SA - TEAM MATRIX

Programmable storage is becoming an important part of Web3 because people need storage that is not just affordable, but also smart. This kind of storage has to be able to work with contracts and users right away. There are a lot of companies trying to do this and they all say they can do things like make it bigger make it more flexible or make it cheaper.. What makes @Walrus 🦭/acc stand out is that it works really well with Suis own tools and the people, behind Walrus are always trying to make it work better and faster. They want to make sure Walrus is the best it can be and that is what keeps it ahead of the others in Web3.

Walrus is different, from storage networks because it was made to work perfectly with Sui from the very beginning. This means that developers can use storage like it is a part of the system not something that is added on later. With Sui and its Move logic Walrus lets developers control who can access the storage read it only when certain conditions are met and make rules that're specific to each application. All of this happens right where the storage is so it is fast and safe. Other platforms often need software or coordination outside of the chain to do similar things, which can slow things down make them more complicated and create security risks. Walrus and Sui work together seamlessly making storage a first class resource that developers can program and use easily.
Walrus is really good at storing things. It does a job of handling a lot of data at the same time. Walrus is designed to store chunks of data without using too much extra space. It does this by using codes and putting the data in the right place. This way Walrus can make sure the data is safe, without costing much. So Walrus can give you the good performance even when you have a lot of data. Some other companies might say they have storage but they often have problems when you use it a lot. They might get slower. Cost more to run. Walrus does not have these problems.
The Sui native tooling is really helpful for developers. It makes things go faster. The Walrus tool works perfectly with Sui wallets and other tools. This means that people who are building things can get their ideas out there quickly. When you are building an application you can use storage operations in your workflow. This makes it easier to build things like documents that lots of people can work on together or platforms for media that are decentralized or games that have a lot of data.
For people who are developing the Sui native tooling is great because it is all in one place. This means that developers do not have to think about a lot of things at once and they can see how things are working really quickly. This is an advantage over other storage solutions that are all over the place and work with multiple chains. The Sui native tooling and the Sui native tooling make things easier, for developers.
So Walrus has another edge. This is because Walrus supports ways for people to participate. Walrus does this by allowing people to use read services and light clients and by giving people roles that do not need to stake. This means Walrus can have people involved in its ecosystem not just the people who run nodes. This is good because it gets people participating in the network and it still keeps everything secure. Many other newer systems are still trying to figure out how to do this. They have not shown that it works when you have a lot of people using it. Walrus supports participation models and this is a big deal.
As the programmable storage race intensifies success will depend less on marketing claims and more on real world efficiency integration and developer experience. Walrus positions itself not just as a storage layer but as an extension of the Sui execution environment. By combining Sui native programmability with carefully engineered efficiency gains Walrus is well equipped to stay ahead of emerging competitors and remain a foundational component of next generation decentralized applications.
#Walrus #Camping
$WAL
$BNB

Come integra Vanar Chain architetture energeticamente efficienti e strategie di neutralità carbonica nel suo design fondamentale, garantendo al contempo prestazioni blockchain scalabili e sicure?
Le persone iniziano a pensare che le reti blockchain dovrebbero utilizzare energia e non danneggiare l'ambiente. Il @Vanarchain sta prendendo sul serio questo. Si stanno assicurando che la loro rete blockchain utilizzi energia sin dall'inizio, non solo come qualcosa da considerare in seguito. La Vanar Chain ha un design composto da molte parti, che è chiamato un design modulare Layer 1. Hanno anche un piano, per le persone che aiutano a mantenere la rete sicura, che si chiama strategia di validazione. La Vanar Chain sta cercando di utilizzare energia pur assicurandosi che la rete sia sicura, veloce e possa gestire molte persone che la utilizzano. La Vanar Chain è veramente focalizzata sull'efficienza energetica e sulla neutralità carbonica. Stanno costruendo l'intera rete attorno a queste idee.

The @Plasma journey is really something. It went from a sale of three hundred seventy three million dollars to a live mainnet. This is a deal in the world of blockchain fundraising. A lot of people got involved, which shows that people have faith in the market. It also shows that people are starting to think about how they invest in networks that focus on infrastructure.
Plasma did something with its sale. Of trying to make a quick profit it focused on being useful in the long term and being ready for developers to use. This approach really worked. It made sense to builders, institutions and people in the community. The Plasma sale was, about long term utility and performance and that is what people liked about it. The Plasma journey is an example of this.

