Web3姑姑

🔥Playing with the big picture
🔥In the coin holding ranking of 'One Horse as Immortal',
🔥The addresses ranked 3rd / 4th / 5th,
🛫Have successively transferred: 81.96M

CZ leading the way, 👑🐎
This one horse has already pulled ahead. 🚀✨

One Horse as Immortal, far ahead!
#CZ #MEME @CZ

$Sight Today's airdrop is also quite disappointing! Luckily, the points aren't enough 😂#ALPHA #空投

Friends Meeting

Lead the race, far ahead!!

$CAI Good, went out to meet friends, forgot to grab it, don't feel too bad 😂😂😂😂 Now it's only worth a dozen dollars or so #ALPHA

Friends meeting

Today's airdrop is 4 points, 252 points, the estimated value is only this much, huh, are there still so many high scores? How many points do you guys get every day? Do you get 20 or 21 points every day, otherwise how come there are so many high scores ᥬ😂᭄ᥬ😂᭄ᥬ😂᭄#ALPHA #币安空投

$LISA this damn thing, how many people have been stuck while刷ing this, completely ruined, the dog casino has harvested again! Lucky I got out in time.

It's Monday again, time to continue enjoying airdrops! What score do you think is needed to get the meat 🥩? Based on previous trends, it should be at least over 240 points! #ALPHA #空投大毛

Yesterday, a technical but not uninteresting signal emerged on-chain: for the first time this year, Bitcoin's difficulty adjustment showed a reduction — miners have temporarily breathed a little easier as mining difficulty slightly dropped from its late 2025 peak to approximately 146.4T. For most people, this number sounds abstract, but it's far from trivial for miners.

Simply put: the Bitcoin protocol's automatic adjustment mechanism detected that the average block time was slightly faster (around 9.88 minutes), so it reduced difficulty slightly. This adjustment isn't designed to 'create a market move,' but rather to ease operational pressure on miners. After all, since the 2024 halving and the sharp rise in computing power and hardware investment in 2025, miners' profit margins have been under constant squeeze.

The issue is, this relief is temporary. On-chain tools predict that the next adjustment on January 22nd is likely to push difficulty back upward — indicating that mining competition won't vanish just because of a minor adjustment.

The underlying discussion is actually quite interesting:
🔥 Is the difficulty drop a sigh of relief for miners, or a signal of industry restructuring?
🔥 Is computing power truly declining, or is this just a temporary fluctuation?
🔥 Does a change in difficulty have any impact on BTC price?

What's your take? Is this a reduction in mining difficulty that lowers costs and eases supply pressure — a bullish signal for bulls? Or is it merely a technical adjustment with no real impact on market sentiment? Join the conversation below👇
#加密市场观察 $BTC

Yesterday, a 'retro-level' news emerged on-chain: an early Satoshi-era mining wallet (a very early Bitcoin holder) suddenly moved approximately 2,000 BTC (nearly $180 million) after being dormant for 15 months! This is the first activity of this scale since November 2024. On-chain analyst Julio Moreno points out that such old-chain movements often occur near market turning points.

This event instantly ignited community discussion:
Some say it's a signal of a big shark exiting
Others suggest it could be an OTC intermediary transaction or a secure migration
Some even started speculating whether a legendary early 'crypto figure' is finally cashing in their first fortune... (Of course, no one can confirm it's Satoshi himself)

Let's bring the perspective back to reality:
This transaction indeed originated from an extremely early wallet,
Historically, similar actions have almost always been accompanied by significant price movements near key nodes,
But on-chain movement ≠ selling pressure; often, it's address consolidation, moving to cold wallets, or OTC settlement.

Simply put, such 'old whales waking up' can certainly grab attention, but it doesn't necessarily mean a major crash or bull run. The real drivers of price and volume trends remain capital flows + long/short position structures + ETF fund fluctuations.

The question for you to discuss:
If this old coin movement is 'rebalancing', is it 'selling pressure first'?
Do you think such historic wallet activities truly signal market rhythm? 👇
#加密市场观察 #比特币2026年价格预测 $BTC

Today, a single statement has sparked intense discussion in the circle: Samson Mow publicly predicts that Elon Musk will "truly go all in on Bitcoin" in 2026, even betting on BTC reaching the $1.33 million level. This prophecy immediately exploded across social media.

In Mow's post, not only did he mention Musk possibly "going hard into BTC," but also laid out a series of bold visions, including Bitcoin reaching $1.33M, MicroStrategy soaring to $5,000, and a country issuing Bitcoin bonds. It sounds thrilling, but everyone knows this is more like a grand scenario projection than a confirmed event.

There are two key points worth discussing:
Musk's relationship with BTC has never truly been severed. He once had Tesla hold a large amount of BTC, then sold most of it due to environmental concerns, but his influence remains undeniable. In the past, a single word from him could trigger market volatility, and the market has emotional basis for speculating about his possible return.
Predictions like Mow's are inherently infused with future-oriented vision—they are not financial reports, exchange filings, or on-chain transaction evidence. They are more like high-probability hypothetical scenarios, requiring real capital movements and institutional dynamics to be validated.

So the current discussion is:
Is this a possible "catalyst storyline" for the future?
Or is it merely a high-risk, long-term opinion spectacle?

I believe such prophecies can spark imagination, but what truly moves the market is real money flow, disclosures, and on-chain activity—talk is talk, don't treat predictions as established facts. What do you think about whether Musk and BTC could really see a "second wave"? 🔥#加密市场观察 #比特币2026年价格预测 $BTC

​

The rhythm of Bitcoin spot ETFs has been quite interesting right after the start of this year — during the first full trading week of 2026, Spot BTC ETF experienced a net outflow of approximately $681M. This outflow occurred over four consecutive trading days (Tuesday to Friday), nearly erasing all the momentum from the two massive inflows seen just before the year-end, which had taken place in about half a day.

Last week, we saw significant inflows into ETFs, pushing BTC to briefly test above $95K, but as macro sentiment turned cautious, expectations for rate cuts cooled down, and geopolitical risks escalated, institutions and investors began showing a 'risk-off' trend. This risk-averse sentiment was directly reflected in the cash flows of spot ETFs.

Looking closer at the data, it's not just Bitcoin — Ethereum spot ETFs also recorded a net outflow of around $68M, indicating this adjustment isn't an isolated case for a single asset, but rather a broader 'risk asset correction'.

However, it's worth noting that even so, BTC's price remains above $90K, and the total asset size of ETFs remains substantial, suggesting the market hasn't completely panicked or sold off en masse. Inflows and outflows are more likely a rotation as investors reassess their risk appetite and allocation strategies, rather than a one-sided sell-off.

In summary: money is flowing in and out — not chaos, but the market is recalibrating its rhythm. ETF flows reflect not just risk appetite, but structural adjustments. #加密市场观察 #巨鲸动向 $BTC

The Year of the Horse hasn't truly started running yet,
🔥 the circle has already begun cultivating immortality.
🚀 Secluding oneself, enduring trials, ascending to immortality,
🛫 Though it's said in jest, it's actually a reason for oneself.
🎇 What spreads isn't mysticism, but the fact that the top figure was already there.
🌙 Fire Horse of Bing Wu, go with the flow,
🌞 'One horse 🐴 becomes immortal,' naturally connecting.
🌹 Not seeking ascension,
🐴 Just hoping you take this step and mount the horse yourself.
#一马当仙 #memecoin🚀🚀🚀

Just saw a significant development: Ripple has officially received licensing approval from the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), allowing it to expand its Ripple Payments licensing business in the UK. This covers the Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license and crypto-asset registration. In short, UK institutions can now use XRP for cross-border payments under a regulated framework.

Such a regulatory approval is no small matter in the crypto industry. On one hand, it adds solid weight to the long-standing 'compliance debate' around XRP — the FCA's review standards are rigorous, and passing such scrutiny signifies that XRP and its payment system have received functional recognition within a traditional financial hub.

On the other hand, it helps clearly position XRP's role from a mere trading asset toward a real payment infrastructure. UK institutional banks and payment service providers can now build cross-border settlement channels within compliant boundaries, theoretically moving beyond pilot programs or sandbox testing.

Of course, market prices may not immediately reflect this on the K-line, but from a long-term structural perspective, the establishment of such regulatory infrastructure helps lower the entry barrier for institutions and strengthens trust in partnerships. The clearer the compliance path, the more conducive it is for large-scale financial entities to participate — rather than solely interpreting XRP's value through speculation.

This FCA approval is not an isolated event, but rather a milestone in the global regulatory trend of integrating XRP into the traditional financial framework — turning 'on-chain liquidity' into a bridge usable for off-chain payments. This is worth understanding and paying attention to. #加密市场观察 #Xrp🔥🔥 $XRP

When discussing Solana's on-chain performance, don't just focus on price fluctuations— it's proving itself through 'real data.' Latest on-chain data shows that, despite the overall market being quiet, Solana's decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and on-chain liquidity have actually strengthened逆势, ranking at the top among all Layer-1 and Layer-2 networks. In recent periods, DEXs have processed transaction volumes totaling nearly $6.7 billion—a significant achievement in a volatile market.

What does this indicate? On one hand, it reflects sustained real-world demand: not driven by hype or short-lived trends, but by genuine user interactions with protocols that drive liquidity retention and conversion. Solana's high throughput and low transaction fees continue to be validated by leading DeFi protocols, market makers, and active traders.

On the other hand, open interest in the derivatives market is also expanding, reaching several billion dollars, indicating that more capital is willing to take on risk rather than just watching from the sidelines.

As an ecosystem momentum signal, Solana's combination of on-chain activity and deep liquidity often speaks louder than mere price movements. When the market cools down, what truly demonstrates value is on-chain user activity and real traffic—not just emotional speculation. Solana's current performance is indeed worth paying closer attention to during periods of market consolidation.
#加密市场观察 #Solana涨势分析 $SOL

Rise to immortality instantly

Ethereum's start to the new year has been much more active than many expected—quiet in terms of price movements, but vibrant in on-chain usage and ecosystem growth, marking a tangible milestone. According to on-chain data, Ethereum's total value locked (TVL) in application layers has broken through the $300 billion threshold. This is not just a number growing—it reflects deep participation of DeFi, staking, and Web3 applications on the ETH network.

What does the rise in TVL indicate? It's not merely an increase in wallet numbers, but real capital flowing into protocols and being actively used, rather than just superficial liquidity activity on trading platforms. This is driven by growing trust in liquid staking and DeFi protocols, as well as sustained momentum from developers continuing to build on Ethereum's mainnet and Layer 2 solutions.

Moreover, on-chain activity has reached new highs—daily active addresses and transaction counts are clearly rising, meaning more and more users are actively engaging with the ecosystem, rather than just staring at price charts.

This phase of growth, prioritizing usage over speculation, is a genuine signal of Ethereum's ecosystem health. In recent periods, ETH's price has remained relatively flat, yet the network's fundamentals have quietly strengthened—depth of ecosystem, protocol TVL, and user retention are metrics that matter more than mere price volatility.

In short, Ethereum isn't chasing bubbles—it's focusing on building its ecosystem and locking in capital. True value often begins with such silent accumulation, followed by tangible, sustainable trend development.
#加密市场观察 #ETH巨鲸动向 $ETH

Recently, Bitcoin ATMs have become a focal point of public attention again, but not because of increased usage—rather, due to growing concerns about fraud and regulation. In Missouri, the Attorney General's office has just announced an investigation into several companies operating Bitcoin ATMs, primarily focusing on complaints about hidden fees and misleading charges. Consumers report being 'tricked,' with unclear fund flows after depositing money, and regulatory scrutiny is intensifying.

Even more seriously, according to a recent FBI report, fraud losses related to Bitcoin ATMs in the U.S. alone exceeded $330 million in 2025—double the amount from the previous year. This figure is alarming, and the scams mostly involve social engineering tactics, such as impersonating government officials or technical support, luring victims into operating the machines.

To some extent, the 'popularity' of Bitcoin ATMs reflects two contradictory trends: on one hand, infrastructure coverage is expanding—global numbers of these machines continue to grow, and their convenience is undeniable; on the other hand, security, compliance, and transparency have failed to keep pace with this growth, leading to frequent fraud incidents and regulatory interventions.

Therefore, discussions about Bitcoin ATMs today should not focus solely on how many units exist or how close they are to us, but rather on what role these devices actually play in the real ecosystem: are they financial gateways, or easily exploitable 'cash channels'? Understanding this contradiction is more insightful than merely discussing price fluctuations, as it better captures the current market reality.

#加密市场观察 #美国讨论BTC战略储备 $BTC