas fees, but rather creates demand by providing valuable on-chain services. However, the premise of all this is that these services (such as AI inference, 3D rendering) can really be more competitive in cost and quality than traditional centralized service providers.
If developers and users feel it is not cost-effective, this closed loop cannot operate.
Therefore, I feel that the value foundation of VANRY largely depends on whether the Vanar team can make these technical facilities both user-friendly and economical.
$VANRY
#vanar
@Vanar
Recently, I briefly ran Vanar's testnet to see from a developer's perspective how practical the consumption scenarios of VANRY really are.
I found that, in addition to the most basic gas fees, some of its designs are indeed guiding deeper token usage.
For example, the native on-chain AI service calls clearly require payment in VANRY. If an application wants to use the on-chain storage of a 3D model library or dynamic rendering services, it may also involve additional VANRY costs.
From a technical perspective, this design of serviceizing core functionalities allows the value capture of VANRY to be more direct. This is different from purely relying on transaction congestion to drive up gas fees, but rather creates demand by providing valuable on-chain services. However, the premise of all this is that these services (such as AI inference, 3D rendering) can really be more competitive in cost and quality than traditional centralized service providers.
If developers and users feel it is not cost-effective, this closed loop cannot operate.
Therefore, I feel that the value foundation of VANRY largely depends on whether the Vanar team can make these technical facilities both user-friendly and economical.
$VANRY
#vanar
@Vanar
8.7 million IDOL Token Destruction Achieved! MEET48 Trading Data Explodes, AI + Web3 Transforms Fans into Ecosystem Beneficiaries
As a deeply engaged fan and investor in the MEET48 ecosystem, I witnessed the thrilling excitement of the second 'MEET48 Best7' voting event, and the announcement of the destruction of 8.7 million IDOL tokens at the end of this event made me truly feel the core value of the 'AI + Web3' model, where fans transform from entertainment consumers to ecosystem builders and beneficiaries. In the current volatile cryptocurrency market, such a performance backed by solid trading data and deflationary actions is far more convincing than hollow conceptual promotions.
The core data from this destruction event is astonishing: during the event, the transaction volume (TXN) of the MEET48 dApp soared to 619,000 times, and the number of active addresses (UAW) broke through 356,000. This set of data not only confirms the high enthusiasm of the fanbase but also allows MEET48 to strongly win the first place in 24-hour full-chain UAW and the first place in BSC ecosystem UAW within 7 days among social dApps. For me, behind this string of numbers is the real trajectory of countless fans voting, interacting, and trading with IDOL tokens—I myself have consumed nearly a thousand IDOL to support my idol, and participants like me are among the 235,000 token holders worldwide. More importantly, the project party will destroy 30% of the total voting revenue of 29 million IDOL (about 8.7 million), and this portion of tokens accounts for 0.181% of the total supply of IDOL. Although this percentage seems small, it releases a strong value signal in the cryptocurrency market.
The core data from this destruction event is astonishing: during the event, the transaction volume (TXN) of the MEET48 dApp soared to 619,000 times, and the number of active addresses (UAW) broke through 356,000. This set of data not only confirms the high enthusiasm of the fanbase but also allows MEET48 to strongly win the first place in 24-hour full-chain UAW and the first place in BSC ecosystem UAW within 7 days among social dApps. For me, behind this string of numbers is the real trajectory of countless fans voting, interacting, and trading with IDOL tokens—I myself have consumed nearly a thousand IDOL to support my idol, and participants like me are among the 235,000 token holders worldwide. More importantly, the project party will destroy 30% of the total voting revenue of 29 million IDOL (about 8.7 million), and this portion of tokens accounts for 0.181% of the total supply of IDOL. Although this percentage seems small, it releases a strong value signal in the cryptocurrency market.
Why is Dusk referred to as the most conscientious project by KOLs in the square? What is the secret behind DUSK's explosive rise?
It is said that price increases are mere speculation, but as a long-time observer, I found that the core of this surge, which reached $DUSK , is actually its seemingly low-key technological upgrade at the beginning of the year, the launch of the DuskEVM mainnet.
I tell you, this is like putting a 'rocket engine' on the ecosystem.
In the past, developers had to learn a whole new set of skills to build here, which had a very high threshold.
What does full compatibility with Ethereum's EVM mean?
It means that the vast number of mature applications and the army of developers on Ethereum can be almost costlessly migrated over.
With the threshold for development reduced to zero, the ecosystem can take off.
What I see is that as applications increase, users and transaction volumes will follow.
And everything done on this network, whether it's issuing a private placement bond or completing a privacy settlement, has to burn @Dusk as fuel.
This creates a continuously sustained consumption scenario for DUSK based on real demand.
Especially with the DuskTrade they are doing with the Dutch exchange, there are really hundreds of millions of euros worth of assets queued to go on-chain.
Just think, what will the consumption scale be when these physical assets start circulating at high frequency, like #dusk ?
So, this technological upgrade has transformed DUSK from 'fuel' into 'premium gasoline' that will be frantically sought after by massive engines.
The value logic has completely changed.
What is even more precious is that it actually issued rewards for creator tasks in advance, with those getting more receiving around $1600, and even the least getting $800. No wonder it has been so sought after, raising the coin price and rewarding creators can be said to be very conscientious!
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
It is said that price increases are mere speculation, but as a long-time observer, I found that the core of this surge, which reached $DUSK , is actually its seemingly low-key technological upgrade at the beginning of the year, the launch of the DuskEVM mainnet.
I tell you, this is like putting a 'rocket engine' on the ecosystem.
In the past, developers had to learn a whole new set of skills to build here, which had a very high threshold.
What does full compatibility with Ethereum's EVM mean?
It means that the vast number of mature applications and the army of developers on Ethereum can be almost costlessly migrated over.
With the threshold for development reduced to zero, the ecosystem can take off.
What I see is that as applications increase, users and transaction volumes will follow.
And everything done on this network, whether it's issuing a private placement bond or completing a privacy settlement, has to burn @Dusk as fuel.
This creates a continuously sustained consumption scenario for DUSK based on real demand.
Especially with the DuskTrade they are doing with the Dutch exchange, there are really hundreds of millions of euros worth of assets queued to go on-chain.
Just think, what will the consumption scale be when these physical assets start circulating at high frequency, like #dusk ?
So, this technological upgrade has transformed DUSK from 'fuel' into 'premium gasoline' that will be frantically sought after by massive engines.
The value logic has completely changed.
What is even more precious is that it actually issued rewards for creator tasks in advance, with those getting more receiving around $1600, and even the least getting $800. No wonder it has been so sought after, raising the coin price and rewarding creators can be said to be very conscientious!
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
Recently I've been quite idle, so I specifically tested the XPL network's testing environment for a cross-chain exchange to see if their claims of "optimal routing" are reliable.
The operation is very simple; it's just converting a small amount of ETH from the Ethereum testnet into AVAX on the Avalanche testnet through their aggregator. The interface is quite clean, and you can initiate it with a single click without any hassle.
However, I was a bit surprised by the backend routing—I found that my transaction was split into three steps: first, exchanging ETH for XPL's bridging assets on Ethereum, then going through their dedicated cross-chain channel for transmission, and finally converting to AVAX on Avalanche.
The entire process took about 4 minutes, which is almost twice as slow as the mainstream cross-chain bridges I usually use. To be honest, my patience was running thin.
But the advantages are also quite obvious: the final amount of AVAX received was about 2.3% more than if I had directly exchanged the equivalent value of ETH on the target chain's DEX.
Now I understand the core logic of XPL—it doesn't pursue absolute speed; instead, it relies on algorithms to real-time scrape the best prices across multiple chains and DEXs.
In simple terms, it trades time for profit, which is indeed appealing for large and non-urgent transactions.
However, it also has noticeable shortcomings: its efficiency entirely depends on the data update speed of the "liquidity oracle" and the congestion situation of various chains.
During my testing, I encountered a situation where a chain suddenly got congested, resulting in the transaction price of one step becoming invalid, requiring the entire routing to be recalculated, causing unnecessary waiting time.
Therefore, whether XPL can succeed really depends on whether its routing algorithm is intelligent enough and whether the connected liquidity depth is sufficient.
#plasma $XPL @Plasma
The operation is very simple; it's just converting a small amount of ETH from the Ethereum testnet into AVAX on the Avalanche testnet through their aggregator. The interface is quite clean, and you can initiate it with a single click without any hassle.
However, I was a bit surprised by the backend routing—I found that my transaction was split into three steps: first, exchanging ETH for XPL's bridging assets on Ethereum, then going through their dedicated cross-chain channel for transmission, and finally converting to AVAX on Avalanche.
The entire process took about 4 minutes, which is almost twice as slow as the mainstream cross-chain bridges I usually use. To be honest, my patience was running thin.
But the advantages are also quite obvious: the final amount of AVAX received was about 2.3% more than if I had directly exchanged the equivalent value of ETH on the target chain's DEX.
Now I understand the core logic of XPL—it doesn't pursue absolute speed; instead, it relies on algorithms to real-time scrape the best prices across multiple chains and DEXs.
In simple terms, it trades time for profit, which is indeed appealing for large and non-urgent transactions.
However, it also has noticeable shortcomings: its efficiency entirely depends on the data update speed of the "liquidity oracle" and the congestion situation of various chains.
During my testing, I encountered a situation where a chain suddenly got congested, resulting in the transaction price of one step becoming invalid, requiring the entire routing to be recalculated, causing unnecessary waiting time.
Therefore, whether XPL can succeed really depends on whether its routing algorithm is intelligent enough and whether the connected liquidity depth is sufficient.
#plasma $XPL @Plasma
I carefully looked at the use cases of Walrus's tokens and found that WAL is not just a simple transaction fee token.
I have been studying the token economic models of various projects.
Many projects have very specific uses for their tokens.
It's just to pay transaction fees.
And then, that's it.
But when I recently reviewed all the documents of Walrus, including technical specifications and governance pages, thoroughly.
I found that the use cases for WAL are designed very deeply and are interconnected.
I believe that understanding the true use of WAL is key to understanding the value of this project.
Today, I will use the most direct words to talk about where WAL is actually used.
First, the most basic use is to pay the transaction fees on cross-chain networks.
Many projects have very specific uses for their tokens.
It's just to pay transaction fees.
And then, that's it.
But when I recently reviewed all the documents of Walrus, including technical specifications and governance pages, thoroughly.
I found that the use cases for WAL are designed very deeply and are interconnected.
I believe that understanding the true use of WAL is key to understanding the value of this project.
Today, I will use the most direct words to talk about where WAL is actually used.
First, the most basic use is to pay the transaction fees on cross-chain networks.
How is the VANRY token used?
I have been watching everyone discuss the Vanar Chain, and I have seen many people talk about its token VANRY. I have noticed a common issue, which is that many people, even if they buy VANRY, are actually not very clear about how it is used in this huge ecosystem.
People tend to see tokens as something to speculate on, buying when it goes up and selling when it goes down. But for VANRY, if you only look at it this way, you might miss its core value. Its value is rooted in the daily operations of the Vanar Chain ecosystem.
Today, I want to set aside those complex concepts and just talk plainly about the scenarios in this ecosystem where an ordinary user, a gamer, or a project party absolutely needs to use VANRY. Understanding these will help you see where the demand for VANRY comes from.
People tend to see tokens as something to speculate on, buying when it goes up and selling when it goes down. But for VANRY, if you only look at it this way, you might miss its core value. Its value is rooted in the daily operations of the Vanar Chain ecosystem.
Today, I want to set aside those complex concepts and just talk plainly about the scenarios in this ecosystem where an ordinary user, a gamer, or a project party absolutely needs to use VANRY. Understanding these will help you see where the demand for VANRY comes from.
Dusk Network 2026: When privacy is no longer a means of evading regulation, but a cornerstone of compliance
I have recently been repeatedly examining the blockchain, especially the dilemmas in the financial application track, and the clearer I see one thing:
What this industry has truly been lacking is never higher TPS, nor fancier DeFi Lego, but —
How can institutional capital comfortably and on a large scale be 'permanently stationed' on the chain?
It is not 'pilot testing', not 'proof of concept', not 'small-scale trials', not 'short-term speculation'.
But:
How can trillion-level assets from the traditional world achieve real privacy circulation, compliant settlement, and seamless auditing on the blockchain?
What this industry has truly been lacking is never higher TPS, nor fancier DeFi Lego, but —
How can institutional capital comfortably and on a large scale be 'permanently stationed' on the chain?
It is not 'pilot testing', not 'proof of concept', not 'small-scale trials', not 'short-term speculation'.
But:
How can trillion-level assets from the traditional world achieve real privacy circulation, compliant settlement, and seamless auditing on the blockchain?
