Binance Square

Htp96

image
Verified Creator
Open Trade
BNB Holder
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
7.6 Years
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
87 Following
22.8K+ Followers
10.7K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
All Content
Portfolio
PINNED
--
See original
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissionsCurrently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done. READ NOW Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve. Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.

Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions

Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW

Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
--
Bullish
See original
$ETH IS ETHEREUM BEING UNDERVALUED WITH POTENTIAL I am wondering whether Ethereum is truly being undervalued, especially when looking at the increasing gap between price and on-chain data. Since the beginning of 2025 until now, $ETH has decreased by about 12%, while stocks, gold, and even BTC have performed better. If you only look at the chart, it is easy to conclude that Ethereum is losing its appeal. However, my experience in building and using the ecosystem tells a different story. Ethereum remains the central payment layer for global dollar liquidity. Every day, around 90–100 billion USD in stablecoins, mainly USDT and USDC, are traded on the Ethereum mainnet. No other network achieves this scale. With significant capital inflow, what matters is not the fees, but the trust, neutrality, and certainty in payments. When real money moves, Ethereum remains the default choice. What catches my attention the most is the behavior of large investors. ETH is trading close to the cost price of long-term accumulation addresses. Unrealized profits are almost zero, but the flow of ETH into these wallets is still increasing. In previous cycles, this is often the stage where smart money quietly builds positions. Therefore, instead of asking when the price will bounce back, I lean more towards the possibility that Ethereum is being structurally undervalued by the market. #ETH
$ETH IS ETHEREUM BEING UNDERVALUED WITH POTENTIAL

I am wondering whether Ethereum is truly being undervalued, especially when looking at the increasing gap between price and on-chain data.

Since the beginning of 2025 until now, $ETH has decreased by about 12%, while stocks, gold, and even BTC have performed better.

If you only look at the chart, it is easy to conclude that Ethereum is losing its appeal. However, my experience in building and using the ecosystem tells a different story.

Ethereum remains the central payment layer for global dollar liquidity. Every day, around 90–100 billion USD in stablecoins, mainly USDT and USDC, are traded on the Ethereum mainnet. No other network achieves this scale.

With significant capital inflow, what matters is not the fees, but the trust, neutrality, and certainty in payments. When real money moves, Ethereum remains the default choice.

What catches my attention the most is the behavior of large investors. ETH is trading close to the cost price of long-term accumulation addresses. Unrealized profits are almost zero, but the flow of ETH into these wallets is still increasing.

In previous cycles, this is often the stage where smart money quietly builds positions. Therefore, instead of asking when the price will bounce back, I lean more towards the possibility that Ethereum is being structurally undervalued by the market.
#ETH
See original
The development roadmap of APRO and important milestones When I look at the development roadmap of APRO, I do not see it as a traditional roadmap with dry technical milestones. What I care more about is how APRO chooses the pace of development, and which milestones are truly significant for the long-term viability of the protocol. In DeFi, many roadmaps look very nice on paper, but are built for a constantly rising market. APRO gives me the opposite feeling: their roadmap is built with the assumption that the market will continuously challenge the system.

The development roadmap of APRO and important milestones



When I look at the development roadmap of APRO, I do not see it as a traditional roadmap with dry technical milestones.
What I care more about is how APRO chooses the pace of development, and which milestones are truly significant for the long-term viability of the protocol.
In DeFi, many roadmaps look very nice on paper, but are built for a constantly rising market.
APRO gives me the opposite feeling: their roadmap is built with the assumption that the market will continuously challenge the system.
--
Bullish
See original
The 4-year cycle of Bitcoin is showing clear signs of fracture. After the 2024 halving, instead of entering the familiar growth phase as in history, $BTC decreased by about 7% in the first year. This indicates that the cycle model, once seen as a 'natural law', may no longer operate as before. In my opinion, the reason does not lie in Bitcoin weakening, but in the changing structure of the market. The influx of ETF capital and the direct participation of large institutions are overshadowing the role of supply shock – a factor that has become too predictable and largely priced in by the market early on. When halving is no longer a surprising catalyst, the cyclical reflex also loses strength. Thus, the market may be moving away from the traditional boom-bust model towards a different state: longer-term growth, linked to macro liquidity and real cash flow. Bitcoin is no longer a young asset merely following the halving rhythm, but is getting closer to the role of a global macro asset. For me, this is a phase that requires a shift in mindset. Instead of waiting for a bull run like in the past, I focus on understanding where Bitcoin is positioned in the long-term picture, and patiently build a position suitable for a more mature cycle. #BTC
The 4-year cycle of Bitcoin is showing clear signs of fracture.

After the 2024 halving, instead of entering the familiar growth phase as in history, $BTC decreased by about 7% in the first year. This indicates that the cycle model, once seen as a 'natural law', may no longer operate as before.

In my opinion, the reason does not lie in Bitcoin weakening, but in the changing structure of the market. The influx of ETF capital and the direct participation of large institutions are overshadowing the role of supply shock – a factor that has become too predictable and largely priced in by the market early on.

When halving is no longer a surprising catalyst, the cyclical reflex also loses strength. Thus, the market may be moving away from the traditional boom-bust model towards a different state: longer-term growth, linked to macro liquidity and real cash flow.

Bitcoin is no longer a young asset merely following the halving rhythm, but is getting closer to the role of a global macro asset.

For me, this is a phase that requires a shift in mindset. Instead of waiting for a bull run like in the past, I focus on understanding where Bitcoin is positioned in the long-term picture, and patiently build a position suitable for a more mature cycle.
#BTC
See original
How Lorenzo Protocol controls token inflation In DeFi, token inflation is almost the price that most protocols have to pay for initial growth. But the problem is that many projects are used to living off inflation, and when the market deteriorates, there is no way to stand on their own. When looking at the Lorenzo Protocol, what caught my attention was not how many tokens they issued, but that they intentionally did not place tokens at the center of growth.

How Lorenzo Protocol controls token inflation



In DeFi, token inflation is almost the price that most protocols have to pay for initial growth.
But the problem is that many projects are used to living off inflation, and when the market deteriorates, there is no way to stand on their own.
When looking at the Lorenzo Protocol, what caught my attention was not how many tokens they issued, but that they intentionally did not place tokens at the center of growth.
See original
Analyzing the Flow of Value in the Falcon Finance Ecosystem When analyzing a DeFi protocol in the current phase, I think the most important question is not 'how does the token appreciate', but rather where the real value is flowing. In a bull market, the flow of value is often obscured by narratives and price expectations. But when the market is sideways or weak, there is only one thing that can be analyzed clearly: the real flow of value in the system. Falcon Finance, in my opinion, is a quite interesting case to dissect from this perspective.

Analyzing the Flow of Value in the Falcon Finance Ecosystem



When analyzing a DeFi protocol in the current phase, I think the most important question is not 'how does the token appreciate', but rather where the real value is flowing.
In a bull market, the flow of value is often obscured by narratives and price expectations. But when the market is sideways or weak, there is only one thing that can be analyzed clearly: the real flow of value in the system.
Falcon Finance, in my opinion, is a quite interesting case to dissect from this perspective.
See original
The development orientation of Apro in the next 2-3 years If we look back at most DeFi protocols that emerged during the 2020-2021 period, it is easy to see a clear common point: the majority were designed to take advantage of the bull market, not to survive in the long term. When market conditions change, initial assumptions are quickly broken, leading to the model no longer holding up. @APRO-Oracle In my opinion, they are heading in a different direction. The development orientation of APRO in the next 2-3 years reflects quite clearly that they are not building for a specific cycle, but for a prolonged market state, full of uncertainties and unpredictability. This is a fundamental difference, not just a difference in short-term strategy.

The development orientation of Apro in the next 2-3 years



If we look back at most DeFi protocols that emerged during the 2020-2021 period, it is easy to see a clear common point: the majority were designed to take advantage of the bull market, not to survive in the long term.
When market conditions change, initial assumptions are quickly broken, leading to the model no longer holding up.
@APRO Oracle In my opinion, they are heading in a different direction. The development orientation of APRO in the next 2-3 years reflects quite clearly that they are not building for a specific cycle, but for a prolonged market state, full of uncertainties and unpredictability. This is a fundamental difference, not just a difference in short-term strategy.
See original
How the Lorenzo Protocol handles yield volatility When I think about the Lorenzo Protocol and the question 'how do they handle yield volatility', I realize this is a very practical question, and also very difficult. Because in DeFi, yield volatility is not an unusual incident, but the default state. Yield rises quickly, falls quickly, disappears, then reappears elsewhere. Most of the previous protocols did not actually 'handle' yield volatility, but only reacted to it, often by pushing additional incentives or hastily changing strategies.

