Venom 拉纳

Silver is in a cooling-off/consolidation phase after its strong January rally. Right now, price is trading below the 50-day moving average ($80.87), which was a key support for most of 2025. As long as silver stays under this level, more downside pressure is possible.

Traders are no longer chasing higher prices. Instead, they are looking for “value” lower down, which increases attention on the 200-day moving average ($51.86) as the next major support zone.
A key date is April 10, when the 50-day moving average is expected to start declining, because the January spike will begin to drop out of the 50-day calculation. This could make the chart reflect the real trend more clearly.
Two outcomes to watch:
Bullish: Silver reclaims the 50-day MA, holds above it, and then needs a catalyst to push higher.
Bearish: Silver continues to reject the 50-day MA and slowly grinds down toward the 200-day MA. Later, a catalyst like lower interest rates could support a fresh rally after the “digesting” phase is complete.
#HarvardAddsETHExposure #Silver $XAG

#Vanar is easy to misread if you judge it the same way you judge every other Layer 1. On the surface, it sits in the familiar bucket: a chain, a token, a roadmap, a promise of scale. But the real question Vanar is trying to answer is not “how fast can we be” or “how cheap can transactions get.” The real question is, can blockchain fit into people’s lives in a way that feels natural.
That sounds simple, but it’s the hardest part of Web3.
Crypto is very good at creating bursts of activity. A campaign launches, volume spikes, timelines get loud, and for a moment it feels like adoption is happening. Then the attention moves on. What’s left is the uncomfortable truth that a lot of activity is not the same as people actually sticking around. Real adoption is quieter. It looks like routine. People come back because they want to, not because they were pulled by a reward or a trend.
If Vanar wants to matter long term, that’s the game it’s playing.
The idea behind Vanar’s strategy makes sense when you think about how normal people discover new technology. Most users don’t enter Web3 because they’re curious about infrastructure. They enter because they like something. A game. A digital world. A creator. A brand they already trust. In that moment, blockchain should not feel like a barrier. It should feel like it isn’t even there. If users have to think about wallets, bridges, and confusing steps every time they interact, the experience stops being fun and starts feeling like work.
Vanar seems to understand that onboarding doesn’t happen through technical explanations. It happens through experiences. That’s why the gaming and digital environment focus matters. Not as a marketing theme, but as a real test of whether the thesis holds up. Can you build places where people show up regularly, interact, own digital items that actually feel useful, and stay engaged over time.
That’s where ecosystem touchpoints like Virtua and VGN become more than names on a list. They are the places where the idea can be proven or disproven. If users don’t stay active there, the story is weak. If they do, the story gets stronger without needing noise.
The same reality check applies to VANRY.
A token can follow two very different paths. One path is where it becomes part of everyday activity. It gets used because the products and the ecosystem naturally require it in meaningful ways. The other path is where it mostly survives on narrative. People talk about it, trade it, post about it, but the real usage stays thin. The difference isn’t the branding. It’s whether the token is actually needed for what people are doing.
If Vanar builds experiences where VANRY becomes a normal part of participation, demand becomes healthier. If VANRY mostly moves with attention cycles, then momentum stays fragile.
There’s also a challenge in Vanar’s bigger ambition. It wants to touch multiple areas: gaming, metaverse, AI-linked products, eco positioning, brand solutions. That can be powerful, but only if those pieces connect in a way users can feel. Breadth without connection becomes distracting. Connection without good usability becomes theory. The strong version of Vanar is one where identity, ownership, and participation flow across products smoothly, without users needing to think too much.
That is why the best way to judge Vanar is not by crypto-native metrics alone. The better questions are human ones. Are people coming back because they enjoy it. Are developers still building after the first push. Are partners expanding because it’s working, not because it looks good in a headline. Is blockchain making the experience better without making it harder.
The next phase of Web3 won’t be won by the loudest claims. It will be won by the projects that make decentralized infrastructure feel normal. Vanar is aiming directly at that problem. If it stays disciplined and keeps product quality ahead of hype, it has a real chance to build something that lasts.
In the end, Vanar doesn’t need to be the chain everyone shouts about for a week. It needs to become the one people keep using without thinking too much about why. That’s the real shift from hype to habit.
@Vanarchain $VANRY

#Fogo 私はFogoについてかなりシンプルな方法で考えていました。「次のファストチェーン」としてではなく、誰もがそう言っているからです。むしろ、明確な道を選び、それを適切に実行しようとしているプロジェクトのようなものです。
FogoはSolanaバーチャルマシンを使用しています。私にとって、その選択は多くを語っています。「このネットワークを試すために、開発者に全く新しい世界を学ばせるつもりはない」と基本的に言っているのです。もし誰かがすでにSolanaスタイルの構築を理解しているなら、彼らはゼロから始めるわけではありません。それは本当の利点であり、盛り上がりの意味ではなく、時間とエネルギーの意味での利点です。

Two major Abu Dhabi investment firms Mubadala Investment Company and Al Warda Investments — increased their holdings in BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) in late 2025. This is important because they bought more even while Bitcoin prices were falling.

In the fourth quarter of 2025, Mubadala raised its IBIT position to 12.7 million shares. Al Warda also increased its position to 8.2 million shares. Together, their total IBIT investment value was over $1 billion at the end of 2025.

After that, Bitcoin fell again in early 2026. Because of this, the value of their combined holdings dropped to a little over $800 million (assuming they did not buy more in 2026). This does not always mean they made a bad decision — it mainly shows short-term market movement. ETF values move with Bitcoin price, so ups and downs are normal.

The bigger point is about institutional behavior. Large funds like these usually invest with a long-term view. They often do not react to every short-term price drop. Instead, they may use weak markets to build positions slowly in regulated products.

IBIT has become one of the most used ways to get Bitcoin exposure through the U.S. financial system. For big institutions, this is easier than buying and storing Bitcoin directly. It offers a familiar structure, better compliance, and strong liquidity.

This news also shows that interest in Bitcoin is no longer only from retail traders. Government-linked and institutional investors are also participating through regulated channels. That can help crypto markets become more mature over time.

Still, this is not a guaranteed bullish signal. Crypto remains highly volatile. Prices can move sharply in either direction, and even ETF investors face full market risk.

In simple words:
These Abu Dhabi funds are treating Bitcoin as a long-term asset class, not just a short-term trade. Even in a falling market, they increased exposure through a regulated ETF route.

Risk note: This article is for information only, not financial advice. Always do your own research and manage risk before investing.
#HarvardAddsETHExposure #BTCFellBelow$69,000Again #bitcoin $BTC

今日はVanarに関して何か違うことを考えていました。

暗号通貨では、通常、速度、手数料、およびパフォーマンスによってチェーンを比較します。しかし、目標が現実世界での採用であるなら、これらのことはもはや最も重要ではないと思います。
もっと重要なのは、誰と一緒に構築しているかかもしれません。
Vanarはゲーム、エンターテイメント企業、ブランドとの仕事の経験があります。それは単なる技術的な詳細ではありません。それは全体の戦略を変えます。ブロックチェーンがすでにユーザーを持つ業界と直接接続されると、採用はゼロから始める必要がありません。

最近Fogoについて読んでいるのですが、正直言って、私の注意を引いたのは「高性能のレイヤー1」というラベルだけではありません。私たちは皆、そのフレーズを何度も見てきました。ほとんどすべての新しいプロジェクトがそれは速いと言っています。

しかし、Fogoを使って、もっと実用的なことを考え始めました。

それはSolanaバーチャルマシン上で動作します。つまり、Solanaが使用しているのと同じ実行システムを使用しています。開発者にとって、それは実際には大きなことです。誰かがすでにSolanaの仕組みを理解していれば、Fogoの上で構築するためにすべてを完全に再学習する必要はありません。それにより、物事が簡単になります。