Practical Details: No One Will Tell You About Slippage and Gas Fees
Having watched a lot of tutorials calculating attractive theoretical arbitrage, you'll find two frustrating issues once you start operating: slippage and gas fees. These two can seriously eat into your profits.
For example, if you want to immediately exchange the borrowed USD1 for other assets to mine, when making a large exchange on a decentralized exchange (DEX), if the liquidity pool isn't deep enough, slippage will occur. It might show as 1 dollar to exchange for 1 coin, but the actual transaction turns out to be 0.995 coins. This 0.5% seems small, but over time it adds up painfully. My clumsy solution is: try to break it into smaller orders, operate in time slots, or choose the trading pairs with the best depth.
Even more tedious are gas fees. From collateral, borrowing, cross-chain transfers (if you need to move assets to different chains) to finally depositing in wealth management, each step burns gas. Although BNB Chain is cheap, if the operation chain is long, especially when the network is busy, it can accumulate to a significant amount. Once I calculated, and found that nearly 30% of my profits were eaten up by gas fees, a painful lesson. So now, I only operate when the arbitrage is large enough and the planned holding period is longer, and I never engage in frequent trading for small profits.
#usd1理财最佳策略listadao $LISTA @lista_dao
Having watched a lot of tutorials calculating attractive theoretical arbitrage, you'll find two frustrating issues once you start operating: slippage and gas fees. These two can seriously eat into your profits.
For example, if you want to immediately exchange the borrowed USD1 for other assets to mine, when making a large exchange on a decentralized exchange (DEX), if the liquidity pool isn't deep enough, slippage will occur. It might show as 1 dollar to exchange for 1 coin, but the actual transaction turns out to be 0.995 coins. This 0.5% seems small, but over time it adds up painfully. My clumsy solution is: try to break it into smaller orders, operate in time slots, or choose the trading pairs with the best depth.
Even more tedious are gas fees. From collateral, borrowing, cross-chain transfers (if you need to move assets to different chains) to finally depositing in wealth management, each step burns gas. Although BNB Chain is cheap, if the operation chain is long, especially when the network is busy, it can accumulate to a significant amount. Once I calculated, and found that nearly 30% of my profits were eaten up by gas fees, a painful lesson. So now, I only operate when the arbitrage is large enough and the planned holding period is longer, and I never engage in frequent trading for small profits.
#usd1理财最佳策略listadao $LISTA @lista_dao
Data-Driven Decision Making: How I Optimize the Use of ListaDAO by Monitoring Key Metrics
During the use of ListaDAO, I gradually shifted from intuitive operations to a data-driven decision-making approach. By continuously tracking and analyzing several core metrics, I can not only manage my positions more safely but also optimize returns at the right time.
The first category of metrics I focus on is the protocol health data. This includes the trend of total locked value changes, the distribution ratio of various collateral types, and the total circulation of lisUSD. A stable growth in TVL usually indicates an increase in protocol attractiveness, while diversification in collateral distribution can reduce systemic risk. I pay special attention to the proportion of slisBNB in the total collateral - as a native asset, an excessively high or low proportion may indicate different issues.
The first category of metrics I focus on is the protocol health data. This includes the trend of total locked value changes, the distribution ratio of various collateral types, and the total circulation of lisUSD. A stable growth in TVL usually indicates an increase in protocol attractiveness, while diversification in collateral distribution can reduce systemic risk. I pay special attention to the proportion of slisBNB in the total collateral - as a native asset, an excessively high or low proportion may indicate different issues.
The Future Development of ListaDAO: Long-term Value from Protocol Evolution and Community Governance
After long-term use and participation in the governance of ListaDAO, I began to think about the future development direction of this protocol and how these developments will affect its long-term value. From the protocol's technical roadmap, governance proposals, and community discussions, I can see several clear trends.
The possibility of multi-chain expansion is currently a hot topic in community discussions. Although ListaDAO is deeply rooted in the BNB chain, it may replicate its core liquid staking lending model to other PoS chains with similar demands through cross-chain technology or native multi-chain deployment in the future. This would significantly expand the protocol's potential market but would also bring challenges in cross-chain security and governance complexity. I am closely monitoring the relevant technical solutions and community votes, as this could determine whether ListaDAO remains as an exclusive infrastructure for the BNB chain or grows into a cross-chain universal protocol.
