tcpmarket

A cycle of articles.
PLEASE LIKE THIS AND SUBSCRIBE.
Part 1. Why humanity still thinks in terms of money raises the question: “How else could we think?”
With you, Nastya, and TCP-MARKET
When I first started working on the concept of TCP-MARKET, it seemed to me that the main task was to create a more convenient system for international settlements. But the deeper I went into economics, the more often I caught myself thinking that maybe we’re looking for answers to the wrong questions.

With you I am Nastya and TCP-MARKET
The most common question we are asked is WHY create a TCP-MARKET (TCPcredit and what is it in general?). So, if you look at the market (from anywhere in the world), there are already so many new tokens with different names, but essentially repeating each other and having dubious value both as a token itself and as the product it provides. There are enough of them for humanity for the next two hundred years, and creating yet another token just to put a beautiful word “innovation” in the Whitepaper, in my opinion, is simply meaningless. Either it’s an outright scam or speculation—both aimed at a single goal: to squeeze (“bleed out”) the user. Even taking a quick look at the market of existing coins and products they provide, it’s obvious that the value of the product at all is not being investigated. And the coin is traded either due to some random factor or with a clear speculative component (hence PAMP/DAMP).

Nastya and TCP-MARKET
In the previous parts, I said that money is probably not the value itself. They only allow a person to preserve the ability to meet their future needs. But today I want to ask a different, very simple question.
Who do your money actually belong to?

Nastia | TCP-MARKET
Imagine an unusual situation.
You met a person you’ve known for many years.
He is honest.
Always keeps his promises.
I’ve never let you down.
He asks to borrow a small sum of money and promises to pay it back in a month.
Most people will agree.
. Why?

Nastya and TCP-MARKET.
Please hit like and subscribe if you’re going to finish it!
We are used to thinking of money as a universal measure of value. If a person has a certain amount, we automatically assume they have a certain number of opportunities.
- But is that really the case???

Hello again, it's Nastya with TCP-MARKET
Lately, I can't shake off a rather unpleasant thought.
Not about the rates.
Not about inflation.
Not about 'where the market is going'.
About a simpler thing:
money seem to stop being yours exactly at the moment you try to use it