90% of CT may have underestimated how well BNB Memes have performed this cycle, myself included.
After taking another look at BSC, I think $MUBARAK deserves a closer look.
Read this thread and you’ll know what I’m looking at next.
Every cycle produces one or two phenomenal Memes. Last cycle, $PEPE was a perfect example.
I went back and compared PEPE with MUBARAK, and the setup looks more than just a random pump:
1. The chart structure looks like early PEPE
MUBARAK went through a massive pump, a deep retracement, and a long period of consolidation before becoming active again. PEPE went through a similar phase early on, and the two price structures look remarkably similar.
2. Concentrated supply
Around 667.62M MUBARAK is held in cold wallets, representing 66.70% of the total supply.
If these tokens remain inactive, the actual liquid supply could be much smaller than the total supply. The less supply available to trade, the more explosive the price action can become.
3. A powerful CZ narrative
CZ’s influence across the BNB ecosystem speaks for itself. His profile-picture change previously triggered a significant move in MUBARAK, followed by multiple interactions with the community.
This cycle’s $BNB Meme could very well be MUBARAK, the next $10B Meme. #MUBARAK #bnb #MEME
RARE recently received a Binance Monitoring Tag, and because of that, many traders started selling spot and opening short positions on futures, expecting the price to fall.
But this is where the market psychology gets interesting. When traders keep selling spot and opening shorts because they expect a dump, that short pressure can sometimes become fuel for the opposite move. If RARE keeps moving higher, those shorts can come under pressure and may start closing their positions.
In the Long/Short Statistics, we can see around 51% of traders are short, while around 49% are long on the short-term timeframes.
Another thing I’m watching is Open Interest. We can see OI around $12.4M, up around 496% in the last 24 hours. That’s a huge increase, showing that a lot of new positions have entered the market.Volume is also increasing strongly, showing that trading activity around RARE has picked up significantly.
And there’s another thing I noticed on the whale order chart. We can see two major buying activities already happened, and both times the price moved higher after those big buys came in. This suggests that larger buyers are still active around RARE. Funding is also heavily negative, around -1.14% on Binance and -1.30% on Bybit, showing that the short side is quite aggressive.
So, when we put everything together, we’re seeing heavy short positioning, a massive increase in OI, rising volume, and strong whale buying activity. That’s why I think RaRE is pumping.
Sui lending rates don’t sit still.. Last week Navi looked fine. This week the incentive is somewhere else. Next week liquidity thins and the “good rate” you screenshot is already stale.
Most people still treat lending like a savings account: pick one venue, deposit, forget it. On Sui that habit quietly costs you.
Not because you picked the wrong protocol. Because the rate moved and you didn’t.
That’s the only real difference I see in @Haedal Protocol Lending Vault
It is not “another place to park SUI.” You deposit SUI, USDC, or haSUI once and get an LP token for your share. Under the hood the vault can move across Navi, Suilend, Scallop, Current, AlphaFi, with Cetus as a buffer. The point is not the logo list. The point is the job: watch rate, liquidity, and incentive intensity, then reallocate when the market shifts.
If you deposit into Navi yourself, you are the strategy. You check dashboards. You bridge attention between five apps. You claim rewards. You eat gas and timing lag. By the time you move, the boost already rotated.
A vault that doesn’t move with rates is just a wrapper. A vault that does is closer to how Sui lending actually behaves: noisy, incentive-driven, week-to-week.
I’m not saying set-and-forget is magic. Allocation can lag. A venue can look hot and still be thin. You still take lending-market risk. Read the product, size it like a tool, not a promise.
But if you already understand Haedal from staking and haSUI, this fits the same logic: don’t lock capital into one static seat. Let it stay liquid enough to follow the better seat.
I just took a look at $NEAR chart and immediately saw a perfect similar Structure to $ADA 2018-2021 Cycle 🤔
Although market share won't be the same, and the number of coins now far exceeds what it was in 2021, if NEAR can pull something truly revolutionary, I think we might see it pull off the same run ADA did in 2021.
- @Ondo tokenized US stocks & ETFs on https://near.com - $NEAR on Hyperliquid spot -Confidential TVL > $100M -Limit orders live on NEAR Intents -Bitwise NEAR Staking ETP > $100M AUM -700K+ NEAR staked for private inference
If it breaks past this sell wall, the major resistance will be eliminated.