The possibility of multi-chain expansion is currently a hot topic in community discussions. Although ListaDAO is deeply rooted in the BNB chain, it may replicate its core liquid staking lending model to other PoS chains with similar demands through cross-chain technology or native multi-chain deployment in the future. This would significantly expand the protocol's potential market but would also bring challenges in cross-chain security and governance complexity. I am closely monitoring the relevant technical solutions and community votes, as this could determine whether ListaDAO remains as an exclusive infrastructure for the BNB chain or grows into a cross-chain universal protocol.
Plasma XPL: The Ultimate Liquidity Protocol - Coordinating the Value Gravity of a Fragmented World
The world of encryption is falling into a self-created paradox: to expand and achieve autonomy, we have created countless chains and Rollups; yet each new chain further splits the already scarce liquidity, forming isolated "liquidity ponds." Users and funds are trapped between islands, while cross-chain bridges have become fragile and dangerous single points of failure. The industry's current "multi-chain" or "L2 era" is essentially a highly fragmented liquidity apocalypse.
The solution is not to return to the old path of one chain ruling them all, but to require a brand new layer of abstraction: a "super protocol" that does not directly carry assets but can efficiently coordinate, guide, and integrate all fragmented liquidity. I believe that Plasma XPL and its network, with its core positioning and design, have the potential to evolve into a key component of this ultimate liquidity protocol, or even its core coordinating layer.
The solution is not to return to the old path of one chain ruling them all, but to require a brand new layer of abstraction: a "super protocol" that does not directly carry assets but can efficiently coordinate, guide, and integrate all fragmented liquidity. I believe that Plasma XPL and its network, with its core positioning and design, have the potential to evolve into a key component of this ultimate liquidity protocol, or even its core coordinating layer.
Wow, I've been stuck for half a day waiting for the transfer to arrive!
What should I do? Who can help me?
Until later when a friend recommended the public chain $XPL , I was completely impressed after using it just once. It's simply a "money-saving accelerator" for stablecoin transfers! Today, I must share this with everyone!
First of all, as a Layer 1 public chain focused on stablecoins, what surprised me the most about XPL is the zero transaction fee for USDT transfers!
Whether it's for giving employees a little salary or paying back a big shot some money last time, I didn't spend a single cent on Gas fees from start to finish.
Later, I learned that this is a special subsidy from the protocol layer, making stablecoins truly as easy to use as cash.
What's even more amazing is the speed; when I used it for the first time, I specifically counted the seconds, and the transaction confirmation only took sub-second level. It arrived instantly, without worrying about getting stuck halfway. (I was really scared of being stuck)
The main thing is that it's very friendly to us ordinary users. You can transfer directly without having to buy native tokens in advance. The operation is no different from other chains I usually use, and it's easy to get started.
I even paid special attention to the data; after XPL's mainnet launch, the stablecoin supply quickly surged from 5 billion to 7 billion, becoming one of the fastest-growing public chains in the industry.
After using it for a while, whether for small payments or large transfers, I haven't dropped a chain. I sincerely believe that being easy to use is the hard truth!
#plasma
@Plasma
What should I do? Who can help me?
Until later when a friend recommended the public chain $XPL , I was completely impressed after using it just once. It's simply a "money-saving accelerator" for stablecoin transfers! Today, I must share this with everyone!
First of all, as a Layer 1 public chain focused on stablecoins, what surprised me the most about XPL is the zero transaction fee for USDT transfers!
Whether it's for giving employees a little salary or paying back a big shot some money last time, I didn't spend a single cent on Gas fees from start to finish.
Later, I learned that this is a special subsidy from the protocol layer, making stablecoins truly as easy to use as cash.
What's even more amazing is the speed; when I used it for the first time, I specifically counted the seconds, and the transaction confirmation only took sub-second level. It arrived instantly, without worrying about getting stuck halfway. (I was really scared of being stuck)
The main thing is that it's very friendly to us ordinary users. You can transfer directly without having to buy native tokens in advance. The operation is no different from other chains I usually use, and it's easy to get started.
I even paid special attention to the data; after XPL's mainnet launch, the stablecoin supply quickly surged from 5 billion to 7 billion, becoming one of the fastest-growing public chains in the industry.
After using it for a while, whether for small payments or large transfers, I haven't dropped a chain. I sincerely believe that being easy to use is the hard truth!
#plasma
@Plasma
Login to explore more contents