There's something I still can't understand: for weeks, I've been seeing posts on $OM saying that the token will never recover.
And frankly, I'm wondering.
What if $OM just needs time? What if OM ends up surprising everyone, once again? What if...
I'm not saying it will necessarily return to its ATH, but I find it interesting to analyze why others think it's over.
So tell me 👇 For those who are pessimistic: what makes you thin #om won't come back? And for the optimists: what signals or indicators are you basing your confidence on?
I'm curious to read your points of view. The debate is open 💬
Many are already predicting the death of $TRUMP . “No more momentum, no more future, game over.”
Yet, looking at the chart, we can clearly see another scenario taking shape.
No, a return to $100 or ATH may not be realistic today. But there is still momentum, and an opportunity for those who know how to read the market and settle for a more modest move.
This is not a promise, just an observation: even a “dead” market can offer tickets to those who remain lucid. #TRUMP
Good performance, $BTC bulls! Well… unless you’ve been comparing crypto to the stock market 😁
Two scenarios for the coming week: 1️⃣ Weekly close above $80,600 but below $93k→ slightly bullish, consolidation range 2️⃣ Weekly close above $93,400→ strictly bullish, full trend reversal confirmed Bottom line: $BTC stays bullish as long as it holds $74,600 as weekly support.
At ~$80,611 right now, structure is recovering bulls are building. 👀
The crypto exchange Coinbase has laid off about 700 employees.
Two reasons: a bad market and AI CEO Brian Armstrong writes that AI engineers can do in days what used to take a whole team weeks to accomplish. #coinbase
Since yesterday, several altcoins ($BABY , $LUNC , $GENIUS) have skyrocketed simply by following the $BTC trend. And yet… many are still trying to short a market that’s on the rise.
It’s too high It’s bound to come back down
positions without stops, accounts liquidated.
Simple rule: don’t fight the trend. Either you ride it, or you stay on the sidelines.
When momentum is strong, trying to predict the top is often the worst decision.
The ceasefire news sent $ZEC flying. Peaked at $405. Looked like a reclaim. Wasn’t.
Price collapsed back to $319 before the session even cooled nearly wiping out the entire move in real time. That’s not bullish price action. That’s a liquidity sweep. Sellers were positioned. They let retail chase the breakout, then distributed straight into the excitement. Classic.
Support at $319 is the only thing standing between current price and a full retest of the $180 base. No clean hold above $405 means the burden of proof stays on bulls. The macro catalyst was real. The follow through wasn’t.
$SOL clearly shows that the major players are fed up with these endless fluctuations within a narrow range! This inverse head-and-shoulders pattern should really shake things up!
Today’s daily and especially weekly close could set the tone for what’s next on Bitcoin, currently trading around the 70k area.
From a technical perspective, three scenarios are in play:
1⃣ A close above 72k would confirm strength. In that case, dips could be viewed as opportunities, with a potential move toward new local highs.
2⃣ A close below 71k would signal rejection. That would likely turn this move into another failed breakout, opening the door for a pullback toward the 67k zone.
3⃣ A close around 70k–71.5k keeps things unclear. No strong directional bias, and probably a choppy week ahead.
The market is at a key decision point. Only a few hours left before a critical close. $BTC
Google has brought back a debate many thought was still far away: the quantum threat to Bitcoin.
In a recent paper, its Quantum AI team suggests that breaking Bitcoin’s current cryptography may require far fewer resources than previously estimated. The new figures point to under 500,000 physical qubits roughly an 80% reduction compared to earlier assumptions. On paper, that changes how the risk is perceived. A sufficiently advanced quantum computer could theoretically intercept a transaction and attempt to redirect it before confirmation. This remains a hypothetical scenario for now, but it is becoming more plausible as technical assumptions evolve. The key point is simple: the threat is not immediate, but it is getting closer. No existing machine today can perform such an attack. Most projections still place this capability years, if not decades, away. However, lowering the resource threshold shifts the narrative from a distant, theoretical risk to something that could become relevant within a more realistic timeframe. Another aspect worth watching is exposure. A significant portion of $BTC in circulation sits in wallets where public keys have already been revealed on chain through past transactions. Under current conditions, this is not an issue. But in a future where quantum capabilities reach the required level, this data could become exploitable. On the industry side, signals are already emerging. Google plans to transition parts of its infrastructure to post-quantum cryptography by the end of the decade a move that highlights growing awareness among major tech players. So far, the market has not reacted to these developments. Bitcoin’s price action remains driven primarily by macro factors. But a broader question is starting to surface Is the market underestimating a long-term risk… or simply waiting for it to become real before pricing it in?
The S&P 500 is currently showing a pattern that strongly resembles the one observed during the same period last year.
At that time, the market had undergone a similar correction… before going on to reach a new all-time high (ATH).
At the same time, the crypto market has experienced significant volatility. Over the course of about 20 days, more than $300 billion was injected and then withdrawn, illustrating a phase of uncertainty and capital repositioning.
This type of movement is not insignificant.
When traditional markets correct, the crypto market often reacts in an amplified manner. But historically, these phases of volatility sometimes precede more structured movements.
The current situation therefore raises an interesting question:
Are we in a simple correction phase… or in a transition period before a new bull cycle? $BTC
Last year, he made around 60k in just a few months. Everything was moving fast, maybe too fast.
He said he was pulling in between $1,500 and $3,000 a day. His edge was simple: trading high-beta stocks while following the moves of the S&P 500. At first, it felt easy. Wins kept stacking, confidence kept growing and so did his position sizes.
Then things shifted.
He started letting losing trades run. Holding positions longer than planned. Sometimes overnight, sometimes for weeks, just hoping the market would turn back in his favor. It didn’t.
He ended up wiping out all his profits #plus an extra $45k from his own capital.
Now he’s trying to rebuild.
Over the past few months, he’s changed everything. Smaller positions. No overnight holds. Only trading the first hour of the session. He takes what the market gives him usually between $500 and $1,500.
So far, it’s been more consistent. Fewer losing days.