Pro: Bitcoin is more suitable for future risk aversion needs
1. Absolute scarcity + decentralization, breaking trust dependency: A total supply of 21 million coins that is immutable, blockchain consensus does not require third-party endorsement, avoiding the credit risk of gold custody and the institutional dependency of tokenized gold, is the 'non-manipulated hard currency' of the digital age.
2. Global liquidity + growth potential, balancing risk aversion and returns: 24/7 trading without geographical restrictions, institutional funds continue to enter, raising consensus. Even with short-term fluctuations, in the long run, it remains a highly elastic asset against fiat currency inflation, rather than merely a 'store of value' tool.
3. Technology iteration + scene extension, the value boundary continues to expand: Layer 2 scaling, cross-border payment landing, etc., allow it to be more than just 'digital gold,' but also become the value base of the Web3 ecosystem. The risk-averse attributes combined with technological dividends show growth far exceeding that of tokenized gold relying on physical assets.
@Binance Earn Official @币安广场
4. Tokenized gold ties down physical assets and custody, while Bitcoin achieves 'trustless threshold + absolute scarcity' through blockchain. In the digital age, risk aversion should break free from the shackles of the physical!
5. Anti-inflation ≠ just preserving value, Bitcoin not only carries global liquidity but also benefits from the continuous empowerment of the Web3 ecosystem, with risk aversion combined with growth attributes. How can 'gold in disguise' compare?
6. Low correlation ≠ true robustness; tokenized gold is essentially a replica of traditional assets, whereas Bitcoin's decentralized consensus is the ultimate confidence against policy risk and institutional manipulation!
Counterpoint: Tokenized gold is a more robust risk-averse choice
1. Physical anchoring + historical endorsement, risk bottom line is more solid: Each token corresponds to a sufficient amount of physical gold. Gold has a natural risk-averse gene due to its thousands of years of anti-inflation and low volatility properties, avoiding the bubble risk of Bitcoin, which lacks physical support.
2. Transparent auditing + compliance-friendly, lowering investment barriers: Third-party real-time audits ensure asset authenticity, and blockchain technology enables small-scale splitting and convenient transactions, retaining the 'stability' of gold while solving the pain points of physical gold storage and liquidation, making it suitable for ordinary investors.
3. Low correlation + anti-cyclicality, the essence of risk aversion is purer: It has an extremely low correlation with cryptocurrency and stock market fluctuations, maintaining asset value better during extreme market conditions. In contrast, Bitcoin is still affected by the technology sector and regulatory policies, mixing its risk-averse attributes with 'speculative attributes,' leading to insufficient stability.
Debate summary
The core disagreement between the two lies in the 'essence of risk aversion': Bitcoin is a 'digital consensus-driven high-potential risk-averse asset,' suitable for investors who can withstand volatility and are optimistic about the Web3 trend; tokenized gold is a 'robust risk-averse asset anchored in physical value,' suitable for investors seeking value preservation and averse to extreme volatility. There are no absolutes of superiority or inferiority, only different trade-offs regarding 'risk and return'—
