Crypto Breaking

Brazil’s crypto tax policy is taking a back seat as the government focuses on an October 2026 presidential race, with officials delaying public consultation on crypto taxation until after the election cycle. Sources familiar with the matter told Reuters that regulators are hesitant to push divisive tax changes during an election year, though the topic remains on the radar for future consideration.

The policy environment in Brazil has already shifted markedly over the past year. In June 2025, Brazil ended its tax exemption for gains from smaller cryptocurrency sales or transfers, replacing it with a flat 17.5% capital gains tax that applies to profits from both onshore and offshore holdings, including self-custodied assets. The change marks a substantial tightening for retail investors who previously navigated a more lenient regime, and it set the stage for broader regulatory alignment of crypto activity with conventional tax rules.

In a separate development, Banco Central do Brasil unveiled rules in November 2025 that reframe stablecoin transfers as foreign currency exchanges, thereby bringing these transactions under the same tax framework as other FX movements. The government has also signaled potential proposals to tax cryptocurrencies used for international payments and is moving to align reporting obligations with the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), an international standard for monitoring crypto transactions.

Amid these regulatory shifts, Brazil’s crypto ecosystem has continued to expand. The country—home to more than 213 million people with a median age around 33.5 and a predominantly urban population—remains a leading crypto market in Latin America. Chainalysis data placed Brazil fifth globally in the 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index, and first within Latin America, underscoring the country’s rapid embrace of digital assets among both retail and institutional players. In 2025, Latin America’s crypto adoption grew by about 63%, a reflection of broader regional momentum that Brazil has helped to drive.

Beyond tax and oversight, the Brazilian payments landscape has been evolving as well. The Pix instant payment system, already widely used domestically, has begun expanding its footprint beyond Brazil’s borders, signaling a growing ecosystem that could influence cross-border crypto activity and policy considerations in the region.

Key takeaways

Brazil delays public consultation on crypto tax policy until after the 2026 presidential elections, with a potential slip into 2027, according to Reuters.

As of June 2025, Brazil imposes a 17.5% flat tax on crypto capital gains, replacing the prior exemption for smaller sales and transfers.

November 2025 rules from Banco Central treat stablecoin transfers as foreign currency exchanges, bringing them under existing tax laws.

CARF alignment is on the radar, as Brazil seeks to harmonize crypto reporting with the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework.

Brazil remains a standout crypto market in Latin America, ranking fifth globally in Chainalysis’s 2025 index and first in the region, with Latin America’s adoption rising 63% in 2025.

Adoption, policy, and the road ahead

Brazil’s regulatory posture illustrates a broader tension visible across many jurisdictions: balancing a thriving crypto economy with the need for clear, stable tax and reporting rules. The decision to pause a public consultation on crypto taxation reflects a strategic calculus that policymakers often make in the heat of electoral campaigns. Yet the substance of policy—tighter tax treatment of gains, stricter treatment of cross-border transfers, and stronger alignment with international reporting standards—appears to be moving forward in the background.

For investors, traders, and builders, the shift to a 17.5% flat tax on capital gains marks a more predictable tax environment for many participants, particularly those who previously benefited from exemptions or progressive rates. However, the removal of exemptions also raises the bar for compliance and reporting, especially for individuals with offshore or self-custodial positions. The ongoing alignment with CARF suggests greater transparency and standardized reporting, which could facilitate cross-border activity while increasing the regulatory burden for some market participants.

Brazil’s position as a regional crypto hub matters beyond national borders. The country’s adoption momentum—reflected in Chainalysis’s ranking and the growth trajectory across Latin America—gives policymakers a clear signal about the potential economic benefits of a well-regulated crypto sector. It also raises questions about how Brazilian rules will interact with regional standards and bilateral fintech partnerships, particularly as cross-border payments and stablecoin use gain ground.

On the technology and payments front, the Pix system’s expansion into Argentina hints at a broader cross-national digital payments narrative that could influence both consumer behavior and the regulatory dialogue around crypto. If these cross-border payments channels become more integrated with crypto rails, Brazil’s regulatory stance—whether it tightens further or onboards more participants—will likely influence neighboring markets and the regional stance on digital asset taxation and reporting.

As politicians and regulators weigh the next steps, market watchers should track two key developments: the outcome of the 2026 election and the timing of any post-election crypto tax consultations. Clarity on the latter will be essential for market participants planning tax optimization, compliance workflows, and product launches within Brazil’s rapidly evolving crypto landscape.

This article was originally published as Brazil Postpones Crypto Tax Policy Until After Election on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Bitcoin traded in a narrow range near $70,000 on Friday after a stumble to reclaim the $75,000 level earlier in the week. The back-to-back sessions of net outflows from U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs cooled a recent run of inflows, prompting traders to reassess whether institutions are turning more cautious in the face of a firmer inflation backdrop and renewed risk-off mood across markets.

Two days of net outflows, totaling about $254 million, were recorded in the ETF space, a magnitude not yet decisive enough to signal a wholesale shift in sentiment. Yet the move comes as macro headlines remain unhelpful to a rapid policy pivot from the Federal Reserve. Oil has remained stubbornly elevated, complicating inflation dynamics and, in turn, the Fed’s likely path for rate cuts. The broader risk-off tone was reinforced by a slide in equity markets and a softening of traditional hedges.

Key takeaways

Bitcoin persists near $70,000 amid two days of spot ETF outflows totaling $254 million, not yet confirming a bearish regime flip.

Options markets show elevated hedging: put options on Bitcoin are trading at roughly 2.5 times the premium of calls, with a 30-day delta skew around 16%—a sign of caution among professional traders.

Macro pressures loom large as oil remains above $94 per barrel, complicating growth expectations and potentially delaying further rate cuts, according to Oxford Economics.

The S&P 500 slid to its lowest level in six months, while gold fell about 10% over a multi-day stretch, underscoring a broad risk-off environment that weighs on Bitcoin beyond its own fundamentals.

Oil shock and the inflation problem

The price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude has held above $94 a barrel since March 12, marking a roughly 50% move higher from a month prior. Analysts argue that supply disruptions in the Middle East—alongside ongoing energy-market volatility—boost inflationary pressures and constrain the Federal Reserve’s ability to slash rates, at least in the near term. An Oxford Economics analysis highlighted how higher energy costs could dampen consumer spending and ripple through import-dependent manufacturing, potentially fueling tangible price pressures across the economy.

Market participants are watching for how energy dynamics intersect with Fed policy and equity risk appetite. The combination of higher fuel costs and geopolitical risk tends to steer investors toward hedging strategies and safer assets, even as Bitcoin’s own fundamentals may present a different risk profile for traders long on crypto exposure.

Bitcoin derivatives signal risk-off posture among professionals

Deribit data, as tracked by Laevitas, shows a notable tilt toward protective positioning among Bitcoin options traders. The put-to-call premium on Friday was nearly 2.5 times the premium for equivalent call options, signaling a pronounced demand for downside protection. This echoes previous episodes when macro shocks or geopolitical developments prompted a similar shift in the derivatives world.

To interpret whether this hedging translates into actual downside risk coverage, traders look at the delta skew—a measure of the relative pricing of puts versus calls. The 30-day delta skew stood at about 16% on Friday, implying professional participants were skeptical that the $69,000 to $70,000 area would prove sturdy in the near term. While not at the panic levels seen in past episodes, the figure reflects a market bracing for further volatility amid a 21% slide in Bitcoin’s price over the past three months, even as gold and U.S. equities displayed more resilience.

The price action also frames a broader question: can Bitcoin hold the line above $70,000 as macro uncertainty persists? A strong rally to $75,000 earlier in the week failed to translate into a sustained shift in the options market, suggesting a continued appetite among traders for risk mitigation rather than outright exposure.

Market observers note that a sustained, meaningful divergence between spot price performance and derivatives signals could offer clues about potential future moves. In this environment, the balance between macro risk and crypto-specific catalysts will likely determine whether hedging remains dominant or if risk appetite returns to Bitcoin’s price action.

For additional context on institutional sentiment during this period, readers can consider earlier coverage noting that larger players have not necessarily abandoned risk assets—even as they pursue strategies that hedge downside risk. Earlier coverage noted that institutions aren’t waiting for the bottom, indicating a nuanced approach rather than a wholesale retreat.

What the data imply for investors and builders

First, the two-day $254 million ETF outflow does not by itself signal a decisive shift in institutional stance. Yet it sits within a broader process where macro risk and energy volatility shape risk tolerance. Investors should watch whether outflows persist or subside in coming weeks, and how that interacts with the price regime Bitcoin can sustain above key levels such as $70,000.

Second, the elevated put-to-call premium and a positive delta skew imply sophisticated market participants are prioritizing downside protection. For traders, this could translate into more pronounced hedging around macro-sensitive milestones, such as inflation readings, central-bank guidance, or geopolitical headlines. For builders and developers, the data emphasize the importance of risk modeling that accounts for regime shifts in macro conditions and derivatives positioning, beyond simply tracking spot price snapshots.

Finally, the energy and geopolitical backdrop remains a potential source of ongoing volatility. With oil hovering at elevated levels and the risk of supply disruptions persisting, policy responses and financial conditions will continue to influence crypto markets. Readers should monitor oil-price trajectories, central-bank communications, and the evolving relationship between traditional markets and digital-asset liquidity flows as the year unfolds.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s performance remains juxtaposed against a broader macro landscape where stocks and precious metals are reacting to the same risk-off impulses that pressure crypto markets. The coming weeks will reveal whether Bitcoin can establish a firmer floor around the $70,000 mark or if further downside protection becomes increasingly essential for market participants.

As always, readers should stay tuned to macro developments, on-chain signals, and the evolving dynamics of investor appetite. The next move—whether risk assets regain footing or volatility remains elevated—will likely hinge on how inflation, energy prices, and geopolitical tensions unfold in the near term.

This article was originally published as Bitcoin Options Signal Fear Amid Subdued BTC ETF Outflows on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

米国の証券および商品監視機関は、デジタル資産の正式な分類法を初めて試みたガイダンスを共同で発表しました。市場の観察者は、ガルシア時代の姿勢からの重要な変化としてこの動きを歓迎し、ギャラクシーデジタルのアレックス・ソーンは、恒久的で法的拘束力のあるルールを与えることには至らないものの、実用的な規制に向けた一歩だと位置付けています。

今週発行されたSECのガイダンスは、デジタル資産のための5つのカテゴリーの枠組みを示しています：デジタル商品、NFTのようなデジタル収集品、デジタルツール、ステーブルコイン、およびトークン化された証券。この文書は、これらの資産が既存の法律の下でどのように位置づけられるか、また各カテゴリーがどこで規制の境界を引く可能性があるかを説明しています。ガイダンスに付随するファクトシートは、5つのバケツとそれらが機関のより広範な権限とどのように一致するかを強調し、リンクされた資料は、解釈が法律の適用を明確にすることを目的としていることを強調していますが、法律を書き換えることを目的としていないことを強調しています。

Ethereum’s native token, Ether (ETH), may push higher in the coming months as the market’s richest whale cohort returns to profitability for the first time since early February. Fresh on-chain signals point to a potential bottoming process that could set the stage for a renewed rally, though investors should remain mindful of historical caveats.

Key takeaways

The unrealized profit ratio of wallets holding more than 100,000 ETH has flipped back above zero, signaling that the largest holders are no longer sitting on aggregate losses.

Historically, a transition to profitability for this whale group has preceded notable uptrends: roughly 25% gains in about three months, around 50% in six months, and even larger moves over the following year.

If the pattern holds, ETH could target the $2,750 area by June and potentially exceed $3,200 by September, anchored by on-chain and chart signals aligning in a bullish configuration.

Glassnode’s MVRV-based valuation bands suggest upside potential but outline key thresholds: reclaiming the realized price near $2,353 would open a path toward the -0.5 sigma band around $2,640; failing to reclaim could leave ETH vulnerable to further downside toward $1,651.

Technical factors reinforce the bull case: ETH recently cleared an ascending triangle, with a retest of the breakout level as support, a setup that commonly precedes further upside if the trendline holds.

Whale profitability as a potential catalyst

CryptoQuant’s data on the 100,000 ETH-plus wallet cohort shows the unrealized profit ratio returning to positive territory. In practical terms, this means the largest holders are no longer in a net loss position on their outstanding, largely illiquid exposure. An on-chain analyst known as CW noted that such shifts have historically marked the onset of sustained upside moves, providing a support-for-optimism signal for the broader market.

From a historical perspective, a positive flip in this whale ratio has correlated with meaningful appreciation in ETH’s price: approximately 25% gains over roughly three months, about 50% over six months, and even larger moves within a year. While not a guaranteed predictor, the pattern underscores a common market dynamic: when big owners stop bleeding on paper losses, selling pressure can ease and conviction among the largest holders can re-emerge.

That dynamic matters because ETH’s price action often hinges on how much the whale cohort wants to realize profits and how quickly the broader market absorbs their moves. A fresh wave of on-chain confidence could feed into a broader narrative of accumulation among the richest ETH holders, potentially reinforcing a self-fulfilling rally.

Valuation signals align with a recovery path

Another supportive lens comes from on-chain valuation bands tracked by Glassnode. The data shows ETH rebounding from a low MVRV deviation, with similarities to prior cycles in Q2 2022 and what we observed in 2025. The current setup suggests ETH would need to reclaim its realized price—approximately $2,353—to unlock further upside toward the -0.5 sigma pricing band near $2,640.

Conversely, failing to reclaim the realized price keeps ETH exposed to downside risk, with the next meaningful support near the lowest deviation band around $1,651. In practical terms, the realized price is acting as a critical fulcrum: a successful reclaim would bolster the bullish thesis, while failure to recapture could invite renewed pressure to test deeper supports.

Technical picture: what the chart is signaling

On the price chart, ETH appears to have broken out of an ascending triangle, a textbook breakout signal. The next phase often involves a retest of the breakout level, where the market checks whether the former resistance has truly flipped into support. If this retest holds, the path toward the measured upside target near $2,625–$2,750 becomes more plausible, with a broader alignment to the on-chain recovery framework described above.

That target sits comfortably within the envelope of the on-chain recovery range highlighted by MVRV analysis, providing an additional layer of confluence for a bullish setup. However, a failed retest could undermine the breakout and re-open downside risk toward the lower support zone around $1,950–$2,000.

What this means for traders and holders

For traders, the convergence of on-chain profitability signals and a constructive chart pattern offers a clearer directional read than in weeks past. The combination of a profitability flip among the 100k+ ETH whale cohort and a successful breakout retest reduces near-term selling pressure from some of the market’s deepest liquidity pockets, potentially enabling a smoother climb higher if macro conditions stay supportive.

For long-term holders, the narrative centers on a potential re-accumulation phase among the wealthiest ETH wallets and a gradual re-anchoring above realized price levels. This alignment can bolster confidence in ETH’s resilience during broader crypto cycles, especially if macro risk sentiment improves or if fundamental rails such as network activity and developer engagement continue to strengthen.

Historical context and what remains uncertain

It’s important to temper optimism with caution. The 2018 era offers a reminder that a similar flip in profitability among large holders does not guarantee a sustained uptrend. In that period, ETH experienced a notable downside following the signal before eventually stabilizing and resuming its long-term ascent. As with any on-chain narrative, outcomes depend on a confluence of factors, including macro conditions, regulatory developments, and competing liquidity dynamics in DeFi and institutional markets.

Looking ahead, key milestones to watch include a decisive reclaim of the realized price, a sustained hold of the breakout level on retests, and how quickly the market digests the next round of on-chain data from sources like CryptoQuant and Glassnode. If the current signal persists and macro backdrop remains supportive, a test of the $2,750 region by mid-year and a challenge of $3,200 later in the year could be within reach.

This article does not constitute investment advice. Market conditions are subject to change, and investors should perform their own due diligence before acting on any on-chain or technical signals.

What happens next will hinge on how decisively ETH can defend the breakout and whether the largest holders maintain their renewed profitability. As the ecosystem evolves, traders and hodlers alike should keep a close watch on realized-price dynamics, MVRV deviations, and the evolving behavior of the 100k+ ETH cohort to gauge the durability of any emerging uptrend.

This article was originally published as Ethereum poised for 25% rally as top ETH whales return to profitability on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

A 66-year-old Hong Kong retiree became the latest victim in a sequence of crypto investment scams that operated through WhatsApp outreach by self-styled “virtual currency experts.” Police say the scam drained about HKD 6.6 million, roughly USD 840,000, over a six-month period. The CyberDefender unit of the Hong Kong Police disclosed the case in a March 20 post on its Facebook page, illustrating how fraudsters recycle the same victim through successive schemes that promise guaranteed profits and later offer recovery services for a fee.

The chronology, as outlined by CyberDefender HK, began in September 2025 when an unknown scammer messaged the retiree claiming to be a virtual currency investment expert and promising steady gains if the victim followed his instructions. The victim transferred USD 180,000 and deposited cryptocurrency into a wallet controlled by the scammer, who subsequently disappeared, prompting a police report.

The case then spiraled into a second round of deceit. Unable to accept the loss, the retiree sought help online from another so-called crypto expert who claimed he could recover the missing funds but demanded a security deposit of USD 75,000. After paying, that second scammer vanished as well.

In January, a third purported specialist contacted the victim via WhatsApp, offering to reclaim both prior losses if the retiree bought USD 585,000 worth of cryptocurrency and sent it to a specified address. Once the transfer was completed, the scammer disappeared, bringing total losses to about USD 840,000 across roughly six months.

The CyberDefender team cautioned that genuine professionals do not reach out randomly, and that the phrases “guaranteed returns” or “inside information” are classic red flags. As the unit put it, “Life has no take two; but scams can have take three.”

Related: How US investigators traced $61M in crypto tied to romance scams across wallets

Key takeaways

The victim’s losses followed a clear pattern: an initial guaranteed-profit pitch, followed by a recovery-for-fee pitch, and a final attempt to recoup through another “expert.”

Three different scammers reportedly targeted the same retiree, illustrating how con artists exploit a single victim through successive, increasingly aggressive schemes.

The case sits amid a broader surge in web3 crime, with industry data pointing to multi‑billion-dollar losses tied to phishing, social engineering, and investment fraud.

Regulators and security firms have warned repeatedly about impersonation, fake tokens, and recovery scams, urging caution against unsolicited outreach and guaranteed-return promises.

Practical steps for users include verifying identities through official channels, avoiding unknown wallets, and resisting requests for large, upfront payments or security deposits.

Context: escalating Web3 fraud and the regulatory backdrop

The Hong Kong case arrives as crypto-related crime continues to rise globally. Security firm Hacken has flagged substantial damage in 2025, estimating Web3 losses at about USD 3.95 billion, driven in part by state-linked actors and weak key security across wallets and platforms. The trend underscores the ongoing risk of phishing, social engineering, and investment fraud that can follow a single high‑profile scam.

Authorities around the world have been vocal about new waves of crypto fraud. From phishing schemes to fake tokens and misrepresented investment opportunities, official warnings have become a regular feature of coverage in the crypto security space. For example, coverage linked to the FBI’s warnings about phishing and token scams, as well as investigations into high-profile frauds such as India’s GainBitcoin probe and actions targeting illicit USDT movements, highlights a continued focus on enforcement and forensics as the sector matures.

As the industry grapples with these threats, observers say the most persistent danger remains social engineering—convincing, personalized outreach that exploits trust. The Hong Kong incident reinforces the lesson that scammers often masquerade as credible professionals, using familiar crypto jargon to exploit the hopeful impulse of investors seeking quick, guaranteed gains.

For readers tracking the broader market risk, the message is clear: even as legitimate projects advance and institutional participation grows, ordinary users remain highly exposed to targeted scams conducted through seemingly private channels like WhatsApp and other messaging apps. Keeping a skeptical eye on unsolicited advice, verifying credentials through official company channels, and avoiding rapid transfers to unknown wallets are foundational steps to reduce exposure to these increasingly sophisticated schemes.

Looking ahead, regulators and industry researchers will likely intensify warnings and enforcement related to crypto investment outreach, with a continued emphasis on transparency around the identities of “experts” and the provenance of promised returns. Market watchers should monitor whether more cases like the Hong Kong incident lead to enhanced user education campaigns, stricter messaging guidelines for crypto service providers, and new multi‑party verification practices to curb recovery scams.

Readers should watch for updated guidance from local law enforcement and security firms as they refine best practices for detecting and preventing social-engineering fraud in crypto, as well as for any official statements about new actions against impersonators and bogus recovery services. The evolving landscape suggests that ongoing vigilance—paired with practical safeguards—will remain essential for anyone engaging with crypto investment opportunities, particularly through unregulated channels.

What remains uncertain is how quickly audiences will adopt more robust due-diligence habits when confronted with personalized outreach promising easy gains. As this case illustrates, a moment of trust can quickly turn into a six-figure loss, and the path to recovery can become a perilous new scam in disguise.

This article was originally published as Hong Kong retiree loses $840K to trio of crypto-expert scammers on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Bitcoin’s mining difficulty shifted lower once more, declining by about 7.7% in the latest retarget to 133.79 trillion at block 941,472, according to CoinWarz data. The move follows a mid-March dip that pulled the metric from roughly 148 trillion to the current level, marking the sharpest drop since February. A lower difficulty means less computational work is required to mine a given block, effectively boosting revenue per unit of hash power for operators that keep running.

The adjustment came on the heels of slower-than-target block production over the previous 2,016 blocks. CloverPool’s explorer data show average block times near 12 minutes 36 seconds—well above Bitcoin’s 10-minute target—prompting the protocol to recalibrate downward to maintain steady issuance.

February’s landscape also featured a notable disruption: weather-related outages in the United States temporarily knocked several large mining facilities offline, triggering a sharp drop in difficulty. As power conditions normalized and hashrate returned, the metric rebounded by roughly 15% in subsequent weeks, underscoring the sensitivity of the network to regional outages and the geographic concentration of mining capacity.

Bitcoin’s difficulty metric measures how hard it is to find a valid hash for the next block. It auto-adjusts to keep block production close to one every 10 minutes; rising hashpower pushes difficulty higher to prevent blocks from being mined too quickly, while a retreat in hashrate lowers the target to preserve issuance cadence.

Bitcoin difficulty drops 7.7%. Source: CoinWarz

Related: Cango reports $285M Q4 loss as Bitcoin mining costs surge in 2025

The market consensus around the near-term difficulty path remains conditional on how quickly the next 10-minute cadence can resume as hashrate shifts with weather, power prices and utilization of mining hardware across regions. The next difficulty adjustment is currently projected for April 3, subject to block-by-block changes.

Key takeaways

March 20 adjustment: Bitcoin mining difficulty fell about 7.7% to 133.79 trillion at block 941,472, marking the steepest drop since February and reflecting a softer recent hash rate.

Block-time pressure: Average block times around 12 minutes 36 seconds, well above the 10-minute target, catalyzed the downward recalibration to keep issuance stable.

Weather-driven volatility: February’s drop followed US weather disruptions that temporarily sidelined major facilities, with a roughly 15% rebound as power conditions normalized.

Strategic shifts among miners: In response to tighter margins and power costs, several operators are moving toward AI and high-performance computing workloads to diversify revenue streams beyond pure BTC mining.

Miner strategy shifts in a power-cost environment

The latest difficulty reset arrives at a moment when a subset of publicly listed miners is broadening its focus beyond traditional Bitcoin mining. Industry observers note that AI workloads and HPC infrastructure offer a potential counterbalance to volatile crypto earnings, leveraging existing data-center footprints and power networks to monetize idle capacity without relying exclusively on block rewards.

Among the players cited in market discourse, Core Scientific, Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA), Hut 8, and Cipher Mining have steered capacity toward AI-oriented deployments or high-performance computing. The trend aligns with a broader re-evaluation of capital expenditure and capacity utilization as power prices squeeze margins and competition for electricity intensifies between compute-intensive sectors.

Additionally, Bitdeer has moved to shrink its treasury exposure. The company disclosed it liquidated 943 BTC from reserves in February and, in its latest weekly update on March 21, confirmed that its BTC holdings remained at zero. Such treasury management moves highlight a broader investor question: how miners balance balance sheets against cyclical earnings and shifting demand for computing power.

Proponents of the AI pivot argue that the overlap between data-center capacity and AI workloads offers a path to steadier returns in environments where BTC mining margins can swing with electricity costs and network difficulty. Critics contend that AI demand may also be volatile and energy-intensive, potentially creating its own cycle of capacity constraints and price pressures.

Industry commentary has also touched on resilience questions for Bitcoin itself. Some observers have framed AI as the newest competing demand for electricity, even as proponents stress the enduring value of Bitcoin’s decentralized security model. The debate underscores a broader strategic tension facing miners: diversify beyond a single revenue line or double down on core hash-power economics during periods of elevated energy costs.

Looking ahead, investors and operators will watch how the next rounds of capacity expansion, power pricing, and regulatory developments influence both the profitability of existing mines and the viability of AI-centric data-center deployments. The ongoing swing in hashrate and difficulty will continue to interact with these strategic choices, shaping the industry’s trajectory through the rest of the year.

As the network navigates these crosscurrents, the immediate question for market participants is what the April 3 adjustment will reveal about the balance of supply and demand in the global mining ecosystem. For readers tracking risk and opportunity, the evolving demand backdrop for AI workloads, the pace of capacity reallocation, and potential regulatory developments in key mining hubs remain critical to watch in the near term.

Readers should stay tuned for the forthcoming data on next-block production and power-market dynamics, which will cast further light on whether miners can sustain growth amid rising energy costs and a shifting compute landscape.

This article was originally published as Bitcoin mining difficulty dips 7.7% as miners endure pressure on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

@pEthicsのオンチェーン蓄積とマクロ信号が収束している中、かつての著名なEthereumウォレットが注目の買い手として再浮上しています。Arkham Intelligenceによると、長年のアドレスthomasg.ethは静かにETHの足跡を再構築しており、過去1週間でスポット保有、ラップドETH、Aaveに預けられたETHを通じて約1950万ドルのEtherを追加しました。3月20日には新たに300万ドルの購入が記録されました。この活動は、最後の過去最高値から大きく離れた価格レベルで蓄積する意欲の再燃を示しています。

BlackRock has moved a fresh batch of Bitcoin and Ethereum to Coinbase Prime, totaling over $140 million in value. The transfers follow recent ETF outflows and weaker price momentum across major crypto assets. The activity adds pressure to a market that has already shown signs of slowing institutional demand.

Bitcoin Transfers Reflect ETF Pressure

BlackRock transferred 544 Bitcoin to Coinbase Prime as ETF outflows increased across the sector. The transaction aligns with recent declines in ETF inflows and softer price action. Additionally, Bitcoin has struggled to maintain upward momentum after its recent rally.

BlackRock just deposited 47,728 $ETH($102.13M) and 544 $BTC($38.3M) to Coinbase Prime.https://t.co/qmuDIrPHc6 pic.twitter.com/kmqXk3XzEx

— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) March 20, 2026

Data shows that the transferred Bitcoin is worth about $38.3 million at current market prices. The movement links directly to wallets associated with BlackRock’s IBIT Bitcoin ETF. Consequently, the transfer suggests a response to redemption activity within the fund.

Bitcoin ETFs recorded continued outflows over two consecutive sessions, with total withdrawals exceeding $90 million. This trend follows a period of strong inflows earlier in the quarter. However, the current slowdown reflects reduced demand at higher price levels.

Ethereum Movement Signals Liquidity Shift

BlackRock also transferred 47,728 Ethereum tokens to Coinbase Prime during the same transaction window. The Ethereum portion accounted for approximately $102.13 million of the total transfer. Moreover, the scale of the movement highlights significant liquidity repositioning.

The transferred Ethereum originates from wallets tied to BlackRock’s ETHA Ethereum ETF. This connection indicates that ETF-related flows continue to influence on-chain activity. Hence, the movement may reflect adjustments to meet redemption or trading requirements.

Ethereum has faced uneven performance despite broader market recovery attempts in recent weeks. Price action remains sensitive to both ETF flows and macro sentiment. Additionally, large transfers often increase short-term volatility expectations in the market.

Market Context and Institutional Positioning

BlackRock continues to dominate both Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF markets despite recent outflows. The firm relies on Coinbase Prime for custody and execution of its crypto transactions. Therefore, transfers to the platform often signal preparation for trading activity.

Market participants interpret the latest deposits in different ways, depending on broader sentiment. Some view the transfers as preparation for asset sales following ETF withdrawals. However, others consider the possibility of liquidity setup for future positioning.

The broader crypto market has shown reduced momentum as Bitcoin trades near the $70,000 level. This price range has acted as a resistance zone after the recent rally phase. Consequently, large institutional flows now play a more visible role in shaping direction.

This article was originally published as BlackRock Moves $140M in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF Flows Turn Negative on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

暗号市場は今日回復し、ビットコインは最近の損失の後、$71,000を再び超えました。より広い市場の時価総額は$2.42兆に上昇し、デリバティブの活動に支えられています。しかし、マクロの圧力と弱いセンチメントは短期的な方向性を形成し続けています。

重要なハイライト

ビットコインは主要なオプションの期限切れが勢いを高めた後、$71Kに反発します

イーサリアムは短期的な機関投資家の支援にもかかわらず、$2.1K近くで苦戦しています

XRPは小売需要が弱い機関投資家のフローを相殺する中で堅調を維持しています

暗号市場の時価総額は不安定なマクロの背景の中で$2.42Tに上昇しています

RLUSD供給調整とトレジャリー活動

Rippleは最新のバーンをトレジャリウォレットを通じて実行し、900万RLUSDトークンを流通から永久に削除しました。これにより、利用可能な供給量が減少し、同月の以前の大規模なバーンに続くものでした。この行動は、償還と流動性バランスに関連するルーチン供給管理の一部です。

3月初めに、Rippleは同様のトレジャリー操作を通じてEthereumブロックチェーン上で2500万RLUSDを削除しました。さらに、同社はこの最新の調整の前にXRPレジャーで別の1000万トークンのバーンを実施しました。これらの連続的な削減は、複数のブロックチェーンネットワーク全体の流通供給に対する積極的な監視を示しています。

デジタル資産に対する機関投資家の需要は、市場が継続的な混乱を経験しているにもかかわらず、堅調に保たれています。新しいデータは、大口投資家が10月以降の急激な売却にもかかわらず、配分を増やす準備をしていることを示しており、機関が暗号通貨を短期取引ではなく、多様化された規制されたポートフォリオの一部として見ていることを示しています。同時に、ステーブルコインは取引所を超えて規制された金融チャネルに足場を広げており、日本は規制されたUSDC貸出商品やデジタル資産を実世界の資産に結びつける新しいモデルを進めています。一方で、伝統的な資本市場は暗号企業のための場としてますます重要になっており、AbraはSPAC合併を通じてNasdaq上場計画を追求しています。これらの発展を総合すると、ボラティリティや政策の問題が残る中でも、規制されたコンプライアンスの道を通じて成熟し続ける暗号市場を示唆しています。

ビットコインは週の初めに好調なスタートを切りましたが、広範なリスクオフのムードが市場全体に広がる中で急速に利益を削減しました。主要な暗号通貨は約5%下落し、S&P 500、ダウ・ジョーンズ、ナスダック、金が下落する一方で、原油は約7.3%急騰し、中東の紛争が2月28日にエスカレートして以来、約53%上昇したままです。この動きの規模は、トレーダーが地政学的に緊張した環境でリスクを再評価する中で、協調的な資本の再配分を示唆しています。

アナリストは、この動きを流動性、インフレーションのダイナミクス、ヘッドラインリスクが相互に作用するより広いサイクルの一部として捉えています。地域で進行中の紛争に結びついた進化する背景は、トレーダーが伝統的な資産と暗号関連の金融商品を問わず、エクスポージャーを再調整する要因となっています。

Gold slid 3.5% on Friday, trading around $4,488 per ounce, as geopolitical volatility and uncertainty in the Middle East weighed on sentiment. The decline pushed the metal’s weekly drop to about 11%, the steepest weekly decline since 1983, underscoring how a risk-off environment can erode the appeal of traditional safe-havens when energy and geopolitical risks dominate markets.

From late February, when US and allied actions in the region intensified, gold has fallen more than 15%, erasing a portion of a rapid rally that had lifted prices toward the $5,500 mark in late January. TradingView data highlighted that March 16–20 marked gold’s worst-performing week since 1983, underscoring how quickly the narrative can shift in times of geopolitical strain. TradingView noted the week’s move as historically significant for the yellow metal.

Analysts say the conflict is disrupting global energy flows, particularly through the Strait of Hormuz, feeding fears of a prolonged energy crisis as markets weigh the balance between safe-haven demand and the impact of higher energy costs on inflation and growth. In such an environment, investors are furling into risk-off assets while considering how energy-market dynamics might influence central-bank policy in the near term.

Amid the regional tensions, US President Donald Trump said he was weighing a winding-down of some Middle East military efforts. While talk of reducing troop deployments emerged, the United States has continued to bolster its regional presence, and airstrikes in the area persisted. The evolving stance adds another layer of uncertainty for traders trying to gauge the risk premium priced into gold and other assets.

Market watchers are also focusing on the Federal Reserve’s policy outlook. The broader expectation remains that the Fed will hold interest rates steady for the year, which could keep fixed-income yields attractive relative to gold in the near term. In a related note, Fed Chair Jerome Powell signaled that higher energy prices could push inflation higher in the near term, complicating the inflation trajectory and potentially influencing the demand for both gold and crypto assets as hedges or diversifiers.

Bitcoin finds footing as gold wobbles

Over the past year, gold has outperformed many traditional assets, rising roughly 48.5% while the broader crypto market has retraced about 16.5% in the same period. In the current environment, Bitcoin has shown a degree of resilience, trading near $70,000 and having risen more than 11% since the initial Iran-related attacks. The latest move reflects a common pattern where crypto markets react to geopolitical shocks differently than traditional safe-havens, sometimes offering a counterbalance to gold’s shifts.

Bitcoin’s relative performance this month has been notable. While gold has faced renewed pressure from the energy and geopolitical backdrop, BTC’s pullback earlier this year has shifted into a recovery phase, with the digital asset reclaiming some ground as investors evaluate risk, liquidity, and the potential for institutional and retail adoption to influence price trajectories. The dynamics illustrate a broader theme in crypto markets: while gold’s role as a hedge remains debated in times of energy-market stress, Bitcoin can exhibit outsized sensitivity to policy signals, global risk appetite, and liquidity conditions.

That said, the longer-term relationship between gold and crypto remains nuanced. The twelve-month lens shows gold’s robust rally vs. a broader crypto retracement, highlighting ongoing debates about which assets best weather macro shocks and how central-bank policy, energy volatility, and geopolitical risks reweight those choices for investors, traders, and builders in the crypto ecosystem.

What this means for markets and readers

The current environment underscores a few persistent themes for crypto markets and traditional assets alike. First, geopolitical risk can simultaneously depress traditional safe havens like gold and alter risk sentiment in crypto, where Bitcoin and other digital assets may trade as high-beta instruments in the short term. Second, energy-price dynamics and central-bank policy expectations are closely linked; if energy costs push inflation higher longer than anticipated, monetary policy paths may shift, affecting both gold’s appeal and crypto liquidity environments. Lastly, as the Strait of Hormuz and related chokepoints remain in focus, traders will continue to monitor oil-flow disruptions and their implications for global growth and asset correlations.

Investors should watch how central banks respond to evolving energy and inflation signals in the coming weeks, alongside any escalation or de-escalation in regional tensions. Crypto traders may look for catalysts in liquidity shifts, exchange flows, and macro scenarios that could widen the divergence between traditional safe-havens and digital-asset assets.

Looking ahead, the market will be attentive to any developments that could alter the risk calculus: a clear shift in Middle East policy, updates from the Fed on rate guidance, and how energy markets respond to supply-and-demand dynamics. In these conditions, gold and Bitcoin continue to offer distinct narratives about hedging, risk-taking, and the evolving role of crypto in a macro-driven market backdrop.

Readers should stay tuned for updates on geopolitical developments, central-bank communications, and energy-market signals, as they will shape the relative performance of gold, Bitcoin, and the broader crypto landscape in the near term.

This article was originally published as Crypto markets edge higher as gold sinks 43-year drop amid Iran war on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

ビットコインは、$76,000の上での反発を維持できなかった後、動きの変化に取り組んでおり、原油価格が上昇し、インフレの懸念がリスク市場を揺さぶる中で$70,000以下に滑り込んでいます。この動きは、マクロの力—石油、政策の期待、株式の弱さ—がクリプトの物語を形成し続けていることを強調しており、トレーダーは今後の進むべき道についての手がかりを探しながらチャートパターンを解析しています。

最も注目されているシグナルの一つは、マーケットテクニシャンがさらなる下落を告げる可能性があると述べる潜在的なベアウィッジです。アナリストは、BTCが新たな基盤を築いているのか、再び下落する段階に入っているのかを評価しており、ブレイクダウンがあった場合の主要なターゲットは$50,000台から$60,000台の範囲に流通しています。

米国の法律制定者とホワイトハウスは、ステーブルコインの利回りが今後の暗号市場構造フレームワークにどのように適合するかについて政治的合意に向かっているようで、2025年のデジタル資産市場明確化法（一般にCLARITY法として知られる）の勢いを復活させる可能性があります。Politicoは、共和党のセネター・トム・ティリスと民主党のセネター・アンジェラ・アルソブルックスの間で「原則的合意」が達成されたと報じており、停滞している法案に向けた潜在的な前進の道を示しています。

Google Threat Intelligence has flagged a new crypto-stealing malware named “Ghostblade” targeting Apple iOS devices. Described as part of the DarkSword family of browser-based tools, Ghostblade is engineered to siphon private keys and other sensitive data in a rapid, discreet burst rather than a continuous, always-on presence on the device.

Written in JavaScript, Ghostblade activates, harvests data from the compromised device, and relays it to malicious servers before shutting down. Researchers note that the malware’s design makes it harder to detect, as it does not require additional plugins and ceases operation once data extraction completes. Google’s threat intelligence team highlights that Ghostblade also takes steps to avoid detection by deleting crash reports that would otherwise alert Apple’s telemetry systems.

Beyond private keys, the malware is capable of accessing and transmitting messaging data from iMessage, Telegram, and WhatsApp. It can also harvest SIM card information, user identity details, multimedia files, geolocation data, and access various system settings. The broader DarkSword framework, which Ghostblade belongs to, is cited by Google as part of an evolving set of threats illustrating how attackers continually refine their toolkit to target crypto users.

For readers who track threat trends, Ghostblade sits alongside other components of the DarkSword iOS exploit chain described by Google Threat Intelligence. The set of tools is observed within a wider context of crypto-threat evolution, including reports on iOS-based exploit kits used in crypto phishing campaigns.

Key takeaways

Ghostblade represents a JavaScript-based crypto-stealing threat on iOS, delivered as part of the DarkSword ecosystem and designed for fast data exfiltration.

The malware operates briefly and non-continuously, reducing the likelihood of long-term device footholds and complicating detection.

It can relay sensitive data from iMessage, Telegram, and WhatsApp, and can access SIM information, identity data, multimedia, geolocation, and system settings, while also erasing crash reports to evade discovery.

The development aligns with a broader shift in the threat landscape toward social-engineering and data-extraction tactics that exploit human behavior, not just software vulnerabilities.

February’s crypto-hacking losses dropped sharply to $49 million from $385 million in January, signaling a pivot from code-based intrusions to phishing and wallet-poisoning techniques, according to Nominis.

Ghostblade and the DarkSword ecosystem: what’s known

Google’s researchers describe Ghostblade as a component of the DarkSword family—a suite of browser-based malware tools that target crypto users by stealing private keys and related data. Ghostblade’s JavaScript core allows rapid interaction with the device while remaining lightweight and transient. This design choice is consistent with other recent on-device threats that favor quick data exfiltration cycles over prolonged infections.

In practice, the malware’s capabilities extend beyond mere key theft. By accessing messaging apps such as iMessage, Telegram, and WhatsApp, attackers can intercept conversations, credentials, and potentially sensitive attachments. The inclusion of SIM card information and geolocation access broadens the potential attack surface, enabling more comprehensive identity theft and fraud scenarios. Crucially, the malware’s ability to wipe crash reporting further obscures activity, complicating post-infection forensics for both victims and defenders.

As part of the broader DarkSword discourse, Ghostblade underscores the ongoing arms race in on-device threat intelligence. Google Threat Intelligence has framed DarkSword as one of the latest examples illustrating how malicious actors continue to refine iOS-focused attack chains, exploiting the strong trust users place in their devices and the apps they rely on for daily communication and finance.

From code-centric intrusions to human-factor exploits

The February 2026 crypto-hacking landscape reflects a marked shift in attacker behavior. According to Nominis, total losses from crypto hacks fell to $49 million in February, a steep drop from $385 million in January. The firm attributes the decline to a pivot away from purely code-based threats toward schemes that leverage human error, including phishing attempts, wallet poisoning attacks, and other social-engineering vectors that lead users to unwittingly reveal keys or credentials.

Phishing remains a central tactic. Attackers deploy fake websites designed to resemble legitimate platforms, often with URLs that mimic real sites to lure users into entering private keys, seed phrases, or wallet passwords. When users interact with these lookalike interfaces—whether by logging in, approving transactions, or pasting sensitive data—the attackers gain direct access to funds and credentials. This shift toward human-targeted exploits has implications for how exchanges, wallets, and users must defend themselves, emphasizing user education alongside technical safeguards.

The February data point aligns with a broader industry narrative: while code-level exploits and zero-days continue to mature, a growing share of the risk to crypto holdings comes from social-engineering exploits that exploit well-established human behaviors—trust, urgency, and the habitual use of familiar interfaces. For industry observers, the takeaway is not only about patching software vulnerabilities but also about hardening the human element of security through education, more robust authentication, and safer onboarding experiences for wallet users.

Implications for users, wallets, and builders

Ghostblade’s emergence—and the accompanying trend toward human-centered attacks—highlights several practical takeaways for users and developers alike. First, device hygiene remains critical. Keeping iOS up to date, applying app and browser hardening measures, and employing hardware wallets or secure enclaves for private keys can raise the bar against rapid exfiltration attacks.

Second, users should exercise heightened caution with messaging apps and web surfaces. The convergence of on-device data access with phishing-style deception means that even seemingly benign interactions—opening a link, approving a permission, or pasting a seed phrase—can become a gateway for theft. Multi-factor authentication, authentication apps, and biometric protections can help reduce risk, but education and skepticism about unexpected prompts are equally vital.

For builders, the Ghostblade case emphasizes the importance of anti-phishing controls, secure key management flows, and transparent user warnings around sensitive operations. It also reinforces the value of continuous threat intelligence sharing—especially around on-device threats that blend browser-based tools with mobile operating system features. Cross-industry collaboration remains essential to detect novel exploitation chains before they become widely effective.

What to watch next

As Google Threat Intelligence and other researchers continue to track DarkSword-linked activity, observers should monitor updates on iOS exploit chains and the emergence of similarly stealthy, short-duration malware. The February shift toward human-factor vulnerabilities suggests a future where defenders must bolster both technical safeguards and user-facing education to reduce exposure to phishing and wallet-poisoning schemes. For readers, the next milestones include any formal threat intel advisories on iOS crypto threats, new detections from security vendors, and how major platforms adapt their anti-phishing and fraud-prevention measures in response to these evolving playbooks.

In the meantime, keeping a watchful eye on threat intelligence backstops—such as Google Threat Intelligence’s reporting on DarkSword and related iOS exploits, along with ongoing analyses from Nominis and other blockchain security researchers—will be essential for assessing risk and refining defenses against crypto-focused cybercrime.

This article was originally published as Google Threat Intel Flags Ghostblade as Crypto-Stealing Malware on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Traders are underestimating how deeply the current conflict in the Middle East could reshape the macro backdrop, with some positioning around a so‑called “TACO trade”—short for “Trump always chickens out”—dominating chatter in crypto and broader markets. Nic Puckrin, founder of Coin Bureau, popularized the term to describe a supposed tendency for U.S. leadership to back away from geopolitical flare‑ups. But he cautions that the situation is far more intricate than a single decision by any one leader, and there are no quick exits from a widening conflict.

Oil prices have become a central barometer for the scenario. If crude stays above $100 per barrel, growth in the United States could slow while Personal Consumption Expenditures inflation rises, potentially by as much as one percentage point, according to Puckrin. That dynamic would complicate the Federal Reserve’s already delicate task of steering policy in an environment where inflation remains persistent and growth is uncertain. The risk of stagflation—the painful combination of rising prices with weak growth and employment—emerges as a real possibility if energy costs stay elevated through the second and third quarters.

Key takeaways

Oil could stay a decisive driver: Sustained prices above $100 per barrel threaten growth and lift inflation in tandem, increasing stagflation risk.

The TACO trade is not a guaranteed play: While the term captures a belief in limited appetite for geopolitical escalation, experts warn that policymakers and markets should expect a more complex, drawn‑out conflict with no easy exit.

Strait of Hormuz disruption compounds the risk: Prolonged disruption through the vital chokepoint raises the energy price floor and feeds into broader inflation dynamics.

Policy path remains uncertain: The Fed held rates at 3.5%–3.75%, with market odds of a near‑term cut fading and a non‑zero probability (about 12%) of a rate increase at the next meeting.

Crypto and risk assets face a nuanced outlook: Higher energy costs and uncertain monetary policy can dampen liquidity for risk assets, even as some traders seek hedges or tactical exposure.

Oil shocks, chokepoints, and the market’s fragile balance

The incoming energy data and geopolitical risk have pushed crude higher in recent sessions, with WTI briefly touching the high‑end of the $110s and flirting with $120 per barrel as the conflict widened. The persistent tension around the Middle East has intensified concerns that global supply flows could be constrained if oil infrastructure faces sustained disruption. Market observers point to the Strait of Hormuz as a pivotal artery—through which a sizable portion of the world’s oil shipments pass—and note that any sustained closure or damage could push prices higher for an extended period.

Analysts emphasize that even a reopening of maritime routes would not instantly restore pre‑crisis conditions. “Disruption to the Gulf’s oil-producing infrastructure will take months to rebuild,” one commentator noted, underscoring the slow‑burn impact on prices and the broader economy. The energy price surge feeds through to a wide array of goods and services, often lifting inflation broadly rather than affecting a single sector in isolation. In such a regime, inflationary pressures can push the real cost of living higher while limiting the central bank’s ability to loosen financial conditions quickly.

Beyond the immediate supply shock, energy is a fundamental input into nearly all economic activity. When energy costs rise, every sector faces higher costs, and central banks can find themselves juggling the risk of inflation against the imperative to support growth. The macro calculus becomes especially delicate if markets price in a persistent energy premium that persists through the next several quarters, complicating any hopes of an early, policy‑driven risk‑on rally for crypto and other speculative assets.

Policy uncertainty and the Fed’s calculated stance

The Federal Open Market Committee’s decision to hold the Federal Funds rate at 3.5%–3.75% in March reflected a cautious stance in the face of renewed energy‑driven inflation risks. Market observers say that near‑term rate cuts have faded from the central scenario, while a minority of traders assign a non‑negligible probability to a rate move higher in the near term, as reflected by the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, which placed the odds of a hike at around 12% for the next meeting.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged that the economic implications of the Middle East conflict are unclear in the near term. Speaking at a press conference, he stressed that while energy prices are a potential drag on inflation and growth, it is still “too soon” to accurately gauge the full scope of the disruption’s impact on the broader economy. The central bank’s ongoing assessment will hinge on incoming data, including energy price trajectories, inflation readings, and indicators of domestic demand.

Measured against today’s macro backdrop, the risk premium for risk assets, including crypto, could be influenced by how energy costs evolve and how quickly monetary policy adapts. If energy prices remain elevated and inflation proves more persistent than anticipated, the Fed may lean toward a tighter stance for longer, which could constrain liquidity in markets and temper speculative appetites. Conversely, any signs of cooling inflation or a surprise easing in market stress could renew expectations for looser policy and a more favorable environment for higher‑beta assets.

What readers should watch next

Investors should monitor three interconnected threads in the coming weeks: first, the trajectory of global oil prices and the duration of any supply disruptions through strategic chokepoints; second, the evolving assessment of inflation and growth signals that inform Fed policy; and third, how sentiment around geopolitical risk interacts with liquidity conditions in crypto markets. With the energy‑inflation nexus likely to dominate near‑term headlines, traders would be wise to differentiate between narrative positioning and data‑driven developments as markets digest the evolving risk landscape.

In this environment, the market’s reflex to geopolitical risk could remain biphasic: periods of reprieve followed by renewed volatility as new information emerges about the conflict’s scope, energy infrastructure resilience, and policy responses. Keep an eye on energy price momentum, central bank communications, and liquidity signals across major crypto and traditional risk assets to gauge where the next phase of the cycle may lead.

This article was originally published as Analyst warns traders pricing in TACO trade could face a rude awakening on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

新しいエントリーは大企業とETFで構成されています

追加された証券は、テクノロジー、エネルギー、航空宇宙などの分野にわたります。また、IonQ、Eaton、Rocket Lab、GE Vernova、VinFast Autoがトークン化された企業となりました。また、iShares MSCI India ETFやVanguard Real Estate ETFなどの上場投資信託もプラットフォームに参加しています。

Ondo Global Marketsは現在、さまざまなブロックチェーンネットワーク上で250以上のトークン化された金融商品に取り組んでいます。これらはEthereum、Solana、BNB Chainでアクセス可能で、より多くのグローバル市場へのアクセスを可能にします。さらに、新しい証券はすぐにプラットフォームに上場され、取引可能です。

現在の視点は歴史的相関によって決まります

リーは、トム・デマークという市場技術者の分析に基づいて意見の一部を形成しました。データは、イーサリアムの最近の価格傾向が1987年の暴落および2011年の修正中にS&P 500と高度に相関していることを示しています。これらの傾向は、イーサリアムがすでに底に達しているか、または近づいている可能性があることを示唆しています。

今日現在、イーサリアムは実際の価格2,241に対して約22パーセントのディスカウントで取引されています。この測定は、オンチェーン上のすべてのコインの平均価格フロアを表しています。さらに、過去のサイクルの底で同様のディスカウントが観察されており、売却圧力が減少している可能性があるという考えを支持しています。

プロのトレーダー、アレッシオ・ラスタニは、ビットコインの見通しを見直し、市場が本格的な底が形成される前に$60,000を下回る可能性があることを示唆している。最近のCointelegraphのインタビューで、ラスタニは、ビットコインが今年の初めに一時的な回復を見せたものの、その反発の形状はまだ持続的な上昇トレンドを正当化するものではないと説明した。

ラスタニは、彼のより広範な弱気から中立の立場を放棄していない。彼は、現在の価格動向が構造的に脆弱であると主張している。その結果、彼が言うには、買い手が確信を取り戻し、持続的な底が形成される前に、さらなる低水準のテストの可能性が高まっているということだ。