mev

When trading on a decentralized exchange, most users assume the only cost involved is the visible network fee. Yet, from time to time, the final result feels slightly off: fewer tokens received, or a worse price than expected. What’s happening behind the scenes is not random friction. It’s part of a parallel economy known as Maximal Extractable Value, or MEV.
MEV refers to the additional value that block producers, whether miners in proof-of-work systems or validators in proof-of-stake networks, can extract by controlling how transactions are ordered within a block. As blockchains have evolved beyond mining, the term “Miner Extractable Value” gradually gave way to its broader successor.

How MEV Emerges in the First Place
Every on-chain transaction follows a short but critical journey before confirmation. When you approve a swap, that transaction enters the mempool, a publicly visible queue where pending transactions wait to be included in the next block. Anyone can see what’s sitting there, including trade size, token pairs, and gas fees.
Block producers decide which transactions get confirmed and in what sequence. While fees usually influence this order, the real leverage lies in rearranging transactions to capture profit. In practice, most validators don’t hunt for these opportunities themselves. Instead, specialized actors known as searchers do the heavy lifting.
Searchers operate automated bots that constantly monitor the mempool. When they detect a profitable opportunity, they submit their own transactions with carefully calculated fees, often sharing a portion of the profit with the validator who includes them in the optimal position.
The Different Faces of MEV
Not all MEV activity carries the same consequences. Some forms quietly improve market efficiency, while others directly reduce user value.
Arbitrage is the most widely accepted example. When the same asset trades at slightly different prices across platforms, MEV bots step in, buying where it’s cheaper and selling where it’s more expensive. This process compresses price gaps and keeps markets aligned, benefiting the ecosystem as a whole.
Liquidations play a similarly functional role. In decentralized lending protocols, under-collateralized positions must be closed quickly to maintain solvency. MEV bots race to trigger these liquidations because they earn a fee for doing so. While painful for borrowers, this mechanism prevents systemic failure.
The most controversial category is the sandwich attack. Here, a bot detects a large user trade in the mempool and exploits it by placing one transaction just before and another immediately after the victim’s trade. The user unknowingly buys at an inflated price, while the bot pockets the difference. This behavior doesn’t improve efficiency; it simply transfers value from traders to bots.
Why MEV Is Both Useful and Problematic
From one angle, MEV strengthens networks. Arbitrage and liquidation incentives help maintain accurate pricing and protocol stability. The extra revenue also makes validator participation more attractive, which can improve decentralization and security.
From another angle, MEV feels like an invisible tax. Everyday users pay worse prices without realizing why. During intense competition, bots flood the network with transactions, pushing gas fees higher for everyone. In extreme cases, outsized MEV rewards can even tempt validators to manipulate block production in destabilizing ways.
The Push Toward Fairer Transaction Ordering
The industry isn’t ignoring these issues. Several approaches aim to reduce harmful MEV without breaking core blockchain principles.
Fair ordering mechanisms attempt to sequence transactions based on arrival time rather than bidding wars. Projects such as Chainlink are exploring Fair Sequencing Services that limit validator discretion.
Another approach focuses on privacy. Some wallets and decentralized applications now allow users to submit trades privately, bypassing the public mempool entirely. Platforms like Uniswap have experimented with these designs to reduce exposure to front-running strategies.
Educational efforts also matter. Resources from Binance have helped traders understand how MEV works and how to protect themselves, especially when executing large transactions.
Final Thoughts
MEV sits at the intersection of incentive design and user experience. It can quietly stabilize markets while simultaneously draining value from unsuspecting traders. As blockchain infrastructure matures, the focus is shifting toward reducing the most harmful forms of MEV without sacrificing decentralization.
Until those protections become universal, awareness remains your best defense. Understanding how transaction ordering works, and choosing tools that limit mempool exposure, can make a meaningful difference when navigating today’s on-chain markets.
#Binance #wendy #MEV $BTC $ETH $BNB

#BinanceAlphaAlert is a platform launched by #Binance , the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, to spotlight early-stage crypto projects with a transparent token listing process. It provides users with a unique opportunity to discover emerging projects and potentially invest in them before they are listed on the main exchange.
Key Features of Binance Alpha:
- AI-driven Market Insights: Real-time updates on cryptocurrency prices, trading volumes, and market trends to help traders stay ahead.
- Exclusive reserch report
In-depth reports prepared by Binance's team of analysts covering new token launches, project evaluations, and market sentiment analysis.
- Customizable alerts
Personalized alerts for market fluctuations to ensure users never miss critical trading opportunities.
- Learning Hub
An extensive library of educational content for beginners, ranging from blockchain basics to advanced trading strategies.
- Quick Buy Feature
A game-changing tool that streamlines decentralized exchange (#DEX ) trading with smart slippage adjustments, anti-#MEV $SOL protections, and automatic token selection.
How Binance Alpha Works:
- Tokens are carefully selected based on industry insight and data analysis, focusing on projects with strong community support and growing traction.
- Featured tokens are showcased for 24 hours, allowing users to explore project details and buy tokens using the Quick Buy feature.
- After the showcase period, tokens remain available in the Alpha section of the Markets tab for tracking and trading.[¹](https://nftevening.com/binance-alpha/) [²](https://thenewscrypto.com/binance-wallet-launches-binance-alpha-to-highlight-promising-projects-and-boost-transparency/)
Binance Alpha aims to increase transparency in the token listing process, foster innovation, and support the growth of the Web3 ecosystem. By providing a supportive environment, it connects users with promising projects and helps blockchain developers showcase their work.[³](https://coingape.com/binance-alpha-to-spotlight-innovative-crypto-projects-and-future-token-listings/)

MEV bots Profit in any market condition.

Those in the know are already Millionaires.

DEEP DIVE THREAD:

- What exactly is MEV?
#MEV

- Different types of MEV.

- Strategies for earning from MEV🧵👇

In this thread we will cover:

- What are MEV bots?
- How do they work?
- The sandwich attack
- Arbitrage play
- Liquidation hunting
- The ethical MEV
What are MEV Bots?

- MEV stands for Maximum Extractable Value

- These bots operate similarly to high-frequency traders on Wall Street, but in the DeFi space.

- They scan the blockchain, searching for chances to manipulate transactions to their advantage, always staying Ahead

How do they work?

- These bots make money by changing the order of transactions, adding, or removing them from a block to get the most profit.

- It's like playing a card game where the dealer can see everyone's cards that's what these bots can do.

Sandwich Attack

Here's how it works:

- You place a trade.

- The bot spots it in the mempool and
buys just before you do, driving the price up.

- Your trade executes at this inflated price.

- The bot then sells immediately after,
profiting from the price increase.

Arbitrage Play

- Imagine there's a price difference for SOL between two DEXs

- MEV bots instantly detect this discrepancy

- They buy SOL at the lower price on one DEX and sell it at the higher price on another

Before your trade even goes through, they've already made a profit

Liquidation Hunting

- If your collateral value drops too low, your position could be liquidated.

- MEV bots constantly watch for these moments and act fast.

- They take advantage of these situations by grabbing the best deals and bonuses before others can react.

Memecoin created a Goldmine for MEV attacks

It's well known that memecoins are extremely volatile and notorious for wild price swings and low liquidity, which often lead to high slippage

In the current market, we're seeing average slippage rates around 35%

What does this mean?
- Let's consider a scenario where a trader plans to buy $1,000 worth of a coin, facing 35% slippage.

- An MEV bot could potentially capture half of this slippage, which is 17.5%, turning it into profit.

- That amounts to $175 from just one trade.

- Now imagine this happening over 100 times in a day.

The total profit for the bot could exceed $17,500 daily.
- MEV is big business, with hundreds of millions of dollars flowing through it every year.

- Bots, miners, and validators share the profits in this expanding industry.

- The competition is fierce, turning blockchains into battlegrounds for profit.
- You can track MEV using tools like Flashbots or Dune Analytics.

- These tools allow you to see who's earning what and where it's happening in real time.

- Since blockchains are open, you can dive in and explore the action yourself if you're curious.
- Based on my experience, a well-configured ChatGPT MEV bot can easily generate $5,000 daily

- Profits often depend on market activity, volatility, and how well the bot is configured

Building a fully passive income with these bots is crucial before they become widely accessible
@MasterOfCrypto Official written by
published by @UNIC_PLATO
For more information go @MasterOfCrypto Official
#Write2Earn
#SECCrypto2.0
#SandwichAttack
#BTCNextATH
$BTC
$ANKR
$ETH If you want to know how to create an MEV bot and earn money, comment ❤️. We'll share a simple strategy to make a bot that earns profits daily.

In the world of DeFi, every transaction floats in an invisible, dark forest where predators known as 'MEV bots' lurk. They extract value from ordinary users' transactions through techniques like sandwich attacks and front-running, resulting in an 'invisible tax' that amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars each year. To combat this chaos, Ethereum introduced the Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) architecture, which to some extent normalizes the MEV extraction process, but does not fundamentally return value to users.
However, a deeper transformation is brewing – Order Flow Auctions (OFA). This is not just a patch for the existing MEV supply chain, but a complete reshaping of the value chain. The core idea is highly disruptive: the user's order flow itself is a valuable asset that should not be exposed for free in the public mempool to be preyed upon, but should instead be auctioned through a dedicated market to return value to its creator – the user.

In the world of Web3, we have become accustomed to a 'transaction-centric' interaction model. Users need to manually sign a series of complex transactions to achieve a goal (for example, exchanging USDC for ETH and staking it on Lido): Approve USDC, Swap on Uniswap, Approve stETH, Stake on Lido. This process is not only cumbersome and extremely unfriendly to newcomers, but each step is fraught with potential risks, such as MEV attacks, slippage losses, and fluctuations in gas fees.
However, a profound architectural revolution is quietly taking place, known as 'Intent-Centric.' Its core idea is that users only need to express their ultimate 'intention' (I want to stake my USDC into Lido and get stETH), while outsourcing the complex process of 'how to achieve it' to a professional, decentralized 'solver' network.

Whenever I talk about @Linea.eth and where it fits in the expanding Layer-2 ecosystem, I always find myself looking at the bigger map of how Ethereum scaling has evolved. If you zoom out for a moment, the L2 world today feels like a rapidly growing galaxy optimistic rollups, zkEVMs, app-specific rollups, validiums, hybrid systems, and even #L3 experimentation. I think right in the middle of all this movement Linea has carved out a position that feels both technically mature and philosophically aligned with Ethereum’s long-term trajectory.

When I look at Linea the first thing that stands out is its deep commitment to EVM equivalence. Not compatible, not close enough, but genuinely equivalent at the opcode level. This matters more than most people realize. In the L2 landscape, every chain is trying to scale #Ethereum but not every chain does it by staying true to the Ethereum developer experience. Linea’s approach means I can deploy anything built for Ethereum without rewriting, refactoring, or redesigning it. That makes Linea feel like an extension of Ethereum rather than an alternative to it.

But Linea does not stop at equivalence it layers it with zero-knowledge technology. If optimistic rollups gave Ethereum a short-term boost, zkEVMs like Linea represent the long-term direction the ecosystem is moving toward. Faster finality, cryptographic correctness, and a more efficient data footprint these are the properties that make zk-based rollups feel like the “endgame” of scaling. And Linea is one of the networks actually delivering that vision rather than just theorizing about it.

In the broader L2 landscape, it’s clear that each chain has its own identity. #ARBİTRUM is known for flexibility. Optimism is pushing the superchain narrative. zkSync focuses on account abstraction. Starknet leans into Cairo for performance. But Linea’s identity feels distinct an Ethereum-aligned zkEVM designed for mass adoption, strong developer UX, and ecosystem stability. Whenever I explore projects deployed on Linea I see protocols drawn to that combination teams that want scale but without compromising on Ethereum’s core principles.

Another aspect of Linea’s role in the L2 world is the emphasis on accessibility. As builders, we often obsess over cryptography, proofs, gas optimizations, and sequencing but users care about affordability and ease. And Linea consistently delivers low fees and smooth transaction flow. Even during high-activity periods, the network manages to stay predictable. I have seen chains suffer under sudden demand spikes, but Linea has handled them gracefully, which says a lot about the robustness of its architecture.