The fact that many people wanted to invest in Plasma was a sign that people really needed something better than what they had. Plasma had an idea that made sense. It wanted to make things work faster and be more flexible with money. People who invested in Plasma were not just buying a token they were supporting a system that was made for projects that needed to handle a lot of things at the same time and for projects that needed to work with the real world. This made Plasma special because it was clear what it was trying to do and that was not the case with other projects that were trying to raise money at the same time. Plasma stood out because it was different, from all the projects.
The fundraising phase was really important. It was closely tied to the technical milestones of the Plasma project. When the Plasma project got money they made sure to give updates on how the validator architecture and execution layer optimization were going, as well as the progress on tooling. This helped people feel more certain about what was happening and trust the Plasma project more. Of waiting the Plasma project used the money they got to move faster on things like audits getting people to participate in the testnet and getting more people involved in the ecosystem. The people building on the Plasma project got to see the documentation and test environments which meant that the money they got could be used to get the network ready to use. This was a deal, for the Plasma project and it helped them make progress.
As Plasma moved toward the mainnet things started to change. The story was not about how money they raised anymore. It was about how they could get things done. They had to make sure that validators were set up in a way that balanced being independent with making sure the network worked well. They tested the parts of Plasma to see how they would work when a lot of people were using it. They also set up a system for the community to help make decisions on. This allowed people who had a stake in Plasma to have a say in things like fees and how the network would be updated before it even launched. This helped to close the gap, between people who owned Plasma tokens and the people who actually ran the network, Plasma.
The mainnet launch was a deal because it showed that the people, behind it could actually do what they said they would do. The applications that had been waiting for Plasma to launch were ready to go soon as it did. This meant that the people who had invested in it were right to do. Their money was not just sitting there it was being used to make sure transactions were safe and to help the applications and the people who made the network work. The network was working the way it was supposed to from the beginning with people using it and finding it useful. The mainnet launch of Plasma was a success because it had people using it. It was doing what it was meant to do.
Plasma fundraising journey demonstrates how modern blockchain projects can bridge the gap between capital formation and real deployment. Oversubscription alone is no longer the end goal. What matters is how effectively that capital is transformed into resilient infrastructure and active ecosystems. Plasma path from sale to mainnet offers a blueprint for future networks seeking sustainable growth grounded in delivery rather than hype.
#plasma #Camping
$XPL
$BNB

As @Walrus 🦭/acc grows into a part of storing data and files the way people participate in it is changing. It is moving away, from the ways of staking and running a full node. Now Walrus is looking at clients and read services as the next step. This will let more people help out get rewards and keep the network running without having to deal with the hassle of running validators or storage nodes. This change is happening because the whole industry is moving towards making things more accessible. People can contribute in ways not just by putting in money but also by making things useful and easy to access for Walrus.
The Light clients in Walrus are made to check that the data is available and that it is correct. They do this without having to download or store all of the data. The Light clients in Walrus use codes and ways of checking to make sure the data is real and can be gotten when it is needed. This means that people who use the Light clients in Walrus do not need a lot of space on their devices or a lot of bandwidth to use them. This makes it possible for people to use the Light clients in Walrus on their phones or in their web browsers. The Light clients in Walrus also make the whole network safer. When there are a lot of Light clients in Walrus it is harder for someone to hide or change the data. The Light clients, in Walrus help keep the data safe by checking it and making sure it is available.
When you use services that are built on this foundation they make it easier to get to the data you need. This is because these services do a job of controlling how people access the data. Normally every application would have to go to the storage nodes to get what it needs.. With these specialized services they can get what they need, like blobs, proofs and metadata really efficiently.
These services are good at storing things in a way that makes sense so people in places can get to them quickly and they do not have to wait a long time. This makes it better for people who are building things with Walrus and for the people who are using those things.
The good thing about these services is that you do not have to put up a lot of money or promise to store things for a time. This makes them a good choice for operators and people who provide infrastructure. Read services are really useful, for these people because they do not require a lot of capital to get started. Read services make it possible for people to provide a service without having to spend a lot of money.
The idea of giving rewards without needing to stake is really important here. People who use clients can get small rewards for helping with things like checking if something is available passing on proofs or giving information that makes the network work better. Services that help people read things can get paid based on how they are used, like how much bandwidth they serve how reliable their responses are and how close they are, to the people using them. This makes a circle where rewards are given based on how useful something is, not just because someone has a lot of money locked up in the non-staking reward mechanisms. The non-staking reward mechanisms are what make this work.
For people who make apps these ways of participating make things easier. Users can help the network by running a simple version of the client in an app or wallet. This means that the things people do every day can help the network without them even realizing it. Big companies and data platforms can use services to make sure everything runs smoothly and quickly. At the time they can still follow the rules that Walrus has set up to make sure everything is fair and decentralized. This is good for Walrus and, for the companies and data platforms that use it.
In the long term, light clients and read services position Walrus as an accessible and resilient data layer. By decoupling contribution from staking and heavy infrastructure, Walrus enables millions of users to participate meaningfully. This broader participation base not only improves decentralization but also establishes a sustainable economic model where value flows to all contributors who help keep data available, verifiable, and usable at scale.
#Walrus #Camping
$WAL
$XPL

