#nanotrading
nanotrading
14,088 views
107 Discussing
Hot
Latest
$ZEC slipped to about 1,256 this morning after getting rejected at 1,297 yesterday, and it's now sitting right on top of a stack of long liquidations.
The NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) puts value between the VAH at 1,302.5 and the VAL at 1,153.1, with the POC just under price in the low 1,220s. Right below us the chart tags long clusters of about $387.6M near 1,240 and $391.5M near 1,205. Above, the short side is around $426M, sitting just over 1,300.
Funding just flipped negative to roughly -0.004% per 8h after a week of positive prints, and retail accounts on Binance are leaning short at a 0.84 long/short ratio. Top traders are still about 56% long by position, and OI has been flat around 429K ZEC, so this looks like positioning shuffling rather than new money.
My plan: if 1,240 gives way on a 4h close I expect a quick sweep into the 1,205 pocket before any bounce. Reclaim 1,300 and those $426M of shorts become the target instead.
Does $ZEC sweep the 1,205 longs first, or squeeze the shorts above 1,300?
NFA, just my read 🔥
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ZEC #Zcash #NanoTrading
$ZEC slipped to about 1,256 this morning after getting rejected at 1,297 yesterday, and it's now sitting right on top of a stack of long liquidations.
The NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) puts value between the VAH at 1,302.5 and the VAL at 1,153.1, with the POC just under price in the low 1,220s. Right below us the chart tags long clusters of about $387.6M near 1,240 and $391.5M near 1,205. Above, the short side is around $426M, sitting just over 1,300.
Funding just flipped negative to roughly -0.004% per 8h after a week of positive prints, and retail accounts on Binance are leaning short at a 0.84 long/short ratio. Top traders are still about 56% long by position, and OI has been flat around 429K ZEC, so this looks like positioning shuffling rather than new money.
My plan: if 1,240 gives way on a 4h close I expect a quick sweep into the 1,205 pocket before any bounce. Reclaim 1,300 and those $426M of shorts become the target instead.
Does $ZEC sweep the 1,205 longs first, or squeeze the shorts above 1,300?
NFA, just my read 🔥
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ZEC #Zcash #NanoTrading
The NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) puts value between the VAH at 1,302.5 and the VAL at 1,153.1, with the POC just under price in the low 1,220s. Right below us the chart tags long clusters of about $387.6M near 1,240 and $391.5M near 1,205. Above, the short side is around $426M, sitting just over 1,300.
Funding just flipped negative to roughly -0.004% per 8h after a week of positive prints, and retail accounts on Binance are leaning short at a 0.84 long/short ratio. Top traders are still about 56% long by position, and OI has been flat around 429K ZEC, so this looks like positioning shuffling rather than new money.
My plan: if 1,240 gives way on a 4h close I expect a quick sweep into the 1,205 pocket before any bounce. Reclaim 1,300 and those $426M of shorts become the target instead.
Does $ZEC sweep the 1,205 longs first, or squeeze the shorts above 1,300?
NFA, just my read 🔥
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ZEC #Zcash #NanoTrading
481
$SUI has been stuck under 0.90 all day after the flush from 0.96 down to 0.826 earlier this week. It's sitting at 0.896 now, and the last few 4h candles keep stalling between 0.892 and 0.914.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the brightest liquidation band is right on price at 0.89-0.90, with more thick bands stacked below at 0.86-0.88, 0.85 and 0.82-0.83. Above price it's thinner, mostly 0.92-0.95. The volume POC is up near 0.99 and the value area low is around 0.912, so price is still trading below value.
Futures crowd is leaning long. About 67% of accounts are long (L/S 2.02), top traders around 66% long, and funding is pinned at 0.01%. OI crept up from about $88M to $91.5M over the last day while price went nowhere, so new longs are getting trapped in this range.
My read: with that much liquidation stacked underneath, I think $SUI sweeps 0.86-0.87 before it gets back into value. A 4h close above 0.914 flips that and opens 0.95.
Do you think the 0.86 area gets tagged first, or does it reclaim 0.91 straight away?
NFA, just my read 📉
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#SUI #Sui #NanoTrading
$SUI has been stuck under 0.90 all day after the flush from 0.96 down to 0.826 earlier this week. It's sitting at 0.896 now, and the last few 4h candles keep stalling between 0.892 and 0.914.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the brightest liquidation band is right on price at 0.89-0.90, with more thick bands stacked below at 0.86-0.88, 0.85 and 0.82-0.83. Above price it's thinner, mostly 0.92-0.95. The volume POC is up near 0.99 and the value area low is around 0.912, so price is still trading below value.
Futures crowd is leaning long. About 67% of accounts are long (L/S 2.02), top traders around 66% long, and funding is pinned at 0.01%. OI crept up from about $88M to $91.5M over the last day while price went nowhere, so new longs are getting trapped in this range.
My read: with that much liquidation stacked underneath, I think $SUI sweeps 0.86-0.87 before it gets back into value. A 4h close above 0.914 flips that and opens 0.95.
Do you think the 0.86 area gets tagged first, or does it reclaim 0.91 straight away?
NFA, just my read 📉
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#SUI #Sui #NanoTrading
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the brightest liquidation band is right on price at 0.89-0.90, with more thick bands stacked below at 0.86-0.88, 0.85 and 0.82-0.83. Above price it's thinner, mostly 0.92-0.95. The volume POC is up near 0.99 and the value area low is around 0.912, so price is still trading below value.
Futures crowd is leaning long. About 67% of accounts are long (L/S 2.02), top traders around 66% long, and funding is pinned at 0.01%. OI crept up from about $88M to $91.5M over the last day while price went nowhere, so new longs are getting trapped in this range.
My read: with that much liquidation stacked underneath, I think $SUI sweeps 0.86-0.87 before it gets back into value. A 4h close above 0.914 flips that and opens 0.95.
Do you think the 0.86 area gets tagged first, or does it reclaim 0.91 straight away?
NFA, just my read 📉
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#SUI #Sui #NanoTrading
3
1.3k
$LINK bounced from the 10.9 flush earlier this week and is now grinding around 11.65, up about 2% on the day. On the NanoTrading Fire chart the 4h POC sits at 11.99, and that's exactly where the biggest pocket of short liquidations is parked, roughly $99.6M near 12.00 with another ~$64.9M around 11.8.
Under price the long side is thinner and split up: about $43M and $41M stacked around 11.45-11.55, and another ~$42M near 11.3, just above the value area low at 11.23.
Binance perps are slowly loading up. OI went from about 7.90M to 8.14M LINK (~$94M) over the last day, funding is the default 0.01%, and ~66% of accounts are long (L/S 1.97), with top traders even more long at 2.41.
My read: $LINK holding 11.45 keeps the magnet pointed at that 11.8-12.0 short stack, and a clean 4h close above 12 is where it gets interesting. Lose 11.45 and those long clusters down to 11.3 probably get cleaned up first.
Do you think 12 gets tagged this week, or is the crowd too long here?
NFA, just my read of the map.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#LINK #NanoTrading #CryptoTrading
$LINK bounced from the 10.9 flush earlier this week and is now grinding around 11.65, up about 2% on the day. On the NanoTrading Fire chart the 4h POC sits at 11.99, and that's exactly where the biggest pocket of short liquidations is parked, roughly $99.6M near 12.00 with another ~$64.9M around 11.8.
Under price the long side is thinner and split up: about $43M and $41M stacked around 11.45-11.55, and another ~$42M near 11.3, just above the value area low at 11.23.
Binance perps are slowly loading up. OI went from about 7.90M to 8.14M LINK (~$94M) over the last day, funding is the default 0.01%, and ~66% of accounts are long (L/S 1.97), with top traders even more long at 2.41.