This reliability plays a big role in attracting real builders. When developers feel confident that their DEX, lending market, NFT project, or gaming platform won’t crumble under load, they start building bolder ideas. And I have already seen Linea becoming a home for projects that want both technical depth and ecosystem consistency. It reminds me of the early days of L2 growth when people realized scaling wasn’t just about speed it was about creating an environment where innovation doesn’t hit roadblocks.

The other thing that fascinates me about Linea’s place in the L2 ecosystem is how it acts as a bridge between Ethereum’s established community and the emerging zk world. Ethereum has always valued decentralization, peer review, and open research. Linea mirrors that ethos through its open-source commitment, transparent engineering, and strong alignment with Ethereum’s rollup-centric roadmap. It does not try to reinvent the Ethereum culture it extends it into the scaling world.

When I think about competition in the L2 space, I actually see something different happening: specialization. Each L2 finds its niche, its philosophy, its technical flavor. And Linea’s niche feels deeply tied to developer familiarity + zk performance + long-term sustainability. It's not trying to create a walled garden or a proprietary ecosystem. Instead, it wants to be the place where builders feel at home immediately, while still benefiting from the next generation of rollup technology.

This balance becomes even more relevant as we enter an era of L2 interoperability and shared liquidity. The future won’t be about one L2 to rule them all it will be about many L2s connected through bridges, shared sequencing layers, and cross-chain protocols. In that world, Linea’s strong EVM alignment gives it a structural advantage. Anything that works on Ethereum works here. Anything that scales well on Ethereum scales better here. And that seamlessness means Linea can participate in a broader network of interconnected rollups rather than competing in isolation.

Looking at adoption patterns across L2s, one thing I have observed is that ecosystems grow fastest when developers feel comfortable. Linea’s documentation, tooling, and dev environment reduce friction in a way that makes experimentation easier. When a builder doesn’t have to fight the chain to get something deployed, creativity flourishes. And creativity drives adoption faster than any marketing campaign ever could.

Another thing that helps Linea stand out is how it approaches MEV dynamics, transaction ordering, and sequencing fairness but that’s a topic I covered in an earlier article. Still, in the context of the L2 landscape, it adds to the network’s reputation for predictability and user protection. A healthy #MEV environment is crucial for DeFi, and Linea’s design naturally encourages a more balanced extraction model compared to L1 mempool chaos.

One of the biggest differences I see is how Linea pushes forward without rushing decentralization. Many L2s promised decentralization early but struggled to deliver. Linea takes a more realistic, Ethereum-aligned path decentralize responsibly, step by step. And for a rollup, doing that publicly is important because it signals long-term reliability not hype.

Linea feels like a stabilizing force in the L2 world. Not the loudest, not the most aggressive, but one of the most consistent, technically grounded, and philosophically aligned. It’s the kind of chain that builders gravitate toward when they want both performance and predictability. It’s the kind of chain that users appreciate because things just work. It’s the kind of chain that will likely become a foundational pillar of the zkEVM category as the L2 landscape continues maturing.

When I think about the future, I do not imagine a fragmented L2 space fighting for dominance. I imagine an integrated environment where L2s each play their role. And Linea’s role feels increasingly clear a reliable, Ethereum-native zkEVM that anchors innovation while staying true to the values that built the blockchain ecosystem in the first place.

@Linea.eth
#Linea
$LINEA

$BNB Today, the official Twitter of BNB Chain posted a fun meme featuring CZ, igniting the speculative fire like a match in a quiet market. 🔥
In a short time, several meme coins with the same name were urgently created, with the earliest one skyrocketing in market value to $200,000. But this is not the retail investors' carnival; it's a carefully planned hunt by professional hunters. 🐺
On-chain monitoring shows that 22 mouse warehouse addresses were ambushed in this lightning battle, and another 314 wallets entered the market ahead of time through MEV bundled transactions. This is the harsh truth of the current market: large funds use technical weapons and information asymmetry to conduct dimensionality reduction strikes. You think you're seizing an opportunity, but in fact, you are already bait on someone else's chopping board.

📊 Technical picture
Let's take a look at the JTO chart — here we see that the indicators provide an interesting mix:
🔹 RSI is closer to the middle — neither speculators nor panic sellers are dominating yet
🔹 MACD shows a slight rise, but without sharp jumps
🔹 Moving averages maintain a positive trend, albeit at a slow pace 🚶‍♂️