The analysis is very good and clear

📉 $JAGER – When the issuance amount is too large, it overshadows the burning mechanism

Although promoted with a strong token burning mechanism, JAGER is still showing signs of weakness and a significant decline in value. The core reason lies in the total supply and the excessive issuance, making the effectiveness of token burning insufficient to offset the selling pressure in the market.

🔎 Key issues of JAGER:
• ❗ Huge supply: The high circulating token amount creates continuous downward price pressure
• 🔥 Burning a lot but not effectively: The burning rate does not keep pace with the decline
• 📉 Prolonged price drop: Investor confidence weakens, low liquidity
• 📣 Much promotion – limited actual value: Lack of clear applications and sustainable cash flow

⚠️ The reality of the market shows:
Token burning is not the only decisive factor for price increase. If supply is not controlled, there is no real ecosystem or clear demand for use, then burning is merely symbolic and difficult to reverse the long-term downward trend.

📌 Conclusion:
$JAGER is a typical example of a token with excessive issuance, where even though the team makes strong burning efforts, the value still declines sharply due to the imbalance of supply and demand. Investors need to be vigilant, thoroughly assess risks, rather than just looking at the number of tokens burned.