@Dusk journey in zero-knowledge proof innovation is a story of being patient and doing a lot of research. They really focused on making sure zero-knowledge proofs are useful in the world.Many blockchain projects tried to add privacy features as an afterthought.. Dusk did things differently. They started by doing a lot of research. For Dusk zero-knowledge proofs are not a feature they are the foundation of their architecture.This approach helped the Dusk network develop its design before it was used for big projects. Dusks zero-knowledge proof innovation is, about taking the time to get things right.
Dusk did a lot of research on how to make zero knowledge systems work well. They wanted to make sure these systems could be used in places with a lot of rules like banks and other big institutions. The team at Dusk looked for ways to keep things but also make sure they could follow the rules when they needed to. They wanted to make sure that people could keep their transactions private. Still be able to show what they did if someone asked. This helped them make proof systems that could show only certain information, which is really important for banks and companies that deal with real world assets, like houses or stocks. Dusk worked on zero knowledge systems that could support these kinds of environments.

Dusk is trying to make zero knowledge proofs easier for developers to use. When Dusk moved from research to engineering Dusk wanted to make zero knowledge proofs accessible to developers. Of making developers learn completely new ways of doing things the Dusk network used tools and frameworks for smart contracts that developers were already familiar with. This made it easier for developers to use because it hid the cryptography parts. For example with environments like Rusk developers can write code that keeps peoples information private without having to be experts, in cryptography. This makes it easier for people to try things with zero knowledge proofs and it is simpler for new developers to get started with Dusk and zero knowledge proofs.
The launch of DuskEVM was a deal. It helped DuskEVM make a difference. DuskEVM supported Solidity compatibility and zero knowledge features at the same time. This meant DuskEVM connected cryptography and mainstream decentralized finance development.Developers could use DuskEVM to deploy contracts using languages they already knew. At the time they got privacy guarantees from DuskEVM.
This made zero knowledge proofs seem like something that could be used every day. Zero knowledge proofs were not an idea that people were trying out. They were a tool that people could use for everyday applications, like DuskEVM.Dusk is changing in a way. It used to be about keeping things private. Now it is about being part of a bigger system.
Dusk uses something called zero knowledge proofs. These proofs are used in parts of Dusk like when people agree on things and when assets are made.This helps people move assets around without others knowing. It also helps with staking and financial things that follow the rules.The good thing, about Dusk is that it keeps things in a consistent way not just in some parts. This means that privacy is a part of the system not just something that is added on sometimes.
From research papers to live infrastructure Dusk’s journey demonstrates that zero knowledge innovation succeeds when theory is paired with usability. By grounding cryptographic advances in developer friendly tools and real world regulatory needs Dusk has moved zero knowledge proofs from the lab into production environments. As privacy becomes a core requirement for institutional blockchain adoption Dusk stands as an example of how long term research can translate into scalable and practical decentralized systems.
#Dusk #Camping
$DUSK
$ETH

The @Walrus 🦭/acc ecosystem started the year 2026 looking really mature. It began as a test for a kind of storage that people can use without a central control. Now it is a network that many people use. The Walrus ecosystem is supporting than 120 active projects. These projects are about things like infrastructure and DeFi and gaming and artificial intelligence and services for companies to store their data. The growth of the Walrus ecosystem is not about how many teams are building things on the Walrus ecosystem. It is, about the fact that people are actually using the Walrus ecosystem and we can see that it is being used a lot. This shows that the Walrus ecosystem is becoming something that regular people are using.
One thing that really stands out is how much the storage volume is growing. From 2025 to early 2026 Walrus saw a steady increase in the amount of blob storage being used on the network. This is happening because more and more applications are moving out of the testing phase and into use. Things, like media dApps and collaborative tools and data availability layers are storing bigger and bigger datasets for longer periods of time. This shows that people trust Walrus to be reliable and to cost what they expect. What is really important is that this growth is happening on its own not because of special incentives. This means that developers think Walrus is a way to store things in a decentralized way and that it will save them money. Walrus storage growth is a deal and it is driven by real needs, not just incentives. The growth of Walrus storage volume is an indicator of its success.

The Walrus system has a lot of connections that help us see how well the whole ecosystem is working. Walrus is connected to different networks like Layer 1 and Layer 2 and it also works with special tools that make it easier for developers to access big chunks of data.
These connections make things easier, for people who are building applications because they can use Walrus like it is a part of their system not just something extra. The tools that help people make wallets and the standard ways that computers talk to each other have made it simpler for teams to get their work done faster. This means more applications are using Walrus as a part of what they do. Walrus is a part of many applications now. By the start of 2026 a lot of projects are no just trying out Walrus. They are actually making products that need Walrus to work. These products cannot function without Walrus.
People are moving to Walrus. That shows a big change. More and more people are using Walrus for things, not just for testing. Some apps that help people work together share information and host artificial intelligence data are using Walrus. The people using these apps might not even know that Walrus is working behind the scenes. This is a deal because it is similar to how people started using cloud storage without knowing how it works. Walrus is doing the thing for apps that are not controlled by one company. Walrus is becoming the backbone for these kinds of apps. The fact that people are using Walrus without knowing it is a sign that it is becoming a part of the way we use the internet. Walrus is really important, for applications.
When we talk about networks one important thing to consider is how stable they are when they get bigger. The way Walrus handles changes and fixes problems on its own along with tools for the people running it means it can handle more work without slowing down. This means Walrus is very reliable and that makes companies and people who build things for the term trust it. They need to know it will work well all the time before they put valuable data on it. Walrus network stability is really important, for these companies and builders.
Taken together these metrics tell a coherent story. Walrus has moved beyond the early builder phase into an adoption driven growth cycle. Storage volume is rising integrations are deepening and users are migrating through real applications. In early 2026 Walrus is no longer just part of the Web3 storage conversation it is becoming a foundational layer for mainstream decentralized products.
#Walrus #Camping #leaderboard
$WAL
$BNB

L'Unione Europea ha creato il Regime Pilota DLT, noto anche come DLTR, per trovare una risposta a una domanda importante. Questa domanda riguarda i mercati dei capitali e come l'Unione Europea può utilizzare la blockchain per strumenti che sono regolamentati senza violare le leggi e le norme già in vigore.
@Dusk La rete è molto in linea con questo obiettivo. È come una fondazione che è stata creata per aiutare con le transazioni sulla blockchain, in un modo che segue tutte le regole. Il modo in cui è costruita la Dusk Network consente alle persone di provare cose con titoli reali pur essendo comunque sorvegliati dai regolatori. Al tempo stesso, mantiene le informazioni private al sicuro e si assicura che i mercati funzionino in modo equo. La Dusk Network e il Regime Pilota DLT si concentrano sull'assicurarsi che blockchain e strumenti finanziari, come quelli utilizzati nei mercati dei capitali, possano funzionare insieme.

@Plasma made a decision to build its execution layer on Reth. This was on purpose. They wanted to get from the performance constraints that have been a problem for traditional EVM chains for a long time. Most EVM networks use clients that were made a time ago and have been updated a little bit at a time from old Ethereum designs.. Plasma is using a new execution engine that is based on Rust and it is fast and easy to change and scale in a predictable way. This change in the way Plasma is built gives it an advantage when it comes to performance and it still works perfectly with EVM for developers. Plasma is still fully compatible with EVM which's good, for developers who use Plasma.

