Binance Square

Bit_Rase

image
認証済みクリエイター
Crypto Enthusiast | #BTC since 2017 | NFTs, Exchanges and Blockchain Analysis #Binance kol @Bit_Rise #CMC kol X. 👉@Meech_1000x kol @Bit_Rise #DM #TG @Bit_Risee
取引を発注
BTCホルダー
BTCホルダー
超高頻度トレーダー
4.3年
97 フォロー
40.0K+ フォロワー
96.4K+ いいね
3.6K+ 共有
投稿
ポートフォリオ
PINNED
·
--
翻訳参照
#mira $MIRA Is Mira Network a short-term narrative or a long-term bet? When I look at Mira — positioned as the “Trust Layer of AI” — I think the answer depends entirely on which layer of the stack they truly manage to solve. If Mira leans mainly on short-cycle themes like “AI trading” or “on-chain automation” without building a resilient execution layer underneath, it risks becoming just another cyclical play. These narratives can attract capital quickly, but without a defensible edge, that capital can disappear just as fast. On the other hand, if Mira delivers a durable product layer — offering high-quality execution, predictable costs, and addressing structural issues such as MEV — then it would be tackling a core market need. As institutional players and automated strategies increase their presence, they will require infrastructure that operates reliably over the long term, not just during hype cycles. Right now, Mira seems to sit between those two possibilities. It has a compelling short-term narrative that can capture attention. But its long-term value will depend entirely on whether it can demonstrate real product-market fit at the execution layer and sustain meaningful liquidity over time. @mira_network #mira $MIRA
#mira $MIRA Is Mira Network a short-term narrative or a long-term bet?
When I look at Mira — positioned as the “Trust Layer of AI” — I think the answer depends entirely on which layer of the stack they truly manage to solve.
If Mira leans mainly on short-cycle themes like “AI trading” or “on-chain automation” without building a resilient execution layer underneath, it risks becoming just another cyclical play. These narratives can attract capital quickly, but without a defensible edge, that capital can disappear just as fast.
On the other hand, if Mira delivers a durable product layer — offering high-quality execution, predictable costs, and addressing structural issues such as MEV — then it would be tackling a core market need. As institutional players and automated strategies increase their presence, they will require infrastructure that operates reliably over the long term, not just during hype cycles.
Right now, Mira seems to sit between those two possibilities. It has a compelling short-term narrative that can capture attention. But its long-term value will depend entirely on whether it can demonstrate real product-market fit at the execution layer and sustain meaningful liquidity over time. @Mira - Trust Layer of AI
#mira $MIRA
PINNED
ミラを潜在的な隠れた宝石にするポイントミラを見てください - アプリケーションとインフラストラクチャの交差点に位置するAIの信頼レイヤー。中間地点は、純粋に物語によって推進される多くのプロジェクトよりも魅力的にしています。 隠れた宝石は通常、過剰な約束をするものではありません - それは静かに現実の見落とされた問題を解決しているものです。ミラでは、焦点が実行とオンチェーン取引体験にあるようです - プロフェッショナルユーザーが依然として持続的な摩擦に直面している領域です。 目立つ最初の点の1つは抑制です。ミラは独自のチェーンを立ち上げたり、同時に複数の縦の市場に拡大しようとしていません。代わりに、特定のユースケースのレイヤーに集中し、それを最適化しています。この規律は、広範なビジョンが焦点を絞った製品よりも報われることが多い暗号の世界では珍しいものです。 $MIRA がこの明快さを維持しているという事実は、価値創造に対する実用的なアプローチを示唆しています。

ミラを潜在的な隠れた宝石にするポイント

ミラを見てください - アプリケーションとインフラストラクチャの交差点に位置するAIの信頼レイヤー。中間地点は、純粋に物語によって推進される多くのプロジェクトよりも魅力的にしています。
隠れた宝石は通常、過剰な約束をするものではありません - それは静かに現実の見落とされた問題を解決しているものです。ミラでは、焦点が実行とオンチェーン取引体験にあるようです - プロフェッショナルユーザーが依然として持続的な摩擦に直面している領域です。
目立つ最初の点の1つは抑制です。ミラは独自のチェーンを立ち上げたり、同時に複数の縦の市場に拡大しようとしていません。代わりに、特定のユースケースのレイヤーに集中し、それを最適化しています。この規律は、広範なビジョンが焦点を絞った製品よりも報われることが多い暗号の世界では珍しいものです。 $MIRA がこの明快さを維持しているという事実は、価値創造に対する実用的なアプローチを示唆しています。
翻訳参照
$DENT Massive 50% run and now cooling above 0.00035. Dip buyers stepping in again. Buy Zone: 0.000340 – 0.000365 TP1: 0.000400 TP2: 0.000440 TP3: 0.000500 Stop: 0.000300💵 👈 {spot}(DENTUSDT)
$DENT
Massive 50% run and now cooling above 0.00035. Dip buyers stepping in again.
Buy Zone: 0.000340 – 0.000365
TP1: 0.000400
TP2: 0.000440
TP3: 0.000500
Stop: 0.000300💵 👈
翻訳参照
$ZAMA Strong breakout and holding near highs. Momentum chasing in hard. Buy Zone: 0.0248 – 0.0254 TP1: 0.0270 TP2: 0.0295 TP3: 0.0320 Stop: 0.0235💵 👈 {spot}(ZAMAUSDT)
$ZAMA
Strong breakout and holding near highs. Momentum chasing in hard.
Buy Zone: 0.0248 – 0.0254
TP1: 0.0270
TP2: 0.0295
TP3: 0.0320
Stop: 0.0235💵 👈
翻訳参照
$ZAMA Strong Bullish Structure Above 0.022 With Break Toward 0.026 Trade Setup: Entry Zone: 0.0240 – 0.0255 Targets: 0.0280 0.0320 0.0400 Stop Loss: 0.0215 💵 👈 {spot}(ZAMAUSDT)
$ZAMA Strong Bullish Structure Above 0.022 With Break Toward 0.026
Trade Setup:
Entry Zone: 0.0240 – 0.0255
Targets:
0.0280
0.0320
0.0400
Stop Loss: 0.0215 💵 👈
翻訳参照
$HOT strong bullish continuation after breakout above 0.00045 resistance, expanding with high momentum and volume surge. Long $HOT Entry: 0.000480 – 0.000510 SL: 0.000430 TP1: 0.000560 TP2: 0.000620 TP3: 0.000700 Price built accumulation around 0.00038–0.00042 and printed a powerful impulse candle clearing range highs. Structure shows higher lows holding above 0.00045 breakout zone. As long as 0.000430 holds, continuation toward upper resistance levels remains likely. Buy and trade 👇💵 💵 👈 {spot}(HOTUSDT)
$HOT strong bullish continuation after breakout above 0.00045 resistance, expanding with high momentum and volume surge.
Long $HOT
Entry: 0.000480 – 0.000510
SL: 0.000430
TP1: 0.000560
TP2: 0.000620
TP3: 0.000700
Price built accumulation around 0.00038–0.00042 and printed a powerful impulse candle clearing range highs. Structure shows higher lows holding above 0.00045 breakout zone. As long as 0.000430 holds, continuation toward upper resistance levels remains likely.
Buy and trade 👇💵 💵 👈
翻訳参照
$PYTH Entry Zone: 0.0505 – 0.0518 Targets: TP1: 0.0545 TP2: 0.0570 TP3: 0.0600 Stop Loss: 0.0490 MY Analysis: Price rejected lower after pullback, now consolidating around MA99 (0.0520) and MA25 (0.0516) with MA7 (~0.0532) overhead. Volume dried on downside, early green candles show support holding. Bullish if reclaims 0.0523+ with volume; still range-bound after spike. Decent R:R ~1:3+ on dip buys if 0.0505 holds, watch breakout or rejection at 0.053–0.054.💵 👈 {spot}(PYTHUSDT)
$PYTH
Entry Zone: 0.0505 – 0.0518
Targets:
TP1: 0.0545
TP2: 0.0570
TP3: 0.0600
Stop Loss: 0.0490
MY Analysis: Price rejected lower after pullback, now consolidating around MA99 (0.0520) and MA25 (0.0516) with MA7 (~0.0532) overhead. Volume dried on downside, early green candles show support holding. Bullish if reclaims 0.0523+ with volume; still range-bound after spike. Decent R:R ~1:3+ on dip buys if 0.0505 holds, watch breakout or rejection at 0.053–0.054.💵 👈
翻訳参照
$ZEC (4H) is ranging near support after a prolonged downtrend, with $234-$238 acting as a key demand zone and $263 as mid-range resistance. Momentum is weak, so confirmation is needed before any long bias. Setup: If price sweeps $234 liquidity and reclaims above $238 with strong 4H close, enter long → TP1 $245, TP2 $263, SL below $230. 💵 💵 👈 {spot}(ZECUSDT)
$ZEC (4H) is ranging near support after a prolonged downtrend, with $234-$238 acting as a key demand zone and $263 as mid-range resistance. Momentum is weak, so confirmation is needed before any long bias.
Setup: If price sweeps $234 liquidity and reclaims above $238 with strong 4H close, enter long → TP1 $245, TP2 $263, SL below $230. 💵 💵 👈
翻訳参照
Soon $SOL will touch my 1st tp which is at 82$ Now I will move my SOL SL at entry because if any reversal happen that will be a bad sign💵 👈 {spot}(SOLUSDT)
Soon $SOL will touch my 1st tp which is at 82$ Now I will move my SOL SL at entry because if any reversal happen that will be a bad sign💵 👈
翻訳参照
$SXT bullish rebound setup full retrace into the launch base, sellers fading Buy Zone: 0.0198 – 0.0203 EP: 0.0202 TP1: 0.0220 TP2: 0.0245 TP3: 0.0269 SL: 0.0193 Hold the 0.0200 floor and the bounce can snap back into the post-spike range. 💵 👈 {spot}(SXTUSDT)
$SXT bullish rebound setup full retrace into the launch base, sellers fading
Buy Zone: 0.0198 – 0.0203
EP: 0.0202
TP1: 0.0220
TP2: 0.0245
TP3: 0.0269
SL: 0.0193
Hold the 0.0200 floor and the bounce can snap back into the post-spike range. 💵 👈
翻訳参照
MA 200 Weekly: Long-term Accumulation Zone of Bitcoin Through the CyclesOne of the simple yet quite effective principles I've observed through many cycles is that a good accumulation zone for $BTC often appears when the price fluctuates around the MA 200 on the weekly chart. This is not a 'holy grail indicator', but it clearly reflects the long-term balance between supply and demand. In previous cycles, when BTC fell sharply and then gradually stabilized around the MA 200W, the market often entered a transitional phase from distribution to accumulation. At this moment, the panic selling has subsided, while long-term capital flows are starting to return, but not strong enough to create a clear upward trend. Prices tend to move sideways, fluctuate slowly, and can easily cause investors to lose patience. This 'boredom' is actually a favorable condition for accumulation. When the market is no longer too hot and short-term expectations decrease, the risk of buying at a peak is also lower. The MA 200W can thus be seen as a psychological reference area and long-term valuation, where those with a long-term vision begin to build positions. Of course, there are no absolute guarantees. The MA 200W should be combined with capital management, DCA, and a macro perspective to make more reasonable decisions. #BTC $BTC

MA 200 Weekly: Long-term Accumulation Zone of Bitcoin Through the Cycles

One of the simple yet quite effective principles I've observed through many cycles is that a good accumulation zone for $BTC often appears when the price fluctuates around the MA 200 on the weekly chart.
This is not a 'holy grail indicator', but it clearly reflects the long-term balance between supply and demand.
In previous cycles, when BTC fell sharply and then gradually stabilized around the MA 200W, the market often entered a transitional phase from distribution to accumulation.
At this moment, the panic selling has subsided, while long-term capital flows are starting to return, but not strong enough to create a clear upward trend. Prices tend to move sideways, fluctuate slowly, and can easily cause investors to lose patience.
This 'boredom' is actually a favorable condition for accumulation. When the market is no longer too hot and short-term expectations decrease, the risk of buying at a peak is also lower.
The MA 200W can thus be seen as a psychological reference area and long-term valuation, where those with a long-term vision begin to build positions.
Of course, there are no absolute guarantees. The MA 200W should be combined with capital management, DCA, and a macro perspective to make more reasonable decisions.
#BTC $BTC
翻訳参照
$GUA USDT – Pullback After 0.256 Spike 👀 $GUA rallied from 0.155 → 0.2568 and now cooling near 0.239. Structure still bullish overall (higher highs + higher lows), but short-term momentum slowing. Key support: 0.225–0.230 zone. If this area holds, continuation toward 0.26 → 0.28 is possible. Break below 0.225 = deeper pullback toward 0.21. Pullback Long Setup: Entry: 0.228–0.240 TP1: 0.260 TP2: 0.280 SL: 0.219 Trend is still upward, but wait for strong bounce confirmation before heavy size.💵 👈 {future}(GUAUSDT)
$GUA USDT – Pullback After 0.256 Spike 👀
$GUA rallied from 0.155 → 0.2568 and now cooling near 0.239. Structure still bullish overall (higher highs + higher lows), but short-term momentum slowing.
Key support: 0.225–0.230 zone.
If this area holds, continuation toward 0.26 → 0.28 is possible.
Break below 0.225 = deeper pullback toward 0.21.
Pullback Long Setup:
Entry: 0.228–0.240
TP1: 0.260
TP2: 0.280
SL: 0.219
Trend is still upward, but wait for strong bounce confirmation before heavy size.💵 👈
翻訳参照
$HOT {spot}(HOTUSDT) USDT – Strong Impulse, Watching Pullback 🔥 $HOT spiked to 0.000487 and now trading around 0.000452. That’s a clean expansion move after consolidation — momentum clearly bullish. Key support: 0.000435–0.000440. If this zone holds, continuation toward 0.00050 → 0.00052 is possible. Break below 0.000435 with volume = pullback toward 0.000405. Pullback Long: Entry: 0.000440–0.000455 TP1: 0.000495 TP2: 0.000520 SL: 0.000420 After a 16% move, manage risk — don’t chase vertical candles.💵 💵 👈
$HOT
USDT – Strong Impulse, Watching Pullback 🔥
$HOT spiked to 0.000487 and now trading around 0.000452. That’s a clean expansion move after consolidation — momentum clearly bullish.
Key support: 0.000435–0.000440.
If this zone holds, continuation toward 0.00050 → 0.00052 is possible.
Break below 0.000435 with volume = pullback toward 0.000405.
Pullback Long:
Entry: 0.000440–0.000455
TP1: 0.000495
TP2: 0.000520
SL: 0.000420
After a 16% move, manage risk — don’t chase vertical candles.💵 💵 👈
翻訳参照
$KGST holding near $0.01137 in early accumulation phase. Weak hands exiting while stronger hands absorb supply. TG1 $0.0140 TG2 $0.0185 TG3 $0.0240 Short term sideways movement expected before breakout. Long term upside potential remains significant once momentum returns.💵 👈 {spot}(KGSTUSDT)
$KGST holding near $0.01137 in early accumulation phase. Weak hands exiting while stronger hands absorb supply.
TG1 $0.0140
TG2 $0.0185
TG3 $0.0240
Short term sideways movement expected before breakout. Long term upside potential remains significant once momentum returns.💵 👈
私たちは最下位です。 しかし、落ち込みはそれほど急激ではないでしょう。
私たちは最下位です。

しかし、落ち込みはそれほど急激ではないでしょう。
翻訳参照
Can Fogo evolve into a true settlement layer for on-chain trading?once closed a fairly large position on a dApp. The order matched quickly, but I still had to wait a little longer to feel confident the state was final and wouldn’t change. That brief pause highlighted something important: execution and settlement are not the same thing. When testing on Fogo, execution felt extremely fast. But the deeper question remains: can it function as a settlement layer, where once an order is processed, the result is immediately final and fully trusted? In trading, settlement is more than just writing a transaction to the ledger. It means certainty. Account balances, positions, margin levels, and collateral must update consistently and irreversibly. For products like perpetuals and options, settlement also touches funding payments, liquidations, and risk calculations. It’s an integrated financial process, not just a technical confirmation. Fogo’s clearest strength lies in execution speed and low latency. When transaction ordering is stable and blocks propagate quickly, the gap between “order matched” and “finalized” can shrink significantly. That matters for market makers and active traders, who otherwise need to maintain capital buffers to hedge latency risk. However, a settlement layer serves more than a single dApp. It must support multiple applications simultaneously, each updating global state in parallel. High throughput alone is not enough. The network must ensure that every node converges on the same state quickly and reliably, even under heavy load. At scale, that’s a non-trivial coordination challenge. Stablecoin liquidity is another critical component. Most on-chain trading settles in stablecoins. For smooth PnL realization, margin transfers, and liquidations, deep and reliable stablecoin flow is essential. Without sufficient liquidity, even a fast chain cannot provide robust financial settlement. Oracles are equally important. Many financial products rely on external price feeds. If oracle updates lag behind execution speed, inconsistencies can arise between trade execution and settlement pricing. A viable settlement layer needs fast, manipulation-resistant, and tightly synchronized oracle infrastructure. Architecturally, optimizing validator clients and networking reduces block and state propagation times, which strengthens settlement guarantees. But higher performance often means higher hardware requirements, potentially limiting validator participation. Financial settlement demands both performance and resilience, so this trade-off must be carefully balanced. There’s also the multi-chain dimension. In a fragmented ecosystem, applications may operate across various chains, while settlement consolidates on a single fast and reliable layer. If Fogo builds seamless bridging and messaging infrastructure, it could potentially serve that role. Yet cross-chain latency and bridge risk would then become part of the settlement equation. Fees and incentives must also align. Settlement infrastructure needs high throughput at low cost to remain attractive for traders, while still providing sufficient rewards to secure the network. If fees are too low, validator sustainability suffers. If too high, liquidity migrates elsewhere. User experience plays a subtle but vital role. A strong settlement layer is invisible to the user. Traders should see matched orders and updated balances instantly, without uncertainty or repeated checks. Wallets, explorers, and dApps must reflect network state clearly and consistently. During peak market conditions, when volume and liquidations spike, the true test emerges. Maintaining stability under stress builds credibility with professional traders and market makers. Trust, over time, becomes just as valuable as speed. Many networks offer fast transactions, but few achieve the operational stability required to serve as a financial settlement backbone. Long-term uptime, incident resilience, and ecosystem maturity are critical. Fogo appears to have foundational qualities: fast execution, low latency, and an emphasis on predictable network behavior. To solidify its role as a settlement layer, it would still need deeper stablecoin liquidity, robust oracle infrastructure, seamless cross-chain connectivity, and sustained operational reliability. Whether Fogo becomes a shared settlement layer for multiple applications or remains primarily a high-speed execution venue for specific dApps may ultimately depend on adoption and market dynamics. In the end, the market will decide where Fogo fits on that spectrum. @fogo #fogo $FOGO {spot}(FOGOUSDT)

Can Fogo evolve into a true settlement layer for on-chain trading?

once closed a fairly large position on a dApp. The order matched quickly, but I still had to wait a little longer to feel confident the state was final and wouldn’t change. That brief pause highlighted something important: execution and settlement are not the same thing.
When testing on Fogo, execution felt extremely fast. But the deeper question remains: can it function as a settlement layer, where once an order is processed, the result is immediately final and fully trusted?
In trading, settlement is more than just writing a transaction to the ledger. It means certainty. Account balances, positions, margin levels, and collateral must update consistently and irreversibly. For products like perpetuals and options, settlement also touches funding payments, liquidations, and risk calculations. It’s an integrated financial process, not just a technical confirmation.
Fogo’s clearest strength lies in execution speed and low latency. When transaction ordering is stable and blocks propagate quickly, the gap between “order matched” and “finalized” can shrink significantly. That matters for market makers and active traders, who otherwise need to maintain capital buffers to hedge latency risk.
However, a settlement layer serves more than a single dApp. It must support multiple applications simultaneously, each updating global state in parallel. High throughput alone is not enough. The network must ensure that every node converges on the same state quickly and reliably, even under heavy load. At scale, that’s a non-trivial coordination challenge.
Stablecoin liquidity is another critical component. Most on-chain trading settles in stablecoins. For smooth PnL realization, margin transfers, and liquidations, deep and reliable stablecoin flow is essential. Without sufficient liquidity, even a fast chain cannot provide robust financial settlement.
Oracles are equally important. Many financial products rely on external price feeds. If oracle updates lag behind execution speed, inconsistencies can arise between trade execution and settlement pricing. A viable settlement layer needs fast, manipulation-resistant, and tightly synchronized oracle infrastructure.
Architecturally, optimizing validator clients and networking reduces block and state propagation times, which strengthens settlement guarantees. But higher performance often means higher hardware requirements, potentially limiting validator participation. Financial settlement demands both performance and resilience, so this trade-off must be carefully balanced.
There’s also the multi-chain dimension. In a fragmented ecosystem, applications may operate across various chains, while settlement consolidates on a single fast and reliable layer. If Fogo builds seamless bridging and messaging infrastructure, it could potentially serve that role. Yet cross-chain latency and bridge risk would then become part of the settlement equation.
Fees and incentives must also align. Settlement infrastructure needs high throughput at low cost to remain attractive for traders, while still providing sufficient rewards to secure the network. If fees are too low, validator sustainability suffers. If too high, liquidity migrates elsewhere.
User experience plays a subtle but vital role. A strong settlement layer is invisible to the user. Traders should see matched orders and updated balances instantly, without uncertainty or repeated checks. Wallets, explorers, and dApps must reflect network state clearly and consistently.
During peak market conditions, when volume and liquidations spike, the true test emerges. Maintaining stability under stress builds credibility with professional traders and market makers. Trust, over time, becomes just as valuable as speed.
Many networks offer fast transactions, but few achieve the operational stability required to serve as a financial settlement backbone. Long-term uptime, incident resilience, and ecosystem maturity are critical.
Fogo appears to have foundational qualities: fast execution, low latency, and an emphasis on predictable network behavior. To solidify its role as a settlement layer, it would still need deeper stablecoin liquidity, robust oracle infrastructure, seamless cross-chain connectivity, and sustained operational reliability.
Whether Fogo becomes a shared settlement layer for multiple applications or remains primarily a high-speed execution venue for specific dApps may ultimately depend on adoption and market dynamics.
In the end, the market will decide where Fogo fits on that spectrum.
@Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO
翻訳参照
Strong momentum building $ZRO preparing for next move $ZRO Direction: LONG Entry: $1.50 – $1.54 Targets: TP1 $1.60 TP2 $1.68 TP3 $1.80 Stop Loss: $1.45 Holding structure with buyers defending support and momentum gradually shifting bullish for continuation Buy and Trade $ZRO 💵 💵 👈 {spot}(ZROUSDT)
Strong momentum building $ZRO preparing for next move
$ZRO
Direction: LONG
Entry: $1.50 – $1.54
Targets:
TP1 $1.60
TP2 $1.68
TP3 $1.80
Stop Loss: $1.45
Holding structure with buyers defending support and momentum gradually shifting bullish for continuation
Buy and Trade $ZRO 💵 💵 👈
翻訳参照
$ICP Range Breakout Long 💵 Price pushing up after long sideways movement and buyers stepping in Looks like a breakout attempt with room for continuation. Entry: 2.38 – 2.45 TP1: 2.60 TP2: 2.85 TP3: 3.20 SL: 2.25💵 💵 👈 {spot}(ICPUSDT)
$ICP Range Breakout Long 💵
Price pushing up after long sideways movement and buyers stepping in
Looks like a breakout attempt with room for continuation.
Entry: 2.38 – 2.45
TP1: 2.60
TP2: 2.85
TP3: 3.20
SL: 2.25💵 💵 👈
翻訳参照
$FOGO Breakout Above 0.029 With Strong Momentum Toward 0.031 Trade Setup: Entry Zone: 0.0290 – 0.0305 Targets: 0.0330 0.0380 0.0450 Stop Loss: 0.0270 💵 👈 {spot}(FOGOUSDT)
$FOGO Breakout Above 0.029 With Strong Momentum Toward 0.031
Trade Setup:
Entry Zone: 0.0290 – 0.0305
Targets:
0.0330
0.0380
0.0450
Stop Loss: 0.0270 💵 👈
Fogoは新規ユーザーの体験を簡素化できます。 私は一度、初心者がFogo Officialを試すのを手伝ったことがあります。興味深いことに、彼らはTPS、コンセンサスデザイン、またはバリデーターについて尋ねませんでした。彼らの唯一の懸念はシンプルでした:「送信ボタンを押したら、どれくらい時間がかかりますか?何か設定する必要がありますか?」 彼らが最初の取引を行ったとき、それは迅速に確認され、長い遅延なしに完了しました。その即時のフィードバックは、システムを応答性があり信頼できるものとして感じさせました。迅速な実行は、多くの新規ユーザーがオンチェーンで初めてやり取りする際のためらいを減らします。 Fogoは明らかに実行レイヤーでの利点を持っています。スムーズな確認と低遅延は、新しいユーザーをしばしば思いとどまらせる心理的摩擦を減少させます。 しかし、速度だけでは単純さにはなりません。 新規ユーザーはまだウォレットの設定、手数料管理、クロスチェーン転送に関して混乱に直面しています。取引が速くても、全体の旅は断片的に感じることがあります。本当にオンボーディングを簡素化するためには、ユーザーは直感的なウォレット、透明な入出金フロー、予測可能なコスト、理想的にはガスやネットワーク設定についての最小限の懸念を必要とします。 アカウント抽象化やペイマスターのようなソリューションは、複雑さを抽象化し、体験を従来のアプリに近づけるのに役立つかもしれません。 Fogoはすでにスムーズな体験を提供するための技術的基盤を持っています。ただし、長期的な保持は実行速度だけに依存するのではなく、最初のクリックから通常の使用までの全体のユーザージャーニーがどれだけシームレスに感じられるかに依存します。 @fogo #fogo $FOGO {spot}(FOGOUSDT)
Fogoは新規ユーザーの体験を簡素化できます。
私は一度、初心者がFogo Officialを試すのを手伝ったことがあります。興味深いことに、彼らはTPS、コンセンサスデザイン、またはバリデーターについて尋ねませんでした。彼らの唯一の懸念はシンプルでした:「送信ボタンを押したら、どれくらい時間がかかりますか?何か設定する必要がありますか?」
彼らが最初の取引を行ったとき、それは迅速に確認され、長い遅延なしに完了しました。その即時のフィードバックは、システムを応答性があり信頼できるものとして感じさせました。迅速な実行は、多くの新規ユーザーがオンチェーンで初めてやり取りする際のためらいを減らします。
Fogoは明らかに実行レイヤーでの利点を持っています。スムーズな確認と低遅延は、新しいユーザーをしばしば思いとどまらせる心理的摩擦を減少させます。
しかし、速度だけでは単純さにはなりません。
新規ユーザーはまだウォレットの設定、手数料管理、クロスチェーン転送に関して混乱に直面しています。取引が速くても、全体の旅は断片的に感じることがあります。本当にオンボーディングを簡素化するためには、ユーザーは直感的なウォレット、透明な入出金フロー、予測可能なコスト、理想的にはガスやネットワーク設定についての最小限の懸念を必要とします。
アカウント抽象化やペイマスターのようなソリューションは、複雑さを抽象化し、体験を従来のアプリに近づけるのに役立つかもしれません。
Fogoはすでにスムーズな体験を提供するための技術的基盤を持っています。ただし、長期的な保持は実行速度だけに依存するのではなく、最初のクリックから通常の使用までの全体のユーザージャーニーがどれだけシームレスに感じられるかに依存します。
@Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO
さらにコンテンツを探すには、ログインしてください
暗号資産関連最新ニュース総まとめ
⚡️ 暗号資産に関する最新のディスカッションに参加
💬 お気に入りのクリエイターと交流
👍 興味のあるコンテンツがきっと見つかります
メール / 電話番号
サイトマップ
Cookieの設定
プラットフォーム利用規約