Latest mining pool hashrate ranking:
🥇 Foundry USA: 21.69%
🥈 AntPool: 16.87%
🥉 SpiderPool: 16.27%
The difference between 2nd and 3rd place is only 0.6 percentage points.
Four months ago, SpiderPool was still outside the top five. After launching NAT dual mining on the same block on April 17, its hashrate rose steadily from around 10% to 16.27%. It even briefly surpassed F2Pool to enter the top three, but now it trails AntPool by just 0.6%.
This isn’t burned through subsidies—it’s voted for one miner at a time, using hashrate.
The NAT distribution alliance (SpiderPool + F2Pool + ViaBTC) has a combined hashrate of 36.76%, exceeding Foundry USA’s 21.69%.
Meanwhile, AntPool, which is under Bitmain, still hasn’t followed up on NAT distribution.
💬 With a 0.6% gap, how long do you think it will take for AntPool to be overtaken by SpiderPool? Let’s chat in the comments.
#bitcoin $dmt-nat
🥇 Foundry USA: 21.69%
🥈 AntPool: 16.87%
🥉 SpiderPool: 16.27%
The difference between 2nd and 3rd place is only 0.6 percentage points.
Four months ago, SpiderPool was still outside the top five. After launching NAT dual mining on the same block on April 17, its hashrate rose steadily from around 10% to 16.27%. It even briefly surpassed F2Pool to enter the top three, but now it trails AntPool by just 0.6%.
This isn’t burned through subsidies—it’s voted for one miner at a time, using hashrate.
The NAT distribution alliance (SpiderPool + F2Pool + ViaBTC) has a combined hashrate of 36.76%, exceeding Foundry USA’s 21.69%.
Meanwhile, AntPool, which is under Bitmain, still hasn’t followed up on NAT distribution.
💬 With a 0.6% gap, how long do you think it will take for AntPool to be overtaken by SpiderPool? Let’s chat in the comments.
#bitcoin $dmt-nat