Jana Crypto Queen
291 Posts
Jana Crypto Queen
Square VerifiedReport
Block User
From mining engineer, ended up building my freedom through Web3.
If you’re here, it means you want more than just hype. You want growth, let's get it.
Open Trade
Occasional Trader
4.3 Years
41 Following
3.6K+ Followers
2.6K+ Liked
1 Badges
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
Technically both USDC and USDT can freeze your assets.
What actually makes USDC grow this fast right now is the GENIUS Act, and we need to get more educated about this now.
The new US rules mean banks and institutions can only hold stablecoins with fully qualifying reserves, and USDC fits.
So big money will keep flowing there by default.
Join me and @yikesqq live on Binance Square this week!
Come learn and have fun at the same time.
Technically both USDC and USDT can freeze your assets.
What actually makes USDC grow this fast right now is the GENIUS Act, and we need to get more educated about this now.
The new US rules mean banks and institutions can only hold stablecoins with fully qualifying reserves, and USDC fits.
So big money will keep flowing there by default.
Join me and @yikesqq live on Binance Square this week!
Come learn and have fun at the same time.
What actually makes USDC grow this fast right now is the GENIUS Act, and we need to get more educated about this now.
The new US rules mean banks and institutions can only hold stablecoins with fully qualifying reserves, and USDC fits.
So big money will keep flowing there by default.
Join me and @yikesqq live on Binance Square this week!
Come learn and have fun at the same time.
10
3
11
374
PINNED
Partly True
$HBAR looking really good!
Here's what happened:
- A company building on Hedera got its AI identity tool listed on IBM's cloud catalog.
- Besides Hedera posted that some of its council members, like Accenture, are part of NVIDIA's new AI agent safety platform
My read: Hedera is still down about 42% over the year, so this is a start of a major bounce.
Bullish news and expecting more to come during this cycle for @hedera @HederaCommunity
$HBAR looking really good!
Here's what happened:
- A company building on Hedera got its AI identity tool listed on IBM's cloud catalog.
- Besides Hedera posted that some of its council members, like Accenture, are part of NVIDIA's new AI agent safety platform
My read: Hedera is still down about 42% over the year, so this is a start of a major bounce.
Bullish news and expecting more to come during this cycle for @hedera @HederaCommunity
Here's what happened:
- A company building on Hedera got its AI identity tool listed on IBM's cloud catalog.
- Besides Hedera posted that some of its council members, like Accenture, are part of NVIDIA's new AI agent safety platform
My read: Hedera is still down about 42% over the year, so this is a start of a major bounce.
Bullish news and expecting more to come during this cycle for @hedera @HederaCommunity
4
4
4.3k
SEC saved us?!
Innovation Exemption is a temporary conditional of 5 years that allows on chain trading of US tokenized stocks 🤔
Bullish?
SEC saved us?!
Innovation Exemption is a temporary conditional of 5 years that allows on chain trading of US tokenized stocks 🤔
Bullish?
Innovation Exemption is a temporary conditional of 5 years that allows on chain trading of US tokenized stocks 🤔
Bullish?
1
1
1
860
The CLARITY Act is dead, for now.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
The CLARITY Act is dead, for now.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
3
512
The CLARITY Act is dead, for now.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
The CLARITY Act is dead, for now.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
3
2.9k
I have been looking into @babylonlabs_io after last live on Binance Square and this is what is worth to know now...
How to get my BTC to work for me, BUT not losing what I find the most important part, my keys.
This is what they call self custodial Bitcoin staking.
Staking $BTC without moving anywhere.
How?
You lock it on Bitcoin itself, in a transaction you sign, and that transaction carries the rules for how it can ever be opened again.
There are only three ways it opens.
- The time you picked runs out, and you unlock it with your own key.
- You decide to leave early, and you wait out a short window, around a week, before you can take it.
- The validator you backed gets caught signing two contradicting blocks, and part of your stake gets burned.
That is it. No company sitting there with a master key, because there is no master key to have.
are you staking your BTC or are you happy enouth holding it?
I have been looking into @BabylonLabs_io after last live on Binance Square and this is what is worth to know now...
How to get my BTC to work for me, BUT not losing what I find the most important part, my keys.
