Elon Jamess

Bitcoin is showing signs of stability this month, supported by a seasonal trend, since historically it has never recorded losses in both January and February consecutively.
Key Points
Bitcoin has fallen 12.55% in February, following a 10.16% drop in January, testing a long-standing seasonal pattern.Historically, February has rebounded after a losing January (observed in 2015, 2016, 2018, 2019, 2022).Extreme pessimism prevails: the crypto Fear & Greed Index hit 5 (lowest ever), and Bitcoin’s RSI at 15 signals oversold conditions.Short positions totaling $5.45 billion could be liquidated if Bitcoin rises to around $10,000, potentially triggering a short squeeze.Bitcoin trades well below the 50-day ($87K) and 200-day ($102K) moving averages, limiting immediate upside.Key support levels remain near $60K, with longer-term Fibonacci levels around $57K–$42K guiding potential downside.parapharse it
Historical Trends Put February in Focus
For reference Bitcoin is hovering around $68,789, down 12.55% so far in February. In January, it also recorded losses, dropping 10.16% over the month.
As a result, this back-to-back weakness has caught traders’ eyes since it goes against historical trends. Data shows that when Bitcoin ended January lower, February usually saw a rebound, as seen in 2015, 2016, 2018, 2019, and 2022.
This makes February a crucial month. If Bitcoin posts a second straight monthly loss, it would be the first time both January and February fell, breaking a long-established seasonal pattern.

Short-Term Price Action Shows Early Stabilization
Amid this situation, Bitcoin surged past $71,000 on Monday after sentiment took a big hit. The rebound happened during widespread pessimism in crypto, which often signals a potential short-term pause or stabilization.
In this scenario, some traders believe that high fear in the market might help Bitcoin hold the $60,000 area, seen as an important yearly support. Others warn that low liquidity and bearish futures positions could limit gains in the short term.
Extreme Fear Highlights Oversold Conditions
Market sentiment has reached unusually low levels. Michaël van de Poppe, founder of MN Capital, pointed out that the Crypto Fear & Greed Index fell to 5, marking its all-time low. At the same time, Bitcoin’s daily RSI dropped to 15, indicating the asset is heavily oversold.
Van de Poppe likened the current market to the 2018 bear market and the March 2020 COVID-19 crash. From these similarities, he suggested that Bitcoin might stabilize and start recovering without needing to drop back to $60,000 right away.
Liquidation Data Favors an Upside Squeeze
Looking past sentiment, derivatives data also point to a potential rebound. CoinGlass data shows that about $5.45 billion in short positions could be liquidated if Bitcoin climbs roughly $10,000.
In comparison, a move back to $60,000 would trigger about $2.4 billion in liquidations. This imbalance suggests upward price movement could force short sellers to close positions, potentially accelerating a rally through a short squeeze.

Indeed, such liquidation dynamics often play a decisive role during periods of heightened volatility.

Technical Structure Remains a Limiting Factor
Even with favorable seasonal and sentiment factors, Bitcoin’s overall technical picture is still weak. CryptoQuant data indicates it is trading far below major moving averages.
The 50-day moving average stands near $87,000, while the 200-day average is close to $102,000. This wide separation reflects an ongoing corrective phase following the previous rally.
Also, CryptoQuant’s Price Z-Score is at -1.6, showing Bitcoin is trading below its average. In the past, setups like this have usually resulted in longer consolidation rather than an instant trend reversal.
Derivatives Markets Signal Continued Caution
Derivatives activity further underscores ongoing caution. Crypto analyst Darkfrost noted that monthly net taker volume dropped sharply to -$272 million.
At the same time, Binance’s taker buy-sell ratio dropped below 1, showing that selling is currently stronger than buying. Futures trading still dominates over spot activity, meaning a lasting price increase will likely need more spot market demand. Without that, any recovery could stay fragile.
Longer-Term Levels Stay in Focus
Looking further ahead, Bitcoin investor Jelle highlighted past trends with Fibonacci retracement levels. In previous cycles, bear market lows often appeared below the 0.618 retracement level.
In the current cycle, that level is positioned near $57,000, with deeper downside projections extending toward $42,000 if historical patterns repeat. For now, however, these levels serve as longer-term reference points rather than immediate targets.

As February unfolds, attention remains fixed on whether Bitcoin can uphold its historical tendency toward recovery.
#Binance #squarecreator

Stablecoins were created to make money move faster cheaper and without banks in the middle. They work great for sending funds but when it comes to real shopping and daily spending there is still a big problem most projects avoid talking about. Once you send stablecoins there is no way back. The payment is instant and final. For shop owners this is perfect because there are no chargebacks no frozen balances and no surprise losses. But for normal people it feels risky.
With cards people are not thinking about how fast money settles. They think about safety. If a product does not arrive or a service is bad they can complain and the bank can reverse the payment. It is slow and sometimes annoying but it gives peace of mind. Stablecoins removed the middleman and made payments cheap and clean but they also removed protection. Now if something goes wrong there is nobody to fix it.
This is why trust is the real barrier to stablecoin adoption not speed and not fees. People will not use stablecoins for daily life if every payment feels like a gamble.
The idea is simple. Stablecoins will only go mainstream when payments can be final without feeling unfair. Users need the same everyday safety they are used to but without bringing back the broken chargeback system. Chargebacks cause fraud hurt merchants lock funds and cost billions every year. They are messy and often abused. But ignoring refunds completely is also not an option.
This is where the difference between chargebacks and refunds matters. A chargeback is forced by a bank. A refund is given by the merchant. That small difference changes everything. Refunds can be fast clean and transparent. They keep businesses in control while still protecting buyers.
Stablecoins actually fit refunds perfectly. What has been missing is simple refund tools built into payments. This is where programmable money becomes useful instead of just a buzzword. Payments can include rules like refund time limits partial refunds delivery confirmation and clear dispute steps that both sides agree to before paying.
The real challenge is adding protection without creating a new bank in the middle. If a central company controls reversals then stablecoins lose their whole purpose. The goal is neutral settlement with smart safeguards.
A well designed stablecoin system can offer things like temporary escrow where funds unlock after delivery merchant controlled refunds that leave clear records refund policies visible before payment and dispute handling based on agreed rules instead of last minute forced reversals. This keeps things fair without giving unlimited power to either side.
Stablecoins do not need chargebacks. They need modern refund design.
This is where Plasma stands out. Plasma is built around stablecoin payments as real business tools not just fast transfers. It focuses on what happens after money moves. Receipts tracking refund flows and post payment actions are part of the system.
Plasma is also clear that stablecoin payments are final by default. Setting the right expectations builds trust. When people understand how refunds work instead of assuming banks will fix things they feel safer using the system.
Refund design also helps with compliance. Clear refund trails clean records and transparent dispute outcomes make audits easier and reduce confusion. Regulators and finance teams want certainty and structured payment history provides that. This can be the difference between stablecoins becoming mainstream or staying niche.
This matters most for real world businesses not crypto traders. Everyday commerce depends on refunds. Online stores services travel subscriptions marketplaces restaurants all rely on clean reversals. No modern economy works without them. If stablecoins want to power daily spending refund logic is required.
If Plasma succeeds a normal payment could look like this. You pay with stablecoins get a clear receipt see refund rules upfront and if something goes wrong the merchant refunds instantly with full transparency. No banks no waiting weeks no fighting support. Merchants avoid fraud and customers feel protected.
The bigger shift is moving from transfers to commerce. Transfers are just money moving. Commerce includes expectations delivery service guarantees and corrections. Stablecoins solved speed but not business flow. Refunds are the bridge that turns crypto payments into real world money.
Stablecoins already won on cost and speed. What they lack is trust. Refunds are not extra features they are core infrastructure. Chargebacks were a broken solution to a real human fear. Plasma is trying to solve that fear cleanly without recreating the old system.
If Plasma gets this right stablecoins will stop feeling like risky transfers and start feeling like normal payments people can use every day. And that is when true adoption finally happens.
@Plasma #plasma $XPL

Most blockchains love to brag about being permanent once something is written it can never change
In crypto this sounds strong but in real finance this is not how the world works
In real systems rules move all the time
Governments update laws
risk teams change limits
compliance adds new checks
new countries bring new requirements
even inside one company policies shift as markets change
So the real problem in finance is not change
the real problem is how to change without breaking trust
This is where Vanar is thinking smarter than most chains
Why Frozen Smart Contracts Do Not Fit Real Finance
Crypto people love the idea that contracts can never be touched
but banks never work like that
banks run on living rules that are updated constantly
normal smart contracts force two bad choices
either redeploy again and again
or keep dangerous admin keys that scare users
every redeploy creates risk
bugs mistakes lost funds broken integrations and confusion
real financial infrastructure cannot operate this way
Vanar Treats Blockchain Like Real Software
in normal technology code and settings are separate
the engine stays stable
the rules can change safely
Vanar brings this same discipline on chain
instead of rewriting everything when rules change
you adjust approved parameters inside a stable structure
change becomes expected not dangerous
Dynamic Contracts Are The Core Idea of V23
Vanar V23 introduces dynamic contracts built from templates and adjustable rules
the template holds the main logic
the parameters hold things like
risk levels
loan limits
collateral rules
compliance thresholds
region controls
institutions can update policies without redeploying the whole contract
the system stays intact
only approved values change
just like real financial software works
Vanar even explains this can cut RWA adaptation cost by around sixty percent because you stop rebuilding products every time a rule changes
but more important than savings is direction
policy change becomes a built in feature
Why This Is Huge For Real World Assets
RWA sounds easy until you face reality
volatility rises so collateral rules tighten
audits add new compliance steps
countries change what is allowed
risk teams adjust exposure
with normal immutable contracts every change means new contract new address new migration
that is messy and risky
Vanar’s template system allows rules to evolve inside the same product
users do not move
auditors can track everything
developers stop rebuilding monthly
this turns on chain finance into real infrastructure
Policy As Code Comes On Chain
modern finance is moving toward policy as code
rules written as structured logic not messy documents
this allows
fast global updates
testing before changes
different rule sets for different regions
clear audit history
Vanar applies this directly to blockchain
compliance and risk become programmable
just like in large financial systems today
Less Redeploys Means Safer Systems
every redeploy is a danger window
new bugs
new attack surfaces
human mistakes
dynamic contracts reduce this massively
core logic stays stable
only limited parameters change
this does not remove risk
it contains it
teams get flexibility without chaos
Governance Becomes Structured Approval
Vanar Governance Proposal 2.0 turns governance into a rule approval layer
token holders can vote on system parameters
AI model rules
and protocol level policies
instead of emotional drama
you get recorded changes
what changed
when it changed
who approved it
this is how real institutions trust systems
Real Example Lending Product
imagine an on chain lending system
the code handles
loan creation
collateral tracking
repayment flow
that core should stay stable
but rules must change
loan to value ratios
risk scores
accepted collateral
regional limits
compliance conditions
with Vanar dynamic contracts you update policies not the product
users stay in the same contract
auditors see every update
developers stop rebuilding integrations
this is how finance scales in the real world
Why Vanar Feels More Grown Up Than Most Chains
most crypto projects chase hype
faster speed
lower fees
new buzzwords
Vanar is focused on operational reality
safe upgrades
clear policy control
audit trails
long term systems
banks and payment networks change constantly
but in controlled structured ways
Vanar mirrors that model on chain
Big Platforms Are Pointing Toward This Future
research from major platforms including Binance highlights that RWA will only scale if compliance and adaptable rule systems exist
speed alone is not enough
institutions need frameworks that evolve with regulation
exactly what Vanar is building
Real Trust Is Not About Never Changing
crypto often mixes up trust with immutability
real trust comes from
predictable behavior
transparent updates
controlled evolution
planes hospitals banks all change constantly
but safely
Vanar brings this same philosophy to blockchain
Final Thought
Vanar is not just another fast blockchain
it is building a system where finance can live long term
dynamic contracts
policy driven rules
auditable governance
safe upgrades
this is what real world assets and regulated money actually need
the chains that survive will not be the ones that never change
they will be the ones that change safely
and Vanar is building exactly for that future
@Vanarchain #Vanar
$VANRY

In many parts of the global south digital payments moved fast but cards never really mattered
Most people did not grow up using credit or debit cards
Banks were slow machines were costly and fees were high
Instead QR codes took over
You walk into a small shop a food stall a pharmacy or a bus stop
There is a printed QR code on the wall
You scan with your phone
You pay
You leave
This system is already normal for millions of people across southeast asia africa and other emerging regions
Mobile phones came first so mobile payments won
Now this is where Plasma enters the picture
With AliXPayGlobal USDT on Plasma can now be used at more than 34 million merchants
This covers markets malls taxis pharmacies online stores and small family businesses
Over 200 million users are already inside this payment network
The most important detail
The merchant does not deal with crypto
They receive local fiat instantly
No waiting
No price risk
No wallet setup
From the shop owners view it feels like normal money arriving in their account
Behind the scenes USDT on Plasma is settling the payment
This matters because merchants only care about simple things
Money should arrive fast
Fees should be clear
Nothing should disturb daily business
This setup solves all of that
The global south keeps skipping old systems again and again
There was no heavy card infrastructure
No terminals everywhere
So new payment systems fit in easily
A street vendor selling one dollar coffee does not need a card machine
They only need a phone and a QR code
That is all
This is why crypto payments especially stablecoins work better here than anywhere else
And let us be clear
34 million merchants is not small
This is serious scale
This is daily life level distribution
Millions of real transactions
Real people buying food transport medicine and services
As QR payments grow the Plasma ecosystem becomes stronger
More usage means more trust
More trust means more builders
Everything built on Plasma benefits from this growth
If XPL itself becomes part of these payment flows the impact grows even bigger
People will not just see it on charts or social media
They will see it at shops counters and taxis
That kind of visibility changes everything
Projects inside the ecosystem like lunaxpl also stand to gain
As more users move through Plasma
As real world usage increases
Attention naturally spreads
No hype needed
No fake stories
Just usage
This is how stablecoins stop being crypto only tools
And start becoming normal money
When people use USDT without thinking about blockchain
When payments feel natural
That is true adoption
Plasma and AliXPayGlobal together are pushing things in that direction
Quietly
Practically
At scale
This is not noise
This is infrastructure doing real work
@Plasma #plasma
$XPL

Most people think AI is smart because it answers fast or automates tasks. But when you actually work with AI over time you notice something frustrating. AI does not really move forward. It reacts. It performs. Then it forgets. When a session ends or an agent restarts everything disappears. Context is gone decisions are lost and the system starts again from zero.
This is not a mistake in design. It is how most AI systems are built. They are made to execute tasks not to remember history. Memory is treated as something temporary not something permanent. Because of this intelligence does not grow. It repeats. What looks like learning is often just repetition.
This is where Vanar quietly stepped in and solved a problem many people did not know how to explain yet.
Why AI Breaks When Time Matters
AI works fine in short conversations or single tasks. But when you want autonomy when you want agents to operate for days weeks or months everything falls apart. The moment an agent crashes pauses or restarts it forgets its goals. It forgets why it made choices. It forgets what failed before.
Without continuity AI hits a hard ceiling. It cannot evolve because it cannot carry experience forward. This is why many AI agents look impressive in demos but fragile in real use. They loop. They stall. They lose direction.
Vanar recognized that intelligence without memory is incomplete.
Neutron Changes How Memory Works
Neutron is Vanar response to this problem. Instead of treating memory like short term storage Neutron treats it like core infrastructure. Memory becomes persistent structured and independent from any single agent run.
This means an AI does not need to start over. It resumes. State intent past decisions priorities and lessons remain available even after downtime. If an agent stops it does not lose itself. It continues from where it left off.
This is not a small upgrade. It changes how autonomy works.
OpenClaw Shows Real Persistent Agents
OpenClaw agents using Neutron behave differently from normal AI systems. They do not repeat the same mistakes endlessly. They do not lose goals after interruption. They remember what mattered and why.
Neutron works like an external cognitive layer. A place where intelligence can live beyond execution cycles. Once you see this in action it becomes clear how limited most AI setups really are.
This is not about making AI sound smarter. It is about making AI grow over time.
MyNeutron And Personal Memory
The same idea does not stop with agents. MyNeutron applies persistent memory to people.
Instead of rebuilding context across ChatGPT Claude Gemini documents and tools your knowledge becomes portable. Conversations do not decay. Workflows do not reset. Memory compounds instead of fragmenting.
Knowledge stops being trapped inside platforms. It becomes something you carry forward.
Most users only realize how valuable this is after wasting months re explaining themselves to machines.
Why Anchoring Memory On Vanar Matters
Memory only works if it can be trusted. If state can disappear or change continuity breaks. This is why permanence matters.
Vanar anchors memory onchain when guarantees are needed. This gives confidence that history will still exist tomorrow. This is infrastructure level reliability not a feature toggle.
Systems like this do not announce themselves loudly. They integrate quietly. Then one day people realize they depend on them.
Vanar Is Not Chasing Hype
Many chains chase attention. Big claims fast narratives quick pumps.
Vanar is doing the opposite. It is solving a problem users only notice after experiencing its absence. Continuity.
This is why people call VANRY early or underappreciated. Not because of price but because of adoption timing. The network is ahead of where user awareness is.
By the time most people understand why persistent AI memory matters the infrastructure will already be in place.
The Role Of VANRY
VANRY is not just a token. It coordinates value across memory execution automation and interaction layers. As autonomous systems generate activity VANRY becomes the settlement and incentive layer that keeps everything running sustainably.
Research from major platforms including Binance has shown that infrastructure tokens gain value through real usage not hype. VANRY fits that model more than most AI labeled assets.
As memory driven agents scale so does coordination demand.
This Is About Years Not Months
If you are thinking short term Vanar will feel slow. There is no loud catalyst. No instant narrative.
But infrastructure rarely moves fast in public. It becomes normal before it becomes essential.
Vanar is building for persistence. AI that evolves instead of resets. Systems that remember. Humans who build once and extend over time.
In system design persistence usually wins.
That is what Vanar is betting on.
@Vanarchain #Vanar
$VANRY

