Crypto_Weilong
17k Posts
Crypto_Weilong
Square Verified+Wei Long伟龙
Open Trade
SOL Holder
High-Frequency Trader
1.9 Years
109 Following
43.5K+ Followers
22.1K+ Liked
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Live
PINNED
Partly True
$BABY #baby
Just finished reading the latest thread from @BabylonLabs_io and one part caught me off guard.
The headline could've been David Tse's background. Inventing proportional-fair scheduling, the algorithm that helped shape 3G, 4G and 5G networks, is already a remarkable story.
But that isn't what stayed with me.
The more interesting detail is the question that came after it.
"How do we make Bitcoin productive without breaking its trust model?"
That feels like a very different starting point from most Bitcoin infrastructure projects.
Instead of beginning with yield, borrowing, or new financial products, the question starts with a constraint.
The trust model comes first.
Everything else has to fit inside it.
Looking at Babylon through that lens makes a lot of its design choices feel less like features and more like consequences of that original research question.
Makes me wonder how many of the protocol's future decisions will still be guided by that same constraint, even as the ecosystem keeps expanding.
Just finished reading the latest thread from @BabylonLabs_io and one part caught me off guard.
The headline could've been David Tse's background. Inventing proportional-fair scheduling, the algorithm that helped shape 3G, 4G and 5G networks, is already a remarkable story.
But that isn't what stayed with me.
The more interesting detail is the question that came after it.
"How do we make Bitcoin productive without breaking its trust model?"
That feels like a very different starting point from most Bitcoin infrastructure projects.
Instead of beginning with yield, borrowing, or new financial products, the question starts with a constraint.
The trust model comes first.
Everything else has to fit inside it.
Looking at Babylon through that lens makes a lot of its design choices feel less like features and more like consequences of that original research question.
Makes me wonder how many of the protocol's future decisions will still be guided by that same constraint, even as the ecosystem keeps expanding.
$ESPORTS
Entry: 0.0432–0.0438
Stop Loss: 0.0414
TP1: 0.0468
TP2: 0.0495
TP3: 0.0520
$RIF $RE
Entry: 0.0432–0.0438
Stop Loss: 0.0414
TP1: 0.0468
TP2: 0.0495
TP3: 0.0520
$RIF $RE
$RIF LONG only if a 1H candle closes above 0.1200.
Entry: 0.1205
SL: 0.1140
TP1: 0.1280
TP2: 0.1350
❌ If there is no breakout above 0.1200, do not trade.
Final Decision: NO TRADE. Wait patiently for confirmation.$ESPORTS $RE
Entry: 0.1205
SL: 0.1140
TP1: 0.1280
TP2: 0.1350
❌ If there is no breakout above 0.1200, do not trade.
Final Decision: NO TRADE. Wait patiently for confirmation.$ESPORTS $RE
$797B Wiped Out: Is the AI Boom Finally Facing Reality?
The "Magnificent Seven" lost nearly $797 billion in market value in a single trading session, marking their biggest decline since April 2025.
The trigger wasn't that AI is dead. It was growing concern over how much money companies are spending on AI without clear returns.
Key facts:
• Alphabet increased its 2026 capital spending guidance to around $205 billion.
• Tesla warned that 2026 will require another year of heavy investment despite weaker-than-expected earnings.
• The Nasdaq 100 fell 1.9%, while the S&P 500 dropped 1.2%.
This doesn't mean AI has failed. It shows that investors are becoming more selective. Markets now want profits and measurable ROI, not just massive AI spending.
For crypto investors, this matters because weakness in major tech stocks often affects overall market sentiment, including Bitcoin and other digital assets.
My view: AI remains a long-term trend, but the market is shifting from rewarding AI narratives to rewarding real financial results. The next phase may favor companies that can prove AI investments are generating sustainable returns.
The "Magnificent Seven" lost nearly $797 billion in market value in a single trading session, marking their biggest decline since April 2025.
The trigger wasn't that AI is dead. It was growing concern over how much money companies are spending on AI without clear returns.
Key facts:
• Alphabet increased its 2026 capital spending guidance to around $205 billion.
• Tesla warned that 2026 will require another year of heavy investment despite weaker-than-expected earnings.
• The Nasdaq 100 fell 1.9%, while the S&P 500 dropped 1.2%.
This doesn't mean AI has failed. It shows that investors are becoming more selective. Markets now want profits and measurable ROI, not just massive AI spending.
For crypto investors, this matters because weakness in major tech stocks often affects overall market sentiment, including Bitcoin and other digital assets.
