易道千元
High-Frequency Trader
2.3 Years
所有的开仓，都是基于你对自己必赢的假设。只有基于以上基础假设逻辑，才能不断修改自己的大模型！
138 Following
145 Followers
141 Liked
14 Shared
All
Quotes
Videos
Translate
中国赢学
Why do we say that when the US military abducts Maduro, the ultimate winner is still Chinese oil companies? If you don't believe it, just look at an old news story to see the truth!
On January 3, 2026, at dawn, US special forces forcibly removed Maduro and his wife from the country. The incident shocked the world. On the surface, it appears that the US has regained control over the nation with the world's largest proven oil reserves—Venezuela's confirmed oil reserves reach 30.38 billion barrels, far exceeding those of Saudi Arabia and Russia.
The White House immediately announced that US oil companies would lead the restoration of the country's aging oil fields and fully take over its energy infrastructure.
Is that really the case? Dao Ge insists: just watch closely—the one that will ultimately profit steadily may not be US oil companies, but Chinese oil companies.
If you don't believe it, then take a look at an old news item—on January 1, 2024, in the southern part of Iraq, the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) officially took over the lead role from ExxonMobil of the United States, becoming the largest operator and shareholder of the massive West Qurna 1 oilfield.
West Qurna 1 is one of Iraq's largest and globally most important heavy crude oil production zones, with a daily production capacity exceeding 400,000 barrels. When the US invaded Iraq, the official justification was counter-terrorism and eliminating weapons of mass destruction, but in reality, it deeply intervened in the country's energy system. ExxonMobil secured the project's leadership in 2009, seen as a strategic foothold for the US to re-enter the core of Middle Eastern energy. However, less than 15 years later, this company, once a symbol of American energy dominance, voluntarily withdrew and handed over the project to China.
Why? The reason is very practical: although the West Qurna oilfield has high output, it produces heavy, high-sulfur crude oil, which involves high extraction and transportation costs, a long investment recovery period, and persistently unstable security conditions in Iraq. In contrast, US domestic shale oil is quick, simple, and offers fast returns, so capital naturally flows back home.
Chinese oil companies, however, operate under a completely different logic. Backed by national strategy, they pursue long-term, stable resource security and RMB settlement channels, rather than short-term profit maximization. More importantly, China has a complete refining and processing system capable of efficiently handling heavy crude oil—exactly the type of oil Venezuela possesses.
Major US oil companies, including Chevron, have repeatedly stated they are unwilling to return to Venezuela—citing reasons such as "too high risk, poor infrastructure, and low return on investment." This is precisely why we say: even if the US military abducts Maduro, the ultimate winner remains Chinese oil companies. A news report from early 2024 about the oilfield handover already contained the answer.
On January 3, 2026, at dawn, US special forces forcibly removed Maduro and his wife from the country. The incident shocked the world. On the surface, it appears that the US has regained control over the nation with the world's largest proven oil reserves—Venezuela's confirmed oil reserves reach 30.38 billion barrels, far exceeding those of Saudi Arabia and Russia.
The White House immediately announced that US oil companies would lead the restoration of the country's aging oil fields and fully take over its energy infrastructure.
Is that really the case? Dao Ge insists: just watch closely—the one that will ultimately profit steadily may not be US oil companies, but Chinese oil companies.
If you don't believe it, then take a look at an old news item—on January 1, 2024, in the southern part of Iraq, the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) officially took over the lead role from ExxonMobil of the United States, becoming the largest operator and shareholder of the massive West Qurna 1 oilfield.
West Qurna 1 is one of Iraq's largest and globally most important heavy crude oil production zones, with a daily production capacity exceeding 400,000 barrels. When the US invaded Iraq, the official justification was counter-terrorism and eliminating weapons of mass destruction, but in reality, it deeply intervened in the country's energy system. ExxonMobil secured the project's leadership in 2009, seen as a strategic foothold for the US to re-enter the core of Middle Eastern energy. However, less than 15 years later, this company, once a symbol of American energy dominance, voluntarily withdrew and handed over the project to China.
Why? The reason is very practical: although the West Qurna oilfield has high output, it produces heavy, high-sulfur crude oil, which involves high extraction and transportation costs, a long investment recovery period, and persistently unstable security conditions in Iraq. In contrast, US domestic shale oil is quick, simple, and offers fast returns, so capital naturally flows back home.
Chinese oil companies, however, operate under a completely different logic. Backed by national strategy, they pursue long-term, stable resource security and RMB settlement channels, rather than short-term profit maximization. More importantly, China has a complete refining and processing system capable of efficiently handling heavy crude oil—exactly the type of oil Venezuela possesses.
Major US oil companies, including Chevron, have repeatedly stated they are unwilling to return to Venezuela—citing reasons such as "too high risk, poor infrastructure, and low return on investment." This is precisely why we say: even if the US military abducts Maduro, the ultimate winner remains Chinese oil companies. A news report from early 2024 about the oilfield handover already contained the answer.
Translate
陈志回国了“回国了”
Cars are parked all over the street of Qinghua Garden School in Xincai, Henan, and the scene is completely surrounded by special police officers.
See original
Not a responsible major country
Iran and Venezuela are not normal countries; they just sell resources to the major Eastern buyer and rely militarily on Russia.
1. Because there are basically no other major buyers, some sanctioned countries sell 70%-90% of their oil to the East, which has the capacity to absorb it. This is the core relationship—resource sellers and a major buyer. Iran and Venezuela, recently targeted by the U.S., do not have particularly special relations with China, nor are they allies. Additionally, China has exceptionally strong engineering and construction capabilities, undertaking projects in many countries worldwide, including those under sanctions. For example, when Libya had its crisis, many Chinese engineering teams were working there and needed evacuation.
2. The main areas are resources and engineering. Besides Pakistan, which stands out, there are basically no countries with large-scale military cooperation with China. Without Pakistan's major contracts, China's arms exports would be minimal, even less than South Korea's. It's common to see news about some country showing interest in Chinese weapons—this is merely 'tactical engagement' and rarely results in substantial orders. Countries under U.S. sanctions don't buy much from China; instead, Middle Eastern wealthy nations sometimes spend freely.
3. For example, Venezuela's total arms imports from 2006 to 2013 amounted to $8.305 billion, with China accounting for less than $1 billion—only 11%—far below Russia's $6.433 billion. Later rumors suggested Venezuela would significantly increase purchases from China, but nothing came of it, and the weapons weren't used during the crisis. Iran is similar: during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, Iran urgently bought weapons from everywhere, including China, but that didn't constitute a special relationship. Even during the war, over 70% of Iran's weapons came from the former Soviet Union, and China's sales were just supplementary—only a few hundred million dollars. Later, Iran consistently relied on Russian weapons, with very limited purchases from China. Especially after 2010, when Iran faced UN arms embargoes and again after the 2015 nuclear deal, China respected international resolutions, while Russia continued selling weapons to Iran without regard. China's arms exports to Iran have been minimal, accounting for only 1% of total exports since 2015.
4. In fact, internationally, China's military strength has always been seen as far behind Russia's. Countries sanctioned by the U.S. mainly develop military ties with Russia, which treats this as a revenue-generating opportunity. Chinese military enthusiasts only began to understand the 'real' state of Russia's military after the Russia-Ukraine conflict—before that, many tended to overestimate it. Claims that China's weapons are the best in the world, even surpassing those of the U.S., are only recently emerging with new evidence from 2025. In some branch-specific military rankings, China even ranks behind India. China itself doesn't place much emphasis on arms exports; while other exports are thriving, China's domestic weapons production is already sufficient, making exports not a priority. Fortunately, China has a long-term cooperation mechanism with Pakistan. However, Pakistan still admires U.S. weapons—when it acquired the J-10C in 2022, it was Prime Minister Imran Khan who, in 2021, overruled opposition and personally approved the deal and presided over its induction ceremony, later being thanked by the public while in prison.
5. Therefore, when the U.S. and Israel conduct military strikes on Iran and Middle Eastern forces, or when the U.S. targets Venezuela, the main loser is Russia. China has sold very few weapons to these countries, and they weren't particularly interested anyway—any chance was missed. No country has ever relied on Chinese weapons; it's never happened. Only Pakistan was pleasantly surprised and felt they gained a great deal. Whether Iran or Venezuela suffer heavily from U.S. or Israeli attacks, it has nothing to do with China. It might even reflect the failure of Russian weapons, but China has no reason to worry.
6. The U.S. and Israel's military actions in the Middle East and Latin America create instability abroad, but they have no direct impact on China. Some Chinese experts and citizens sometimes feel sympathy or hope for countries targeted by the U.S., hoping they resist effectively. For example, when the U.S. invaded Iraq, Chinese public opinion expected a strong resistance. But one should not get overly emotionally involved—these are other countries' affairs, and they don't hold China in particularly high regard anyway.
1. Because there are basically no other major buyers, some sanctioned countries sell 70%-90% of their oil to the East, which has the capacity to absorb it. This is the core relationship—resource sellers and a major buyer. Iran and Venezuela, recently targeted by the U.S., do not have particularly special relations with China, nor are they allies. Additionally, China has exceptionally strong engineering and construction capabilities, undertaking projects in many countries worldwide, including those under sanctions. For example, when Libya had its crisis, many Chinese engineering teams were working there and needed evacuation.
2. The main areas are resources and engineering. Besides Pakistan, which stands out, there are basically no countries with large-scale military cooperation with China. Without Pakistan's major contracts, China's arms exports would be minimal, even less than South Korea's. It's common to see news about some country showing interest in Chinese weapons—this is merely 'tactical engagement' and rarely results in substantial orders. Countries under U.S. sanctions don't buy much from China; instead, Middle Eastern wealthy nations sometimes spend freely.
3. For example, Venezuela's total arms imports from 2006 to 2013 amounted to $8.305 billion, with China accounting for less than $1 billion—only 11%—far below Russia's $6.433 billion. Later rumors suggested Venezuela would significantly increase purchases from China, but nothing came of it, and the weapons weren't used during the crisis. Iran is similar: during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, Iran urgently bought weapons from everywhere, including China, but that didn't constitute a special relationship. Even during the war, over 70% of Iran's weapons came from the former Soviet Union, and China's sales were just supplementary—only a few hundred million dollars. Later, Iran consistently relied on Russian weapons, with very limited purchases from China. Especially after 2010, when Iran faced UN arms embargoes and again after the 2015 nuclear deal, China respected international resolutions, while Russia continued selling weapons to Iran without regard. China's arms exports to Iran have been minimal, accounting for only 1% of total exports since 2015.
4. In fact, internationally, China's military strength has always been seen as far behind Russia's. Countries sanctioned by the U.S. mainly develop military ties with Russia, which treats this as a revenue-generating opportunity. Chinese military enthusiasts only began to understand the 'real' state of Russia's military after the Russia-Ukraine conflict—before that, many tended to overestimate it. Claims that China's weapons are the best in the world, even surpassing those of the U.S., are only recently emerging with new evidence from 2025. In some branch-specific military rankings, China even ranks behind India. China itself doesn't place much emphasis on arms exports; while other exports are thriving, China's domestic weapons production is already sufficient, making exports not a priority. Fortunately, China has a long-term cooperation mechanism with Pakistan. However, Pakistan still admires U.S. weapons—when it acquired the J-10C in 2022, it was Prime Minister Imran Khan who, in 2021, overruled opposition and personally approved the deal and presided over its induction ceremony, later being thanked by the public while in prison.
5. Therefore, when the U.S. and Israel conduct military strikes on Iran and Middle Eastern forces, or when the U.S. targets Venezuela, the main loser is Russia. China has sold very few weapons to these countries, and they weren't particularly interested anyway—any chance was missed. No country has ever relied on Chinese weapons; it's never happened. Only Pakistan was pleasantly surprised and felt they gained a great deal. Whether Iran or Venezuela suffer heavily from U.S. or Israeli attacks, it has nothing to do with China. It might even reflect the failure of Russian weapons, but China has no reason to worry.
6. The U.S. and Israel's military actions in the Middle East and Latin America create instability abroad, but they have no direct impact on China. Some Chinese experts and citizens sometimes feel sympathy or hope for countries targeted by the U.S., hoping they resist effectively. For example, when the U.S. invaded Iraq, Chinese public opinion expected a strong resistance. But one should not get overly emotionally involved—these are other countries' affairs, and they don't hold China in particularly high regard anyway.
Translate
关心一下自己人吧……
Domestic sycophants cleaning the ground, getting slapped in the face by Americans [laughing][laughing][laughing]
Translate
糟粕
In the cool breeze of the Summer Palace, Empress Dowager Cixi suddenly saw a child playing among the grass and asked Li Lianying, 'Whose child is this?' Li Lianying bowed and replied, 'Your Majesty, everyone calls him Little Rabbit Prince; his origins are unknown.
When the child saw Empress Dowager Cixi, he immediately stopped playing, knelt down, and paid his respects with a clear, bright voice. Empress Dowager Cixi said nothing, turned around, and walked away. Li Lianying followed closely behind, his expression tinged with a mix of nervousness and hope. Though he was the chief eunuch, wielding immense power, even the Grand Councilors respected him, and he had served Empress Dowager Cixi since the Xianfeng era, having witnessed the era of regency, the western retreat, and return to Beijing. He was now her most trusted confidant, yet he could not escape the fate of eunuchs—childless. This Little Rabbit Prince had been carefully arranged by Li Lianying long ago: an orphan from a circus troupe, brought into the palace and meticulously trained in etiquette and court manners. Only because the boy was intelligent, quick-witted, and knew how to behave appropriately did Li Lianying dare to present him before Empress Dowager Cixi.
Empress Dowager Cixi saw through it all. She had lost her own child early in life and naturally felt sympathy for children. Seeing Li Lianying’s declining health in recent years, she understood he longed for someone to care for him in his old age. She had never forgotten his loyalty and kindness—his constant care during the western retreat, his devoted attention during illness, all etched deeply in her heart.
The real turning point came during one of Empress Dowager Cixi’s nighttime illnesses. The boy volunteered to stay by her side through the night, silently guarding her, serving tea and water with perfect propriety. In her delirium, Cixi remembered the boy’s calm and measured demeanor. From then on, the boy frequently entered her private chambers, running errands, providing companionship, even learning to read aloud for her. When Prince Qing came to discuss affairs, he saw the boy explaining illustrated books at Empress Dowager Cixi’s feet. She quietly remarked, 'Though young, his mind is as delicate as a hair,' sealing his position.
Later, two months before Empress Dowager Cixi’s death, Li Lianying fell gravely ill. The boy attended to him daily. When Cixi saw Li Lianying in his final days, she said only, 'Don’t worry, someone will take your place.' This nameless boy from a circus troupe, through Li Lianying’s careful planning and his own intelligence, became the one who could stand in for Li Lianying—becoming a secret legacy within the imperial court, a quiet testament to trust and devotion.
When the child saw Empress Dowager Cixi, he immediately stopped playing, knelt down, and paid his respects with a clear, bright voice. Empress Dowager Cixi said nothing, turned around, and walked away. Li Lianying followed closely behind, his expression tinged with a mix of nervousness and hope. Though he was the chief eunuch, wielding immense power, even the Grand Councilors respected him, and he had served Empress Dowager Cixi since the Xianfeng era, having witnessed the era of regency, the western retreat, and return to Beijing. He was now her most trusted confidant, yet he could not escape the fate of eunuchs—childless. This Little Rabbit Prince had been carefully arranged by Li Lianying long ago: an orphan from a circus troupe, brought into the palace and meticulously trained in etiquette and court manners. Only because the boy was intelligent, quick-witted, and knew how to behave appropriately did Li Lianying dare to present him before Empress Dowager Cixi.
Empress Dowager Cixi saw through it all. She had lost her own child early in life and naturally felt sympathy for children. Seeing Li Lianying’s declining health in recent years, she understood he longed for someone to care for him in his old age. She had never forgotten his loyalty and kindness—his constant care during the western retreat, his devoted attention during illness, all etched deeply in her heart.
The real turning point came during one of Empress Dowager Cixi’s nighttime illnesses. The boy volunteered to stay by her side through the night, silently guarding her, serving tea and water with perfect propriety. In her delirium, Cixi remembered the boy’s calm and measured demeanor. From then on, the boy frequently entered her private chambers, running errands, providing companionship, even learning to read aloud for her. When Prince Qing came to discuss affairs, he saw the boy explaining illustrated books at Empress Dowager Cixi’s feet. She quietly remarked, 'Though young, his mind is as delicate as a hair,' sealing his position.
Later, two months before Empress Dowager Cixi’s death, Li Lianying fell gravely ill. The boy attended to him daily. When Cixi saw Li Lianying in his final days, she said only, 'Don’t worry, someone will take your place.' This nameless boy from a circus troupe, through Li Lianying’s careful planning and his own intelligence, became the one who could stand in for Li Lianying—becoming a secret legacy within the imperial court, a quiet testament to trust and devotion.
Translate
回来再建一个，干爹支持你，在外面不安全！回来，给你个新身份，过去的那个拉头猪处决了就行！
Chen Zhi was repatriated to China, sending out an extremely dangerous yet widely ignored signal: even if you 'profit' your way out, you're not safe anymore.
Pay attention to a detail — before Chen Zhi was brought back, there was no extradition procedure, no judicial battle, not even any public announcement.
He was simply gone, and then back.
In my view, this incident has sent at least three layers of signals, each as clear as can be.
First layer: China's 'long-range fishing' capability far exceeds what most people imagine. Do you think changing nationality guarantees safety? Do you believe a Cambodian noble title, diplomatic passport, or a network of political and business connections can protect you? The truth is: none of it works.
When the system decides to take someone, identity is just a label, not a shield.
That old logic — 'as long as I'm not within the country, they can't touch me' — is completely outdated.
Second layer: Capitalism + Socialism are forming a dual iron fist.
You thought you were clever, hedging your bets and playing both sides: holding assets in the U.S., buying mansions, hoarding Bitcoin; making money in China, engaging in gray-area operations, pushing the boundaries of rules.
The result? The U.S. seizes your Bitcoin, freezes your London mansion; China brings your person back. One side takes your money, the other takes you. Both systems are closing in at the same time. You don't even have a place to run.
This isn't opposition — it's coordinated collaboration.
Third layer: The rules of the game have changed completely.
In the past, gray-zone players most believed in one phrase: 'As long as the profit is out and you're not involved on either side, you're safe.' Now reality has harshly told you: even if you're not involved, they'll still come for you.
The lines you've crossed won't vanish just because you've left the country; the risks you've created won't be erased by changing your passport. Those who will be dealt with, will be dealt with. The only difference is whether it happens sooner or later.
For the state, this is the most cost-effective move: replenishing the national treasury,
boosting national prestige, and sending a clear message to everyone — don't harbor illusions anymore.
So don't misjudge the significance of this case. Chen Zhi is not an isolated incident, but a sample. Clearly — China's long-range fishing has only just begun.
$GOUT $SOL $XRP
#加密市场反弹 #山寨季将至？ #Ripple拟建10亿美元XRP储备
Pay attention to a detail — before Chen Zhi was brought back, there was no extradition procedure, no judicial battle, not even any public announcement.
He was simply gone, and then back.
In my view, this incident has sent at least three layers of signals, each as clear as can be.
First layer: China's 'long-range fishing' capability far exceeds what most people imagine. Do you think changing nationality guarantees safety? Do you believe a Cambodian noble title, diplomatic passport, or a network of political and business connections can protect you? The truth is: none of it works.
When the system decides to take someone, identity is just a label, not a shield.
That old logic — 'as long as I'm not within the country, they can't touch me' — is completely outdated.
Second layer: Capitalism + Socialism are forming a dual iron fist.
You thought you were clever, hedging your bets and playing both sides: holding assets in the U.S., buying mansions, hoarding Bitcoin; making money in China, engaging in gray-area operations, pushing the boundaries of rules.
The result? The U.S. seizes your Bitcoin, freezes your London mansion; China brings your person back. One side takes your money, the other takes you. Both systems are closing in at the same time. You don't even have a place to run.
This isn't opposition — it's coordinated collaboration.
Third layer: The rules of the game have changed completely.
In the past, gray-zone players most believed in one phrase: 'As long as the profit is out and you're not involved on either side, you're safe.' Now reality has harshly told you: even if you're not involved, they'll still come for you.
The lines you've crossed won't vanish just because you've left the country; the risks you've created won't be erased by changing your passport. Those who will be dealt with, will be dealt with. The only difference is whether it happens sooner or later.
For the state, this is the most cost-effective move: replenishing the national treasury,
boosting national prestige, and sending a clear message to everyone — don't harbor illusions anymore.
So don't misjudge the significance of this case. Chen Zhi is not an isolated incident, but a sample. Clearly — China's long-range fishing has only just begun.
$GOUT $SOL $XRP
#加密市场反弹 #山寨季将至？ #Ripple拟建10亿美元XRP储备
Translate
基本盘，鉴定完毕
This time, American prosecutors probably won't have a peaceful breakfast. They originally thought Maduro would be an easy target, but he quickly brought in Barry Pollack.
Who is this guy? When Assange exposed the U.S. military's darkest secrets, he was practically on the brink of being torn apart, but it was Pollack who pulled him through.
Being able to safely return a "top-level fugitive" like Assange back to Australia for retirement, Pollack's legal expertise is undoubtedly at the top tier in the American legal community.
Maduro clearly sees through the game. If you want to play by the rules of law, then I'll bring in the person who knows the rules best to play with you.
This isn't just a simple trial—it's a fierce showdown between top-tier lawyers and the state machine. What seemed like the final act turns out to be only the beginning. The story is still fresh and juicy.
Who is this guy? When Assange exposed the U.S. military's darkest secrets, he was practically on the brink of being torn apart, but it was Pollack who pulled him through.
Being able to safely return a "top-level fugitive" like Assange back to Australia for retirement, Pollack's legal expertise is undoubtedly at the top tier in the American legal community.
Maduro clearly sees through the game. If you want to play by the rules of law, then I'll bring in the person who knows the rules best to play with you.
This isn't just a simple trial—it's a fierce showdown between top-tier lawyers and the state machine. What seemed like the final act turns out to be only the beginning. The story is still fresh and juicy.
Translate
我们村有家祖辈积累三代，富甲一方，但最近傻儿子主持大局，挥霍完了，其他儿子不同意，选择分家，这家人傻儿子是孝呢？还不孝呢？
Breaking! China Conducts Overnight Audit of $50 Billion in Troubled Venezuelan Assets, Will Global Oil Markets Explode?
Brothers, major news at night! Beijing has just issued an urgent directive to major banks across China — immediately investigate their risk exposure to Venezuela! On the surface, this appears to be financial regulation, but in reality, it's a seismic geopolitical signal!
One detail reveals the entire truth:
Since the Chávez era, China has pumped over $50 billion into Venezuela through oil-backed loans. Now that Maduro has been arrested and Trump is eyeing Latin America with intent, Beijing has suddenly panicked — 'Can we still recover our money?'
The Three Fears Behind the Late-Night Emergency Operation
One detail reveals the entire truth:
Since the Chávez era, China has pumped over $50 billion into Venezuela through oil-backed loans. Now that Maduro has been arrested and Trump is eyeing Latin America with intent, Beijing has suddenly panicked — 'Can we still recover our money?'
The Three Fears Behind the Late-Night Emergency Operation
Translate
一句话清楚共产：你的就是我的，我的还是我的！
Ms. Jiang's incident in Shanghai should have been heard by everyone, although the details may not be very clear.
Ms. Jiang, 45 years old, suddenly fainted. After being sent to the hospital, the hospital refused to provide treatment because there was no direct relative to sign. She had quite a bit of money (around 3 million), but it was of no use. In the end, her cousin rushed over and paid 200,000 out of his own pocket, and the hospital began to provide emergency treatment. However, time was wasted, and she could not be saved and passed away.
After her death, the cousin wanted to take money from her estate to reimburse himself for the money he spent, and also to buy a burial plot and arrange a funeral. The civil affairs bureau did not allow it, stating that it was unclaimed property and would be accepted by the civil affairs department according to the law. The expenses mentioned by the cousin did not fall within the "reasonable range."
This really stirred up the citizens' mentality. As of now, there doesn't seem to be a negotiable plan that all parties can accept. There are some procedures to follow.
$BNB
{future}(BNBUSDT)
Ms. Jiang, 45 years old, suddenly fainted. After being sent to the hospital, the hospital refused to provide treatment because there was no direct relative to sign. She had quite a bit of money (around 3 million), but it was of no use. In the end, her cousin rushed over and paid 200,000 out of his own pocket, and the hospital began to provide emergency treatment. However, time was wasted, and she could not be saved and passed away.
After her death, the cousin wanted to take money from her estate to reimburse himself for the money he spent, and also to buy a burial plot and arrange a funeral. The civil affairs bureau did not allow it, stating that it was unclaimed property and would be accepted by the civil affairs department according to the law. The expenses mentioned by the cousin did not fall within the "reasonable range."
This really stirred up the citizens' mentality. As of now, there doesn't seem to be a negotiable plan that all parties can accept. There are some procedures to follow.
$BNB
{future}(BNBUSDT)
See original
Learning to Walk in Handan
橘座
--
Digital Renminbi, has it really been pushed to the limit!
Let's first look at three very important things that happened after the 1128 meeting:
On the 11th of this month, the central bank issued a notice, deciding to authorize DBS Bank as the Renminbi clearing bank in Singapore, which is an important step in the internationalization of the Renminbi.
Singapore is the financial center of Asia, and DBS Bank is the largest commercial bank in Singapore.
Do you think this is the end? That's just external measures; the main purpose is to strengthen the internationalization of the Renminbi. Currently, the People's Bank of China has authorized 32 Renminbi clearing banks in 29 countries and regions.
Of course, there are also measures taken internally.
On the 11th of this month, the central bank issued a notice, deciding to authorize DBS Bank as the Renminbi clearing bank in Singapore, which is an important step in the internationalization of the Renminbi.
Singapore is the financial center of Asia, and DBS Bank is the largest commercial bank in Singapore.
Do you think this is the end? That's just external measures; the main purpose is to strengthen the internationalization of the Renminbi. Currently, the People's Bank of China has authorized 32 Renminbi clearing banks in 29 countries and regions.
Of course, there are also measures taken internally.
See original
False, big, 🈳️!
【Digital Currency】🇨🇳's S-level move has finally been revealed, which can be described as a dimensional strike of fiat currency against ordinary virtual currencies.
Starting from January 1st next year, which means it will take effect tomorrow,
our Digital Currency version 2.0 will officially launch,
upgrading directly from electronic cash to an amount that can produce value.
Wallet balances can earn interest just like bank deposits,
and the interest is also included in deposit insurance.
With a bottom line guarantee of up to 500,000,
it's like putting your money in a national-level safe.
In contrast, stablecoins like USDT and USDC:
are like a piggy bank,
not only without interest but also prone to breakage.
Because the laws of various countries clearly state:
stablecoins cannot have interest.
The interest generated from the U.S. Treasury bonds and other anchor assets they hold
is all kept by issuers like Tether,
which means the price difference is entirely pocketed by middlemen.
Our digital currency is different:
👉 The interest is directly left to us.
In addition, we won't mention the often-discussed risk of detachment.
The most crucial point is:
stablecoins like USDT are not protected by law domestically.
If the coins are gone and the people run away,
you can only stare blankly.
This is not the end; the practical skills of digital currency are fully loaded:
• Taxi rides
• Grocery shopping
• Paying water and electricity bills
• Seeing a doctor, going to school
• Even offline payments without internet
Cross-border use is even more powerful:
• 7×24 hours of uninterrupted trading
• Connecting to the central bank's monetary bridge
• Traveling to cooperative countries without needing to exchange foreign currency
• Saving handling fees
• Saving on exchange rate differences
For businesses engaged in cross-border trade and transferring funds:
👉 Lower costs and faster transactions.
⸻
The most impressive thing is that the timing chosen by the central bank is just too perfect.
This wave of digital currency moves,
coincidentally coincides with the recent appreciation of the RMB,
which is equivalent to a double buff boost.
I have to say:
There are indeed experts inside the central bank.
Starting from January 1st next year, which means it will take effect tomorrow,
our Digital Currency version 2.0 will officially launch,
upgrading directly from electronic cash to an amount that can produce value.
Wallet balances can earn interest just like bank deposits,
and the interest is also included in deposit insurance.
With a bottom line guarantee of up to 500,000,
it's like putting your money in a national-level safe.
In contrast, stablecoins like USDT and USDC:
are like a piggy bank,
not only without interest but also prone to breakage.
Because the laws of various countries clearly state:
stablecoins cannot have interest.
The interest generated from the U.S. Treasury bonds and other anchor assets they hold
is all kept by issuers like Tether,
which means the price difference is entirely pocketed by middlemen.
Our digital currency is different:
👉 The interest is directly left to us.
In addition, we won't mention the often-discussed risk of detachment.
The most crucial point is:
stablecoins like USDT are not protected by law domestically.
If the coins are gone and the people run away,
you can only stare blankly.
This is not the end; the practical skills of digital currency are fully loaded:
• Taxi rides
• Grocery shopping
• Paying water and electricity bills
• Seeing a doctor, going to school
• Even offline payments without internet
Cross-border use is even more powerful:
• 7×24 hours of uninterrupted trading
• Connecting to the central bank's monetary bridge
• Traveling to cooperative countries without needing to exchange foreign currency
• Saving handling fees
• Saving on exchange rate differences
For businesses engaged in cross-border trade and transferring funds:
👉 Lower costs and faster transactions.
⸻
The most impressive thing is that the timing chosen by the central bank is just too perfect.
This wave of digital currency moves,
coincidentally coincides with the recent appreciation of the RMB,
which is equivalent to a double buff boost.
I have to say:
There are indeed experts inside the central bank.
See original
You are sick, in business transactions you shamelessly curse others, who curses you when you trade here
The RMB has finally appreciated and broken 7, and some shameless individuals have exchanged a large amount of RMB for USD... I've heard that it's still some big banks doing this!
See original
Welcome to expose the list of shareholders of the telecom fraud garden, recently the scam calls have decreased
Cambodia is being beaten, and the root cause is the failure of "bat diplomacy!"
The conflict at the Cambodia-Thailand border has entered a basic ceasefire state after multiple mediations. Both sides of the conflict have expressed gratitude to China, indicating that China's intervention has been effective; although there is no promised agreement, at least the fighting has stopped. China's constructive role in regional affairs highlights the strategic miscalculation of Cambodia's "bat diplomacy," which attempted to play both sides between China and the United States but ultimately found itself isolated and beaten due to failing to please either side.
1. Wavering allegiance is the main reason for the beating. The surface of the Cambodia-Thailand border conflict is a territorial and resource dispute, but at a deeper level, it stems from Cambodia's attempts at "bat diplomacy" between China and the United States, wanting to cling to China for investment and trade while simultaneously restarting military exercises with the U.S., opening bases, and seeking U.S. mediation in crises, treating China's strategic trust as if it were nonexistent. Thailand, already irritated by territorial disputes, naturally does not show "face" to Cambodia, striking back hard without holding back.
Similar to a small brother in the underworld, saying that someone is protecting me, you can't touch me, etc. If Cambodia were wholeheartedly a partner of China, Thailand would surely give face. And this time, Thailand dared to strike because it saw that no one was protecting Cambodia.
2. The real-life tragedy of the bat fable is reenacted over Cambodia. In Western fables, bats stand on both sides in the battle of birds and beasts but end up empty-handed; Cambodia is currently in the same situation. U.S. mediation is nothing but empty promises, and Trump's so-called "ceasefire agreement" has repeatedly become a laughingstock, which Thailand does not recognize; the face given during China's mediation is for long-term strategic partners, not for the "fence-sitters" who jump back and forth. This shows a sincere effort at mediation, but it does not support the small brother. The Hun Manet government mistakenly thought it could play both sides but has instead become a lonely figure with no one genuinely backing it, foolishly placing itself in a burning situation.
3. Hun Manet's study abroad background may become a fatal weakness. Hun Manet's experience studying in the United States is far from just a simple educational background. There are numerous examples of Western politicians being compromised by the U.S. and making decisions that harm their own country's interests. He restarted the "Angkor Sentinel" military exercises, opened the Yunrong base, and followed the U.S. stance on the South China Sea issue—none of which align with Cambodia's fundamental interests. He is clearly being led by U.S. chips, destroying the trust foundation in China built by his father, Hun Sen. So why do this? Is it because he was compromised by the Americans back then?
4. Who is the real backer? Cambodia needs to rethink, as opportunities are limited. By mid-2024, the trade volume between China and Cambodia will exceed $14.4 billion, with China being Cambodia's largest trading partner and investor, relying on China for key areas such as infrastructure, energy, and agriculture. What the U.S. offers is merely political gimmicks like military exercises and warship dockings, and when it comes to conflict, there is no substantial aid at all. This beating should awaken the Hun Manet government. What can save Cambodia is never the distant U.S., which comes with conditions, but rather the nearby China, which is sincere and genuine.
Cambodia's beating is the inevitable price of the Hun Manet administration's foolish "bat diplomacy." Fantasizing about eating from both sides will ultimately only lead to being disliked by both and facing harsh reality. They should tightly embrace China, which can truly provide stable development and security guarantees, so Cambodia can completely quell the border fires and safeguard its fundamental national interests.
The conflict at the Cambodia-Thailand border has entered a basic ceasefire state after multiple mediations. Both sides of the conflict have expressed gratitude to China, indicating that China's intervention has been effective; although there is no promised agreement, at least the fighting has stopped. China's constructive role in regional affairs highlights the strategic miscalculation of Cambodia's "bat diplomacy," which attempted to play both sides between China and the United States but ultimately found itself isolated and beaten due to failing to please either side.
1. Wavering allegiance is the main reason for the beating. The surface of the Cambodia-Thailand border conflict is a territorial and resource dispute, but at a deeper level, it stems from Cambodia's attempts at "bat diplomacy" between China and the United States, wanting to cling to China for investment and trade while simultaneously restarting military exercises with the U.S., opening bases, and seeking U.S. mediation in crises, treating China's strategic trust as if it were nonexistent. Thailand, already irritated by territorial disputes, naturally does not show "face" to Cambodia, striking back hard without holding back.
Similar to a small brother in the underworld, saying that someone is protecting me, you can't touch me, etc. If Cambodia were wholeheartedly a partner of China, Thailand would surely give face. And this time, Thailand dared to strike because it saw that no one was protecting Cambodia.
2. The real-life tragedy of the bat fable is reenacted over Cambodia. In Western fables, bats stand on both sides in the battle of birds and beasts but end up empty-handed; Cambodia is currently in the same situation. U.S. mediation is nothing but empty promises, and Trump's so-called "ceasefire agreement" has repeatedly become a laughingstock, which Thailand does not recognize; the face given during China's mediation is for long-term strategic partners, not for the "fence-sitters" who jump back and forth. This shows a sincere effort at mediation, but it does not support the small brother. The Hun Manet government mistakenly thought it could play both sides but has instead become a lonely figure with no one genuinely backing it, foolishly placing itself in a burning situation.
3. Hun Manet's study abroad background may become a fatal weakness. Hun Manet's experience studying in the United States is far from just a simple educational background. There are numerous examples of Western politicians being compromised by the U.S. and making decisions that harm their own country's interests. He restarted the "Angkor Sentinel" military exercises, opened the Yunrong base, and followed the U.S. stance on the South China Sea issue—none of which align with Cambodia's fundamental interests. He is clearly being led by U.S. chips, destroying the trust foundation in China built by his father, Hun Sen. So why do this? Is it because he was compromised by the Americans back then?
4. Who is the real backer? Cambodia needs to rethink, as opportunities are limited. By mid-2024, the trade volume between China and Cambodia will exceed $14.4 billion, with China being Cambodia's largest trading partner and investor, relying on China for key areas such as infrastructure, energy, and agriculture. What the U.S. offers is merely political gimmicks like military exercises and warship dockings, and when it comes to conflict, there is no substantial aid at all. This beating should awaken the Hun Manet government. What can save Cambodia is never the distant U.S., which comes with conditions, but rather the nearby China, which is sincere and genuine.
Cambodia's beating is the inevitable price of the Hun Manet administration's foolish "bat diplomacy." Fantasizing about eating from both sides will ultimately only lead to being disliked by both and facing harsh reality. They should tightly embrace China, which can truly provide stable development and security guarantees, so Cambodia can completely quell the border fires and safeguard its fundamental national interests.
Btc
Quoted content has been removed
See original
Xai
SaixKeith
--
Vanguard Genesis: Not just an event, but also a stress test
The Vanguard Genesis event by XAI has driven daily trading volumes on the network to exceed 5 million times. This is not just a marketing campaign, but a real-world drill.
Through this large-scale community mobilization, XAI has verified the stability of its network under extreme load. Participants receive not only points and NFTs but also certificates for future airdrops. This operational model of 'learning through battle' has allowed XAI's ecosystem to undergo rigorous testing even before the mainnet explosion.
@XAI_GAMES @CZ @Yi He $XAI
{spot}(XAIUSDT)
🚫 Reject misleading information: Ex Populus has filed a lawsuit against Musk's xAI company. The efforts of the Vanguard should not be confused; the Xai brand belongs to us. For details, visit: http://news.expopulus.com.
The Vanguard Genesis event by XAI has driven daily trading volumes on the network to exceed 5 million times. This is not just a marketing campaign, but a real-world drill.
Through this large-scale community mobilization, XAI has verified the stability of its network under extreme load. Participants receive not only points and NFTs but also certificates for future airdrops. This operational model of 'learning through battle' has allowed XAI's ecosystem to undergo rigorous testing even before the mainnet explosion.
@XAI_GAMES @CZ @Yi He $XAI
{spot}(XAIUSDT)
🚫 Reject misleading information: Ex Populus has filed a lawsuit against Musk's xAI company. The efforts of the Vanguard should not be confused; the Xai brand belongs to us. For details, visit: http://news.expopulus.com.
See original
Cai
SaixKeith
--
Vanguard Genesis: Not just an event, but also a stress test
The Vanguard Genesis event by XAI has driven daily trading volumes on the network to exceed 5 million times. This is not just a marketing campaign, but a real-world drill.
Through this large-scale community mobilization, XAI has verified the stability of its network under extreme load. Participants receive not only points and NFTs but also certificates for future airdrops. This operational model of 'learning through battle' has allowed XAI's ecosystem to undergo rigorous testing even before the mainnet explosion.
@XAI_GAMES @CZ @Yi He $XAI
{spot}(XAIUSDT)
🚫 Reject misleading information: Ex Populus has filed a lawsuit against Musk's xAI company. The efforts of the Vanguard should not be confused; the Xai brand belongs to us. For details, visit: http://news.expopulus.com.
The Vanguard Genesis event by XAI has driven daily trading volumes on the network to exceed 5 million times. This is not just a marketing campaign, but a real-world drill.
Through this large-scale community mobilization, XAI has verified the stability of its network under extreme load. Participants receive not only points and NFTs but also certificates for future airdrops. This operational model of 'learning through battle' has allowed XAI's ecosystem to undergo rigorous testing even before the mainnet explosion.
@XAI_GAMES @CZ @Yi He $XAI
{spot}(XAIUSDT)
🚫 Reject misleading information: Ex Populus has filed a lawsuit against Musk's xAI company. The efforts of the Vanguard should not be confused; the Xai brand belongs to us. For details, visit: http://news.expopulus.com.
See original
A group of people who think they are the masters every day, yet have rights lower than those of slaves
I checked it, and it's true, Feng Xiaogang really said it.
See original
Android Thinking: Beauty has declined
【Crypto Circle Shocking In-Depth Analysis】China-U.S. Trade War: Trump's "Last" Poker Game
Everyone has seen it, right? Trump has really used all his "dark chess" this time—the port docking fees have almost become a "stabilizing force," and the restrictions on chip manufacturing equipment have truly "choked" China's neck. It seems like a move to defeat the enemy, but in reality, it's just a "last-minute effort," and the cards he can play are really getting fewer.
🔮Port docking fees, this thing is like a nuclear bomb, capable of destroying the global shipping chain behind it. But to be honest, once this kind of trick is overused, it can really hurt oneself in the process. Moreover, doing this way, the global supply chain will not only harm China but also cause the global economy to drop in value, making it impossible to end well.
🔮Port docking fees, this thing is like a nuclear bomb, capable of destroying the global shipping chain behind it. But to be honest, once this kind of trick is overused, it can really hurt oneself in the process. Moreover, doing this way, the global supply chain will not only harm China but also cause the global economy to drop in value, making it impossible to end well.
See original
Android Thinking
🇺🇸🇨🇳 US-China Trade War: How Many Cards Does Trump Have Left?
The recent situation increasingly resembles a 'final showdown'.
The port docking fee is actually the US testing the limits of shipping blockades. Before this, measures like controlling chip manufacturing equipment and blacklisting non-American companies have almost exhausted America's options.
What remains to be played are a few 'self-destructive' tough cards:
Kicking out SWIFT? That would directly challenge the dollar's hegemony.
Once China is kicked out of the system, the acceleration of RMB settlements will impact the US debt system instantly, and the US itself may face a crisis.
Swallowing China's US debt? The over 700 billion in US debt won't plug many holes, but it would mean admitting to a bankruptcy of US debt credit. The financial system would also collapse.
Delisting Chinese stocks, confiscating Chinese assets? The former has limited impact, while the latter could result in severe losses for US investments in China if retaliated.
Chasing away students and AI engineers? Symbolically significant, but practically ineffective.
At the geopolitical level, the Taiwan card is still at a stalemate; the North Korea-South Korea war card has already lost its effectiveness; and Russian resistance to China is merely a fantasy.
The only card left that could theoretically be effective is shipping route blockades.
Suez, Malacca, Panama, Mediterranean... As long as the US military collaborates with node countries to establish no-sail zones for Chinese vessels, this would essentially be an act of war.
But the question is, does the US dare?
If this move is made, the global supply chain would collapse instantly, oil prices would skyrocket, inflation would spiral out of control, and the risk of hot war would be directly maximized.
So you will find that the cards the US has played recently:
100% tariffs, chasing away students, banning edible oil exports, rare earth price controls, and up to 500% tariffs
Seemingly a series of attacks, but in reality, it shows their desperation.
The only possible outcomes are two paths:
Either compromise on chip manufacturing equipment to ease tensions;
Or gamble on shipping blockades, leading to global confrontation.
One is a Taco at the negotiation table,
The other is a bomb at the war table.
The world now awaits to see how Trump will choose.
$XPIN $BAS $ZKC #加密市场回调 #美SEC推动加密创新监管
The recent situation increasingly resembles a 'final showdown'.
The port docking fee is actually the US testing the limits of shipping blockades. Before this, measures like controlling chip manufacturing equipment and blacklisting non-American companies have almost exhausted America's options.
What remains to be played are a few 'self-destructive' tough cards:
Kicking out SWIFT? That would directly challenge the dollar's hegemony.
Once China is kicked out of the system, the acceleration of RMB settlements will impact the US debt system instantly, and the US itself may face a crisis.
Swallowing China's US debt? The over 700 billion in US debt won't plug many holes, but it would mean admitting to a bankruptcy of US debt credit. The financial system would also collapse.
Delisting Chinese stocks, confiscating Chinese assets? The former has limited impact, while the latter could result in severe losses for US investments in China if retaliated.
Chasing away students and AI engineers? Symbolically significant, but practically ineffective.
At the geopolitical level, the Taiwan card is still at a stalemate; the North Korea-South Korea war card has already lost its effectiveness; and Russian resistance to China is merely a fantasy.
The only card left that could theoretically be effective is shipping route blockades.
Suez, Malacca, Panama, Mediterranean... As long as the US military collaborates with node countries to establish no-sail zones for Chinese vessels, this would essentially be an act of war.
But the question is, does the US dare?
If this move is made, the global supply chain would collapse instantly, oil prices would skyrocket, inflation would spiral out of control, and the risk of hot war would be directly maximized.
So you will find that the cards the US has played recently:
100% tariffs, chasing away students, banning edible oil exports, rare earth price controls, and up to 500% tariffs
Seemingly a series of attacks, but in reality, it shows their desperation.
The only possible outcomes are two paths:
Either compromise on chip manufacturing equipment to ease tensions;
Or gamble on shipping blockades, leading to global confrontation.
One is a Taco at the negotiation table,
The other is a bomb at the war table.
The world now awaits to see how Trump will choose.
$XPIN $BAS $ZKC #加密市场回调 #美SEC推动加密创新监管
See original
Calculating the lift time, it's all Chinese plates, sigh
$COAI Short sellers hurry up to post
Coai data is very fake!!!
I don’t know if it’s the project party pushing the price or something impressive from abroad; Coai data is very fake, and I don’t understand why the valuation can be so high, there are not many people using the model store.
The left image is Coai's model store, and the right image is the button from Chinese ByteDance (the website is at the very top).
I have doubts about the Coai project; if Coai is just a ghostwriter with a market value of 4.8 billion, then according to this data comparison, the button's market value should be at 100 billion USD #十月加密行情 .
If anyone knows why the valuation is so high, feel free to come and discuss with me!
What I fear most is the game of passing the buck.
Coai data is very fake!!!
I don’t know if it’s the project party pushing the price or something impressive from abroad; Coai data is very fake, and I don’t understand why the valuation can be so high, there are not many people using the model store.
The left image is Coai's model store, and the right image is the button from Chinese ByteDance (the website is at the very top).
I have doubts about the Coai project; if Coai is just a ghostwriter with a market value of 4.8 billion, then according to this data comparison, the button's market value should be at 100 billion USD #十月加密行情 .
If anyone knows why the valuation is so high, feel free to come and discuss with me!
What I fear most is the game of passing the buck.
Login to explore more contents