Entry: 0.0074450 Now: 0.0091333 Final Destination: 0.00940
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ LIVE UPDATE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Posted this setup earlier when it was at +458%. Demand zone entry, New York session timing, zone was clear.
Price didn't stop there.
From 0.00745 to 0.00913 in one move. No chop, no fake-out, straight into the target. The zone held exactly where it was supposed to, the session delivered, and the trade ran itself.
Final destination is 0.00940. Almost there. I'm not closing early.
When the zone is right and the session is right, you sit on your hands and let it play out. That's the whole discipline.
Will post the final update when it closes.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Debate:
At +900% on a live trade, do you close early or hold to the target? Where does discipline end and greed begin?
$LSK LSKUSDT Long Closed Price broke through 0.44 and pushed toward the highs. I took profits along the way and trailed my stop to entry once the trade confirmed. Price reversed from that zone before reaching the 0.50 to 0.53 target. The rest of the position closed at breakeven. Full target not hit, but the trade paid well before the reversal. The 0.44 to 0.45 zone acted as resistance exactly where it needed to. Next time, I'll watch that zone closer as a scale-out point rather than something to push through.
hellobinyak
·
--
Bullish
$LSK
LSKUSDT Long Update I entered at 0.39243 on the pullback into the 1h imbalance (FVG). Price now trades at 0.4144. I moved my stop loss to 0.36500, below the pullback low. • Entry: 0.39240 • Stop loss: 0.36500 • Target: 0.50 to 0.53 supply zone • Reward: 1:4 Why I took this trade: • Demand: Price left the 0.30 to 0.34 demand zone with strong, impulsive candles. Buyers overpowered sellers and left imbalance behind. • Retest: Price pulled back into the 1h imbalance (FVG) near 0.39, where unfilled buy orders sat. Buyers stepped in again. • Structure: Higher lows and repeated breaks of structure show demand in control. • Supply: The 0.50 to 0.53 zone is untouched. Sell orders still wait there. The 0.449 swing high is the first test, then the 0.46 supply zone. If price breaks 0.449, the path to 0.50 gets cleaner. If price rejects with force, I reassess. The trade is live. I will update again at 0.449. $LSK 😀
LSKUSDT Long Update I entered at 0.39243 on the pullback into the 1h imbalance (FVG). Price now trades at 0.4144. I moved my stop loss to 0.36500, below the pullback low. • Entry: 0.39240 • Stop loss: 0.36500 • Target: 0.50 to 0.53 supply zone • Reward: 1:4 Why I took this trade: • Demand: Price left the 0.30 to 0.34 demand zone with strong, impulsive candles. Buyers overpowered sellers and left imbalance behind. • Retest: Price pulled back into the 1h imbalance (FVG) near 0.39, where unfilled buy orders sat. Buyers stepped in again. • Structure: Higher lows and repeated breaks of structure show demand in control. • Supply: The 0.50 to 0.53 zone is untouched. Sell orders still wait there. The 0.449 swing high is the first test, then the 0.46 supply zone. If price breaks 0.449, the path to 0.50 gets cleaner. If price rejects with force, I reassess. The trade is live. I will update again at 0.449. $LSK 😀
$LSK LSKUSDT Long Update I entered at 0.39243 on the pullback into the 1h imbalance (FVG). Price now trades at 0.4144. I moved my stop loss to 0.36500, below the pullback low. • Entry: 0.39240 • Stop loss: 0.36500 • Target: 0.50 to 0.53 supply zone • Reward: 1:4 Why I took this trade: • Demand: Price left the 0.30 to 0.34 demand zone with strong, impulsive candles. Buyers overpowered sellers and left imbalance behind. • Retest: Price pulled back into the 1h imbalance (FVG) near 0.39, where unfilled buy orders sat. Buyers stepped in again. • Structure: Higher lows and repeated breaks of structure show demand in control. • Supply: The 0.50 to 0.53 zone is untouched. Sell orders still wait there. The 0.449 swing high is the first test, then the 0.46 supply zone. If price breaks 0.449, the path to 0.50 gets cleaner. If price rejects with force, I reassess. The trade is live. I will update again at 0.449. $LSK 😀
Entered long at 0.2568 off the 15m demand zone, targeting the daily supply block near 0.31-0.325. Price pushed straight into the weak high at 0.2653 and got rejected fast. That level held on the first test, which is normal, not a failure. Weak highs often take more than one attempt before they break. Currently consolidating between 0.2519 and 0.2576, building out a fresh 15m FVG. This range is the real tell right now. Holding above 0.2519 keeps the bullish structure from the earlier CHoCH intact. A clean break below it and the setup toward supply is off the table, regardless of where the hard stop sits. SL adjusted from 0.2483 to 0.2519, tightening risk to match actual structure instead of giving the trade room to bleed into lower support that has nothing to do with this thesis. Next decision point: reclaim and hold above 0.2576, or lose 0.2519. One confirms continuation, the other invalidates it. Not financial advice, just tracking the trade.
