Anh_ba_Cong
Open Trade
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
7.9 Years
EA Expert
99 Following
7.5K+ Followers
14.9K+ Liked
1.3K+ Shared
All
Quotes
PINNED
See original
I'll Share with You the Secret Tips for Earning Free Money on Binance Without Having to "Trade"!
Hello everyone, I am Anh ba Cong!
Surely many of us participate in the crypto market to make money, but are afraid of trading because it is too risky and stressful. Don't worry, I will share with you extremely simple ways to earn free and passive cryptocurrency on Binance without having to watch candles or buy and sell anything at all.
This article will introduce 6 super cool features for you to "earn money" gradually, including: Refer friends, Learn & Earn, Savings (Staking & Savings), Write articles on Square, New listing promotions, and especially the HODLer Airdrop for BNB holders.
Surely many of us participate in the crypto market to make money, but are afraid of trading because it is too risky and stressful. Don't worry, I will share with you extremely simple ways to earn free and passive cryptocurrency on Binance without having to watch candles or buy and sell anything at all.
This article will introduce 6 super cool features for you to "earn money" gradually, including: Refer friends, Learn & Earn, Savings (Staking & Savings), Write articles on Square, New listing promotions, and especially the HODLer Airdrop for BNB holders.
PINNED
See original
Why does investing in Crypto seem easy but is actually hard?
Hello everyone, I am Anh ba Công. Surely many of us have heard the saying "investing in crypto is just about buying and holding to win". Looking at the price chart of Bitcoin or many major altcoins, we can see that prices only go up in the long term. However, why are there still very few people who actually succeed with this strategy? Today, I will share 3 common reasons that newcomers often encounter, which prevent them from "holding on until the end" and missing opportunities.
Kevin O'Leary: Fed Rate Cuts Won't Fuel Major Bitcoin Surge
Venture capitalist Kevin O'Leary, often referred to as "Shark," has expressed skepticism regarding both the timing of Federal Reserve rate cuts and their potential impact on Bitcoin (BTC) price. O'Leary stated he does not anticipate a rate cut in December, arguing that inflation remains elevated, giving the Fed ample reason to maintain current interest rates.
Furthermore, O’Leary dismissed the idea that a rate cut, should it occur, would significantly boost Bitcoin. He views BTC as currently stable and likely to remain volatile within a narrow range of roughly 5% for the immediate future. Concluding his analysis, O'Leary noted a lack of any strong signals suggesting either a parabolic rally or a major deep decline for Bitcoin at this time, advising investors to expect continued consolidation. $BTC
Venture capitalist Kevin O'Leary, often referred to as "Shark," has expressed skepticism regarding both the timing of Federal Reserve rate cuts and their potential impact on Bitcoin (BTC) price. O'Leary stated he does not anticipate a rate cut in December, arguing that inflation remains elevated, giving the Fed ample reason to maintain current interest rates.
Furthermore, O’Leary dismissed the idea that a rate cut, should it occur, would significantly boost Bitcoin. He views BTC as currently stable and likely to remain volatile within a narrow range of roughly 5% for the immediate future. Concluding his analysis, O'Leary noted a lack of any strong signals suggesting either a parabolic rally or a major deep decline for Bitcoin at this time, advising investors to expect continued consolidation. $BTC
See original
INJ: Is This Ecosystem About to "Explode" or Just a Dream, What Do You Hope For the Most?
This afternoon, sitting and scrolling through feed X, holding the Netflix remote and changing channels randomly, I suddenly stopped at a post from @injdev about the MultiVM Ecosystem Campaign that just launched on 4/12, running until 4/1/2026, with a 5k INJ reward pool for the top 100 on the Bantr leaderboard, over 30 projects live on Day 1 of the EVM mainnet in November. My friend pinged "Hey, now INJ is 5.98 USD, is this ecosystem campaign going to pump, what are your expectations?", I replied "Big expectations, but not a short pump, rather an increase in dev activity, iBuild Q1 2026 no-code dApp, ETF Canary Capital Delaware trust in June, burning 6.78M INJ in October to tighten supply." Suddenly, I started thinking aimlessly, because Injective has been around for more than 4 years, from Cosmos SDK order book on-chain against MEV, now MultiVM combines EVM and Cosmos, but the real expectation is not a price x10, but for the dev builder community to stay long, creating dApps with real utility, not chasing hype and then dumping like other L1s. Damn, I once held INJ back in 2022 when it dumped from 50 down to 1 USD, lost sleep checking the chart, but now I hope the ecosystem matures, INJ 3.0 deflationary tie staking burn, developer momentum translates to wide adoption, how about you, comment below, what do you expect the most from this ecosystem?
