@EthioCoinGram delivers the latest on crypto markets, trends, blockchain, ETFs, Web3, and media news — simple, fresh, and made for traders and enthusiasts alike
Here’s the latest on Bitcoin after that recent dip you mentioned.
Right now, Bitcoin’s trading below $65,000. That drop has definitely caught people’s attention, especially since it’s a key psychological level. Over the last day, BTC fell about 4%, maybe a little more, which lines up with what you saw earlier.
So, what’s driving this?
First, there’s a lot of uncertainty out there. Global headlines and shaky economic news have made investors nervous, so a lot of them are pulling back from riskier bets like Bitcoin.
Then you’ve got the big players — the so-called “whales.” Some of them started selling off, and when the price slipped under $65K, that triggered even more forced selling and liquidations. Basically, it became a bit of a domino effect.
Also, a few Bitcoin ETFs are seeing money flow out instead of in. That’s usually a sign that big institutions aren’t feeling as confident in the short term, which puts even more pressure on the price.
Finally, once Bitcoin broke below $65,000, technical traders jumped in. Stop-loss orders kicked in, momentum sellers piled on, and the selling just accelerated.
So, what does this mean if you’re trading?
First off, dropping below $65K shakes people’s nerves. It’s a level a lot of traders watch, so breaking it can make folks second-guess their next move. Analysts are keeping an eye on what happens around $60,000. If Bitcoin can’t hold there, the selling could pick up steam.
Overall, it’s still a pretty wild market. Liquidations are happening, the news cycle is jittery, and short-term volatility is high.
If you want, I can dig into what all this means for where Bitcoin might go next, both short and long term, or take a look at how other major cryptocurrencies are holding up. Just let me know.#BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #Write2Earn @EthioCoinGiram1 $BTC
Japanese researchers just pulled off something pretty cool: they’ve created a new melon that doesn’t turn soft right after it’s picked. The team from NARO and the University of Tsukuba used genome editing to tweak a gene responsible for making ethylene, the hormone that tells fruit to ripen. With this change, the melon stays firm much longer, which helps cut down on spoilage during shipping.
Here’s the clever part. Producers can now ship these melons while they’re still firm, and then, whenever they want, treat them with a special substance that kicks off ripening right before the fruit hits the shelves or lands on someone’s plate. It’s a game-changer, especially for Japanese melons, which are famous for their taste and fetch high prices at home—but usually ripen too fast for long trips overseas.
Right now, exporting these luxury melons (think Crown or Yubari) has been tricky. They’re popular in places like Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan, but getting them there in perfect shape? Not easy. This new tech promises to make exporting way more practical, keeping the fruit in top condition all the way to the customer.
The researchers hope to get this new melon variety on the market in about three years, once it clears the usual registration and testing hurdles. If it all works out, Japan’s prized melons might finally go global—staying just as delicious, no matter how far they travel." #Write2Earn #AnthropicUSGovClash #BlockAILayoffs #JaneStreet10AMDump
#mira $MIRA When AI Makes Stuff Up About Your Crypto Bags: Why Hallucinations Are a Real Risk
“The model said the token was audited.” It wasn’t. Someone still jumped in headfirst.
So here’s the thing—AI hallucination is one of the sneakiest, most underrated dangers in Web3 right now. And if you trade crypto, you’re already exposed. Let’s break down what this actually means, why it’s a real problem, and how you can stay sharp (or even use it to your advantage).
What Even Is AI Hallucination? (Seriously, in Plain English)
AI hallucination is when an AI spits out stuff that’s flat-out wrong, totally made up, or just outdated—but does it with total confidence. In crypto, this shows up as:
Fake partnership news Wrong info about tokenomics Claims about audits that never happened Bogus contract addresses Made-up roadmap milestones Twisted on-chain stats
The worst part? These “facts” sound legit. AI can be super convincing, and that’s what makes it dangerous.
Why Should Crypto Traders Care?
Crypto moves fast. People rely on all sorts of AI-powered tools—news feeds, trading bots, fancy analysis, research helpers. But if just one piece of AI-generated info is wrong, it can light a fuse:
You get fake breakout signals People panic sell or buy into nonsense Traders chase stories that aren’t real Everyone misreads what’s actually happening behind the token
In crypto, hype and FUD move prices. Bad AI data means real people lose real money—fast.
A Real-World Example (This Stuff Actually Happens)
Say an AI tool says: “$XYZ just landed a partnership with Binance.”
Traders go wild. FOMO kicks in. Volume explodes. Price jumps 22% in minutes. Later, everyone realizes—there’s no partnership. Guess who’s stuck holding the bag? The folks who bought in late. @Mira - Trust Layer of AI $MIRA #Mira
AI Hallucination in Crypto: The Risk Nobody Warns You About
@Mira - Trust Layer of AI $MIRA #mira AI is baked into almost everything in crypto now—trading bots, on-chain analytics, token deep-dives, smart contract audits, and even governance calls. Everyone’s hyped about “AI-powered” everything. But here’s the truth nobody likes to admit:
AI can sound 100% sure of itself, even when it’s dead wrong.
That’s what people call an “AI hallucination.” And in crypto, these mistakes can get expensive, fast.
What is AI Hallucination?
Basically, it’s when AI makes stuff up. It spits out fake info, misreads data, or invents sources and numbers. Sometimes it gives you confident, detailed analysis that’s just… not real.
A human analyst might say, “I’m not sure.” AI? It just plows ahead, sounding like it’s got all the answers—even when it doesn’t.
Why AI Hallucination is Extra Risky in Crypto
Crypto moves at lightspeed. It’s volatile, complicated, and the hype machine never stops. Put hallucinating AI into that mix and here’s what you get:
Fake Fundamentals AI can invent partnerships, fake funding rounds, bogus token supply numbers, or roadmap updates that don’t exist. Picture an AI telling you a project’s backed by a giant like Andreessen Horowitz. It’s not. But that rumor alone can spark terrible investment decisions.
Wrong Tokenomics Analysis AI messes up the basics sometimes—circulating supply, FDV vs. market cap, vesting schedules. In microcap tokens, one small error can put your whole position at risk.
False On-Chain Reads AI tools scanning wallets might mislabel exchange wallets, misinterpret whale moves, or mix up internal transfers with real buys. Suddenly, you’ve got a “whale alert” that’s just someone shuffling coins around. Cue the FOMO stampede for nothing.
Misreading Smart Contracts AI auditors might miss big vulnerabilities, flag safe code as dangerous, or even invent risks that aren’t actually there. That’s risky for both builders and investors.
Why AI Hallucinates So Much in Crypto
Crypto is a moving target. Tokens launch every day. Docs are vague or missing. On-chain data needs context, APIs keep breaking, and projects love to exaggerate. AI models trained on last year’s info—or on incomplete data—tend to fill in the blanks, and they don’t always guess right.
How to Protect Yourself
Here’s how to survive in an AI-powered crypto world:
1. Always Check the Source Don’t just take AI at its word. Double-check with the project’s official site, GitHub, the smart contract on Etherscan, and token data on CoinGecko. AI summaries are just the starting point.
2. Double-Check the Numbers If AI spits out, “This token has 120M in circulation,” don’t trust it. Go check. One bad number can kill your edge.
3. Use AI as a Helper, Not a Boss AI is great for breaking down concepts, summarizing whitepapers, or brainstorming. Don’t make it your only advisor. It shouldn’t be your risk manager or your fact-checker-in-chief.
4. Be Wary of Overconfidence Watch for language like “guaranteed returns,” “definitely going to moon,” or “confirmed partnerships” with no proof. Confidence doesn’t mean correctness.
The Big Picture: AI + Crypto = Even Wilder Markets
Crypto already runs on FOMO, hype, and rumors. With hallucinating AI in the mix, misinformation spreads like wildfire. One viral post about a fake BlackRock partnership or a made-up Binance listing can move markets in minutes. AI cranks up the speed and scale of these moves.