$WIF Entered long at 0.2568 off the 15m demand zone, targeting the daily supply block near 0.31-0.325. Price pushed straight into the weak high at 0.2653 and got rejected fast. That level held on the first test, which is normal, not a failure. Weak highs often take more than one attempt before they break. Currently consolidating between 0.2519 and 0.2576, building out a fresh 15m FVG. This range is the real tell right now. Holding above 0.2519 keeps the bullish structure from the earlier CHoCH intact. A clean break below it and the setup toward supply is off the table, regardless of where the hard stop sits. SL adjusted from 0.2483 to 0.2519, tightening risk to match actual structure instead of giving the trade room to bleed into lower support that has nothing to do with this thesis. Next decision point: reclaim and hold above 0.2576, or lose 0.2519. One confirms continuation, the other invalidates it. Not financial advice, just tracking the trade.
Entry: 0.0074450 Now: 0.0091333 Final Destination: 0.00940
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ LIVE UPDATE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Posted this setup earlier when it was at +458%. Demand zone entry, New York session timing, zone was clear.
Price didn't stop there.
From 0.00745 to 0.00913 in one move. No chop, no fake-out, straight into the target. The zone held exactly where it was supposed to, the session delivered, and the trade ran itself.
Final destination is 0.00940. Almost there. I'm not closing early.
When the zone is right and the session is right, you sit on your hands and let it play out. That's the whole discipline.
Will post the final update when it closes.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Debate:
At +900% on a live trade, do you close early or hold to the target? Where does discipline end and greed begin?
When $NEIRO started pushing toward 0.00011, I wasn't thinking breakout. I was thinking — this is where sellers were last time. The supply zone at 0.00010624–0.00011025 was already on my chart before price arrived there.
The rejection told me everything. Price tapped the zone, couldn't hold above it, and started printing lower highs immediately. Each bounce attempt was weaker than the one before. That descending structure inside the zone was my confirmation — sellers were absorbing every buy.
I didn't short the pump. I shorted the failure to continue it.
Targets were the demand zones sitting below — 0.00009704, 0.00009065, and 0.00008348. Each one a level where buyers had previously shown up. Natural resting points for the sell pressure to pause. Price hit all three.
SL was above the supply zone ceiling at 0.00011582. If price closed above that, the zone was broken and I was wrong. It never did.
Now price is sitting at the bottom demand zone at 0.00008348–0.00009065. Same logic applies in reverse. I'm watching this level for the next move.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ WHAT I'M SEEING ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This zone at 0.29–0.39 is where $RAVE built its base before the original move up. Price left this level fast back then — and now after an 80% pullback, it's returned to the same area.
The bounce off 0.20 caught my attention. Not because of how far it moved — because of how fast it moved. That kind of reaction from a known level isn't random. It tells me there's interest here.
But I haven't entered yet. I want one clean 4H candle closing inside the zone with buyers clearly in control before I commit. Until that forms, this stays on my watchlist.
If confirmation comes — entry is 0.29–0.39, SL below 0.28, and I'm targeting 0.55, 0.74, and 0.935 in that order. Each of those targets is a level where price previously stalled on the way down. Natural ceilings.
If price closes below 0.28 on the 4H before I get confirmation — the zone is broken and I move on. No trade.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ WHAT I'M SEEING ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This zone at 0.29–0.39 is where $RAVE built its base before the original move up. Price left this level fast back then — and now after an 80% pullback, it's returned to the same area.
The bounce off 0.20 caught my attention. Not because of how far it moved — because of how fast it moved. That kind of reaction from a known level isn't random. It tells me there's interest here.
But I haven't entered yet. I want one clean 4H candle closing inside the zone with buyers clearly in control before I commit. Until that forms, this stays on my watchlist.
If confirmation comes — entry is 0.29–0.39, SL below 0.28, and I'm targeting 0.55, 0.74, and 0.935 in that order. Each of those targets is a level where price previously stalled on the way down. Natural ceilings.
