Hubaliveesar

Not clickbait or speculation I’ve found SOLID proof to back this up.
There’s a trail of facts that keeps lining up, no matter how hard you try to ignore it…
Crypto holders, hear me out.
Here’s who I think Satoshi Nakamoto is:
I’m talking about Hal Finney.

Hal was one of the first people ever to receive Bitcoin.
The first transaction from Satoshi went to him.
That alone already puts him in a microscopic group.
But it goes deeper.
Hal was a world class cryptographer, a cypherpunk OG, and a contributor to PGP years before Bitcoin existed.
He had the exact technical skillset needed to design Bitcoin from scratch, including proof-of-work systems that look way too similar to BTC’s design.
Now here’s where it gets uncomfortable.
Hal lived a few blocks away from a man literally named Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto.
That’s not a conspiracy, that’s literally public record.
If you were trying to pick a pseudonym that wouldn’t draw attention to yourself, what better camouflage than someone down the street?
Writing style analysis is another rabbit hole…
When you compare Hal’s emails, forum posts, and code comments to Satoshi’s writings, the overlap in tone, structure, and phrasing is hard to unsee. Same dry humor.
Same clarity and same discipline.
Timing matters too…
Satoshi vanished from the internet right around the time Hal’s ALS symptoms worsened.
As Hal’s health declined, Satoshi went silent forever.
No dramatic exit. No goodbye post. He’s just… gone.
And maybe the most telling detail of all:
Hal mined early Bitcoin, and alot of it.
But those coins were never moved. Ever.
No cash-out, no temptation, no exit scam.
Exactly what you’d expect from someone who didn’t build Bitcoin for money.
Today, he would be worth a staggering $100 billion dollars.
Hal once said he believed Bitcoin could become a global reserve asset.
Satoshi designed it that way.
Was Hal definitely Satoshi? Nobody can 100% prove it.
But if Satoshi was a single person, and not a group, Hal Finney checks more boxes than anyone else.
And maybe that’s the point.
Bitcoin didn’t need a CEO, it just needed an idea.
And the person behind it made sure the idea outlived them.
Btw, I’ve called every major top and bottom for the last decade.
I was one of the only people who called the top in October, and I’ll do it again, that’s literally my job. Pay close attention.
If you still haven’t followed me, you’ll regret it.
$BTC
#satoshiNakamato #BinanceSquare #BinanceBiBi #Follow4more

That’s the surface story.
It's about China & I'll prove it!
Look, here’s the deeper question most never ask:
What does Iraq have in common with China today?
And no — it’s not what the media keeps repeating.
It’s not just oil.
It’s who controls the system around the oil.
Back in the early 2000s, Iraq wasn’t just selling oil.
Iraq was threatening to change how oil was priced and settled.
They began moving away from the dollar system.
That’s when Iraq stopped being “a problem nation”
and started becoming a systemic threat.
Fast forward to today.
China doesn’t need to invade countries to control oil.
China controls oil through:
- Long-term purchase agreements
- Oil-for-debt structures
- Shadow shipping networks
- Non-dollar settlement routes
Iran and Venezuela became perfect examples.
✅Iran sends roughly 1.4–1.6 million barrels per day, and the vast majority flows to China through discounted, off-the-books routes.
✅Venezuela exports around 700,000–900,000 barrels per day, with China acting as the primary destination and financier through debt-backed supply deals.
That’s not just energy.
That’s geopolitical leverage.
China wasn’t just buying oil.
China was controlling the exit door after United States put sanctions on them.
So what’s happening now?
The U.S. isn’t “starting wars.”
IT'S BREAKING CONTROL CHAINS.
Step by step.
First, sanctions didn’t target countries — they targeted:
- Shipping companies
- Insurance
- Ports
- Refiners
- Payment rails
That’s not military strategy.
That’s financial warfare.
Then came blockades, seizures, and pressure at sea — the one place where oil can’t hide.
And finally, political shock.
Because once you break:
- Who ships the oil
- Who insures it
- Who settles the payments
You don’t need to “own” the oil fields.
You own the system that decides who gets paid.
This is the same lesson Iraq taught years ago.
It was never just about oil in the ground.
It was about:
- Currency dominance
- Trade settlement power
- Control over global cashflow
Oil is just the bloodstream.
The real fight is over who controls the heart.
That’s why Iran matters.
That’s why Venezuela matters.
And that’s why China is in the middle of this — whether the headlines say so or not.
The rich don’t argue politics.
They study systems.
Because when systems shift, fortunes shift with them.
By Robert Kiyosaki, 04.01.2025
#americavschina #Follow4more