H A N I A

Il blockchain è spesso lodato per la trasparenza, ma una trasparenza totale non è sempre pratica—specialmente nel settore finanziario. Dusk Network è stato creato per offrire una soluzione più intelligente combinando la tecnologia blockchain con una forte privacy e un'utilizzabilità nel mondo reale.
Dusk è un blockchain progettato per applicazioni finanziarie riservate. Permette agli utenti di inviare asset, eseguire contratti intelligenti e interagire con applicazioni decentralizzate senza rivelare dettagli sensibili. Ciò viene realizzato tramite proof di conoscenza zero, una tecnologia che conferma la correttezza delle transazioni mantenendo i dati nascosti.

Risk management in crypto is the process of protecting your capital while trading or investing in a market that is highly volatile, fast-moving, and sometimes unpredictable. In simple words, it means controlling your losses, staying disciplined, and making sure one bad trade doesn’t wipe out your entire portfolio.
The first and most important rule of crypto risk management is never invest money you can’t afford to lose. Crypto can give huge returns, but it can also crash quickly due to news, regulations, hacks, whale movements, or market manipulation. A smart investor always plans for the worst-case scenario.
One key part of risk management is position sizing. This means you should not put all your money into one coin or one trade. Many traders follow the rule of risking only 1% to 3% of their total capital on a single trade. This keeps your account safe even if you face multiple losses in a row.
Another powerful tool is using a stop-loss. A stop-loss is a pre-set exit point where you automatically sell if the price goes against you. It prevents emotional decisions and protects you from holding a losing trade for too long. In crypto, where prices can drop suddenly, stop-loss can be the difference between a small loss and a disaster.
Diversification is also important. Instead of investing only in one token, you can spread your funds across different categories like Bitcoin, Ethereum, strong altcoins, and stablecoins. This reduces the impact if one project fails. However, too much diversification can also reduce profits, so balance is necessary.
You should also manage risks like leverage trading. Leverage can multiply profits, but it can also multiply losses. Many beginners get liquidated because they use high leverage without proper planning. If you use leverage, keep it low and always have a clear exit plan.
Lastly, risk management includes controlling your mindset. Avoid FOMO (fear of missing out), panic selling, and overtrading. Always follow a strategy, take profits step by step, and keep learning. In crypto, survival is the real success. If you protect your capital, you’ll always have the chance to grow it again.

Plasma is emerging as a new kind of Layer 1 blockchain—one that isn’t trying to be everything for everyone. Instead, it focuses on a single mission that the market has been demanding for years: stablecoin settlement that is fast, cheap, and built for real-world usage. In an industry where many networks chase general-purpose narratives, Plasma feels different because it is designed around the most used product in crypto today—stablecoins.
Stablecoins have quietly become the backbone of on-chain finance. They power remittances, trading, cross-border payments, merchant settlements, and everyday peer-to-peer transfers. Yet despite their importance, most stablecoin activity still runs on blockchains that were not optimized for stablecoin flows. Users often face high fees during congestion, inconsistent confirmation times, and poor payment experience when sending small amounts. Plasma aims to solve that by building a stablecoin-first Layer 1 from the ground up.
At the core of Plasma is full EVM compatibility, powered by Reth. This matters because EVM compatibility is the easiest path to developer adoption. It allows Ethereum-based applications, smart contracts, and tools to migrate without needing to rewrite everything. For builders, it means the existing ecosystem of wallets, infrastructure, and developer frameworks can plug into Plasma with minimal friction. Plasma isn’t asking developers to learn a new environment—it is meeting them where they already are.
But compatibility alone isn’t enough for payments. Stablecoin settlement requires speed, reliability, and finality that feels close to traditional finance. Plasma addresses this with sub-second finality through PlasmaBFT, its consensus mechanism designed for rapid confirmation. This is a crucial detail because in real payment systems, waiting several seconds—or minutes—can feel unacceptable. Whether it’s a retail user sending USDT to family, a merchant receiving payment, or an institution settling transactions, the experience needs to be near-instant. Plasma’s sub-second finality is built to make stablecoin transfers feel smooth, responsive, and practical.
One of the most interesting parts of Plasma is how it treats stablecoins not as just another token, but as the main product. Traditional chains treat stablecoins like any other asset: you pay gas in the native token, and the stablecoin is simply what you transfer. Plasma flips this model by introducing stablecoin-centric features such as stablecoin-first gas. That means users can potentially pay fees using stablecoins rather than needing to hold a separate volatile token just to transact. This solves a major pain point for mass adoption because the average stablecoin user does not want exposure to another token just to send money.
Even more powerful is the idea of gasless USDT transfers. In many high-adoption markets, USDT is used like digital cash. People want to send it instantly, repeatedly, and in small amounts. But gas fees—especially during network congestion—make this difficult. A “gasless” transfer experience makes stablecoins behave closer to what users expect from modern payment apps. It lowers the barrier for retail users, improves usability for newcomers, and makes stablecoin transactions more accessible at scale.

