In the morning, everyone was talking about zama's og nft having new issuance weight, and there might be surprises. I understand it as an airdrop. Regarding new issuance, this article will discuss the gameplay. For the first phase, I didn't get the nft, and for the fourth phase, it hasn't been released. The image source is quoted from this article. I hope miden @0xMiden can also bring new ideas. As for the new issuance logic, I wonder if anyone has played river's Dutch auction, where everyone bids, and the final transaction is made at the lowest price according to the chip distribution. This method exploits human weaknesses, leading people to think that since someone will bid low, I just need to drive up the price. Those who have had this experience know that the final result of river points is that everyone ends up with high-priced chips. My personal suggestion is: you should bid at the price point you think you can make money, at 10% of the chips. If you can't get it, you can't get it; it's better than buying at a high price. Zama's advantage over river points is that it is private and not publicly transparent. The downside is that the project party can control the price in this new issuance. Everyone has seen river points; if you get high-priced chips, you have to help pump the price, or you'll end up stuck with them. Or those who didn't grab the chips might think: oh, the current price is cheaper than the new issuance price, I should buy in at the bottom. Everyone is welcome to communicate; my research may not be correct, but it is definitely my genuine insight. The advantage of the privacy track is that it keeps some information accessible to everyone from being exposed to the public eye. However, the biggest share of blockchain privacy might still be wash trading. This only represents my personal opinion, please don’t criticize if you dislike it. #Miden