The Fix: Make AI Prove It
We don’t need to toss AI out. We need smarter tools—stuff that can cross-check data on-chain, use multiple models to agree on facts, anchor claims to actual blockchain data, and let communities validate AI outputs. The next wave of AI tools in crypto will need to prove their answers, not just predict them.
Final Take
AI hallucination isn’t just some tech quirk in crypto. It multiplies risk. If you’re using AI to trade or invest, treat it like a smart but inexperienced analyst—helpful, quick, but always needs supervision. In crypto, one fake stat can wreck your day. Don’t skip verification. It’s not just smart—it’s survival.
Want this turned into a Binance Square post, a thread, or an infographic? Just say the word.
Anthropic, the company behind the Claude AI model, is locked in a very public showdown with the U.S. Department of Defense. The whole fight centers on whether Anthropic’s AI should be used in military operations—and under what conditions.
The Pentagon wants full access. They’re pushing Anthropic to let their AI systems run for any legal military purpose, even in situations where the company’s usual safety rules wouldn’t apply.
Dario Amodei, Anthropic’s CEO, didn’t hold back. He said the company “cannot in good conscience accede” to those demands. For him, the problem’s clear: agreeing would mean opening the door to things like mass surveillance of Americans or letting weapons pick targets without a human in the loop. Anthropic sees that as both unethical and dangerous.
This kind of public pushback is rare. Most defense contractors just go along with the Pentagon or work things out quietly. Anthropic, though, is taking its stand out in the open, dragging the whole debate into the public eye and the headlines." #Write2Earn #AnthropicUSGovClash #TrumpStateoftheUnion
President Donald Trump just told all federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s AI tech—right away. That’s a big deal, since Anthropic is one of the top American AI companies. The order covers every federal department, and Trump says Anthropic won’t be allowed to hold any government contracts anymore.
Agencies have six months to phase out Anthropic’s products. The Pentagon, in particular, has to find replacements for anything it’s already using. Trump posted about the move on Truth Social, saying it’s about national security and making sure the White House stays in control of how the military uses AI.
So, what’s really going on? The fight started when the Pentagon asked Anthropic to drop some of its key safety limits on AI models. Basically, the military wanted to use Anthropic’s tech for any legal purpose—including combat systems. Anthropic said no, arguing they can’t, in good conscience, let their AI be used for autonomous weapons or mass surveillance at home.
Talks fell apart. The Department of Defense then labeled Anthropic a “supply-chain risk.” That’s a tag they usually reserve for companies tied to hostile foreign governments, and it means defense contractors can’t touch Anthropic’s tech.
People in Washington are split. Senator Mark Warner and others say Trump’s move is all about politics, not security, and it could hurt America’s standing in the race for AI leadership. On the other hand, OpenAI and some competitors are backing Anthropic’s decision to stick to its ethical guidelines, especially when it comes to military use.
This whole thing could end up changing how the government works with AI companies. It looks like defense priorities could start outweighing company safety rules. Anthropic’s government contracts—including a $200 million Pentagon deal—are now on the chopping block. The fallout might push other AI firms to rethink the terms they set with government clients, too. #Write2Earn #TrumpStateoftheUnion #BinanceSquareTalks @EthioCoinGiram1
How the Fabric Foundation is Shaping the Future of Robotics
@Fabric Foundation The Fabric Foundation isn’t just dabbling in robotics—it’s helping to steer the whole field in a new direction. Forget the old vision of robots as isolated lab experiments. Fabric is pushing for intelligent machines that work out in the real world—open, socially aware, coordinated, and plugged into our economy. Their approach blends robotics, governance, decentralized computing, and practical deployment, all with the goal of tackling the big headaches that come with putting autonomous systems in our everyday lives.
1. Putting People and Safety First
At its heart, the Fabric Foundation is a nonprofit that cares about how robots and embodied AI actually fit into society. They’re not interested in tech that just lives on a screen. Their focus is on real-world systems—machines that move through our factories, homes, and cities. What sets them apart? They’re obsessed with making sure these robots do what people want, act in predictable ways, and give everyone a chance to participate, not just a handful of giant companies or powerful countries.
Why does this matter? As robots show up everywhere—from warehouses to hospitals to our living rooms—we suddenly have to worry about safety, responsibility, identity, and how these machines work together. The Foundation’s mission is simple: robots should help people, not just function for their own sake.
2. Building the Plumbing for Open, Scalable Robotics
Fabric isn’t just talking big ideas—they’re actually building the nuts and bolts that robots will use to talk, coordinate, and do business worldwide.
One of their main projects is the Fabric Protocol (ROBO). Think of it as a kind of blockchain backbone for robots. Here’s what it does:
- Gives robots digital identities you can verify (since you can’t exactly hand a robot a driver’s license or a credit card). - Lets robots find and organize work on their own, out in the open, instead of relying on a hidden middleman. - Handles payments and settlements on-chain, so robots can get paid for real-world tasks, no fuss.
This is more than just tech for tech’s sake. It’s about creating a machine economy, where robots aren’t just tools—they’re independent actors in an accountable system.
3. Opening the Doors to Everyone
A big part of what Fabric stands for is making sure robotics isn’t just a playground for the tech giants. They want developers, researchers, and organizations everywhere to help build—and benefit from—the robotics ecosystem. Here’s how they’re doing it:
- Creating open standards and easy-to-use tools so anyone, anywhere, can get involved. - Bringing together policymakers, industry leaders, and standards groups to get everyone on the same page. - Supporting research and education to give more people a shot at working with robots.
By making robotics accessible, Fabric helps make sure innovation doesn’t get trapped behind corporate walls or limited to a single country.
4. Setting the Rules—and Making Sure Robots Play by Them
Robots shouldn’t just work—they should work safely, transparently, and in ways that line up with our values. That’s where Fabric’s focus on governance comes in. They’re building the frameworks that:
- Keep robots safe and easy to monitor while they’re out doing real jobs. - Make decision-making clear and accountable. - Protect the public by overseeing robotics infrastructure for the long haul. - Shape the rules and norms so society actually benefits from all this new tech.
Without these guardrails, robots could end up being misused, making decisions in secret, or getting rolled out with no oversight. Fabric’s governance work keeps that in check.
What the Future Looks Like
Put all this together and you get a pretty clear picture: Fabric is pushing for a future where robots are safe, aligned with what people want, able to work together in open networks, recognized as economic players, and accessible to developers and communities everywhere. Instead of robots as isolated gadgets, think of them as part of a big, shared, and well-governed ecosystem.
That’s the leap—from lonely machines to a trusted, integrated, and socially responsible robotics world. If we’re going to trust autonomous agents in our lives, this is the kind of foundation they need.
Curious about what all this means for your field—like manufacturing, healthcare, or logistics? Just say the word, and I’ll dive into the details for you.
#robo $ROBO How the Fabric Foundation Is Shaping the Future of Robotics
The Fabric Foundation isn’t just another name in robotics. It’s out to change the way robots fit into our world—moving past those closed-off lab experiments and into something much bigger. The goal? Open, connected machines that actually make sense in real life, not just in research papers or factory floors. They’re mixing robotics, smart governance, decentralized computing, and practical deployment—pulling together a bunch of worlds that usually don’t talk to each other. All this is aimed at tackling the real headaches that come up when autonomous systems leave the lab and start showing up in everyday places.
At the heart of it, the Fabric Foundation runs as a non-profit. Their focus is on setting up the right rules and tech backbone for robotics and embodied AI—the stuff that moves and acts in the physical world, not just behind a screen. The main idea is simple: keep people in the loop. They push for robots that actually follow what humans want, act in ways we can predict, and let anyone join in—not just a handful of big companies or countries calling the shots. Everything they do centers on a future where robotics grows up with us, not in spite of us. @Fabric Foundation $ROBO #ROBO
Bitcoin Hard Fork to Recover Mt. Gox Funds? What Traders Should Really Watch
Understanding the Proposal and Its Market Impact
Here’s what’s going on: Some people in the crypto world are tossing around the idea of a Bitcoin hard fork to get back the funds lost in the Mt. Gox fiasco. It’s a wild thought. Naturally, traders want to know—can this actually happen, and even if it does, is it good for Bitcoin?
Let’s cut through the noise.
A hard fork basically rewrites the rules for Bitcoin. You end up with a new version of the network, and supporters say this could help bring back the coins that vanished with Mt. Gox in 2014.
But here’s where things get tricky. Bitcoin’s whole reputation rests on the idea that once a transaction is locked in, it’s there for good. Undoing that sets off alarm bells. People trust Bitcoin because it doesn’t change the past, even when it hurts.
Look at history: Whenever exchanges got hacked, or bad stuff happened, the Bitcoin community held the line. They chose to protect the chain’s integrity instead of rolling things back. That’s the culture.
Just talking about a fork can shake things up. You’ll see more short-term price swings. Long-term holders get twitchy. Speculators jump in, hoping for a quick win.
But let’s be real. Unless miners, developers, and regular users all get on board, this fork is going nowhere. The odds are slim.
At the end of the day, the Mt. Gox story still pulls at people, but a real, community-backed fork isn’t likely. For traders, this is mostly about market mood, not actual changes—at least for now.
Don’t get caught up in the hype. Watch what developers are saying and keep an eye on what’s happening on-chain. Don’t let headlines push you into knee-jerk trades. Fundamentals matter more than rumors.
Warner Bros. Discovery hasn’t been fully sold yet, but things are moving fast. The company just agreed, in principle, to be acquired by Paramount Skydance in a massive takeover. Here’s where things stand right now.
First off, both companies’ boards signed off on the deal—unanimous approval. Paramount Skydance is set to buy Warner Bros. Discovery for $31 a share, which pushes the total value of the deal to about $110 billion. They’re aiming to wrap things up by the third quarter of 2026, but it still needs the green light from regulators and shareholders.
Before Paramount came into the picture, Warner Bros. Discovery was actually in talks with Netflix for a similar deal. The board decided Paramount’s offer was better—a “superior proposal”—so they walked away from Netflix. Netflix didn’t try to outbid Paramount, and Paramount paid a $2.8 billion breakup fee to officially end that deal.
Even though the agreement’s signed, Paramount Skydance doesn’t own Warner Bros. Discovery just yet. There’s still a bit of a waiting game while everyone checks the legal and financial boxes. Still, with everyone onboard so far, the sale looks pretty solid.
So what happens if (or more likely when) this goes through? Warner Bros. Discovery will join forces with Paramount’s huge media empire. Think movies, TV networks, streaming platforms, news—pretty much everything under one roof. The combined company would control one of the biggest content libraries out there and reach audiences around the world. Of course, that kind of size attracts a lot of attention from regulators, so expect some scrutiny before it’s all official.#Write2Earn
🤖 Mira vs. Traditional AI Verification: Who Do You Trust? As AI becomes more powerful, one big question keeps popping up: How do we know the AI is actually telling the truth? Let’s break down the difference between Mira and traditional AI verification in a simple, trader-friendly way.
🧠 What Is Traditional AI Verification? Most AI systems today (like ChatGPT-style models) rely on: Internal confidence scores Fine-tuning & human feedback Centralized moderation Single-model outputs For example, models developed by organizations like OpenAI are trained using massive datasets and human reviewers to improve accuracy.
Feature Traditional AI Mira Network Verification Internal confidence External consensus Control Centralized Decentralized Trust Model Trust provider Trust protocol Transparency Limited On-chain records Economic Incentives None Yes Crypto-native ❌ ✅
Denmark just called a general election for March 24, 2026—sooner than it had to. Tensions are running high, especially with the U.S. pushing for more influence in Greenland and worries about Russia stirring the pot in European politics.
Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen isn’t sugarcoating it. She’s telling voters this election is a big deal for Denmark’s security, its independence, and how it fits into Europe going forward.
Denmark’s intelligence services have already warned everyone to watch out for foreign meddling. They’re keeping a close eye on attempts to sway public opinion or mess with the election—especially from the U.S. and Russia. It’s all about protecting Denmark’s democracy. There’s no public proof of actual interference yet, but the security agencies aren’t taking any chances.
So, why does all this matter? It’s not just about Denmark. Greenland’s at the center of the storm. The U.S. has been eyeing more control there, especially since President Trump pushed the idea. Copenhagen—and a lot of Europe—see that as outside interference. Things escalated in 2025 when Denmark called in a U.S. diplomat after reports surfaced about Americans with Washington ties running covert influence campaigns in Greenland.
And it’s not just the U.S. Denmark’s security services have also been watching Russia for years. There’s a history of Russian attempts to meddle in elections in Greenland, using fake accounts and social media to stir up divisions.
All of this is making European leaders nervous. Foreign influence operations are ramping up, and the battle for control in the Arctic and Europe is getting more intense. Denmark’s warnings are just the latest sign that nobody wants their democracy caught in the crossfire of global power games.#Write2Earn #JaneStreet10AMDump #BlockAILayoffs @EthioCoinGiram1
Here’s what’s going on with Trump and the Supreme Court talk:
President Trump just tossed out Senator Ted Cruz’s name as a possible pick for the Supreme Court if there’s ever an opening while he’s in office. He called Cruz a sharp legal mind and even joked, kind of tongue-in-cheek, that Cruz would sail through the Senate with unanimous support if it came to that. Trump brought this up during a speech in D.C., and Cruz was right there in the audience.
Cruz’s response? He said he’s flattered, but it’s a hard no from him. He’s told Trump more than once he doesn’t want a seat on the Supreme Court. Cruz says he’d rather stay in the thick of things in the Senate, fighting over policy, instead of putting on judicial robes. Sure, he called the job a “high honor,” but he made it clear he wants to keep his hands in politics.
Now, to be clear, there isn’t a Supreme Court seat open right now, and none of the justices have said they’re stepping down. So Trump’s comments seem more like political theater or a way to send a message inside his own party, not the first step in an actual nomination.
Why does this matter? Supreme Court picks stick around for decades and shape where the country heads on huge issues — civil rights, what the federal government can do, how much power the president has, all of it. Cruz is a big name among conservatives, went to law school, even clerked for the Court. Trump pointed all that out, even if Cruz doesn’t want the gig.
Let me know if you want a rundown on how Supreme Court nominations actually work, or if you want a quick look at how Cruz thinks about the law and what that could mean for the Court.#TrumpStateoftheUnion #Write2Earrn
Live Nation’s Antitrust Trial: What Traders & Fans Should Know
TL;DR: Live Nation—the powerhouse behind Ticketmaster—is getting dragged into court over antitrust issues. Settlement talks flopped, so it’s going to trial. Here’s what’s at stake for markets, ticket prices, and even the future of Web3 ticketing.
1️⃣ What’s Going On?
Live Nation basically runs the show when it comes to ticketing in the U.S. They control venues and the online ticket game. A lot of people say that’s a problem: less competition, higher prices, and both fans and artists get the short end of the stick. The lawsuit accuses Live Nation of abusing its grip on the market. Settlement talks? Dead. So now it’s up to the courts.
2️⃣ Why Traders Should Pay Attention
Stock Swings: Lawsuits like this can throw $LYV’s price all over the place. Any big ruling could spark a move.
Ripple Effect: Smaller promoters and up-and-coming ticketing platforms might finally get a shot if Live Nation gets reined in.
Web3 Angle: If regulators force more competition, blockchain ticketing could finally take off. Think NFT ticket startups—this could be their moment.
3️⃣ A Closer Look at the Market and Tech Side
Charts & Trends: Keep an eye on LYV’s support and resistance levels. Legal drama usually means big spikes in trading volume.
Startups in the Spotlight: Early-stage ticketing and blockchain projects might see a bump in investor interest if people start looking for alternatives.
A Bit of Imagination: Picture NFT tickets as “unhackable VIP passes” living on-chain—no scalpers, no sneaky fees, totally transparent. That’s the kind of shakeup even lawyers can’t block.
4️⃣ What This Means for Fans
For now, ticket prices probably won’t budge until there’s real competition.
Regulators might break up ticketing and venue ownership, which could finally cut down those annoying fees.
Artists could get more say over ticket pricing in the future.
5️⃣ What Binance Square Traders Should Watch
Legal drama = choppy $LYV trading.
Web3 ticketing startups = possible alpha if adoption takes off.
Stay tuned: Whatever happens in court could reshape both $LYV and the whole live events space.
📌 Social Strategy Ideas
Tag Web3 ticketing projects like @NFTickets, @BlockVenue, @LiveCryptoEvents.
Share a chart showing LYV’s recent price and volume moves.
Use simple graphics to show what ticketing looks like with and without Live Nation’s monopoly.
Title Ideas:
“🎟️ Ticket Wars: Live Nation vs Antitrust Law — What Traders Need to Know”
“NFTs to the Rescue? Live Nation’s Monopoly Faces Court”
Most of the talk about Paradigm trying to raise $1.5 billion actually goes back to late 2021. Back then, they ended up launching a massive $2.5 billion venture fund in November—at the time, it was the biggest crypto-focused fund anyone had ever seen, even topping Andreessen Horowitz’s $2.2 billion.
Since then, Paradigm hasn’t just sat still. They’ve closed a few more funds, smaller than that huge one, but still pretty big by any standard. In June 2024, they raised $850 million for their third fund, which zeroes in on the earliest-stage crypto projects. People were first talking about this round back in April, guessing the target would land between $750 million and $850 million—and that’s basically where it ended up.
Looking back at September 2023, there were reports that Paradigm was aiming for a $1 billion crypto fund then, too.
Just for a bit of background: Paradigm started in 2018, founded by Fred Ehrsam (who helped start Coinbase) and Matt Huang (who used to be a partner at Sequoia)." #Write2Earn @EthioCoinGiram1
Fabric Protocol actually means two very different things in tech and crypto, so it’s easy to get them mixed up. Let’s break them down in plain English.
This is the classic one you’ll hear about in business circles:
Hyperledger Fabric is an open-source blockchain framework meant for companies. It’s permissioned, so only approved members can use it—not just anyone on the internet. The Linux Foundation backs it under their Hyperledger projects.
Some big ideas:
- Permissioned: Only trusted people or organizations can join and do transactions. Not like Bitcoin or Ethereum, where it’s a free-for-all. - Modular: You can swap out parts like consensus, identity, or transaction methods to fit what your business needs. - Smart contracts (they call it “chaincode”): You can write business rules in common programming languages like Go, Java, or Node.js. - Privacy: You get channels—basically private sub-groups—so certain transactions stay confidential between the right parties. - Pluggable consensus: You pick the way your group agrees on transactions. Raft is a popular option, but there are others.
Why use it? Hyperledger Fabric works best for companies that care about privacy, control, and fast, predictable performance. Think supply chains, finance, healthcare, or identity systems. If you don’t want your data on a public blockchain, this is what you’re looking for.
2. Fabric Protocol (Crypto Project) — Synthetic Assets on Solana
Then there’s Fabric Protocol in the crypto world, and it’s totally different.
This Fabric Protocol is a DeFi project built on Solana. The main idea? Let people create and trade synthetic assets—so you can mint, swap, or burn tokens that represent stuff like gold, uranium, or any engineered asset.
How it works:
- You lock up some tokens as collateral in a debt pool. - In return, you mint synthetic assets that track the real-world prices of stuff (using decentralized price feeds called oracles). - You trade these assets directly—no big centralized order book, which helps avoid low liquidity or slippage.
The protocol usually has its own token (like FAB or ROBO) that you use as collateral or for governance. If you want to mint new assets, you need to lock up these tokens.
Heads up: Crypto projects move fast. Things like which assets are supported, token rules, and partners can change all the time. Always check the latest documentation or their Discord/Telegram before you dive in.
Quick Comparison
Feature Hyperledger Fabric Fabric Protocol (Solana) Built for Enterprise/private networks Public DeFi Blockchain Standalone framework Runs on Solana Token Usually none Yes, native token Focus Privacy, business use Synthetic assets & DeFi
Which “Fabric Protocol” do you mean?
If you’re looking into business blockchains, you want Hyperledger Fabric. If you’re curious about trading synthetic assets or DeFi on Solana, you mean the crypto Fabric Protocol. @Fabric Foundation $ROBO #ROBO Let me know which one you want to dive into—I can walk you through either, just tell me if you’re focused on enterprise blockchain or the crypto project.
Mira Network steps in as a decentralized blockchain protocol built to keep AI honest. It checks AI-generated information so you can actually trust what you’re seeing. AI can get things wrong—hallucinate, mess up facts, or show bias. Mira’s here to catch that.
Here’s how it works:
First, Mira takes a big, complicated AI response and breaks it down into bite-sized claims. Like, say an AI says, “Ethereum’s market cap is $200B.” Mira grabs that bit—just the market cap—and treats it as a single claim to check.
Next, Mira sends these claims out to a bunch of independent AI models and nodes scattered across the network. Each node takes a look, double-checks the claim, and reports back on whether it’s true or not.
Then comes the consensus part. Mira pulls together all the results from those nodes. If enough of them agree, the claim gets stamped as verified and locked onto the blockchain. That means nobody can mess with it later—it’s permanent and everyone’s accountable.
There’s a system of rewards too. Nodes that get it right earn rewards. If a node tries to cheat or reports false info, it gets penalized. So, everyone’s got a reason to play fair and keep things accurate." @Mira - Trust Layer of AI $MIRA #Mira
Sony’s shutting down Bluepoint Games, the studio that gave new life to classics like Shadow of the Colossus and Demon’s Souls. It’s all part of a bigger business shakeup.
Before the doors closed, Bluepoint apparently pitched the idea of remaking Bloodborne—the cult hit from 2015. They tossed the concept around, maybe even started some early design work, but Sony never gave them the go-ahead. Word is, the project got tangled up in internal politics between Sony and FromSoftware, and there were worries about whether the remake would really pay off.
Now that Bluepoint’s gone, the hopes for a Bloodborne remake have taken a serious hit. Fans always thought Bluepoint was the obvious choice for the job, and with them out of the picture, it’s hard to see anyone else stepping in soon.
Sony’s also been cracking down on fan-made Bloodborne projects. They’re holding onto those rights tightly, which has only made the community more frustrated.
All in all, the news stings. Bluepoint’s closure, plus no official word on a Bloodborne remake, feels like a double blow to fans and folks in the industry. Even though Bluepoint tried to get the project off the ground, it never happened—and now, with the studio gone, that window has closed. Whether another team will ever take on Bloodborne is anyone’s guess. For now, the future is just up in the air." #Write2Earn #BlockAILayoffs #JaneStreet10AMDump @EthioCoinGiram1
I haven’t seen any recent, credible news from major outlets like Reuters or other international press saying Brazil’s International Affairs Secretary is stepping down to join the World Bank. There’s nothing out there—at least in the latest coverage—about this kind of move in either Brazil’s government or at the World Bank. If you’ve got a specific link or article, send it over. I can help break it down.
Here’s what’s actually in the news about Brazil and international affairs right now:
There’s some coverage about U.S.–Brazil relations and changes in diplomatic staff in Washington. Basically, these shifts could affect how the U.S. handles its Brazil policy.
You’ll also find some commentary about global diplomacy and people moving around in big foreign policy roles, like Tony Blair—though nothing about a Brazilian official heading to the World Bank.
Brazil’s government recently criticized U.S. military actions in Venezuela and has been active at the U.N. on related issues.
Just for context, Brazilians have had roles at the World Bank before. For example, Abraham Weintraub left his executive post at the World Bank in 2022 to run for office in Brazil. But there’s no sign right now of a current Brazilian International Affairs Secretary resigning to take a World Bank position.