After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
If you could go back to the first day of trading, what would you most want to tell yourself?
My answer:
“First learn position/risk management, then learn technical analysis.”
Most people do it in the wrong order—learn candlesticks, indicators, and patterns first. You may be able to identify the direction correctly, but you still end up losing money.
That’s because you haven’t done proper risk management.
Even if you only have a 60% win rate, and pair it with a 2R risk/reward ratio, long-term you’ll still have a positive expected value.
Tell me about the trading mistake that left the deepest impression on me.
That was when I was just starting to build quantitative trading systems.
The system generated a short signal. I looked at it and thought, “The direction is wrong,” so I didn’t execute.
As it turned out, if I had executed that trade, the profit factor would have been 4R.
Even worse, later on I “made my own judgment” and went long—then I stopped out.
That day made me realize something: I design the system because I don’t trust my intuition. If I don’t trust the system, what’s the point of having it?
From that day on, I stopped “overriding” the system signals.
When building my first quant trading system, I stepped into three pitfalls.
Pitfall 1: Overfitting The backtest looked ridiculously good, but once I went live, it fell apart. Reason: I tuned the parameters too closely to historical data.
Pitfall 2: Ignoring trading fees In the backtest, I made $50 per trade—but in live trading, after fees, I only ended up with $15. That means returns were slashed by 70%.
Pitfall 3: No stop-loss logic “Quant systems won’t do anything reckless.” Until one time the market moved and wiped out 20% in a single wave—I realized quant trading can still blow up.
The SYS series was built slowly only after stepping into these three pitfalls. Without pitfalls, there’s no system.
Resistance: in the upper 1–2% range (with prior dense trading) Support: around the lower 1.5% (rising trendline)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks through resistance with increased volume → direction confirmed; you can follow. If price rises on low volume → wait for a pullback to reassess.
Even days with no trades are a form of trading decision.
Market Weekly Report | What is BTC telling us this week?
Overall, this week BTC is showing a high-level consolidation pattern.
Trading volume gradually shrank, indicating that both bulls and bears are waiting.
Usually, there are two ways this pattern ends: 1. Trading volume suddenly expands → a direction is chosen 2. Continue ranging sideways until an external catalyst appears
My current view: before the direction becomes clear, keep watching.
Confirming later is the most labor-saving approach.
Someone said, “I’m always getting liquidated, or on the way to getting liquidated. I just want to learn from you.”
Those words made me think for a long time.
Because I’ve walked that road too. That feeling of resetting to zero again and again, and telling yourself, “Next time for sure,”—I understand it all too well.
But his line—“I’m not that greedy. I just want to learn”— In a market full of leverage dreams, someone who can say that has already won half the battle, mentally.
The ones who truly manage to survive in the market were never the smartest or the boldest gambler.
It’s the one who stays low-key, and is most willing to admit when they’re wrong.
If you’re also on the road, leave a comment and tell me which stage you’re stuck at.
Why do I trust quantitative trading systems instead of “feelings”?
Because feelings can deceive you, but data won’t.
Looking back at my trading records from the past five years: · Two years of trading based on feelings: huge account fluctuations, and my mood was all over the place · Three years after becoming systematic: much more stable—even when there were losses, they were within expectations
Quant trading isn’t a cure-all, but it does one very important thing: It prevents “emotions” from interfering with decisions.
Signals come in, then act; if no signals come in, then wait. That’s it.
Market Weekly Review | What Is BTC Telling Us This Week?
Overall, this week BTC showed a high-level consolidation pattern.
Trading volume gradually decreased, indicating that both the bulls and bears are waiting.
Typically, there are two ways this kind of pattern ends: 1. Volume suddenly expands → direction is chosen 2. Continue ranging until an external catalyst appears
My current view: keep observing until the direction becomes clear.
Once confirmed, it’s the most effortless approach.
A lazy guide to how changes in Federal Reserve policy affect the crypto market.
Rate cuts → US dollar weakens → risk assets rise → crypto market benefits Rate hikes → US dollar strengthens → risk assets come under pressure → crypto market trades sideways
But in reality, it’s more complicated: The narrative of BTC as “digital gold” is maturing, and traditional safe-haven logic is starting to apply to BTC.
That means in the future, BTC’s price action may track more like gold, not simply a risk asset.
This is a trend worth watching continuously.
Do you think BTC today is more like “gold” or “tech stocks”?
Now BTC suddenly jumped 5%. What’s your first reaction?
A. Buy immediately—I don’t want to miss out B. Wait for a pullback to enter C. First look at volume/liquidity, then make a decision D. Do nothing—wait for system signals
There’s no standard answer, but your choice will tell me what kind of trader you are.
Many people don’t want to cut losses, because “as long as you haven’t sold, it doesn’t count as a real loss.”
But the market doesn’t care about your mental accounting.
A stop loss isn’t admitting defeat— it’s executing the rules you set before you emotionally got involved. You’re not losing to the market; you’re winning a moment of control over yourself.
Only those who can cut losses can keep surviving in the market. Those who don’t will eventually give back all their profits—one day.
During the time I was working as a KOL, I wasn’t actually happy.
Every day I had to produce “professional-looking” content. And when I spoke honestly—sometimes the direction wasn’t even that clear, but the platform still needed you to give “a clear point of view.”
After a while, you wouldn’t know whether you were analyzing, or simply performing analysis.
Later, I stepped out and went back to independent trading.
At first, my income was lower, but I could finally sleep.
Now, every post I share on the square is based on my real observations and what I’ve done in practice. I put all the gains and losses down—no hiding.
Not many people do things like this, but I think this is the right way.