My view: AI remains a long-term trend, but the market is shifting from rewarding AI narratives to rewarding real financial results. The next phase may favor companies that can prove AI investments are generating sustainable returns.
Tesla reporting a $112 million Bitcoin impairment without selling a single coin tells an interesting story.
On paper, the loss looks significant. But in reality, it reflects accounting rules rather than a change in Tesla's conviction. The company continued to hold its entire Bitcoin position throughout Q2 2026 instead of reacting to short-term market volatility.
That decision sends a clear message. Tesla appears willing to ride through price swings rather than treat Bitcoin as a short-term trade. While market values may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, the company’s strategy remained unchanged.
Sometimes, what a company doesn't do is just as important as what it does. Holding steady during a difficult quarter speaks louder than the impairment figure itself.
#ECBHoldsRatesAt2.25% #SKHynixADRConversionCapFullyUsed #TeslaBitcoinHoldings
On paper, the loss looks significant. But in reality, it reflects accounting rules rather than a change in Tesla's conviction. The company continued to hold its entire Bitcoin position throughout Q2 2026 instead of reacting to short-term market volatility.
That decision sends a clear message. Tesla appears willing to ride through price swings rather than treat Bitcoin as a short-term trade. While market values may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, the company’s strategy remained unchanged.
Sometimes, what a company doesn't do is just as important as what it does. Holding steady during a difficult quarter speaks louder than the impairment figure itself.
#ECBHoldsRatesAt2.25% #SKHynixADRConversionCapFullyUsed #TeslaBitcoinHoldings
Spent a bit of time reading @BabylonLabs_io latest partnership update with @KeystoneWallet and one detail kept pulling me back.
On the surface, it's pretty straightforward. Babylon users will be able to choose Keystone as a Bitcoin wallet for native BTC-backed borrowing through Aave v4 using Trustless Bitcoin Vaults.
But the wallet choice feels more important than it first appears.
Keystone has built its reputation around one idea: your private keys never leave your control. Air-gapped signing. Open-source firmware. Every transaction verified before it's approved.
That's almost the same trust model Babylon has been pushing with native Bitcoin-backed borrowing.
Instead of asking users to compromise on self-custody for access to liquidity, both sides seem to be moving in the opposite direction.
It makes the partnership feel less like adding another supported wallet and more like reinforcing the assumptions the product is built on.
Still curious about the "more information in the coming months" line.
If this ends up being deeper than wallet compatibility, it could say a lot about where Bitcoin-backed DeFi infrastructure is heading next.#baby $BABY
On the surface, it's pretty straightforward. Babylon users will be able to choose Keystone as a Bitcoin wallet for native BTC-backed borrowing through Aave v4 using Trustless Bitcoin Vaults.
But the wallet choice feels more important than it first appears.
Keystone has built its reputation around one idea: your private keys never leave your control. Air-gapped signing. Open-source firmware. Every transaction verified before it's approved.
That's almost the same trust model Babylon has been pushing with native Bitcoin-backed borrowing.
Instead of asking users to compromise on self-custody for access to liquidity, both sides seem to be moving in the opposite direction.
It makes the partnership feel less like adding another supported wallet and more like reinforcing the assumptions the product is built on.
Still curious about the "more information in the coming months" line.
If this ends up being deeper than wallet compatibility, it could say a lot about where Bitcoin-backed DeFi infrastructure is heading next.#baby $BABY
$CLO
Entry: 0.1295 – 0.1305
Stop Loss: 0.1228
TP1: 0.1360
TP2: 0.1450
TP3: 0.1580
$RIF $BANK
Entry: 0.1295 – 0.1305
Stop Loss: 0.1228
TP1: 0.1360
TP2: 0.1450
TP3: 0.1580
$RIF $BANK
$AKE
Entry: 0.00195 – 0.00199
Stop Loss: 0.00184
TP1: 0.00208
TP2: 0.00222
TP3: 0.00240
$ON $BANK
Entry: 0.00195 – 0.00199
Stop Loss: 0.00184
TP1: 0.00208
TP2: 0.00222
TP3: 0.00240
$ON $BANK
📈 $IDOL – LONG
📌 Entry: 0.0180 – 0.0183
🛑 SL: 0.0172
🎯 TP1: 0.0192
🎯 TP2: 0.0205
🎯 TP3: 0.0220
Caption:
IDOL was silent all day...
Then woke up and chose main character energy. 🎬😂
Now the candles are saying:
"If you blinked... you bought higher." 📈🔥🚀$RIF $ON
📌 Entry: 0.0180 – 0.0183
🛑 SL: 0.0172
🎯 TP1: 0.0192
🎯 TP2: 0.0205
🎯 TP3: 0.0220
Caption:
IDOL was silent all day...
Then woke up and chose main character energy. 🎬😂
Now the candles are saying:
"If you blinked... you bought higher." 📈🔥🚀$RIF $ON
✅ Trade: LONG
Coin: $DODOX
Entry: 0.0203 – 0.0206
Stop Loss: 0.0192
TP1: 0.0219
TP2: 0.0238
TP3: 0.0260
$ON $ZAMA
Coin: $DODOX
Entry: 0.0203 – 0.0206
Stop Loss: 0.0192
TP1: 0.0219
TP2: 0.0238
TP3: 0.0260
$ON $ZAMA
$ERA
Entry: 0.1040 – 0.1070
🛑 SL: 0.0980
🎯 TP1: 0.1150
🎯 TP2: 0.1230
🎯 TP3: 0.1360
$BANK $ON
Entry: 0.1040 – 0.1070
🛑 SL: 0.0980
🎯 TP1: 0.1150
🎯 TP2: 0.1230
🎯 TP3: 0.1360
$BANK $ON
$AIA
Entry: 0.0640 – 0.0650
🛑 SL: 0.0618
🎯 TP1: 0.0695
🎯 TP2: 0.0730
🎯 TP3: 0.0780
$ON $BANK
Entry: 0.0640 – 0.0650
🛑 SL: 0.0618
🎯 TP1: 0.0695
🎯 TP2: 0.0730
🎯 TP3: 0.0780
$ON $BANK
$RIF
Entry: 0.0770 – 0.0800
🛑 SL: 0.0710
🎯 TP1: 0.0890
🎯 TP2: 0.0970
🎯 TP3: 0.1080
$BANK $ON
Entry: 0.0770 – 0.0800
🛑 SL: 0.0710
🎯 TP1: 0.0890
🎯 TP2: 0.0970
🎯 TP3: 0.1080
$BANK $ON
$PHAROS big entry
Entry: 0.3920 – 0.3980
🛑 SL: 0.3820
🎯 TP1: 0.4200
🎯 TP2: 0.4400
🎯 TP3: 0.4700
Entry: 0.3920 – 0.3980
🛑 SL: 0.3820
🎯 TP1: 0.4200
🎯 TP2: 0.4400
🎯 TP3: 0.4700
$ZAMA Pullback Long (Preferred)
📌 Entry: 0.0475 – 0.0485
🛑 SL: 0.0450
🎯 TP1: 0.0520
🎯 TP2: 0.0550
🎯 TP3: 0.0580
📌 Entry: 0.0475 – 0.0485
🛑 SL: 0.0450
🎯 TP1: 0.0520
🎯 TP2: 0.0550
🎯 TP3: 0.0580
$ON – SHORT 📉
Entry: 0.1620 – 0.1660
SL: 0.1735
🎯 TP1: 0.1500
🎯 TP2: 0.1380
🎯 TP3: 0.1220
The recovery rally has pushed price back into a strong supply zone after a sharp rejection from 0.1846. On both the 4H and 1H charts, buyers are losing momentum as price approaches key resistance levels.
A rejection from the current zone could trigger profit-taking and a corrective move toward lower support areas. Unless bulls reclaim and hold above the stop-loss region, the risk favors downside continuation.
Trade #ON here 👇$ZAMA $BANK
Entry: 0.1620 – 0.1660
SL: 0.1735
🎯 TP1: 0.1500
🎯 TP2: 0.1380
🎯 TP3: 0.1220
The recovery rally has pushed price back into a strong supply zone after a sharp rejection from 0.1846. On both the 4H and 1H charts, buyers are losing momentum as price approaches key resistance levels.
A rejection from the current zone could trigger profit-taking and a corrective move toward lower support areas. Unless bulls reclaim and hold above the stop-loss region, the risk favors downside continuation.
Trade #ON here 👇$ZAMA $BANK
$MIRA Breakout Long
Entry: 0.0535 (only after a 1H candle closes above 0.0532)
SL: 0.0505
TP1: 0.0565
TP2: 0.0600
TP3: 0.0640
$RE $LAB
Entry: 0.0535 (only after a 1H candle closes above 0.0532)
SL: 0.0505
TP1: 0.0565
TP2: 0.0600
TP3: 0.0640
$RE $LAB
Log in to explore more content