Crypto PM

Many crypto projects love to say real world assets are coming on chain. It sound powerful and future heavy. But most people never ask what that really mean in practice. Real markets are not only about buying and selling. They are about documents rules investors limits reporting audits liability and boring processes nobody tweet about.

If any of those parts are missing then the asset is not truly tokenized. It is just a token wearing a security costume. Dusk understand this difference and that already separate it from most DeFi style RWA narratives.

ALSO READ: Dusk And Why Privacy Alone Was Never Enough
Privacy Is Not The Headline But The Tool

People think Dusk main value is privacy. That is only half true. Privacy is not the destination it is the requirement. The real contribution is that regulations live inside the asset itself and sensitive data is not exposed by default.

Dusk feels closer to market infrastructure than DeFi playground. It is a blockchain for regulated finance where institutional workflows can move on chain without breaking compliance or performance expectations.

XSC Is The Quiet Centerpiece

The most overlooked part of Dusk is the asset standard. XSC the Confidential Security Contract. This is not marketing fluff. It is template for issuing regulated securities with privacy and rules baked in.

Securities are not simple tokens. They have ownership rules transfer limits voting logic dividend conditions redemption terms. XSC allow issuers to encode these rules directly into contract logic.

This is important because compliance should not live off chain as manual enforcement. When rules live inside the asset you reduce human error and off chain friction. XSC is like ERC20 but designed for real securities not memes.

Regulated Markets Run On Privacy Not Publicity

Equity markets do not show everyone balances and wallet addresses. Full transparency would destroy fairness. It would enable surveillance and manipulation.

Dusk recognize that asset level confidentiality is required not just transfer privacy. Issuers investors regulators all need different visibility. Dusk aim to provide privacy by default and proof when required.

This is not secrecy as rebellion. It is privacy as normal finance behavior.

Modular Infrastructure Built For Institutions

Another subtle but big shift is Dusk modular architecture. Instead of one monolithic chain they define DuskDS as settlement consensus and data availability layer. On top sit DuskVM and DuskEVM.

Institutions do not want to bet everything on one virtual machine forever. They want stable settlement layer and flexible execution environments. DuskDS provide that.

With components like Rusk Kadcast staking and transfer contracts the stack feel more like financial platform than experimental chain.

Security Is Treated As Obligation Not Option

In DeFi culture bugs are tolerated until disaster. Institutions cannot afford that. A failed validator or broken deployment is legal and operational nightmare.

Dusk operator docs make slashing real. Validators that go offline or submit bad blocks lose stake. Soft and hard slashing exist. This push validators toward professional behavior not hobby farming.

This is not friendly staking. This is responsibility staking.

Long Term Security Not Short Hype

Dusk supply plan reflect long thinking. Initial supply 500M DUSK with another 500M issued over 36 years through staking. Max supply 1 billion.

This is not pump tokenomics. This is security funding across decades. Stock exchanges settlement systems think in decades not quarters. Dusk align with that mindset.

Adoption Through Controlled Markets Not Chaos

The real adoption signal is not retail hype. It is controlled partnerships. Dusk partnerships with regulated exchanges like NPEX and later 21X with DLT TSS license show real world messiness.

Licenses compliance negotiations slow rollout none of that is sexy. But that is how regulated adoption happen.

These partnerships mean Dusk is walking orthodox path not shortcut.

What This Enables In Practice

Imagine small company issuing bond on chain. Investor list private coupon payments automated transfers limited to qualified buyers regulators get reports accountants audit flows.

Dusk want entire workflow native on chain. Asset with embedded compliance rules settlement layer built for reliability execution environments tailored per use case.

This is the real story. Not hiding everything. Not exposing everything. But controlled visibility.

The Question That Matters Now

Infrastructure alone is not enough. Will ecosystem build products. Will issuers issue. Will trading happen. Will settlement work under stress.

Dusk now enter performance phase. Theory done execution remain.

If Dusk succeed it stop being privacy project. It become financial infrastructure.

my take

I think Dusk is building something most crypto people underestimate because it is slow procedural and boring. But finance is boring. The risk is huge adoption risk tooling friction regulatory drag. But the direction make sense. Tokenization without compliance is cosplay. Dusk at least acknowledge reality. If they can get real issuance real trading real settlement then it become rare thing in crypto. Not exciting. But real.

@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Almost every blockchain start with same sentence. Open permissionless decentralized from day one. It sound good on paper and sound better on twitter. But when real systems arrive payments uptime compliance business contracts those promises crack very fast. Vanar Chain is not trying to win romance points. It choose a slower colder path. Stability first decentralization later.

This is not a new idea if you look outside crypto. Internet cloud fintech all started centralized then spread trust slowly. Vanar copy that pattern instead of pretending purity from block zero.

ALSO READ: Vanar Chain And The Strange Idea That Data Should Actually Think

The Trust Ladder Philosophy

Vanar describe its design as a trust ladder. At the start there are few known validators spread globally who are tested trusted and monitored. As they prove good behavior more validators are added. Reputation matter more and more over time.

Many chains say progressive decentralization. Vanar actually write it into consensus design. That difference matter. One is slogan other is structure.

Not Gambling On Stake Alone

Most chains reduce security to one thing. Capital locked. Who has most money win influence. Vanar reject that as only signal. Instead it combine Proof of Authority with Proof of Reputation.

In early phase Vanar Foundation operate validators. Later external validators join based on reputation performance and behavior. Capital matter but it is not everything.

This ask different question. Who behaved well over time instead of who bought most tokens yesterday. This reduce risks like rented stake short term capture or influence games.

Why This Makes Sense For Payments And Business

Crypto culture hate Proof of Authority. It feel permissioned. But real business care about uptime finality predictable behavior not ideology purity.

Vanar understand that early stage network need operational stability. According to their docs foundation validators first then reputation validators expand network. This align with payment focused use cases.

PoA is not forever goal it is training wheels. The real goal is enterprise grade behavior as network scale.

Compatibility Beats Reinvention

One quiet truth in Web3. Developer time is the real graveyard. Great tech die because builders must relearn everything.

Vanar choose compatibility strategy. Builders bring what they already know. Same tools same stacks same flows. They ship faster.

AI and data layers may be long term differentiator but compatibility is short term bridge. Without bridge no apps come.

Neutron Storage Is Not About Compression Bragging

People talk about Neutron compression numbers 25MB to 50KB. That is flashy but not most important part.

Important detail is storage model. Neutron Seeds can live off chain for performance but anchored on chain for integrity ownership and verification.

This hybrid approach is pragmatic. Heavy data move fast light proofs stay permanent. Vanar is not chasing purity it chase usability.

This is easier to adopt than forcing everything on chain and pretending performance does not matter.

Kayon Turns Compliance Into Software

Most systems treat compliance as manual process. Checklists back office human review. Vanar want compliance to be software.

Kayon is reasoning layer that allow natural language queries rule checking and automation across Neutron blockchains and enterprise systems.

Compliance become something you ask not something you manually do. Data itself answer questions.

This is not AI buzzword. This is turning governance verification and reporting into programmable surface.

If it work it will be used in boring places audits disputes reporting payment checks. And boring places hold budgets.

Staking Is Security Not Yield Farm

Vanar position staking as obvious thing. Stake support network get rewarded. Not casino yield.

Staking is one signal among many. Over time reputation will matter more. Capital alone will not dominate.

This design hint future where validator access depend on consistency not just wallet size.

Ecosystem Built Quietly With Builders

Vanar ecosystem strategy is not loud partnership list. Kickstart page show real projects perks support.

Ecosystem grow when builders ship users come feedback loop improve stack credibility increase. Simple but hard.

Most infra fail not because tech bad but because building is painful. Vanar try reduce that pain.

Systems That Can Explain Themselves

Trust problem exist in crypto and AI. Combined it double.

Vanar aim to build systems that can answer why. Why payment approved why rule triggered why document valid.

These explanations are mandatory in real world. Courts auditors businesses require them.

Vanar architecture push toward verifiable data reusable logic explainable decisions. This separate demo from deployable system.

The Real Bet Vanar Is Making

Vanar bet next Web3 phase look like invisible infrastructure not speculation playground. Predictable validation readable data compliant logic builder friendly tools.

If you want simple test do not ask is it exciting. Ask does it reduce friction in real systems.

Vanar is building trust step by step. That is not loud strategy but it is serious one.

my take

I think Vanar is choosing hardest road in crypto. No hype no instant decentralization flex. Execution risk is huge. Reputation systems are complex. Adoption is slow. But philosophy make sense. Real money systems do not start perfect they start stable. If Vanar can keep discipline and not drift toward noise it might become invisible infrastructure. And invisible infra usually win quietly while loud projects fade.

@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY

Most people still imagine blockchains as apps. NFT games DeFi casinos meme tokens identity layers world computers all mashed together. Plasma XPL does not chase that dream. Plasma take a much narrower road. It focus on one thing only, settlement of stablecoins at internet scale. Not speculation not gaming not vibes. Just money rails.

Stablecoins already act like digital dollars. They move across borders power remittances commerce payroll and savings. Hundreds of billions in supply trillions in monthly flows. This is not theory anymore. The strange part is that most of this activity happens on chains that were never designed for stablecoins in first place.

ALSO READ: Plasma And The Unsexy Mission Of Making Stablecoins Feel Like Money
Stablecoins Are Treated Like Guests Not Citizens

On Ethereum Tron or Bitcoin linked systems users still need gas tokens. ETH TRX whatever. Fees change congestion appear micro payments break. Sending stablecoins feel like operating backend software not like using money.

Plasma start with simple observation. If stablecoins are becoming money then the chain under them must treat them as first class economic primitives. Not as token slot experiment. This idea drives everything in Plasma design from consensus to tokenomics.

Zero Fee Transfers Is UX Not Marketing

Free USDT transfers sound like slogan but Plasma mean it structurally. The protocol itself handles gas so users do not need native tokens to send stablecoins. You open wallet send USDT and done. No extra balance no mental overhead.

This is not about cheap. It is about removing friction. Fee friction blocks adoption especially for small frequent payments. When people need ETH just in case stablecoins stop feeling like money. Plasma remove that friction at protocol level.

Built For Scale And Reliability Not Drama

Plasma use PlasmaBFT based on Fast HotStuff F-BFT. Sub second finality high throughput thousands TPS. This is what payment rails require not what twitter require.

On execution side Plasma use Reth EVM client. Developers use MetaMask Hardhat Solidity Foundry same tools. No new paradigm no rewrite pain. Plasma become programmable money not just transfer chain.

Flexible Gas Models That Match Real Life

Another underrated choice is custom gas logic. Users can pay fees using assets they already hold like USDT or BTC instead of XPL. This reduce friction between digital money and real life use.

Wallets merchants on ramps off ramps all become simpler. Plasma clearly think beyond trading into money systems. That is long term thinking not short term pump.

Trust Anchored To Bitcoin Not Claims

Plasma security story lean on Bitcoin. A trust minimized Bitcoin bridge allow BTC representation like pBTC. Plasma sync state roots to Bitcoin regularly. This borrow Bitcoin trust without sacrificing performance.

Many chains worship decentralization as slogan. Plasma choose trust durability. For stablecoins censorship resistance and robustness matter more than ideology purity.

Real Usage Signals Already Appearing

Plasma mainnet beta launched September 25 2025. Two billion stablecoins day one. That is not normal launch number. It signal demand for this type of rail.

Plasma also connect with NEAR Intents cross chain liquidity 25 chains 125 assets. This place Plasma inside larger settlement fabric not isolated island.

DeFi frameworks like Pendle integrated. Yield fixed income structures appear. This push Plasma beyond payments into serious finance without turning it into casino.

XPL Token Is Coordination Tool Not Lottery

XPL is native token but role is different. Starting supply 10 billion. 40 percent ecosystem development 10 percent public sale rest team and stakeholders with vesting.

Staking activate inflation only when network used. Security grow with usage. XPL is not hype fuel. It coordinate validators incentives upgrades governance.

This design allow zero fee stablecoin transfers without pretending network free. Costs exist but handled by architecture not dumped on user sending twenty dollars.

From Blockchain To Real Life Money

Plasma One and ecosystem products push vision further. Neobanks cards yield savings cashback. This bring stablecoins into daily life for people with zero crypto knowledge.

This matter because adoption happen when money rails connect to life not dev tools.

A Different Question Than Most Chains Ask

Plasma is not asking how fast can we trade. It ask what should money feel like. Predictable accessible boring reliable.

Zero cost transfers custom gas Bitcoin anchored security programmable EVM compatible stablecoin first design.

This is infrastructure mindset not market mindset.

my take

I think Plasma XPL is doing something many builders avoid because it is not glamorous. Stablecoin rails do not trend. But they move real value. Execution risk is real sustainability model must hold competition is brutal. Tron L2s everyone chasing same flows. But Plasma focus is sharp. Stablecoins already solved global money Plasma try to solve usability trust and integration. If it works people will not know Plasma name they will just send money and that is probably the point.

