If you are an old holder of MATIC,

You must have gone through these stages:

The king of ETH scaling

The public chain with the most enterprise cooperation

Layer2 must come with a plan.

But by today, you probably only have one question left in your mind:

Why has it done everything but not increased in value?

Let me first give you a conclusion without beating around the bush:

👉 The issue with MATIC is not the bear market,

But rather: The Layer2 narrative itself is being repriced in the prolonged bear market, and even marginalized.

First, let's look at today's reality: Layer2 is no longer a 'must-have.'

Look back at the recent market focus:

ETF → BTC / ETH

Risk experiment → SOL

Stablecoin → TRX / BNB

Emotions → Meme

What about Layer2?

👉 Almost no main position.

It's not just MATIC,

But the entire Layer2 sector—

Has been overall 'devalued' by the market.

Two, why do people say MATIC is a typical case of 'doing the old logic to the extreme, but losing to the new cycle'?

You must admit one thing:

👉 MATIC has almost completed 'the correct answer of the previous Layer2'.

Enterprise cooperation:

Meta

Nike

Starbucks

Technical route:

PoS

zk transformation

Ecological construction:

Developers

Toolchain

Fund support

But here comes the problem:

When the market cycle changes,

'The perfect answer of the old cycle,'

May be worthless in the new cycle.

Three, Layer2 narrative, why suddenly not appealing in a slow bear?

The reason is very realistic and very cruel:

1️⃣ ETH has not been 'squeezed out'

Gas has not continuously spiraled out of control

User growth is slowing

👉 The 'urgency' for expansion has disappeared.

2️⃣ Multiple chains coexist, users are no longer obsessed with 'returning to ETH'

SOL

New public chain

Applications directly deployed natively

👉 The logic of 'must return to ETH' has loosened.

3️⃣ Layer2s start to become competitive

Arbitrum

Optimism

zkSync

Starknet

👉 MATIC is no longer monopolizing the mindset.

Four, a very crucial point that few people mention:

Enterprise cooperation ≠ Secondary market buying

This is the most fatal misconception about MATIC.

What you see is:

Large companies use Polygon

Brands issuing NFTs

Web2 collaborations continue

But you overlooked one thing:

👉 These collaborations almost do not require continuous buying of MATIC in the secondary market.

Gas consumption is extremely low

Can settle internally

Cost controllable

The result is:

The ecology is lively,

But the price is not 'needed'.

Five, why is MATIC in a slow bear, even more uncomfortable than 'inactive coins'?

Because it attracts:

👉 Long-term, rational, believing in 'fundamentals' funds.

But the cruelest point of the slow bear is:

It will continuously punish the logic of 'long-term correct, but short-term no return'.

The opportunity cost of holding MATIC is:

BTC ETF

SOL volatility

Meme emotions

In the slow bear,

This will create continuous psychological torment.

Six, from the perspective of funds, what is happening with MATIC?

In summary:

👉 Funds are not shorting MATIC,

But rather 'no longer prioritizing it'.

Not proactively configured

No emotional speculation

No main storyline

This state is more dangerous than being hit by bad news.

Seven, putting MATIC into today's structure, you will suddenly understand

Current market role distribution:

BTC: Macro anchor

ETH: The core asset that has been devalued

SOL: Risk thermometer

BNB: Platform stabilizer

TRX: Stablecoin channel

Meme: Emotional outlet

MATIC: The 'old expansion logic' that has been delayed in fulfillment

Pay attention to these words:

👉 Delayed fulfillment.

Not a denial,

But rather delayed.

Eight, when might MATIC be needed by the market again?

Only under one of the following conditions:

1️⃣ ETH again faces severe Gas pressure

2️⃣ zk technology becomes the only mainstream expansion solution

3️⃣ Layer2 is regulated or capital is clearly 'incorporated' as infrastructure

Otherwise, in the slow bear:

👉 It is difficult to become a main asset.

Nine, my core judgment (very direct)

I won't talk to you about feelings, only cycles:

MATIC is not a failure,

But it has completed 'the story of the previous round',

But this round, the market doesn't want to listen anymore.

This is more cruel than bad news.$MATIC