The core of Plasma is made up of Reth, which's a high-performance Ethereum client that is written in Rust. Reth is different from versions because it is designed to handle things in parallel manage memory in a smart way and has parts that can be improved on their own. This means that Plasma can handle transactions quickly and consistently even when it is very busy. Older Ethereum chains often have problems because they only use one path to execute things and they make assumptions, about how to handle data. Plasma does not have many of these problems because it started with a clean and fast codebase. Plasma uses Reth to avoid these issues and to make sure that it can handle a lot of transactions at the time.
One big benefit of Plasma is the way it brings Reth into its system. The part that does the work is separate from the parts that make sure everyone agrees and that things get settled. This makes it so Plasma can make each part better on its own without having to change everything at the time. A lot of EVM chains are connected in a way that makes it hard to change one thing without messing with the whole thing. This can make the network less safe. Take a long time to upgrade. Plasma does things differently which means it can try things faster and make changes more safely over time. Plasma is really good, at making Reth work well in its system.
Reth is really good at making it easier to get to the state and process transactions. It does this by using database layouts and caching strategies. This is what Plasma does. It reduces the time it takes to read and write to the state. This is a problem for old EVM networks. When you can get to the state faster it means that things can happen a lot quicker. There is also less waiting for things to happen.. The gas behavior is more predictable, for applications. For people who make things like developers this means that smart contracts work better. They work better even when the network is being used a lot. Reth and Plasma make smart contracts more reliable.
From a developer point of view Plasmas Reth-based execution layer gives us performance without making things too different. We can still use Solidity tooling and EVM opcodes and our existing smart contract workflows work fine.
Teams can move their applications to this system or build new ones without having to redo the main parts and they get faster and more stable execution.
Plasmas execution layer is important because it helps us get more people to actually use our applications not just try them out.
This is what Plasmas Reth-based execution layer does for developers it makes Plasmas execution layer a good choice.
In the long term Plasma’s execution strategy positions the network for sustained growth. As demand increases and applications become more complex the efficiency gains from Reth compound over time. Instead of relying on short-term scaling hacks Plasma builds on a modern execution foundation designed for continuous optimization. By rethinking the execution layer itself Plasma demonstrates how next-generation EVM networks can deliver meaningful performance improvements without abandoning the ecosystem that developers already trust.
#plasma #Camping #leaderboard
$XPL
$XRP

How Is Vanar’s Modular L1 Creating the Building Blocks for Mass Adoption?
@Vanarchain Modular Layer 1 is a change in how blockchains are made for people to use in everyday life. Normally all applications have to follow the rules and use the same system.. Vanars Modular Layer 1 is different. It breaks down the layer into smaller parts that can be put together in different ways. This means that developers and companies and people who make things can pick and choose what they need from Vanars Modular Layer 1.. They can still be sure that Vanars Modular Layer 1 is safe and not controlled by one person or group. Vanars Modular Layer 1 is, like a box of blocks that people can use to build what they want.
At the heart of Vanars design is an idea: Vanar separates the different jobs that need to be done. Vanar breaks down these jobs into three parts: consensus, execution, data availability and application logic. By keeping these parts separate Vanar does not have the problems that other systems have.

Vanars execution environments can. Improve on their own. The consensus part of Vanar can stay stable. Work well. The data layers of Vanar can also. Get bigger without causing problems. This way of designing Vanar is very important for applications that a lot of people use. For these applications it is more important that Vanar works well and can be trusted than having new and experimental features. Vanars design is good, for applications where performance is key.
Vanars modular L1 is really good for developers. It makes it easy for them to work with. The fact that it is compatible with EVM means that teams can use the contracts and tools they already have without a lot of trouble. They can also add modules if they need to.
Developers have a lot of options with Vanars L1. They can use the way of doing things for things like DeFi and NFT. They can add special modules for things like gaming and media and applications that use AI.
This makes it easier for developers to get their projects done quickly. It also costs less to try things with Vanars modular L1. Vanars modular L1 is, about giving developers the freedom to choose how they want to work.
Vanar is really good for companies because it is modular. This means companies can be sure that things will work the way they are supposed to. Vanar has parts that help with following rules, like who can do what and how things are done. These parts can be added to Vanar without causing problems for the system.
Companies can do what they need to do to follow the rules and work well. They can still use the shared part of the system that everyone uses. This is important because it helps organizations and well known brands feel comfortable using Web3. Vanar helps these companies balance being open with being in control which's really important, for Web3.
The thing that really matters for Vanar to be widely used is that people have an experience with it. Vanar takes care of this problem at a level. It has a system for fees that can be changed and it can also hide the complicated parts of the blockchain from the people who are using it. This means that when people make transactions with Vanar it can feel like it is happening away and it is easy to understand. This is really important for people who're not good with technology. Vanar also helps by allowing applications to pay the fees, for the users or by using payment methods. This gets rid of one of the problems that stops people from starting to use Vanar.
Vanars modular L1 is made to last. It is designed to be strong and able to handle problems. When new technologies come out Vanars modules can be. Replaced without having to change the entire system. This means Vanars modular L1 can handle rules, new laws and new things that people want. Vanars modular L1 is ready, for the future because it can adapt to standards, new regulatory frameworks and new consumer behaviors. Vanars modular L1 is built to be flexible and to keep working over time.
By treating blockchain infrastructure as a set of composable building blocks Vanar positions itself as a foundation for mass market Web3. It is not just another L1 competing on raw throughput but a flexible platform built to scale with real world demand and evolve alongside the applications it supports.
#Vanar #Camping #leaderboard
$VANRY
$BNB