@Plasma #Plasma $XPL

Most crypto privacy projects sell one dream only. Privacy. Hide everything. No one sees anything. That sound cool until you ask a harder question. How do markets work like this. How do funds companies regulated products operate when everything is public or everything is totally hidden. This tension is why privacy became a trap in crypto.

When privacy is optional nobody uses it and the chain stay public. When privacy is absolute institutions panic because they need rules audits reports proof. Dusk is trying to escape this trap by building somewhere else entirely.

ALSO READ: Dusk Network And The Uncomfortable Truth About Real Finance
Privacy Plus Proof Not Privacy Versus Proof

Dusk is a Layer 1 with confidential smart contracts. Transactions are private by default but proofs can be revealed when required. This is the core idea. Privacy plus proof. Not privacy against proof.

The thesis is simple but strong. Users should be protected by privacy not by falsehood. That alone separate Dusk from privacy coins that chase anonymity at all cost.

Privacy Is Market Hygiene Not Luxury

In real finance privacy is not a bonus. It is hygiene. If all trades bids balances and contract terms are public in real time markets break. You get front running copy trading intimidation and information warfare. Public by default chains reward the richest watchers.

But regulators still need access. Courts need evidence. Auditors need records. Issuers need compliance. Dusk aim to mirror how real markets work. Discreet by default provable when necessary. That is very different from total anonymity.

Why Confidential Smart Contracts Matter

Most chains can hide transfers but business is not transfers. Business is logic. If X then Y. If identity verified then trade. If collateral enough then settle.

Dusk support confidential smart contracts meaning logic can run while sensitive inputs stay hidden. You can put real financial logic on chain without publishing private information to the internet.

This matter because valuable things should never be public. Salaries cap tables bond terms OTC trades company financials. The world does not want an open ledger HR system.

Validator Privacy Is Also Critical

Many people miss this. Hiding users is not enough. If validator selection is public powerful actors can game it.

Dusk uses Segregated Byzantine Agreement with Proof of Blind Bid. Validators bid blindly to lead blocks. Identity and bid stay hidden. This reduce targeting bribery and attacks.

The philosophy is clear. Privacy is infrastructure not a feature toggle.

From Theory To Real Blocks

Dusk moved from research to mainnet. On ramp contracts activated December 20 2024. Mainnet cluster December 29. First immutable block January 7.

This matter because now promises become execution. Developers experience tooling incentives security upgrades and real apps decide outcome not whitepapers.

The Token As Security Budget Not Stock

The DUSK token is not equity. It is fuel and insurance. Staking secure the network. Minimum stake around 1000 DUSK maturity and unstaking rules exist.

Blind bid staking act as market filter. You are not just locking coins you are competing under hidden rules. This reduce whale advantage and improve fairness.

Auditability Beyond Regulators

Auditability is not only for regulators. Developers and users also need to trust code. Dusk invest in verifiable builds reproducible outputs versioning. This is boring work but builds trust over time.

Institutions think like this. They want to explain test and defend systems not just admire innovation.

What Dusk Is Not Trying To Be

Dusk is not meme chain. Not DeFi playground. Not copy paste liquidation casino. It is built for controlled assets regulated markets private settlement business grade contracts.

The market is splitting. Open everything crypto and regulated on chain finance. Dusk bet on second lane.

The Hard Part Adoption

Technology is not biggest risk adoption is. Institutions move slow. Privacy tech is complex. Liquidity need incentives. Builders resist change.

Also marketing is hard. Dusk story is subtle not slogan friendly. Privacy by default provable when needed is system not meme.

What Success Would Look Like

Success mean real apps where privacy is default. Markets prefer Dusk because safer. Selective disclosure feel natural not surveillance.

Dusk is not trying escape system. It try protect people while still allowing truth when required.

That is rare bet in crypto.

my take

I think Dusk is doing something most crypto avoid because it is hard to explain and slow to adopt. But it match reality. Regulation is not going away. Privacy without proof is fantasy. Proof without privacy is dangerous. Execution and tooling will decide everything. If Dusk can make this simple for developers it could become serious infrastructure. If not it stay great idea loved by researchers only. But direction is correct and that already make it worth watching.

@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Most blockchains today try to be all things at once. Payments DeFi NFTs games identity even world computer fantasies. They stretch themselves thin and then wonder why nothing feel simple. Plasma does not try to do that. Plasma begin from one uncomfortable truth. Stablecoins already won. USDT already act like the dollar of the internet. People send it save it settle across borders every day. The problem is not demand. The problem is infrastructure.

Sending stablecoins today still feel like developer console. Extra gas tokens fees spike at bad times and the user need to think too much. Real money should not ask this many questions. Plasma exist because of this pain not because of hype.

ALSO READ: Plasma And The Radical Idea Of Money Not Moving
Stablecoins Do Not Care About Crypto Narratives

The thesis Plasma push is simple but unpopular. Stablecoin users do not care about crypto hype. People do not wake up wanting gas tokens. They want fast transfers predictable cost and money without drama. Stablecoins already give price stability and global reach but most chains are not optimized for them at all.

Plasma believe that if stablecoins are internet money then the chain under them must treat them as first class citizens not side experiments. That is why Plasma describe itself as stablecoin native not generic.

Free USDT Transfers Is Not Marketing Trick

Free USDT transfers sound like marketing until you think deeper. The goal is not just cheaper. The goal is removing mental tax. When a user need ETH or TRX or SOL just in case it stop feeling like money. It feel like application dependency.

Plasma documentation explain that fee friction block adoption especially for small and frequent payments. Removing fees allow micro payments subscriptions daily commerce flows. Wallets become simpler. People stop thinking about gas.

Payments Need To Be Programmable Too

Payments alone are not enough. Stablecoin rails must be programmable. Plasma support full EVM compatibility so developers can use existing tools without reinventing wheel. This matter a lot.

Future stablecoin economy is not only send USDT. It is payroll splitting savings merchant settlement subscriptions refunds escrow marketplaces. Programmable money but still stable.

Plasma try to close gap between payments and smart contracts instead of forcing choice.

Anchoring Trust To Bitcoin Not Speed Claims

Speed is easy to sell trust is not. Plasma anchor security story to Bitcoin using trust reduced Bitcoin bridge. Bitcoin is slow not expressive but trusted. Plasma borrow that trust and add modern payment experience.

The logic is simple. If stablecoins are real money they need serious settlement and security story. Bitcoin give that foundation.

XPL Is Coordination Not Hype Fuel

XPL is native token of Plasma but its role is different. Users live in stablecoins but network need incentives security governance. XPL coordinate validator rewards and network economics without forcing users to speculate.

That is why Plasma can offer zero fee stablecoin transfers. The cost exist but it is handled by architecture not dumped on someone sending twenty dollars to family.

Adoption Happens In Plumbing Layer First

Real adoption does not start with memes. It start with custody settlement partners. Cobo integration is big signal. Custodians care about reliability not hype.

When custodians integrate Plasma with USDT0 zero transfer cost it show Plasma aim to win plumbing layer. Plumbing adoption always start with institutions then reach users quietly.

Making Stablecoins Invisible

Plasma goal is not convince users to learn new chain. It hide the chain. Open wallet send digital dollars done. That is it.

Education content focus on usefulness speed instant confirmations coin first thinking. If Plasma succeed it will not look exciting. It will look normal.

And that is powerful.

Risks That Do Not Kill The Thesis

There are real risks. Stablecoin first mean stablecoin dependent. Regulation issuer policy market structure could change. Plasma say inclusive stablecoin strategy but USDT first still risk.

Free transfers raise sustainability questions. Someone pay for security spam protection. Plasma rely on architecture token economics but real test come in production.

Competition is brutal. Tron dominate USDT transfers L2s improving fast. Plasma bet specialization beat generalization.

These risks raise bar but do not break idea. Money rails are infrastructure not memes.

Why Builders Should Care

Plasma try to make stablecoins behave like real internet payment layer. Stablecoin first contracts zero fee USDT EVM programmability Bitcoin anchored security.

The value is not novelty. It is focus. Focus win long term.

my take

I think Plasma is boring in best way. It does not try impress crypto twitter. It try fix obvious problem people already feel when sending stablecoins. Execution risk is real. Sustainability model must prove itself. Competition is heavy. But the thesis is clean. Stablecoins already solved global money Plasma trying to solve usability. If it work people will not talk about Plasma they will just use money. And that silence is probably the success metric.

@Plasma #Plasma $XPL

Most blockchains today feel like receipts. You can prove something arrived you can prove it existed you can prove a hash match. But that is where it stop. The moment you want to actually use that data you must take it off chain rebuild context rebuild logic rebuild meaning. That is exhausting and honestly broken.

Vanar Chain start from a very different assumption. If apps are not run by humans clicking buttons but by AI agents acting all day long then the chain cannot only execute. It must remember understand and reason. That is not how most chains are built.

ALSO READ: Vanar And The Future Nobody Is Cheering For Yet

The Real Problem Is Dead Files And Broken Context

Web3 love proofs. IPFS PDF invoices hashes immutable storage. But meaning is missing. A PDF invoice may be stored forever but the chain cannot answer basic questions. Is this invoice paid. Is it compliant. Who is allowed to see it. What changed since last month.

Those are meaning questions. Most chains were never built to answer them. They only verify integrity not understanding. Vanar focus exactly here.

Betting On Agents Not Wallet Clickers

Vanar openly bet that the next wave of apps will not be humans signing transactions. It will be AI agents running checks verifying rules settling payments and updating states at scale. For that to work data must be decision ready not just stored.

This require queryable data. Structured meaning. Context preserved on chain. That is radical shift.

Neutron And Turning Files Into Seeds

Neutron is Vanar answer to dead data. It does not store full files. It compress unstructured data into small objects called Seeds. These Seeds keep meaning not just bytes.

According to Vanar Neutron can reduce 25MB document into around 50KB. These Seeds live fully on chain and can be verified queried and used by apps and agents.

This is not compression for storage it is semantic compression. Data become object not blob.

Data To Object Pipeline Changes Automation

If this work Neutron turn raw documents into organized objects that programs can directly query. No need to read PDFs off chain. An agent can ask a Seed if invoice is paid if contract valid if rules changed.

That expand what is automatable massively. Instead of store proof compute elsewhere Vanar push meaning on chain and compute decisions there.

Kayon Makes Reasoning Native

Making data small is not enough. Kayon is reasoning layer. It allow natural language queries contextual checks and compliance automation over Neutron.

Most projects bolt AI onto apps. Vanar embed AI into the stack. Logic is not simple if else. It become context aware reasoning.

Vanar describe Kayon like a business intelligence assistant that read data and answer questions. This is big difference from dumb smart contracts.

Chain As Place Where Data Is Understood

Vanar prefer chain where data is comprehended and acted upon not just referenced. That is philosophical shift. Data does not exist it function.

Their own language show this. Seeds are semantic objects. Data act like software components small testable reusable.

PayFi Is The Distribution Strategy

Many AI blockchain stories stay abstract. Vanar anchor itself in payments. PayFi settlement commerce.

The collaboration with Worldpay is biggest signal. Worldpay handle trillions of payments globally. This push Web3 payments into real rails.

Payments show friction immediately. If Vanar can handle crypto in compliance checks settlement and fiat out smoothly that matter more than TPS claims.

Predictable Fees Matter For Agents

Vanar emphasize fixed low fees. This is not sexy but critical. AI agents executing thousands of actions cannot handle volatile fees.

Predictable cost enable automation. Without it agents break. This is invisible to retail but obvious to system designers.

TVK To VANRY Was Not Cosmetic

Vanar rebrand from TVK to VANRY was 1 to 1 swap. Exchanges supported it. This was not marketing trick. It marked pivot to chain first AI native story.

Neutron Kayon PayFi together form new stack. New name follow new direction.

Making Data Act Like Software

This part is easy to miss. Vanar is not storage network. It want data to be usable composable queryable.

When that click everything change. On chain stop being archive and start being intelligent layer.

How To Judge Vanar Honestly

Do not judge by buzzwords. Judge by tools. Are developers using Neutron Seeds for real documents. Do agents retrieve them reliably. Does compliance automation reduce steps. Does PayFi reduce checkout friction.

If yes Vanar story make sense. If not it stay theory.

my take

I think Vanar is aiming at future most people not ready for. It is not hype friendly and not retail flashy. Execution risk is massive. Building intelligent data layer is hard. But direction is sharp. Blockchains that only store will be replaced by blockchains that understand. If Vanar succeed it will not feel exciting. It will feel invisible. And invisible infrastructure is usually the one that win.

@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY