Most Blockchain projects simply say Quote "we have processed millions of transactions"
That's right .. that's a key achievement but the question is HOW DO USERS KNOW whether those claims are true ? That is the problem!.
The question demands for an answer and the answer is the solution .This is where RAYLS comes in.
Now ..let's break it down
RAYLS through its innovative approach brought in Transparency model and proof of usage framework.But first, let's understand the concept of proof of usage brought by Rayls.

Proof of Usage by Rayls is an approach through which it displays objective data of ecosystem activities.. "Objective" means that they are measurable. It can also be defined as transparency mechanism that captures transaction fee data generated within Rayls Privacy Nodes and Private Networks, then posts verifiable cryptographic proofs to the Rayls Public Chain.
The actual place where Rayls publishes these objective ecosystem metrics such as transaction volumes, network usage statistics, fees generated, and token burn information is THE TRANSPARENCY PORTAL .
The aim is to make network activity observable rather than relying solely on claims without proof.
Rayls does not say .. we have the numbers or we have processed numerous of transactions..and add Trust us ..
No
They actually have a portal where u can see and verify facts and figures.You may be wondering why transparency portal is needed at this stage ...
Here is the fact.
For so long .. Blockchain has a problem which includes where projects claims that they have millions of users, massive adoption, high transaction volumes but if u check closely You will find out that most numbers attached to the claims are inflated, statistics can't be verified.
This shouldn't work this way ..
Proof matters and that's why Rayls transparency portal is the ultimate solution to this problem. The problem are inability of the users to evaluate and verify ecosystem growth, institutions can't get adoption, token holders or users can't even understand the framework and Users may entirely depend on Feeds.
The portal created by Rayls allows users, validators and beyond to understand the framework, network or ecosystem activity, Revenue generation and Ecosystem usage And Fact remains that with this approach
There is connection between Usage, Revenue and tokenomics.
Here is Rayls data so far ..this will help you to understand what proof of usage by Rayls looks like and how Transparency portal presents them to you.
→ $1M+ cumulative revenue generated from Private Chains
→ 4 active Privacy Nodes operated by financial institutions. These nodes are ✅ Nuclea: is a Brazilian financial market infrastructure and clearing house.✅Nimofast: they deal on cross boarder payments and remittance.✅caixa: this is one of the largest Brazils state-owned banks.✅Xp: the Leading Brazilian investment and brokerage firm
→ 38M+ $RLS already burned(actual figure is at 48,247,458.88 $RLS )
Every fee generated by Private Chains contributes back to the network:
→ 50% is used to buy back and permanently burn $RLS
→ 50% supports long-term ecosystem growth
And 10% of the foundations monthly token unlocks
In further breakdown, private chain fees passed back to Rayls foundation amounts a total of $72,000 which is an advantage up to 20% increase. Private Chain allows financial institutions securely transact on-premise using Rayls high-performant blockchain technology, which can further utilise private Rayls Enygma transactions. Fee data from these networks is captured and proven on the Public Chain via Proof of Usage.
To verify figures ...use this on etherscan 👇
0x8C377e6d86285B195CA55d165305156024B246c2
https://transparency.rayls.com/
Public Chain: this is the public, permissionless layer of the Rayls ecosystem which has been live since 30 April 2026 . it is where activity is settled and value is locked.
Public Chain TVL: as currently is at $298,192
Total Public Chain transaction volume: $6,828,318 which is better growth reading +274.2%
Total transaction amounts to 193,529 total
Average Transaction Cost is at $0.00264
Total validators is 7 while total wallets is 1,599
In $RLS: Staked $RLS (% of True Circulating supply which is 1,661,185,076.92 $RLS) is 5.9%
Circulating supply: 2,035,085,873.79 $RLS
True Circulating supply: 1,661,185,076.92 $RLS
Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV): $20,880,572
Number of Holders is at 51,394
Total (same as Max) Supply is at 9,951,752,541.12 $RLS
Total $RLS Staked is 97,302,346.42 $RLS
Official Smart Contracts are as follows
Ethereum:Mainnet: 0xB5F7b021a78f470d31D762C1DDA05ea549904fbd
BNB Chain:BSC: 0x17ea10b6ae4fde59fdbf471bd28ab9710f508816
Rayls: Rayls Chain: 0x07e17E17e17E17e17e17e17E17E17E17E17e17EA
However let's take a look into one project that has claimed tens of millions of users over the years
Pi Network , many users have questioned the gap between this claimed number of users and observable on chain activity. This has raised concerns about transparency around ecosystem growth and metrics. There is no dedicated public transparency dashboard that connects usage, revenue generation, tokenomics and network activity in one place. Another project such as BlockDag has also this particular area of concern because users raised criticism too regarding verifiability of its fundraising and ecosystem claims. Users have raised questions regarding the verifiability of the ecosystem and adoption metrics."
The same way some Defi projects on Ethereum network as of 2025 claimed strong growth and TVL figures but users found out that Some TVL calculations have been criticized for relying on methodologies that can result in double counting or make independent verification difficult.
Furthermore,
Let's say for an instance
If Users can utilise private networks, public chain services and applications built on Rayls .That's practical usage.This brings it down to the ecosystem generating transaction fees and these fees contribute to token Burns according to tokenomics And Then validators gets reward
This becomes a sequence, measurable which makes everything becomes interconnected
Let's take a clear example.Imagine two Restaurants (Resta X and Resta Y)
Resta X claims they have mass number of customers and they are selling off big quantity of food which means they are successful .. without any tangible customer numbers, Revenue figures and number of sales . While Resta Y claims the same thing with an accurate figures and numbers which indicates daily customers , number of customers, monthly revenues and growth statistics..
Which one of them seems to be more trustworthy.
Resta Y right, that's because they provided figures, numbers which aligns with the daily customers and monthly revenue.
One thing interesting pertaining to Blockchain Transparency is that it does not stop at transaction visibility. Economy transparency is also required at the institutional adoption.knowing that a network processing transaction is useful however comprehending whether that activity brings it to sustainable ecosystem growth may even be significant and essential. Proof of usage brings closer measurable adoption. It shifts away the discussion from speculation.. rather than asking whether a project will succeed one day, builders can begin asking whether people are using it today.
Transparency becomes meaningful when people can observe how a network is being used.
@Rayls