After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
Resistance levels: within the 1–2% range above (there was heavy prior trading) Support levels: around 1.5% below (along the uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If the price breaks above resistance with increased volume → direction is confirmed, you can follow If price rises on low volume → wait for a pullback and then reassess
If you could go back to the first day of trading, what would you most want to tell yourself?
My answer:
"First learn position/risk management, then learn technical analysis."
Most people’s order is the opposite—learn candlesticks, indicators, and patterns first. You may still be able to call the right direction, but you end up losing money.
The reason is simple: you didn’t do proper risk management.
Even if you only have a 60% win rate, and you pair it with a 2R risk-reward ratio, long term it’s still a positive expected value.
Just entering the market: you’re desperate to double every day. After a year: you start learning to wait for signals. After three years: you realize that “not doing” is a skill.
The market won’t disappear, and opportunities show up every week. But your principal—one mistake in using it and it could be gone.
Don’t use a “fast” pace; follow a “slow” strategy. Don’t trade by “guessing”; trade by “waiting.”
When I built my first quantitative trading system, I stepped into three pitfalls.
Pitfall 1: Overfitting Backtests looked unbelievably great, but once I went live, it all collapsed. Reason: I tuned the parameters too closely to historical data.
Pitfall 2: Ignoring trading fees In backtests, I earned $50 per trade, but in live trading after fees, I only had $15 left. My returns were cut by 70% straight away.
Pitfall 3: No stop-loss logic “Quant systems won’t do crazy trades.” Until one time the market moved sharply and wiped out 20%, that’s when I learned that quant systems can also blow up.
The SYS series—was built gradually only after stepping into these three pitfalls. Without the pitfalls, there would be no system.
Resistance levels: in the 1–2% range above (with prior dense trading) Support levels: around 1.5% below (uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks through resistance with increased volume → direction is confirmed; you can follow If it rises on low volume → wait for a pullback and then reassess
A day with no trades is also a type of trading decision.
Volume is the most important key factor today. If the price is rising but the volume isn’t keeping up—that’s a fake breakout. Don’t chase. Let the volume come in first, then talk about direction.
Today's strategy: Wait for volume confirmation → then decide on direction If there’s no volume → stay sidelined out of the market; cash is also a position
Right now, BTC suddenly jumped 5%—what’s your first reaction?
A. Buy immediately—I don’t want to miss out B. Wait for a pullback before entering C. First look at volume/market activity, then decide D. Do nothing and wait for system signals
There’s no standard answer, but your choice will tell me what kind of trader you are.
Some people do 10 trades a day—burn themselves out, and end up with negative returns. Some people do just 1 trade per week—wait calmly, and their returns stay stable.
This isn’t a question of how hardworking you are; it’s a matching problem.
High-frequency strategies → you need to judge quickly, execute quickly Low-frequency strategies → you need to wait patiently, hold patiently
You’re using a low-frequency strategy, but operating it with a high-frequency pace— checking the charts every day, interfering frequently—
You’re not trading—you’re disrupting your own system.
First figure out what tempo your system follows, then decide how you should just sit and wait.
Why do I trust a quantitative trading system, not “intuition”?
Because intuition can fool you, but data won’t.
Looking back at my trading records from the past five years: · Two years of trading based on intuition: massive account fluctuations, and so did my mood · Three years after going system-driven: much more stable, and even losses were within expectations
Quant trading isn’t perfect, but it accomplishes one very important thing: It prevents “emotions” from interfering with decisions.
If a signal comes, act. If no signal comes, wait. That’s it.
Resistance levels: in the upper 1–2% range (with prior dense trading) Support levels: around 1.5% below (uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks above resistance with increased volume → the direction is confirmed; you can follow If it rises on declining volume → wait for a pullback and then reassess
Even days without trading are a kind of trading decision.