Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

Binance Completes Sandbox Integration on Base Network
Binance has successfully integrated its sandbox environment on the Base network, enabling developers to test applications and smart contracts in a secure, risk-free setting. The move aims to foster innovation, streamline development, and encourage experimentation within the blockchain ecosystem.
$SAND 

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

SAND

--

--

70

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@Square-Creator-f40a0e4b6ee9

Explore More From Creator

Crypto Industry Pushes Back Against Proposed Stablecoin Rewards Ban The global crypto industry—comprising stablecoin issuers, exchanges, DeFi platforms, and blockchain advocacy groups—has voiced strong opposition to proposals seeking to ban rewards or yield on stablecoins. Industry leaders argue that stablecoin rewards are a key innovation that supports adoption, payments efficiency, and competition with traditional banking products. From a money supply perspective, banning stablecoin rewards could reduce demand for stablecoins, slowing their circulation and limiting dollar liquidity within crypto markets. This may push capital back toward traditional banks or offshore alternatives, weakening stablecoins’ role as a digital extension of fiat money and potentially reducing the U.S. dollar’s influence in on-chain financial activity.

--

Potential Impact of the U.S. Clarity Act on Bitcoin’s Price Examined The U.S. Clarity Act is a proposed regulatory framework aimed at clearly defining how digital assets—especially Bitcoin—are classified and regulated in the United States. The Act seeks to reduce uncertainty by clarifying the roles of regulators such as the SEC and CFTC, and by distinguishing commodities like Bitcoin from securities. Who they are: The U.S. Congress is the legislative body proposing the Clarity Act, while the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) are the key regulators whose oversight boundaries would be clarified. Bitcoin, widely regarded as a decentralized commodity, is central to the discussion. From a market and price perspective, regulatory clarity is generally positive for Bitcoin. Clear rules lower legal risk for institutions such as asset managers, banks, and ETFs, potentially unlocking fresh capital inflows. Increased institutional participation can support demand, improve liquidity, and reduce long-term volatility—factors that tend to be bullish for BTC price over time. From a money supply perspective, clearer regulation may encourage broader adoption of Bitcoin as a store of value and collateral asset. As more capital flows into regulated BTC products, circulating supply on exchanges could tighten, reinforcing scarcity dynamics. This may strengthen Bitcoin’s narrative as a hedge against fiat monetary expansion, especially during periods of easing U.S. monetary policy. $BTC

--

BlackRock’s IBIT ETF Shows Resilience Despite Negative Returns BlackRock’s iBIT ETF, a Bitcoin-focused exchange-traded fund designed to give investors regulated exposure to BTC, has demonstrated resilience in investor flows and asset retention even amid recent negative returns in Bitcoin’s price. The ETF is managed by BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, and is structured to track Bitcoin through regulated custodial holdings and institutional oversight. Despite short-term price headwinds, IBIT has maintained strong investor interest and relatively stable assets under management, reflecting ongoing confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term narrative. Money Supply and Market Impact: From a money supply perspective, steady flows into IBIT—even during downturns—can reduce liquid BTC available on exchanges as tokens are held within the ETF structure. This dynamic may support market stability by limiting immediate sell pressure, while institutional confidence can help broaden participation and deepen liquidity in regulated vehicles without directly altering Bitcoin’s fixed issuance schedule. $BTC

--

Jump Crypto Transfers USD1 Stablecoin to BitGo Jump Crypto, the digital asset trading and infrastructure arm of Jump Trading Group (a major global quantitative trading firm), has transferred USD1, a U.S. dollar–pegged stablecoin, to BitGo. BitGo is a leading U.S.-based crypto custodian and trust company known for providing regulated custody, settlement, and treasury services to institutions. Why it matters: Such transfers typically signal liquidity management, custody reallocation, or preparation for trading, settlement, or collateral use rather than retail activity. Using BitGo suggests an institutional-grade move, as BitGo is widely trusted by funds, exchanges, and stablecoin issuers for secure asset storage. Money supply impact: This transfer does not change total stablecoin supply but affects circulating liquidity. Moving USD1 into institutional custody can temporarily reduce active market float if the funds are held as reserves or collateral. If later deployed for trading or lending, it could re-inject liquidity into crypto markets, supporting short-term market activity without expanding overall money supply. $USD1

--

Epstein’s Connection to the Early Bitcoin Ecosystem Unveiled New reports have highlighted previously unknown links between Jeffrey Epstein, a disgraced financier, and individuals active in the early Bitcoin ecosystem during Bitcoin’s formative years. These connections are said to involve early technologists, investors, or intermediaries rather than direct control or ownership of the Bitcoin network itself. Who they are: Jeffrey Epstein was a financier with extensive ties to elite academic, financial, and tech circles before his criminal convictions. The early Bitcoin ecosystem consisted of cypherpunks, developers, miners, and early investors experimenting with a decentralized digital currency outside traditional finance. Why it matters: While Bitcoin remains decentralized and permissionless, revelations about early participants can influence narratives, trust, and public perception, especially among institutions assessing reputational risk. Importantly, no evidence suggests Bitcoin’s protocol or monetary policy was affected. Money supply impact: There is no direct impact on Bitcoin’s money supply, which is algorithmically fixed. However, renewed controversy could increase short-term volatility if sentiment weakens, potentially affecting liquidity flows without altering BTC issuance or long-term scarcity. $BTC

--

Latest News

Quantum Computing Poses Significant Challenge to Bitcoin Security

--

U.S. Treasury Conducts Significant Debt Buyback

--

Uniswap Governance Vote on Fee Switch Proposal Commences

--

Global Liquidity Expected to Improve by 2026, Says Delphi Digital

--

Significant Bitcoin Transfer Observed Between Anonymous Addresses

--

Trending Articles

💰 $DOT YEAR-ENDING CLOSING PRICE 2020 → ~$9 2021 → ~$27

Cruz Hoosock F7

🚀 $LUNC : THE PHOENIX RISES? WHY THIS WEEK IS A GAME-CHANGE

Here is Why You Need To Hold 2,314 XRP: Details

BeMaster BuySmart

🚀 $ADA Year-End Pattern Alert! 📊 2020 → $0.18 2021 → $1.3

🚨 Bitcoin OVERSOLD? CRASH incoming??! Bitcoin just flashe

Professor Mende - Bonuz Ecosystem Founder

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences