Binance Square

Bitroot信仰

image
Verified Creator
bitroot:生态定位 BTC生态原生并行公链,兼容BTC架构,支持资产跨链/代币化,切入DeFi、NFT赛道
Open Trade
USTC Holder
USTC Holder
Frequent Trader
4.9 Years
2.0K+ Following
42.1K+ Followers
36.5K+ Liked
5.3K+ Shared
Content
Portfolio
PINNED
--
Bullish
See original
🧧🧧Bitroot fan red envelope explosion! Hurry to share Comment with 【9】 + follow to directly unlock the red envelope Be quick, once it's gone, it's gone, and more Bitroot content + exclusive benefits #加密市场观察
🧧🧧Bitroot fan red envelope explosion! Hurry to share
Comment with 【9】 + follow to directly unlock the red envelope
Be quick, once it's gone, it's gone, and more Bitroot content + exclusive benefits #加密市场观察
--
Bullish
See original
🎯 Solana vs Bitroot Core Comparison Summary 🔹 Performance - Solana: Theoretical TPS is very high, but the actual performance on the mainnet fluctuates greatly, relying on Firedancer optimization to approach 100,000 TPS; confirmation speed is fast, but historical outages are frequent. ​ - Bitroot: Testnet TPS has stabilized at 25,600–50,000, with peak pressure testing breaking 100,000, performance is more solid; confirmation time is slightly longer, but stability is better. 🔹 Technology and Development - Solana: Developed in Rust, not compatible with EVM, high migration costs for developers; cross-chain relies on third-party bridges. ​ - Bitroot: EVM compatible, supports zero-cost migration with Solidity, reuses Ethereum toolchain; native cross-chain + zero-knowledge proof, security is more guaranteed. 🔹 Ecosystem and Risks - Solana: The ecosystem is mature, TVL exceeds 12 billion USD, but is classified as a “security” by the SEC, regulatory risk is extremely high; node hardware threshold is high, insufficient decentralization. ​ - Bitroot: In the early testnet stage, the ecosystem is still growing, but the node threshold is low, with great potential for decentralization; security needs long-term validation, but there is no regulatory risk. 🔹 Cost Advantage - Solana: Transaction fee is about 0.0001 USD, which is already low. ​ - Bitroot: Transaction fee is as low as 1/20 of traditional public chains, with more prominent cost advantages. #加密市场观察
🎯 Solana vs Bitroot Core Comparison Summary

🔹 Performance

- Solana: Theoretical TPS is very high, but the actual performance on the mainnet fluctuates greatly, relying on Firedancer optimization to approach 100,000 TPS; confirmation speed is fast, but historical outages are frequent.

- Bitroot: Testnet TPS has stabilized at 25,600–50,000, with peak pressure testing breaking 100,000, performance is more solid; confirmation time is slightly longer, but stability is better.

🔹 Technology and Development

- Solana: Developed in Rust, not compatible with EVM, high migration costs for developers; cross-chain relies on third-party bridges.

- Bitroot: EVM compatible, supports zero-cost migration with Solidity, reuses Ethereum toolchain; native cross-chain + zero-knowledge proof, security is more guaranteed.

🔹 Ecosystem and Risks

- Solana: The ecosystem is mature, TVL exceeds 12 billion USD, but is classified as a “security” by the SEC, regulatory risk is extremely high; node hardware threshold is high, insufficient decentralization.

- Bitroot: In the early testnet stage, the ecosystem is still growing, but the node threshold is low, with great potential for decentralization; security needs long-term validation, but there is no regulatory risk.

🔹 Cost Advantage

- Solana: Transaction fee is about 0.0001 USD, which is already low.

- Bitroot: Transaction fee is as low as 1/20 of traditional public chains, with more prominent cost advantages. #加密市场观察
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Trending Articles

View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs