Many people still regard YGG as an old model of 'renting NFTs + earning + guilds' — but if you are willing to broaden your perspective a bit, you will find that it truly has the potential to become the hub of 'infrastructure + traffic entrance + player network' in the future Web3 gaming world. Today, I want to discuss why I increasingly have faith in YGG from three angles that you usually pay little attention to, but are crucial — and I hope you can think seriously about it.
Let me first tell you my judgment logic. If I were a player/investor/observer who values 'long-term value + structure + stability potential', I would regard YGG as a core target of 'invisible infrastructure + ecological entrance + assets + community'. It may not skyrocket in the short term, but it is likely to play its truly underestimated role in the future.
Why do people say YGG has the potential to become 'infrastructure + player network + ecological entry'?
It has a structure interwoven with multiple channels for players/assets/liquidity/content/community.
Many new blockchain games start from scratch to recruit players, distribute assets, and build communities. But YGG has a complete set of player networks + tokens/NFTs/tasks/community mechanisms + cross-game/cross-project flow experience. This means new projects do not need to start from scratch but can rely on a 'mature player/community/assets/traffic entry' — this is extremely attractive to anyone wanting to develop blockchain games. In other words, for game projects, YGG is not just a source of players but also a kind of 'initial infrastructure + issuance entry + asset pool + community support.'
It lowers the entry barriers + player burdens for Web3 games.
Traditional blockchain games/NFT games have a high entry barrier for new players: wallets, blockchain interaction, asset concerns, contract risks, liquidity... Many players do not want to bear these troubles and do not understand them. This is why Web3 is difficult to popularize on a large scale. One of YGG's values is packaging these 'troubles' well: allowing players to participate through leasing, tasks, community support, and familiar mechanisms — like hiding the complex infrastructure, so players only feel the gameplay and sense of belonging. This mechanism of 'making it easy for players to enter + participate + experience + grow' is essential for the popularization of Web3 games.
It does not rely on a single game but is a 'cross-project + cross-ecosystem + continuous operation' platform.
If a single game fails, everything is over. However, YGG's layout does not rely on just one game, but on multiple games + multiple collaborations + multiple projects + community + assets + tokens. It acts like an ecological network, a collection of assets + users + traffic + issuance + community. When one game cools off, new projects may emerge, or players may migrate from one project to another. This kind of diversified structure itself has risk-resistant and sustainable value. It is more stable for the ecosystem, tokens, and community than ordinary single projects.
Why are concepts like 'infrastructure + entry + network + assets + community' seldom regarded as sources of value?
Because it is not the kind of thing that can erupt immediately. It has no airdrop, no tenfold increase within a month, and no story of making you rich overnight. It requires time, patience, participation, observation, and a process of 'settling' with it. Precisely because it is not stimulating, many people choose to wait and feel that 'playing for quick money or chasing trends is more enjoyable.'
But precisely because of this 'non-stimulating + slow + stable + structured' project, after several rounds of bull and bear markets, it will leave behind the most valuable foundation. Just like real-world infrastructure — high-speed rail, the internet, basic construction, urban planning — they may be inconspicuous, but they determine whether a city or country can sustain development.
YGG is likely such infrastructure for the Web3 gaming world — not for show, but to give the entire ecosystem roots, foundations, and sustainability.
If you want to participate in YGG — I suggest treating it as such an asset/strategy.
Consider it as a foundational asset + long-term layout: do not focus on short-term ups and downs, but treat it as a kind of 'bottom line + future possibilities + structured assets + ecological participation rights.'
Approach it with a combination of 'participation + contribution + community + observation + assets + tokens': not just with the aim of making money but to participate in the ecosystem, contribute to the community, observe the projects, and allocate long-term.
Tolerating fluctuations + waiting patiently + examining mechanisms: because infrastructure-type projects may have slow returns and more noticeable fluctuations. But if the mechanism is sound, the community is stable, and asset design is reasonable, it can be more durable than those chasing trends.
Treat it as part of the entire Web3 gaming ecosystem, rather than an isolated bet: the future world of blockchain games cannot be supported by a single hit, but must rely on infrastructure, entry points, communities, assets, and multiple dimensions working together. YGG could be an important part of that.
My personal vision for the next 12–24 months — if these conditions are met, YGG is expected to realize its value of 'infrastructure + entry + assets + community.'
More new blockchain games/projects are willing to integrate the YGG community + resources, treating it as an issuance + traffic entry. As a result, YGG's players/assets/community/token circulation will become more active, and the overall ecosystem will be more stable.
NFT/game assets + tasks/contribution mechanisms + token economics + community governance mechanisms continue to improve, allowing ordinary players/new users to participate, rather than just speculators.
Cross-project / cross-chain / cross-game / cross-community cooperation is beginning to take shape. For example, a common mechanism for player assets, resource sharing mechanisms, contract common mechanisms... When infrastructure is connected, YGG's value will be magnified.
The market's understanding of Web3 games + blockchain game communities + asset ecosystems + player infrastructure has improved, no longer just looking at 'single token/single game ROI,' but considering 'overall ecological value + long-term traffic entry + asset & community value.' This is an upgrade for the entire industry and also YGG's advantage.
If most of the above conditions are met, YGG's value lies not in how much it rises in the short term, but in whether it constitutes a part of 'infrastructure + entry + players + assets + community + traffic' in the Web3 gaming world — in this sense, it is more deserving of serious consideration than many so-called 'popular projects + hit games + high-risk high-return positioning' projects.
Here's a realistic judgment framework 👇
When you see projects like YGG, first ask yourself three questions:
Is it building a structure that walks on multiple legs, such as 'infrastructure + ecological entry + assets + tokens + players + community + issuance + liquidity'?
Is it laying the groundwork for the potential explosion of Web3 gaming waves in the future, rather than betting on the success of a single game?
Is it suitable to participate with a 'long-term + combination + multidimensional + patient + structured' mindset rather than 'short-term + high returns + speculation + blind investment'?
If your answer is affirmative, perhaps you should seriously consider adding it to your long-term assets/participation/observation list. If you are pursuing quick money, short-term fluctuations, and speculative profits, it might not be suitable for you.
Finally, I want to say:
In the context of Web3 games being refreshed by new projects, constantly affected by NFT speculation and token waves, what can truly support the next cycle is certainly not 'the next hit' — but projects that 'stabilize traffic + stabilize the community + stabilize mechanisms + stabilize player bases + stabilize asset structures + stabilize tokens + stabilize ecological entry.'
I believe YGG's opportunity lies in its potential to become such a project. If you are willing, we can observe together — not for a spike, nor for speculative trading, but steadily participating in the potential arrival of a true Web3 gaming ecological revolution.
