I assumed a TermMax loan had one boring ending: repay the debt token and get the collateral back. The protocol gives the borrower another route.

Suppose a GT records 1,000 USDC of debt.

Route A: repay 1,000 USDC directly.

Route B: acquire 1,000 matching Fixed-Rate Tokens and use those FTs to settle the debt. If FT trades at $0.96, the purchase costs $960 before fees, gas and slippage. At $0.99, it costs $990.

Why can that happen? FT trades before maturity. Its price responds to time remaining, prevailing rates and available liquidity. If the market moves in the borrowerโ€™s favor, buying back the claim can cost less than repaying at face value.

That is not a guaranteed discount. A large FT order may move through the curve, and execution costs can erase a small saving.

My practical check would be simple: compare the total cost of acquiring enough FT with the direct debt-token repayment. The direct repayment amount gives the borrower a known contractual ceiling before execution costs, but it does not force the more expensive exit when the secondary market offers a cheaper one.

@TermMax #TermMax