Williams, Bostic, Hameck, and Paulson—four officials all came out with hawkish remarks on the same day. They’re all talking about the same thing: inflation, supply shocks, and rate hikes before year-end. In line with that, the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries hit a new high since 2007, while the 30-year yield also climbed to the 2004 record. But this time, the Treasury’s buyback didn’t even fill the full $6 billion cap, and the market doesn’t seem to be buying it as much.
As for the Middle East, it’s still a mix of both sides. The good news is that the U.S. and Iran are reportedly discussing a phased agreement, aiming to reopen the Strait and end the blockade. By Wednesday, the number of cargo ships that actually passed through the Strait jumped to 60, with oil shipments reaching the highest single-day level since July. Of those 40 ships, some are escorted by the U.S. military. But at the same time, Israel has said its next round of strikes against Iran “may only be a matter of time,” and Iranian military advisers have also warned that the conflict could expand to the Indian Ocean.
More unexpectedly, Iran’s president today openly and unusually distanced the country from the Houthi armed group, saying they don’t take orders and should be responsible themselves. He also specifically emphasized that Iran itself hasn’t closed the Strait. Such public statements are uncommon.
What needs to be negotiated is being negotiated, and what needs to be guarded is not being left unguarded.
$BTC Yesterday noon I surged to around 87245 and couldn’t hold on, and the previous high at 87374 stalled there and didn’t break through.
In the evening I directly followed through lower; the low was cut to 83440, and it’s currently consolidating around 84250.
From what I see, the 82000–87000 range should still continue to fluctuate for a while. After this move, it’s likely to keep ranging/going sideways. The support area below is also getting close, but you just need patience and wait.
The above is based on personal observation, not investment advice. Please evaluate the risks yourself.
The “productive” three-hour meeting between the US and Iran yesterday has today been singled out by the Tasnim news agency, which is closely linked to the Revolutionary Guards—saying that Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian’s contacts with US envoys were not approved by the Supreme National Security Council at all, and that his framing was basically “incorrect,” violating national interests, while also demanding he come out to explain himself. Rubio also conceded that the UN talks yesterday in fact made little to no breakthrough.
What we thought was progress yesterday now looks more like a tug-of-war inside Iran between moderates and hardliners—not a real loosening in diplomacy.
Even more intense than that is US Treasuries. The 5-year yield for the first time in 16 years has climbed above 5%. Yields across the curve jumped by 15 basis points across the board. The US dollar index also broke through 101. WTI and Brent both surged, with Brent up 4% at the same time. Gold and silver, however, fell—down 1.6% and 3.9% respectively. The scale of this kind of broad asset co-movement is arguably the biggest this cycle.
At a time like this, Haskett stepped in to call out Fed officials for making too hawkish statements, urging “restoring independence,” and the rhetoric is quite heated.
Trump said U.S. officials held a three-hour meeting with Iran, describing the process as “productive,” and added that there may be an opportunity to reach an agreement after the midterm elections. Iran also confirmed that a meeting will take place, and laid out the conditions directly: lifting the maritime blockade, unfreezing assets, and ending the wars on all fronts. This is the clearest statement of both sides’ positions since this round of conflict.
Qatar’s prime minister sat in alongside, and sources say this meeting wasn’t thrown together on the spur of the moment—it was arranged in advance. Iran denied reports of an alleged “7-day opening of the straits,” but the Revolutionary Guard also softened its stance: “If national interests require it, we’ll talk.” Trump, meanwhile, said he’s willing to meet in New York if the conditions are suitable.
Both sides are leaving room for maneuver in their wording. Compared with earlier rounds of threatening remarks, this is far more pragmatic.
On the other side, Saudi Arabia’s moves are more practical—an east-west pipeline has truly been restarted. Yanbu Port has resumed exports, and Asian refiners have already received informal assurances. Rumors are turning into reality, and this track is worth watching more than Middle East political rhetoric.
$BTC That's outrageous. Bitcoin actually surged past 85,000. Take a look—could it be a fake breakout? If you didn’t get on the train, don’t rush to chase it hard. There will be plenty of opportunities. The bears today got liquidated—6.5 hundred million USD straight
Saudi action is quite clear this time. Please have Oman step in to mediate. The goal is to secure a two-week ceasefire with the Houthis. This is the first time I’ve seen a specific ceasefire timeframe. But on the same day, Iran said it struck an oil tanker flying the flag of Togo. Talking about a ceasefire, yet fighting continues at sea.
There has, however, been progress on the U.S.-Iran front. The U.S. has approved visas for Iran’s president and foreign minister, allowing the delegation to go to New York to attend the UN General Assembly. Trump also confirmed he will attend and will meet with leaders of Gulf countries. After fighting for half a year, this is one of the few concrete diplomatic moves. #MiddleEastSituation #U.S.-IranRelations #Oil
Hey, the salary is way too low. For $500 a month, you’re supposed to help infiltrate U.S. companies—this value-for-money is terrible.
North Korea is recruiting remote IT workers from third countries like Iran and Lebanon. They search for candidates on LinkedIn and have them take on part-time roles as “interview assistants,” paid $500 in cryptocurrency. Once these foreign workers pass the interviews and secure positions, the actual work is then handed over to North Korea.
In July this year, the U.S. government, along with multiple other agencies, issued a warning: in addition to sending salaries back to the parent organization, North Korean IT personnel also pose internal threats, including data theft, cryptocurrency theft, and the leakage of sensitive information.
The data is even more alarming—cryptocurrency losses caused by North Korea-linked hackers in 2025 exceeded **$2 billion**, a 51% year-over-year increase.
A $500 part-time job buys you a security breach across the entire supply chain. 🫡
At the moment, my estimate is to prepare to go long around the 77,000 level.
There’s no need to enter right now. Let the price move into this zone on its own first, then decide the next step based on how it responds once it arrives there.
The reason is simple—at the same support level, different market sentiment can produce completely different price action. If it drops to 77,000 via panic-driven, sharp selling, it usually shows up as a high-volume selloff with long lower wicks or even a direct spike/needle. That’s actually a good signal. But if it grinds down slowly and steadily into that level with bearish candles, it means the selling pressure hasn’t been fully released yet. In that case, the risk of going long is much higher.
So my plan is to take it in two steps:
Step 1: When the price gets near 77,000, first observe whether there are signs of a bottoming out—whether volume expands, whether long lower wicks appear, and whether the market can quickly reclaim lost ground.
Step 2: Only if the reaction looks healthy do I consider entering. If it’s just weak sideways movement or it keeps breaking down, then I’ll continue waiting lower instead of forcing a buy.
77,000 is just the first key level I currently see. After the market reaches it, how it responds matters more than the number itself.
⚠️ The above is my personal trading thought process and not investment advice. Please assess risks on your own and make sure to plan your stop-loss accordingly.
A large fund has received SEC approval, allowing it to tokenize the fund—meaning the fund itself can trade tokenized shares, and even the assets within its investment portfolio can be traded.
If this is true, it suggests the IPO might be moving to the blockchain. Once there is a precedent, all funds will likely rush to issue their own native equity tokens.
Not many people understand this, but the impact will be huge.🫡
$MU Will Micron Taiwan go on strike? Don't rush to call it bad news
Micron Taiwan's union has nearly 10,000 members. Within August, an internal survey found that 80% support a strike. Their demand is a bonus equivalent to 83 months of pay, following the profit-sharing system used by Samsung and Hynix.
The trigger is simple: Micron made a huge profit this year from AI memory, and its stock price has tripled, but employees' profit-sharing amounts to only 2.6 months—far too low compared with competitors.
Is this really bad news? I think it's not that simple.
If there is a strike in the short term, it could actually make the already tight memory supply even tighter. Prices might not fall but instead rise, which may not necessarily be bad for revenue. The real risk is dragging it out—delaying HBM shipments and undermining trust with AI customers.
Also, the script looks familiar—Samsung was almost going on strike in May this year too. In the end, a profit-sharing deal was reached, and things calmed down. Micron will most likely follow the same path and negotiate rather than truly stop production.
As of now, talks are still ongoing, so don't jump to conclusions yet.
⚠️ Personal observations only, not investment advice.