فلسطین

The crypto market has always rewarded speed. New narratives emerge quickly, attention shifts rapidly, and projects often feel pressured to constantly reinvent themselves. In this environment, Walrus takes a noticeably different approach. Rather than competing for daily excitement, Walrus positions itself around patience, clarity, and long-term relevance. This choice may appear subtle, but it carries significant weight for an audience that has lived through repeated cycles of hype and correction.
Walrus does not attempt to define itself through bold claims or exaggerated timelines. Instead, it focuses on building a coherent identity that users can understand without effort. This clarity is increasingly valuable. As the market matures, participants are less interested in promises and more interested in direction. Walrus provides that direction by maintaining consistency in its communication and intent.
One of the defining qualities of Walrus is how it treats its audience. It does not assume short attention spans or emotional decision-making. Instead, it communicates with restraint, allowing users to evaluate information at their own pace. This respectful tone creates trust. When users feel they are not being rushed or manipulated, engagement becomes more genuine.
From a broader perspective, Walrus reflects a shift in how crypto projects measure success. Visibility is no longer the sole indicator of relevance. Sustainability, adaptability, and credibility matter just as much. Walrus aligns with these priorities by focusing on infrastructure, participation, and long-term usability rather than short-term metrics.
Another important element is Walrus’ approach to community. Instead of framing users as spectators, it encourages involvement as part of a shared journey. This approach fosters a sense of ownership. When users feel connected to progress rather than outcomes alone, loyalty deepens. Over time, this kind of community becomes a stabilizing force.
Walrus also benefits from its ability to remain flexible without losing identity. Many projects struggle to adapt without confusing their audience. Walrus avoids this by anchoring itself to core principles while remaining open to evolution. This balance is difficult to achieve but essential for long-term relevance.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus #walrus $WAL

For users who have spent years navigating the crypto space, patterns become clear. Hype cycles repeat, narratives shift, and many projects fade as quickly as they appear. Walrus stands out precisely because it does not attempt to break this pattern through force. Instead, it works within it, offering a calmer and more deliberate alternative.
Walrus communicates with a tone that feels familiar to experienced participants. There is no sense of urgency or exaggerated optimism. This measured style signals maturity. It suggests that the project understands the audience it is speaking to—people who value substance over spectacle.
At the core of Walrus is a focus on participation rather than persuasion. It does not push users toward specific outcomes. Instead, it provides a framework where engagement feels optional but meaningful. This approach reduces emotional pressure and encourages rational evaluation.
Relevance in crypto is often short-lived because it is tied to attention. Walrus builds relevance differently. It relies on consistency, allowing its presence to accumulate over time. This slow accumulation creates a stronger foundation. Projects remembered for reliability tend to retain mindshare even during quiet periods.
Walrus also avoids overcomplication. While innovation is important, unnecessary complexity can alienate users. Walrus balances ambition with accessibility, making its vision easier to follow. This accessibility does not dilute its goals; it strengthens them by widening understanding.
From a community perspective, Walrus emphasizes alignment. Incentives, expectations, and communication are structured to reduce friction. When participants feel aligned rather than managed, trust increases. This trust becomes a long-term asset.
Another reason Walrus resonates with experienced users is its acceptance of market reality. It does not pretend volatility can be eliminated. Instead, it focuses on building systems that can withstand it. This realism appeals to users who have learned that resilience matters more than perfection.
Ultimately, Walrus feels familiar because it respects experience. It does not assume ignorance or impulsivity. It assumes discernment. In doing so, it builds a relationship with its audience that is based on mutual understanding rather than persuasion.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus #walrus $WAL

As Web3 continues to evolve, the conversation is shifting from experimentation to infrastructure. This shift changes how projects are evaluated. The focus moves from novelty to reliability, from attention to endurance. Walrus fits naturally into this emerging context.
Infrastructure projects are often understated by design. Their success is measured not by visibility, but by how quietly they support broader systems. Walrus embraces this reality. It does not position itself as a headline-maker, but as a foundational element that can grow alongside the ecosystem.
One of Walrus’ key strengths is its emphasis on stability without rigidity. It acknowledges that change is inevitable but believes that change should be deliberate. This philosophy allows Walrus to adapt while preserving coherence. For the audience, this creates confidence. Users know what Walrus stands for, even as it evolves.
Walrus also reflects an understanding of long-term value creation. Short-term excitement can attract attention, but it rarely builds durable systems. Walrus prioritizes design choices that favor sustainability. This includes thoughtful communication, measured growth, and realistic expectations.
From a relevance standpoint, Walrus benefits from timing. As users become more selective, projects that offer clarity and patience gain appeal. Walrus does not demand constant engagement. Instead, it remains present and reliable. This quiet presence strengthens mindshare over time.
Another important aspect is Walrus’ relationship with its community. Rather than relying on aggressive incentives, it encourages organic participation. This organic growth may be slower, but it tends to be more resilient. Communities built on understanding rather than excitement are better equipped to navigate market shifts.
Walrus also aligns with the broader maturation of Web3. As decentralized systems move closer to real-world integration, the need for stable, understandable infrastructure increases. Walrus positions itself as part of this foundational layer.
In the long run, projects that endure are those that understand their role. Walrus does not attempt to be everything. It focuses on being consistent, adaptable, and relevant. For an audience looking beyond trends, Walrus represents a project designed not just to exist, but to last.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus #walrus $WAL

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has used two
cryptocurrency exchanges registered in the United Kingdom to move approximately
$1 billion since 2023, evading international sanctions, according to a new
analysis from blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs reported by The Washington
Post.

The two exchanges, Zedcex and Zedxion, are essentially the
same operation under different brand names, TRM Labs found. IRGC-linked
transactions accounted for 56% of the exchanges' total volume between 2023 and
2025, with the vast majority conducted in Tether's USDT+0.0046%

 stablecoin on the Tron network.

IRGC-linked activity scaled quickly, growing from $24
million in 2023 to $619 million in 2024 and $410 million in 2025, per the
report. The findings suggest Iran is moving beyond one-off crypto transactions
toward building dedicated financial infrastructure to evade sanctions.

"The $1 billion figure over two years demonstrates that
digital currencies are becoming a financial channel for Iran's shadow banking
apparatus," Miad Maleki, a former US Treasury official who worked on Iran
sanctions efforts, told The Washington Post.

The IRGC is under sweeping US and Western sanctions partly
due to concerns over Iran's nuclear program. It also provides financial support
to Hamas, the Houthis, and Hezbollah, considered by the US to be terrorist
organizations. The Financial Times reported
recently that Iran is looking to accept crypto payments in its sales
of ballistic missiles, warships, and other advanced weapons. 

To trace the exchanges' operations, TRM Labs made small
deposits and withdrawals to unmask their internal wallet infrastructure.
Investigators also followed funds involving 187 wallet addresses that Israeli
authorities designated last year as IRGC-controlled. Among the transactions
identified was a $10 million payment from an IRGC wallet to addresses
controlled by a Yemeni national whom the U.S. Treasury sanctioned in 2021 for
smuggling Iranian fuel to fund the Houthis.

TRM Labs also linked the exchanges to Babak Zanjani, an
Iranian businessman who helped the government evade oil sanctions under
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Zanjani was later convicted of embezzlement and
sentenced to death in Iran, though the sentence was commuted and he was
recently released from prison.

Both exchanges claim on their websites to comply with
anti-money-laundering regulations. Zedcex lists Iran among its prohibited
jurisdictions; Zedxion does not. Neither responded to questions from The
Washington Post. A spokesman for Iran's mission to the United Nations and the
British Treasury's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation also declined
to comment to the publication. 

 

Optimism marks the start of 2026 for those invested in Ethereum. With the Fusaka update going live in December 2025, change has taken root across the network. Instead of claims alone, real shifts are underway - efforts intensify to uphold Ethereum's position amid rising pressure from rivals such as Solana.
Three main factors could influence how ETH trades through late January 2026. These elements may steer movement more than others during this stretch. One follows regulatory updates, another tracks investor positioning, while the third ties to broader market trends.
The "Tsunami Effect" from the Fusaka Upgrade
On December 3, 2025, the Fusaka update arrived - bringing PeerDAS into play while expanding Blob space twofold to either 14 or 21 per block. Transformation of the Layer 2 environment followed closely thereafter.
Transaction costs across Layer 2 platforms including Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base show notable decreases. Approaching twelve thousand transactions per second, system capacity expands steadily.
When big changes happen, prices often take weeks to adjust. Past shifts suggest one to two months are needed before markets absorb updates like The Merge. By early 2026, rising usage of layer-two networks may start limiting available ETH. Demand could tighten as more people hold ether for transaction costs and security deposits. This period might mark the point where pressure builds most clearly.
The "Concrete Wall" of Whales and Institutions
Noteworthy trust among large participants emerges, according to Glassnode figures:
Since late 2024, those with more than 10,000 ETH show a 9.3% rise in holdings - indicating steady buildup. The average entry point for these major holders sits at $3,130, forming a resilient floor driven by market perception.
By early 2026, assets tied to ETH exchange-traded products totaled $18.17 billion - marking a shift from mere speculation toward core portfolio inclusion among large financial institutions. Since then, steady buying pressure through regulated funds has helped dampen sharp price swings while fostering gradual appreciation over time.
Technical Indicators & 2026 Roadmap
A possible Bull Flag formation appears in price models according to CoinMarketCap's weekly chart analysis. While patterns emerge, they do not guarantee future movement. Observation of structure suggests continuity may be shaping up. Time will clarify whether momentum supports the setup. Signals like these often dissolve without follow-through.
Vitalik Buterin advances a streamlined version of Ethereum, drawing sustained interest from investors. Exploration into Parallel EVM unfolds under steady scrutiny. Progress emerges through iterative testing rather than grand announcements. Attention remains fixed on structural refinements. Efficiency gains surface quietly amid ongoing development cycles.
Risks: Facing strong rivalry from Solana - capable of handling 1.2 million transactions per second - creates ongoing challenges. Still, Ethereum holds distinct value by serving as the foundational network for decentralized finance applications.
End of January 2026 Price Prediction
From these figures, one possibility emerges at CoinMinutes. Another takes shape beside it:
Scenario 1: Breakout (65% probability)
Favorable trends persist through sustained ETF inflows, while activity on Layer 2 networks expands after Fusaka's launch. Movement in capital remains aligned with market uptake, though underlying momentum stems from infrastructure shifts. Asset allocation reflects confidence, even as usage patterns evolve across platforms. Growth appears steady, driven by structural improvements rather than isolated events.
By late January 2026, Ethereum may surpass $3,600, moving toward $4,000–$4,200. Should this occur, downward bets tied to skepticism around the upgrade could be forced out. Pressure from rising prices might trigger rapid unwinding of those positions. Movement beyond key resistance often shifts market dynamics unexpectedly.
Scenario 2: Consolidation (35% probability)
Should delays occur in deploying Verkle Trees, regulatory setbacks concerning staking might follow. Implementation hiccups could precede unfavorable policy shifts. If progress stalls here, scrutiny there may intensify. Technical slowdowns often coincide with tighter oversight. When upgrades lag, authorities tend to respond. Progress gaps invite examination. A holdup in one area sometimes triggers reactions elsewhere.
Expect ETH to move within a tight band, held above by $3,500 and below by the whale-supported floor near $3,100. Such stability may signal investor reshuffling rather than expansion. Growth could resume more firmly starting mid-2026. Movement now reflects preparation, not acceleration.

Bitcoin now recognized as key financial resource. Countries increasingly store it within state portfolios. Shift noticeable - once met with caution, now treated as valuable reserve. Attitudes transformed from skepticism toward institutional embrace. Here's a look at the top Bitcoin holders as of 2026.
1. United States of America
Leading global holdings sit in America, where 198,012 BTC are held. A significant portion of this digital stockpile, valued around $18 billion, arrived via high-profile legal seizures - among them, the dismantling of Silk Road and reclaimed assets from the Bitfinex breach. Since then, policy direction under Trump began tilting; Bitcoin moved slowly from forensic exhibit toward inclusion in broader financial reserves.
2. China
Even though trade rules are tight, China owns about 194,000 BTC. A large part arrived after authorities took control of funds linked to the 2019 PlusToken scam. Worth more than 17.6 billion dollars now, the stash remains under state oversight. Following legal actions that year, digital assets were moved into official custody without delay.
3. United Kingdom
Third globally stands the United Kingdom, holding 61,245 BTC. These entered state custody largely due to probes into illicit activity. A series of operations targeting complex financial concealment systems led to the acquisition. Years of enforcement actions contributed to the total. Judicial processes followed each seizure. Assets were transferred under legal authority. Quantity reflects outcomes of multiple case resolutions.
4. Ukraine
With 46,351 bitcoins held, Ukraine built its reserves mostly via international digital currency gifts aimed at rebuilding efforts after conflict. Such inflows highlight how Bitcoin can serve as critical funding when political instability strikes. Yet another example of assets shifting beyond traditional borders under pressure.
5. Bhutan
Bhutan ranks unexpectedly at number five, holding 11,286 BTC. Instead of confiscating digital assets, the country draws on plentiful hydropower. State-run facilities mine Bitcoin using this clean energy source. Power availability shapes national strategy in subtle ways.
6. UAE
A shift toward digital finance defines the nation’s path, where 6,348 BTC signals intent beyond mere investment. Positioning emerges through deliberate steps in shaping tomorrow’s economic structures.
7. El Salvador
Becoming the initial nation to accept Bitcoin legally, El Salvador holds 6,267 BTC. Though prices shift unpredictably, President Nayib Bukele continues purchasing a single unit each day.
8. North Korea Lazarus Group
Appearing without warning, the Lazarus Group - believed by some to have ties to North Korea’s state apparatus - holds roughly 804 BTC. These holdings trace back, per Chainalysis findings, not only to digital intrusions but also breaches within decentralized finance systems across global networks.
9. Venezuela
Despite ongoing financial turmoil, Venezuela has adopted Bitcoin to counter rapid currency devaluation, holding a small reserve of 240 BTC. Still, the nation's exposure stays limited amid broader economic challenges.
10. Finland
Once holding thousands of BTC seized in crime investigations, Finland moved to sell much of the stash. A mere 90 coins remain now, set aside not for profit but observation. This fragment stays under state control - less an asset, more a test case. What began as evidence ends as data point in fiscal policy.
This surge in worldwide Bitcoin acquisition marks a change in national attitudes toward digital money - no longer seen as uncertain experiment, but as part of long-term reserves. With its place in finance shifting steadily, current government positions could merely introduce broader state-level crypto approaches.
$BTC

Vor nicht allzu langer Zeit machte El Salvador mit der Anerkennung von Kryptowährungen als offizielle Währung Furore. Nun, geleitet von Präsident Nayib Bukele, geht das Land noch weiter in die Zukunft der Technologie. Kurz nachdem ein entscheidender Deal mit dem IWF abgeschlossen wurde, setzt dieses kleine Land erneut große Akzente. Sein neuester Schachzug? Eine Wette auf zwei Kräfte gleichzeitig – Bitcoin und künstliche Intelligenz. Diese Werkzeuge sollen bestimmen, wie das Land Wohlstand und Fortschritt aufbaut. Eine treibt die Finanzwelt an, die andere antreibt die Innovation. Beide erhalten höchste Priorität.
Der 1,4-Milliarden-Dollar-Kredit des IWF
Einen Moment lang lag die Spannung in der Luft; nun setzt Erleichterung ein, da El Salvador die Unterstützung des IWF sichert – endlich genehmigt wurden 1,4 Milliarden Dollar an Finanzhilfe. Überraschenderweise hat sich, was einst Widerstand war, in vorsichtiges Einvernehmen verwandelt, wobei Behörden darauf hinweisen, dass Bitcoin Teile der Wirtschaft vorangetrieben hat.

The latest stage in the DuskDS journey reflects a clear shift from preparation to execution. After a year defined by upgrades, refinement, and architectural redesign, the network is no longer simply evolving—it is positioning itself for practical deployment in regulated financial environments. This transition matters, because it highlights intent. DuskDS is not experimenting in isolation; it is building toward use cases that demand reliability, compliance, and long-term stability.
The modular architecture now underpinning the DuskDS mainnet is the foundation of this readiness. In regulated markets, systems must be adaptable without being fragile. Rules change, reporting standards evolve, and technological expectations increase. A modular system allows individual components to be adjusted or upgraded without disrupting the entire network. For financial institutions, this is not an innovation trend—it is a necessity.
What makes this development especially relevant for the audience is how deliberately it has been approached. DuskDS did not rush toward modularity as a marketing narrative. It emerged through iteration. Each upgrade served a purpose, contributing to a structure that can support complex financial workflows. This methodical progress builds confidence, particularly among participants who understand the cost of instability in financial systems.
The announcement of DuskEVM as the upcoming EVM-compatible application layer marks a natural extension of this strategy. Rather than reinventing the developer experience, DuskDS is embracing familiarity where it matters most. The EVM is already a standard across the industry. Developers, auditors, and institutions know how it works. By integrating EVM compatibility, Dusk lowers friction while maintaining its core principles.
Importantly, DuskEVM is not positioned as a generic execution layer. It exists within a framework designed for privacy-aware and compliance-ready applications. This distinction is critical. Many EVM environments optimize for openness and composability, but struggle to accommodate regulatory requirements. DuskEVM addresses this gap by embedding execution into an infrastructure already aligned with real-world financial constraints.
From a mindshare perspective, this approach is quietly effective. DuskDS is not asking the audience to abandon existing knowledge. It is offering continuity an environment where familiar tools can be used in a more responsible context. This continuity is attractive to builders who want to move beyond experimentation and into production-grade systems.
The tone of DuskDS’s communication reinforces this positioning. There is no sense of urgency-driven promotion. Instead, updates are framed as milestones within a longer roadmap. This transparency builds trust. The audience is treated as informed participants, capable of understanding complexity without simplification.
Relevance, in this case, comes from alignment. DuskDS aligns with where blockchain adoption is realistically heading, not where speculation temporarily points. As financial institutions explore tokenization, on-chain settlement, and digital asset infrastructure, the demand for compliant, adaptable networks will grow. DuskDS is preparing for that demand now.
The combination of a modular mainnet and an EVM-compatible execution layer suggests a broader vision. DuskDS is not trying to replace existing ecosystems. It is carving out a space where regulation and decentralization can coexist without compromise. This balance is difficult to achieve, which is precisely why it matters.
As the next phase unfolds, DuskDS stands as an example of blockchain infrastructure built with patience and foresight. It is not defined by announcements alone, but by readiness. For an audience watching the industry mature, DuskDS represents a project moving steadily from theory into practical relevance one deliberate step at a time.
@Dusk #Dusk #dusk $DUSK

The evolution of the DuskDS mainnet over the past year is not just a sequence of upgrades it is a signal of intent. While much of the blockchain industry competes for visibility, DuskDS has been refining its foundations. This refinement has led to a modular architecture designed specifically for regulated financial markets, a direction that places long-term usability above short-term excitement.
Modularity is often discussed as a technical improvement, but in the context of DuskDS, it represents something broader. Regulated finance operates under constant change. Compliance requirements evolve, reporting standards shift, and risk frameworks are regularly updated. A monolithic blockchain struggles in such an environment. DuskDS addresses this challenge by allowing individual layers to evolve without destabilizing the entire system. For institutions, this flexibility is critical.
This architectural shift reflects a deeper understanding of adoption barriers. Financial entities do not reject blockchain because of ideology; they reject it because of uncertainty. Systems that cannot adapt safely are liabilities. By redesigning DuskDS around modular components, the network positions itself as infrastructure that can respond to regulation rather than resist it.
For the audience, this matters because it reframes what blockchain readiness looks like. DuskDS is not promising disruption for its own sake. It is offering continuity. That continuity builds trust, especially among participants who understand that finance values predictability as much as innovation.
Against this backdrop, the upcoming DuskEVM layer becomes a strategic extension rather than a standalone feature. EVM compatibility is familiar territory for developers, auditors, and institutions. By introducing DuskEVM, DuskDS removes a major friction point: the need to learn an entirely new execution environment. This decision is practical, not performative.
What makes DuskEVM particularly relevant is how it integrates into the broader architecture. It is not bolted on as an afterthought. Instead, it operates within a system already designed for privacy, compliance, and controlled transparency. This allows EVM-based applications to benefit from a framework that acknowledges real-world constraints.
From a mindshare perspective, this approach is subtle but powerful. DuskDS is not competing with existing EVM ecosystems on volume or speed. It is differentiating on context. Developers building for regulated markets now have a clearer option—one that does not require sacrificing familiar tools or compliance expectations.
Communication plays a key role in how this transition is perceived. DuskDS does not frame DuskEVM as a revolution. It is presented as the next logical step in a broader architectural journey. This honesty resonates with an audience that understands infrastructure is iterative by nature.
As blockchain continues to intersect with traditional finance, the projects that succeed will be those built with constraints in mind. DuskDS is shaping itself around those constraints, turning them into design principles rather than obstacles.
With a modular mainnet already in place and DuskEVM approaching, DuskDS is moving into a phase defined by readiness. Not readiness for hype, but readiness for responsibility. For an audience watching the industry mature, that distinction makes all the difference.
@Dusk #Dusk #dusk $DUSK

In den vergangenen zwölf Monaten hat das DuskDS Mainnet eine leise, aber bedeutungsvolle Transformation durchlaufen. Anstatt Aufmerksamkeit zu suchen, hat das Netzwerk sich auf Verfeinerung konzentriert – es hat iteriert, aktualisiert und seine Architektur neu gedacht, um den Anforderungen regulierter Finanzmärkte gerecht zu werden. Diese Entwicklung spiegelt eine größere Veränderung im Bereich der Blockchain wider: von Experimenten hin zu einer Infrastruktur, die verantwortungsvoll und skalierbar betrieben werden kann.
Im Zentrum dieser Reise steht Modulargestaltung. DuskDS hat sich von einem starren, einheitlichen Design weg bewegt und stattdessen eine modulare Architektur entwickelt, die es ermöglicht, verschiedene Komponenten des Netzwerks unabhängig voneinander weiterzuentwickeln. Für Finanzmärkte ist dies kein technischer Luxus – es ist eine Notwendigkeit. Vorschriften, Compliance, Datenschutz und Leistung ändern sich im Laufe der Zeit. Ein modulares System ermöglicht die Anpassung, ohne die Integrität des gesamten Netzwerks zu gefährden.