The Classic Plasma Scaling Solution (Ethereum Layer 2 Framework, 2017–)This is the original concept introduced in 2017 by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and researcher Joseph Poon. It was designed as an off-chain scaling framework to solve Ethereum's early limitations in transaction throughput and cost. How it works: Plasma creates a tree-like structure of "child chains" (smaller, independent blockchains) anchored to the Ethereum mainnet (the "root chain"). Most transactions happen on these child chains for speed and low fees, while periodic commitments (summaries) and Merkle proofs are posted back to Ethereum for security.Key idea: It uses fraud proofs: if something malicious happens on a child chain, users can prove it and exit safely to the main chain.Goal: Enable massive scalability (thousands of TPS) for applications like payments, gaming, or DeFi without overloading Ethereum.Status today: Plasma as originally envisioned saw limited real-world adoption due to challenges like data availability, mass exits, and usability. It inspired many modern Layer 2 solutions (e.g., rollups like Optimistic and zk-Rollups became dominant instead). Ethereum.org still documents it as a historical scaling approach, but it's largely considered superseded by rollups in 2025–2026. 2. Plasma is the Modern Stablecoin-Focused Layer 1 Blockchain (Launched 2025, $XPL )This is a new, active crypto project that launched its mainnet in September 2025 and has gained significant attention (especially in late 2025 and into 2026). It's unrelated to the old Ethereum Plasma framework — the name was reused/rebranded for a purpose-built chain. What it is — A high-performance Layer 1 blockchain optimized specifically for stablecoin payments (especially USDT/Tether), not general-purpose smart contracts.Key features:Zero-fee (or near-zero) transfers for USD₮ (USDT)1,000+ transactions per second (TPS)Sub-12-second block times (some claims of <1s in marketing)Full EVM compatibility (you can deploy Ethereum smart contracts with no changes)Custom gas tokens (pay fees in stablecoins instead of native token)Confidential/private transactionsPlasmaBFT consensus (based on Fast HotStuff for fast finality)Integrates Bitcoin security in some designs (e.g., Bitcoin sidechain aspects or bridges planned for 2026)Native token → XPL (used for staking, governance, validator rewards, etc.)Backing & traction — Backed by notable names like Peter Thiel; strong ties to Tether/Bitfinex ecosystem. It quickly attracted billions in stablecoin deposits/TVL at launch (peaking high in late 2025), though it saw volatility (e.g., sharp price drops for XPL token post-hype).Positioning — Aims to power global instant payments with digital dollars, competing in the massive stablecoin economy (trillions in potential volume). It's marketed as infrastructure for a "trillion-dollar stablecoin network."Current status (as of Jan 2026) → Live mainnet, growing partnerships (100+ countries), ongoing upgrades (e.g., Bitcoin bridge, staking delegation planned for 2026). XPL token has had wild price swings but analysts discuss potential surges/recovery in 2026 based on adoption. @Plasma #Plasma
The original concept of the scaling solution of Plasma was introduced in 2017 by Vitalik and researcher Joseph Poon. It was designed as an off-chain scaling framework to solve Ethereum's early limitations in transaction throughput and cost.
But @Plasma right now is a new crypto project that launched its mainnet in Sept 2025 and has gained significant attention, which they are unrelated with the old Ethereum Plasma framework.
Many people might be confused, but they are two different things fundamentally. #Plasma is a high-performance Layer 1 blockchain optimized specifically for stablecoin payments, not general-purpose smart contracts. Their token $XPL can be used for staking, governance and validator rewards.
They have a lot of priorities in 2026, but I am wondering after live main-net and ongoing upgrades, what are the potential surges/recovery in 2026 based on adoption.
I just had a discussion with a candidate during an interview about the use of AI.
He asked me whether I think Binance Square should add an AI tool to help creators produce content on the platform.
My perspective is that AI should be used to assist people in creating better, higher-quality content, not to flood the platform with a massive amount of content or spam. The goal should always be to enhance creativity and value, rather than simply increasing quantity.
I am listening to the voice live broadcast "🍃Binance Seed Program: Cultivating Crypto Talent" at Binance Square, listen with me here: https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/cspa/23953910839409?r=851482311&l=en&uc=app_square_share_link&us=twitter
$ETH approaching $2,300, I think ETH is great, so I brought ETH at $4,000..😅
Trade live on Terminal with the community! Tokens are limited, but you can: 🔸 Share trades on the live chart 🔸Watch others' trades in real-time 🔸Compare performance and discuss crypto moves