My read: $LINK holding 11.45 keeps the magnet pointed at that 11.8-12.0 short stack, and a clean 4h close above 12 is where it gets interesting. Lose 11.45 and those long clusters down to 11.3 probably get cleaned up first.
Do you think 12 gets tagged this week, or is the crowd too long here?
NFA, just my read of the map.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#LINK #NanoTrading #CryptoTrading
Under price the long side is thinner and split up: about $43M and $41M stacked around 11.45-11.55, and another ~$42M near 11.3, just above the value area low at 11.23.
Binance perps are slowly loading up. OI went from about 7.90M to 8.14M LINK (~$94M) over the last day, funding is the default 0.01%, and ~66% of accounts are long (L/S 1.97), with top traders even more long at 2.41.
My read: $LINK holding 11.45 keeps the magnet pointed at that 11.8-12.0 short stack, and a clean 4h close above 12 is where it gets interesting. Lose 11.45 and those long clusters down to 11.3 probably get cleaned up first.
Do you think 12 gets tagged this week, or is the crowd too long here?
NFA, just my read of the map.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#LINK #NanoTrading #CryptoTrading
90
$ENA is up about 12% on the day and sitting around 0.191, which is basically a full recovery off that 4h flush that wicked it down to 0.166 a couple of days ago. Still a long way from the 0.218 high it rejected before the dump though, so I'm not calling this a trend change yet.
Futures look pretty calm. Binance OI has been flat around $102M for the last ~16 hours, funding is near zero (~0.003%), and positioning is balanced: about 57% of accounts long, top traders roughly 56% long by position. Nobody is crowded here, which I actually like.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart 4h, VAL is 0.1869 just under price, POC up at 0.2075 and VAH near 0.2135. The liquidation heatmap shows the heavy long clusters stacked at 0.176-0.185, and the order book has real bid walls around 0.181 and 0.178. Overhead, short liquidation markers sit near 0.197 and 0.2025.
My read: hold 0.187 and those short clusters at 0.197-0.20 are the obvious magnet, with the POC at 0.2075 as the real test. Lose VAL and price probably goes back to sweep the 0.18 zone first 👀
Are you chasing $ENA into 0.20, or waiting for that 0.18 retest?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ENA #Ethena #NanoTrading
$ENA is up about 12% on the day and sitting around 0.191, which is basically a full recovery off that 4h flush that wicked it down to 0.166 a couple of days ago. Still a long way from the 0.218 high it rejected before the dump though, so I'm not calling this a trend change yet.
Futures look pretty calm. Binance OI has been flat around $102M for the last ~16 hours, funding is near zero (~0.003%), and positioning is balanced: about 57% of accounts long, top traders roughly 56% long by position. Nobody is crowded here, which I actually like.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart 4h, VAL is 0.1869 just under price, POC up at 0.2075 and VAH near 0.2135. The liquidation heatmap shows the heavy long clusters stacked at 0.176-0.185, and the order book has real bid walls around 0.181 and 0.178. Overhead, short liquidation markers sit near 0.197 and 0.2025.
My read: hold 0.187 and those short clusters at 0.197-0.20 are the obvious magnet, with the POC at 0.2075 as the real test. Lose VAL and price probably goes back to sweep the 0.18 zone first 👀
Are you chasing $ENA into 0.20, or waiting for that 0.18 retest?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ENA #Ethena #NanoTrading
Futures look pretty calm. Binance OI has been flat around $102M for the last ~16 hours, funding is near zero (~0.003%), and positioning is balanced: about 57% of accounts long, top traders roughly 56% long by position. Nobody is crowded here, which I actually like.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart 4h, VAL is 0.1869 just under price, POC up at 0.2075 and VAH near 0.2135. The liquidation heatmap shows the heavy long clusters stacked at 0.176-0.185, and the order book has real bid walls around 0.181 and 0.178. Overhead, short liquidation markers sit near 0.197 and 0.2025.
My read: hold 0.187 and those short clusters at 0.197-0.20 are the obvious magnet, with the POC at 0.2075 as the real test. Lose VAL and price probably goes back to sweep the 0.18 zone first 👀
Are you chasing $ENA into 0.20, or waiting for that 0.18 retest?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ENA #Ethena #NanoTrading
1
1.4k
$BTC keeps getting sold into 81k. Today's range is 79,178 to 80,999 and price is sitting around 80,458, under the value area low at 80,855 on the 4h.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart the volume POC is up at 81,688, and right above price there are short liquidation stacks labeled about $3.57B and $3.03B around 81,000 to 81,300, plus another ~$3.26B near 83,700. Bright orange liquidity bands sit higher at roughly 85k and 87k. Below, the heatmap thins out with a small orange pocket near 79,400.
Binance futures data: OI slipped from about $7.75B to $7.50B over the last day, funding is positive but mild at 0.006% per 8h, and the long/short account ratio is still 2.10 with top traders at 1.67. So the crowd is long while price drifts lower.
My read: a 4h close back above 80,855 puts the 81k short stacks in play and $BTC could squeeze toward the 81.7k POC fast. Lose 79,178 and those crowded longs become the fuel down to the 79.4k pocket 👀
Are you fading 81k again or betting on the squeeze?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#BTC #Bitcoin #NanoTrading
$BTC keeps getting sold into 81k. Today's range is 79,178 to 80,999 and price is sitting around 80,458, under the value area low at 80,855 on the 4h.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart the volume POC is up at 81,688, and right above price there are short liquidation stacks labeled about $3.57B and $3.03B around 81,000 to 81,300, plus another ~$3.26B near 83,700. Bright orange liquidity bands sit higher at roughly 85k and 87k. Below, the heatmap thins out with a small orange pocket near 79,400.
Binance futures data: OI slipped from about $7.75B to $7.50B over the last day, funding is positive but mild at 0.006% per 8h, and the long/short account ratio is still 2.10 with top traders at 1.67. So the crowd is long while price drifts lower.
My read: a 4h close back above 80,855 puts the 81k short stacks in play and $BTC could squeeze toward the 81.7k POC fast. Lose 79,178 and those crowded longs become the fuel down to the 79.4k pocket 👀
Are you fading 81k again or betting on the squeeze?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#BTC #Bitcoin #NanoTrading
On the NanoTrading Fire chart the volume POC is up at 81,688, and right above price there are short liquidation stacks labeled about $3.57B and $3.03B around 81,000 to 81,300, plus another ~$3.26B near 83,700. Bright orange liquidity bands sit higher at roughly 85k and 87k. Below, the heatmap thins out with a small orange pocket near 79,400.
Binance futures data: OI slipped from about $7.75B to $7.50B over the last day, funding is positive but mild at 0.006% per 8h, and the long/short account ratio is still 2.10 with top traders at 1.67. So the crowd is long while price drifts lower.
My read: a 4h close back above 80,855 puts the 81k short stacks in play and $BTC could squeeze toward the 81.7k POC fast. Lose 79,178 and those crowded longs become the fuel down to the 79.4k pocket 👀
Are you fading 81k again or betting on the squeeze?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#BTC #Bitcoin #NanoTrading
3
34
$ENA bounced off 0.1837 yesterday and is back around 0.194, but every push toward 0.20 keeps getting sold. Still down about 3% on the day on Binance futures, so this bounce hasn't proven anything yet.
NanoTrading Fire chart 4h is pretty clear on where the fuel is. Biggest cluster on the board is ~$113.8M of shorts around 0.214, while two long stacks (~$67M and ~$59M) sit right under price near 0.192. POC is 0.1989, VAL 0.1845, so price is stuck just below value with the heaviest heat bands at 0.198-0.202.
Positioning leans long. ~61% of Binance accounts are long (L/S ~1.59) and top traders are around 61% long too. Funding is mildly positive (~0.005%), and OI slipped from ~495M to ~485M ENA during the dip, so some longs already got flushed but not all of them.
My read: lose 0.192 and those long stacks get swept, probably back to the 0.184-0.185 area. Reclaim 0.199 POC with volume and the 0.214 shorts become the magnet. Watching $BTC too since ENA won't do much alone 👀
Are you fading the 0.20 rejection on $ENA or waiting for the 0.214 squeeze?
NFA, just how i see it.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ENA #CryptoTrading #NanoTrading
$ENA bounced off 0.1837 yesterday and is back around 0.194, but every push toward 0.20 keeps getting sold. Still down about 3% on the day on Binance futures, so this bounce hasn't proven anything yet.
NanoTrading Fire chart 4h is pretty clear on where the fuel is. Biggest cluster on the board is ~$113.8M of shorts around 0.214, while two long stacks (~$67M and ~$59M) sit right under price near 0.192. POC is 0.1989, VAL 0.1845, so price is stuck just below value with the heaviest heat bands at 0.198-0.202.
Positioning leans long. ~61% of Binance accounts are long (L/S ~1.59) and top traders are around 61% long too. Funding is mildly positive (~0.005%), and OI slipped from ~495M to ~485M ENA during the dip, so some longs already got flushed but not all of them.
My read: lose 0.192 and those long stacks get swept, probably back to the 0.184-0.185 area. Reclaim 0.199 POC with volume and the 0.214 shorts become the magnet. Watching $BTC too since ENA won't do much alone 👀
Are you fading the 0.20 rejection on $ENA or waiting for the 0.214 squeeze?
NFA, just how i see it.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ENA #CryptoTrading #NanoTrading
NanoTrading Fire chart 4h is pretty clear on where the fuel is. Biggest cluster on the board is ~$113.8M of shorts around 0.214, while two long stacks (~$67M and ~$59M) sit right under price near 0.192. POC is 0.1989, VAL 0.1845, so price is stuck just below value with the heaviest heat bands at 0.198-0.202.
Positioning leans long. ~61% of Binance accounts are long (L/S ~1.59) and top traders are around 61% long too. Funding is mildly positive (~0.005%), and OI slipped from ~495M to ~485M ENA during the dip, so some longs already got flushed but not all of them.
My read: lose 0.192 and those long stacks get swept, probably back to the 0.184-0.185 area. Reclaim 0.199 POC with volume and the 0.214 shorts become the magnet. Watching $BTC too since ENA won't do much alone 👀
Are you fading the 0.20 rejection on $ENA or waiting for the 0.214 squeeze?
NFA, just how i see it.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ENA #CryptoTrading #NanoTrading
118
$ETH wicked to 2,281 last night on a ~$3.3B 4h candle and got bought straight back to ~2,338. Still down about 2.5% on the day, but that bounce was fast.
The part i don't love: Binance futures OI barely flushed (~2.33M down to ~2.30M ETH, ~$5.37B), and global accounts went even more long into the dump, now ~78% long (L/S 3.46). Top traders are calmer at ~62% long. Funding just tipped slightly negative (-0.003%).
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the heaviest bands sit right above us around 2,400-2,450, stacked on the POC at ~2,409. Below there's only a thin band near 2,300-2,320. So my read is $ETH either reclaims 2,370ish and gets pulled into 2,400+, or loses 2,300 and those crowded longs get squeezed back to the 2,281 low. Watching $BTC at 80k for the tell 👀
Is this bounce real or just longs refusing to let go?
NFA, just my read.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ETH #Ethereum #NanoTrading
$ETH wicked to 2,281 last night on a ~$3.3B 4h candle and got bought straight back to ~2,338. Still down about 2.5% on the day, but that bounce was fast.
The part i don't love: Binance futures OI barely flushed (~2.33M down to ~2.30M ETH, ~$5.37B), and global accounts went even more long into the dump, now ~78% long (L/S 3.46). Top traders are calmer at ~62% long. Funding just tipped slightly negative (-0.003%).
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the heaviest bands sit right above us around 2,400-2,450, stacked on the POC at ~2,409. Below there's only a thin band near 2,300-2,320. So my read is $ETH either reclaims 2,370ish and gets pulled into 2,400+, or loses 2,300 and those crowded longs get squeezed back to the 2,281 low. Watching $BTC at 80k for the tell 👀
Is this bounce real or just longs refusing to let go?
NFA, just my read.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ETH #Ethereum #NanoTrading
The part i don't love: Binance futures OI barely flushed (~2.33M down to ~2.30M ETH, ~$5.37B), and global accounts went even more long into the dump, now ~78% long (L/S 3.46). Top traders are calmer at ~62% long. Funding just tipped slightly negative (-0.003%).
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the heaviest bands sit right above us around 2,400-2,450, stacked on the POC at ~2,409. Below there's only a thin band near 2,300-2,320. So my read is $ETH either reclaims 2,370ish and gets pulled into 2,400+, or loses 2,300 and those crowded longs get squeezed back to the 2,281 low. Watching $BTC at 80k for the tell 👀
Is this bounce real or just longs refusing to let go?
NFA, just my read.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ETH #Ethereum #NanoTrading
72
$BTC lost 80k tonight and is sitting around 79.7k after wicking 79.18k on the 4h. That's the first daily trade under 80k in over a week, and it's been a straight bleed since the rejection near 84.9k.
The part that bugs me is who's buying it. Binance perp OI went up from about 93.0k to 95.1k BTC over the last ~8 hours while price kept dropping, and the share of retail accounts that are long climbed from 68.3% to 69.0%. Top traders went the other way, their long/short by position slid from 1.77 to 1.65. Funding is basically flat (0.001%), so nobody's paying up, they're just catching the knife.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is now below the whole value area. VAL is 80,900, POC 81,688, VAH 83,855. The thick heatmap cells sit right at 80k-81k, which used to be support and now is the first ceiling, and the liquidation bands are stacked from 81k up to 84k. Under 79k the book gets thin fast.
My plan: if $BTC reclaims 80.9k and holds, those stacked liqs above make a squeeze back toward 81.7k pretty easy. If 80k keeps acting as a lid, I think the late longs get flushed first and we look for bids in the high 78s 👀
Are you buying this dip under 80k or waiting for the late longs to get flushed first?
NFA, just my notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#BTC #Bitcoin #NanoTrading
$BTC lost 80k tonight and is sitting around 79.7k after wicking 79.18k on the 4h. That's the first daily trade under 80k in over a week, and it's been a straight bleed since the rejection near 84.9k.
The part that bugs me is who's buying it. Binance perp OI went up from about 93.0k to 95.1k BTC over the last ~8 hours while price kept dropping, and the share of retail accounts that are long climbed from 68.3% to 69.0%. Top traders went the other way, their long/short by position slid from 1.77 to 1.65. Funding is basically flat (0.001%), so nobody's paying up, they're just catching the knife.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is now below the whole value area. VAL is 80,900, POC 81,688, VAH 83,855. The thick heatmap cells sit right at 80k-81k, which used to be support and now is the first ceiling, and the liquidation bands are stacked from 81k up to 84k. Under 79k the book gets thin fast.
My plan: if $BTC reclaims 80.9k and holds, those stacked liqs above make a squeeze back toward 81.7k pretty easy. If 80k keeps acting as a lid, I think the late longs get flushed first and we look for bids in the high 78s 👀
Are you buying this dip under 80k or waiting for the late longs to get flushed first?