How the Lorenzo Protocol handles yield volatility



When I think about the Lorenzo Protocol and the question 'how do they handle yield volatility', I realize this is a very practical question, and also very difficult.
Because in DeFi, yield volatility is not an unusual incident, but the default state.
Yield rises quickly, falls quickly, disappears, then reappears elsewhere.
Most of the previous protocols did not actually 'handle' yield volatility, but only reacted to it, often by pushing additional incentives or hastily changing strategies.
See original
What has Falcon Finance learned from the previous DeFi crashes? When I look at Falcon Finance and ask the question, 'What have they learned from the previous DeFi crashes?', I don't think this is a nostalgic question. For me, this is the core question to evaluate whether a protocol has the ability to survive or not. DeFi is not lacking in good ideas, nor is it lacking in strong technical teams. What DeFi always lacks is the ability to learn from its own failures.

What has Falcon Finance learned from the previous DeFi crashes?



When I look at Falcon Finance and ask the question, 'What have they learned from the previous DeFi crashes?', I don't think this is a nostalgic question.
For me, this is the core question to evaluate whether a protocol has the ability to survive or not. DeFi is not lacking in good ideas, nor is it lacking in strong technical teams. What DeFi always lacks is the ability to learn from its own failures.
See original
Ethereum aims for the 3,000 dollar target after sharply dropping to 2,800 dollarsEthereum is attracting attention as the price sharply drops to the 2,800 USD range, a correction that unsettles market sentiment in the short term but also helps to alleviate excess leverage. For me, this is a fairly familiar scenario in crypto cycles: such reset phases often pave the way for more sustainable upward trends. As selling pressure gradually weakens, the big question for the market returns to whether $ETH can regain momentum towards the 3,000 USD mark or not.

Ethereum aims for the 3,000 dollar target after sharply dropping to 2,800 dollars

Ethereum is attracting attention as the price sharply drops to the 2,800 USD range, a correction that unsettles market sentiment in the short term but also helps to alleviate excess leverage.
For me, this is a fairly familiar scenario in crypto cycles: such reset phases often pave the way for more sustainable upward trends. As selling pressure gradually weakens, the big question for the market returns to whether $ETH can regain momentum towards the 3,000 USD mark or not.
See original
How Apro limits reflexivity risk in tokenomics@APRO-Oracle #APRO $AT When I talk about reflexivity risk in tokenomics, I always feel this is one of the most dangerous issues that is rarely addressed directly in DeFi. Many projects collapse not because of poor technology or useless products, but because their tokens self-amplify expectations and then drag the entire system down. When looking at Apro, what catches my attention is not that they completely 'avoid' reflexivity because that is almost impossible, but rather how they proactively limit it right from the design.

How Apro limits reflexivity risk in tokenomics

@APRO Oracle #APRO $AT
When I talk about reflexivity risk in tokenomics, I always feel this is one of the most dangerous issues that is rarely addressed directly in DeFi. Many projects collapse not because of poor technology or useless products, but because their tokens self-amplify expectations and then drag the entire system down.
When looking at Apro, what catches my attention is not that they completely 'avoid' reflexivity because that is almost impossible, but rather how they proactively limit it right from the design.
See original
Bitcoin oscillates around 90,000 USD, analysts still expect the 100,000 USD markI am closely monitoring Bitcoin during this period and can see that the expectation for BTC to reach the 100,000 USD mark is still very strong, even though the current price does not show a clear breakout. In recent days, the market has mainly fluctuated in the range of 88,000–90,000 USD and has continuously failed to challenge the 90,000 USD mark, indicating that the market is in a state of accumulation and waiting for new signals. From my perspective, the sideways movement of prices combined with a sharp decline in trading volume reflects a cautious sentiment, especially as institutional money shows signs of withdrawal.

Bitcoin oscillates around 90,000 USD, analysts still expect the 100,000 USD mark

I am closely monitoring Bitcoin during this period and can see that the expectation for BTC to reach the 100,000 USD mark is still very strong, even though the current price does not show a clear breakout.
In recent days, the market has mainly fluctuated in the range of 88,000–90,000 USD and has continuously failed to challenge the 90,000 USD mark, indicating that the market is in a state of accumulation and waiting for new signals.
From my perspective, the sideways movement of prices combined with a sharp decline in trading volume reflects a cautious sentiment, especially as institutional money shows signs of withdrawal.
See original
Lorenzo Protocol and the sustainable approach to DeFi When talking about Lorenzo Protocol and the sustainable approach to DeFi, I think the most important thing is not how many more products Lorenzo can make or how much TVL they can attract in the short term, but the foundational assumptions they choose from the very beginning. Lorenzo does not start with the question 'how to grow the fastest', but with a much harder question: if DeFi continues to expand, if the capital scale increases many times over, how should this system be designed so that it does not collapse on itself?

