Tienad

Signore e signori. Posso avere la vostra attenzione, per favore... $MON
Il rapporto sull'acceleratore Monad Nitro è uscito.
- 617 team sono già in fase di sviluppo
- 154 team stanno già generando entrate
- Questi team hanno già raccolto oltre $425M finora
Parte interessante:
I progetti che partecipano a Nitro non provengono da un singolo ecosistema e non sono solo nativi di Monad.
Provengono da più reti blockchain come Solana, Base, Ethereum, nativo di Monad, Arbitrum, Polygon e HyperLiquid.
Catene diverse, costruttori diversi, idee diverse.

🚨 This comparison table just reminded everyone why $HBAR is built different!
Hedera crushes the pack on what actually matters for real adoption - not hype.
Quick breakdown of the metrics 🔥
Max TPS (throttled)
Hedera: 10,000 (infinite potential with sharding)
Solana: 65,000 $SOL
Ethereum: 119
XRP: 1,500
Cardano: 1,000
Time to finality (aBFT where it counts)
Hedera: 3-5s
Solana: 3-40s
Ethereum: 10-15min
XRP: 3-5s
Cardano: 12-24h
Cost per tx (USD)
Hedera: Fixed - predictable fees
Everyone else: Variable (spikes kill usability)
Predictable fees?
Only Hedera: Yes (pegged to $USD)
The rest: No
Energy per tx (kWh) - green king 👑
Hedera: 0.000003 (carbon-negative beast)
Solana: 0.00051
Ethereum: 0.0099
XRP: 0.0079
Cardano: 0.039
ISO 20022 compliant?
Hedera: Yes
XRP: Yes
Cardano: Yes
Solana/Ethereum: No
Hashgraph tech vs plain blockchain - no contest. Mathematically proven aBFT, fair ordering, no MEV nonsense, enterprise council running nodes (Google, IBM vibes). This is why governments & giants pick Hedera for RWAs, stablecoins, supply chains.
While others chase retail speed or memes, HBAR builds the boring-but-unbeatable foundation for the next decade!
Still extremely early. Price hasn't caught the tech yet 😏
What stands out most to you in this table? Drop it below 👇$XAN

$XRP vs $HBAR Confronto fianco a fianco (a partire dal 15 marzo 2026) ⚔️
Attività quotidiana 🔥
• XRP: ~2.7M pagamenti/transazioni al giorno (in forte aumento)
• HBAR: ~1.5M+ transazioni al giorno in media (aziendale + pesante in token, attraverso costantemente elevato)
DeFi / AMM 📈
• XRP: 27,000 pool AMM in esplosione + forte slancio DeFi
• HBAR: scala DeFi più piccola, TVL ~$60M nella principale DEX
RWA / Asset Tokenizzati 💰
• XRP: ~$460M+ valore tokenizzato totale, +35% di aumento recentemente
• HBAR: ~$119M totale, leader nello sviluppo aziendale/RWA (stablecoin del Wyoming attiva, investimenti istituzionali)

Damn, this question actually hit different while I was thinking about the $USDsui launch. $SUI
Everyone’s excited about the new stablecoin, but it made me pause for a second and ask myself something deeper:
Does Sui actually need DeepBook?
What if Sui had skipped it completely and gone full AMM-only like many other chains?
• First, let’s understand what DeepBook really is.
@DeepBookonSui 📘 is basically the central trading layer of the Sui ecosystem.
It isn’t just another DEX competing with others.
It’s a native on-chain central limit order book built directly into the protocol.
That means wallets, trading apps, lending platforms, and new DeFi protocols can all plug into the same shared liquidity layer instead of building separate fragmented markets.
Now here’s why that matters.
Sui’s architecture is insanely fast because of its parallel execution and object-centric design.
For small swaps and normal retail activity, that speed already feels magical.
Transactions happen almost instantly and fees are tiny.
But real financial activity doesn’t stay small forever.
When traders start moving serious size, hedging positions, or using something like $USDsui for larger DeFi operations or payments, pure AMM models start showing their limits.
You begin to see:
> Higher slippage on bigger trades
> Liquidity scattered across multiple apps
> Wider spreads because liquidity is fragmented
And most importantly, market makers stay away.
Without a proper order book, it’s harder for them to quote tight prices or hedge positions efficiently.
This is where DeepBook📘 changes the game.
It creates one shared marketplace for the ecosystem.
Liquidity concentrates in one place.
Limit orders allow proper price discovery.
Market makers can quote tighter spreads.
Suddenly the chain doesn’t just feel fast and it feels financially mature.
Now imagine if DeepBook never existed.
Sui is the fastest chain.
Gas would still be cheap.
But the ecosystem would feel fragmented.
Every protocol would run its own liquidity pools.
One for @CetusProtocol .
Another for @AftermathFi .
Another for new projects launching every month.
Liquidity would scatter everywhere.
Even medium-sized trades could start pushing prices around because the depth simply isn’t shared.
And then think about $USDsui in that world.
The idea behind it is powerful and is a stablecoin designed for payments, DeFi activity, and ecosystem growth, with real yield potentially flowing back into the network.
Not like what $USDT $USDC is doing !
But without deep shared liquidity:
Swapping it would feel inefficient.
Using it in lending protocols would be harder.
Building payment rails on top of it would be slower.
Institutions and larger traders who are starting to explore Sui might hesitate.
Why deal with fragmented liquidity and weaker execution when other ecosystems already have mature trading infrastructure?
A simple way to picture this:
It’s like building the fastest race track in the world…
…but forgetting to add the pit lane, garages, and grandstands.
Cars can still drive fast.
But serious teams, sponsors, and large audiences never fully show up.
That’s what @DeepBookonSui 📘 solves.
It turns Sui’s raw speed into something that can actually support a real financial economy.
And honestly, the timing with $USDsui going live makes this whole design decision make even more sense. $XAN
The pieces are starting to connect. 🚀