See original
KITE: The Pieces Being Revealed, Or Just An AI Dream About To Fade?
This morning I woke up early, the weather in Hue was foggy, I skimmed through the Messari report about Kite AI, the L1 blockchain on Avalanche for agent payment, the KITE token slightly dumped to 0.098 USD after the surge in November, with a volume of 62 million yesterday according to CMC, but the TVL ecosystem crept up thanks to x402 integration. A friend texted me "Hey, have KITE and the AI agent pieces been fully revealed yet, or are we still dreaming?", I replied "Soon, but not in a sudden reveal, it's a gradual assembly from verifiable identity to programmable governance, making agents no longer a fanciful idea". Suddenly I thought wanderingly, because of AI x crypto 2025, everything feels like a puzzle missing pieces, agents promise to transact machine-to-machine, but without temporal structure, it's just chaos – permissions hanging, small budgets turning into large debts, human oversight being slow. Kite doesn't loudly shout about revolution, but quietly assembles pieces: layer identity user-agent-session, session droplets evaporate when expired, making autonomy not about forever access but scheduled timely, transforming the agent economy from hype into reality revealed piece by piece.
See original
FF: What Do Traditional Businesses See in Falcon Beyond Risk and Hype?
Today, I wandered through a webinar about RWA on LinkedIn, holding a cup of black coffee without sugar, and suddenly stopped at the Q&A section when a suited man from a major bank in Singapore asked, "Falcon Finance with this FF token, does it really bridge TradFi and DeFi, or is it just a yield farm trap?" I chuckled to myself because that question made me think for a long time. In this crypto 2025, traditional businesses – those banks, fund managers, corporate treasuries – when looking at projects like Falcon, they don't see pump charts or huge airdrops; they see the opportunity to tokenize real assets, mint USDf over-collateralized from T-bills or corporate bonds, transforming liquidity on-chain without losing off-chain control. Damn, the insight here is that they see Falcon not as a crazy disruptor, but as a natural extension of TradFi, with universal collateral accepting volatile crypto stablecoin RWA, bridging through partnerships like BitGo custody or WLFI committing 10 million, helping them dip their toes into DeFi without fear of collapse like Terra did back in 2022.
See original
BANK: Benefits Are Not Chased Upfront, Why Does the Lorenzo Community "Stick" Around So Long?
Tonight, sitting and scrolling X, remote in hand changing Netflix channels, I suddenly stopped at a short clip about the Lorenzo Protocol, the DeFi project making OTF – on-chain traded funds – with BANK token governance, priced at a low 0.044 USD after a 38% dump last week according to CoinGecko, but the TVL still crept up to over 1 billion thanks to stBTC staking. My friend pinged "Hey, man, BANK listed on Binance in November pumped 90% and then crashed 46%, should I hold or sell?", I replied "Hold, because the community here doesn’t chase quick benefits, but builds slowly, so stay for a long time." Exactly, in this chaotic DeFi space, many protocols promise sky-high yields, APR 100% to lure newcomers, but then the stress tests hit – volatility spikes, liquidation cascades – the community falls apart because of benefits running to their heads, everyone chases pumps and then dumps. But Lorenzo is different, the insight here is that benefits are not upfront, no drama, but deterministic mechanics – rebalance mechanical, redemption from real assets, governance does not override strategy – making users feel safe, staying long-term because they see the system absorb stress without panic adjustments, turning them from speculators into true builders.
See original
YGG: The Real Value in This Guild, Not From Treasury or Dev Code?
This afternoon, I came across an old thread on Reddit about YGG while holding the remote control and changing TV channels. I suddenly stopped at a clip of an interview with Gabby Dizon – co-founder – talking about the early days of the guild's founding in Manila when Axie was booming and they had only a few dozen scholars grinding together. "Who do you think creates value for YGG?", my friend pinged a message, I replied, "It's not the devs or whales, but the players – people like me back in the day, grinding quests until our hands hurt". That's right, in this chaotic web3 gaming ecosystem, value doesn't come from the code or the $7.5 million NFT treasury pool from August, but from the scholars – ordinary players who grind to create a vibrant economy, provide feedback to devs to improve the game, and vote in the DAO to shape the future, turning the guild into a self-sustaining network instead of a hype machine that dies out after a bull run.
See original
APRO: A Strong Token Not Just for a Beautiful Chart, But Also for the Foundation to "Survive" Through Many Crashes?
Tonight lying down scrolling through feed X, the weather in Hanoi is chilly, I saw a post about APRO, a new rising oracle token priced low around 0.14 USD after dumping from the peak of 0.58 last October, with a 24h volume of over 70 million USD but holder retention only 60% according to CoinGecko. My friend texted "Do you think the APRO chart looks good, pump then dump, hold or sell?", I replied "What does it matter if the chart looks good, a strong token needs more than that". Suddenly I thought randomly, because this crypto has been around for over a decade, everyone loves the bright green charts, continuous green candles, but then the bear comes, and which tokens survive are not thanks to pump hype, but thanks to a solid foundation – like the roots of a tree, you don't see it but it keeps the tree standing through the storm. With APRO, I see that in the way it builds an oracle network that not only feeds data for DeFi but also integrates AI and RWA, creating real utility from 1400+ feeds across 40 chains, making the AT token not just a speculative toy but a necessary tool, surviving long through cycles because the devs and community align on long-term interests, not chasing short-term gains.
Machi’s Mixed Fortunes: $278K HYPE Loss Offsets ETH Long Gains
The prominent trader known as Machi has faced mixed financial results, suffering a significant loss on a speculative position just hours before realizing potential gains elsewhere. Machi incurred a $278,000 loss by closing out his entire 50,000 HYPE token position eight hours ago. $HYPE
Despite this setback, Machi continues to hold a substantial 25x leveraged long position on Ethereum (ETH), consisting of 11,700 ETH purchased at an average price of $3,051.7. This aggressive ETH trade is currently showing a floating profit of $1.44 million. However, the HYPE loss has impacted his Hyperliquid account, which, despite growing from $500,000 to $3.34 million, has now shrunk back to $2.73 million, illustrating the high-risk, high-reward nature of his trading strategy. $ETH
The prominent trader known as Machi has faced mixed financial results, suffering a significant loss on a speculative position just hours before realizing potential gains elsewhere. Machi incurred a $278,000 loss by closing out his entire 50,000 HYPE token position eight hours ago. $HYPE
Despite this setback, Machi continues to hold a substantial 25x leveraged long position on Ethereum (ETH), consisting of 11,700 ETH purchased at an average price of $3,051.7. This aggressive ETH trade is currently showing a floating profit of $1.44 million. However, the HYPE loss has impacted his Hyperliquid account, which, despite growing from $500,000 to $3.34 million, has now shrunk back to $2.73 million, illustrating the high-risk, high-reward nature of his trading strategy. $ETH
See original
SpaceX Transfers an Additional 100 Million USD in BTC: 1,083 Coins Transferred to New Wallet
SpaceX has made another significant Bitcoin transfer, moving 1,083 BTC, worth approximately 99.81 million dollars, exactly one week after their previous large transaction. According to on-chain analysts' monitoring, this move follows a consistent pattern of transferring assets to new addresses.
Of the total amount transferred, 800 BTC (73.71 million dollars) was sent to a brand new address, bc1qy…xv5g9, and remains there. Notably, the tokens transferred by SpaceX a week prior have also not been moved since the initial transfer to a new address. This latest action underscores SpaceX's active management of its significant Bitcoin treasury, with funds being transferred into newly created wallets, separated, potentially to enhance security or serve organizational purposes. $BTC
SpaceX has made another significant Bitcoin transfer, moving 1,083 BTC, worth approximately 99.81 million dollars, exactly one week after their previous large transaction. According to on-chain analysts' monitoring, this move follows a consistent pattern of transferring assets to new addresses.
Of the total amount transferred, 800 BTC (73.71 million dollars) was sent to a brand new address, bc1qy…xv5g9, and remains there. Notably, the tokens transferred by SpaceX a week prior have also not been moved since the initial transfer to a new address. This latest action underscores SpaceX's active management of its significant Bitcoin treasury, with funds being transferred into newly created wallets, separated, potentially to enhance security or serve organizational purposes. $BTC
The Ancient Whale Wakes: 1,000 BTC ($89M) Moved After 14 Years of Dormancy
A Bitcoin whale wallet, identified as "1Au1uZ," has ended an extraordinary period of inactivity, moving a massive amount of BTC after lying dormant for 14 years. Just two hours ago, the address transferred its entire holding of 1,000 BTC to a new, undisclosed wallet.
The historical context of this movement is staggering: the whale originally received the 1,000 BTC fourteen years ago when the asset was valued at a mere $3.88 per coin, totaling an initial investment of only $3,883. Today, the transferred hoard is valued at approximately $89 million. This sudden movement of long-held, untouched "sleepy" Bitcoin often captures the market’s attention, as it represents a significant portion of early supply becoming active again after a decade-plus of dedication to the HODL philosophy. $BTC
A Bitcoin whale wallet, identified as "1Au1uZ," has ended an extraordinary period of inactivity, moving a massive amount of BTC after lying dormant for 14 years. Just two hours ago, the address transferred its entire holding of 1,000 BTC to a new, undisclosed wallet.
The historical context of this movement is staggering: the whale originally received the 1,000 BTC fourteen years ago when the asset was valued at a mere $3.88 per coin, totaling an initial investment of only $3,883. Today, the transferred hoard is valued at approximately $89 million. This sudden movement of long-held, untouched "sleepy" Bitcoin often captures the market’s attention, as it represents a significant portion of early supply becoming active again after a decade-plus of dedication to the HODL philosophy. $BTC
‘0xBC64’ Whale Goes Shopping: $13.9M Haul Moved to On-Chain Storage
The mysterious cryptocurrency whale known as "0xBC64" capitalized on the recent market downturn, executing another substantial buying spree. This investor acquired approximately $13.9 million worth of ten diverse assets and subsequently transferred all of them to a secure on-chain wallet for holding.
The largest components of this acquisition included 22.7 million $ENA tokens ($5.92 million) and 1,898 $ETH ($5.79 million), making up the bulk of the portfolio addition. Significant purchases were also made in $LINK ($527K), UNI ($413K), and PENDLE ($323K). Other assets added to the whale's holdings were CRV, ONDO, ENS, AAVE, and AERO. This consistent strategy of aggressive buying during dips, followed by immediate transfer to cold storage, strongly suggests a long-term, high-conviction view on the recovery and future growth of these specific tokens.
The mysterious cryptocurrency whale known as "0xBC64" capitalized on the recent market downturn, executing another substantial buying spree. This investor acquired approximately $13.9 million worth of ten diverse assets and subsequently transferred all of them to a secure on-chain wallet for holding.
The largest components of this acquisition included 22.7 million $ENA tokens ($5.92 million) and 1,898 $ETH ($5.79 million), making up the bulk of the portfolio addition. Significant purchases were also made in $LINK ($527K), UNI ($413K), and PENDLE ($323K). Other assets added to the whale's holdings were CRV, ONDO, ENS, AAVE, and AERO. This consistent strategy of aggressive buying during dips, followed by immediate transfer to cold storage, strongly suggests a long-term, high-conviction view on the recovery and future growth of these specific tokens.
See original
BANK: Tokenomics – the most boring part of the whitepaper but it determines life or death in crypto
2h this morning I was scrolling through X and saw an old friend bragging about just x10 with a shitcoin, I congratulated him and quietly opened the Lorenzo Protocol tab to read the long tokenomics again. After reading, I almost fell off my chair: oh my god, why have I always skipped this part, every time I see the words vesting, emission, allocation I just auto next page. But tonight I read it and realized how important it is, more important than all the green and red candlestick charts I usually look at. Tokenomics is like the skeleton of the entire project, whether it looks good or bad, it doesn't matter, but without it, everything falls apart.
See original
FF: Tokenomics Is Not To Pump Prices, But To Ensure Holders Are Not "Wiped Out" After Hype?
Today the weather in Saigon is blazing hot, I'm sitting at a roadside café, pulling out my phone to check my wallet, seeing FF barely hovering around 0.12 USD, a slight dump from last week due to FUD regulation tightening on stablecoins. A friend calls via video, looking haggard, saying "Are you still holding FF? I've sold everything, now chasing other meme coins for a quick pump." I chuckle, but in my mind, I keep thinking about tokenomics – something many people consider a side note in the whitepaper, lengthy and boring, but in reality, it's like a house frame; if it's weak, the whole house collapses when the storm hits. With Falcon Finance or FF, I see its tokenomics isn't meant to promise huge wealth, but to create a system where holders like me feel there's something real, through long-term vesting, staking yield from protocol revenue, and governance votes directly affecting supply. It's not random; it's a way to ensure that value doesn't evaporate just after a hype season, helping you hold long-term without worrying about going broke.
See original
KITE: High Profits or Just a Dream, Is Safety What Keeps You from Going Home Empty-Handed?
Sitting at a café this afternoon, the weather in Saigon is drizzling, I pull out my phone to check my wallet, and see KITE is gently dumping from 0.1 USD to 0.09, my heart skips a beat. The friend sitting next to me scoffs, "Are you still holding? I sold everything last week, now I'm chasing other meme coins for quick pumps." I nod along, but in my mind, I keep thinking of the age-old question: in this crypto space, do you prioritize huge profits or safety to keep your wallet from ever being empty? It’s not always about choosing one, sometimes safety is the smart way to achieve sustainable profits, especially with projects like Kite – the blockchain for AI agents to transact themselves, where risks come not only from market volatility but also from how agents act beyond our control. I once lost sleep over a high-risk trade in 2023, pumped 3x then dumped to zero, since then I learned that, with KITE, prioritizing safety through temporal control for agents – those sessions that automatically expire – is the key to ensuring profits don’t vanish due to small errors.
See original
INJ: Between the Promise of X10 and the Wallet Still Being Full After the Bear Market?
At the end of 2025, sitting at a café with my friend, he pulled out his phone to show a screenshot of the INJ chart from the beginning of the year, the price skyrocketed to 50 USD after the EVM mainnet launch in November. "See, I told you, INJ is about to moon!" He laughed, but then sighed, because now the price is hovering around 5.7 USD, down over 80% from the peak. I nodded and asked, "So are you still holding, or have you sold off?" He shook his head, saying he had unstaked everything and switched to stablecoin because he was afraid of further collapse. That story made me think a lot; in this crypto world, everyone loves to hear promises of price increases – x10, x100, to the moon – but in the end, what keeps you in is not the dream of quick riches, but the feeling that your wallet is still safe, that value doesn’t evaporate even when the market is in turmoil. With Injective or INJ, I see that the real value lies not in pump hype, but in how it quietly protects the value you put in, through mechanisms like burning tokens from fees, stable staking yields, and governance votes to adjust supply. It's not about grand promises, just ensuring that holders don’t go empty-handed when everything collapses.
See original
YGG: When GameFi Collapses, How Does This Guild Still Keep Your Wallet?
At the end of 2025, BTC is sluggish around 93k USD, GameFi is like a rollercoaster – yesterday it was hyped with AI games, today it dumps because the devs ran away. Everyone thinks the biggest risk is token volatility or rug pulls from small projects. A big mistake. The real risk lies in putting all your eggs in one basket: a single game, a single chain, a local community. If the game collapses, the chain gets congested, and the community disintegrates – your wallet disappears without a sound. Back in August of this year, I saw a typical case on X: a friend staked everything in Pixels because of the land farming trend, then a new update caused the rewards to drop by 60%, he lost all 2k USD in just a week. It’s not about poor trading, but the lack of an exit strategy. Such things happen all the time: Axie 2022 hacked Ronin for 600 million, The Sandbox land prices plummeted in 2024 due to the metaverse hype deflating, Star Atlas delayed their roadmap in 2025 causing holders to panic sell. It's not just about losing money. These incidents make newcomers panic, thinking GameFi is all a scam, and guilds are just traps to farm tokens. Adoption dies young, the market contracts, and everyone just watches the red charts.
See original
APRO: Security Is Not Just a Promise, But Your Money Doesn't Disappear
At the end of 2025, when BTC is hovering around 93k USD, everyone thinks blockchain security is a matter for layer 1 or hardware wallets. Wrong. It's about whether data from the real world being fed into the chain is being distorted or not. Just a 2-second oracle delay, a fake price wick spreads, and a liquidation cascade wipes out the DeFi pool by tens of millions. This is no joke. That's real money, from real users, lost is lost completely.
Last November, Pyth Network had a slight lag on a small perp DEX, with an absurd price wick, leading to a liquidation cascade of 10 million USD. A new trader deposited 5k USD to try leveraging ETH, clicked long, and their wallet disappeared completely in just 30 seconds. It's not their fault. It's a system error: the oracle lacks anomaly detection, has no dispute mechanism, causing trust to shatter due to a lack of verification. Similar incidents have been ongoing: Pyth flicker 2023 arbitrage exploit 10 million, Band outage 2024 cross-chain sync fail 5 million loss, Chainlink delay 2022 on Aave causing liquidation of 50 million. It's not just about losing money. They kill adoption: newcomers come in, see data feeds like roulette, panic and run away, thinking crypto is all risk, and oracles are scams.
Last November, Pyth Network had a slight lag on a small perp DEX, with an absurd price wick, leading to a liquidation cascade of 10 million USD. A new trader deposited 5k USD to try leveraging ETH, clicked long, and their wallet disappeared completely in just 30 seconds. It's not their fault. It's a system error: the oracle lacks anomaly detection, has no dispute mechanism, causing trust to shatter due to a lack of verification. Similar incidents have been ongoing: Pyth flicker 2023 arbitrage exploit 10 million, Band outage 2024 cross-chain sync fail 5 million loss, Chainlink delay 2022 on Aave causing liquidation of 50 million. It's not just about losing money. They kill adoption: newcomers come in, see data feeds like roulette, panic and run away, thinking crypto is all risk, and oracles are scams.
Aggressive $15.6M ETH Short: Whale Borrows and Dumps 5,000 ETH
A major cryptocurrency whale has executed a swift and aggressive short-selling maneuver on Ethereum (ETH), borrowing a total of 5,000 ETH—valued at approximately $15.66 million—over the last two hours. $AAVE
The sequence of the transaction clearly indicates a coordinated short strategy. The whale first withdrew the 5,000 ETH from the Aave lending protocol. Subsequently, they immediately distributed the borrowed assets, transferring 4,000 ETH ($12.49 million) to Binance and 1,044 ETH ($3.26 million) to Bybit. The successful sale of the larger tranche on Binance was confirmed when the address withdrew $12.45 million in USDT—an amount nearly identical to the value of the 4,000 ETH deposited—just 40 minutes after the initial transfer. This calculated move signals a strong, bearish conviction on Ethereum’s immediate price action. $ETH
A major cryptocurrency whale has executed a swift and aggressive short-selling maneuver on Ethereum (ETH), borrowing a total of 5,000 ETH—valued at approximately $15.66 million—over the last two hours. $AAVE
The sequence of the transaction clearly indicates a coordinated short strategy. The whale first withdrew the 5,000 ETH from the Aave lending protocol. Subsequently, they immediately distributed the borrowed assets, transferring 4,000 ETH ($12.49 million) to Binance and 1,044 ETH ($3.26 million) to Bybit. The successful sale of the larger tranche on Binance was confirmed when the address withdrew $12.45 million in USDT—an amount nearly identical to the value of the 4,000 ETH deposited—just 40 minutes after the initial transfer. This calculated move signals a strong, bearish conviction on Ethereum’s immediate price action. $ETH
Login to explore more contents