safebsctoken
--
$Jager Jager and SafeBSC both charge a 5% fee, but the operational methods are completely different:
1) Value creation source
Jager: 5% tax is immediately distributed to traders/LP/burn → completely depends on volume.
SafeBSC: 70% tax creates a profit-generating treasury, 30% DCA BTC → has revenue outside of volume.
2) Burn
Jager: Strong burn when volume is high; low volume → burn decreases significantly.
SafeBSC: Daily yield burn, consistently maintained even when the market has low transactions.
3) Illustrative data (realistic assumptions):
If market volume drops significantly over 30 days:
Jager: burn & reward may decrease by ~70% (due to lack of transactions).
SafeBSC: burn still maintains ~80–90% thanks to treasury & BTC generating profit.
4) Conclusion
Jager: suitable when volume is high, easily weakens when the market slows.
SafeBSC: more sustainable because burn does not depend on volume but relies on yield + BTC.
This is just an analysis of the mechanism.
1) Value creation source
Jager: 5% tax is immediately distributed to traders/LP/burn → completely depends on volume.
SafeBSC: 70% tax creates a profit-generating treasury, 30% DCA BTC → has revenue outside of volume.
2) Burn
Jager: Strong burn when volume is high; low volume → burn decreases significantly.
SafeBSC: Daily yield burn, consistently maintained even when the market has low transactions.
3) Illustrative data (realistic assumptions):
If market volume drops significantly over 30 days:
Jager: burn & reward may decrease by ~70% (due to lack of transactions).
SafeBSC: burn still maintains ~80–90% thanks to treasury & BTC generating profit.
4) Conclusion
Jager: suitable when volume is high, easily weakens when the market slows.
SafeBSC: more sustainable because burn does not depend on volume but relies on yield + BTC.
This is just an analysis of the mechanism.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
0