In plain English: ISO20022đ
The new messages remove the shadows where sloppy reporting, hidden fees, miscoded transfers, and âcreative accountingâ once lived.
That part is absolutely fair discernment.
But hereâs the even bigger point
#ISO20022 doesnât directly expose fraud â
it forces the systems that receive the data to expose it.
Under MT, a message might say only:
âFunds transfer - details on file.â
Under ISO 20022, the same transaction must specify:
⢠exact source of funds
⢠exact economic purpose
⢠exact ownership structure
⢠exact intermediary chain
⢠exact fees, spreads, FX rates
⢠exact regulatory category
⢠exact counterparty information
Machine-readable â machine-auditable â machine-reconcilable.
The opacity dies, not because ISO 20022 accuses anyone,
but because everything is finally described in forensic detail.
This is the transparency upgrade.
This blows open hidden flows, skimming, off-ledger pools, errors, mismatches, misallocated collateral, etc.
Banks, correspondent networks, FX desks, and clearing houses have relied for decades on:
⢠omnibus accounts
⢠blended fee buckets
⢠net-settlement âsmoothingâ
⢠miscoded purpose fields
⢠internal suspense accounts
⢠delayed reconciliation
ISO 20022 wipes out the shadows where these techniques lived.
Not by accusation - but by precision.
The post-cutover world becomes deterministic, not probabilistic
Under MT:
âTrust us, it balances.â
Under ISO 20022:
âProve it. Every field. Every hop. Every custodian. Every fee. Every spread. Every timestamp.â
This is an audit-grade digital paper trail.
The only ones who fear this level of illumination are those who depend on opacity.