Plasma’s vision also extends beyond performance and convenience. A major part of its design philosophy is neutrality and censorship resistance, which is where Bitcoin-anchored security comes into the picture. Bitcoin is widely viewed as the most neutral and battle-tested blockchain, with strong security assumptions and global recognition. By anchoring security to Bitcoin, Plasma aims to strengthen trust in the settlement layer and reduce the risk of centralized control. This design choice signals that Plasma is not only building for speed, but also for long-term resilience.

Neutrality matters deeply for stablecoin settlement because stablecoins sit at the intersection of finance, regulation, and global commerce. In regions where stablecoins are heavily used, people often rely on them as protection against inflation, capital restrictions, or banking limitations. For these users, censorship resistance is not a theoretical benefit—it can be essential. Plasma’s approach suggests it wants to build a network that can remain reliable even under pressure, making it a serious candidate for global settlement use cases.
The target audience for Plasma reflects this dual reality. On one side, it aims to serve retail users in high-adoption markets—places where stablecoins are already part of everyday life. These users care about speed, low cost, and simplicity. They want transactions that work instantly, without complicated steps or additional tokens. They want a stablecoin network that feels like sending a message, not running a blockchain operation.
On the other side, Plasma is also designed for institutions operating in payments and finance. This is a critical direction because institutional stablecoin usage is growing fast. Payment processors, fintech companies, cross-border settlement networks, and financial platforms increasingly see stablecoins as a tool for faster, cheaper movement of value. For institutions, stablecoin settlement requires reliability, predictable finality, and a network that can handle large volumes without breaking under demand. Plasma’s architecture—EVM compatibility, fast finality, and stablecoin-first design—positions it well for this institutional wave.
What makes Plasma feel especially relevant is timing. Stablecoins are already winning in adoption, but the infrastructure they run on still feels like it was built for a different era of crypto. Plasma is essentially asking a simple question: what if we build a blockchain where stablecoins are not an afterthought, but the main purpose? That shift in focus could be a major unlock for mainstream adoption, especially in regions where stablecoins are already more useful than local banking rails.
In the bigger picture, Plasma represents a new trend in blockchain design: specialization. Instead of competing as a general Layer 1 with endless narratives, it is carving out a clear identity as a settlement layer for stablecoins. If execution matches the vision, Plasma could become the kind of infrastructure that quietly powers millions of daily transactions without needing constant hype.
Ultimately, Plasma is not trying to reinvent crypto—it’s trying to make stablecoin usage finally feel like a real payment network. With gasless USDT transfers, stablecoin-first gas, sub-second finality, EVM compatibility, and Bitcoin-anchored security, Plasma is positioning itself as a serious contender for the next phase of global stablecoin settlement.
#Plasma $XPL

La Vanar Chain è parte di un'ondata crescente di blockchain di nuova generazione Layer 1 che non competono solo sulla velocità, ma anche sull'usabilità. Mentre l'era iniziale della crypto si concentrava fortemente sull'ideologia e sulla sperimentazione, la nuova era è plasmata da una semplice realtà: l'adozione di massa richiede esperienze fluide. Le persone non vogliono pensare al gas, alle conferme, ai ponti o a passaggi complessi del portafoglio. Vogliono prodotti blockchain che siano veloci, accessibili e naturali da usare. La Vanar Chain sta nascendo attorno a questa idea, posizionandosi come una rete ad alte prestazioni progettata per l'attività Web3 del mondo reale.

Vanar Chain is quietly positioning itself as one of the more practical blockchain projects in a market that often overpromises and underdelivers. While many networks compete for attention with complicated narratives, Vanar focuses on something far more important: making blockchain usable for everyday applications. It’s built with a clear goal—deliver fast performance, low transaction costs, and an experience that feels smooth enough for gaming, entertainment, digital ownership, and mainstream consumer products. In a world where users leave the moment something feels slow or expensive, that focus matters.
At its core, Vanar Chain is designed for scalability. It aims to handle high transaction volumes without turning simple actions into costly events. This is a major challenge across the blockchain space because the moment a network becomes popular, congestion increases, and fees rise. That problem has repeatedly slowed adoption for Web3 applications. Vanar approaches the issue by building infrastructure that prioritizes speed and efficiency, giving developers a network where applications can run consistently even when usage grows.
One of the most interesting parts of Vanar Chain is the direction it is targeting. Instead of focusing only on DeFi and trading, Vanar leans into industries where blockchain can become invisible but still powerful—like gaming economies, digital collectibles, creator platforms, and entertainment ecosystems. These areas require something specific: high throughput, near-instant confirmation, and extremely low fees. If a game needs thousands of small transactions per minute, or a marketplace needs frictionless NFT transfers, it can’t afford the delays and costs that many blockchains still struggle with. Vanar’s value is in building a network where those use cases can actually function at scale.

What makes this approach more important is that mainstream users don’t care about blockchain itself. They care about convenience. They want to log in, click a button, earn a reward, trade an item, or unlock a digital experience without needing to understand gas fees or wallet complexities. Vanar Chain appears to be moving toward this consumer-first mindset. Instead of making users adapt to crypto, it aims to make crypto adapt to users. That shift is exactly what Web3 needs if it wants to break beyond the niche crowd.
Vanar Chain also fits into a growing trend in the market: blockchains built for specific experiences rather than general hype. In earlier cycles, the industry believed every chain needed to do everything—DeFi, NFTs, payments, enterprise, gaming, and social apps all at once. Now, the market is becoming more realistic. The strongest networks are the ones that understand their audience and build directly for them. Vanar’s branding and ecosystem direction suggest it’s trying to become a home for digital culture and entertainment-driven Web3, where ownership and interaction happen naturally.
Another reason Vanar Chain is gaining attention is the way it supports builders. A blockchain’s success isn’t just based on technology—it depends on how many developers choose to build on it and how quickly they can launch. A network can be fast, but if it’s difficult to develop on, adoption stays limited. Vanar’s approach seems centered on reducing that friction by supporting an ecosystem that encourages product development, partnerships, and real-world launches. This is where a chain can truly separate itself: not through marketing, but through actual applications that people use.
The long-term potential of Vanar Chain depends on one thing above all—real adoption. The crypto space is full of chains with impressive specs, but the winners are the ones that become daily infrastructure for users and businesses. If Vanar can deliver consistent performance, support strong partnerships, and build an ecosystem where apps feel simple and rewarding, it can become more than just another network. It can become a foundation for digital experiences where blockchain is present, but not overwhelming.
The bigger picture is that Vanar Chain represents a more mature phase of Web3 thinking. It’s not trying to convince the world that blockchain is the future through big statements. It’s trying to prove it through smooth products and real utility. And in today’s market, that approach is not only smarter—it’s necessary.
Vanar Chain may still be early in its journey, but its direction is clear: build for the users, scale for the real world, and create a blockchain environment where digital ownership and interaction feel effortless. That’s how the next wave of adoption will happen—not through hype, but through experiences that actually work.
#Vanar $VANRY

Plasma is one of the most important scaling ideas ever introduced in Ethereum’s history, yet it rarely gets the spotlight today. Before rollups became the headline solution, Plasma offered a clean, ambitious answer to the biggest problem Ethereum faced from the beginning: too many users, too few transactions per second, and fees that explode when demand rises. Plasma wasn’t designed to replace Ethereum. It was designed to protect Ethereum by shifting most activity away from the base layer while still keeping the main chain as the ultimate source of truth.
At its simplest, Plasma is a framework for building “child chains” connected to a parent chain like Ethereum. Instead of executing every transaction directly on Ethereum, users can move assets into a Plasma chain, transact quickly inside it, and rely on Ethereum only when necessary. The child chain handles the heavy lifting—fast transfers, frequent updates, high throughput—while Ethereum acts as the security anchor in the background. This is what makes Plasma feel so ahead of its time: it aimed to scale without sacrificing the base layer’s decentralization.
The key concept behind Plasma is batching. The operator of a Plasma chain processes thousands of transactions off-chain, then periodically posts a compressed summary back to Ethereum. Usually this summary is a cryptographic commitment, such as a Merkle root, that represents the state or transaction history of the Plasma chain. Ethereum doesn’t need to store every single transaction. It only needs to store enough data to verify integrity when disputes arise. That approach dramatically reduces congestion and makes the cost per transaction far lower compared to doing everything on-chain.
But Plasma’s real genius is not just speed—it’s the security model. Plasma assumes that operators can be dishonest. Instead of pretending every actor will behave well, it builds protection directly into the system through what are known as “fraud proofs” and “exit games.” If the Plasma chain operator attempts to cheat, censor, or manipulate the chain’s history, users are not trapped. They can prove wrongdoing and withdraw their funds back to Ethereum. That exit mechanism is Plasma’s signature feature, and it’s the reason Plasma is still worth discussing today.
Exit games work like an emergency escape hatch. When a user wants to leave the Plasma chain, they submit a withdrawal request on Ethereum along with a proof that they own certain funds on the child chain. The system then enters a challenge period. During this window, anyone can contest the exit if they can prove the withdrawal is invalid—for example, if the user already spent those funds or the proof is incorrect. If no valid challenge appears, the withdrawal finalizes and the user safely recovers their assets on Ethereum. This design ensures that even if the child chain is compromised, the user’s funds can still be protected by Ethereum’s base security.
However, Plasma isn’t perfect, and its challenges explain why it faded from mainstream attention. One major issue is user experience. Exit games require waiting periods, proof submissions, and sometimes active monitoring. If users don’t pay attention to what’s happening on the Plasma chain, they may not respond quickly to fraud attempts. That’s why Plasma often relies on “watchers”—services or tools that monitor the chain and alert users when something suspicious happens. While this can work, it introduces friction and complexity, which is always dangerous in a world where users want instant, simple experiences.
Another limitation is that Plasma is not naturally optimized for complex smart contracts. Early Plasma designs worked best for payments and simple transfers. When DeFi and composable smart contract ecosystems exploded, Plasma struggled to offer the same flexibility that rollups provide today. Rollups can support broader computation while maintaining clearer security guarantees and easier developer integration. This shift made Plasma look less relevant in a world chasing fully programmable scaling.
Still, Plasma remains extremely valuable for certain use cases. It can be highly effective for high-frequency transfers, gaming economies, NFT movements, and microtransactions where cost and speed matter more than complex on-chain logic. In these environments, Plasma’s approach—cheap off-chain execution with Ethereum-level safety in the background—still makes perfect sense. It’s not outdated. It’s specialized.
What makes Plasma even more important is its influence. Even if the industry moved toward rollups, Plasma helped shape how Ethereum developers think about scaling. It introduced the idea that the base layer doesn’t need to verify everything in real time. Instead, it can act as a final settlement and dispute resolution layer. That mindset is now everywhere in modern Ethereum scaling, even if the branding has changed.
In the end, Plasma is a reminder that scalability is not just about faster transactions and lower fees. It’s about building systems where users remain in control, even in worst-case scenarios. Plasma may not dominate the conversation today, but its philosophy is timeless: move fast off-chain, but always keep a secure path back home..
#Plasma $XPL

La visione originale per Plasma era niente meno che poesia architettonica: un albero frattale di blockchain dove le "chain figlie" potevano generare le proprie "chain nipoti", teoricamente scalando Ethereum a miliardi di utenti. In questo modello, la catena principale di Ethereum agisce come una corte suprema—raramente infastidita da trivialità quotidiane ma sempre disponibile a risolvere dispute. Delegando il lavoro pesante dell'esecuzione delle transazioni a questi livelli secondari e ancorando solo "istantanee" crittografiche periodiche alla radice, Plasma mirava a trasformare un'autostrada digitale congestionata in un sistema di transito multi-livello.

Nel panorama del 2026, la distinzione tra "contratti intelligenti" e "intelligenza artificiale" ha iniziato a sfumare, e al centro di questa convergenza si trova Vanar ($VANRY ). Originariamente conosciuto come Terra Virtua, un pioniere nello spazio NFT e metaverso, Vanar ha subito una metamorfosi radicale per diventare una blockchain Layer 1 specializzata. Oggi, non si presenta solo come un libro mastro per le transazioni, ma come un'infrastruttura sofisticata nativa dell'IA progettata per alimentare l' "Economia dell'Intelligenza."
Per comprendere il significato di Vanar, è necessario guardare oltre il clamore dei progetti crittografici tipici e nella sua architettura modulare unica, specificamente progettata per risolvere i due maggiori colli di bottiglia in Web3: i costi di archiviazione dei dati e la mancanza di ragionamento on-chain.

In the current landscape of 2026, the blockchain industry has reached a pivotal realization: for digital assets to achieve mass adoption, they must become invisible. Users do not want to calculate "gas" or manage multiple tokens just to send a payment. Plasma (XPL) has emerged as the definitive solution to this friction, serving as a stablecoin-native Layer 1 (L1) designed to make global money movement as simple as sending a text message.
A Protocol Built for the Stablecoin Era
While general-purpose blockchains like Ethereum and Solana attempt to serve everything from NFTs to complex DeFi, Plasma is hyper-focused on payments. It recognizes that stablecoins—specifically USDT—are the "killer app" of crypto.
The network’s core innovation is its Stablecoin-Native Design. Unlike other chains where stablecoins are secondary assets, Plasma integrates them at the protocol level. This allows for a "gasless" user experience that removes the biggest hurdle in Web3: the need to hold a native volatile token to pay for transaction fees.
The Technical Edge: PlasmaBFT and Bitcoin Security
Plasma’s performance is underpinned by PlasmaBFT, a high-performance consensus mechanism derived from the Fast HotStuff protocol. This system is engineered for:
Sub-Second Finality: Transactions are confirmed in under one second, meeting the speed requirements of retail point-of-sale systems.
High Throughput: The network comfortably handles over 1,000 Transactions Per Second (TPS), rivaling traditional payment processors like Visa.
What sets Plasma apart from other high-speed chains is its Bitcoin-Anchored Security. Plasma operates as a Bitcoin sidechain, periodically "checkpointing" its state to the Bitcoin blockchain. This provides an additional layer of immutable security, ensuring that while the network is fast enough for daily coffee purchases, it is secure enough for institutional-grade settlements.
Zero-Fee USDT: The "Paymaster" Revolution
The most talked-about feature of the Plasma ecosystem is its Zero-Fee USDT transfers. This is achieved through a decentralized Paymaster System. How it works: When a user sends USDT, the protocol-level paymaster automatically "sponsors" the transaction fee. The network effectively internalizes the cost of these transfers, allowing users to move digital dollars across the globe with $0.00 gas fees.
This feature is a direct challenge to established networks like Tron and Ethereum. For the average user in Southeast Asia or South America using the Plasma One wallet, the experience feels like a traditional fintech app (like Venmo or PayPal) but with the transparency and global reach of a blockchain.
2026: The Year of Scaling and Value
As of January 2026, Plasma has moved from "theoretical potential" to "production-grade infrastructure." The network has seen significant growth in key regions:
* Middle East & Southeast Asia: Strategic partnerships with local payment gateways have enabled crypto-linked debit cards that use Plasma for real-time settlement.
* DeFi Integration: With over $2 billion in daily USDT volume, Plasma has become the second-largest market for protocols like Aave, proving that "liquidity follows efficiency."
* EVM Compatibility: Because Plasma is fully EVM-compatible (built on the high-performance Reth engine), developers have seamlessly ported Ethereum-based dApps to the network, enjoying the speed of a sidechain with the familiar tools of the Ethereum ecosystem.
Tokenomics: The Role of $XPL
The $XPL token serves as the economic backbone of the network. While USDT transfers are free for the end-user, $XPL remains vital for:
* Staking: Validators stake $XPL to secure the network and earn rewards.
* Governance: Holders vote on inflation rates, fee structures, and ecosystem grants.
* Complex Execution: While simple payments are gas-free, complex smart contract interactions (like minting RWAs or complex swaps) utilize XpL or processing power.
With a major token unlock scheduled for July 2026, the ecosystem is currently focused on "Value Accumulation"—turning its massive user base into long-term network participants.
Conclusion
Plasma (XPL) is not just another Layer 1; it is a specialized settlement layer for the internet’s dollar. By eliminating gas friction and anchoring itself to Bitcoin's security, it provides the bridge the world needs to move from speculative trading to a functional global economy.
#Plasma $XPL

Nel paesaggio in rapida evoluzione del Web3, la conversazione è passata oltre le semplici velocità di transazione. Mentre navighiamo nel 2026, l'industria richiede infrastrutture "intelligenti": blockchain che non si limitano a registrare dati, ma li comprendono. Vanar Chain è emersa come la leader in questa evoluzione, posizionandosi come un ecosistema Layer 1 (L1) a emissioni di carbonio zero, specificamente progettato per i settori dell'intrattenimento, del gioco e delle imprese tradizionali.
La Filosofia Centrale: Infrastruttura AI-Nativa

Before rollups became the dominant narrative in Ethereum scaling, Plasma stood as one of the ecosystem’s most ambitious ideas. Proposed in 2017 by Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon, Plasma was not just a technical solution—it was a conceptual leap. It introduced a framework for building scalable blockchain systems while preserving Ethereum’s core promise: decentralized security anchored to a robust base layer.
At its heart, Plasma was designed to solve a fundamental limitation of early blockchains—throughput. Ethereum’s base layer, while highly secure, was never intended to process thousands of transactions per second. Plasma addressed this by introducing child chains, separate blockchains that operate independently but periodically commit their state back to Ethereum. This architecture allowed computation and storage to move off-chain while Ethereum remained the ultimate court of arbitration.
Child Chains and Hierarchical Scaling
One of Plasma’s most powerful ideas was hierarchical scaling. Instead of a single off-chain environment, Plasma chains could spawn additional child chains, forming a tree-like structure. Each child chain inherited security from its parent, while Ethereum sat at the root. This design allowed theoretically massive scalability without congesting the main network.
Transactions on Plasma chains were fast and inexpensive because they did not require immediate validation on Ethereum. Only cryptographic commitments—Merkle roots representing batches of transactions—were submitted to the main chain. This reduced on-chain data requirements dramatically, a concept that would later become foundational to rollups.
Fraud Proofs: A Lasting Contribution
Perhaps Plasma’s most enduring contribution is the introduction of fraud proofs. Plasma assumed that operators might behave dishonestly, so it empowered users to challenge invalid state transitions. If a malicious transaction was detected, users could submit proof to Ethereum and trigger penalties or chain exits.
This “optimistic” assumption—that activity is valid unless proven otherwise—was revolutionary at the time. Today, fraud proofs are a cornerstone of Optimistic Rollups, demonstrating how Plasma’s ideas continue to shape modern Layer-2 systems.
Exit Games and User Sovereignty
Plasma placed strong emphasis on user custody and safety. Users retained the ability to exit a Plasma chain back to Ethereum at any time by presenting cryptographic proof of ownership. These mechanisms, known as exit games, ensured that users were never fully dependent on the honesty or uptime of Plasma operators.
While exit games were complex and sometimes slow, they represented a serious attempt to solve one of blockchain’s hardest problems: how to allow off-chain scaling without sacrificing trustlessness. Plasma made it clear that scalability should never come at the cost of user sovereignty.
Limitations That Informed the Next Generation
Despite its groundbreaking design, Plasma faced real challenges. The complexity of exit games made user experience difficult. Data availability—ensuring users could always access transaction data—was another unresolved issue. Additionally, Plasma was better suited for payments and simple transfers than for general-purpose smart contracts.
However, these limitations were not failures. They became lessons. Rollups emerged by directly addressing Plasma’s weaknesses—improving data availability, simplifying exits, and enabling full smart contract support—while retaining its core principles.
Plasma’s Influence on Modern Scaling
Plasma’s true legacy lies in its influence. Concepts like off-chain execution, on-chain settlement, Merkle commitments, and fraud proofs all trace their roots back to Plasma research. Modern Layer-2 solutions such as Optimism, Arbitrum, and even zk-based systems build upon the same foundational insight: Ethereum should be the security layer, not the execution bottleneck.
In many ways, Plasma changed how developers think about blockchain architecture. It shifted the conversation from “How do we scale the base layer?” to “How do we build systems around it?” That shift now defines Ethereum’s roadmap.
A Vision Ahead of Its Time
Plasma may no longer be the headline scaling solution, but its importance cannot be overstated. It was a visionary framework that explored the boundaries of what decentralized systems could become. By daring to separate execution from security, Plasma paved the way for the modular blockchain .
#Plasma $XPL