Bitroot信仰
Verified Creator
bitroot:生态定位 BTC生态原生并行公链，兼容BTC架构，支持资产跨链/代币化，切入DeFi、NFT赛道
Open Trade
USTC Holder
Frequent Trader
4.9 Years
2.0K+ Following
42.4K+ Followers
37.0K+ Liked
5.4K+ Shared
PINNED
🧧🧧⚔️ Ultimate Scaling Solution for the Bitcoin Ecosystem? Bitroot vs BRC20/Solana/EVM Full-Dimensional PK! Tune in tonight at 6:30 to the 'Bitroot Faith' live stream, where we will conduct an in-depth comparison across four key dimensions: TPS stability, Gas fee costs, AI native advantages, and cross-chain security, using real data to show you why Bitroot can become the 'Ace of Scaling' for the Bitcoin ecosystem! #比特币2026年价格预测
PINNED
🧧🧧👀 Binance Square Exclusive Benefits: Follow + Comment, randomly drop BTC red envelopes! The black ball has already tucked away the plump red envelopes!
🎯 Solana vs Bitroot Core Comparison Summary
🔹 Performance
- Solana: Theoretical TPS is very high, but the actual performance on the mainnet fluctuates greatly, relying on Firedancer optimization to approach 100,000 TPS; confirmation speed is fast, but historical outages are frequent.
- Bitroot: Testnet TPS has stabilized at 25,600–50,000, with peak pressure testing breaking 100,000, performance is more solid; confirmation time is slightly longer, but stability is better.
🔹 Technology and Development
- Solana: Developed in Rust, not compatible with EVM, high migration costs for developers; cross-chain relies on third-party bridges.
- Bitroot: EVM compatible, supports zero-cost migration with Solidity, reuses Ethereum toolchain; native cross-chain + zero-knowledge proof, security is more guaranteed.
🔹 Ecosystem and Risks
- Solana: The ecosystem is mature, TVL exceeds 12 billion USD, but is classified as a “security” by the SEC, regulatory risk is extremely high; node hardware threshold is high, insufficient decentralization.
- Bitroot: In the early testnet stage, the ecosystem is still growing, but the node threshold is low, with great potential for decentralization; security needs long-term validation, but there is no regulatory risk.
🔹 Cost Advantage
- Solana: Transaction fee is about 0.0001 USD, which is already low.
- Bitroot: Transaction fee is as low as 1/20 of traditional public chains, with more prominent cost advantages. #加密市场观察
🔹 Performance
- Solana: Theoretical TPS is very high, but the actual performance on the mainnet fluctuates greatly, relying on Firedancer optimization to approach 100,000 TPS; confirmation speed is fast, but historical outages are frequent.
- Bitroot: Testnet TPS has stabilized at 25,600–50,000, with peak pressure testing breaking 100,000, performance is more solid; confirmation time is slightly longer, but stability is better.
🔹 Technology and Development
- Solana: Developed in Rust, not compatible with EVM, high migration costs for developers; cross-chain relies on third-party bridges.
- Bitroot: EVM compatible, supports zero-cost migration with Solidity, reuses Ethereum toolchain; native cross-chain + zero-knowledge proof, security is more guaranteed.
🔹 Ecosystem and Risks
- Solana: The ecosystem is mature, TVL exceeds 12 billion USD, but is classified as a “security” by the SEC, regulatory risk is extremely high; node hardware threshold is high, insufficient decentralization.
- Bitroot: In the early testnet stage, the ecosystem is still growing, but the node threshold is low, with great potential for decentralization; security needs long-term validation, but there is no regulatory risk.
🔹 Cost Advantage
- Solana: Transaction fee is about 0.0001 USD, which is already low.
- Bitroot: Transaction fee is as low as 1/20 of traditional public chains, with more prominent cost advantages. #加密市场观察
Login to explore more contents