NFA, just my notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#BTC #Bitcoin #NanoTrading
The part that bugs me is who's buying it. Binance perp OI went up from about 93.0k to 95.1k BTC over the last ~8 hours while price kept dropping, and the share of retail accounts that are long climbed from 68.3% to 69.0%. Top traders went the other way, their long/short by position slid from 1.77 to 1.65. Funding is basically flat (0.001%), so nobody's paying up, they're just catching the knife.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is now below the whole value area. VAL is 80,900, POC 81,688, VAH 83,855. The thick heatmap cells sit right at 80k-81k, which used to be support and now is the first ceiling, and the liquidation bands are stacked from 81k up to 84k. Under 79k the book gets thin fast.
My plan: if $BTC reclaims 80.9k and holds, those stacked liqs above make a squeeze back toward 81.7k pretty easy. If 80k keeps acting as a lid, I think the late longs get flushed first and we look for bids in the high 78s 👀
Are you buying this dip under 80k or waiting for the late longs to get flushed first?
NFA, just my notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#BTC #Bitcoin #NanoTrading
32
$ETH has been quietly bleeding all day, 2,417 high down to about 2,350, and it's sitting near 2,371 now. On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is just above the value area low around 2,354, and there's a fat liquidation cluster underneath at roughly 2,260-2,300.
What bugs me is positioning. About 76% of Binance futures accounts are long $ETH right now, which is a lot for a chart that keeps making lower highs. Top traders are less keen, around 62% long. OI has drifted from about $5.66B to $5.51B, so it's slow bleed, not a flush yet. Funding is still positive but small.
Above, the first liquidation bands sit around 2,385-2,420 and the heavier ones at 2,430-2,465, right where the volume POC is (about 2,454). Liquidity walls show up near 2,520 and 2,600.
My read: as long as $ETH holds 2,340-2,355 I'd expect a squeeze into 2,430+. Lose 2,340 on a 4h close and that crowded long side probably gets swept toward 2,300 first. Watching $BTC too, since ETH isn't moving on its own here.
With 3 out of 4 accounts long, do you think 2,340 actually holds?
NFA, just my view.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ETH #Ethereum #NanoTrading
$ETH has been quietly bleeding all day, 2,417 high down to about 2,350, and it's sitting near 2,371 now. On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is just above the value area low around 2,354, and there's a fat liquidation cluster underneath at roughly 2,260-2,300.
What bugs me is positioning. About 76% of Binance futures accounts are long $ETH right now, which is a lot for a chart that keeps making lower highs. Top traders are less keen, around 62% long. OI has drifted from about $5.66B to $5.51B, so it's slow bleed, not a flush yet. Funding is still positive but small.
Above, the first liquidation bands sit around 2,385-2,420 and the heavier ones at 2,430-2,465, right where the volume POC is (about 2,454). Liquidity walls show up near 2,520 and 2,600.
My read: as long as $ETH holds 2,340-2,355 I'd expect a squeeze into 2,430+. Lose 2,340 on a 4h close and that crowded long side probably gets swept toward 2,300 first. Watching $BTC too, since ETH isn't moving on its own here.
With 3 out of 4 accounts long, do you think 2,340 actually holds?
NFA, just my view.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ETH #Ethereum #NanoTrading
What bugs me is positioning. About 76% of Binance futures accounts are long $ETH right now, which is a lot for a chart that keeps making lower highs. Top traders are less keen, around 62% long. OI has drifted from about $5.66B to $5.51B, so it's slow bleed, not a flush yet. Funding is still positive but small.
Above, the first liquidation bands sit around 2,385-2,420 and the heavier ones at 2,430-2,465, right where the volume POC is (about 2,454). Liquidity walls show up near 2,520 and 2,600.
My read: as long as $ETH holds 2,340-2,355 I'd expect a squeeze into 2,430+. Lose 2,340 on a 4h close and that crowded long side probably gets swept toward 2,300 first. Watching $BTC too, since ETH isn't moving on its own here.
With 3 out of 4 accounts long, do you think 2,340 actually holds?
NFA, just my view.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ETH #Ethereum #NanoTrading
28
$ONDO bounced about 5% today off the 0.386 low, pushed up to 0.423 and got sold right back to around 0.408. Second 4h push into the 0.42s that couldn't hold.
Futures side is interesting. Binance OI on ONDO actually slipped from roughly $45.8M to about $43.2M over the last 24h while price went up, so this looks more like shorts covering than fresh longs. Funding is flat around +0.005% and top traders sit about 2.3 long/short by position, retail drifting up from 1.26 to 1.37. Longs are crowded, just not adding.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart 4h the thickest liquidation band is right under price at roughly 0.392-0.40, which lines up with the value-area low near 0.40. Overhead there's a band around 0.418-0.42, then the volume POC near 0.433. The heatmap shows most resting liquidity hugging 0.40-0.41 with a chunk sitting near 0.42.
My read: $ONDO needs a 4h close over 0.42 to open 0.433. Lose 0.40 and that band below probably gets swept toward 0.39 first. Range trading it until one side breaks 👀
Do you think this OI drop is shorts giving up, or longs quietly leaving?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ONDO #RWA #NanoTrading
$ONDO bounced about 5% today off the 0.386 low, pushed up to 0.423 and got sold right back to around 0.408. Second 4h push into the 0.42s that couldn't hold.
Futures side is interesting. Binance OI on ONDO actually slipped from roughly $45.8M to about $43.2M over the last 24h while price went up, so this looks more like shorts covering than fresh longs. Funding is flat around +0.005% and top traders sit about 2.3 long/short by position, retail drifting up from 1.26 to 1.37. Longs are crowded, just not adding.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart 4h the thickest liquidation band is right under price at roughly 0.392-0.40, which lines up with the value-area low near 0.40. Overhead there's a band around 0.418-0.42, then the volume POC near 0.433. The heatmap shows most resting liquidity hugging 0.40-0.41 with a chunk sitting near 0.42.
My read: $ONDO needs a 4h close over 0.42 to open 0.433. Lose 0.40 and that band below probably gets swept toward 0.39 first. Range trading it until one side breaks 👀
Do you think this OI drop is shorts giving up, or longs quietly leaving?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ONDO #RWA #NanoTrading
Futures side is interesting. Binance OI on ONDO actually slipped from roughly $45.8M to about $43.2M over the last 24h while price went up, so this looks more like shorts covering than fresh longs. Funding is flat around +0.005% and top traders sit about 2.3 long/short by position, retail drifting up from 1.26 to 1.37. Longs are crowded, just not adding.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart 4h the thickest liquidation band is right under price at roughly 0.392-0.40, which lines up with the value-area low near 0.40. Overhead there's a band around 0.418-0.42, then the volume POC near 0.433. The heatmap shows most resting liquidity hugging 0.40-0.41 with a chunk sitting near 0.42.
My read: $ONDO needs a 4h close over 0.42 to open 0.433. Lose 0.40 and that band below probably gets swept toward 0.39 first. Range trading it until one side breaks 👀
Do you think this OI drop is shorts giving up, or longs quietly leaving?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ONDO #RWA #NanoTrading
115
$SUI keeps bleeding, sitting around 0.93 after tagging 0.915 on the last 4h candle. It's now the fourth red daily in a row and it lost the 1.00 handle that held most of the week.
Funny part is the futures side barely flinched. OI on Binance perps has been flat around $102-105M for two days, funding is basically neutral (-0.002%), and top traders are still about 2:1 long by position. So nobody really got flushed yet, the longs just sat through it.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is below the value area now, VAL sits near 0.96 and the POC is way up at 1.037. Heatmap shows a thick band right under us at 0.90-0.93 and the heavy walls overhead start at 1.00-1.02, with another stack at 1.05-1.07.
My read: as long as 0.90 holds this is just a drift into support, and a reclaim of 0.96 opens the move back to 1.00. Lose 0.90 with all those longs still in and $SUI could get ugly fast 👀
Are you buying this 0.90 zone or waiting for the longs to get washed first?
NFA, just my notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#SUI #Altcoins #NanoTrading
$SUI keeps bleeding, sitting around 0.93 after tagging 0.915 on the last 4h candle. It's now the fourth red daily in a row and it lost the 1.00 handle that held most of the week.
Funny part is the futures side barely flinched. OI on Binance perps has been flat around $102-105M for two days, funding is basically neutral (-0.002%), and top traders are still about 2:1 long by position. So nobody really got flushed yet, the longs just sat through it.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is below the value area now, VAL sits near 0.96 and the POC is way up at 1.037. Heatmap shows a thick band right under us at 0.90-0.93 and the heavy walls overhead start at 1.00-1.02, with another stack at 1.05-1.07.
My read: as long as 0.90 holds this is just a drift into support, and a reclaim of 0.96 opens the move back to 1.00. Lose 0.90 with all those longs still in and $SUI could get ugly fast 👀
Are you buying this 0.90 zone or waiting for the longs to get washed first?
NFA, just my notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#SUI #Altcoins #NanoTrading
Funny part is the futures side barely flinched. OI on Binance perps has been flat around $102-105M for two days, funding is basically neutral (-0.002%), and top traders are still about 2:1 long by position. So nobody really got flushed yet, the longs just sat through it.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is below the value area now, VAL sits near 0.96 and the POC is way up at 1.037. Heatmap shows a thick band right under us at 0.90-0.93 and the heavy walls overhead start at 1.00-1.02, with another stack at 1.05-1.07.
My read: as long as 0.90 holds this is just a drift into support, and a reclaim of 0.96 opens the move back to 1.00. Lose 0.90 with all those longs still in and $SUI could get ugly fast 👀
Are you buying this 0.90 zone or waiting for the longs to get washed first?
NFA, just my notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#SUI #Altcoins #NanoTrading
174
$SOL has spent the whole night pinned between 95 and 96.5, which is basically a holding pattern after the 92.25 wick on the 31st. Down about 1% on the day and the 4h candles keep getting smaller.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is stuck under the value area low around 100, with the POC way up near 104.5. The liquidity heatmap shows a thick band right at 95.5-96 where we're chopping, more stacked below around 93-94, and the next real wall overhead sits at 99-100, then 101-102.
Futures side is lopsided. Roughly 75% of Binance accounts are long (ratio about 3.0) and top trader accounts are at 3.6, funding is back positive at +0.0075% after being negative yesterday, and OI is flat near $840M. So the longs reloaded but price didn't follow.
My read: as long as 93-94 holds, a push into the 99-100 wall is on the table. But with that many longs already in, losing 93 could flush quickly toward the 92 wick 👀 I'm waiting for one side to break before I touch $SOL.
Are you buying this range or waiting for the long flush first?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#SOL #Solana #NanoTrading
$SOL has spent the whole night pinned between 95 and 96.5, which is basically a holding pattern after the 92.25 wick on the 31st. Down about 1% on the day and the 4h candles keep getting smaller.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is stuck under the value area low around 100, with the POC way up near 104.5. The liquidity heatmap shows a thick band right at 95.5-96 where we're chopping, more stacked below around 93-94, and the next real wall overhead sits at 99-100, then 101-102.
Futures side is lopsided. Roughly 75% of Binance accounts are long (ratio about 3.0) and top trader accounts are at 3.6, funding is back positive at +0.0075% after being negative yesterday, and OI is flat near $840M. So the longs reloaded but price didn't follow.
My read: as long as 93-94 holds, a push into the 99-100 wall is on the table. But with that many longs already in, losing 93 could flush quickly toward the 92 wick 👀 I'm waiting for one side to break before I touch $SOL .
Are you buying this range or waiting for the long flush first?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#SOL #Solana #NanoTrading
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is stuck under the value area low around 100, with the POC way up near 104.5. The liquidity heatmap shows a thick band right at 95.5-96 where we're chopping, more stacked below around 93-94, and the next real wall overhead sits at 99-100, then 101-102.
Futures side is lopsided. Roughly 75% of Binance accounts are long (ratio about 3.0) and top trader accounts are at 3.6, funding is back positive at +0.0075% after being negative yesterday, and OI is flat near $840M. So the longs reloaded but price didn't follow.
My read: as long as 93-94 holds, a push into the 99-100 wall is on the table. But with that many longs already in, losing 93 could flush quickly toward the 92 wick 👀 I'm waiting for one side to break before I touch $SOL .
Are you buying this range or waiting for the long flush first?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#SOL #Solana #NanoTrading
551
$TAO wicked down to 219.6 two days ago, got bought right back, and has been grinding sideways around 236 since. 24h range is 228.7 to 239.8. Ten days ago it was trading near 257, so it's still well under where this dump started.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the biggest liquidation cluster sits right under price: roughly $30M of long liquidations at 232 to 234. Above, short liquidation bands stack at 242 to 243 (~$23M), around 250 (~$23.5M) and 268 to 270 (~$24M). Volume POC is way up at about 272 and value area low is near 249, so price is trading well below value.
Positioning is split. Accounts are only about 55% long (L/S 1.23), but top traders are around 75% long by position (ratio 3.0). Funding is barely positive at 0.005% and OI is flat at about $53M. So no fresh money chasing either way.
My read: 232 to 234 is the line. That long pocket is close enough that I think it gets tested first. If it holds and $TAO closes a 4h above 243, I think the short bands at 250 get pulled in. Lose 232 and the 220 wick area is back in play.
Do you trust the big wallets being 75% long here, or is that the liquidity sitting under 232?
NFA, just my read 🧠
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#TAO #Bittensor #NanoTrading
$TAO wicked down to 219.6 two days ago, got bought right back, and has been grinding sideways around 236 since. 24h range is 228.7 to 239.8. Ten days ago it was trading near 257, so it's still well under where this dump started.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the biggest liquidation cluster sits right under price: roughly $30M of long liquidations at 232 to 234. Above, short liquidation bands stack at 242 to 243 (~$23M), around 250 (~$23.5M) and 268 to 270 (~$24M). Volume POC is way up at about 272 and value area low is near 249, so price is trading well below value.
Positioning is split. Accounts are only about 55% long (L/S 1.23), but top traders are around 75% long by position (ratio 3.0). Funding is barely positive at 0.005% and OI is flat at about $53M. So no fresh money chasing either way.
My read: 232 to 234 is the line. That long pocket is close enough that I think it gets tested first. If it holds and $TAO closes a 4h above 243, I think the short bands at 250 get pulled in. Lose 232 and the 220 wick area is back in play.
Do you trust the big wallets being 75% long here, or is that the liquidity sitting under 232?
NFA, just my read 🧠
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#TAO #Bittensor #NanoTrading
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the biggest liquidation cluster sits right under price: roughly $30M of long liquidations at 232 to 234. Above, short liquidation bands stack at 242 to 243 (~$23M), around 250 (~$23.5M) and 268 to 270 (~$24M). Volume POC is way up at about 272 and value area low is near 249, so price is trading well below value.
Positioning is split. Accounts are only about 55% long (L/S 1.23), but top traders are around 75% long by position (ratio 3.0). Funding is barely positive at 0.005% and OI is flat at about $53M. So no fresh money chasing either way.
My read: 232 to 234 is the line. That long pocket is close enough that I think it gets tested first. If it holds and $TAO closes a 4h above 243, I think the short bands at 250 get pulled in. Lose 232 and the 220 wick area is back in play.
Do you trust the big wallets being 75% long here, or is that the liquidity sitting under 232?
NFA, just my read 🧠
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#TAO #Bittensor #NanoTrading
1
623
$INJ ripped from 7.08 to 7.55 in a single 4h candle tonight and got slapped straight back to 7.33. 24h range is 6.86 to 7.55. Ten days ago it was trading near 8.60, so this is still a bounce inside a downtrend, not a reversal yet.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the wick ran right into the first overhead cluster, labeled about $20.2M around 7.55. The next ones stack above it: roughly $36.6M near 7.70 and $41.2M near 8.50. Volume POC sits at 7.94 with value area low near 7.47, so price is still trading under value. Below price the long liquidation bands are thickest at 7.00 to 7.10, with an older pocket around 6.88.
Positioning is split. About 54% of accounts are short (L/S 0.84), but top traders are around 64% long by position (ratio 1.77). OI slipped from roughly 2.86M to 2.74M INJ during the pump, so that push looks more like shorts covering than fresh longs. Funding is basically flat at ~0.003%.
My read: 7.55 is the line. A 4h close above it probably drags price toward the 7.70 cluster and the 7.94 POC. Lose 7.20 and I think the 7.00 to 7.10 long pocket gets swept first.
Do you think $INJ breaks 7.55 on the next try, or do the longs at 7.00 get hunted first?
NFA, just my read 🧠
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#INJ #Injective #NanoTrading
$INJ ripped from 7.08 to 7.55 in a single 4h candle tonight and got slapped straight back to 7.33. 24h range is 6.86 to 7.55. Ten days ago it was trading near 8.60, so this is still a bounce inside a downtrend, not a reversal yet.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the wick ran right into the first overhead cluster, labeled about $20.2M around 7.55. The next ones stack above it: roughly $36.6M near 7.70 and $41.2M near 8.50. Volume POC sits at 7.94 with value area low near 7.47, so price is still trading under value. Below price the long liquidation bands are thickest at 7.00 to 7.10, with an older pocket around 6.88.
Positioning is split. About 54% of accounts are short (L/S 0.84), but top traders are around 64% long by position (ratio 1.77). OI slipped from roughly 2.86M to 2.74M INJ during the pump, so that push looks more like shorts covering than fresh longs. Funding is basically flat at ~0.003%.
My read: 7.55 is the line. A 4h close above it probably drags price toward the 7.70 cluster and the 7.94 POC. Lose 7.20 and I think the 7.00 to 7.10 long pocket gets swept first.
Do you think $INJ breaks 7.55 on the next try, or do the longs at 7.00 get hunted first?
NFA, just my read 🧠
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#INJ #Injective #NanoTrading
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the wick ran right into the first overhead cluster, labeled about $20.2M around 7.55. The next ones stack above it: roughly $36.6M near 7.70 and $41.2M near 8.50. Volume POC sits at 7.94 with value area low near 7.47, so price is still trading under value. Below price the long liquidation bands are thickest at 7.00 to 7.10, with an older pocket around 6.88.
Positioning is split. About 54% of accounts are short (L/S 0.84), but top traders are around 64% long by position (ratio 1.77). OI slipped from roughly 2.86M to 2.74M INJ during the pump, so that push looks more like shorts covering than fresh longs. Funding is basically flat at ~0.003%.
My read: 7.55 is the line. A 4h close above it probably drags price toward the 7.70 cluster and the 7.94 POC. Lose 7.20 and I think the 7.00 to 7.10 long pocket gets swept first.
Do you think $INJ breaks 7.55 on the next try, or do the longs at 7.00 get hunted first?
NFA, just my read 🧠
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#INJ #Injective #NanoTrading
502
$XRP has been stuck in a tight 1.23-1.26 box for two days and it's now sitting around 1.251, below the 4h value area low at 1.271. On the NanoTrading Fire chart the big money is parked overhead: two short liquidation clusters of roughly $213M and $186M stacked around 1.29-1.30, right where the POC sits at 1.301. Below, the main long block is much smaller, about $105M near 1.23.
Binance perps look calm but crowded on one side. OI is flat at about 266.7M XRP (~$333M) over the last day, funding is the default 0.01%, and ~72% of accounts are long (L/S 2.55), top traders 2.46. Lots of longs, no fresh leverage coming in.
My read: as long as $XRP holds 1.23 the path of least pain points up into that 1.29-1.30 short pocket, and a reclaim of 1.271 is my trigger. If 1.23 breaks, that $105M long block gets swept first and I step aside.
Range break up into the shorts, or one more flush to 1.23 first? 👀
NFA, just how I'm reading the map.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#XRP #NanoTrading #CryptoTrading
$XRP has been stuck in a tight 1.23-1.26 box for two days and it's now sitting around 1.251, below the 4h value area low at 1.271. On the NanoTrading Fire chart the big money is parked overhead: two short liquidation clusters of roughly $213M and $186M stacked around 1.29-1.30, right where the POC sits at 1.301. Below, the main long block is much smaller, about $105M near 1.23.
Binance perps look calm but crowded on one side. OI is flat at about 266.7M XRP (~$333M) over the last day, funding is the default 0.01%, and ~72% of accounts are long (L/S 2.55), top traders 2.46. Lots of longs, no fresh leverage coming in.
My read: as long as $XRP holds 1.23 the path of least pain points up into that 1.29-1.30 short pocket, and a reclaim of 1.271 is my trigger. If 1.23 breaks, that $105M long block gets swept first and I step aside.
Range break up into the shorts, or one more flush to 1.23 first? 👀
NFA, just how I'm reading the map.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#XRP #NanoTrading #CryptoTrading
Binance perps look calm but crowded on one side. OI is flat at about 266.7M XRP (~$333M) over the last day, funding is the default 0.01%, and ~72% of accounts are long (L/S 2.55), top traders 2.46. Lots of longs, no fresh leverage coming in.
My read: as long as $XRP holds 1.23 the path of least pain points up into that 1.29-1.30 short pocket, and a reclaim of 1.271 is my trigger. If 1.23 breaks, that $105M long block gets swept first and I step aside.
Range break up into the shorts, or one more flush to 1.23 first? 👀
NFA, just how I'm reading the map.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#XRP #NanoTrading #CryptoTrading
1
489
$AVAX just ripped about 5% on the day and is pressing 8.97, right at the top of today's range. The fun part is the futures side: funding actually flipped negative, around -0.013% per 8h on the last print, so a decent chunk of the market is shorting into this move.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the book is stacked on both sides. There's roughly $67M of bids sitting just under price near 8.85, and overhead the short-side liquidity is thick, about $59M near 9.4, $62M near 9.55 and $65M close to 9.9, with the VAH up around 10. The liquidation heatmap has its densest bands at 8.5-8.7, right where this leg started.
Binance data is split in a weird way. Top traders are about 2.3 long by position while funding sits negative, and OI is back near $80M from about $74M earlier today, so fresh positions are coming in on this push.
My read: as long as 8.85 holds, negative funding with rising OI is fuel for a squeeze into the 9.4-9.55 wall for $AVAX. Lose 8.85 and I'd expect a fast sweep of 8.5-8.7 first 👀
Do you think the shorts here get squeezed, or is this just a bounce into sellers?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#AVAX #Avalanche #NanoTrading
$AVAX just ripped about 5% on the day and is pressing 8.97, right at the top of today's range. The fun part is the futures side: funding actually flipped negative, around -0.013% per 8h on the last print, so a decent chunk of the market is shorting into this move.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the book is stacked on both sides. There's roughly $67M of bids sitting just under price near 8.85, and overhead the short-side liquidity is thick, about $59M near 9.4, $62M near 9.55 and $65M close to 9.9, with the VAH up around 10. The liquidation heatmap has its densest bands at 8.5-8.7, right where this leg started.