Dusk Network is not trying to be famous as a privacy coin
Its goal is much bigger
Dusk wants to build the base system that real financial markets can use on a public blockchain
After more than six years of work Dusk launched its mainnet on January 7 2025
This launch was not the finish line
It was the beginning
Dusk is focused on making payments asset creation and settlement work on chain
Sensitive data stays private
But proof is always possible
Audits are allowed when required
After launch the team moved fast
They worked on regulated payments
Ethereum compatible smart contracts
New staking systems
And real world asset tokenization
By separating the blockchain into layers and adding cross chain connections Dusk aims to serve developers institutions and regulators together
Dusk Pay Making Legal Payments on Blockchain
One of the first big upgrades after mainnet was Dusk Pay
Dusk Pay is built for regulated payments
It uses a digital token linked to real money similar to a regulated stablecoin
People and institutions can send payments that are legally recognized
This makes it usable under European financial laws
Payments are faster and cheaper than traditional systems
But the most important part is compliance
Transaction details stay private for normal users
At the same time regulators can inspect the system when needed
This creates balance
Users get privacy
Authorities get control
Dusk Pay is designed for real daily use not just crypto experiments
Lightspeed Bringing Ethereum Style Smart Contracts
Developers already understand Ethereum
Dusk did not want to force them to relearn everything
So Dusk built Lightspeed
Lightspeed is compatible with Ethereum smart contracts
Developers can use familiar tools and languages
Smart contracts run on a separate execution layer
The main Dusk chain handles settlement security and privacy
This design allows upgrades without breaking the whole network
Today transactions finalize after a short delay
Future updates aim to make settlement nearly instant
Smart contracts on Dusk can stay private
Data is revealed only when proof is needed
For audits partners or regulators
With future bridges assets can move between Dusk Ethereum and Solana
Hyperstaking Making Staking Simple and Flexible
Staking is often complex and locked
Dusk changed this with hyperstaking
In hyperstaking smart contracts manage staking automatically
This allows staking pools
Users deposit tokens
Contracts handle rewards
Users earn staking rewards
And keep liquidity through derivative tokens
This turns staking into a financial tool
Not a technical task
Hyperstaking also allows reward sharing systems
Referral based participation
New incentive models
Dusk keeps traditional staking rules
There is a minimum stake
No maximum limit
Staked tokens activate after a short time
Unstaking has no penalties
New tokens are released slowly over decades
Rewards reduce over time
Validators who misbehave are suspended not destroyed
This supports long term network health
Zedger Bringing Real World Assets On Chain
Dusk is also focused on real world assets
This is where Zedger comes in
Zedger is built for assets that must follow laws
Stocks bonds funds and property
Zedger tokens know who can own them
Who can trade them
And who cannot
Investor identities are verified
Transfers are restricted
Rules are enforced by smart contracts
Real assets need more than transfers
They need dividends voting and legal actions
Zedger supports all of this
If a wallet is lost
Or a court orders a change
Authorized parties can move tokens safely
Only approved investors can hold these assets
This makes them usable financial instruments
Public and Private Transactions on One Network
Dusk supports two transaction types
Public transactions where balances and transfers are visible
Private transactions where sender receiver and amount are hidden
Private transactions use cryptography to prove validity
No cheating is possible
Users can reveal details later if required
For audits or compliance
Both transaction types live on the same blockchain
Assets can move between public and private modes
Without leaving the network
This allows transparency when needed
And confidentiality when required
Bridges and Cross Chain Connections
Dusk is moving toward a modular design
Bridges allow assets to move between
The settlement layer
And the smart contract layer
Private tokens must become public before crossing layers
Once bridged DUSK tokens pay fees and power smart contracts
Future upgrades will connect Dusk with Ethereum and Solana
At mainnet launch old tokens from other chains were burned
Replaced with native DUSK
This cleaned supply
Enabled staking
And strengthened the ecosystem
Ethereum compatibility helps attract developers
Who want privacy without losing tools
Why Dusk Network Matters
Finance needs privacy
But it also needs rules
Dusk is built for both
Users choose privacy or transparency
Payments follow regulations
Smart contracts provide proof
Staking stays liquid
Assets follow real laws
Separating settlement from execution makes upgrades safer
This mirrors traditional finance systems
With cross chain support Dusk assets can work with the wider crypto world
Final Thoughts
Dusk Network is not chasing hype
It is building real financial infrastructure
Private but auditable
Flexible but compliant
Payments smart contracts staking and real assets
All working together
Whether Dusk succeeds depends on real adoption
But the foundation built in 2025 and 2026 shows serious intent
Dusk is quietly building the future rails of on chain finance
@Dusk #Dusk
$DUSK

Bitcoin saw a sudden drop that almost pushed it to $60,000 before quickly bouncing back. Buying during the dip helped stabilize BTC around current prices, but this recovery by itself doesn’t signal a full trend reversal.
The move seems more like a brief pause in a larger correction, leaving investors uncertain if more losses could be coming.
This Is What Bitcoin Signals Suggest
A key sign of bear markets is a high Relative Unrealized Loss, showing how much value of coins is underwater compared to the total market cap. As Bitcoin fell toward $60,000, this ratio jumped to about 24%.
This level is well above the usual range where markets shift from bull to bear, signaling that the market is solidly in bearish territory.
Although the metric indicates a strong bear market, it’s still below the extreme capitulation levels usually above 50%. This means Bitcoin is in the middle of a capitulation phase, not at its ultimate bottom. Selling is still widespread, pointing to more volatility as the market finds balance.

Another way to view investor behavior is by looking at how Bitcoin is distributed across wallet sizes. Data shows that wallets with under 0.01 BTC are steadily gaining a larger share. These small retail holders usually react to price swings but are currently in accumulation mode.
Meanwhile, wallets holding 10 to 10,000 BTC have slightly reduced their holdings during the dip. This contrast is striking since social media sentiment continues to be strongly bearish.
Even with the gloomy talk everywhere, small investors are slowly increasing their positions, showing they see today’s prices as a good buying opportunity.

This gap shows sentiment hasn’t fully washed out yet. In stronger bear phases, retail selling usually matches the negative mood online. As long as small holders keep accumulating, short-term rebounds may have trouble holding and upside could stay limited.
Bitcoin Continues To Witness Support
Even with prices under pressure, on-chain activity is telling a different story. Bitcoin has recorded a strong jump in new addresses over the past week, with first-time users making transactions rising by about 37%, showing new participants are entering the network.
This increase shows that interest in Bitcoin remains strong even as prices pull back. New buyers often step in during volatile periods, hoping to get positioned early for a possible rebound.
Although it doesn’t promise a quick price jump, the growing number of active addresses points to continued belief in Bitcoin’s long-term value.

This wave of new users can help support prices during sideways periods. But if wider economic pressure continues, even solid network growth may not be enough to counter overall risk-off sentiment in global markets.
$BTC Price Levels To Watch
Bitcoin is trading around $69,077 after bouncing from the $63,007 support zone during the recent drop. Strong dip buying stopped a fall toward $60,000, showing solid short-term demand at lower prices.
Even with the rebound, downside risk is still high. The wider market environment points to possible further weakness in the weeks ahead. If the $63,007 level breaks, it could confirm a bearish move, with the next key support around $55,500 based on past price zones.

A brief rebound is still possible if new money keeps flowing in. Growing address activity could help Bitcoin hold steady and push back above $71,672 as support. Holding that level would ease the short-term bearish outlook, even if the wider bear trend remains in place.
#Binance #squarecreator #bitcoin