Total supply: 14,600T tokens, burning 3 billion is nothing, right? :))
SafeBSC total supply is 420B
$Jager Marketing type stepping on others' heads😂
-Heard there's some project copying, editing, pasting, and then labeling as improved. It's new, so there's still FOMO effect in the bad market, sending troops all over the project's square to herd, huh guys? Is there any way to block this because it looks so annoying, or should we just let them die like a brand?
- These guys specialize in tagging other coins to sink, to step on, to attract. So entering the squares of reputable projects reads titles like BTC, Jager... but the content is just some lousy project, with only a few holders.
>Then they also read! They say Jager lives off the community's attention, while their project is being herded, so there's no need. No need, yet they send troops to spam recklessly to sink other projects, why?😂
>Then they say Jager has no volume to burn, while their project doesn't need volume. But they forget which project is trading without volume?😂 No volume, where's the money for bonds and DCA?
>Then they keep saying their project generates real profits thanks to DCA BTC... but they don't know Jager pays dividends to holders in BNB.😂 And they forget that the Jager community holders are still there.
>Then they boast that their project has burned up to 3T since inception! But they forget to mention that Jager has burned 3T daily. 😂
>And then, they keep relying on the FOMO effect to sink other projects, they compare the lightness of small projects with the heaviness of large projects. But they don't tell newcomers whose DeV it is, up to now 99.9% of projects have been scammed like this😂
>Then they entice long-term holding, but they don't know that soon they have to move to their country's legal exchange to trade, so the door of the project's DEV they are herding is much narrower than Jager's..😎
-Heard there's some project copying, editing, pasting, and then labeling as improved. It's new, so there's still FOMO effect in the bad market, sending troops all over the project's square to herd, huh guys? Is there any way to block this because it looks so annoying, or should we just let them die like a brand?
- These guys specialize in tagging other coins to sink, to step on, to attract. So entering the squares of reputable projects reads titles like BTC, Jager... but the content is just some lousy project, with only a few holders.
>Then they also read! They say Jager lives off the community's attention, while their project is being herded, so there's no need. No need, yet they send troops to spam recklessly to sink other projects, why?😂
>Then they say Jager has no volume to burn, while their project doesn't need volume. But they forget which project is trading without volume?😂 No volume, where's the money for bonds and DCA?
>Then they keep saying their project generates real profits thanks to DCA BTC... but they don't know Jager pays dividends to holders in BNB.😂 And they forget that the Jager community holders are still there.
>Then they boast that their project has burned up to 3T since inception! But they forget to mention that Jager has burned 3T daily. 😂
>And then, they keep relying on the FOMO effect to sink other projects, they compare the lightness of small projects with the heaviness of large projects. But they don't tell newcomers whose DeV it is, up to now 99.9% of projects have been scammed like this😂
>Then they entice long-term holding, but they don't know that soon they have to move to their country's legal exchange to trade, so the door of the project's DEV they are herding is much narrower than Jager's..😎
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
Jager
Alpha
0.0₉3754
+9.71%