This is what they call self custodial Bitcoin staking.
Staking $BTC without moving anywhere.
How?
You lock it on Bitcoin itself, in a transaction you sign, and that transaction carries the rules for how it can ever be opened again.
There are only three ways it opens.
- The time you picked runs out, and you unlock it with your own key.
- You decide to leave early, and you wait out a short window, around a week, before you can take it.
- The validator you backed gets caught signing two contradicting blocks, and part of your stake gets burned.
That is it. No company sitting there with a master key, because there is no master key to have.
are you staking your BTC or are you happy enouth holding it?
How to get my BTC to work for me, BUT not losing what I find the most important part, my keys.
This is what they call self custodial Bitcoin staking.
Staking $BTC without moving anywhere.
How?
You lock it on Bitcoin itself, in a transaction you sign, and that transaction carries the rules for how it can ever be opened again.
There are only three ways it opens.
- The time you picked runs out, and you unlock it with your own key.
- You decide to leave early, and you wait out a short window, around a week, before you can take it.
- The validator you backed gets caught signing two contradicting blocks, and part of your stake gets burned.
That is it. No company sitting there with a master key, because there is no master key to have.
are you staking your BTC or are you happy enouth holding it?
6
376
When you find out you just bought the top 🥹😂
When you find out you just bought the top 🥹😂
3
271
Just finished participating on @babylonlabs_io AMA on Binance Square!
Great solution for those looking to get their BTC to start working for them.
Will share more later...
Just finished participating on @BabylonLabs_io AMA on Binance Square!
Great solution for those looking to get their BTC to start working for them.
Will share more later...
Great solution for those looking to get their BTC to start working for them.
Will share more later...
2
8
657
Just another day in the office…
Who is locked in?
Just another day in the office…
Who is locked in?
Who is locked in?
3
392
Binance, thanks for letting me be part of this.
We are all Binance
Could only be a truly unique place to let us creators feel this important.
Speechless.
#BinanceSwag
Binance, thanks for letting me be part of this.
We are all Binance
Could only be a truly unique place to let us creators feel this important.
Speechless.
#BinanceSwag
We are all Binance
Could only be a truly unique place to let us creators feel this important.
Speechless.
#BinanceSwag
1
3
589
What an Honor to be featured with so many incredible women in crypto.
What an Honor to be featured with so many incredible women in crypto.
Binance Blog
·
--
What does it take to build a career in crypto as a woman?
For this special feature, we spoke with Randi Hipper (Miss Teen Crypto), JanaCryptoQueen, Hadir Gaber, and CryptoMegan about how they entered the industry, the challenges they faced, the moments that almost made them quit, and what crypto changed for them personally.
📅 June 15
⏰ 2:30 PM UTC
Watch the premiere on Binance Square – save the date.
For this special feature, we spoke with Randi Hipper (Miss Teen Crypto), JanaCryptoQueen, Hadir Gaber, and CryptoMegan about how they entered the industry, the challenges they faced, the moments that almost made them quit, and what crypto changed for them personally.
📅 June 15
⏰ 2:30 PM UTC
Watch the premiere on Binance Square – save the date.
2
3
489
SAVE THE DATE!
SAVE THE DATE!
Binance Blog
·
--
What does it take to build a career in crypto as a woman?
For this special feature, we spoke with Randi Hipper (Miss Teen Crypto), JanaCryptoQueen, Hadir Gaber, and CryptoMegan about how they entered the industry, the challenges they faced, the moments that almost made them quit, and what crypto changed for them personally.
📅 June 15
⏰ 2:30 PM UTC
Watch the premiere on Binance Square – save the date.
For this special feature, we spoke with Randi Hipper (Miss Teen Crypto), JanaCryptoQueen, Hadir Gaber, and CryptoMegan about how they entered the industry, the challenges they faced, the moments that almost made them quit, and what crypto changed for them personally.
📅 June 15
⏰ 2:30 PM UTC
Watch the premiere on Binance Square – save the date.
2
362
Verified
Article
Restaking is maturing, and Bedrock 2.0 is what comes nextFor a while, restaking was sold on one thing: The Number.
Not any number, but how much each protocol offers you in APY.
The problem: Majority of this initial restaking mechanics were base on token being generated and price speculation, which isn't the same as actual work being done.
Since 2024, those early restaking numbers have come down across the whole market.
Why? market maturing.
A lot of that early yield was never really yield, it was people farming points and future airdrops, backed up by token emissions. On top of that, far more capital got restaked than there were real services willing to pay for security. When supply floods in faster than genuine demand, the return falls toward what the actual activity can support. The inflated phase was the marketing. What is left is the part that was always real.
This is the context for Bedrock 2.0 and why I think it is worth understanding
Bedrock started life as a restaking protocol.
One pool, one source of yield.
With 2.0 it stops being a single pool and becomes something closer to a real ecosystem.
Your Bitcoin comes in through one liquid token, uniBTC, and that token becomes your key into different markets rather than a receipt that just sits in one strategy pool.
What This Actually Means?
Instead of your Bitcoin earning from a single source, uniBTC can be routed into genuinely different strategies depending on what makes sense in current conditions.
Delta-neutral quant strategies that aim to earn whether BTC goes up or down.
DeFi-native yield.
Lending and credit markets.
Real-world asset vault that brings off-chain instruments on chain, (which is the part I find most interesting as a good fan of RWA)
None of these are invented farm tokens dressed up as returns, and the execution runs with established names: Selini Capital on the market-neutral and trading side, Cap providing the credit infrastructure, and Symbiotic underneath as the shared security layer.
Lastly, there is also BRclaw, an on-chain AI analyst built to help normal people understand the risk and mechanics of each vault.
Again, great tool considering a fast pace AI growth and the use of this evolution to help us doing smart decissions is the way for more adoption of such mechanics.
I am not here to tell you to believe in anything, before you having the proper time to understand what this represents, I've been dedicating time and study as much as possible because this shift isn't only here with Bedrock, but the whole industry is moving i throught.
Finally we're leaving behind products that exist only to chase yield, and moving toward infrastructure built to last and earning trust slowly. A liquid Bitcoin position that can move intelligently across real markets is a lot closer to that future than another pool promising the biggest number.
I'm excited to be trying @Bedrock and looking forward the long term work, what about you?
$BR
Restaking is maturing, and Bedrock 2.0 is what comes next
For a while, restaking was sold on one thing: The Number.
Not any number, but how much each protocol offers you in APY.
The problem: Majority of this initial restaking mechanics were base on token being generated and price speculation, which isn't the same as actual work being done.
Since 2024, those early restaking numbers have come down across the whole market.
Why? market maturing.
A lot of that early yield was never really yield, it was people farming points and future airdrops, backed up by token emissions. On top of that, far more capital got restaked than there were real services willing to pay for security. When supply floods in faster than genuine demand, the return falls toward what the actual activity can support. The inflated phase was the marketing. What is left is the part that was always real.
This is the context for Bedrock 2.0 and why I think it is worth understanding
Bedrock started life as a restaking protocol.
One pool, one source of yield.
With 2.0 it stops being a single pool and becomes something closer to a real ecosystem.
Your Bitcoin comes in through one liquid token, uniBTC, and that token becomes your key into different markets rather than a receipt that just sits in one strategy pool.
What This Actually Means?
Instead of your Bitcoin earning from a single source, uniBTC can be routed into genuinely different strategies depending on what makes sense in current conditions.
Delta-neutral quant strategies that aim to earn whether BTC goes up or down.
DeFi-native yield.
Lending and credit markets.
Real-world asset vault that brings off-chain instruments on chain, (which is the part I find most interesting as a good fan of RWA)
None of these are invented farm tokens dressed up as returns, and the execution runs with established names: Selini Capital on the market-neutral and trading side, Cap providing the credit infrastructure, and Symbiotic underneath as the shared security layer.
Lastly, there is also BRclaw, an on-chain AI analyst built to help normal people understand the risk and mechanics of each vault.
Again, great tool considering a fast pace AI growth and the use of this evolution to help us doing smart decissions is the way for more adoption of such mechanics.
I am not here to tell you to believe in anything, before you having the proper time to understand what this represents, I've been dedicating time and study as much as possible because this shift isn't only here with Bedrock, but the whole industry is moving i throught.
Finally we're leaving behind products that exist only to chase yield, and moving toward infrastructure built to last and earning trust slowly. A liquid Bitcoin position that can move intelligently across real markets is a lot closer to that future than another pool promising the biggest number.
I'm excited to be trying @Bedrock and looking forward the long term work, what about you?
$BR
Not any number, but how much each protocol offers you in APY.
The problem: Majority of this initial restaking mechanics were base on token being generated and price speculation, which isn't the same as actual work being done.
Since 2024, those early restaking numbers have come down across the whole market.
Why? market maturing.
A lot of that early yield was never really yield, it was people farming points and future airdrops, backed up by token emissions. On top of that, far more capital got restaked than there were real services willing to pay for security. When supply floods in faster than genuine demand, the return falls toward what the actual activity can support. The inflated phase was the marketing. What is left is the part that was always real.
This is the context for Bedrock 2.0 and why I think it is worth understanding
Bedrock started life as a restaking protocol.
One pool, one source of yield.
With 2.0 it stops being a single pool and becomes something closer to a real ecosystem.
Your Bitcoin comes in through one liquid token, uniBTC, and that token becomes your key into different markets rather than a receipt that just sits in one strategy pool.
What This Actually Means?
Instead of your Bitcoin earning from a single source, uniBTC can be routed into genuinely different strategies depending on what makes sense in current conditions.
Delta-neutral quant strategies that aim to earn whether BTC goes up or down.
DeFi-native yield.
Lending and credit markets.
Real-world asset vault that brings off-chain instruments on chain, (which is the part I find most interesting as a good fan of RWA)
None of these are invented farm tokens dressed up as returns, and the execution runs with established names: Selini Capital on the market-neutral and trading side, Cap providing the credit infrastructure, and Symbiotic underneath as the shared security layer.
Lastly, there is also BRclaw, an on-chain AI analyst built to help normal people understand the risk and mechanics of each vault.
Again, great tool considering a fast pace AI growth and the use of this evolution to help us doing smart decissions is the way for more adoption of such mechanics.
I am not here to tell you to believe in anything, before you having the proper time to understand what this represents, I've been dedicating time and study as much as possible because this shift isn't only here with Bedrock, but the whole industry is moving i throught.
Finally we're leaving behind products that exist only to chase yield, and moving toward infrastructure built to last and earning trust slowly. A liquid Bitcoin position that can move intelligently across real markets is a lot closer to that future than another pool promising the biggest number.
I'm excited to be trying @Bedrock and looking forward the long term work, what about you?
$BR
6
10
33.3k
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
BitcoinClears$85200
15,195 views
235 Discussing
We got the move, and $BTC is standing exactly where we were before the data. That’s what actual patience for a trade looks like.
The data came in mixed but with some important numbers. ADP Non-Farm Employment Change came at 90K vs 73K forecast, while Core PCE came in at 0.2% vs 0.3% expected. Final GDP was also stronger at 2.2% vs 1.5% forecast, while Personal Spending came in at 0.9% vs 0.8% expected. At the same time, Personal Income missed at 0.2% vs 0.5% forecast.
BTC initially surged to $85,600 and is now back where it needs to be. I’m still looking toward the lower ranges at $82,759 and the $80,000 liquidity, because the overhead liquidity is done and dusted.
We had a live session during the data, and during that session we saw the market at $83,800, then $85,600, and then back toward $83,000 and we still didn’t enter a trade.
That’s what patience is.
We can’t force an entry when the market has no clear direction. The same range is still in focus, and we’ll wait for the market to give us the setup.
Let me know, guys, how was the session? And should we have more regular sessions with our respected members so we can have proper discussions regarding the market?
#BitcoinClears$85200 #AltcoinSeasonIndexHoldsAbove60For5Days #USADPAdds90000JobsInSeptember #BitcoinSlipsBelow$84000 #SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
Crypto_LUX
·26 Likes
·22.1k views
AltcoinSeasonIndexHoldsAbove60For5Days
73,110 views
1,263 Discussing
USADPAdds90000JobsInSeptember
33,167 views
701 Discussing