If price closes below 0.28 on the 4H before I get confirmation — the zone is broken and I move on. No trade.
$VELVET update — the long is done. Now I'm watching the other side.
In my last post I mentioned the supply zone at 1.65–1.85 as the next level to watch after the 4x move from demand. Price is there now. And I'm not touching a long until I see how this plays out.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔍 WHAT I'M SEEING RIGHT NOW ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
The same logic that made me buy at 0.40 is now making me cautious at 1.65.
This supply zone is where price previously topped out and reversed hard. It's not a line I drew hoping for resistance — it's the origin of the last major sell-off. Sellers who were active here before still have orders sitting in this range. When price returns, those orders get triggered again.
What I'm not doing is shorting the approach. I made that mistake clear in earlier posts — entering before confirmation is predicting, not reacting. Right now price is inside the zone but hasn't shown me a clear rejection. I need a 4H candle that closes back below the zone entry with conviction. That's my trigger.
Until that candle forms, I'm watching. Not trading.
If price pushes through 1.90 and closes above it cleanly, the supply zone is broken. In that case, the next major supply is around 2.20–2.40 and I'll reassess from there. I won't fight a breakout.
Two scenarios. One plan for each. No guessing required.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This is what Supply & Demand trading actually looks like in real time — not a signal, not a prediction. Just a zone, a trigger I'm waiting for, and two outcomes I'm already prepared for.
I'll update this post when the confirmation candle forms — or when it doesn't.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📖 HOW I READ THIS MARKET ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
When VELVET crashed from 1.85 all the way back to 0.40, most people saw a broken chart. I saw a return to origin.
That 0.40–0.55 range was not random. It was the exact base from which VELVET launched its first major move — from near zero all the way to 1.85. That kind of move doesn't happen without institutional involvement, and institutions don't fill their entire position in one candle. They leave resting orders at levels they consider undervalued. When price came back to 0.40, those orders were still there.
The crash into the zone actually made me more confident, not less. A fast, aggressive drop into a demand area is a liquidity sweep — price hunts the stops of early buyers, collects the liquidity, then reverses. That's exactly what happened. Price wicked briefly below 0.40, swept the lows, then started basing.
For almost two weeks, VELVET did nothing. Chopped between 0.40 and 0.55 while everyone called it dead. That sideways action wasn't weakness — it was accumulation. The longer price holds inside a demand zone without breaking it, the more orders are being absorbed quietly.
Then on June 25, the structure shifted. Price broke above 0.55 with momentum, pulled back once to confirm it as support, and launched. From 0.40 to 1.83 in three days.
I wasn't lucky. I was early, patient, and had a plan that I didn't deviate from while the chart looked ugly.
The supply zone now sits at 1.65–1.85. That's the next level I'm watching for distribution. Price has already tapped it and pulled back to 1.59. The same logic that told me to buy at 0.40 is now telling me to be cautious above 1.65. $VELVET
$VELVET are you guys still holding? Going as planned
hellobinyak
·
--
Bullish
$VELVET /USDT has been quietly ranging inside a Higher Timeframe Demand Zone for nearly a week — and ranges like this usually end with a decision, not a slow fade.
$VELVET – WATCHING FOR LONG
Trade Plan (conditional):
Range: 0.40 – 0.55 Trigger for long: 4H close above 0.55 with rising volume Entry on trigger: 0.55 – 0.60 SL: below range low, 0.388 TP1: 0.788 TP2: 1.060 TP3: 1.300
Alternative scenario (if range breaks down): Below 0.40 with a 4H close = zone failure, no long until price finds a new base.
What's happening here?
• This 0.40–0.55 zone is the origin of VELVET's previous 4x move (from ~0.40 to 1.85). Price has fully retraced back into it.
• Unlike a fresh first-touch bounce, price has been chopping sideways inside this zone for almost a week. That's not a clean reaction — it's either accumulation (smart money building a position quietly) or distribution (the zone slowly getting absorbed before a breakdown).
• A range that's held for days needs a trigger, not a guess. The plan above is conditional — no entry until price proves direction with a close outside the range.
• This is the difference between predicting and reacting. Predicting a bounce off a week-old range is a coin flip. Reacting to a confirmed breakout or breakdown puts the odds back in your favor.
Why post this now instead of waiting?
Because the range itself is the information. Knowing where the decision point is — and having a plan for both outcomes — is more valuable than guessing which way it breaks.
Debate:
VELVET has been ranging in this zone for almost a week. Accumulation before the next leg up, or slow distribution before a breakdown? What's your read?