Binance data is split in a weird way. Top traders are about 2.3 long by position while funding sits negative, and OI is back near $80M from about $74M earlier today, so fresh positions are coming in on this push.
My read: as long as 8.85 holds, negative funding with rising OI is fuel for a squeeze into the 9.4-9.55 wall for $AVAX . Lose 8.85 and I'd expect a fast sweep of 8.5-8.7 first 👀
Do you think the shorts here get squeezed, or is this just a bounce into sellers?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#AVAX #Avalanche #NanoTrading
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the book is stacked on both sides. There's roughly $67M of bids sitting just under price near 8.85, and overhead the short-side liquidity is thick, about $59M near 9.4, $62M near 9.55 and $65M close to 9.9, with the VAH up around 10. The liquidation heatmap has its densest bands at 8.5-8.7, right where this leg started.
Binance data is split in a weird way. Top traders are about 2.3 long by position while funding sits negative, and OI is back near $80M from about $74M earlier today, so fresh positions are coming in on this push.
My read: as long as 8.85 holds, negative funding with rising OI is fuel for a squeeze into the 9.4-9.55 wall for $AVAX . Lose 8.85 and I'd expect a fast sweep of 8.5-8.7 first 👀
Do you think the shorts here get squeezed, or is this just a bounce into sellers?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#AVAX #Avalanche #NanoTrading
128
$DOT flushed from 1.01 to 0.889 two days ago, wicked 0.867 the next session, and has been chopping 0.95 to 0.98 since. 24h range is 0.949 to 0.983. Ten days ago it was trading near 1.14, so the bounce hasn't won back much.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the closest fuel sits right overhead: short liquidation clusters labeled about $28.3M and $30.5M stacked around 0.99 to 1.00. Below price the long liquidation bands are thick at 0.90 to 0.94. Volume POC is way up at 1.161 and value area low is about 1.004, so price is trading under value.
Positioning leans long. About 59% of accounts are long (L/S 1.44) and top traders are around 70% long by position (ratio 2.36). OI is flat at roughly 31M DOT (~$30M) and funding just flipped back positive to ~0.01% after a negative print. Nobody is adding size here.
My read: 1.00 is the line. A 4h close back above it probably pulls those short bands in and opens a move toward value. Keep getting rejected under 0.98 and I think the 0.90 to 0.94 long pocket gets tested first.
Do you think $DOT reclaims 1.00, or do the longs at 0.90 get hunted first?
NFA, just my read 🧠
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#DOT #Polkadot #NanoTrading
$DOT flushed from 1.01 to 0.889 two days ago, wicked 0.867 the next session, and has been chopping 0.95 to 0.98 since. 24h range is 0.949 to 0.983. Ten days ago it was trading near 1.14, so the bounce hasn't won back much.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the closest fuel sits right overhead: short liquidation clusters labeled about $28.3M and $30.5M stacked around 0.99 to 1.00. Below price the long liquidation bands are thick at 0.90 to 0.94. Volume POC is way up at 1.161 and value area low is about 1.004, so price is trading under value.
Positioning leans long. About 59% of accounts are long (L/S 1.44) and top traders are around 70% long by position (ratio 2.36). OI is flat at roughly 31M DOT (~$30M) and funding just flipped back positive to ~0.01% after a negative print. Nobody is adding size here.
My read: 1.00 is the line. A 4h close back above it probably pulls those short bands in and opens a move toward value. Keep getting rejected under 0.98 and I think the 0.90 to 0.94 long pocket gets tested first.
Do you think $DOT reclaims 1.00, or do the longs at 0.90 get hunted first?
NFA, just my read 🧠
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#DOT #Polkadot #NanoTrading
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the closest fuel sits right overhead: short liquidation clusters labeled about $28.3M and $30.5M stacked around 0.99 to 1.00. Below price the long liquidation bands are thick at 0.90 to 0.94. Volume POC is way up at 1.161 and value area low is about 1.004, so price is trading under value.
Positioning leans long. About 59% of accounts are long (L/S 1.44) and top traders are around 70% long by position (ratio 2.36). OI is flat at roughly 31M DOT (~$30M) and funding just flipped back positive to ~0.01% after a negative print. Nobody is adding size here.
My read: 1.00 is the line. A 4h close back above it probably pulls those short bands in and opens a move toward value. Keep getting rejected under 0.98 and I think the 0.90 to 0.94 long pocket gets tested first.
Do you think $DOT reclaims 1.00, or do the longs at 0.90 get hunted first?
NFA, just my read 🧠
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#DOT #Polkadot #NanoTrading
1
376
$ENA is down about 2.7% on the day near 0.188, and it's still chopping in the 0.186-0.196 box it built after that nasty 4h dump from 0.21 to the 0.166 wick two days ago. About $154M traded on futures in 24h, so it's not dead, just undecided.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the thickest bids sit right under price around 0.178-0.182, and the liquidation heatmap shows the heavy long liq band stacked just below that at roughly 0.17-0.175. Shorts are thinner and higher up, mostly 0.21-0.22, which also lines up with the volume POC near 0.207 from before the drop.
Futures look tired rather than crowded. Funding has been flat to slightly negative, OI drifted from about 547M to 528M ENA while price ground sideways, and top traders are still about 1.75 long. Longs haven't really left, they're just not adding.
My read: as long as 0.178 holds, $ENA can grind back toward 0.196 and maybe tag the 0.207 POC. If those bids get pulled, the 0.17-0.175 long liqs are the obvious magnet and I'd expect a fast wick there first 👀
Do you think ENA reclaims 0.20 this week, or do the longs under 0.178 get flushed first?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ENA #Altcoins #NanoTrading
$ENA is down about 2.7% on the day near 0.188, and it's still chopping in the 0.186-0.196 box it built after that nasty 4h dump from 0.21 to the 0.166 wick two days ago. About $154M traded on futures in 24h, so it's not dead, just undecided.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the thickest bids sit right under price around 0.178-0.182, and the liquidation heatmap shows the heavy long liq band stacked just below that at roughly 0.17-0.175. Shorts are thinner and higher up, mostly 0.21-0.22, which also lines up with the volume POC near 0.207 from before the drop.
Futures look tired rather than crowded. Funding has been flat to slightly negative, OI drifted from about 547M to 528M ENA while price ground sideways, and top traders are still about 1.75 long. Longs haven't really left, they're just not adding.
My read: as long as 0.178 holds, $ENA can grind back toward 0.196 and maybe tag the 0.207 POC. If those bids get pulled, the 0.17-0.175 long liqs are the obvious magnet and I'd expect a fast wick there first 👀
Do you think ENA reclaims 0.20 this week, or do the longs under 0.178 get flushed first?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ENA #Altcoins #NanoTrading
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the thickest bids sit right under price around 0.178-0.182, and the liquidation heatmap shows the heavy long liq band stacked just below that at roughly 0.17-0.175. Shorts are thinner and higher up, mostly 0.21-0.22, which also lines up with the volume POC near 0.207 from before the drop.
Futures look tired rather than crowded. Funding has been flat to slightly negative, OI drifted from about 547M to 528M ENA while price ground sideways, and top traders are still about 1.75 long. Longs haven't really left, they're just not adding.
My read: as long as 0.178 holds, $ENA can grind back toward 0.196 and maybe tag the 0.207 POC. If those bids get pulled, the 0.17-0.175 long liqs are the obvious magnet and I'd expect a fast wick there first 👀
Do you think ENA reclaims 0.20 this week, or do the longs under 0.178 get flushed first?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#ENA #Altcoins #NanoTrading
1
539
$NEAR is up about 2.7% on the day around 4.43, and it's quietly rebuilt most of the drop to the 3.90 wick from two days ago. Volume's been solid too, roughly $327M on futures in 24h.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is sitting right on the value area low around 4.43-4.44, with the volume POC way up near 5.0. The liquidation map has a thick band of short liqs stacked at about 4.55-4.85, heaviest around 4.60-4.70, while long liqs are packed underneath at roughly 4.15-4.40. There's also a long-running bid band near 3.97-4.00 that has held the whole time.
Futures lean crowded long. Funding has been sitting near +0.01% most of the last two days, OI slipped from about 43.8M to 42.3M NEAR while price went up, and top traders are long at 1.95. So it's spot-ish buying with longs already leaning in, not a fresh short squeeze yet.
My plan: holding 4.40 keeps $NEAR aimed at that 4.60-4.70 short liq pocket, and if that gets swept the magnet is the POC near 5.0. Lose 4.30 and the long liqs down to 4.15 probably get flushed first.
Do you think NEAR runs the 4.70 shorts first, or flushes the longs under 4.30?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#NEAR #Altcoins #NanoTrading
$NEAR is up about 2.7% on the day around 4.43, and it's quietly rebuilt most of the drop to the 3.90 wick from two days ago. Volume's been solid too, roughly $327M on futures in 24h.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is sitting right on the value area low around 4.43-4.44, with the volume POC way up near 5.0. The liquidation map has a thick band of short liqs stacked at about 4.55-4.85, heaviest around 4.60-4.70, while long liqs are packed underneath at roughly 4.15-4.40. There's also a long-running bid band near 3.97-4.00 that has held the whole time.
Futures lean crowded long. Funding has been sitting near +0.01% most of the last two days, OI slipped from about 43.8M to 42.3M NEAR while price went up, and top traders are long at 1.95. So it's spot-ish buying with longs already leaning in, not a fresh short squeeze yet.
My plan: holding 4.40 keeps $NEAR aimed at that 4.60-4.70 short liq pocket, and if that gets swept the magnet is the POC near 5.0. Lose 4.30 and the long liqs down to 4.15 probably get flushed first.
Do you think NEAR runs the 4.70 shorts first, or flushes the longs under 4.30?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#NEAR #Altcoins #NanoTrading
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) price is sitting right on the value area low around 4.43-4.44, with the volume POC way up near 5.0. The liquidation map has a thick band of short liqs stacked at about 4.55-4.85, heaviest around 4.60-4.70, while long liqs are packed underneath at roughly 4.15-4.40. There's also a long-running bid band near 3.97-4.00 that has held the whole time.
Futures lean crowded long. Funding has been sitting near +0.01% most of the last two days, OI slipped from about 43.8M to 42.3M NEAR while price went up, and top traders are long at 1.95. So it's spot-ish buying with longs already leaning in, not a fresh short squeeze yet.
My plan: holding 4.40 keeps $NEAR aimed at that 4.60-4.70 short liq pocket, and if that gets swept the magnet is the POC near 5.0. Lose 4.30 and the long liqs down to 4.15 probably get flushed first.
Do you think NEAR runs the 4.70 shorts first, or flushes the longs under 4.30?
NFA, just my chart notes.
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#NEAR #Altcoins #NanoTrading
2
540
$AVAX bounced from the 7.99 wick earlier this week and has been grinding back up. It's at 8.50 now, after a 24h range of 8.18 to 8.64, and the last few 4h candles keep holding above 8.40.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the liquidation map is lopsided. The big clusters are all overhead: roughly $67M around 9.3, $62M near 9.6 and $44M near 9.9. Below price there's a dense band from 8.5 down to 8.3, but nothing that size. The volume POC sits up near 8.88, so price is still trading under value.
Futures positioning is long but not stretched. About 60% of accounts are long (L/S 1.52), top traders are about 70% long, and funding is only around 0.006%. OI has been flat at roughly $73-75M through the bounce, so this isn't a leverage-fueled move yet.
My read: as long as 8.40 holds, I think $AVAX drifts up to the 8.88 POC and probably pokes into that 9.3 short cluster. A 4h close back under 8.30 kills that idea and puts 8.0 back on the table.
Do you think those shorts around 9.3 get squeezed this week, or does 8.3 break first?
NFA, just my read 📈
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#AVAX #Avalanche #NanoTrading
$AVAX bounced from the 7.99 wick earlier this week and has been grinding back up. It's at 8.50 now, after a 24h range of 8.18 to 8.64, and the last few 4h candles keep holding above 8.40.
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the liquidation map is lopsided. The big clusters are all overhead: roughly $67M around 9.3, $62M near 9.6 and $44M near 9.9. Below price there's a dense band from 8.5 down to 8.3, but nothing that size. The volume POC sits up near 8.88, so price is still trading under value.
Futures positioning is long but not stretched. About 60% of accounts are long (L/S 1.52), top traders are about 70% long, and funding is only around 0.006%. OI has been flat at roughly $73-75M through the bounce, so this isn't a leverage-fueled move yet.
My read: as long as 8.40 holds, I think $AVAX drifts up to the 8.88 POC and probably pokes into that 9.3 short cluster. A 4h close back under 8.30 kills that idea and puts 8.0 back on the table.
Do you think those shorts around 9.3 get squeezed this week, or does 8.3 break first?
NFA, just my read 📈
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#AVAX #Avalanche #NanoTrading
On the NanoTrading Fire chart (4h) the liquidation map is lopsided. The big clusters are all overhead: roughly $67M around 9.3, $62M near 9.6 and $44M near 9.9. Below price there's a dense band from 8.5 down to 8.3, but nothing that size. The volume POC sits up near 8.88, so price is still trading under value.
Futures positioning is long but not stretched. About 60% of accounts are long (L/S 1.52), top traders are about 70% long, and funding is only around 0.006%. OI has been flat at roughly $73-75M through the bounce, so this isn't a leverage-fueled move yet.
My read: as long as 8.40 holds, I think $AVAX drifts up to the 8.88 POC and probably pokes into that 9.3 short cluster. A 4h close back under 8.30 kills that idea and puts 8.0 back on the table.
Do you think those shorts around 9.3 get squeezed this week, or does 8.3 break first?
NFA, just my read 📈
Source: NanoTrading Fire chart (nanotradingclub.xyz)
#AVAX #Avalanche #NanoTrading
X⁷_Vll:
HOLD it
1
2
927
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
1
#BinanceUpdatesProofofReservesAddresses
75 views
30 Discussing
2
#BinanceToResumePhaseOneOfWithdrawals
9,910 views
379 Discussing
3
#BinanceHadAlreadyCovered$6BofHackLoss
1,686 views
53 Discussing
4
#FBIConfirmsNorthKoreaIsResponsibleForBinanceCryptoHack
11,030 views
59 Discussing
5
#BinanceSAFUFundTransferCompleted7499BTC
79,241 views
1,345 Discussing
6
#CZDismissesClaimsBinanceHackWasPredicted
2,685 views
102 Discussing
7
#BinanceRecovery90% of stolen assets
211,666 views
224 Discussing
8
#YiHe:ProofOfReserves:10TokensAt100%Backing
187,973 views
1,120 Discussing
9
#BackedNotBroken:RichardTengSaysUsersBearNoLoss
65,959 views
693 Discussing
10
#B14gReportsUnauthorizedTransferOfAbout97MCORE
5,226 views
133 Discussing