Lorenzo Protocol and the sustainable approach to DeFi


When talking about Lorenzo Protocol and the sustainable approach to DeFi, I think the most important thing is not how many more products Lorenzo can make or how much TVL they can attract in the short term, but the foundational assumptions they choose from the very beginning.
Lorenzo does not start with the question 'how to grow the fastest', but with a much harder question: if DeFi continues to expand, if the capital scale increases many times over, how should this system be designed so that it does not collapse on itself?
--
Bullish
See original
🟢 ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL OF THE PROJECT Lorenzo Protocol @LorenzoProtocol is an on-chain asset management platform built with a clear goal: to bring institutional-level profit-generating products to the blockchain in a more accessible and flexible way for users. The most outstanding point I see in the project is the mechanism of issuing profitable tokens with liquidity. Instead of users having to lock up capital or directly participate in complex strategies. Lorenzo $BANK allows holding a token representing a position and stream of profit, which can be traded or exited at any time. Another strength is how Lorenzo aggregates profits from various sources. The project is not only limited to DeFi but also expands into CeFi and real-world assets (RWA). Bringing RWA on-chain helps create real cash flow, more stable, and reduces dependency on purely DeFi yield models that are prone to volatility. All profits are recorded and transparently distributed on the blockchain, helping users track and verify easily. For me, Lorenzo is like an intermediary layer that simplifies access to complex yields while maintaining liquidity, transparency, and long-term scalability. @LorenzoProtocol #lorenzoprotocol $BANK
🟢 ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL OF THE PROJECT Lorenzo Protocol

@Lorenzo Protocol is an on-chain asset management platform built with a clear goal: to bring institutional-level profit-generating products to the blockchain in a more accessible and flexible way for users.

The most outstanding point I see in the project is the mechanism of issuing profitable tokens with liquidity.

Instead of users having to lock up capital or directly participate in complex strategies.

Lorenzo $BANK allows holding a token representing a position and stream of profit, which can be traded or exited at any time.

Another strength is how Lorenzo aggregates profits from various sources.

The project is not only limited to DeFi but also expands into CeFi and real-world assets (RWA). Bringing RWA on-chain helps create real cash flow, more stable, and reduces dependency on purely DeFi yield models that are prone to volatility.

All profits are recorded and transparently distributed on the blockchain, helping users track and verify easily.

For me, Lorenzo is like an intermediary layer that simplifies access to complex yields while maintaining liquidity, transparency, and long-term scalability.
@Lorenzo Protocol #lorenzoprotocol $BANK
--
Bullish
See original
🚨 UPDATE JAMES WYNN JUST CLOSED SHORT ORDER VIA LONG Young man James Wynn has closed his short order $BTC with a profit of 21k. This is a rare occasion for this whale to win in this round. After closing the short, this whale opened a long order $BTC 40x on 14.46 BTC. If the price drops sharply to the 87k area, this whale will officially be liquidated from the market. I will follow and update the latest information for everyone. #BTC
🚨 UPDATE JAMES WYNN JUST CLOSED SHORT ORDER VIA LONG

Young man James Wynn has closed his short order $BTC with a profit of 21k. This is a rare occasion for this whale to win in this round.

After closing the short, this whale opened a long order $BTC 40x on 14.46 BTC. If the price drops sharply to the 87k area, this whale will officially be liquidated from the market.

I will follow and update the latest information for everyone.
#BTC
BTCUSDT
Opening Long
Unrealized PNL
+17.00%
--
Bullish
See original
UPDATE INFORMATION Michael Saylor The possibility of buying more Bitcoin. Saylor's brother recently posted the possibility of buying an additional $BTC , currently, the price of Bitcoin is hovering around 87k9 folks. In nearly 2 weeks, Saylor has accumulated ~$2B in Bitcoin and may accumulate even more this week, but it’s still uncertain how much $BTC . However, every time Saylor DCA's Bitcoin, there will be a wave before the new, but after the new, the market adjusts, so those who are trading long or short should pay attention. BTC also has a liquidity zone of 94k-95k; this area has quite a bit of liquidity that hasn’t been lapped yet, I’m waiting for a CME gap in this region, so the chance of it being lapped is quite high. #BTC
UPDATE INFORMATION Michael Saylor The possibility of buying more Bitcoin.

Saylor's brother recently posted the possibility of buying an additional $BTC , currently, the price of Bitcoin is hovering around 87k9 folks.

In nearly 2 weeks, Saylor has accumulated ~$2B in Bitcoin and may accumulate even more this week, but it’s still uncertain how much $BTC .

However, every time Saylor DCA's Bitcoin, there will be a wave before the new, but after the new, the market adjusts, so those who are trading long or short should pay attention.

BTC also has a liquidity zone of 94k-95k; this area has quite a bit of liquidity that hasn’t been lapped yet, I’m waiting for a CME gap in this region, so the chance of it being lapped is quite high.

#BTC
BTCUSDT
Opening Long
Unrealized PNL
+16.00%
See original
Falcon Finance and the design approach for bad markets before good markets When looking at Falcon Finance, I always have the feeling that this is a project designed with a very different assumption compared to most previous DeFi: a bad market is not an exception, but the default state that needs to be prepared for. Instead of building a product with the question 'what if everything goes well?', Falcon starts from the opposite question: if the market deteriorates, liquidity is withdrawn, and confidence declines, can this system still stand?

Falcon Finance and the design approach for bad markets before good markets



When looking at Falcon Finance, I always have the feeling that this is a project designed with a very different assumption compared to most previous DeFi: a bad market is not an exception, but the default state that needs to be prepared for.
Instead of building a product with the question 'what if everything goes well?', Falcon starts from the opposite question: if the market deteriorates, liquidity is withdrawn, and confidence declines, can this system still stand?
See original
The role of Apro in standardizing on-chain capital flow When talking about standardizing on-chain capital flow, I think this is one of the biggest challenges that DeFi must solve if it wants to enter a stage of maturity. For many years, DeFi has developed very quickly, but in a rather spontaneous way. the continuous flow of capital into new protocols, new strategies, new products, while lacking a common standard for how capital is used, measuring risk, and operating over time.

The role of Apro in standardizing on-chain capital flow



When talking about standardizing on-chain capital flow, I think this is one of the biggest challenges that DeFi must solve if it wants to enter a stage of maturity. For many years, DeFi has developed very quickly, but in a rather spontaneous way.
the continuous flow of capital into new protocols, new strategies, new products, while lacking a common standard for how capital is used, measuring risk, and operating over time.
--
Bullish
See original
BREAKING NEW : A WHALE HAS CLOSED A SHORT POSITION $BTC While the market has no volume, a whale has opened a short position $BTC four times since March 2025 and has just reduced an additional 20 BTC in the short position 20 minutes ago, locking in a profit of 465,000 USD. Currently, this whale still holds 550.7 $BTC in its short position, equivalent to 48.6 M. This whale still has 12.8 million USD that has not been closed while incurring a total transaction fee of 9.6 million USD. In total, the cumulative profit of the account has exceeded 55.51 million USD. Indeed, although the market is weak, many whales are still feeding heavily. I will follow and monitor this whale's wallet and update you as soon as possible. #BTC
BREAKING NEW : A WHALE HAS CLOSED A SHORT POSITION $BTC

While the market has no volume, a whale has opened a short position $BTC four times since March 2025 and has just reduced an additional 20 BTC in the short position 20 minutes ago, locking in a profit of 465,000 USD.

Currently, this whale still holds 550.7 $BTC in its short position, equivalent to 48.6 M.

This whale still has 12.8 million USD that has not been closed while incurring a total transaction fee of 9.6 million USD. In total, the cumulative profit of the account has exceeded 55.51 million USD.
Indeed, although the market is weak, many whales are still feeding heavily.

I will follow and monitor this whale's wallet and update you as soon as possible.
#BTC
BTCUSDT
Opening Long
Unrealized PNL
+16.00%
See original
Lorenzo Protocol and the problem of separating yield – risk In DeFi, yield and risk almost always go hand in hand. High yield often corresponds to high risk, while low risk results in compressed yield. In a bull market, this relationship is blurred by rising prices and new capital inflows. But when the market slows down, the real question emerges: who is bearing the risk, and who is benefiting from the yield. In my opinion, Lorenzo Protocol appears to solve a very core problem that has been poorly addressed: separating yield and risk into different layers, rather than forcing all users to accept an 'all-in-one' package.

Lorenzo Protocol and the problem of separating yield – risk



In DeFi, yield and risk almost always go hand in hand. High yield often corresponds to high risk, while low risk results in compressed yield. In a bull market, this relationship is blurred by rising prices and new capital inflows.
But when the market slows down, the real question emerges: who is bearing the risk, and who is benefiting from the yield.
In my opinion, Lorenzo Protocol appears to solve a very core problem that has been poorly addressed: separating yield and risk into different layers, rather than forcing all users to accept an 'all-in-one' package.
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

Krypto Dragon
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs